About time Gulfstream and Bombardier had serious competition.
@LanceThompsonKssooner3 жыл бұрын
Bombardier may have some good designs but the company is a complete shit show.
@TChalla0073 жыл бұрын
This is a game changer, range with volume.
@ohwow92573 жыл бұрын
It’s all about brand I mean bombardier also does 7500 miles and I think 78 I mean you have to reas the fine print description and plus those other brands been in the business for a while and they know safety and they also custom make for costumers. So I don’t really see competition other then costumers choice .
@tp54873 жыл бұрын
Not rly lol By the time 10x is out, g750 and global 8500 is probably already on their way
@t.34652 жыл бұрын
@@tp5487 both the G800 and the Global 8000 have been unveiled. The G800 and Global 8000 each have ~8,000 nmi range but the cabins look cramped compared to a Falcon 10x. And on a 7500-8000 nmi journey, you might want to take a break and stretch out your legs anyway, while the plane refuels.
@NicheID3 жыл бұрын
Falcon 10X is the definition of fine art in motion. Can't wait to get on one.
@brandonmahoney4211 Жыл бұрын
Youll have to wait quite a while... we havent even finished the cabinets or interior for the first one yet. Were still working legacy birds
@jacobdouglasoates3 жыл бұрын
I loved how at the end of the video he says we have pandemics and it’s always better to fly safe in a business jet. Wow really I’m sold. Until I heard the pandemic line I wasn’t sure I needed a business jet.
@cjjenson82123 жыл бұрын
If your dumb enough to believe the pandemic is real, go ahead and buy this puddle jumper and I've got some beach front property for you to enjoy being far far away from intelligent humans🤣🤣🤣
@12345fowler3 жыл бұрын
Yeah that's typical salesman bs** take every excuse & spin things to present in favor of their product. Fair games.
@lanemusa15283 жыл бұрын
I guess I'm kinda off topic but does anybody know of a good site to watch newly released tv shows online ?
@dwaynephoenix49473 жыл бұрын
@Lane Musa Flixportal xD
@lanemusa15283 жыл бұрын
@Dwayne Phoenix Thank you, I went there and it seems like they got a lot of movies there :D I really appreciate it !!
@JUSTENization2 жыл бұрын
Proud to say i was part of the engine EBU team. 👍🏻
@umarhazrat99793 жыл бұрын
A very unique technology and engineering of France ...❣️
@philipselden72643 жыл бұрын
Dassault makes the best looking business jets.
@keithclark80303 жыл бұрын
@kajuken Berli Yeah, the G7 still looks great to me as well.
@All.Fathers3 жыл бұрын
I saw a customized 7500 interior by far when the owners pick the customs it’s way nicer. The matte black piano. The all white seats… the black suede carpet…. It’s perfect
@All.Fathers3 жыл бұрын
@kajuken Berli most can’t be filmed as they are owner custom. it’s just a superior aircraft. I was blown away by the little things and the finishes. I’m suppose to try the g700 in a few months excited. But the 650er is not a fair comparison as it’s an older aircraft
@felipessilva52133 жыл бұрын
Yes Brown bisness
@Varaderro3 жыл бұрын
Bombardier 7500 - лучше 🤘🤘😎
@yellowspace3 жыл бұрын
USD 75 Million represents great value for money, stunning plane
@fredbcl48283 жыл бұрын
Amazing airplane ! Bravo Dassault Aviation
@MrStroller4u3 жыл бұрын
I LOVE to work on Falcons over any other business jet. C-Checks are my favorite.
@emilio26473 жыл бұрын
MrStroller4u are you an avionics engineer?🤔
@gumnaamaadmi0073 жыл бұрын
This will be a hit with the Air Charter firms. The timing is perfect too as ultra long range business travel is on the cusp of recovery. On another note, I like how they featured Pago Pago in the range map from NYC. A tropical retreat for the weary board of directors.
@markcash23 жыл бұрын
Ah, nothing like the smell tuna canneries to make the weary board members know they are in a tropical paradise!
@pad9x3 жыл бұрын
pardon my french, but this is fucking amazing 🤯
@JB-pb4wk3 жыл бұрын
French took it to another level 👍🏼👌🏼
@JoostEurovisionFans3 жыл бұрын
Explain.
@urhiredhr4212 жыл бұрын
Really like the new design of the seats.
@WoWaGame13 жыл бұрын
it doesn't quite feel like a falcon without the crosstail
@ThePowerfulMach53 жыл бұрын
thats what i was thinking...was hoping to see a video of a new little falcon 10
@stanleymasterson11353 жыл бұрын
It doesn't feel like a Falcon without three engines
@ZicajosProductions3 жыл бұрын
@@stanleymasterson1135 I agree, but they must keep up with the times to remain competitive. Three engines was just too expensive to maintain!
@papadelta17913 жыл бұрын
@@stanleymasterson1135 Falcon 10/100, Falcon 20/200/20-5, Falcon 2000 Falcon 6X and the 10X all twin engine. Dassault has had more series with twin engines than with 3.
@ianroothman27252 ай бұрын
Love the interior. Modern and different. Cockpit is next level👍
@ademolaakinyemi37433 жыл бұрын
Gulfstream : I can never be challenged Falcon 10x : hold my beer 🍺
@ricmcgre3 жыл бұрын
Except both Gulfstream and Global are 13+ passenger aircraft and the X10 is only a 4 passenger airplane all are plus crew of three. They all have a range of 7500 nautical miles and the price is the same for all of them. If I bought one the number of passengers would be a big part of which one I chose.
@alexcapois3 жыл бұрын
@@ricmcgre 4 passengers ?? I think there is a big issue with your number, try again...
@francishallare2043 жыл бұрын
Richard McGregor it can accomodate 8 pax + 4 crew The cabin dimensions is also way above the gulfstream and Bombardier
@AINvideo3 жыл бұрын
The Falcon 10X will surely be able to accommodate more than 8 pax, but those were the specs provided for the given range, because of the weight that additional passengers add. The competitors will have similar restrictions on passenger capacity to reach the maximum range. Thanks for watching!
@slipnslide93083 жыл бұрын
I’ll stick with Gulfstream lol
@azim81733 жыл бұрын
Beautiful and Amazing. Well done!
@ianroothman27252 ай бұрын
Will swing us to look at Dassault. Well done and well deserved👌
@raviyadav0953 жыл бұрын
Wow these planes are keep motivating me work hard and one day I'll bought them😘😘😘😘
@nalamobil3 жыл бұрын
Only one drawback: It is sadly not a trijet.
@Av8ing123 жыл бұрын
The trijet's time has passed. Falcon needed a competitive product and that means two engines, two big engines. Finally, they seem to be offering speed and range on par with the other manufactures. You can still buy a 900LX or 7/8X if you insist on a three engine aircraft.
@nalamobil3 жыл бұрын
@@Av8ing12 Unfortunately you are right, but still I found it always astounding that The 7x/8x delivered a better fuel burn than competitive models using 2 engines.
@FOH453 жыл бұрын
@@nalamobil yeah me too, trijet looks better... stands out.
@Puzzoozoo3 жыл бұрын
@@nalamobil I think we'll see that the new RR engines will be as fuel efficient, if not more so.
@maxcrypto38723 жыл бұрын
@@Puzzoozoo Would you love to engage in a more profitable business that won't affect your job... But could benefit you weekly?
@aroopghosh13813 жыл бұрын
A much needed aircraft in the Dassault line up . A game changer.
@maxcrypto38723 жыл бұрын
@Steven Strain Would you love to engage in a more profitable business that won't affect your job... But could benefit you weekly?
@georgeandy69233 жыл бұрын
@Steven Strain But I'll take a Rolls or a Bentley!!
@georgeandy69233 жыл бұрын
@Steven Strain Yup... but I'll still take a Rolls or Bentley, LOL!!
@anshulkumar32492 жыл бұрын
@@georgeandy6923 and I will take a Ford or Toyota 🙂
@SDGRTX14553 жыл бұрын
We need this in Microsoft Flight Simulator asap!
@jeremyweekes21263 жыл бұрын
I'm curious to know whether the 10X will have the same performance as the 8X in relation to takeoff & landing distances. I personally think the short takeoff & landing distances of the 8X was a great selling feature for the aircraft. If they can incorporate the existing performance of the 8X & combine it with the size & ULR or the 10X, then I think they'll definitely be onto a winner. Edit: from looking up the specs, the landing distance of the Falcon 8X is 2,150 feet, the landing distance of the Falcon 10X is 2,500 feet (which is the same as the Gulfstream G700), & the landing distance of the Bombardier Global 7500 is 2,450 feet. So with the new Falcon 10X being a direct competitor to Gulfstream's G700 & Bombardier's Global 7500, the Global 7500 is the winner in landing distance.
@ZackWolfMusic3 жыл бұрын
7500 sucks ass
@foxxster35653 жыл бұрын
8x is significantly smaller than the 10x , 80 feet versus 110 feet, lighter max takeoff 73,000 lbs versus 115,000 lbs. range is 1,000 nm less. Why are you bothering to compare them. As for G700, Global 7500 versus 10x landing distance… all the same. 50 feet difference…. nothing. Do you really think people spending $75 million US on a private jet will give a damn about a 50 foot difference in landing distance.
@jeremyweekes21263 жыл бұрын
@@foxxster3565, first of all there is no need to have an argumentative tone my friend. Secondly, it is my understanding (& please correct me if I am wrong) the Falcon 8X has better takeoff & landing capabilities in comparison to other aircraft of comparable size & weight. With that in mind, I thought Dassault might've been able to also bring better takeoff & landing capabilities to the 10X in comparison to the G700 & Global 7500 (which are 2 aircrafts of comparable size & weight to the 10X). Perhaps the better takeoff & landing capabilities of the 8X in comparison to other aircraft of comparable size & weight is due to the tri engine design. Perhaps the third engine provided enough extra thrust during takeoff (& extra reverse thrust during landing) to get it airborne in a shorter distance.
@foxxster35653 жыл бұрын
Well fair enough but 2,150 feet versus 2,500 feet for an aircraft significantly larger and heavier. Yes the Falcons do tend to have better landing performance but for a jet for this size I am not sure what you were exactly expecting, an additional 350 feet is not excessive for the additional weight. The three engines are each not particularly powerful, only around 6,700 pounds thrust each, or the total of all three jets on the 8x are barely more than the 18,000 pounds of each 10x engine. I guess the reason they went with two engines is size limitations of the three engine design, especially the middle engine. I doubt a larger diameter engine would fit. I think part of the short field performance might be the wing design, they seem to have slower landing speeds which obviously translates to less runway required.
@jeremyweekes21263 жыл бұрын
@@foxxster3565, I agree that 2,150 feet vs 2,500 isn't a massive jump when considering the larger size & weight of the 10X (& it's direct competitors in the G700 & Global 7500). However I wasn't aware of the exact specs when I wrote the first paragraph of my original comment. My second paragraph (which I prefaced with the word "edit") was only added to my original comment as an edit after I went & looked up the specs, which is why there is a discrepancy between the first & second paragraph in my original comment.
@aminumohammed7383 жыл бұрын
I hope that the recovery mode system will set a new standard in aviation and will not end up being a new version of MCAS.
@nikobelic42512 жыл бұрын
Recovery mode is activated by the pilots so it shouldn’t be a problem
@morganstud3 жыл бұрын
*Vive la France* 🇫🇷😌
@valuedhumanoid65742 жыл бұрын
A Dassault’s Falcon series aircraft should have a 3x engine setup! That's what makes them so unique and gives that 3 engine feeling of security knowing you have a backup if another goes bad. But I suppose it's more to break and more to go wrong. But still, hard imagining a Falcon with only 2 engines.
@TdotSoul3 жыл бұрын
Does it have cupholders though?
@abhishekbiradar70773 жыл бұрын
Dassault is giving Bombardier and Gulfstream a run for it's money, especially with this
@Lee-in-oz3 жыл бұрын
Why is it missing an engine?
@stephen10.3 жыл бұрын
it's an option
@takenbythewindNdrivenbythesea3 жыл бұрын
Finally, Dassault has come out with something that can rival Gulfstream & Bombardier.
@whalerlife533 жыл бұрын
Yea, well this ain’t it. Think about, the company that sold 7 airplanes last year competing against Gulfstream. Now that’s funny. Go ahead and buy an airplane from a company like that. It won’t end well.
@smartcatcollarproject56993 жыл бұрын
@@whalerlife53 Their official release states 34 Falcon for 2020.
@whalerlife533 жыл бұрын
@@smartcatcollarproject5699 you are correct, they delivered that many. I was off on my number. They sold 15 airplanes in 2020. That’s still abysmal numbers from a competitive standpoint.
@papadelta17913 жыл бұрын
the 7X/8X rivaled the G600/650. The Falcon 900 series rivaled the G450 series
@42441103 жыл бұрын
Awesome jet! Could also serve as inspiration for a 23-33 seat regional jet.....but...
@VivaUkraine223 жыл бұрын
It’s something we’ll never achieve but great video to watch Thank you
@holdensv20003 жыл бұрын
Wow this is great man a new falcon with all the latest tech the competition is in real trouble
@cubworx73973 жыл бұрын
Those interiors are stunning.
@raynoren91853 жыл бұрын
Thank for your work ..
@АлексейКиселев-д2г3 жыл бұрын
Beautiful
@mike3900993 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know who will be supplying the landing gear? Heroux-Devtek got the F6X gear. Also the thrust reverser actuation system? Collins won F6X. So maybe these suppliers are in a good position for the 10X.
@ladanaliyu14823 жыл бұрын
For its longer range and luxurious interior design, now I will select Falcon 10x over Gulfstream G700 or BG 7500. But where is third engine which make Dassault unique from the other business jets?
@CobaltLancer3 жыл бұрын
Now that’s sick. -Someday I’ll make sure to get one-
@calebupton40233 жыл бұрын
Would love to see on MSFS 2020
@YorranKlees2 жыл бұрын
I'm watching the video right now, and this is exactly what I was thinking about. I'm into long-range business jets, and this is exactly what I would go for. Sadly for now, the market has not opened enough on these products in FS.
@calebupton40232 жыл бұрын
@@YorranKlees I'm into it as well and it would be awesome ...we can only hope we will get some some day... I hardly have time to sim anymore ..kids and wife lol....I think I may even try flight Simulator X there's a youtuber that does the reenactments of crashes and he uses X alot his stuff looks great in 4k 60Fps
@ohno19543 жыл бұрын
So I was ordering a global 7500 but now switching to this 😂😂😂
@simply_just_better3 жыл бұрын
2022 is a long wait
@davecrupel28173 жыл бұрын
I was wondering when Dassault was going to create a ULR plane. Looking forward to it!
@danwayment68423 жыл бұрын
Beautiful. Where is the 3rd engine?
@kushpatel72043 жыл бұрын
Are those seats just for this presentation or are they going to be used in the real jet as well? They look cool but probably aren’t the most comfortable to be sat on, from what they look like. You can’t have a leg support because of the rounded base or a flat bed because of the tapering seat back. Hopefully this is just for the sake of the presentation. But love the jet regardless
@fabricetchen93103 жыл бұрын
Wonderfull Work ! So much new and perfect technologies..
@taichigoodness1798 Жыл бұрын
What a beauty!
@DanO530.810 ай бұрын
How do those chairs lay down to make a sleeping area like the other seats on jets
@АлександрБурмин-р6л3 жыл бұрын
Enjoy the flights and wonderful memories.
@foxxster35653 жыл бұрын
How does the single thrust lever for both engines work in the case of a single engine failure on takeoff.
@stephen10.3 жыл бұрын
industrial secret
@dingodango13 жыл бұрын
When you reject a takeoff you always bring both (or all 3) thrust levers to idle anyway. Now you just bring one back to idle as it should be.
@foxxster35653 жыл бұрын
Not rejecting takeoff. How about after v1. You are going ahead with the takeoff then just before the nose wheel lifts, an engine failure or fire… anyway apparently they have three mini thrust levers as well or something. I hope in real life when seconds are critical it doesn’t add confusion especially for someone relatively new to this type. Seeing as every other jet is different. www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2021-02-01/dassault-adds-more-smarts-falcon-autothrottles
@dingodango13 жыл бұрын
@@foxxster3565 if you have a failure after V1 you just make sure all the thrust levers are full anyway. So I this case, your only thrust lever is already at takeoff power. Seems like a perfect scenario to me
@papadelta17913 жыл бұрын
Its all controlled digitally. Doesnt matter if there is one lever or two. The failed engine gets rolled back to flight to flight idle or shut down. The remaining engine takes over. There is no mechanical attachment to the fuel controls from the throttle levers.
@sjgreene7853 жыл бұрын
Congratulations! Up up & away... One day.. BTW..it is SICK (that is a good thing)!!
@vasudharakshit3 жыл бұрын
ergonomic cockpit chairs. Should be in the lounge areas too. 18.5.21
@worldtrekker67542 жыл бұрын
Will be 2 engine instead of 3 engine?
@kevinmclemore14762 жыл бұрын
Liking.the 8x better. Liking the recovery button. Need more information on the throttle system.
@AgentSmith9113 жыл бұрын
I just need to win like a billion dollars in the lottery first so that I can afford to buy it and own it and run it 😹
@santoshgurung6383 жыл бұрын
Same here
@nickgeorgiou77703 жыл бұрын
You’ll need double that not only to buy it but also to fly it and maintain
@darkmath1003 жыл бұрын
Great plane, great features but is it just me or does the shape look a little off, like a line zigged when it should have zagged? It looks like a pregnant sturgeon from certain angles. 1:18
@kolokolok3 жыл бұрын
Haha i agree with you! The reason is that the front nose is pointier and its upper section takes a concave line. Doesn’t look appealing at all. But overall a great new plane.
@jsurfin13 жыл бұрын
Yeah looks like a duck. Wish it had the 8X's nose shape instead.
@Eltoca213 жыл бұрын
Stunning
@claudineipereira76062 жыл бұрын
Obrigado por mostrar 🙆🏿♂️👀💰🇧🇷
@khmostafizurrahman89423 жыл бұрын
What are the price of this aircruft
@einundsiebenziger54883 жыл бұрын
What is* the price of this aircraft* ?* If you have to ask you can't afford it. And they said around 75 million Euros shortly after the beginning of this video.
Why am I watching this. This plane is nicer than my house, and my house can only move as fast as the tectonic plate will take me
@happycamper44833 жыл бұрын
I need to test fly in that one, so I tell you for sure !
@bazabal13 жыл бұрын
Wait what’s the cost per hour to operate this bird?
@markcash23 жыл бұрын
Operating costs depend on fuel costs of course, but speculating on just the engine type and projected speed I figure about $5k per hour.
@bazabal13 жыл бұрын
@@markcash2 disagree. Am sure it's about 13k to 15 an hour
@markcash23 жыл бұрын
@@bazabal1 You'd be way wrong. Just based on a similar plane which should have a similar operating cost, the G550 has an operating cost of about $4600 per hour. That is a known cost assuming regular flying where the fixed costs are spread out and added to the variable costs over a year's worth of flying. The new planes are much more efficient than the older G550 so of course the operating cost will be much lower. I just guessed on my first comment, I've actually researched the costs for my company since then. We're looking at approximately $4300/hour to operate the G700, that number is from Gulfstream. I think you are looking at projected charter rates, not actual operating costs. The Falcon uses pretty much the same engines with the same fuel burn so roughly the same operating cost.
@ruslanulko81952 жыл бұрын
Looks great 👍🏻
@greghemlock66793 ай бұрын
I’ll take two do they have financing?
@JB-so5gr3 жыл бұрын
I'm deeply disappointed that they didn't opt for a tri-jet, that is after all their unique selling point.
@osaroosayande26663 жыл бұрын
It's cheaper maintaining 2 engines than 3
@JB-so5gr3 жыл бұрын
@@osaroosayande2666 They're much more efficient, leading to overall costs being around the same. But even if it were to cost more, it would go fairly unnoticed at this level... What's an extra $100K a year when your already spending in the millions, especially when it brings such peace of mind when crossing oceans, etc
@osaroosayande26663 жыл бұрын
@@JB-so5gr trijet are not that economical. This is why the McDonald Douglas Trijet eventually failed and led to their bankruptcy. Customers prefer less ,more engine equals more expense in the future. For example it's cheaper to for two kids than 3 😂🤣
@jsurfin13 жыл бұрын
It had to ditch the 3rd engine for speed. It just wasn't possible aerodynamically.
@jeremyweekes21263 жыл бұрын
To build an ULR aircraft of this size, fuel efficiency is paramount. You simply will get better fuel efficiency from a twin engine design rather than a tri engine design. It is the same reason the commercial airline industry is moving away from 4 engine designs (like the 747) & opting instead for long haul twin engine designs like the Boeing 777X & Airbus A350.
@idanceforpennies2813 жыл бұрын
It's about time Dassault joined the 21st Century. The current models are ancient.
@charlenejohnson57693 жыл бұрын
Dassault Falcon 10x🤩😁. SOMEDAY😍
@erickonassis63102 жыл бұрын
Where is the 3rd engine
@TChalla0073 жыл бұрын
SFO/LAX to Singapore a no go. Still think this is the most amazing Biz jet and at my height of 6'6" . I love this plane.
@hamsterking912 жыл бұрын
But it can make it to from BWI to Okinawa..so it's good for me..C'mon Crypto daddy need a Jet!
@TChalla0072 жыл бұрын
@@hamsterking91 🤣🤣🤣
@TChalla0072 жыл бұрын
@@hamsterking91 I played in Kawasaki for 3 season. I love and miss Japan. This plane can do SFO to Narita.
@hamsterking912 жыл бұрын
@@TChalla007 Well then u know my friend stop and fill it up in Roppongi LOL
@TChalla0072 жыл бұрын
@@hamsterking91 I remember Motown very well. I had a female Japanese friend who was a designer that got me into an exclusive casino. As long as I gambled, drinks and food were free. I was the only American there let alone black America. They always treated me with respect.
@tylordid26953 жыл бұрын
Humidity is a huge problem. Airbus has one about to be released that will destroy the competition. Good luck guys.
@boeingdriver293 жыл бұрын
Tres jolie !
@aliens.85603 жыл бұрын
Might put this on the list, waiting for AMC squeeze to finalize.
@bonsamaritain62383 жыл бұрын
Me too!!!
@billc67623 жыл бұрын
Can it out run a J-15 or J-20?
@jangofett58063 жыл бұрын
Once again Dassault is playing catch up the same thing happened in the early 90’s when they scrapped what become the falcon 7X decades later. Dassault didn’t think there was a market for a 5000nm jet when Gulfstream proposed the G5. Well that was a success and then came the Global Express. G550 Global 6000 and finally the Falcon 7X. I’m glad to see that Dassault is going to make a 7500 nm business jet. I loved my years flying the 2000LXS. Hopefully the crew lav and rest compartment will be bigger then the 8X.
@CharlieGolfAviation3 жыл бұрын
Very nice indeed!
@MizaelRosaEUA3 жыл бұрын
Amazing!
@moneyprinter92693 жыл бұрын
with around 20 million dollar/ a third of this jet's price, you can get a 40 meter superyacht with a lot of watertoys like, jet skis, sea bob, etc
@YepTriedToTellYouАй бұрын
Correct me if I’m wrong but I think the Gulfstream G800 has greater range and greater speed. The price appears to be about the same.
@randallranchnorth88403 жыл бұрын
Did they borrow a front end from a Hondajet?
@samuelfitzpatrick97393 жыл бұрын
Can it be operated by one pilot?
@captainbob27382 жыл бұрын
No, not according to regulations. It is certified to have 2 crew members. Most large aircraft have this requirement
@sanpedrosilver3 жыл бұрын
Luxury in the sky 👍🏼
@trig79213 жыл бұрын
Really stunning
@keneferdinand97613 жыл бұрын
Please how many hours can it fly nonstop…. Kudos falcon
@JoostEurovisionFans3 жыл бұрын
All the French people in the comment section are so proud. It's funny to see how they flex, as if they know the technical differences between Gulfstream and Bombardier, other than what they hear in the video.
@12345fowler3 жыл бұрын
I am not french and I believe Dassaults make the best business jets. It's a work of arts for them, others manufacturers are only just building a plane, Dassault craft them like an "oeuvre d'art". Check how each manufacturer choose to bolt their wing on their tubes and you will understant what I mean.
@bubbafatas25883 жыл бұрын
It looks like a commuter!
@devendrachowhan61473 жыл бұрын
I thought G700 was real deal but this OMG
@robbrie Жыл бұрын
The costs of having to stop for a refuel, are little more than time & money...unless you're a fugitive fleeing prosecution and you need the additional range to be out of reach of the authorities before they can catch you. Given the expected service life of the aircraft, will the incremental cost of its extended range be financially viable to the buyer?
@shawnbyers62913 жыл бұрын
Nice looking jet
@khardinnkhamiss64433 жыл бұрын
how much
@himmetramthakur65252 жыл бұрын
How made 10x made in fatory
@VMRDY3 жыл бұрын
It’s not “Bengalore”, it’s Bengaluru. On another note, for some reason the 10X doesn’t look as sleek as the G700 or as firm as the Global 7500. But gotta appreciate Dassault for the the larger cabin in the 10X.
@salimx3 жыл бұрын
Literally nobody gives a shit outside India. Relax.
@gumnaamaadmi0073 жыл бұрын
@@salimx Fortune 500 companies do. You relax.
@einundsiebenziger54883 жыл бұрын
You do know that many cities have different names in different languages! London is Londres in French, Rome is Roma in its native Italian, Cologne is Köln in German etc. Bengalore is simply what it's called in French and most other European languages. Deal with it.
@VMRDY3 жыл бұрын
@@einundsiebenziger5488 Einund is called Eunuch in Hindi. Deal with it.
@jurajstec28833 жыл бұрын
Why did they skip 9X?
@Av8ing123 жыл бұрын
Maybe they are saving it for the SST Falcon?
@taneyadasmandal19013 жыл бұрын
For the same reason iphone 9 doesn't exist
@fkaptijn71113 жыл бұрын
Google on falcon 9 and you see the answer.
@taneyadasmandal19013 жыл бұрын
@@fkaptijn7111 yeah totally forgot that the 9x exists Maybe googling stuff before making comments is better
@wowdude223 жыл бұрын
Beauty
@yeeyiceng88533 жыл бұрын
Where's the third engine ?I konw the French jets doesn't need it anymore, but it's awesome and individual.