Beautiful Spit....Beautiful scale take off....Beautiful scale flight...Beautiful scale landing....boom
@cheungsabrina4704 жыл бұрын
Beautiful RC Spitfire! Good control in departing & landing!
@chilarai17 ай бұрын
Amazing model excellently flown. 👍
@martysheets6882 Жыл бұрын
What a Pilot, Love the Skills.
@riazhassan65702 жыл бұрын
Wow! An amazing piece of modelling
@marktubridy1593 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely beautiful aircraft.
@Vexillifer04 Жыл бұрын
With retractable gear! Remarkable!
@JJ-jt4ji2 жыл бұрын
I saw a documentary on the spitfire. The designer encouraged the pilots to make 3 point Landings.
@lucifer00016 жыл бұрын
Electric start! Now that's really something. Very nice plane. It should have a primer bulb for quicker starts to save on the battery power.
@bernardw48426 жыл бұрын
Just saw another video of a Saito FG57T (twin) on the bench with a home made electric starter, he built in a remote choke on its own servo and channel so he could prime the engine with a few turns under the starter. Then it just started right up every time after that. Was pretty good.
@bernardw48426 жыл бұрын
That's a beautiful model and the on-board starter is cool
@rc-fannl73645 жыл бұрын
Looks amazing. With a moving tail wheel and 4 blade prop, it would have been very hard to tell apart from a real one, when taxiing over that runway. Nice flight, and nice landing.
@Statek633 жыл бұрын
If it had a free moving tail wheel then it would need differential wheel brakes to be controllable on the ground...
@rc-fannl73642 жыл бұрын
@@Statek63 Could that not be overcome by making the tail wheel move along with the rudder? That is how it is on my Mustang RC plane and it has no wheel brakes at all
@zbigniewwozniak61722 жыл бұрын
He has a badge of Polish Air force on the front 👍
@stephenburgess5109 Жыл бұрын
Yes the Poles also flew Spitfires as well as Hurricanes in the RAF
@Statek636 ай бұрын
@@stephenburgess5109 Thank you, we did not know that 😂
@10bkpm2 жыл бұрын
Beautiful!! Squadron 306 Polish
@edwardcase Жыл бұрын
Nice Spitfire! if I had to fly with the throttle on the right-hand stick...IDK...mode 2 flyer here. Best of Luck!
@josephwolf13 жыл бұрын
Best I have ever seen realistic landing.
@derek-press7 жыл бұрын
0:56 now that was pretty damn cool :) beautiful model !
@paolopancrazio95713 жыл бұрын
Bravo. Atterraggio perfetto
@georgevprochazka5316 Жыл бұрын
Would be nice to know what engine and what Spit it is!
@leonardoballoussier59972 жыл бұрын
Meu amigo, depois que o bicho entra e começa a latejar ja era! É simplesmente imparável e eu só tiro depois que o leite saiu todo!
@milescoleman9102 жыл бұрын
I can’t wait for full VR avatar flying of these.
@AmpAbuser6 жыл бұрын
Should have waited till that jet was done flying distracted from the engine sound, real bummer beauty of a plane build well done!
@skyhigh3157 жыл бұрын
Which kit? Scratch? Engine? Thanks for mentioning it's a Spit, but details are nice, too.
@danishjeans4 жыл бұрын
It looks to me like the top rc 35cc spitfire, but Im not sure.
@scotabot78262 жыл бұрын
Was this a Taylor or Reeves design from plans? I sure would love to know how that engine is muffled. Just Beautiful!!
@JRRJ2 жыл бұрын
Beautiful landing
@F3HDemonDriver16 жыл бұрын
Simply smashing Alan!
@nicholasforman1195 Жыл бұрын
Why the two blades prop?
@theganymedehypothesis4057 Жыл бұрын
Is there any way to make something like that with an electric motor and some sort of electronic thing to make 1941 engine noises??
@DepakoteMeister2 ай бұрын
Yes, there is a KZbin video of one.
@Warbird-Aviation2 жыл бұрын
what a nice plane
@bobbysfolly6 жыл бұрын
Terrific video !!!!!!!!!!!
@ОСДОчевидноеСДивана Жыл бұрын
Why not to install a camera in it and enjoy the flight as a pilot?
@stephenang499 Жыл бұрын
Why couldn't they have used a 3 bladed prop?
@mickcarson85042 жыл бұрын
And where can you buy that? 🤔
@MegaControltv3 жыл бұрын
hermoso avión felicitaciones!!!! muy muy buen nivel de detalle y realismo!
@Oldvelocette7 жыл бұрын
Great! What engine did you use?
@johnp1657 Жыл бұрын
Good effort, one guy in front of a spinning propeller and then taxying out behind two guys flying jets, well done guys, ffs
@vanlitespeed6936 жыл бұрын
I'm not so sure I would touch thr propeller with a electric start when the power is hooked up to it. I've seen some nasty finger/hand injuries from props!
@Statek634 жыл бұрын
Possibly the pilot switched the ignition off ?
@robcrawford96577 жыл бұрын
excellent which paints did you use?
@zoomzoom3345 Жыл бұрын
306 Torunski Polish Squadron
@petermoran30412 жыл бұрын
Fantastic!!
@M5guitar12 жыл бұрын
The controls looked too high rate and the throttle could have been backed off a bit. Too bad for the crash. I crashed 2 spitfires due to a stall in a turn.
@pufango40592 жыл бұрын
Get back to building LEGO toys you wanker
@KMSKielce7 жыл бұрын
Great one.
@mikimiki40157 жыл бұрын
Motor brushless kv? Propellers pol.? battery lipo 5s? thank you!!!
@danieldavies45617 жыл бұрын
its petrol engine
@bernardw48426 жыл бұрын
They fly great but if you're into nice machines electrics are simply a power source, not part of the fun in their own right. Personally I find them boring and I'll probably quit RC when they're the only option left. I tried them, they're more expensive and less reliable than people tell you by the time you're ready to fly. The MOTOR's reliable, the whole system's no better than an average engine. Both depend more on the operator anyway. I like tuning and using model engines for the same reason I like modifying cars, it's a hobby in itself. Which not everyone's into, some ppl just want to fly them not tinker. Others enjoy the build just as much and love quality engines. I'm not into 2-strokes much but they suit many people.
@stonegallimore11633 жыл бұрын
No dead sticks for this guy unless he out of fuel of course
@DerredmaxTRIAX7 жыл бұрын
Awesome!
@thebritishpanda65456 жыл бұрын
Why does the spitfire have two propellers im pretty sure it has three not two
@lucifer00016 жыл бұрын
Aren't they supposed to have 4 prop. blades?
@thebritishpanda65456 жыл бұрын
no its three
@NeoAndersonn6 жыл бұрын
3 and 4 blades version. on RC, the 2 blade works better.
@bernardw48426 жыл бұрын
2 bladed props are the most common in RC planes, cheapest to buy and easiest to balance. Balancing is very important or the vibrations can be a big problem. Different versions of the original plane had from 2 to 5 blades over the years but this is most likely for convenience. Plus more blades equals heavier, sometimes you need to find small weight savings either at nose or tail and a heavy prop replaced with a different type is a good method. They don't always go for perfect scale on these models, often it's more about flying them while still being good enough scale to show.
@falconeaterf152 жыл бұрын
Spit mk9 had 4 blades. RC piston engines use two blade as two are more efficient than 3 or 4 for aerodynamic reasons. RC planes can break a lot of props in a season so cost I’m sure is part of it too. Electric motors use 3 and four blades routinely on scale models. So there may be more the story than your getting here. I imagine smooth running electric motors allow for use of softer plastic props whereas piston engines produce a nasty shock when piston fires, requiring harder materials.
@yurycz8933 Жыл бұрын
👍
@mxcollin952 жыл бұрын
If you sold that electric start setup in kit form you’d make a ton of money.
@lasersbee2 жыл бұрын
Those Electric Starter kits are and have been for sale for a bit now.
@mxcollin952 жыл бұрын
@@lasersbee I’ll have to look into that. Seems like a long time coming... Thanks for letting me know.
@ИвановАндрей-о8м Жыл бұрын
Двигатель наверное стоит от герань 2...😁
@boldlionpro28142 жыл бұрын
Noice!
@JetFire92 жыл бұрын
So much attention to scale detail, but didn't bother to make the exhaust come out of the exhaust manifolds.
@gman2060 Жыл бұрын
Why is that so important?
@JetFire9 Жыл бұрын
@@gman2060 That's a really good question, if you are stupid. Does the word scale mean anything to you? Duh.
@gman2060 Жыл бұрын
@@JetFire9 maybe you should check to see if he's put scale wheel nuts on aswell! seen you expect people to do every little detail as if he has built a real spitty. These are toys and everyone will build their planes the way they are happy to fly with. So pull your head in and keep flying your CUB and leave the warbirds to the men.
@dentidens78347 жыл бұрын
great
@carolynpotvin97972 жыл бұрын
Aren’t spitfires british war plaines
@DepakoteMeister2 ай бұрын
Yes, they were. But different countries used them, and we had foreign squadrons (two Polish & one Czechoslovak) flying them during the Battle of Britain.
@poseidonam2 жыл бұрын
Like a kid again!
@januszstaron28112 жыл бұрын
6h6 to
@didiresmana52618 ай бұрын
5
@wildgoobsid53 жыл бұрын
The guys already holding the plane. No need to stand right in front of him and fart!
@stonerman152 жыл бұрын
I’d crash it
@johnnyg15557 жыл бұрын
What a damn shame to have such a nice looking and flying spitfire with a goofy shitty sounding 2 cycle weedeater engine attached. This bird DESERVES to stand apart from the rest...and It would if it were powered with AT LEAST a KOLM IL-100 and even better the IL-155. Having (had) to say that,, I will add that it was a GREAT flight! Very realistic looking.
@ripmax3336 жыл бұрын
an electric motor with a sound system would be even better, totally reliable and a realistic sound best of both worlds.
@bernardw48426 жыл бұрын
They still just sound like a small speaker to me, I do sound systems for a living and what it doesn't do is make me think there's an engine in it. They often get out of sync with what the plane's doing, like playing the cough-splutter start up sample when you're already in the air. Electric *motors* are very reliable but with wiring, battery, ESC faults etc they're often more trouble than any cheap engine. A good engine with someone who knows what they're doing can have every bit as much up-time, most of the problems are the operator. Still I agree the 2-stroke sound doesn't match the great model. I prefer 4-strokes, much better to fly, and I'm into engines anyway so they're a part of the hobby for me. Electric just isn't as fun or interesting to me but I'm not trying to say it's wrong for anyone else, it's just preference. Some of us enjoy the build and the equipment as much as flying it, each to their own.
@bernardw48426 жыл бұрын
They're also bloody expensive, looks like he's already spent a bit on it. Sounds like a DW or other engine from 3D flyers. Plenty of power and cheap. Who knows, maybe the owner doesn't place a big priority on sound, or maybe that's what he had or could afford that would do the job. They don't build them just to please YT viewers after all. If it were me I'd prefer a 4-stroke multi too but it's not mine. I've seen the video I think you're thinking of with the KOLM IL170 Spit, it's awesome but a lot of what you hear is prop noise anyway.
@MrSM19576 жыл бұрын
Lovely model, a shame the starting safety procedures does not match it....with a spectator and photographer wandering around in front of and to one side of the prop arc during the start and taxi to take off. Prop blades can shear and they are only going in one direction!?!