911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77

[@nanksgaming4897]

In 2024 im not gonna lie. For the past 23 years i thought the plane somehow hit from an angle from above. Its the first time ever i decided to research this incident and found this video.

[@mooneyes2k478]

"through" would cause more damage than "from above". Not saying that that's the thought the terrorists had, but it IS possible.

[@UNVACCINATED20]

Dont you find it strange, the pentagon, a highly secured area only has one camera catch this “plane?”

[@nanksgaming4897]

@@UNVACCINATED20 I'm certain there's footage they're withholding from the public. Valid point you make.

[@mooneyes2k478]

@@UNVACCINATED20 Don't you find it strange that people think cameras would be on the OUTSIDE in a "highly secured area"? But I'm sure random patches of lawn and sky are really important in the scheme of security.

[@nacho-man1063]

Same here…. This plane was flying like a lawnmower.. make no sense.

[@sriramthodla3104]

All the cameras around the pentagon and we have one security footage? I agree that your analysis is detailed and the likely scenario but the lack of supporting video footage is disturbing.

[@mooneyes2k478]

What cameras?

[@shillhunter4380]

​@@mooneyes2k478 all of them. Especially the one directly above the hole.

[@bobloblaw7465]

​Pentagon has cameras everywhere@@mooneyes2k478

[@HalloweenStuff-f2l]

It’s a shitty video too

[@emperorzurg7258]

@@shillhunter4380 How do you know there was a camera above the hole?

[@ThePretzelHead]

surely there was clearer video of this act from the pentagon's cameras...one of the most secured and monitored buildings in the world.

[@joeythecat6334]

I think it's mostly monitored from the inside

[@daliggy4503]

@@joeythecat6334 lmao go check out the outside of the building. There are cameras everywhere.

[@64bakes]

@@daliggy4503 Were those cameras there in 2001?

[@daliggy4503]

@@64bakes yes

[@Thomas998822]

@@daliggy4503 he knows that...people like him like to pretend they are stupid and make up nonsense to lay cover for how corrupt and murderous the government is.

[@Islamisthecultofsin]

This is an excellent video showing what happened at the Pentagon. Thank you for making it.

[@nellynelltv208]

U believe anything America got ya fooled

[@Islamisthecultofsin]

@@nellynelltv208 I don't just blindly believe whatever I'm told. I also understand Is lam and why they commit their attacks.

[@bagintree]

If you want, you can ignore the dozens of pictures of plane wreckage, the news reports of the day with eyewitnesses, the pictures of the engines, the forensic evidence such as passenger and crew DNA found at the scene, the FDR which shows exactly what happened to the plane, the hundreds of eyewitnesses, some of whom correctly identified the A/A logo and make of airplane. You can also ignore the fact that there's no evidence of Flight 77 going anywhere else. Absolutely none. Sure, IF you ignore all that, your conspiracy claims make sense. But in reality they don't. It's better to live in reality, not 9/11 Trutherland where uninformed opinions and misinterpretations become fact

[@robertodilizio6225]

Couldn't have said better! Some theories are absolutely ridiculous (e.g. no planes, but missiles or props).

[@xanderarena]

It's so funny how nearly all of the recovered wreckage on the lawn had clear lettering on it. Do you know the statistical improbability of that?

[@JohnSmith-jp8se]

I mean what’s more likely, a plane hit the pentagon or a plane full of passengers was taken to a black site and murdered, a missile was then sent to the pentagon, explosive charges blew up the light poles to make people think it was a plane, then the murdered people had their DNA planted at the pentagon and plane parts were snuck in. Why else is there no video!? Of course I am making fun of the crazy insane absurd conspiracy theories. Those people that think a plane actually hit the pentagon are some grade A insane sheep. All the evidence points to a missile.

[@jimbo1959]

I've been to crash sites of large Airliners( and small planes ). EVERY TIME there has been wreckage and debris ALL OVER ( and a MASSIVE CRATER in the ground ( for the large Aircraft ). No AIRCRAFT hit the Pentagon!, and according to what I have SEEN, I don't believe flight 93 crashed in that open field. There was NO DEBRIS, NOTHING!! They dug a " small " hole in the ground and tried to pass it off as the crash site! That was not a crash site of a Airliner.

[@Planes_man]

So the plane wreckage is fake, the American airline piece are fake. Heck, at 5:47 , the piece isn’t real

[@mickael486]

ok. still would love to see any one of the 50+ cameras that the FBI seized of this mysterious (not saying it's not) plane. Now I'd love an explanation on building 7.

[@TrutherRD2D]

+Mickael Mc where is your evidence of 50+ cameras???

[@mickael486]

***** I did the math. would you at least agree on 30 cameras? and then explain to me how that makes my point any less obvious?

[@TrutherRD2D]

Mickael Mc LMAO! @ "math" Show me evidence of 30 cams.

[@mickael486]

***** I don't understand this argument. Are you suggesting that their own camera's (the majority of them) and the hotel, and the gas station's were not all confiscated and deliberately never shown to the public?

[@TrutherRD2D]

Mickael Mc first you claim there was 50 cams, then you back track and say 30... and now your confused? What the fuck man, you think this is funny shit? 3,000 people got killed and your playing fuckin games... the video that was confiscated was held as Evidence and not released until the Zacarias Moussaoui trial was over... this is normal practice, do some fuckin research... the videos were released and many are on youtube.

[@DrUndies]

WHY the FUCK don't they just release ONE photo of a PLANE hitting the Pentagon. It would put an immediate end to all the theories.

[@StundieAward]

"photo of a PANE hitting the Pentagon" Dunno, you suggesting it was glass that caused the damage?

[@DrUndies]

hahahaha I made a funny typo and you made a funnier joke! I'll pay that one - PANE has been found and is being water boarded as we speak!

[@billybobjoe9010]

Pane Stewart? I'm sorry but I've been watching Mayday. I just had to. #sorry

[@DrUndies]

Yes Pane Stewart has been inked to flying the jet that hit the Pentagon. Stay tuned.

[@DrUndies]

Watch the greatest Tattoo mistakes for more information.

[@homeslicehippy7807]

I can't get my head round there was no other camera's at all along the Pentagon just that little one at the gate..Normally they are everywhere

[@1wannabee1]

(very convenient dont you think?) :)

[@abysslheritier2252]

In 2001, the informatic technologie wasn't has advanced as today. There weren't 10000000 of security cam everywhere wich take videos in 4K 60 FPS 24/7, the whole bunch of it only took 1FPS in 144p if it wasn't less. A lot of decision (more cam, more security in airport) was taken....just because of 9/11

[@abysslheritier2252]

@Equitable Apple what's funny?

[@abysslheritier2252]

@Equitable Apple No no ^^ YOUR cognitive dissonance is really high. You should give your body to science

[@abysslheritier2252]

@Equitable Apple and you believe that in 2001, there were 4K camera and you believe the lie of conspirationnists

[@liarfire101]

Lamp pole three hit the jet AND the ground at five hundred miles an hour and moved ten feet. 1:14

[@Just.A.T-Rex]

Right? Strange the wings made a perfect joke in the towers as well as the engines, but this one miraculously had its wings “fold” in? And fit through the way to small of an impact hole. It was a missile/new drone tech loaded with explosive. Also we shot that one plane down.

[@waspsfriend8577]

@@Just.A.T-Rex The people on site said the hole was much bigger than it looked on tv And if it was a missile how did it hit a generator without exploding An you can see the wing marks anyway so I'm not sure what you mean

[@bakedandsalty9234]

Hit pole #2 but not the massive trees in front the pole #2 seems questionable.

[@erictheepic5019]

@@Just.A.T-Rex Without even thinking about what size hole a 757 would make in the side of the Pentagon, think about the statement that it's a drone. Why? Why would it be a drone or a missile? According to you (or other people that spout this theory), they crashed two fucking planes into two of the most expensive buildings in NYC. Clearly they spared no expense. So why cut corners like this? What stopped them from just using another plane? It looks like planes were in no short supply. So what's the reasoning that they couldn't just use another plane? And don't sidestep the issue by saying "but it looks like a missile exploded!" because there are two things wrong with that. First, you're still left without any motive for using a missile instead of a plane. Secondly, how the hell should you know what a plane crashing into the Pentagon should look like? Did you get a PhD in planes crashing into buildings?

[@steveh46]

@@Just.A.T-Rex The exterior Pentagon was not made of glass. The wings of the planes made an impression on the glass facade of the Towers. The wings collapsed against the Pentagon. But the hole was huge. You are wrong on many counts.

[@sawny666]

I enjoyed the commentary of this video. Very refreshing to hear.

[@TLO129]

Agreed

[@sicfxmusic]

Am I only one who didn't see the plane in real footage?

[@yoellee4147]

something moving over 6 or 700km/hr right in front of you or camera, you will most likely to see nothing.. just use your common sense if u got brain.

[@franklyfrank8710]

A jet doesn't fly 6 or 700km/hr at ground level ! did you know that?

[@stephenbernsen169]

yes you are

[@ssmusic214]

***** LOL! If it was no plane, than it can't be anything other than UFO.

[@aj.1505]

Carl CIFER The "official" video shows no plane, that's y I was confused who to believe lol

[@pleasantness1704]

The dumbest part about the no plane hitting the Pentagon theory is that in the case of the other 2 targets and the failed attempt to hit the Capitol, 3 planes were involved. Why all of a sudden would Bin Laden and Co go to the trouble of hijacking 3 planes to hit their targets, but randomly for the Pentagon, they'd shoot a missile at it? If they had the ability to use one missile, why not just use missiles in all 4 of the attacks? Why go through all that trouble of teaching non pilot terrorists how to hijack and subsequently fly a commercial airliner into specific targets? That seems so much harder and riskier to pull off compared to just adding three extra missiles into the equation if they were already able to use that one alleged missile for the Pentagon. Also, if they were using a missile for just the Pentagon, where would they be shooting that missile from? Why are there no reports about said potential missile's origin but an overwhelming amount of evidence that not only did flight 77 exist, but that it was also hijacked and subsequently flown into the Pentagon? Also, regarding the immediate aftermath of the explosion at the Pentagon, photographers captured a number of images of plane parts scattered around the section of the building that was hit. If there really wasn't a plane involved, where did those plane parts come from? How were those parts scattered around so quickly and so tactfully as to not be seen and then alert suspicion? Go to google right now and you'll be able to see the photos of bits and pieces of flight 77 scattered around the area of the Pentagon that was hit if you search thoroughly enough. You know this conspiracy doesn't make any g#%da@#ed sense, so stop wasting your time with this imbecilic theory. The truth in this case, is pretty straight forward, at least as it pertains to how the Pentagon specifically was attacked.

[@bliaher1582]

Another dumb part about the missile theory is that they never mention the passenger's who died on the plane. Some even say their identities we're fake.

[@SurgeFire]

Honestly, virtually all of these conspiracy theorists just don't even take the time to actually do their research, listen to recordings, read documents. It's brainrotting.

[@mooneyes2k478]

@@bliaher1582 Which would be really impressive, what with one of them being a former congressional lawyer, published author, and CNN commentator....and that's just ONE of the people on board.

[@jimbo1959]

WHAT??? A 747 is 63 feet high( 6 stories ).The hole in the wall is about 15 ft high. There no dug up ground ( there would have to be ) in front of the hole in the wall! That's Mathematically IMPOSSIBLE! ALSO the light poles were sheared off ( I don't know of a light pole that's 60 ft. high), but the ground was UNTOUCHED??? The ground would HAVE to be dug up like a Crater... Another bit of impossible! And why would Bin Laden...Blah, Blah, Blah???.....HE DIDN'T!!!!! Don't you think the Pentagon would have the BEST video SECURITY IN THE WORLD???? There is no plane in this ( or any other ) because there wasn't one!!

[@jimbo1959]

WRONG!!!!

[@MyCatInABox]

good job on this 3-D model. It really shows what were are looking at through the security camera (ok..... SUPPOSEDLY shows us what we're looking at). And it puts everything else into perspective for those who just saw bits and pieces of this event on TV.

[@markjones1184]

I feel more confident with this visavis understanding. This one crash always had me asking

[@gavinbeacom3251]

This is a great demonstration!! Very interesting I even subscribed!

[@americawhereareyou]

+Gavin Beacom I have a lovely bridge you may be interested in.

[@PaulV513]

My main questions are: how does a massive, 400lb. plane like a Boeing 757 nearly evaporate upon impact, except for those metal scraps etc. that are shown? How did the wings not totally shear off upon impact, or perhaps the tail section? Would not at least one of a 757's fairy large turbines engines be found mostly intact?

[@derpman7056]

it blew up and was totally destroyed in the incident? IDK. There could have been a bomb and people mistook it for a plane seeing how 2 planes had hit the world trade center at the time

[@PaulV513]

But those wings would easily shear off upon hitting those HUGELY enforced concrete walls. Or even just major pieces of them. No fire or explosion would just make them "evaporate" - science doesn't work that way!

[@derpman7056]

While I believe the 2 planes that hit the World Trade Center and the 1 that hit the field in Pennsylvania were legit Terrorist attacks that got 2/3 targets hit I've been doing some reader's and something seems fishy about the Pentagon

[@PaulV513]

I can't lie: I have similar questions about the plane that went down in PA. If you search for photos after it happened, all we really see is a "scorched" hole and not many remnants of a plane either.

[@derpman7056]

the only question I have about the PA plane is what was it supposed to hit?

[@LynnWithoutAnE]

This is the first time I've seen this illustration. It adds a whole knew perspective and understanding of what happened and how. I only ever saw that split second security footage.

[@NarrativeNelly]

I actually never noticed the plane in the corner on the security footage. Everyone tries to convince you it was a missile that came straight in but this makes more sense.

[@tomlaf1882]

Yes a missile makes zero sense

[@RIPzippyshare]

yeah, i compared previous frame to this and there is a difference

[@davepowell7168]

Jet engines would have sucked in lines of turf. Ever heard of a FOD walk?

[@waspanimations7037]

There's another angle we're it isn't obscured and you can see the whole thing with the red and blue coloring, albeit low quality.

[@davepowell7168]

@@waspanimations7037 Does the Pentagon lawn remain as pristine?

[@ouchyg]

This animation uses a slight of hand at 2:15 to shrink the plane to half its size in order to make the bogus theory work. The creator of the video has gone on record admitting he had to shrink the plane to make it match the video

[@MFitz12]

No it doesn't. I assure you that is the correct scale. You are in error.

[@ouchyg]

@@MFitz12 I assure you I'm not. Ask Mike Wilson.

[@MFitz12]

@@ouchyg - Yes you most definitely are and who the Eff is Mike Wilson an why should I care?

[@ouchyg]

@@MFitz12 Mike WIlson made this animation.

[@MFitz12]

@@ouchyg And he did it correctly so what is the problem?

[@davidjohnjr]

Haven't you seen the first image of the Pentagon before the front face/wall fell? No holes for the wings. No wings on ground.

[@davidjohnjr]

***** Did you even take the time to comprehend what I said? The first pictures of the attack, prior to when the wall fell and the damage looked much worse, shows no damage/entry point of the wings. And no wings on the ground.

[@davidjohnjr]

***** What are you, 10 years old? It's not simply the "wing indentations", it's that I have yet to see how the engines made it into the Pentagon. There are plenty of questions that should've been answered--the families deserve it!! But our government suppressed any attempt at an investigation, and more money was spent for a blowjob than on 9/11. So say what you'd like, I'll remain a skeptic of this any many other unanswered questions about that day: WTC7 from fire? Give me a break..

[@davidjohnjr]

***** Confirmed: child

[@davidjohnjr]

***** Don't need it.

[@rubiconvicts2891]

+oh im too weak don't kill me please 2 planes can't take down 3 buildings... the attack in NYC was followed by a controlled demolition set by your government. Pretty sure the "plane" that hit the pentagon was actually a tomahawk missile... your friend here is actually speaking the truth... stop hating, and start reading actual studies instead of ingesting fluoride and watching fox news... In this day and age, ignorance is a fuckin choice.

[@parandhamsai]

That's one heck of a animation. Great job guys. I hope it brings closure to many thousands of families who had to know what exactly happened 🇺🇸👍👍

[@jackgunn1480]

Not sure how a computer animation can bring closure when actual video footage is still being locked away from the public.

[@MohammadAliKhalil]

@@jackgunn1480 exactly

[@tomlaf1882]

@@jackgunn1480 what footage is being locked up?

[@tomlaf1882]

Do you have proof this “locked up” footage exists?

[@jackgunn1480]

@@tomlaf1882 Obviously the Pentagon has hundreds of cameras around it's exterior and we haven't seen footage from any of those except that crappy one at the gate. Why wont they show us footage from the other cameras?

[@pugsan]

I've always found it fascinating that the headquarters building of the United States Department of Defense, across the river from the capital of the United States and the White House only had one 360p camera that was able to video a 757 slamming into it.

[@mooneyes2k478]

I've always found it fascinating that anyone would think it would have even that.

[@triangleman9997]

Whoops i guess. Just watch football 🏈

[@gradyswanson4732]

@@triangleman9997 circus and bread

[@rmn070]

I’m no supporter of the 9/11 Truth movement, but this is the only thing that baffles me

[@drifter402]

@@rmn070 First of all it was two cameras. Second, it was 2001. They weren't running HD video constantly pointing at random angles of the lawn.

[@voodooprincess11]

Oh wow, blurry pictures and cute little animations. Well you've changed my mind. =D

[@ssmusic214]

In order to change your MIND you have to HAVE ONE in the first place =D

[@markfry4304]

So I'm assuming you believe conspiracies that literally have zero evidence. Ok.

[@waspsfriend8577]

@@ssmusic214 That was great

[@starter47990]

How is it that the most powerful military instillation in the world has only one bad quality security camera?

[@MFitz12]

Security at the Pentagon is performed by armed patrols, not fat guys sleeping in front of a bank of TV screens. You know, actual security, not theft prevention at the mall.

[@waspsfriend8577]

Actually o found 2 camera footage from the same video and the plane is even easier to see

[@hhhbbhbhb]

@@waspsfriend8577 can i see??

[@sinekonata]

@@waspsfriend8577 It's easier to see but it's rather dark in shade, tail included and a bit short. If someone can play with lens distortion and sunlight tracing to explain the colour and why it's slightly short in size, I'll be fully convinced. Now I'm at 80% only.

[@sinekonata]

There's plenty more. Not only from the pentagon, but all was seized by FBI ofc.

[@KnightRadar]

For ages, I argued the Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane. This is the most compelling video I've seen. Thank you. That pilot got a 1 in a million shot at the Pentagon coming in like that and so close to the ground.

[@curtismorris8126]

If you think for one second that that was humanly possible you need to go back to school.

[@my3dviews]

@@curtismorris8126 Maybe you are the one who needs to go back to school. The video shows the evidence with photos, of the lighting poles that were knocked down by the wings of the plane. As does the debris of the plane strewn all over the Pentagon lawn. Maybe don't fall for every conspiracy theory on the internet. Or you will end up being a flat Earther too.

[@thomasdean7563]

It's wash DC... and ZERO video that you can identify an ACTUAL Airliner... the Pentagon only had ONE camera?

[@rawbacon]

@@curtismorris8126 Cute when Dumbasses like you tell intelligent people they need to go back to school.

[@heftyhugh9086]

What makes this compelling? There's zero actual footage of a plane hitting.

[@waynejohnson1304]

Where are the wings? They did not go through the building and yet, they were not found outside of the building. They couldn't have disappeared!

[@Sharky2055]

***** The wings were sheered off upon impact and taken in with the draft of the 757. They were found inside the building.

[@waynejohnson1304]

Sharky2055 Could you show a picture of them so, we know you told the truth? Where are the 2 Rolls Royce engines? Only one smaller engine was ever found. Rolls Royce said they never made such an engine but, later retracted that because they had Government contracts which they didn't want to lose.

[@TrutherRD2D]

***** why the fuck does sharky have to do your fucking research for you? what the fuck have you been doing for the last 13 fucking years? get off your lazy dumb fucking ass and go search like everyone else does.

[@Sharky2055]

***** www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml

[@waynejohnson1304]

***** When did I mention Jews? I wonder if my Jewish friends know I hate them? In fact, why did YOU mention Jews? Do you secretly believe that Israel was involved like 84% of all Americans do?

[@lumpheadthump]

WOW, that's a really concise and comprehensive study. Very well done

[@albertlaane8667]

its not right

[@lumpheadthump]

@@albertlaane8667 Which part of it?

[@Stay-Tooned-In]

Excellent Video, actually saw something I never did in this video. Thank you for doing a nice job with it!

[@jasonk2518]

Very well done. My son is 11 and has been asking about this day. I told him there are a lot of different opinions so let's take a look together. I always viewed this plane as a magic bullet type theory. No way that idiot was able to maneuver a plane like that. I've been in NJ my whole life so I still don't like to think too much about it. But i mark today as the 1st time I'm convinced the plane actually did hit the pentagon. Now if someone can explain tower 7 to me I can really be at peace

[@MFitz12]

Maneuver a plane like what? Ever hear of Richard Russell? I can explain Building 7 to a high degree of detail.

[@Thisbudsforyou]

Listening.

[@mooneyes2k478]

"No way that idiot was able to maneuver a plane like that. " The "idiot" that had a commercial pilots license, and 300 hours on multi-engine-jet simulators? That one?

[@metallicarabbit]

building 7 collapsed due to falling/flaming debris from the north tower and building 5 collapsing. i don't know if you realize the sheer amount of energy released when those buildings collapsed.... it generated a tremor comparable to that of a small earthquake registering 2.1 on the Richter scale, sending a down-blast of ash, fire, concrete and steel out in all directions, devastating/obliterating buildings, cars and people. these things were blasted into building 7 not only crippling the building's structural integrity but causing it to catch fire and burn until it too finally collapsed

[@yourbadger5486]

You haven't done any research. It's widely known the hijackers trained in multiple flight schools here in America.

[@paul2019.]

I used this for a timeline project for middle school and it helped a lot

[@aussiegirl3473]

You got BRAIN WASHED.. 🙏

[@supermanprime9596]

@@aussiegirl3473 Nope

[@aussiegirl3473]

@@supermanprime9596 YEP.. you will see.. the TRUTH is coming out.. and ALL WILL BE exposed..

[@supermanprime9596]

@@aussiegirl3473 Again, nope.

[@ontopram]

if it was a missle how would it have taken out all those lampposts then ?

[@emperorzurg7258]

Conspirationists never give any answer to the contradictions of their own theories. Just think about it: if the government was indeed behind it and wanted to make us believe that hijackers had a plane crash into the pentagon, then the most secure way to do it is... to send the plane themselves, like they did it into the WTC just before?! "Nah, that'd be too obvious, for the pentagon we're gonna make the plane disappear into thin air, send a missile in daylight in front of possibly one hundred witnesses, and then pretend it was indeed the plane"...

[@FriedrichMüller0]

Missile had special anti-lampost technology

[@roypiper581]

True gold. Thanks for making this.

[@joeythecat6334]

Do you mean that you think this video is a joke or you're serious

[@BlitzWing-vk1zw]

@@joeythecat6334 Hush old sport and take your tinfoil hat somewhere else

[@strychnyne3530]

if any piece of light pole entered engine why didn't wing drop? it should of cartwheeled then. like Sioux city.

[@FemaCamp]

+Strych Nyne get off the drugs,, your brain cartwheeled.

[@strychnyne3530]

+FemaCamp2016 idiot!

[@Apollo-p1l]

+FemaCamp2016 Greetings.....

[@FemaCamp]

greets.... FEMADEATHCAMPCONTROL may the force be with ya bro!

[@Apollo-p1l]

***** We are unstoppable now. FEMA will prevail.

[@jesperschultz2727]

To me it's odd that the lightpoles are relatively close to where they were before the impact. I would have thought that they would have been carried far away from their initial base if a plane came and hit them with whatever speed the plain was going at Maybe 400-600 miles per hour? And the poles even seem to be in their original shape? I would have thought they were torn completely.

[@HernanToroA]

Patadas de ahorcado.🤦🙄

[@rtpricetag3536]

The (supposed) Boeing 757-223 crashed effectively into the first floor of the Pentagon, however the two jet engines hanging 15-ft below the wings did not gouge two trenches along the ground leading up to the building.... and the crash site steel girders from impact were bent outward..... makes sense to me. Forget the material of wreckage found (only) around the Fire Station and Helicopter pad some distance away from clean crash site.

[@TLO129]

Engine parts were found. However, they are strong, but not in a million years do I believe they travelled at 530 knots into a massive reinforced, blast protected wall and travelled through 7 separate concrete blast proofed walls, and than survived almost in full. It just makes no sense. Why do you believe that? Oh yeah because your a fucking truther. Reality means nothing to you people.

[@timcornell8975]

They may have been 15' below the wings....but not the fuselage. The plane hit the Pentagon 15-18 feet off the ground. Considering it was at a angle pointing down, the first thing the engines struck was the building.

[@waspsfriend8577]

I looked at the crash marks and could see the wing marks And some of it was destroyed when the top part of the building collapsed

[@l7846]

Thank you.

[@kokak4027]

Why would the pilot risk to fly so low and even hit polls? Doesn't make sense at all

[@TheCriticalStinker-jw4fl]

Easiest way to hit the target and that is the goal - hitting the target. Have you ever reviewed the NTSB’s recreation of Flight 77 from the data recovered from the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) found at the Pentagon crash site? kzbin.info/www/bejne/aafUdXeiiJ57r9k

[@JohnWayne-w2g]

He didnt! There were NO hijacked planes that day!

[@mooneyes2k478]

@@JohnWayne-w2g Other than the hijacked planes, that is. But, since that's your argument, where exactly are registered airplanes N334AA, N612UA, N633AA and N591UA?

[@jahascootsyt4669]

Ok who the hell is still watching this in 2016-2017?

[@americawhereareyou]

Well... you are.

[@jahascootsyt4669]

americawhereareyou And you as well.

[@larryshaft9048]

Collateral kila Me to! Cause solving 9 11 would not only affect the US but the whole western world! If it was an inside job?

[@CivicS0Sick]

Collateral kila obviously u are too

[@1wannabee1]

ME!

[@jmstudios5294]

How did that “pilot” keep the plane literally feet above the ground for so long tho. From thousand Fs of feet to ground level so quickly. I think the airplane would have been higher off the ground if it’s landing gear was down

[@mooneyes2k478]

What "long"? It's a couple hundred feet at most.

[@vauxey2507]

@@mooneyes2k478ahh yes because the least qualified pilot out of the 12 was able to pull off the hardest maneuver and hit exactly the accounting section the day before 2 trillion dollars goes missing , his instructor said he shouldn’t even be trusted with a stunt plane let alone a commercial air liner 🤣

[@mooneyes2k478]

@@vauxey2507 The "least qualified" that had a commercial pilots license? That one? The "hardest maneuver" that would be overwhelmingly easy for even a non-pilot? That one? The "accounting department" that had nothing to do with accounting? That one? The "trillion dollars" that weren't missing? Those? The instructor that said nothing of the sort? That one? That you want to repeat idiocies that even 2006 know were complete fuck-wittery only shows what complete lack you have. Nothing else. Like how you decided to reply to a 4 month old comment by completely failing, by the way.

[@ThisHandleFeatureIsStupid]

@@vauxey2507 Zero percent of what you just claimed is supported by evidence. Get better. 👎

[@ufciceman8975]

​@JustinW90 not completely parallel to the ground going 570mph without slamming into the ground. Funny no other licensed commercial airline pilot could successfully remake that path in a simulator

[@Prairiedog575]

In 1987 a DC-9 (Northwest Airlines Flight 255) struck a lamp post similar to those depicted here. 17 feet of the left wing was sheared off by a single lamp post yet this airliner built before 1982 hit five poles with minor damage? Where is the animation demonstrating the effects of wing damage caused by striking 5 lamp posts? At more than 500 mph the lamp posts are on the ground only feet from their base? Then it struck a massive generator which did not rip the engine nor the wing from the aircraft? The engine is tungsten, titanium yet they left the building virtually undamaged? It seems clear to myself at least, that the 757 wings suddenly turned from super steel to cardboard after striking the lamp posts and generator.

[@mphasis1983]

911 is full of laughable shit like this m8, only on 911 LOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@KnowYourReality]

mphasis1983 Make your mind up yet? Nibiru space beams, no planes, silent controlled demo, LIHOP? All of the above? Which one is it???

[@mphasis1983]

***** HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!! only on 911 ;)

[@americawhereareyou]

***** Get laid yet? ;)

[@KnowYourReality]

***** Did you see the pics of my bimmer?

[@davidshanlay]

The skill of the pilot is amazing as far as I can imagine. The guys cannot fly a plane or just learnt basic flying managed to control the 757 at 400knots to the ground level, pinpoint the pentagon from 6000ft without mistake, control the flight exactly where the budget analysis building where the missing $2.3Trillion is being audited and crashed into fireball. It must be a miracle or some super power just get into them to make this happened. The pentagon is the military complex that is in command of the whole US arm forces but only one security camera installed. Damn! I have 8 cameras around my house alone and not to say hidden cameras inside and outside. Seem like the government lost 2.3trillions without trace so they cannot afford to install more cameras.

[@ErJitano]

It was just a pilot smarter than you.

[@Xerox-sx2jo]

Right like the government can just insert money into the bank whenever it wants... facepalm. Also I'm pretty sure he didn't practice flying a 757 into a building.

[@Xerox-sx2jo]

Triggered much? I didn't even mention I believed in any theory yet you get so pissed and your all ready for a debate. Also Allan Bolloch, do you ever say to yourself: "Fuck me, I'm wasting my sad life searching for new KZbin comments so I can try to start arguments." And btw, I have no idea what the fuck you just said. "crash it into a defense building and not the treasury?" I don't even know why you responded with that.

[@Xerox-sx2jo]

Yawn. Do you have any other words in your vocabulary other than stupid or moron? Takes one to know one I guess. Anyways I am just saying that a small plane is different than a large commercial plane ok? I don't believe in any conspiracy theory. No need to get butthurt over simple stuff you don't understand. Also how am I the loser when your the one spending your life on youtube trying to find new comments to prey on... sad...

[@Xerox-sx2jo]

Copying my line, trying to continue a pointless argument, continue to use 11 year old language... seriously get a life dude and stop pestering people in the comments...

[@politics2238]

A missile into the Pentagon would certainly go far into supporting the : "We're under attack from terrorists" story. This animation actually supports just how unlikely a jet hit the building. I have about 3,640 hours as a commercial pilot. If a hijacker was able to drive a B-757 in the manner as illustrated here, then wow, he or she was a certainly a better pilot than I

[@thew1zrd]

How in gods name would terrorists have control of a missile, a MISSILE, and be able to launch it at the Pentagon from within the Unites States? Please tell me this was a joke.

[@TheFate23]

@@thew1zrd It's implicit that it was the government to control the missile.

[@thew1zrd]

@@TheFate23 obviously - I’m saying how could they possibly blame it on a terrorist attack? That would be a horrible excuse

[@robertfoertsch]

@@thew1zrdinside Job

[@tintin1265]

@@robertfoertsch Best not mention Katherine Smith the driver licence examiner her death and Sakher Hammad's friends, who a judge put away for ten years for having WTC passes for 5 Sept. Sakher said they were working on the sprinker systems for Denko Mechanical, the Port Authority of NY City said that they had no knowledge of hiring Denko. Go Google it.

[@frank33428]

I trained pilots during Viet Nam. There is so much evidence that a jumbo jet DID NOT impact the Pentagon that it can be contained in a comment. Suffice to say I looked at the site and there was no impact evidence on the side of the building where the wings, tail and engines would have struck. Just a sixteen foot hole at ground level that was very reminiscent of the damage I had seen before caused by a cruise missile impacting a building. Engines on these aircraft do not DO NOT pulverize into nothingness. I saw nothing on site that resembled the many crash sites I have observed in the past.

[@aussiegirl3473]

TY imho this is a doctored video to PUSH AN AGENDA !!!

[@baselbob8012]

Did you watch to the end? Lost of airplane debris. And where are the people that were on the plane if not dead? We can just fake their deaths and the relatives would not confirm it was a hoax. Early QAnon I guess ..

[@bliaher1582]

How about the passengers?

[@jimbo1959]

Completely agree! None of it lines up.The 747 is 63 feet high, and the hole in the wall was 16ft. The earth in front of the hole was UNTOUCHED??? That's impossible! I've also been to crash sites of DC9's, and the crater it made is massive, plus there was " Airplane Parts " everywhere. NO plane hit the Pentagon, and I do not believe that the " EMPTY " hole was the crash site of flight 93.

[@l7846]

​@bliaher1582 Collateral damage. Easy-peasy. Be assured: those willing to foist this level on an entire world, would have not a moment of hesitation about expendables.

[@craftygirl1104]

So the whole airplane was able to be completely blocked by a 2 ft box? 🤔

[@craftygirl1104]

Where is the footage between the block and the building?

[@mooneyes2k478]

Because distance and perspective is hard?

[@pazuzu66.6]

Yeah that’s how perspective works lmao, if you put hand in front of your eyes you could block the son, doesn’t mean the sun is smaller than your hand

[@johndoee4964]

You transitioned the cartoon animated plane's tail into a tree line that was there before and after the explosion. When slowed down there is no shadow of a 757 and there are frames missing from the video. The frame right before impact is completely gone. Actually 3-4 frames are completely gone.

[@mooneyes2k478]

Making things up isn't an argument. Then again, since you admitted you're a bot, that's not a surprise I suppose.

[@petercotterill5105]

Before seeing this simulation I would have expected a plane hitting a heavily reinforced wall to burst into flames and disintegrate on contact rather than passing straight through it. Thank you for correcting my misconceptions.

[@joeythecat6334]

I'm pretty sure it was reinforced after the attacks

[@joeythecat6334]

@Fernando García salazar True, unless it hits a moose, that'll destroy it /j

[@neilhardie6312]

It did disintegrate. All in all the damage to the Pentagon was minor

[@britneyspearsupdates]

That side pf the pentagon was the most prepared for an attack, there was remodeling going on like a few months prior.

[@lionofjudea4146]

Awesome piece of work Mike, thanks! :--)

[@curtisnielsen9540]

This may of been one of the first videos on youtube!

[@UnkleKnuck]

Facts

[@Highcard556]

Not

[@NimbleV7]

not even close

[@sinekonata]

Lamp pole #2 is what caused the damage to cab. The cab stopped at pole 1 but it was hit by part of pole 2 then had to stop, stop distance at 70km/h is about the same distance than between pole 1 and 2. There is another animation around, which depicts this correctly. Can't remember which.

[@mattydigs]

How did smoke have time to billow out of the damaged engine in less than a second?

[@starryeyedrealist]

+Mattydigs smoke billowed out of the damaged engine,,,,what should it do??

[@mattydigs]

***** The plane is moving super fast. It wouldn't have had time to 'billow' smoke before impact.

[@starryeyedrealist]

Mattydigs why not honey pie ??

[@mattydigs]

***** Because from the damage to the engine to the impact, that all happened in less than a single second, buttercup ;) Maybe there was some smoke (though doubtful).. but billowing? I don't think so.

[@mattydigs]

***** I did, calm down, buttercup. That could also be a rocket or missile. I don't care what the camera shows if the official story they try to match with it defies physics, logic, and reality. Don't be upset at me be upset at the government who chose to only release 1 shitty feed from a heavily watched, highly secure area, which is the reason why all of us are even here on this vid in the first place.

[@todd5082]

I wish u would animate other crashes like this. 👍 Well done sir.

[@heftyhugh9086]

A plane still didn't hit the Pentagon.

[@todd5082]

@@heftyhugh9086 crack is wack. So which nut job conspiracy theory r u pushing? Missile, bomb, or an old lady hit it with her car? I knew people who were at the Pentagon during the attack. They said the strong smell of jet fuel was nauseating. Aircraft parts, landing gear, etc. Even multiple light poles were knocked down from the jet’s wings all caught on security cameras.

[@americawhereareyou]

@@todd5082 Ha ha ha... Yeah Bruh, I am sure you knew people. LOL Please show us the videos that captured the plane hitting light poles. I bet the people you knew have them. LOL. Are you outright lying or misinformed? Those videos dont exist. Also the impeller shaft is indestructible in the Prat & Whitney JT9D, the GE CF6, or the Rolls Royce RB21. One would expect any or at least one of the FOUR would be plastered to the Pentagon wall. But we are expected to believe the wings folded up and were sucked into the hole?

[@engine5]

yes it did lmao. you're delusional.

[@legosinaviation]

@@heftyhugh9086too bad so sad keep living in your own delusional world

[@ernestj5740]

I would love to hear the opinions from commercial pilots to see if this is something a non experienced person can do, and at what speed would this plane would have to be traveling to avoid a stall? was this plane traveling at close to landing speed? and wouldn't the camera have been able to capture anything that might resemble a plane at the speed it was traveling?

[@RipCityEagle]

It must have been pure luck. If he had another shot he probably plummets into the ground

[@yourbadger5486]

ALL of the hijackers were trained in American flight schools. This particular hijacker had a commercial pilots license and recorded over 300 hours on a dual engine flight sim.

[@britneyspearsupdates]

They had prior training years before.

[@bickleyjonas6145]

​@@yourbadger5486Just for this day. The dedication is unfathomable.

[@thequeensandking7006]

Thank you so much! You helped me with my report!

[@bloozedaddy]

I just came here to read the responses from the Crazies.

[@theraiden1018]

we're crazy yet you believe that the pentagon swallowed a commercial airliner without any photographic evidence? sometimes i wonder if bonehead comments like yours are from government plants

[@eikh1682]

@@theraiden1018 Oh noses, Another Truther speaks from his brainwashed brain.

[@theraiden1018]

Eikh impeccable argument. U really changed my perspective with all your evidence

[@eikh1682]

Took me a minute to respond since I didn't even understand you.

[@Yorker1998]

@@theraiden1018 You idiot, we found landing gear, American Airline markings, turbine engines, 757 rims, etc at the crash site. This CLEARLY matches that of an airliner. Case closed.

[@theshillkilleronyt2298]

Mr./Mrs. Salmonfaky, I am glad you took the time to come up with such an informative and thoughtful post. Did it take you long to come up with that?

[@justicepartyuk]

It was controlled demolition job

[@thetruth1273]

Let us never tolerate malicious lies served in the name of science to shift away from the guilty. 911 inside job planned mass murder and high treason.

[@blackhatfreak]

lmaoooooooooooooooooooooooo no

[@JohnQuilyQuinlan]

2:58 that pole just appears?or am I imagining that too

[@alvaroprieto2092]

That's the gate lifted.

[@JohnQuilyQuinlan]

@@alvaroprieto2092 ah ok cheers

[@ScrewFearMe]

wait wait wait wait wait... so the security camera catches 4 pictures of the "plane" crashing into the pentagon but when its over its FULL speed camcorder? wow thats blowing my mind how they wanna control that image right there

[@Sharky2055]

Wrong, the footage that's been shown is CCTV footage of a plane flying 535 mph so the footage has been extremely slowed down

[@ScrewFearMe]

still frames missing

[@mikosoft]

oh come on. You are not that stupid. Go watch the footage again and you WILL find out why it looks full speed.

[@americawhereareyou]

@@Sharky2055 Baby shark, do-do, do-do. Baby shark do-do, do-do. Baby shark do-do, do-do. Baby shark.

[@TWEAKLET]

@@americawhereareyou oh god no

[@donizetti1217]

Pentagon most protected building in the Globe and only one video camera caught the event. Mmmmm? Mmmmm

[@tonyleger219]

Based on what? I just did a check on the most heavily guarded locations on earth. The Pentagon did not show up on a single list! Any conspiracy that could make a plane full of people disappear into thin air could certainly fake a video of that meant anything.

[@fastica]

Look at it the other way around. If you have to be part of a conspiracy would you release only one video? Wouldn't you release something else to make it look more real?

[@tonyleger219]

Federico Astica For starters, I would have just crashed the plane into the Pentagon. That would be a heck of a lot easier than making it disappear into another dimension with everyone on board and going through all the trouble of having a missile fired and perfect secrecy! The conspiracy theories in this one are about as insane as you can get.

[@Mads-hl8xj]

+Tony Leger: Did your searchresult tell that pentagon got Antiaircraft stations placed around the area ? Not even Fort Knox got that...

[@tonyleger219]

Mads Oh, add way more people into your massive, impossible conspiracy. So, now all those troops who would have been manning the weapons were also brought into this conspiracy and have kept perfect secrecy!! Well, that is not as hard as making an airliner full of people disappear into thin air!!!

[@armenian_cartographer_neo]

Now , I 100% do not think that the plane did not hit the Pentagon

[@norcalskateparksbombardier9281]

Notice the pictures of the tail Wing stabilizer, perfectly intact and somewhat sticking out of the building. Yet the known pictures of the impact site don't show any tail Wing or stabilizer. They're so desperate to prove their narrative.

[@flyzerogravity]

Oh sure somebody with no commercial flying experience could pull off a maneuver like this and then defy physics and fit into a 16’ hole and no 8,000 lb engine damage visible and yet it punctures through all layers of the Pentagon and then vanished... in a neocons dream it could happen.

[@EdgemanLL2]

Because youre stupid, let me explain. Crashing a plane is not a difficult maneuver. Its really pretty easy.

[@Q1776Q]

@@EdgemanLL2 To fly at the height they supposedly did..without hitting the ground...is EXTREMELY DIFFICULT. I have flown 10 feet off the deck for about 3000' several times... a novice would almost surely hit the ground...especially with all the inertia when descending

[@waspsfriend8577]

He was a trained pilot...

[@KRT054]

There was only one turbine photographed at the Pentagon of a type made by Raytheon Corporation, and not of a type made by Boeing Corporation. This photo has been harder to find on the Internet over the years, but it does exist.

[@operationmockingbirdresurr7341]

A Raytheon EA-3B Skywarrior, tail number N874RS painted in American Airlines Flight 77 scheme with plane's landing gear down attempted a Category IIIc [landing] expelling an AGM-12c Bullpup missile split seconds before crashing into Wedge One of the U.S. Naval Command Center. The target was the U.S. Naval Command Center because it was the link to the Commander in Chief and its destruction was imperative to overthrow the US government.

[@redlineducks]

Nicely done. Thanks for dispelling myths and conspiracy theories. Such a tragedy and senseless act of terror. Any other conclusion is baseless fiction. Time to move on and work to make the world safe from such acts of insanity.

[@fastfootedone]

nothing was dispelled here

[@americawhereareyou]

Why are family members and members of the press who were finally allowed to listen to the tape of the cockpit voice recorder NOT allowed to listen to its last three minutes? Why were these same press and family members legally barred from taking notes or receiving a copy of the tape recording? Why has that tape not been made public for the rest of us to hear and scrutinize? Why do we just sit here and take these decrees and declarations from the 'authorities' when it is they who work for and stand accountable to us? We as a nation believe in and stake claim to a free, open, democratic, orderly, and accountable society. In what way are we demanding, exercising, and animating these rights?

[@whyohwhyfools]

Over 7 million views!!!! Well done Mr Wilson.

[@TrutherRD2D]

I bet 10,000 of those views are yours alone and your still fucking stupid lololol

[@MrWhaatay]

I believe this story. The smoke, which was much smaller than the size of the plane, is the onky thing that can be seen in the video. This means the lamp poles vaporized the rest of the plane and all that was left and struck the Pentagon was the smoking engine. This would account for the small entry hole and lack of plane parts. It makes total sense to me now.

[@TrutherRD2D]

Whatatay T

[@MrWhaatay]

Sharky2055 I believe this story. If it weren't true you would have seen people carrying out a large mysterious tarp covered crate as if they were trying to hide and remove the remains of a missile. You would have also seen a line of people walking shoulder to shoulder to find the smallest remains of a missile to hide the truth.

[@Sharky2055]

Whatatay T That's laughable. There was NO missile! There was a Boeing 757!

[@NeverOwned]

Sharky2055 dont you mean "that`s laughable" edit that shit.

[@whatevernoticed]

Whatatay T obviously you did not watch the video, because if you did, you would not come with such nonsense...

[@paulbryson111]

The generator damage confirms it for me. A rocket or bomb couldn't do that, only a plane wing clipping the top of it. Conspiracy theorists are funny though😂😂

[@TLO129]

Agreed

[@nighthawk7863]

@josh what?

[@Dibbles2005]

@@nighthawk7863 what he is saying is, if a missle hit the generator it would explode on impact.... Duhhh

[@nighthawk7863]

@@Dibbles2005 I don't know why I put that comment there anymore lol

[@Suikogiru]

Agreed

[@whyohwhyfools]

I think it's time to call the Clark residence again and ask WillyMa and WillyPa what they think about their sons behaviour.

[@dr.timothypatitsas7889]

I was in Washington, DC that day. That night, I picked up a friend to get her safely back to her parents in another state. On the way out, I decided to swing by the Pentagon and see it closer. As we went south, you could see that the fire was still going really big. We got off at an exit and re-entered the highway going north - maybe 7 minutes elapsed until we were again abreast of the Pentagon. Somehow, the fire was now twice as big, really frightening. This was around 9 p.m. or so - 12 hours approximately after the crash. Consequently, I have always accepted the explanation that a large airliner fully fueled made the impact. For the fire to still be growing that much later, the scale of the fire, and the color of the smoke - that was no missile. I can't imagine how an amateur pilot was able to fly that low without crashing into the ground, but somehow they did. I pray for the souls of all those victims who died.

[@BoeingRules100]

You would need to be a very skilled pilot to keep the plane that close to the ground for that long without one or both of the engines digging into the ground and cartwheeling before it even hit the building

[@hoodieso8858]

You just need to keep it steady. At the last few seconds increase the throttles to maximum power.

[@sfsen]

It's called landing. But zero skills needed for crashing while touching down. Hijacker's aim must have been to land anywhere close to the pentagon at a minimum speed to reach the pentagon. But the conspiracy theorists' way of thinking is for a skilled pilot to replicate a wrong landing exactly the way in the report, which in and of itself is laughable. Remember, plenty of witnesses for the plane, including a priest, and zero witnesses for a missile.

[@ne1sail]

Why did it take 15 years for this video to come out when it could have been done in the first few months? Why did it take 14 years for photographs showing parts of the aircraft inside the building? When one looks at the physical damage to the building exterior, explain how a 757 can fit through a 16 foot hole? Engines, landing gear, everything except for a few parts scattered for effect? Why is the compressor assembly shown is not from that family of aircraft? All the early photographs released show no fire damage inside the pentagon. Computer aided design is fine for making the impossible possible. Prior to the collapse of the building, all the windows where the wings and engines would have struck are all unbroken? Since the light pole crashed through the taxi front window, why is there not a mark on the hood where the operator supposedly pulled the light poll out. Where are the body parts or medical reports? Where is the autopsy results for any of the crew or passengers? Anyone can use Photoshop to hide or alter anything. Your cartoon is to little, to late.

[@whatevernoticed]

+James Svos it did not take 15 years for this video to come out. It also did not take 14 years for the pentagon pictures to get released. But even if it was, what is your point> And did even bother to watch the video you are posting at? Because if you did, you would have notice that the 16 ft hole is a myth created by the truther movement in order to make their alternative more appealing. All the early pictures show what the inferno has done inside the pentagon. The section even collapsed! Why on earth would you decide to believe there was no fire damage? And if you really looked at the pictures of the pentagon, you would have seen that the engines and wings completely knocked out the outer wall. Not just the windows. And yes, there is a mark on the hood of the taxi. It has a large dent in it. Again, i don't believe you even took a look at pictures of the taxi yourself. And since you argue that everything can be faked, why would you want to see personal data about the victims?

[@geo6892000]

+James Svos - Yes the official story is a complete joke

[@DrUndies]

A cruise missile could be modified to look like a smaller jet. They could fit wider wings . That could explain how light poles were knocked down. Aside from all the evidence or lack of it.~ the one AMAZING fact is that this 'terrorist' who could hardly fly a light aircraft let alone a jet liner ~ brought that plane into a spiral downwards trajectory and came in and hit the Pentagon perfectly like it was computer controlled. THAT is what I find very very hard to believe!

[@geo6892000]

......and if all that wasn't enough - then this novice pilot made all 140 tons of the plane, luggage, bodies, etc, disappear without a trace (through an 18 foot round hole at the base of the Pentagon)......without even scratching the lawn. Low enough to supposedly hit light poles hundreds of yards away but never hit the lawn. I'm still trying to wrap my head around the 120 foot wingspan and 40 foot high tail section all going through that 18 foot hole. Houdini would be impressed.

[@geo6892000]

Homeward bound - no one died on planes on 9/11 because there weren't any planes hijacked. The 'families' interviewed were actors playing their parts. The phone calls from the planes were faked, the crashes were faked. Any idiot looking at the Pentagon and Shanksville 'crashes' can clearly see there are no planes in the pictures of the crashes.

[@whyohwhyfools]

I have some good and bad news for Will Clark of Johnstown, PA, Age 34. Tell him to get in contact soon.

[@americawhereareyou]

The American Society of Civil Engineers states that the sole upward-thrust section of the second-floor floor slab in the alleged "plane penetration path" in Wedge One was likely due to *"an independent explosion" and not impact and fire,* as the official story claims that an impactor penetrated the ground floor essentially level and fire would have at the most, the report said, collapsed the second-floor floor slab downwards: *"The explosion, suggested by the raised second-floor section*, might represent an independent, *of any lateral impact* explosion." This second-floor concrete slab that was thrust upwards by a major force is, not surprisingly, above the first-floor Naval Command Center that experienced a massive and reported targeted explosion. Compare the location of the Naval Command Center with the location of the "independent explosion" that represents this upward-thrust second-floor slab, near the center of the alleged "plane penetration wedge."

[@Apollo-p1l]

,..,.No girlfriend? No job? Bullied at school? Parents been mean to you? Desperate for attention? Want to feel important and clever because you watched some youtube videos? CHOOSE 9/11 TRUTH. Helping inadequate people since 2001.

[@NeverOwned]

Girlfriend ✔ Job ✔ Bully at school ✔ Parents loved me ✔ Hate attention ✔ Important and clever ✔ _Shit, I guess I`m not a truther after all._

[@NeverOwned]

Yes and I forgot to mention , I have a *huge* pencil.

[@americawhereareyou]

***** Really? Like your claim of living in the lap of luxury? Where's the pool pics...?

[@AgeOfSuperboredom]

NeverOwned You'll have to forgive me for being skeptical about all of that, especially since you have Elliot Fucking Rodger as your avatar.

[@m0ner0thethird]

What a masterful pilot. He landed the plane and drove it into the Pentagon.

[@starryeyedrealist]

...............BACON SNACK BAR.............

[@waspanimations7037]

What is that even supposed to mean.

[@m0ner0thethird]

@@waspanimations7037 I don't remember

[@PrinceJohn84]

Love a good bacon sandwich does me 👍

[@Bacon_Editz4]

bro it was hijacker’s

[@craigklotz2321]

You showed us broken lamp poles. Can you please show us the broken pieces of the plane ? Can you show us the dents in the lamp poles along with paint chips from the plane ? Can you please turn in your credentials ?

[@pazuzu66.6]

The video literally shows debris from the plane, and paint on planes is not like paint on cars, if it was then with would fly off from flight

[@mooneyes2k478]

Guess not, huh? Much surprise.

[@midwestmomofeight]

Excellent forensic analysis.

[@twistedyogert]

I sort of expected parts of the wing to shear off when the plane hit the first lampost. At over 400mph I would assume that would be a pretty hard hit.

[@stuart2202]

I know this is an old comment, but I've seen alot of people saying things like this and would like to say, these lamp-posts are DESIGNED to pop out of the ground upon an impact from a car. Combining that with the extreme lightness of the post compared to the plane, it would cause denting at most.

[@vm9522]

Was that a recording from a security camera or a fucking potato???

[@FaithnotesCo]

The early 2000s were the age of potatoes

[@jimbo1959]

Exactly...a " Security Camera " from the most SECURE building in the World!! LOL!!

[@IsaiahPRK]

@@jimbo1959 from 2001. Look at cctv caneras now not much better

[@zenoist2]

Hi! I'm having awful problems with some security cameras I installed. Theyre the latest thing in technology and extremely expensive and my house is literally covered in them yet a burglar managed to break in and steal my property. I suppose the FBI turning up withing minutes and confiscating all the footage is why I can't get a clear photo of them? I want to prosecute the criminal but the lack of video footage is making it very difficult. They will not release this footage clearly pointing to the perpetrator despite repeated court orders and FOIA requests , I am fobbed off with it was a low flying goose that scooped everything up in its beak despite such a thing never happening in world history. Any ideas?

[@TheGreatRedrover]

You're kinda all over the place with this "joke" which is fitting because much like your Pentagon "conspiracy" I'm not sure what it is you actually think happened. Anyway, it's irrelevant since even if they released footage of the burglar/goose (?) you'd undoubtedly claim it was in some way "faked" I'm surprised you left this post up for 4 whole days

[@zenoist2]

***** The post is still there and the only joke is you.

[@l7846]

Please show the pictures taken immediately after impact, before the wall collapsed. Also. When do we get to see the security video from nearby businesses? Asking for a friend.

[@UzziHD]

Neveruary, 2099

[@mooneyes2k478]

Making up things that does not exist doesn't make for an argument. Not for you and not for your imaginary friend.

[@thailandthomas9185]

If this is true than why are they hiding the 82 other video's?

[@Sharky2055]

Thomas Duncan Why do you assume they're hiding them? Those "82" videos were confiscated by the FBI for the Moussoai. They were from different locations.

[@thailandthomas9185]

They admitted to confiscating 82 videos.If they have nothing to hide why won't they release them..

[@Sharky2055]

Thomas Duncan Those videos are for various times and places for the Moussoui trial, not the Pentagon.There are a few available for the Pentagon that show the 757 that hit the Pentagon.

[@waynejohnson1304]

Thomas Duncan Sharky is a paid Government shill. See how it's done here: www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=&oq=Government+shills&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4ACGW_enUS473US404&q=government+paid+shills&gs_l=hp..3.0l2j0i22i30l2.0.0.0.8685...........0.LChMEVTgtDM

[@Sharky2055]

***** Prove it, where's a paystub?!

[@DavidMiller-fu8mh]

Totally amazing that none of the grass or lawn was damaged with it flying that low to the ground 🤔

[@MFitz12]

The lawn was not hit, why would it be damaged?

[@waspanimations7037]

Did you not even look at the photos or watch the video at all?

[@lwilcox1124]

I am sure I will get all kinds of flack and insults for the statement I am about to make. I think the above video is right. I love a good conspiracy theory, but I don't believe that our Government flew a missile into the Pentagon.

[@lwilcox1124]

+unvrknow22 Well said and thank you.

[@streamsofconsciousness8651]

+Law1124 Neither do I, but it does beg the question as to why they don't put an end to this once and for all by releasing all of the confiscated CCTV footage from the time of the crash. You don't have to be a truther or conspiracy theorist to find that odd.

[@lwilcox1124]

+semiautoriflelover1 Exactly!!! Totally agree.

[@BobbyG-mt1sv]

Why? Seriously. I'm not trolling you. Especially now, with all of the seismic changes that have occurred in our nation alone, how can you say you don't believe "our" government would not open the 21st Century with a fundamentally world-changing series of events that erased history as we knew it in a matter of, quite literally, four or five hours? Why do you find this hard to believe? I'd like to understand where you're coming from on this.

[@11vinni11]

Law1124 u don't even realize that both sides of 9/11 require conspiracy....evidence leads to the one side, an it's not what they told us...

[@ericpenrose3541]

Showing a photo of an engine part that's not (as far as I can tell) a 757 engine part (from the high compressor) doesnt make it part of what it's supposed to be.

[@mooneyes2k478]

Making things up isn't an argument, you do know this?

[@ericpenrose3541]

There was various speculation that's what 'I can't evaluate it properly' means. But you look at the engine part, and tell me how it's a RB211. If so you'd be doing better than pilitsfor911truth. But you should be able to, as you say that's all "made up"

[@mooneyes2k478]

@@ericpenrose3541 Oh, also, here's a fun question for you: If you're right. If there wasn't a B757 that hit the Pentagon. If there was a "drone" or whatever you want to pretend.... Why hasn't Boeing stood up and said, "Nope, that's not one of our aircraft, and here's why"? It would, to say the least, be in their interest to do so, after all.

[@ericpenrose3541]

@@mooneyes2k478I'm not interested in replying to a non reply I asked a specific question you offer no answer to.

[@mooneyes2k478]

@@ericpenrose3541 So, in other words, you ducked out of having to face facts by pretending you're ever so hard done by, and it never happened so there! What a surprise.

[@KungfooJoey]

So nice to watch something without someone shouting out their opinion and just able to watch. The street lamps and generator prove something flew into that building shame we don't have more CCTV.

[@KungfooJoey]

Allan thank you for that, wow a lot to go through and I will definitely look at all the links. Thanks for taking the time.

[@ihateyoumother-fucker3204]

Your spot on. A missile wouldn't have done that . Something (with extreme speed and force) chopped those lamp posts down to the ground like trees. My own personal opinion is that, planes were used in that attack BUT who was actually in charge of the plane when it hit the building? I for one don't believe it was those hijackers. They were defiantly on the plane, but I can't help but think someone (at some point) hijacked the plane's computer system(s) and guided the plane to to it's target. As one man in this post has already pointed out, "I've been driving for 10 years, but it's doesn't mean I can drive a racing car." PS: people that take part in sophisticated terrorism like this are usually academic and bright. There not street thugs as if it were. I find it hard to believe that these hijackers would have even agreed to undertake such a mission, never mind actually go and and attempt to do it, considering it's well known they only had basic flying lessons.

[@DerUfo]

The pentagons inside beams are bent in the direction of the impact. That is done by a object of weight and not by explosive force. Therefore by seeing the impact damage.. its clear its a airliner or large aircraft was responsible. Also the multiple (100+) witnesses to the event indicating a large aircraft hit the structure.. would also have to be accepted as truth, a small number might be a "Plot" but such a large number rules out that option. This however does not rule out Government duplicity it merely agrees with the stated facts of that a large aircraft hit this structure.

[@raphaeldavis522]

Pretty impressive flying for someone who just learned to fly. I'm not even sure if many seasoned pilots could've pulled that off...hmmm..

[@MFitz12]

Flyng a plane in a straight line towards a fixed object 5 times wider than a major airport runway. Yeah, how could any pilot do that? I suppose they don't teach WWII in school anymore. Hundreds of Japanese teenagers who had never even driven a car trained in 2 weeks to crash into moving ships that are shooting at them. But I suppose you never head of that.

[@MFitz12]

@Defund -Government Hanjour came into DC too high and too fast, forcing him in to a simple but roughly executed 330-deg decending turn, levelling out about 4 miles from the target. From there he just flew a straight line in a shallow descent.

[@Q1776Q]

@@MFitz12 Believe me..it is very difficult..and these guys had NEVER done it before...basically impossible

[@MFitz12]

@@Q1776Q - Pretty sure you only get one shot at this. Also, a ten year old could do it and have on a simulator. Not nearly as hard as you pretend.

[@Q1776Q]

@@MFitz12 I have done it...several times for about 3000'... 10 feet off the deck...with all the inertia from descending..it is EXTREMELY DIFFICULT. Until you try it in the real world..you have no idea

[@theshillkilleronyt2298]

Thats right. See Superfort, now you're talking.

[@HardWorkForFastCash]

This is a great video. Just one question was Whip flying this plane? 5 light poles, a generator, and you say the pilot still had a direct shot?

[@triangleman9997]

High level piloting. To fly 10 feet off the ground on your approach through obstacles is incredibly difficult. Miraculous

[@emperorzurg7258]

@@triangleman9997 Not that miraculous actually. He was going straight and down. It's only just before the impact that he was "10 feet off the ground".

[@calebmoneyhollis663]

@emperorzung7258 I always figured planes are really sensitive like driving a car without power steering and just one wrong dip send that plane into the highway. I think he’s the only hijacker of the other 4 that couldv’e pulled this off

[@philipfish50]

All that debris could have been stored in the pentagon where the planned explosion or missile was supposed to hit and the people picking up the debris up could just as easy be placing it on the ground

[@MFitz12]

Straws being clutched.

[@LarryJohnson-i7t]

My question is why we're they picking up debris the first day.

[@americawhereareyou]

Charlie Varrick collects dog poop at the local park and puts it into a plastic bag.... doesn't have a dog.

[@americawhereareyou]

Fuk Y00 doin these days?

[@americawhereareyou]

Crazy ChukeeVee a la Bernie CarpStinksLikeGin. Happy new year. :)

[@americawhereareyou]

Damn Bruh... you still full-on... 300%... Bat-Shit crazy. Ever think of this... (of course you didn't) Walls don't just keep things out, they keep them in too. Faux "News" is nothing but a shill for the Republican party. Duh. I have videos of Murdoch himself saying he used his influence to sell the Iraq war. Why would I watch that garbage? Where is the clan? Just Y00 anymore? Chukee Vee carries diapers, wipe's, and candy at the local park... doesn't have kids; Is looking for his "lost dog."

[@derryk1]

Unfortunately the further we get along from that day in 2001 the more conspiracy theory dingbats are born. Many of whom were just little kids when all of this happened too young to understand.

[@jonnyshelton8545]

the lying politicians bring it on themselves lie after lie war after war weapons of mass destruction show the plane hitting and shut them up if there wrong... oh yeah they can't....explain please too many things don't add up first three buildings to fall from fire in history and the were practising for that exact scenario as it happened....righto I buy that same in UK in 7/7 as the terrorists attack military exercise for a bus bombing??? come on reason stop parroting mainstream media it's depressing the terrorists aren't who they say they are the bigger agenda to turn Muslims and Christians against each other so they can cull the population it's never too long look at history were due a war and ppl better get wise or they've won powerful ppl conspire all the time thats how the government let the federal reserve print the money and turn us all into slaves of debt wake up America

[@jonnyshelton8545]

+Icicle Fledglings sounds like you missed it ALL go back to sleep it's easier ppl don't trust politicians weapons of mass destruction???all the death that followed that lie powerful ppl don't conspire?? why you got generations of slaves to the banking family's? cus the government isn't for the ppl anymore Kennedy wanted to print the money interest free for the ppl which is how it shud be look what happend to him sorry you don't get it but plenty do now so good luck trusting lying murderers

[@banyentertainment]

i am older than you and i know Kennedy was shot by the same unscrupulous people that orchestrated 9/11

[@derryk1]

Easily because when they do research they will come across many crackpot conspiracy theorist with their off the wall made up as they go nonsense. Same people who claim the moon landings were faked and the earth is flat, down is up and sideways is straight ahead. I could punch holes the size to run an ocean liner through with these so called theories but I don't have that much room here to type it all out nor do I feel like wasting my time trying to tell the truth to those who do not seek the truth just their own misinformation.

[@jonnyshelton8545]

+derryk1 you could punch a whole in the argument the size of the whole made by the plane we see hitting the pentagon.....oh shit we don't see it hit just the whole and you trust them why?? cus of the weapons of mass destruction ...oh wait a minute that wasn't true either....bare with me I know I could convince you your wrong to ask questions of known lier's but not got the room here... weirdos

[@americawhereareyou]

*I... am John Anderson.*

[@santiblondeee3582]

I only have once question. I’m pretty sure the pentagon has more than 100 cameras all around, so why only release one video where u can’t really see the airplane? Why do they confiscated all the videos around the business? Why they release so many videos of airplanes hitting the towers but not the pentagon? To me that’s just weird.

[@MFitz12]

Why are you "pretty sure the Pentagon has 100 cameras all around." On what factual basis do you make that claim, or is it pure conjecture and assumption? Cameras around where, specifically? Aimed at what, the sky? Why does it even matter? Don't need any camera footage to determine what happened. Why do you think the existence of so many vids of the South Tower being hit is weird? Every camera in the biggest city in the country and the hub of all the major TV news outlets was aimed at the Twin Towers when the 2nd plane struck. Why? Because the first plane had struck. Bit of a no brainer there. Expected, not unusual.

[@santiblondeee3582]

@@MFitz12 are you really even questioning the type of security of the pentagon? It is a fact and I’m not assuming.

[@MFitz12]

@@santiblondeee3582 I am questioning your assumptions about security at the Pentagon, which is obvious enough from my questions. Also pointing out the bleeding obvious that no video evidence is required.

[@waspanimations7037]

The pentagon is a huge building. Even 100 cameras wouldn't fill it.

[@americawhereareyou]

We know for a fact in pictures that there are/were TPZ cameras on every point on the roof of the Pentagon and in every hallway/doorway inside the building. Don't let morons try and tell you security at the Pentagon dont know where you are every second you are in the building. The fact that they released so little is suspect on its own.

[@NeverOwned]

Bernie, where have the debunkees that actually give their "real" name gone? Oh thats right, there arent any.

[@fukenbiker]

Better late than never I guess. Here I am. The missile that hit the Pentagon was not a hollow aluminum fuselage like an American cruise missile, as it is too flimsy to penetrate the building. Study 911thology by Dimitri Khalezov. The FBI knocked down the lampposts after the fact, in a hastily contrived coverup. We photos of the lampposts still vertical, one from the AP and the other is a recently released FBI photo from the FOIA lawsuits.

[@americawhereareyou]

@@fukenbiker Odd you'd reply to a 5 year old comment. David you would be a conspiracy theorist. A "Debunkee" back in the period NeverOwned posted this comment, were vile vermin that trolled around this video trying desperately to prove the official conspiracy theory put forth by the Government. Odd after all this time I'd click on this video again and have NO's comment up at the top along with another 6 year old comment.

[@fukenbiker]

@@americawhereareyou

[@TootieBuns]

Can someone help answer some questions for me? 1. why did the USA let the planes fly around for so long, and fly into NYC and the Pentagon... isn't that supposed to be restricted airspace? 2. why do the videos of the planes hitting the towers look so fake? they just sort of melt into the building with no debris flying off or anything... 3. what happened to the plane in PA, there was no wreckage or luggage or anything left at the site 4. how do 3 big buildings made of structural steel just collapse from top to bottom, suddenly? I haven't done a lot of research into this but it seems totally obvious that this was a military plot done by the USA and the western intelligence agencies... besides how did it benefit Muslims in any way at all? It didn't. plus why has the government not showed the people the video footage of the Pentagon crash? It seems important and if it happened then they should show us the videos. What is there to hide? I would appreciate any mature responses and answers please, not the weird insults like I see from so many people below thanks....

[@TootieBuns]

***** uh ok... why are there so many losers on these 911 pages? I'm trying to ask serious questions here... are you one of these official story believers? I fail to see the humor in your response...

[@skuilcrusherghost1692]

***** YOU HAVE EXTRA, YOU NO PIIGG IT ALL UP SLURP SLURP?

[@TootieBuns]

***** what?? a shill? Holy shit, you're fucking crazy...

[@TheHAARPfacility101]

Shitty Mistress I don't know if you if you realized this yet, but I want you to just scroll through the comments really quick. Look at every single one of them. Notice how some of these same people have been here sitting on this video attacking those who question the governments side of the 911 story for years? It's almost like they are being forced to come here daily, and filter out comments right? Seriously take the time to look at this, and you will see that it is self-evident. You will begin to notice that this kind of thing happens everywhere regarding sensitive topics that people would feel ridiculed to speak out against.It's a strawman technique meant to cause an illusive disposition. Woo Breaker is the biggest strawman of them all. There is no telling just exactly how many other accounts commenting on this particular video belong to him. With that said how about we make the shills do their job? There are far more important topics to shed light on, and it will be easier for them to throw out the ''tin foil hat'' term to deeper subject matter such as this. newsinsideout.com/2014/12/investigator-cia-pope-john-paul-ii-bush-sr-jr-billhillary-clinton-ritual-child-sacrifice/ www.angelfire.com/ut/branton/THE_DULCE_BATTLE.htm The people that they want you to think are crazy / uneducated do a way better job of persuading us critical thinkers with an abundance of information instead of trying to Deny, Degrade, and Deceive which would be the way of the shill.

[@TootieBuns]

Trevor Philips Thank you Trevor, I did notice that certain people post comments here like a dozen times daily. I could only scroll through a few months of this nonsense. It's really depressing because of the weird and repetitive insults... as far as 911 goes I think it is obvious that the governments of the West were involved. Clearly this was not a "foreign attack" but I have a hard time getting through the bullshit to find out what really DID happen. I think I'll just seek my answers elsewhere, thanks for your comment.

[@whimantlers7919]

Why is there so many new account holders with blank channels that won't even share the date they joined You Tube. To me, it looks like many new debunker sock puppets, huh?

[@nancyjefferis9911]

Ok. Now I get it. Thanks for the demo.

[@joeythecat6334]

?

[@mrjames3817]

mr whyowhyfools, I dont wear a wig. this photo was taken the year before I met suzan and I still had my hair and good looks. within months of meeting suzy my hair had all but fallen out

[@rossauce12]

What the heck are you talking about or to who? A lil late to the game

[@jaredk1979]

Excellent video. If anyone is still a "truther" after watchinh this then they're so fucking stupid you'll never reach them. I have a feeling a lot of these people also believe the earth is flat.

[@NeverOwned]

Excellent observation. I see no one has subscribed to your channel, so I`ll be the First. Yay Jared!

[@seedplanter7173]

Boy howdy, that was some seriously incriminating debris from an airliner, I like how they showed the same piece from three different angles to make it seem like there was more than what was there. Call me stupid because all this does is add more suspicion to the (cant release any video footage and had to confiscate surrounding videos) official story. I believe you are the one who cant be reached..

[@seedplanter7173]

***** This ain't Israel boy.! Cognitive dissonance

[@NeverOwned]

You guys wondering where everyones at? Red is at his studio finishing his latest album. Woo is locked in the basement of Omega house being beaten with a wooden paddle Papen is at her mothers house because jimmi is doing the sexy intern at work. Jackie is still hanging out at the truck stop where they have communal showers.

[@NeverOwned]

What would be the correct way to say that? I write like i talk, which isnt correct english and I dont give a shit. lol

[@NeverOwned]

***** Well, it makes sense to me. I doubt going to an english class would help me at this stage of my insanity. But yeah, jiMMi will dump you soon, bad investment.

[@NeverOwned]

***** "must not have had" Looks good. Just like "could have" instead of "could of" Thanks and feel free to proofread my comments in the future.

[@NeverOwned]

He`ll probably wait till your kids are legal age. Its going to happen, Papen. Sorry,

[@americawhereareyou]

Pee prattled on and on: _"Why would anyone want to divorce a woman like me? You've seen my photo and its fine. Why would a man leave me? come on, this is going to be good."_ - Um... we've seen your photo... define fine. Um... because... y00... are y00... nuff said.

[@mattskey58]

Some of These photos are from a small engine aircraft ...not a major airliner...