9/11 News Coverage, UPN9 - 2 hours

September 11, 2001 TV Broadcast from WWOR-TV, time undetermined

[@samchristie913]

I can't believe this station ignore the whole thing

[@patcook-kb0oxdsclassictvsh874]

With a typical UPN station, being the last to break into regular programming or do hourly updates would be expected But this is WWOR in New York. This is THEIR BACKYARD Even WUSA in Washington had the sense to drop CBS once The Pentagon was hit (And WTTG also in Washington NEVER joined the Fox network until primetime)

[@GaryVaporwave]

they said "the united nations" was attacked, not the United States. That'd make sense in 2024.. Amazing to hear it in 2001.

[@noklarok]

thumbnail guy was edited

[@CTV911]

Thumbnail at 8:38

[@stevensuarez4843]

Hi CTV911, is there any way I can contact you? Via email?

[@MshAhmxiO1]

46:40 never forget

[@klayed]

even no honor at the upn9 channel ☹☹

[@patcook-kb0oxdsclassictvsh874]

They later had one of the first interviews with Donald Trump which I believe was later than this coverage lasts

[@CTV911]

Funny, I posted that, too! kzbin.info/www/bejne/rnqpd4qbqb6efNk

[@matrixfree3480]

Wow..he said explosion at the base of the tower in the begining of the video. It sure wasnt planes that brought those toqers down.

[@cipherjoe9]

Yeah sure bud

[@stephen_crumley]

⁠@@cipherjoe9only a fool would believe those buildings could go down like they did because of asymmetric damage to the top 20% of their structure. Simultaneous global failure of all connection points floor by floor to the ground is laughable to everyone with even a basic understanding of structural engineering. The factor of safety in design engineering in the complex was a factor of 3 or more. Perhaps you should consider researching about high rise structural engineering. You obviously do not understand these buildings are not slapped together with 5/4 boards and 16 penny nails sir

[@tangerinebabe1]

​@stephen_crumley if you truly believe a comment from someone that wasn't there is proof of some conspiracy theory, that a skyscraper built with a steel structure would be able to withstand, not only the weight of a fully loaded commercial passenger jet, but the intense heat and fire that would be caused by the thousands of litres of aviation fuel emptying down the lift shaft, then your are the fool my friend. If they were concrete structures, then I would be asking why?

[@Tj11813]

You people are nothing but parakeets.