A Christian Response to Evolution

[@MattPowellOFFICIAL]

This video covers the topic of Creation vs. Evolution. If you're on the fence, this information will help you.

[@theharlemglobetrotter4188]

@@dirkjensen969 Creation makes much more sense than charlie darwinism

[@IronSharpensIron127]

​@@dirkjensen969 😂 that was a good one

[@0i7PX72Nga]

​@dirkjensen969 Singularities have infinite energy density, not infinite energy. Also, the universe is finite.

[@IronSharpensIron127]

@@0i7PX72Nga I thought he was just being funny 🤷🏼‍♂️

[@IronSharpensIron127]

@@logic.and.reasoning Dinosaurs may have farted themselves to extinction, according to a new study from British scientists. The researchers calculated that the prehistoric beasts pumped out more than 520 million tons (472 million tonnes) of methane a year -- enough to warm the planet and hasten their own eventual demise. No that's what your mighty scientist say. The same ones that are wanting people to stop eating beef because the cows are doing the same thing. It's a really dumb religion

[@Niusereset]

*By the Gods!* Those monotheists are crazy...

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

14:04 Sorry, read that part again. Does it say the tail was the SIZE of a cedar, or that it MOVES like a cedar? Now go and look at elephants when thy run, and note how they tense the tail and it sticks backward like a stick, in a very peculiar way. Like a cedar, sure. And when you see that, you know they're charging, so you better get out of the way. That part of the book of job goes on to describe BEhemoth just like an elephant. fo rexmaple the fact that an elephant can swim with the water covering his mouth, because he can breathe through his trunc. A dinosaurs liek a sauropod can't do that. He then sleeps in the shadow of under the willow trees, which an elephant can do, but which a giant sauropod could not since they wouldn't fit. So, is it more likely that they're talking about elephants, or a long since extinct animal that we have no reason to think anyone has ever seen since they were separate from humans by 63.5 million years?

[@dl3487]

You make so many wrong statements concerning the scientific consensus about...everything in your video that its hard to know where to start. 1. "Darwinism is the truth"......what do you mean with "the truth"? Darwinism...or the theory of evolution of species by natural selection has shown to be the most exact theory to describe inter and intra species variations. DNA evidence has only strengthen this. 2. "If everything was not created by a intelligent designer that means that everything poofed into existence litterally from nothing". This is false. This would be the case according to intelligent design. For example, humans evolved from a species before us, that species evolved before them etc. The same applies to every organism alive. In contrary, according to intelligent design, everything came into existence because of a intelligent designer...like magic. 3. You are using a picture of the actor Eddie Redmayne, playing Stephen Hawking as a picture of the actual Stephen Hawking. Just putting it out there. 4. "Atheists believe that rocks evolved, that smaller rocks somehow morphed into larger rocks": No, atheists don't believe rocks "evolve". Stone can change form though due to external change in pressure and temperature. This is basic geology. smaller rocks which are exposed to intense heat and /or pressure change into different types of rocks... its called metamorphic rock and its super common. Furthermore, granite for example is igneous rock which is rock formed though the solidification of magma or lava, which can form due to smaller rocks....forming a bigger rock of granite due to intense heat. 5. "Its much easier to just simply say that God created the world and that the world did not create itself" Yes it is easier to say this....Science isn't easy, that's why ignorant people tend to follow this. 6. "The world did not create itself from nothing" No one in the scientific community claims this. You your self say that "they" claim that dust somehow morphed into rocks as large as planet earth. Stay consistent at the very least....regardless of the gross, and i mean gross oversimplification of your description. 7. "There is no question that God created the world the Bible says...." yeah.... in absolutely no rational way is this a actual valid argument. lets not dive into this rabbit hole though. 8. "Granite.....somehow created it self": Who claims this? Granite is formed under the earths crust...NO ONE is claiming that "granite creates it self". 10. "Water destroys organic molecules" : I am sorry...WHAT??? you exist of of almost 80% water. This is only from the first 6 minutes..... Almost every single of your conclusions (in the entire video) is based on YOUR misunderstanding, misinterpretation, oversimplification, ignorance and the resulting jumping to conclusions based in pure willfully ignorance and misrepresentations of basic scientific principles.

[@KenAmmi-Shalom]

How about starting at the beginning: what, on your worldview, is wrong with "wrong statements"?

[@wishbone7147]

Oh no someone attempting presup…….anyway enough on idiotic arguments. Matt is a grifter. This is how he swindles money from his ignorant handful of supporters. Countless times he’s been challenged to debate and has never done so because he knows he’ll get exposed. That’s the only difference between him and Hovind

[@dl3487]

@@KenAmmi-Shalom what? I dont understand your phraising

[@vinx.9099]

@@KenAmmi-Shalom so your point seems to be that dl3487 has no reason in their worldview to point out that everything mat says is wrong. but lying is wrong in your worldview, right? so shouldn't you be thanking them for being a warrior of truth fighting against lies and falsehoods?

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

25:19 Yes, but what it means to be a "cat" will chage over time. It's true that things remain within the same taxonomic group, always. That's why, as yo umentioned, birds are still dinosaursa, dn why humasn are still apes. The was a time when being a "mammal" meant being something that looked similar to a rat, and nothing else. But now, much later on, it can mean anything from being a whale to being a bear, but they're still "mammals". This is simply because we classify things based on their ancestry. Cats will always have cat ancestors, so they will always be cats, no matter how much they change. And even now, afte 1.6 billkon years of evolution, we are still eukaryotes, are we not?

[@matthewgordon3281]

This video is surrealist comedy gold. An utterly uninformed person delivering the most absurd claims without actual proof, and in such a deadpan that I almost think he is a bad animatronic puppet.

[@PhilIsaak]

Comedy gold is believing DNA got here by chance which is nothing more than a mathematical probability. Probability is not a force. It can’t account for anything. To think the the LAWS of physics just happened and the periodic table just happened to be waiting to be discovered. At the end of the day if we evolved at least we can take solace in the fact the LGBTQ community will die out because it adds nothing to our species in Darwin’s model…..nothing.

[@jamesrandirolemodel5443]

If abandoning religious indoctrination of our kids was just for the fact that it could avoid creating another Matt Powell, it would well be worth it. How in the world can you make somebody utter such nonsense like the one seen in this video??? The answer is quite simple actually.

[@dannyeisenga]

Someone should just go through this video and could the number of incorrect statements and logical fallacies. Maybe I'll do it when I'm bored enough.

[@HateshWarkio]

"Water destroys biological organisms" Sir, have you ever heard of fish? Or drinking? And I don't mean just beer

[@Frankboxmeer]

This guy is an expert in misrepresenting atheism, darwinism, “evolutionism”. No, rocks did not evolve…. Why isn’t there a commandment ‘thou shalt not lie”?

[@vinx.9099]

remember he's a pastor, which means "rules for thy not for me"

[@RealT.A.L.K]

Matt doesn't have any idea of what the definition of an atheist is. Being an atheist is not a belief, it's not believing in any god without evidence. Why don't we have a label for people who don't believe in fairies or unicorns? 🤔

[@keesdevries9484]

Say Matt, do you think you're giving "evolutionism" a fair shake? Think really long about that one. You quoted from The World Book. Why don't you show the full text but only a single sentence? I didn't find your version of the book. Let me just quote from the edition I found: "Paleontologists determine how old a fossil is by measuring the radioactive isotopes in the rocks that contain the fossil."

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

3:11 Space is _expanding_ , not "exploding"...! Can space expand? Well, yes, that's what it's literally doing, as Hubble first noticed over a century ago. No, it wasn't "nothing" that expanded, it was _space_ , the universe. Please, for the love of anything, stop embarrassing yourself like this, I can't take it...

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

2:43 Smaller rock "morphing into" larger rocks? Eeeh... yeah, what happens is that many small rocks come together through gravity and friction, forming larger clumps of rocks. Is this channel some kind of satire, making fun of creationists?

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

22:26 Well, they got that horribly wrong. It's not what science says, and this is not a scientific source. Don't blame the sicence when some random person gets it compeltely wrong. You didn't provide a source for where this nonsensical Q&A is taken from. The fact is that birds pre-date the T-rex by roughly 60 million years, so birds cannot have descended from the T-rex. It's a shame that those people got this so incredibly wrong, but it will happen from time to time.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

6:30 Yes, you need a process. Take for example a bridge, and then destroy that bridge. Now, even though all of the pieces that made up the bridge are still there, you're going to have to use a bunch of other things during the process of rebuilding the bridge. Temporary support structures, machinery, and so on. Those things can then be removed again, once the bridge is repaired. In a similar same way, in order to produce a cell through chemical means you need a process that can produce a cell through various intermediate chemical forms, and perhaps using temporary support structure, at least by analogy. You cannot expect the parts of the cell itself to be capable of rebuilding itself, or we'd actually be immortal. The way our cell are, today, are based on them being produced through cell division. This woudl not be the case for the first cells.

[@vinx.9099]

you see the problem you are making is that you are thinking. if you want to be a creationist you shouldn't do that.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

14:47 Nah, it's more like saying that the rules that things play by have remained the same over time and space. That is, primarily that the laws of nature are the same across time and space, since we have no indicatio of anything else, and because we can genralyl see taht this is true. And if things do accumulate over time, then unifromatiranism would suggest hat this has always been the case under the same conditions. The rules don't just change. Just remember that accumulation isn't the only thing that happens. There's also erosion and weathering, which can remove and expose layers, and so on. It's nowhere near as simple as you sort of suggest, here.

[@vinx.9099]

"t's nowhere near as simple as you sort of suggest" mat powel in a nutshell... well that and murderous homophobia and transphobia.

[@CortxVortx]

Oh, look! The son-in-law of lies is attacking science!

[@johnfinch4585]

Kent hovind is an OG😎

[@m0x910]

To demonstrate something is a lie one must present the truth. All you have is baseless accusations and statements.

[@CortxVortx]

@@m0x910 , anyone who knows anything about science knows that creationists are bald-faced liars.

[@mitchellcarter9760]

@@m0x910Oh, so like this Matt character?

[@CortxVortx]

@@m0x910 , plenty of science sites and vids to expose this blatant fraud.

[@MH-ns3bh]

“I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.” - Galileo Galilei (born on this date in 1564) Hawkin used his intellect! And sorry Mat: you do not understand thermodynamics!

[@wishbone7147]

I heard this was a comedy channel and man were they right!! Matt you need to take your act to Vegas it’ll make the audience cry at how ridiculously funny you are. Best line is how you talk about ‘nothing’ as if it exists!!

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

13:30 Whoops, you skipped an importan word, there! "The LAST massive plant-eating dinosaurs" ate grass. Because indeed, grass first evovled toward the end of the Mesozoic, so only the plant-eaters that lived toward the end of the age of the dinosaurs ate grass. Triassic dinosaurs didn't have any grass to eat, for example. But since you think they all lived at the same time, there woudl always have been grass, right? So why is it that plant-eating dinosaurs from deeper rock layers didn't ever eat grass?

[@MH-ns3bh]

"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same god who has endowed us with Sense, Reason and Intellect, has intended us to forget their use." - Galileo Galilei

[@m0x910]

God hopes you use your intellect as He intends: to honestly seek the Truth and worship Him when you find Him. Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth and the life…”

[@vinx.9099]

​@@m0x910 surely the way he intended for us to use the intellect he gave us was to use it in the way we naturally use it. and the way most people naturally use it is to look at the world around us and see patterns. these patterns lead to conclusions like that evolution is happening. are you saying god designed our intellect badly? that sound pretty heretical to me.

[@fisch8730]

That is some funny shit dude. Subbed

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

20:22 But that was way earlier than when the monkeys crossed the ocean. The continents were much, much closer, then. In fact, for the first 40 million years of dinosaurs, Africa and South America were still stuck togehter, so you could just walk from one to the other. Affter those 40 million years, they very slowly started splitting apart. For a very long time, it would be no problem swimming across that divide. The dinosaurs in question here lived about 90 million years ago, rather than 40 million years ago, meaning the continents had not drifted very far apart, yet.

[@m0x910]

You ever ask yourself what kind of global cataclysmic event could have caused the shattering and division of the super continent Pangea in the first place? The wrath of God during a global flood of divine judgement is a such an explanation.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

@@m0x910 Yes, it's called plate tectonics. It's convection streams in the mantle, which the tectonic plates "float" upon, causing a constant pushing or pulling on the continents. You can still measure their current movement. If the this movement had happened over a single year, it would have vaporized the crust of the Earth. You cannot imagine the energy required to move tectonic plates, and how much energy they have when they move at the kinds of speeds you're talking about. The Earth would have been destroyed. The fact that we are still here proves that it didn't happen. In reality, pangaea has been slowly moving apart over 200 million years.

[@vinx.9099]

@@m0x910 the wrath of god doesn't explain why it appears as a slow process with for instance the signs of the slow ebbing and flowing of earths gravitational field and the multiple previous super continents like Rodinia.

[@reneholterman3596]

And God also created ignorance and stupidity.......

[@ryanfolan3]

"Water destroys biology and organic molicules", the fish, aquatic mammals and aquatic micro organisms might have soething to say about that 🤣 there's no way this guy is actually serious, i refuse to belive people can be this stupid 🤣

[@Deimir]

I'll never subscribe but this is my favorite new parody comedy channel. Check out Poe's Law for extra fun

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

I came expecting bad science, but did not expect to sit here with my jaw on the floor after only 3 minutes. I mean, this must be satire, right? This channel is making fun of the dumbest of the creationists?

[@vinx.9099]

@@antiHUMANDesigns nope. he's genuinely the dumbest of creationists. he's also genuinely one of the worst people. like he literally wishes death on anyone lgbtq+

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

1:50 You, sir, are absolutely hilarious! Clearly, you have not studied thermodynamics if you think it ever claims matter cannot be created and destroyed, since we do that all the time in paticle colliders, for example. Mass and energy, sure, those can't be created or destroyed -- but matter? Go back to studying. There's a huge difference between "mass" and "matter"...!

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

18:08 And a volcanic eroptuin isn't "catastrophic"? Yes, it was catastrophic, but isn't wasn't world-wide just because it was catastrophic to those plants! A world-wide catastrophy capable of doing the things that you're talking about would have turned Noiahs ark into dust, and would have turned the Earth into aoomlten piece of magma, and boiled all the oceans away. You have no perspective on the amount of energy we're talking about, clearly. And you think a wooden box full of humans and animals could even in your wildest imagination have the smallest sliver of hope of not being turned to saw dust? What world is it you live in, exactly?

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

4:40 "Pretty much", yes, as in "in almost every case". Teh thing is that we don't know for sure where life formed. As you point out, probably in water, but we dont' know for sure. We do know how life then diversified through evolution, since that's extremely clear. But how life first formed is not a settled science -- and it is not a part of the theory of eovolution, obviously, just like your talk about rocks and things exploding has nothing to do with theory of evolution or the theory of universal common ancestry. You said this was going to be about evolution, and you've failed to actually talk about evolution, this far.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

9:48 FFS, read what it says. "..and a mix of complex organic compounds [...]". Does this article say that the water in those asteroids eroded rock to produce life, or does it say that the rock contains both water and complex organic compounds? First of all, the organic compounds are not rock. The rock contained it. There are organic compounds stuck in the rock, it's not the rock that is organic compounds, since a mineral is not an organic compound. It's not the minerals in the rock that matters, because early life might not even have used minerals. Rather, it's the organic compounds that are interesting. Do you not find it intersting that asteroids contain things like amino acids? The stuff that proteins are made of? It means those things did not have to be created by a process on the Earth, since they apaprently exist naturally even in asteroids.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

16:58 No, you don't! Prove that you do! This statement could actually be proven by checking if there actually are marine fossils on every mountain. But the fact htat you will not find it on volcanic mountains would prove you wrong, so you will just state it as a matter of fact, even though it is false, meaning you're lying.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

8:48 Strange, since you have not yet even touched on the subejct of evolution, so far. All you've done, so far, is to completely fail to understand various _other_ subjects of science to an embarrassing degree.

[@barrymiller3385]

I don't think anyone claims the Earth is 13.7 billion years old. More like 4.5 billion. Perhaps you are thinking of the Big Bang? (Let there be light?)

[@tristan202xda]

There are tons of scientific and archeological evidence of evolution. I dare any one of you provide any evidence of creationism. And if you say it's in the bible I will ignore you. The bible proves nothing more than a Spider-Man magazine proves Spider-Man exists.

[@johnfinch4585]

"Provide any evidence for creationism" Irreducible Complexity. 👍

[@nathaniel_pardue]

You're thinking of adaptation. There is no proof that one species changes completely into another.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

15:57 Mount Everest is still RISING by about 4 millimeters per year...! You've got this compeltely wrong. Moutnains rise, as well, and lots of moutnains are the result of volcanoes, and there are still plenty of volcanos making mountains...

[@tos100returns]

There could not have been a global flood because raindrops are so tiny!! If god created us from dirt, then why is there still dirt? Using your own "logic" against you is painful. You must be numb.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

10:52 No, and it didn't. All that's left is some heme protein encased in iron.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

26:57 And don't tell the audience that the article says that this couple lived 100'000 to 200'000 years ago. Leave that part out. Instead, let people imagine that this means science says we come from a couple that lived 6'000 years ago, because you want to both eat the cake and have it. And lastly, don't mention that this does not mean the couple in question didn't have parents who were human, and lived in a socity full of other humans, because that'll also ruin the illusion. Let them imagine that a couple who lived 100'000 to 200'000 yeas ago were the first humans ever, even though our species is about 300'000 years old, and humanity as a whole is 2.5 to 2.8 million years old.

[@vinx.9099]

also y chromosomal adam should be the biblical noah, not the biblical adam. but at this stage that's just nitpicking. if you're already 100000 years of being an extra 2000 years of means literally nothing.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

7:43 No, not according to evolution, since evolution is a phenomenon of population genetics. And no, life is not made of rock, since rock is a mix of minerals, and life is not fundamentally made of minerals...!

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

@MihneaCirstoiu What is what? What is life made of? Organic molecules. Not minerals. Yes, it is very easily refuted, which is why I did that.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

@MihneaCirstoiu Organic molecules. Sugars, photsphates, lipids, amino acid, and so on.

[@michaelshort2388]

nobody says that smaller rocks morphed into bigger rocks, through smaller rocks crashing into larger rocks those smaller rocks combine with the larger rocks to create even bigger rocks. You believe god picked up some dust off of the ground (where did that dust come from by the way?) and made it into a man. and that he took a rib from man to create woman.

[@iwkaoy8758]

A monk key wood never under stand how hue men's ken take metal out the ground and create a row bot bee cause they are limited buy their intelligence. God is Moore intelligent den hue men's,So hue men's Kent create what it Ken. Hue men's are limited two their intelligence, but ate theist bee leave science hold isle truth. Science is limited two hue men's intelligence two.

[@iwkaoy8758]

Isle so, the rocks where inn a small dot,but grew inn two plan knits. Most plan knits are huge rocks. Every thing inn the dot grew.

[@98Mikemaster]

The arrogance of this man acting like he knows science better than scientists, while not being able to grasp even the simplest of scientific concepts... Either this is a joke or the world is doomed

[@johnreighard9731]

I love this man of God! God bless you for revealing the Truth. This kind of Wisdom blessed me and resounds with what I've learned throughout my Christian walk with Jesus. Now you've strengthened my belief with great reasoning through scriptures, also. This is definitely a save. 💯

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

16:36 I looked this up. The mountains in Santa Cruz, California, are primarily tectonic (uplift and folding) in nature. Once again, try finding marine fossils on top of a mountain of volcanic origin, since that should be equally common if they were all covered by a great flood, but you should only find marine fossils on tectonic mountains if the explanation is due to tectonic uplift, perhaps with the extreme rare excpetion where a find carried a fish up a moutnian before eating it, or something weird like that. IT shoudl statistically be a very clear difference. So, check it! Stop making these nonsensical claims without checking it! If both your story and tectonics would explain this fact, then it isn't evidence of either. But a world-wide flood would imply that you would equally find these fossils of volcanic mountains, which sets this aapart from the tectonic explanation. So, test it! Or do you not dare to face what you will find?

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

15:43 You get something like mount everest when the indian subcontinent has been pushing really hard against Asia, pushing that whoel chain of mountains up really high. Indeed, this chain of moutains used to be under the Tethys sea before India smashed into that place and pushed it up. That's why you have clam fossils, there. So, how about you go looking for clam fossils on a mountain that was formed through volcanism instead of tectonics? You should see just as many clam fossils on those, right? Do you? Oops, no you don't. You only find fossils on mountain chains produced by tectonic uplift, where they used to be under the ocean, where there are clams... Noah's flood is a story that was adapted from the Epic of Gilgamesh, which was in itself a mythological story that is in part based on the flooding of the city of Surrupak. So, you've got an adaptation of a myth based on a really large but still local flood, from a religion that predates Judaism. In the Epic of Gilgamesh, he meets a man named Utnapishtim, who was given eternal life by the gods after saving peopel and animals on an ark, from a flood sent by the gods. The story contians mane of the same details, such as how they sent out 3 birds to find land, and so on. Adn this story predates Genesis by around 2'000 years, give or take, and is written in the oldest written document we have ever discovered.

[@darrenduerden]

Came here after seeing this BS on Sciman dans channel. Go back to school, your lack of scientific knowledge is absolutely embarrassing

[@charbar311226]

24:02 Genetic Eve That’s an actual Scientific term.

[@vinx.9099]

no it's not, it's mitochondrial eve. because the unique line that comes from this shared female ancestor of all people is not her genetics but her mitochondrial genetics. why would you lie like this?

[@DanTheCox]

When someone starts any discourse with false dichotomies and other logical fallacies, he can't reason on any subject: the proof is with this video.

[@The_Beer_Hunter]

You understand nothing. Instead you choose to believe a book that was written so long ago and for all you know was a clear work of fiction to create a religious cult. Well done

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

10:46 And, Matt, what does "biodegrade", mean, you think? Let me help you: "Biodegrade" refers to the ability of organic substances to be broken down by biological organisms, typically bacteria or other microorganisms, into simpler compounds over time. Now you tell me what microorganisms would manage to enter an iron crystal contianing heme? In order fot the heme they they found to biodegrad, you need a bacteria that possesss enzymes called heme oxygenases that catalyze the cleavage of heme into biliverdin, carbon monoxide, and free iron, and you need it to get into that iron crystal, underground, and somehow manage to digest the heme from inside the iron casing. It's not strange to think that there are cases where no such bacteria managed to do this.

[@m0x910]

The whole dinosaur was so squeaky clean and free of all bacteria when it was buried?

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

@@m0x910 No, but the heme we find was inside of a bone. The specific bacteria needed to break down heme would need to survive being burried underground until they somehow got into the bone. If the bone was not broken, they could have died out before they had access to the heme. I don't remember in what way this specimen is through to have died, ifw e even know that. Some ways they might have died would have killed the bacteria, as well, such as being caught in a pyloclastic flow from a volcano, or perhaps sinking in a tar pit, I'm not sure. I can't say for sure what the bacteria would survive or not. But if this is a rare find, then some rare event/circumstances happened to allow it to be preserved in this specific case.

[@m0x910]

@@antiHUMANDesigns Bones have a rich blood supply. The circulatory system is a circuit. One bacteria gets in there and it can proliferate quickly into bone through the vessels.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

@@m0x910 You make a fair point, assuming those openings weren't clogged for some reason. But as I mentioned, there are various scenarios where bacteria would not survive, and you need the right kind of bacteria, capable of breaking down heme, specifically, and which ar aerobic or anaerobic depending on where and how the bone was deposited. In rare circusmtances, the factors may not have been right for the correct bacteria to be present, which is why we find rare cases where the heme hasn't biodegraded. For example, a place rich in oxygen is not going to have anaerobic bacteria living there, but aerobic ones. And if this is the deposited into an oxygen-starved place, the aerobic bacteria cannto thrive, so now you suddenly need anaerobic ones. And, as I emntioned volcanic eruptions, pyroclastic flows, can sterilize, as one example. I'm obviously not saying I know how this individual died.

[@vinx.9099]

​@@m0x910 either bones would always get infected with bacteria, at which point we shouldn't expect to ever find any haemoglobin in any fossil, whether it happened 100 years ago or 66 million years ago. or sometimes, in extremely rare circumstances, no bacteria made it in, at which stage we would extremely rarely find the extremely stable molecules like haemoglobin in fossils, whether it happened 100 years ago or 66 million years ago. the rarer it is the more and the more varied sources of death and fossilization we'd need for such a rare case to happen. if there only was one event that coursed all fossils it's more likely we should either find haemoglobin in all fossils or none.

[@stanbartlet1452]

Awesome work Matt!

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

26:47 Seriously, Matt, genetics is not themordynamics! The laws of thermodynamics does not apply to population mechanics...! It applies -- believe it or not -- to thermodynamics! And thermodynamics doesn't say that everyhting is tending toward chaos. Even if you equate "chaos" to "maximum entropy", this is only true for an isolated thermodynamic system, not to other things, specially when they aren't even in in the same cateogry of things! If what you were saying was true, live couldn't exist at all. The whole thing about life is that it avoids increasing its entropy by being a very open thermodynamic system, which means that the 2nd law of thermodynamics does not apply to life. That aside, even if it did apply to life, it doens't apply to population mechanics. You show me how population mechanics is an isolated thermodynamic system, and I'll admit you have a point. Good luck. Until then, how about you stop lying?

[@vinx.9099]

thermodynamics would even predict life, as living things increase entropy way faster then if life isn't there.

[@rashido_grey]

FFS almost everything you said was either a lie or a proof text that is essentially a lie.

[@heinrichventer]

Why can evolution not be the creation process of God? Nowhere in the Bible are these details being disclosed and looking at evolution and the creation of the universe, it is quite a Godly process. I think Matt understands too small to even grasp the basics of the real might of God and the scientist are but merely interpreting the tiny bits they figure out. All of these are VERY high mighty rolls right over Matt's head. At least the scientist gives us some insight in how mighty it really is and that give me a big smile of WOW!

[@CraigGriffiths]

The problem is, if evolution is true, not only does it go forward, when we see new variations. But it would go backwards, to a single cell somewhere. So Matt has to fight against that. Remember, this is the guy that openly says gay people should be murdered. I don’t think his opinions stand for much.

[@gusmonster59]

Research? You didn't use a photo of Stephen Hawking. That is an ACTOR. If you know so little about science to not know Stephen Hawking when you see him, you need to stop talking as if you know what science is, or that you understand it - you obliviously do not. Water does not destroy DNA. We are 80% water. Animals live in water. Not every person in world is Christian, there are other, older religions. So all this is your opinion and your opinion only. The biggest shame here is that other people blindly agree with you.

[@DustinKillyact]

If something cant come from nothing? Then where did your god come from? Other than pure imagination... Your god didn't just poof himself into existence.... If god could always has been here its obvious that we also could have always been here in the same manner...magic is not the answer you are not a immortal god yourself

[@0i7PX72Nga]

@DustinKillyact It is just as reasonable to believe that God created time and space, as the universe poofed itself fom nothing.

[@DustinKillyact]

@@0i7PX72Nga so your saying that we simple germs to worms to short life human beings makes less sense than a god that just poofed himself into existence with the power to be able to make other gods and creatures planets then just kill everyone on the planet because he cant control a evil angel that he created so he can judge us on what he already knows will happen before he sends 3/4 of his own creation to burn in hell for eternity for his own entertainment but cant even prove his own existence over 10,000 other gods that only wants people from the usa in heaven??? I'm 100% sure that's all crap and you will not become a immortal god the day you die like your brainwashed to believe

[@valentinvas6454]

​@@0i7PX72NgaScience doesn't claim the universe poofed itself to existence from nothing. It says the universe was condensed into a single, immensely dense point. We don't know how that point came to be. There are theories that new universes born on the "other side" of supermassive black holes.

[@believestthouthis7]

God exists outside of time. He has always been here and He will always exist. Jesus called Himself "I am", so we're talking about a Creator that has always been. He is God, the Creator of everything and everyone. Revelation 1:8 KJV - I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty. Genesis 1:1-3 KJV [1]In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. [2]And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. [3]And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. John 8:57-58 KJV [57]Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? [58]Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

[@johnfinch4585]

What condensed all that matter into the small point? How did it get there? Where was this dot? When was this dot there? Why did the dot explode? God is a logical conclusion.😊

[@TickedOffPriest]

Spouting nothing but truth.

[@JoseRodriguez-cq6vd]

I love Jesus ❤

[@bjarne3521]

Nothing wrong with that. However, I highly recommend actually looking up the stuff Matt is talking about from a non-creationist source. It becomes blatantly obvious, pretty soon, that Matt is a liar about pretty much anything he claims to be a "scientific point of view", and how he's straw-manning what people he doesn't agree with actually believe.

[@rationalthinker8401]

HAHAHA "the world created itself" you are not smart matt

[@GabrielSimon]

👌

[@XavierCuevas-dc9qf]

The straw man go crazy, keep praying to sky daddy

[@0i7PX72Nga]

@XavierCuevas-dc9qf Actually He is not in the sky, but already inside you and me, if you accept Him. 1 Corinthians 3:16 Do you not know that you are a temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwells in you?

[@XavierCuevas-dc9qf]

@@0i7PX72Ngano I didnt know that and nobody knows that.

[@johnfinch4585]

​@@XavierCuevas-dc9qf Keep clinging to science for comfort.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

3:58 Granite is cooled magma. It's not created by accident or "by itself" alone, it's magma that is erupted or otherwise exposed, then cooled down to form "granite". And the reason we can't do it artificially is that it takes millions of years for this process to produce that exact structure. Give _us_ millions of years to do it, and we _can_ do it! But remember two things whenever you talk about how we humans can't do something: that exists in nature: 1. Nature can do things we can't do, and we can do things nature can't do. 2. We can very often do things now that we couldn't do before, and we can expect to be able to do things in the future tha twe can't do, now -- not that this is relevant to what _nature_ can do!

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

15:57 One quick event, and it carved a nice river, rather than completely wrecking the entire part of the continent, as it would have? Anything with the power to carve something that deep in short time will not form a river, it will scrape the area flat...!

[@m0x910]

After the layers of sediment were laid during the global flood, they were all still wet. When the global flood ended and waters receded off the continents the rapidly draining water off the continents dug out canyons through the soft layers.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

@@m0x910 Like I said, if it could dig a cayon that deep, it wouldn't have formed a twirling river that at some points changes direction by around 180 degrees, it would have scraped the entire area flat.

[@vinx.9099]

@@m0x910 lay down a layer of clay, then dump a bucket of water over it. that is what you should see if mat is right. the grand canyon however is a meandering river. a river meanders when it lost most of it's energy. that the grand canyon meanders is proof that it wasn't made in one big event.

[@gwanael34]

@@m0x910 There was no global flood. The flood myth is just that, a myth made by people 8000 years ago that lived in the flood prone areas of mesopotamia. It probably just started as a story about a random farmer making a boat for his family and livestock before a monsoon season and evolved into the myth we have today, just like a lot of mythology

[@m0x910]

@@gwanael34 The fossil record is empirical evidence for the global flood. Unless you have another logical explanation for how the geological strata extend across exist across every continent on earth?

[@Loading....99.99]

This is great stuff.. God bless you brother Matt!

[@MatthewJ.Francis]

The heavens declare the glory of God!

[@MatthewJ.Francis]

@@switchie1987 indeed. But they make a statement. It’s obvious God exists-you suppress the truth, sir.

[@johannmeiring4208]

Not sure about the dinasours.

[@jesusthenameaboveeveryname7572]

After seeing some videos attacking creationism, this is a very refreshing video. A sure reminder that God has given us clear evidence of his existence.

[@georgesmith7733]

What a load of utter drivel

[@justinhand4518]

If your god created earth, who created him? Himself? Another god? But the christian answer is he was always there. A child thinks like that.

[@believestthouthis7]

In your view nothing created something for no reason? Revelation 1:8 KJV - I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.

[@dl3487]

So he came from nothing....?

[@justinhand4518]

@@believestthouthis7 Quoting some bible babble doesn't make it real. It is just babble.

[@believestthouthis7]

@@justinhand4518 That's what atheists often say. If it weren't real it wouldn't bother them so much.

[@justinhand4518]

@@believestthouthis7 All just more bible babble.

[@Jack-bu4mj]

Mutations are almost always destructive 🥼

[@vinx.9099]

false. they are almost always neutral. a small percentage is negative, an even smaller percentage is positive. natural selection selects for positive mutations and against negative mutations, so even though negative mutations outnumber the positive ones more positive mutations spread through the population.

[@jimcricket1]

They are so open minded that their brains fall out. Gravity isn't "nothing", nothing is literally nothing.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

30:05 Well, we've got images of comets out there. New Horizons, for example, pased by a few. So, there are comets out there. Call it the Oort Cloud or don't, it doesn't matter. Do you doubt that there are lumps of muddy ice outside the orbit of Pluto? Is that unrealistic to you? You're really grasping at straws, here.

[@sarahreeves8296]

This is a lot of great material!

[@vinx.9099]

it's pulled out of his ass, which is why he has no sources for anything he claims.

[@vladu__e]

for a stand-up show where you're laughed off the stage, yeah

[@bradw3153]

One thing I'll never understand about an evolution believing atheist. They believe we are an evolutionary animal just like all the other animals. So out of all the hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of animals, we (1) out of all, are so set apart. Wearing clothes going to school getting taco bell careing for people we've never met building complex vehicles buildings. 🤔🤷 Yet EVERY other animal eat sleep poop reproduce repeat that's it. AND then we the only ones that happen to have a inspired Book that tells use we are set apart and created by a Creator.

[@bradw3153]

*Caring

[@believestthouthis7]

Evolution teaches them that they are just another dumb animal. Hebrews 2:6-7 KJV 6 But one in a certain place testified, saying, What is man, that thou art mindful of him? or the son of man that thou visitest him? 7 Thou madest him a little lower than the angels; thou crownedst him with glory and honour, and didst set him over the works of thy hands:

[@valentinvas6454]

If you go back 10000 years we were much closer to animals don't you think? Civilizations only started around 6000 years ago. BTW I can also show you an orangutan driving a golf car as well.

[@ianfisher9179]

Creation is stronger than evolution, amen!

[@toma3447]

God creates through evolution. God himself evolves.

[@DJPatesBlog]

​​@@toma3447 If God made evolution possible, he would be impossible to worship because those things would be chaotic and the things in existence cannot be trusted to stay alive, that someday our cells will come apart, this world would destroy itself and it would seem God doesn't care. In fact I think that's why atheists believe in evolution. Because they believe that God doesn't care, therefore there is no God to them. And because there's chaos in this world, atheists accept chaos through evolution. But that's not the God we worship. God cares, and much more than we care to think.

[@oldscorp]

@@toma3447 I'm pretty sure you believe He evolved from the Old Testament days and is now ok with certain things you enjoy doing today that were accused by the Bible. "Things are different today" right? "I evolved from apes over millions of years, it's normal to have urges." Right? That is the whole point and motivation for heresy. They are lies we tell ourselves to put our tormented conscience to sleep. God loves you no matter what you do buddy, but until you grow up and come back to the fold, you will keep drifting further away and keep hurting yourself and others, and the harder it will be to come back. TRUST me, I know from experience.

[@ianfisher9179]

@@toma3447 He's unchanging. Not "evolving"

[@tonymaurice4157]

Abiogenesis fails ​@@oldscorp

[@nickroberts-xf7oq]

Amen ! 🎉 📖 👍 💯 % ✅️ 🎯

[@alphabeta1337]

Creation is far better supported by facts

[@HaosCosmic]

If you want to accept creationism, act like god is good and all are perfect.

[@vinx.9099]

if you want to accept creationism stop thinking, because thinking anything through will lead to the end of being a creationist. you can still be christian. after all there are most evolution accepting christians then there are atheists total.

[@HaosCosmic]

@@vinx.9099 Not thinking, then cars will run over me. Or kids will make broke... Damn, good logic you have. No thank you. I rather be last on the rank of hell, then be a chat gpt of brainwash.

[@Jack-bu4mj]

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

[@michaelgallick4617]

Matt. I think that most people in the world knows about the bible, and that God created the world and everything, in the KJB. They just rather accept evolution so therefore they can sin and do whatever they want! We pray for them! God bless you Pastor Powell, with 🙏's and love.

[@kaymantie2314]

You're right about abiogenesis. Life is more likely to start in a blazing fiery environment instead of in a pond. You're also right about Dinosaurs. The organic material would have broken down to nothingness even if it was in an environment that could offer some short term preservation.

[@1mizanthrope1]

Somebody help me reconcile neanderthals. This has been bothering me for a long time.

[@alphabeta1337]

Neandertals are regular people who went to Europe after the tower of Babel and got bone diseases due to the lack of sunlight in the postflood ice age

[@nickroberts-xf7oq]

They were post-flood or post tower of Babel outcasts of society, wandering around, living in caves,making new stone hunting tools wherever they went, with their diets giving them the characteristic jaws, brows, etc.

[@IronSharpensIron127]

They lived to be extremely old, and were probably some of the nepheline that the Bible speaks of

[@1GODISNOWHERE1]

Neanderthals are simply human beings. Biologists gave fossilized and unfossilized bones whose skull had a pronounced brow ridge, and whose skeleton had greater bone density and size than we have today and applied a different evolutionary classification to them.

[@jeremyramsey8804]

They lived long lives, hence the reason their eyebrow ridges protrude from their foreheads. Human beings' heads never stop growing. If you're in you 40's your head will be bigger than when you were in your teens. Neanderthals lived for a lot longer than we do.

[@ryandaniel4571]

Outstanding job, my brother! Keep up the good work! I miss you and hope to see you and your lovely family again soon!

[@edsharpe2800]

Good video

[@addersrinseandclean]

Keep up the good work Matt

[@theharlemglobetrotter4188]

Creation makes so much more sense than charlie darwinism

[@ianfisher9179]

Just finished this. It was AMAZING!!

[@charbar311226]

Hello Matt March 6th was the second anniversary of my Cancer surgery (completely removal of my Stomach, Gallbladder and 1/4 of Liver). More Chemotherapy. I’m doing much, much better. I am NOT an ancestor of soup! Christ is King

[@vinx.9099]

no one says your ancestor was soup, only liars claim others claim you came from soup. god should have controlled that you got cancer. the progress made by scientists allowed extremely trained doctors and surgeons to get rid of it.

[@stanbartlet1452]

People really think behemoth was a hippo? LOL wow

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

It's literally describing an elephant, the same way that "leviathan" very clearly describes a crocodile.

[@vinx.9099]

if you're wrong, always misrepresent the people correcting you, that way you can pretend you debunked their correction without having to actually do anything. you just have to be ok with being dishonest.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

11:55 They aren't. See, what happens is that you've got some creationists who will take a piece of a fossil, and do who-knows-what to it, and then send it to a lab for radiometric dating. The lab then retuns the result, with the accompanying comment that the amount of C-14 found in the sample is low enough to be "noise" in the machine (all machines have a noise floor), and that in other sample (from the same fossil), they found extremely high amounts of C-14, indicating contamination of the sample. And what do the creaionists do with this? Go out and lie how they found C-14 in Mesozoic fossils, of course. Why not, it's not like they're honest, anyway? These are professional liars, it's in their job description to do this. Forget the fact that no one else can reproduce this result, of course. Don't mention that part.

[@user-dw6so4vf7u]

Trusting God and his word takes less faith than so called science.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

Yes, keep saying that while reaping the rewards of science.

[@dascally6075]

It takes a lot of faith to believe in God as there is NO EVIDENCE of his existence. Science is not faith! It can be demonstrated again and again.

[@ryanfolan3]

Well next time you or someone you know get sick how about you just pray and nothing else instead of medication or going to the doctor (both of which by the way, only work because of science) and see how well goes for you.

[@TienTran-pl2pj]

great video but i think google erased "how does dna get destroyed" in search engine be cause it is not there

[@tatyanapetrov4215]

May God bless you and keep you safe!

[@MatthewJ.Francis]

Love these videos! Keep up the good work fighting the insanity! 💪💪💪

[@tubeincompetence]

Please, more videos. Soon no one will believe in creationism. 😁

[@0EEVV0]

such a good presentation

[@bjarne3521]

If you made a drinking game out of this and took a shot every time Matt said something inaccurate, you'd die of alcohol poisoning within the first 5 minutes.

[@2027Judah]

Evolution is impossible

[@bjarne3521]

I recommend actually reading up on it, because it's not that hard to understand that evolution is indeed a fact of our reality, on which many things in our society (like basically anything related to medicine or agriculture) depend on.

[@2027Judah]

@@bjarne3521 😂😂

[@OpenSafe17.11]

Creation = logic. Evolution = delusion

[@EnoYaka]

You're delusional

[@KenAmmi-Shalom]

Also, biology is a science but evolution is a worldview philosophy.

[@EnoYaka]

@@KenAmmi-Shalom you're a joke

[@bjarne3521]

I recommend actually reading up on it, because it's not that hard to understand that evolution is indeed a fact of our reality, on which many things in our society (like basically anything related to medicine or agriculture) depend on.

[@Eternal-Security]

Thank you for always ending the videos with Truth about Jesus, the Lord of All Creation. Thank you for your hard work. May God bless you and your family Matt.

[@vinx.9099]

you're praising someone who'll happily preach for the death of your kids for reasons they'll be to scared to share with you.

[@antiHUMANDesigns]

8:08 Matt, that was 3 billion years later. Rocks -- minerals -- were later incorporated into more complex eukaryotes. Yes, we use minerals in our bodies, as I'm sure you know. Our skeletons are made of minerals, fo rexample. Had granite not existed, then yes, this could have stifled the evolution of more complex eukaryotes. Do you understand what that sentence means? No, no, no, rock is not your "ancestor". Rock doesn't have a genome, you didn't inherit genes from a rock...! You are not descended from a rock. This owudl eb exactly liek saying a sandwich is your acestor because you ate it. Really, it's the same principal thing. It's ridiculous. Those early eukaryotes started "eating" minerals, allowing more complex structures to evolve. Eating something doens't make it your ancestor, or does this really have to be explained to you?