A Chinese Fighter Jet TRIES to Land on a US Aircraft Carrier, Then THIS Happened...

[@ABaney]

Sorry, this is a hypothetical I don’t care to see, especially when you start off by implying that it really happened.

[@andreamercy1486]

Ii7

[@andidyouknow8208]

Agreed

[@FT-ql7lc]

got a thump down because of this.

[@Donkeyearsa]

It had happened mutable times though not in the last 80 years. During WW2 in the pacific theater there where mutable cases where a Japaneses aircraft had attempted to land on an ally aircraft carrier. When the aircraft was identified as Japaneses it was very highly discouraged to continue its attempt to land by being shot at. An ally pilot may have attempted to land on a Japaneses aircraft carrier by mistake though the reason we have not heard of it is the aircraft was shot down killing the pilot and the Japaneses just reported it as an attempted attack and not as an landing attempt.

[@andrewkovach9330]

I feel the same way

[@rickonline]

As a retired naval aviator, I find your video to be a completely idiotic fabrication and a massive misinformative attempt to pollute the mindset of the citizens. This is primarily because there are CAP (Combat Air Patrol) aircraft on station to guard the carrier groups from any aircraft getting close enough to make such an attempt. So please set all stupidity aside.

[@waynecrawford9702]

My question would be, why did the task force allow an “enemy” aircraft get that close to a US aircraft carrier?

[@LarryjB53]

Agree...gotta ask how close did this guy get and where was the combat air patrol covering the aircraft carrier?

[@TheGuyWho888]

To get more defectors and encourage defection.

[@cliffterrell4876]

Because our joint chiefs of staff are buddies with the chinese military.

[@ChrisSprenger.]

To see what happens, and they have to shoot first before action. And or not follow the protocols. There are many things they do before going straight to shooting it down. What if that china man needed help ? Would they help i dono lol

[@jlandon6028]

Russian aircraft constantly harasses American Warships in the black Sea with their Air Force. but they're never armed.Probably a good idea.

[@walterrumohr7090]

100 miles they are intercepted and escorted out. Unless the intruder wants to be a roasted duck. 😂

[@MothaLuva]

And what if there are let’s say 1000 visitors?

[@danlowe]

The Navy operates within 100 miles of China all the time. You're all nuts

[@thomasvilla6109]

@@danlowe - Carriers? Not.

[@marcuschauvin7039]

No non-american fighter would even get close to an aircraft carrier without getting blow out of the sky

[@jlandon6028]

I agree that this is probably true & the escort ships would probablty take it out before the carrier even needed to fire.

[@ronaldviens7862]

Yup, CIWS will turn it into aluminum and steel hamburger.

[@tangro2274]

Hot-heads should not have any chance of being in a decisionmaking position anywhere!!! 😅

[@matthewtedeschi5646]

Why go 0 to 100 and possibly cause a war relations are already fragile enough what if he needed help or wanted to defect

@@matthewtedeschi5646 then all he / she has to do is answer radio requests for intentions. No answer, bye bye boom.

[@RodneyDempsey-o8w]

No way no foreign aircraft would be allowed to get that close.

[@cliffterrell4876]

Unless it china then it is ok. After all, biden is in their back pockets

[@danielhixson3717]

Absolutely. How in the world could they bring it aboard without basic aircraft data for the arresting gear? They would almost certainly end up rigging the barricade and fouling the flight deck.

[@cesariocorpuz1725]

Too much talk go direct to point

[@Doug-o9y]

The pilot would be committing suicide!

[@jimhusselman4012]

Unless enrout he stated he wanted to defect and then they would allow him to land and take him into custody and take possession of the aircraft!

[@paulbork7647]

Navigational error?? He would not confuse a U.S. carrier for a Chinese one. Not possible.

[@eriksaxon458]

It is possible because china's ships are just scaled-down copies of ours.

[@everettputerbaugh3996]

Could be a remaining fuel vs distance home issue.

[@shootingbricks8554]

Some ppl do suck at navigation.

[@sullyway51]

If the error was not caught and he ended up far out to sea so far that he could not get back on Bingo fuel. If he gives a Mayday and we are not at war then Maritime law is you render help.

[@Mike-tg7dj]

They don't call them flat tops for nothing.

[@paulmetheny2126]

I'm retired Navy. And I know that you can't come aboard another ship unless you're allowed. From land or air, at port or at sea. It would have to be something extremely demanding for the Navy to allow it. Good video...

[@samrotheray5805]

My father-in-law is a retired navy commander. Thank you for your service. If this could happen? It would have had to be an emergency and authorized like you said. And not in the tensions we are in now. God bless America.

[@paulmetheny2126]

@@samrotheray5805 My friend, as you see our world is going down the drain fast. No one wants to believe in the Lord, it is without control. Stay in the word of God and stay close to Him. Share the Word of God with everyone, as you can. NEVER STOP. Thank You...❤️🙏

[@samrotheray5805]

@paulmetheny2126 . Amen. I am a believer. I can also see what's going on. I have 4 kids. All teenagers. One going to trade school shortly. Mechanic. Just like me and my dad. Lol. I don't think we will have a election this year. It just seems that the powers that be want all out war. But either way, I know what I'm fighting for. Thanks for responding. And I wish the best for you and yours.

[@paulmetheny2126]

@@samrotheray5805 10-4...🤠

[@samrotheray5805]

@@paulmetheny2126 . I'm fortunate to have been blessed with my family farm after dad passed. In the middle of nowhere. Raising beef and able to hunt.

[@timothywalker4563]

Chinese aircraft please state your intentions before trying to land or you will be escorted away from our ship, unless you want to go for an unintentional swim.

[@charlesgay-ms6yt]

😂😂loL

[@chauvinemmons]

meow

[@troyseaman1045]

No way, an aircraft carrier has lead ships like a destroyer or battleship, absolutely no way an enemy aircraft gets anywhere near it!

[@everettputerbaugh3996]

All U.S. Battleships are museums.

[@opexwells435]

@@everettputerbaugh3996 F the hater. 🖕

[@TheDirtyChef]

​@@everettputerbaugh3996haha keep on believing that bud.

[@adamperdue3178]

@@TheDirtyChef He's right, they're literally museums. We haven't made any new battleships for about 80 years now, because aircraft carriers made them obsolete. But we kept a few of them around to use as museums, though I believe one of them was recommissioned during the Gulf War for a few years.

[@ronaldrogers3566]

Yeah there's no way any foreign jet could get anywhere close to a US aircraft carrier battle group unless the Chinese pilot had a death wish whereby he would be lucky if all he got was arrested and the jet confiscated..China wouldn't give up so much for nothing.

[@vincentehudson5017]

I’m prior military and I haven’t forgotten Pearl Harbor that plane probably would have got blown out the air approaching my aircraft carrier sorry got to go got to go! As a commander I wouldn’t take no chances with my crew or my ship!

[@stevengaitan3149]

Totally agree. Why did the commanders allow this to happen?

[@twosencefromcleveland6084]

That was Japan, dunce!

[@mrlancaster7997]

Doesn't change the facts what he's saying is correct bottom feeder

[@sullyway51]

Dude, I doubt you are old enough to remember the Vietnam War. Sounds like you have been playing to much of those video wargames. Our carriers were not even at Pearl Harbor at the time of the attack.

[@DeborahShuemaker]

Right on 👍. You are awesome!!

[@roysheaks1261]

If the pilot says “asylum,” make them fly to Taiwan Airport and surrender.

[@danlowe]

"Make them fly to China and surrender" -you right now

[@小莉-d1f]

What do you know? You know nothing. On July 12, 4 foreign warships sunk to the bottom of the sea in China's Beibu Gulf. It was news in China. 4 places. I don't know how many warships were sunk to the bottom of the sea. China's navy is not ordinary. Very powerful

[@小莉-d1f]

What do you know? You know nothing. On July 12, 4 foreign warships sunk to the bottom of the sea in China's Beibu Gulf. It was news in China. 4 places. I don't know how many warships were sunk to the bottom of the sea. China's navy is not ordinary. Very powerful

[@dbrattice]

Impossible. Foreign aircraft approaching an aircraft carrier will be intercepted by the carrier's own aircraft.

[@peoplesambassadordm8279]

Exactly... and if it did land they communicated possibly...atc and the pilots are connected...

[@robertbailey8444]

@@peoplesambassadordm8279you are assuming that the carrier had an armed aircraft flying security. The security for the carrier is a floating a bunch of escorts that would have downed the Chinese aircraft.

[@mikemarkis8885]

​@robertbailey8444 they always have armed aircraft patrolling the sky. The only time there are no aircraft flying above is when it's in port

[@ronaldviens7862]

The CAP

[@waynecrawford9702]

@@dbrattice if not shot out of the air by escorting ships.

[@waynebolin2565]

US Air Force looking really good thanks for your service!!!

[@vmaverick5073]

He probably went through a wormhole, like in the movie "The Final Countdown"😊

[@bugoyboy1746]

🤣 you may be right.

[@RickaramaTrama-lc1ys]

Yes, I loved that movie~!!!!

[@DeanSinclair-b9q]

The final countdown...I'd totally forgotten about that movie...stay strong, don't let these mental midgets try to influence what as a somewhat educated person agrees....they are kids trying and unfortunately succeeding in marketing and money...they figure one week of cut and paste makes them knowledgeable. I'm Canadian and have served. But can guarantee I know more about the US military than he does. Thank you for protecting us...we do what we can. Artic stuff. Leave that to us. Cold Lake, Albert is much colder than Alaska. That's were our 96 or so upgraded F-18 are located. Pathetic. On that note though, the US GOVERNMENT has absolutely funked us. We have already paid multi_billions, which my country can't afford for x amount of F_22 raptors...eight years behind, way above cost overruns and past avionics. At least know that we are here when the stuff hits the fan

[@BLUCHIEF]

That’s the last time I get fooled by one of your thumbnail descriptions

[@navigatorx1013]

LOL............ the MigCap would have vetted his ass long before he got anywhere near the Carrier.😅

[@SuikodenGR]

I mean, if the pilot has nothing to lose (literally), he could try this out, no weapons or misses, get threaten by the US but might not end up shooting cause it's unarmed, land and just sit on its ass. Profit to make himself or herself as a celebrity by china 😅

[@1jackvalley580]

​@@SuikodenGRYou cannot total know If It Would Be Unarmed

[@user-f5xt2op9t]

@@SuikodenGR It wouldn't even have the arresting gear to land on a US carrier. They would not let it even attempt a landing.

[@KirenKK-te7pb]

If the enemy aircraft gets that close then the Carrier has actually been " destroyed" as modern weapons are stand off. There is an umbrella bubble in which no adversarial or unidentified aircraft is permitted to breach.

[@brianv1988]

We have different systems for different ranges it don't matter if he's 100 miles away or 1 mi there are close in weapon systems for closer targets

[@billendres-wc4mt]

That Guy was like " here's my chance! I'm going to be an American !"

[@bobsterclause342]

Easy. Its called a donation. No act of war, just thanks for the craft. Why? You get close and risk a war, then it better be peaceful. No guessing. You come near a ship, its assumed you are being peacefull and surrendering your stuff. If we land instead of ejecting and dishing, well… Okay, well, capture the vehicle maybe give it back

[@eyesofitachi55]

LOL

[@QuicksilverVM]

who would want that ^^

[@teresitamangrobang7989]

They took chance to get and transmitted information to china they are wise clever and suicidal just to spied american ship

[@GrannyPreps]

😂😅😂😅😂

[@silverlining6824]

This video talks about possibilities - all hot air, none real.

[@seumateutongsin6362]

Oh I got it, maybe someone from the aircraft carrier ordered Uber eats, and the Chinese jet doing part time delivery service, LOL, egg foo yong coming right up😂

[@GrannyPreps]

😂😅😂😅❤

[@ronaldviens7862]

They're only gonna be hungry again an hour later.

[@garyludwick9256]

Best part....10 MINUTE!

[@impacking]

😂

[@ritchievernon8099]

Maybe he wanted to learn firsthand the American language up close and personal! 🙏😊🎆🚨

[@energyasylum997]

He probably had to take a dump and was trying to make a pit stop! When you gotta go, you gotta go! Lol

[@Rottensausage618]

I was just thinking that and lol I'm glad I wasn't the only one thinking that 😂😂😂

[@orlinchirinos1981]

🤦🏻‍♂️😂

[@heyinway]

They piss and shit in their flightsuits.

[@RagsHSC-7]

If any aircrafts that approaches a US carrier, especially a super carrier with its wheels down and hooked down. That is its intent. They would normally wave their wings if they cannot bring up comms. The carriers in LSO if the deck is not foul we the people would definitely try to achieve his defection with the aircraft as an asset to future conflicts. Now if he's zipping around the aircraft carrier provoking then China would be on the horn from the US in less than 60 seconds. We would not contact China if we know the intent is to defect. They would send their aircrafts to destroy it in the pilot. Commerheads always prevail and to capture an asset that has not been 100% recon with its abilities. Of course, we would welcome the opportunity. To do otherwise would be to cut our nose off to spite our face. Simply really it happens all the time. It is not published or the reasons that not to notify the communist country and it trying to reclaim it at SEA. ! It's happened many times. That's how we find out what they really have under the hood. God bless 🕊️

[@bobbg9041]

I do not think they use hooks. And they are having problems with the high speed magnetic launch systems they went with on the Russian ramp launch systems.

[@nicholasswaim2835]

Yeah wheels down and if not empty a weapons dump means they're surrendering. Wouldn't be wise to just open up on a foreign plane because it got close in international waters. Our boats get buzzed all the time all over the world.

[@Flightman453]

@@bobbg9041 Sometimes I truly wonder if you people ever hear yourselves. No, they are not "having problems". And how does this comment even make sense. They already have two STOBAR carriers, it's not like they just built one right now so what are you talking about? Cope.

[@jimmyyoung9883]

This is so full of bull 💩💯🤣😂🤣😎

[@小莉-d1f]

What do you know? You know nothing. On July 12, 4 foreign warships sunk to the bottom of the sea in China's Beibu Gulf. It was news in China. 4 places. I don't know how many warships were sunk to the bottom of the sea. China's navy is not ordinary. Very powerful

[@MausMasher54]

It would probably turn out having the Pilot to Eject away from the fleet and pick him up....Let the Chinese recover their aircraft....

[@tachyon8317]

No way. U.S. grabs it does some studying on components. After all, they stole f-35 plans from us, we're just seeing what they did with that info. Think of it as "returning the favor irl".

[@nayon9379]

🔴THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the Salvation of the last day that Christ brought in the second and last incarnation of His new and holy name" (How many religious practices do you follow? How many bases have you rebelled against God's word and chosen your own path? Understand God's word and live it. Be principled in your actions and deeds; it's not following the rules or doing it against the will for pretense. Rather, it is the practice of truth and living the word of God. Only a practice like this will please God. Any practice that pleases God is not a policy but a practice of truth. A person who truly loves God and is in the truth is a person who is honest with God, but he does not reveal it to the outside. He is ready to practice the truth when tested and does not speak or act in a way that goes against his conscience. He shows wisdom when faced with trials and is principled in his actions, regardless of the situation. A person like this is the one who truly serves. There are some who are often only verbal when it comes to their debt to God. And if you ask him, "In what ways are you indebted to God?!" He couldn't answer. All those who only use words to deal with God are hypocrites! Religious rituals and beliefs prevail among people like this; they live in such rituals and beliefs, always believing that such acts are pleasing to God, and that superficial piety or sad tears are pleasing to God. What good will these strange things do? Is this kind of people in the kingdom? The person in the kingdom must be lively and free, innocent and open-minded, honest and pleasant; one who lives in a state of freedom. He has character and dignity, and can be a witness wherever he goes; he is pleasing to both God and man. Those who have faith in God in their hearts are not strange in the outward sight of others, but their actions and deeds are commendable to others. Only these people can be considered living the word of God. What do external good works represent? The outward actions of man cannot fulfill the will of God. You believe that what is pleasing to you and what you desire is pleasing to God. What pleases you is what God surely hates, and your behavior is what God hates and hates. Such people are hypocritical Pharisees and religious people! The greater the elements of hypocrisy, the greater the opposition to God, and in the end, such people are sure to be rejected.) Almighty God said How many RELIGIOUS PRACTICES do you FOLLOW? How many bases have you REBELLED against GOD'S WORD and CHOOSE your OWN path? How many times have you put God's word into practice because you truly consider His burdens and seek to fulfill His will? UNDERSTAND GOD'S WORD and LIVE it. Be PRINCIPLED in your ACTIONS and WORKS; it's not following the rules or doing it against the will for pretense. Rather, it is the PRACTICE of the TRUTH and LIVING the WORD of GOD. Only PERFORMANCE like this will PLEASE GOD. 🙏 Any practice that pleases God is not a policy but a practice of truth. Some people have a penchant for attracting attention for themselves. 🛑 In front of His brothers, he will say that he is indebted to God, but behind their backs, he does not practice the truth and does the opposite. Isn't this like the religious Pharisees? A PERSON WHO REALLY LOVES GOD and is in the TRUTH is a PERSON who is HONEST to GOD, but he doesn't REVEAL it OUTSIDE. 🙏 He is READY to do the TRUTH when there is a TEST and DOESN'T SPEAK or ACT in a way that goes against His CONSCIENCE. He SHOWS WISDOM when there is a TEST and there is a PRINCIPLE in His WORKS, regardless of the situation. A person like this is the TRUE SERVANT. 🛑 There are some who are often only verbal when it comes to their debt to God. They spend their days with furrowed brows, showing off, and pretending to be pitiful. Absolutely disgusting! And if you ask him, "In what ways are you indebted to God? Please tell me!" He couldn't answer. IF you are FAITHFUL to GOD, do not mention it in public, but use your actual practice to show your love to God, and pray to Him with an honest heart. All those who only use words to deal with God are hypocrites! Some speak of indebtedness to God in every prayer, and begin to cry when they pray, even without the touch of the Holy Spirit. ☀️ Religious rituals and beliefs prevail among people like this; they live in such rites and beliefs, always believing that such acts are pleasing to God, and that superficial piety or sad tears are pleasing to God. What good will these strange things do? To show their humility, pretend to show courtesy when speaking in the presence of others. Some deliberately make themselves slaves in the presence of others, like a sheep without any strength. Is this kind of people in the kingdom? 🛑 The PERSON in the KINGDOM must be ALIVE and FREE, INNOCENT and OPEN WILLED, FAITHFUL and agreeable; one LIVING in a STATE of FREEDOM. He has CHARACTER and DIGNITY, and he can be a WITNESS wherever he GOES; he is PLEASED by both GOD and MAN. 🙏💐 Novices in the faith have many outward practices; they must first undergo a period of dealing and destruction. The beliefs of God in their hearts are not strange to the outward sight of others, but their actions and deeds are commendable to others. ONLY these PEOPLE can be CONSIDERED LIVED in the WORD of GOD. 🛑 If you PREACH the GOSPEL daily this YEAR and the next, ENCOURAGE them to SALVATION, but in the END, you STILL LIVE in POLICIES and DOCTRINE, you CANNOT give GOD the GLORY then. Such TYPES of PEOPLE are RELIGIOUS, and also HYPOCRITES. ☀️ What do external good works represent? They represent the flesh, and even the best outward behavior does not represent life, only your own individual behavior. The outward actions of man cannot fulfill the will of God. You always talk about how much you owe God, but you cannot provide for the lives of others or inspire others to love God. You believe that what is pleasing to you and what you desire is pleasing to God. Can your happiness represent God's? Can human character represent God? What pleases you is what God definitely hates, and your habits are what God hates and hates. 😪 If you feel indebted, then pray to God. No need to mention it to others. If you do not pray to God and instead always draw attention to yourself in the presence of others, can it fulfill the will of God? If your actions are always outward, it means that you are the most arrogant of people. What kind of person is he to be seen--he is only a person who does good but is blind to the truth. Such people are hypocritical Pharisees and religious people! If you do not abandon your outward habits and are unable to make changes, then the elements of hypocrisy will dominate you even more. The greater the elements of hypocrisy, the greater the opposition to God, and in the end, such people will surely be rejected! 🙏 From The Word, Vol. I. The Manifestation and Work of God. In Faith, One Must Focus ... Fulfillment of (John 1:1) and (Ezekiel 2:9-10), (Rev. 19:9,13) 📩 All who have "ears to listen" are led to what the Spirit of God is saying in His lowered and built kingdom/Church engraved with His new name, His totality, the ownership of this disposition, "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD "💐 fulfillment from what was said He to Peter 2,000 years ago recorded in (Mat. 16:18-19). His Coming is the fulfillment of all that was prophesied in the great book of Revelation, so the last "Salvation" He brought the whole truth, the way for eternal life. So the "victorious" ones who will receive them are the wise "virgins" because as recorded in the prophecy of His return no one knows it except the one who will receive it! So "come" and come to His kingdom/church standing in the holy place in the air/KZbin! This is also a fulfillment from the book of (Isaiah 2:2/9:6) which He first fulfilled in His first incarnation. 📥

[@davekauffman8727]

The only scenario I can think of, is that the pilot is low on fuel, or his fighter jet is suffering mechanical or electrical issues. Showing the pilot good will and rendering aid, while displaying military strength while the pilot is aboard, could send a message that would be well received by China, and leave a good impression on the Chinese fighter pilot of American respect, the Asian culture honors respect greatly.

[@robinrosenberg9065]

During the Korean War a north Korean pilot landed at a U.S. airbase. We got the Mig 15 and he became a u.S. citizen. True story !

[@csi1392]

HE WAS ALSO PAID A REWARD

[@renripari5514]

REAL TRAINING SIMULATIONS ! THATS WHAT ITS ALL ABOUT . DEPENDING WHAT YOU ARE EQUIPT WITH . FROM AUSTRALIA 🇦🇺 KIND REGARDS 🇦🇺 🇦🇺

[@michaelburns8883]

That plane could have been carrying a nuke.

[@stevenswitzer5154]

I was thinking more like they gave the pilot covid 20

[@яяяяяяяяяяяя]

This has to be the most realistic thing I’ve heard in weeks

[@_unknown_channel_]

Japan is considered an important ally of the United States, even though its constitution denies it the right to engage in war. This is because in the event of a Far East emergency involving the United States, Japan's territorial land, territorial waters, and territorial airspace would become the main battlefield, reducing the risk of an attack on the U.S. mainland.

[@comcastjohn]

They would be intercepted at least one hundred miles out, at least.

[@journeymanX]

US navy: talk to me goose Aircraft: xing xong,ping pong

[@Andrew-xv7mz]

Translation: Touching cloth, declaring emergency.

[@davidm.vanloansr.7788]

No unidentified aircraft shouldn't be that close they should be given a 500 mile warning to let them know to reverse coarse.

[@michaelpiatkowskijr1045]

During the Battle of the Philippine Sea, a Japanese aircraft tried to land on an American carrier. If something like that happened today, it would be nearly impossible. Radar is much better.

[@nicanortiongzhon8785]

The reason the jet is trying to land into US aircraft carrier is get the data how their jets will land correctly to be used in their future building their aircraft carrier.

[@Accurize2]

I swear to God, if you forgot my egg rolls again…right into the drink you go!

[@consco3667]

Keep the plane and dissect it. Look at the MIG25 that landed in Japan in the 70’s.

[@Flightman453]

You guys have to be bots.

[@яяяяяяяяяяяя]

@@Flightman453he’s 1000% right

[@SunnyIlha]

It would be escorted back to its own airspace. If the pilot refused to comply, it would be a threat. If the pilot wanted to defect, he could do it another way. If he wanted to give the arsenal to the U.S. as a defection, he could eject out and allow the US to recover the arsenal.

[@edwardfindley8483]

It's not going to happen. There's a reason aircraft carriers have battle groups and escorts. The aircraft would become an oil slick long before reaching the carrier.

[@JoeFennell-j7e]

Since you mentioned “climate change “, I hope the Chinese take into consideration our military’s diverse multi mix of over 20 genders.

[@azxff1]

All of them took the oath...

[@edb3877]

Interesting that the video did not mention the carrier making evasive maneuvers to prevent the Chinese aircraft from lining up to land on the carrier deck. Also, some red flares could have been launched ahead of the Chinese jet as a non-lethal warning to the pilot.

[@jefferyvetrono6259]

It could happen but doubtful. GOD bless 🙏 Pastor Jeff

[@Wilsonphenmooneter]

Imagine this: If that is a surrender jet landing on the US carrier and then another helicopter come to the carrier Demanding US handover the deserter and the jet what would they do?

[@unknownsierra6297]

US Carrier: "...what jet?"

[@pakjai5532]

"Excuse me, please, I thought you were our Fujian carrier!" 😂

[@davidstruve488]

I think Pearl was Japanese vs US!

[@georgewilson4245]

The fact is Chinese Naval pilots are trained for parade unlike US aviators that trained for combat.

[@jmhjr1419]

He was probably trying to defect

[@kurtwinter4422]

Things you never want to test: Fire alarm in a hospital, puncture resistance of lithium batteries, the resolve of the US military.

[@grimdiannabones4361]

He was like I'm so sick of fried rice all I want is a fork and a cheese burger

[@surimenon7660]

They are REAL FRIENDS behind the curtains, NOWORRIES , Good Will visit 😃😃👍💪🇮🇳💪

[@TruthLovingPatriot]

The USS Yorktown is now a museum in Mt Pleasant, South Carolina. The Charleston area.

[@joanne4758]

I thought this was an Official Navy site - I shall carry on searching.

[@seumateutongsin6362]

Maybe the pilot is trying to defect?

[@garymartin9777]

If that is communicated to the carrier crew they will be instructed to fly parallel to the ship about 10 miles out and eject. A rescue helo will be dispatched to pick him up. It's not worth damage to the flight deck to recover a Chinese airplane, no matter how new.

[@aqasyahnizam28]

its not north korea where you cant go outside

[@яяяяяяяяяяяя]

@@aqasyahnizam28north Korea is stricter XD

[@michaelsadams524]

No one understands better the veracity of this statement than our Armed Forces that "War is hell." You asked us to comment whether we believe diplomacy or fighting is the best, or preferred, action. The truth is, I believe both are correct. Saying that, diplomacy should, in the overwhelming number of times, be the first course of action. Our ally Israel said it best many years ago: "We are for peace. But when we are for peace, they are for war." As much as it is possible, we should vigorously, and thoroughly use diplomacy and other peaceful means to resolve the conflict. But as history has shown us, this has not always been possible. When, and if it becomes impossible, escalation and attacking should be pursued as vigorously as diplomacy was used. As an American, and as a follower of Jesus, I promise to hold up Our United States Armed Forces in prayer, both for continued strength to keep the peace, and for protection and power if fighting becomes inevitable. To every man and woman who is serving, or has served in The United States Armed Forces, I say thank you for your service from the bottom of my heart. You are deeply appreciated.

[@DavidLee-g1r]

That landing would be a major insult

[@яяяяяяяяяяяя]

☠️☠️☠️

[@cv41vf151]

It’s amazing how many of these commentators think that this actually happened.

[@adoatero5129]

Yes, and that was of course the goal of the creator of the video.. Unfortunately it's easy to deceive people on serious matters too.

[@ОльгаАндреевнаГурьянова-ф4щ]

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉вперёд вперёд КИТАЙ 🇨🇳 😊😊😊😊😊❤❤

[@SIDEKICKONYOUTUBE]

Where is the link ? i can't validate this report.

[@RentDunbar]

I am normally not interested in answering a hypothetical question but this one is easy. If it is not in the war situation, the Chinese aircraft should be allowed to land on the American carrier after confirmation/verification that such landing is for the emergency purpose via communications. After the landing, detain the pilot and dismantle the aircraft for more military secret information.

[@Robert-t9s9l]

I find it hard to believe

[@Dannysoutherner]

It happened in WW2. At least one Zero pilot either successfully landed on an American carrier or noticed at the last second and turned away. We got intact Zeros to play with somehow. Learned a lot about how to counter them.

[@mattc.310]

Try better for more accurate titles and descriptions. A Chinese jet's wingman would splash the other aircraft before it had a chance to line up.

[@Sky_Burger88]

What if the Chinese pilot was permitted to land on the US carrier and then the pilot detonated a nuclear bomb? Would the damage be limited to the carrier itself, or would the nuke destroy the entire carrier group?

[@bryantmay4299]

No answer , in the drink it goes

[@floridawestcoast3912]

Let em land and get that mig!!

[@carl16760]

if this actually happened it may have been a call for 'help' and I think we would because we are Americans.

[@really696]

Pilot: Quickest way to get a green card!! Let's land here. 😅

[@larryehrlich57]

With out a tail hook, bad things would certainly happen...swimming, skidding, crashing, etc, etc.

[@TairnKA]

Remembering the story about the F-22 Raptor checking out the weaponry of a opponents aircraft before revealing its presence, I had a thought that it would be great if U.S. aircraft could activate an opponents weapons latching systems, causing their weapons to harmlessly drop off so if they intended to bomb an aircraft carrier, they couldn't. Their two options remaining would be to strafe the ship or crash into it. Just a thought? ;-)

[@johanpire95]

About 1952 my father was stationed in West Germany. Some lost Russians literally came knocking on the barracks' door. The Russians received a meal and a lift to their own barracks. No diplomatic incident, no news headlines, actually it was more about helping fellow human beings. Fact: The commander's dog called Koekenbak (cookie box), the dog had its own way of saluting the Belgian flag every morning, which resulted in KOEKENBAK, a few curses and nothing else...yes there were special dog rights for Koekenbak.

[@mumbai-12345]

US carrier war ship vs China's super market ship 😂😂😂

[@danlowe]

Can't eat money printing

[@acohen3951]

There is always time for guns, when talking and communication fails. However, first communications should always be tried to de-escalate tensions.

[@jeffkerby6057]

Probably needing to land and or possibility of defecting

[@EricSchafer-b1k]

Enemy aircraft are not allowed to get close. Don't carriers maintain cover aircraft? However, enemy pilots have defected before. As I understand it, the Enemy pilot would be asked their intention. If no land is within land range, the US would direct the plane to drop ordnance before allowing a landing with a defection. The US would quickly check the plane before taking it below deck. The plane would be evaluated by US to clearify its capabilities.

[@scoot77777]

There would be no way the Carrier would allow the enemy aircraft to ever get that close! A CHINESE BALLON HOWEVER WOULD BE A DIFFERENT STORY THAT WOULD BE OK “JOE BIDEN WOULD ENDORSE IT 😊

[@shanemathiasprabhu1550]

When American Aircraft Carriers with deadly long range missiles are seen entering territorial waters of China , Russia & the Arabian Gulf , I believe it's diplomatic to allow an Emergency Landing of a Chinese or Russian Jet . In case of war , capturing hostages & military assets is a big boon instead of dispersing or destroying .

[@azxff1]

LOL!

[@grhinson]

What if he is a kamakazi pilot?

[@slimdarcy9503]

That's Japanese not Chinese. In communism countries people are a recourse and yes seen as expandable but suicide of any kind is frowned upon

[@grhinson]

@@slimdarcy9503 They just want to slave you to death...

[@williamjennings4503]

Sounds like we need to get new leadership in the military

[@ZagiBob]

Reminds me of an SNL skit with the question “What if Julius Caesar had a Piper Cub?”. Two things that did not and will never happen.

[@georgejudd9215]

It’s called I am afraid to take appropriate action, so I am not held responsible

[@davidboerner2677]

Do not vote for Biden if you still Love America America

[@SunnyIlha]

Vote for President Biden if you love America.

[@яяяяяяяяяяяя]

@@SunnyIlhavote for trump

[@markwebb8013]

The crew ordered Chinese.

[@maureencora1]

LOL, (smile)

[@johnlacroix1639]

I like and WOW amazing TY so much ,,Keep up the great work

[@Paul-hw8bk]

How an assassin at the roof top yards away from Trump?

[@joblo341]

"Where air defence?" "Hello, CWIS are you awake?"

[@i-yaziel-i4830]

Well Done !!

[@ScottMStolz]

This is the type of scenario that could start a war if not handled perfectly.

[@jamesw7381]

So according to the big Sam, it's the Chinese who is bombing around the world, but the Uncle Sam is building around the world 😅

[@InterstellarSciFiTales]

Another reason could be that the Chinese jet may have mechanical/electronic issues and not being able to limp back home, so it goes to land on a US aircraft carrier for repairs.

[@PAS_2020]

You know this entire video is a “what if”!

[@keepingup2952]

It's sad, but my first thought is that the aircraft is a drone that is loaded with high explosive on a mission to destroy the tarmac so that no aircraft can land ever again. Bye-bye birdie.

[@samuelwardjr1879]

We should help our fellow humans! We're all human in the end of all government hate of our fellow humans!

[@geraldboyle3005]

Yes, too many clips suggest a 'thing', and talks around it, never showing the 'item' mentioned as the draw. A china/USA alliance wo

[@jamesdouglaswhittaker1811]

Fantastic video indeed . That just about describes it …. a fantasy !

[@peterpeh3891]

If Chinese jet attempts to land on US carrier, then allow it to land. Then claim ownership of the craft, and the pilot if he/she wants to defect.

[@johnschneider3082]

I think the only way that this could possibly happen would be if the Chinese aircraft was experiencing severe mechanical problems and was unable to fly far enough to get to safety. In that case maybe it could land, but getting air borne would probably be difficult,because the Chinese aircraft aren’t equipped with catapult gear.

[@miltonalbright1606]

That’s what I like too know never would get that close for sure Milton

[@organizer14]

We think you should be neutral and maintain friendly communications to inquire whether he ran out of fuel?

[@cuchulainnmurphy4526]

I can't see anything like this happening. I doubt if a Chinese fighter jet would even be allowed to get close to an American aircraft carrier.

[@emilyrivera7378]

That can be a very difficult time for US and Chinese