50th Anniversary Social Construction Thomas Luckmann

[@daviddulom8258]

Omg, thank you for this interview, being from a sociology background I would prefer to see all the prominent sociolists articulating their concepts by themselves, original is always better than translation. Thank you a ton for this beautiful interview.

[@MrEDGE1984]

Two great men has gone, but their ideas will resonate for long, this is what a life ought to be, Sociology of knowledge will be incomplete without bringing peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann in to the discussion.

[@anisa9236]

This is beautiful to read. Thomas Luckmann was my grandfather and I am starting to understand his works and his doing. Interviews like this and his book keep him alive for me. So I thank you very much for this comment it lightened my mood on this special day

[@MrEDGE1984]

This is very precious for me too. Thanks. I am overwhelmed by this. I am just about to finish the work "Social construction of reality", just few pages left and it is changing me from inside out. This is really kind of "world" changing stuff. May he RIP. He and his collegue will always be in the conscience of the intellects and street people alike, always whoever read this great work.

[@bernardofitzpatrick5403]

@@anisa9236 you are so fortunate

[@oriolcardona2613]

Such a great sociologist, with great ideas and understanding of the sociology and society. Ofcourse Berger too. I dont understand how it is so much underrated. As a catalan speaker i'm very lucky Joan Estruch did translate the book so well and detailed. Nothing to do with the spanish translation.

[@HUZ9k3s5w]

Thanks for this!!

[@sociologicalknowledge7748]

Great contribution to sociology, sir.

[@kqp1998gyy]

🌷

[@z0uLess]

I just dont see how you can make such great works out of nothing other than the theory of others. Its been many years since Ive read it but it did not give much meaning to me when I did, and the use of it in contemporary culture does not entice me to read it again. Why does it always seem that the big works of religious critique always, in a sense, end up looking religious?