A CyberSecurity Conversation with Admiral Mike Rogers

[@noname-fn6cp]

The changes. 🧐💜📝🎧📹

[@markjmaxwell9819]

One of the hardest jobs in the world. No wonder he looks so weary a lot of pressure. Keep up the good work mate😉

[@mistymayhem2403]

Yeah, spying on Americans and trying not to get caught would make one weary.

[@beatrizmurillo9626]

Mi almirante Michael Rogers, ❤️ y especial para mí tqm,🙏💕🇻🇪

[@Neavris]

29:15 to see Bruce Schneier

[@williamtrask4298]

Hi, Mike.

[@chrisjones7594]

You should defend the Constitution of this nation.

[@noname-fn6cp]

💜🎧📹

[@noname-fn6cp]

💜📝📝📝🎧📹

[@noname-fn6cp]

💜📝🎧📹

[@ultimaz100]

Mike Rogers for president of USA

[@stanisawalaskowska6798]

What you do for your own needs no one will know. You will not create such a system that there is no loophole for a hacker to enter the system.

[@chrisjones7594]

I am a patriot. I fight got my neighbors, love, God, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness!!! I live in America and am a son of the republic.

[@sonafabix]

Surveillance state in the hands of psychos. dont be fooled youre dispensable.

[@noname-fn6cp]

🥰😚🤗💜📝🎧🎧🎧📹📹📹

[@kfw9257]

"Engage in a discourse." This wasn't much of a discourse considering he denied what is so obvious to the people who know about encryption. If you build a backdoor, using a legal framework has he put it or not, you introduce a vulnerability into the system. And that vulnerability could be exploited by hackers, other governments, etc. Or am I missing something? And how can you have a real conversation if all the details are classified so we have to speak so vaguely that it's completely ineffective. Seems like a waste of time to me. They just want to give the appearance that they're open to discussing these issues with citizens when in point of fact, they really are going to do whatever they feel is right regardless of how we feel about it.

[@noname-fn6cp]

😍🧑‍🦳👩‍🦳👨‍🦳

[@noname-fn6cp]

Dont move. 😡😳💙💜📹🪞🔭