All Fundamental Forces and Particles Explained Simply | Elementary particles

The standard model of particle physics (In this video I explained all the four fundamental forces and elementary particles)
To support on patreon (video script with high-res art works) : / klonusk975
Contact : [e-mail]
#standardmodel #force

[@kumarswamymc433]

I am a medical professional, I love physics, particularly quantum physics, for the past several years I am interested in Physics, I had seen lots of videos on particle physics,but your video is so, clear , simple and lucid , easy to understand, very informative thanks for the wonderful video 🙏🙏🙏👏👏👏

[@CraigPendlebury]

The single best and most exhaustive video of this kind. I had so many "ah ha" moments watching this, THANK YOU

[@michaelkirkpatrick494]

I have been studying and trying to understand as much as I can about quantum mechanics. This is by far the clearest, most comprehensive, and best explanation of fundamental particles that I have come across. You have earned my subscription. Cheers!

[@Joyly-the-Oliy-Doly]

this video has a very comprehensive description and contains a lot of facts! One of the best scientific videos I've seen!

[@k.dhinesh8938]

15:18 in this point, a minor correction. Actually, in beta plus decay, proton decays into neutron, positron and a neutrino (not another neutron)

[@everythingforyou8188]

Exactly

[@rivercox8172]

Came to the comments to check this. I knew it was wrong, and i figured this was the answer, thanks for the confirmation!

[@aungkyawkhant321]

At 15:16 the W+ boson actually decays into a positron and a "neutrino" I think there was a small error there, but all in all, great video!

[@rulo9647]

Common W boson (im funny i swear)

[@knowlegdeaccount]

GOOD JOB BROOOOO

[@abubakarawan1926]

I m Physicist, actually to gain stability according to condition Proton Decays To Neutron with extraction of W+ boson and than Boson Decays As positron and Nutrino

[@ellonganiza]

This is so far the best explanation I´ve seen. Thank you!

[@MrOffTrail]

The Higgs boson was nicknamed the “God particle” as a bowdlerization. Originally, Leon Lederman had nicknamed it the “Goddamn particle” due to its elusiveness. It turned out to require a much more powerful particle accelerator to detect than was hoped, and wouldn’t be detected until the building of the LHC. Lederman wrote a book in 1993, intending it to be called “The Goddamn Particle”. It was a history of particle physics from ancient philosophers through to the then current search for the frustratingly elusive Higgs boson. However, as the book was intended for a popular audience, his publisher forced him to change the name to the less colorful “ The God Particle”. This introduced a connection to religion in many laypeople’s minds that still bothers physicists, or it inspires folk etymologies such as the video’s author has invented or taken from an incorrect source.

[@poppyseed7639]

Thank you for this video. I’ve been all over the internet looking for a clear explanation, but it’s the only explanation that resonates with me so far

[@douglaswatt1582]

Not a bad introduction to levels of organization but it leaves out the really interesting story of emergent properties

[@rivercox8172]

Any recommendations as to where i can learn more about the emergent properties?

[@atiqrahman7289]

My GOD--- Atoms and Sub-Atomic particles--- so much detailed sub-atomic world. Heck, mind-boggling.

[@Sree4991]

This is one of the best channel I have ever seen in KZbin when it comes to the science. I have watched all of your videos. This channel deserves more subscribers. Thank you so much for your work, Keep it up.

[@judelog1381]

I really enjoyed your video, I learned much more from this video than I did from my teacher in 2 months. Just one minor correction: @15:15 You say that a W+ boson decays into a positron and neutron, this is incorrect. A W+ boson decays into and positron and an electron neutrino.

[@zane003]

Thanks I was surprised and started taking notes thinking something interesting is about to come up.. need a correction to the video..

[@zane003]

wikipedia says about W+ decay: "proton is converted into a neutron by the emission of a positron with a neutrino"

[@gowri1991]

Brilliantly elucidated video on a very complicated subject!! Keep up the good work. Looking forward to many more similar videos from you.

[@atiqrahman7289]

Yes this is very complex indeed. ---- and fascinating as well. How a human being has gotten capable of knowing so complex and profound biochemistory inside NATURE PARTICLES. Amazin and SUPERB.

[@ThanQRadu]

Helical Particle Waves maybe the answer :)

[@mohammadkhadiv4921]

I love the way that you explain everythin step by step, it let me concentrate on subject and conclude. keep going I'm a fan of your works ✌✌✌✌

[@FelixErn.]

I really think that this channel is so underrated. Keep um the great work ❤

[@asifiqbal8653]

This is by far the best illustration of standard model.. take a bow

[@meshkathossain7066]

This is not my field but the way you have explained it really makes me good sense. Thank you for this video.

[@morpheus1988curitiba]

@ 15:18 I believe that here it’s a “Neutrino” and a positron instead of a “Neutron” and a positron as informed!

[@flo.9908]

i know your views arent that much, but please never stop your videos are really really well made and so cool to watch

[@alberteinstein6052]

Loved the pictorial symbolism at 18:25 where the proposed graviton didn’t stick to the board of elementary particles and just falls down , probably due to gravity

[@lokajay]

You create awesome content bro and your explanation is so good !

[@debilista]

More than i learned in half a year at school, so much information that these specific pieces of knowledge fit each other giving a comparably full picture. I hated school for having to memorize particular pieces of knowledge without further explanation why is it so. Man, this video is santa arriving early.

[@SHATOSHI123]

Love this man, I wanted to know about them in easy way since I heard of them on my middle school. Thanks a bunch man❤️

[@phanikumarnaidudevineni8224]

Beautiful explanation.

[@ziongeneration8145]

Thank you this really helps

[@atiqrahman7289]

MY GOD, SO amazing is all this.

[@Leoo___]

Excellent video! But please maybe in a later video explain exactly how each of the particles spins work! There is a huge lack of content on the exact details of how particles “spin” and you could do very well out of it! Please make a video on “spin”👍

[@nursima5028]

very helpful!! thank you

[@DjimmyTrovy]

What a great video. Thank you.

[@user-ep7wk3oz1i]

Thank you sir , You are really great.

[@Sparkl1ngM1lk]

when you explained how the quarks' charges equal to the charges of the protons and neutrons, I had such an "awe" moment that i audibly gasped.

[@business_strategy1]

Amazing video, continue please

[@NeoHomoSapien]

Best explanation 👏🏻👏🏻 thank you 🙏🏻🙏🏻

[@sumaiyaseif3500]

this is very helpful thank you

[@shubhammangalam8100]

Great videos , keep making such videos

[@thoughty2fan278]

New follower , excellent video

[@M1zarr]

Great video!!! I love videos about physical quantum😍

[@adriansiebenrock-xr4hf]

Very good video!!

[@parodynx]

before this video everything felt complicated. Thanks for simplifying it for me!

[@jimx45]

Still confusing and might have to watch more than once but this is good information.

[@Dragon.gaming_]

Thankyou for explaining the standard model of universe and what those particles mean.

[@Grandunifiedcelery]

Nice Video‼

[@Ava-km7tl]

What did I do to get lucky enough to learn about this stuff in my lifetime? Life is magical ❤

[@felixkramer8946]

So good !

[@2FDEditz]

This person is claims a nobel prize

[@ShiyamalaMarimuthu]

Wow amazing.. 🤩👏

[@abi_952k]

Amazing 🤩

[@MukhitAzimkhan]

tank you this videos brilliantly tank you author

[@ShadowPlasma832]

I have a printed version of a standard table of elementary particles but this is the best explanation. Sub to this channel.😊😊

[@spironedits]

Make more videos! i began to like your videos very quickly I hope you make many brains braining 😂

[@user-mu6ed4dx5f]

This channel is simply amazing and beautiful, just as its explanations. It deserves to have a larger public with such a good work being done in every video. Keep up with this pace and consistency, please. PD: could the next video be about quantum field theory?).

[@Lokeshgowda2023]

Super Amezing 🎉🎉🎉

[@studentamir4930]

I love it clear consise i won't fail

[@Twofiddymill]

Whenever I hear we know something, I always think’ that we know so far’

[@shameem-gy1pm]

New subscriber.

[@sarala8044]

I got all my answers from this in vedio . 🎉

[@john15399]

i finally understand E=mc^2

[@atiqrahman7289]

So complex is all this.

[@algirdasltu1389]

Well ofc this is one of the least researched fields and it happens on such small scales too

[@ExtratoneJunky]

When it comes to these heavier quarks, the top quark actually does not last long enough in order to form particles with any other quark, making it the only quark that is isolated. Top quarks also have a mas of about 173000 MeV when the proton itself has a mass of 938 MeV. The bottom quark also lasts longer than the top quark and is not as massive and is able to form particles

[@AtomicVerseOfficial]

Today, I was questioning how a neutron turns into a proton and releases an e- in the process, it seemed to me like an atom randomly disappearing (which is not possible btw). And also, I am 15 and still understood this very easily (probably wouldn't understand a word in a lecture on a black-/whiteboard). Anyway, great video, I hope one day I can make videos like these myself.

[@ambinaGirly]

Wonderfully done very informative and helpful though one minor issue I noticed is when depicting the gluons they formed a triangle between the 3 quarks but much in reality we’ve discovered they actually form a Y shape but common mistake so is all good

[@zarkforever5715]

15:16 Was it supposed to be a nutrino instead of a neutron?...

[@divaneeR]

nice clip ngl man

[@jacksonroy8720]

7:38 Actually, the strong nuclear force maintains the same magnitude on the quark as it gets pulled away. It doesn't get stronger like a spring or rubber band. Granted, it still takes a large amount of work to remove the quark fully from the structure, and for most people the difference in how the force is exerted between the two is inconsequential.

[@davecullins1606]

For once a physics video that doesn't confuse me!

[@rehanmohammad5841]

😂

[@ShadowPlasma832]

I am actually a teen but have been interested in scientific stuff since my younger ages.

[@esstown]

Yes, at 15:14 there's a mistake in the diagram and the voice-over. You meant to say it decayed into a neutrino and a positron (not into a neutron and a positron).

[@dahliabatache3861]

17:27 doesn’t the baryon made of the top top bottom quarks turn into a proton since it’s +2/3+2/3-1/3=+1? Also isn’t the electric field of an electron supposed to be centripetal like towards the center?

[@algirdasltu1389]

We started radiation, fission and fusion in hs and i always wondered how do you determine what type of beta decay happens to a specific atom.

[@farzamimran3960]

can u do a video on maxwells equations too?

[@Klonusk]

👍🤝

[@PYRO_CREATIONS]

I have a question.. is the mass of a quark 100% accurate??.. 2.4 MeV? Cuz I tried to convert it into Kg but I got a different answer compared to google..

[@anodominate]

" We humans are the most intelligent creatures known to have ever appeared in this universe. " 0:00 Quite a bold statment to assume or say.

[@bbhrdzaz]

We humans are the most intelligent creatures that WE (humans) have observed to exist in this universe, until we observe differently

[@aracoixo3288]

🌌 5:05

[@kwccoin3115]

Muon is not just in accelerator. In fact used as a major example of special relativity in that context for time or space dilution or contraction. Higgs is only responsible for 1/10 or less mass. Majority is due to symmetry breakdown …

[@kushagra1611]

Quantum Mechanical theory pls❤

[@user-gr3oo5ux9x]

Just because life is a dream does not mean everything is going to be all roses

[@svajojantiytgt4772]

That's a really great video, huge thanks for it! But I don't understand one part. When you explain how neutron becomes a proton in order to be stable, you say that the down quark emits a W boson with a - 1 charge and then becomes an up quark, a quark that has the charge of +2/3. But how does -1 W boson change down quark's charge to 2/3 and not -4/3??

[@erenkasimfirtina7870]

I couldn't this part of the video '' how does a proton get this extra mass from? and after explanation is saying that the energy between quarks converts into mass when we measure it. ??

[@ManyHeavens42]

15:15 Im glad the Dumb particles Are separated By the 5 Level accions ,Otherwise We would be there Slaves, 👈🐎👉🃏🧭♦️🕯️🌨️

[@haipingcao2212_.]

How many baryons can you make with _quarks_ ?

[@gosnooky]

The funny thing about AI speech generation is you know where the typos were in the copy. It said "noble prize" instead of "Nobel prize."

[@Chrisbajs]

2:58 You forget to say "divided by C squared."

[@khantxinpi5140]

15:10 mass of up quark is 2.4MeV.mass of down quark is 4.7MeV.So,in nuclear fusion,where does mass(energy) to change up quark to down quark come from?

[@RockerProf]

Great, except one comment. At 15:16, W+ bosons decay into a positron and a neutrino, not a neutron.

[@aracoixo3288]

❤🎉😮 13:16

[@gd44481]

You should be more popular

[@EnnaRagashiyam]

❤

[@AbulkalamAzad-qz1vv]

❤❤❤

[@irithel-qy7db]

While the neutron turns into a proton in the weak interaction, the negatively charged down quark inside the neutron emits its negative charge together with the w-boson, becomes positively charged in its internal structure and becomes an up quark, thus transforming into a neutron. turns into a proton. Is this true?

[@KartikPatel-nt4ff]

😅😮😮😅😮😅😅well information good show you 😅😅😅

[@superearth5256]

Please can you make video on heisenberg uncertainty principle

[@Klonusk]

👍🤝

[@scottydu81]

I'm not sure

[@ravisinghrathore6163]

Never had such a clarity🫡⚛️ Thanks a lott✨

[@tenzinchogyel3264]

post moreeee

[@eustab.anas-mann9510]

"We have never found an isolated quark." I'm pretty sure a Top quark always comes isolated.

[@aracoixo3288]

❤🎉😮

[@arunkumar_in_google]

I think 4 quark particle found already

[@chethanburre6016]

All Elementary Particles have Mass, Spin & Charge? But just a few seconds you said Gluons don't. I'm confused.

[@judelog1381]

All Elementary Particles can be split into two sections, fermions (the matter particles that make up the universe), and the bosons (particles that act as force carriers). Both fermions and bosons have spin, and they both have charge (whether positive, negative, or neutral). All fermions have mass, but with bosons it is more complicated. According to general relativity the faster a particle moves the more energy it has, which causes the mass. When a particle is stationary, then it has a minimum mass, called the rest mass. All fermions have a non-zero rest mass, when stationary. But bosons will need a bit more explanation: Gluons have no mass when they are stationary (they have a rest mass of 0), but ,gluons can move, they are exchange between quarks, (which is what the strong force is) bind quarks together, allowing protons to form. Hence the reason why the mass of a proton (which is made up of 3 quarks), is less than the mass of 3 individual quarks, due to the movement of gluons. Photons have no mass, but unlike gluons, they don;t see an increase in mass due to movement. Therefore photons always have no mass and is the only particle in the model that doesn't have mass. However it does have a mass property (it can be quantified as 0). However photons have energy, if a photon has a lot of energy, it can become unstable and convert into a quark and anti quark pair (which both have mass). Z bosons, W bosons, and the higgs boson both have mass, no weird things happening there. Note, I am still learning quantum mechanics and I may have made some mistakes, but they are most likely minor. Particle Physics is the most complicated field in all of physics, wish you the best.

[@mannetjie3704]

​@@judelog1381 layman here. i have a question. i have heard that any particle that travels at less than c has mass. is this true? if so, how can gluons be massless?

[@Saifullah_4112]

11:37 Ah yes, The light here is made of light