A GREAT Starter Amplifier! NAD Integrated Amplifier • NAD C 338 Review

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

★ *NAD C338* bit.ly/3gp85NF or amzn.to/364SH37 ★ *QOTD: What are your thoughts on NAD’s hybrid amp direction?* ★ *COMMENT RULES: Please be respectful. No outside links, URLs, email addresses, etc.*

[@OHMAudioChannel]

Class-D amps these days I think get to have a seat at the table of Hi-Fi. Sure there will always be the purists and hold outs, but if I can get a meaningful, powerful, performance out of an amp that doesn't moonlight as a space heater and requires a fork lift to move, I'm all for it! One feature I wish NAD had included with this integrated is AirPlay. Yeah you have Chromecast, but it's not supported on Amazon HD so sadly it doesn't work in my use case.

[@F1fletch]

Hi Andrew It’s about time you did more NAD ....(Napoleon dynamite rolls eyes)....lol I too started my “real” hi- fi journey with an old integrated I bought 30yrs ago. Once I went NAD, I am kind of a lifer now. I just purchased a C368 with an NAD C588 table and RP-8000F’s I Can report back once I get it all setup. That being said, class D is here to stay, NAD has invested a great deal into their class D designs and they aren’t everyone else’s designs. I may look to upgrade the phono stage to another model and eventually add the blue sound or HDMI ports. Keep up the great content, you are top of the heap with your channel, productions and reviews I give all the credit to your wife!!

[@TheLkdude]

@Andrew, Any thoughts of Technics SU-G700 vs Other Class-D amp's? I know it is not fair to compare from a price point perspective, but capability wise, what are your thoughts.

[@rfgate]

The outtakes gives your reviews an even more human feel. Keep them going. Maybe get the missus to appear with you and have a face to face discussion?? 👍👍👍

[@1Geeble7]

Nnnn;nn b;nn mm N nn ;/n;nn mmm;

[@duncs52]

Many of us started our path with a NAD. Mine was a 20 year old 3020 in college. Still have it. Still great.

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

No doubt it still sings! Thanks for tuning in!

[@russfelger]

The 3020 is the legend that set the bar.

[@sesioramadhan5137]

3020 and 3020i are some real deal until today.. great Sounding and Pretty reliable

[@OhNoIguanas]

My first was a 306 and it still runs just fine

[@HLF20]

That’s the amazing thing with Hi-Fi components, once you got a decent amp/turntable/preamp, you are set for years.

[@shanecabbage2187]

Completely digging the CONVERSATION portion. There is something organic when two people exchange thoughts. It is nice to hear a second opinion without searching elsewhere; and you are appealing to another audience: my wife is appreciative of a woman's opinion. Thank you, as always, and God bless.

[@BuckyJoe00]

My favorite part is actually the conversation they have at the end of the reviews. I love hearing their input and just coversating about both their thoughts. Especially because his wife is new to all of it, kinda bridges what a conversation with a non-audiophile and an audiophile would have. They both share a love for music and they’re explaining what they each hear, yet still relating to most of the same aspects.

[@Gnawcx]

That Remote! I can't tell if I'm controlling an amplifier or turning down my ceiling fan.

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

😂😂😂

[@ChuvaLemos]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@Kinzorallah]

I felt the same way with my older NAD I had! 🤣

[@83Goldy]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@baabdesigns9179]

Haha

[@joeythedime1838]

I had the C338's big brother - NAD C 388 Hybrid Digital DAC Amplifier powering a pair of Polk LSiM 705's. I ran this for about 6 months. For me it felt like something was missing. I swapped out the C 388 for a Cambridge CXA81. Even though I gave up many features and some power to the C 388 - I found the CXA81 to be a much better fit for me. A fuller sound with a bigger sound stage. About six years ago I had an excellent NAD C 375BEE. The 375BEE was a strong integrated that hit above it's class. Based on my experience I preferred the NAD class A/B designs.

[@TheMatsushitaMan]

Let's see how those poor quality electrolytic capacitors in the Cambridge hold up.

[@joeythedime1838]

@@TheMatsushitaMan This is my third system that runs music for a vacation home and I consider most integrated's in this price range (I picked up the CXA81 for $995USD) having a shelve life and being "semi-disposable", although I might think about recapping when needed. I found that the C388 was a little rolled off in the top end and slightly soften some of bass. In the end NAD's implementation of the Hypex’s “Ultimate Class D” (or ucD) power module didn't do it for me. My primary listening system revolves around a T+A PA3100HV integrated.

[@thethirdman225]

I have been living with a C338 for six years and I have a bit of a love-hate relationship with it. Before I describe my experience with it, I need to point out that I don't play vinyl so I have no comment to make on the phono stage or how well it pairs. *What I love about it:* - Connectivity is excellent, though I'd have preferred one or two more analogue inputs because I have a few old bits and pieces I've collected over the years but I'm being lazy. For most people this will not matter a jot. The WiFi implementation is excellent. - Grunt. Power is fantastic. I had a NAD 3020B before the C338 and it always required bass boost. The C338 doesn't and I've never used it. In contrast to your experience, I had zero need to crank up to levels above what I was used to. This thing is a beast. Matched to a pair of Dynaudio X34s, It creates a big sound, not lacking in subtlety but responding with lightning speed and precision. *What I don't love about it:* - Very clinical (well, the amp's job is to amplify, not colour the sound). This amplifier has very low tolerance for poor recording. Since I listen to more classical than modern, this tends to be less of a problem. But to compare a classical recording to a remastered digital recording can really highlight the problems. I have some Deutsche Grammophon 'Archiv' recordings from the 1980s which were incredibly well done, all-digital recordings of stunning sonic purity. I recently compared them directly to a remaster of Pink Floyd's 'Wish You Were Here' and the comparison was revealing in ways a lot of people won't like. Too bad. The Pink Floyd remaster sounded like it was recorded on cardboard. It was flat and colourless - totally at odds with everything I've come to know of that band - while the 'Archiv' recordings just soared and rolled beautifully past me with an unmatched soundstage and presence. The C338 takes no prisoners. - The Burr-Brown DAC is a bit hit or miss for me. After six years I'm still unsure so I'm messing around with a third party DAC to see if I can identify the problem. - No USB input. This was not a problem when I bought it but it has become a problem now. My fault to some extent because I didn't see it coming. On the other hand, I have work arounds. If you're a classical listener, you might find this to your liking. It's very precise but intolerant of anything but the best quality recordings. For a lot of modern music it can make the spotty-faced 20 year-old producer genius look like an idiot... Don't start me on loudness wars. I don't recommend this to beginners in hifi. It's just too unforgiving. But for more experienced and selective listeners who are prepared to spend time matching it to the rest of their system and their room, it can be a great amp. I found the finish to be inferior - by some margin - to the 3020B it replaced and inferior to the likes of Arcam but I also think it is easily good enough for the money.

[@banginghats2]

I remember hearing an NAD 3020 back in 1979. What a legend that amp was.

[@Deke1]

legend indeed, sold between 1.2 and 1.4 million units for NAD

[@drtod]

I own the C368. Regarding build quality: from factory is poor. The C368 came from factory with loose screws rattling around inside the unit. I had to disassemble and screw down the freely moving about screws from all the circuit boards as the circuit boards were only mounted by 1 or 2 screws as a result. The screws all seemed to loosen up from shipping, not a single screw was tight. 1 screw was completely missing (could not be found). I called NAD customer support to have them ship me the missing screw and left 2 voice mail messages, nobody returned my calls. The speaker connectors are made of cheap plastic and their is no speaker post support. If you are connecting speaker wires with banana plugs, be aware the connection point on back of NAD C368 will greatly flex to an uncomfortable level upon making the connection. Regarding sound quality: It is excellent. I also agree with Andrew's review regarding the DAC performance. I listen mostly to rock and jazz. The NAD DAC sounds "clinical" to me. If I front-end the signal with the Schiit Bi-frost 2, wow, just wow. The music really comes alive as if you are physically in the studio room. The NAD BlueOS and streaming services are also A+ features and work flawlessly. My summary is: excellent features, excellent sound quality, no customer support, questionable factory assembly. After all of that, the unit seems to work just fine after 8 months, but I still would like my missing screw from NAD.

[@johncardenas5906]

Love the conversation session. I'd love to see more of that. Have her on camera next to you. She represents exactly where I am in my audiophile journey with access to someone like you. It's also a way to get my partner interested in all the money I'm spending on upgrades and new gear. I bought the Marantz NR1200 because I showed her your review episode.

[@thomasward00]

I'm not ready to give up on AB Amps yet.

[@eanhalt1]

I own a NAD C388 and one thing that absolutely floored me is how much better it sounded after about 100 hours of use. The bass improved and the soundstage opened up even more. Fantastic amp for the bucks. Anyone else experienced this?

[@trent_nathan3889]

I really don't wanna be that guy but that's literally impossible. How can electronics "bReAk In"?

[@eanhalt1]

@omarchafa yeah, I laid off the scotch. Seriously though, quite a few reviews of electronics state the reviewer let the product "burn in" for about 100 hours. Go figure.

[@sonicyouth29]

I have one too and i love the sound of it

[@jamesmackinlay4477]

@@trent_nathan3889 Well normally I would not respond to a question like this HOWEVER it is a great question. Being a broadcast engineer for coming up on 30 years now I can tell you that indeed it is possible for some electronic parts to how was it said, to break in. It is not that they are breaking in however it isn't uncommon in the engineering world (And I am talking about actually designing the circuits not just repairing them) to see certain electronic components change value when run for a while. For a simple way to put it lets just use the biasing circuit for something like output transistors. Lets pretend this, a component like a simple resister helps control the biasing of a transistor in the audio chain. Well after 500 hours of use or whatever it might be now the resister has changed value from heat or maybe it was part of a bad batch that was made. I know a lot about this I buy them by the hundreds at a time or used to. Anyway the bias resister changes value so instead of it being lets say 25K at 2 watts it is now 35k so the resistance went up and now it changed the operating characteristics of that transistor in the audio chain which can and does have a effect on the sound output. This happens way more than most people would think not only in amps but in everything these days the example I gave what is a VERY simple example but it goes to show that yes it is entirely possible for that to happen.

[@danielbarrera6880]

Hi Andrew , I Bought the NAD C 316 BEE with the Bluesound NODE , in my case using my previously purchased DALI OBERON 7 speakers , and the result was and is magic !!! It's amazing how that little amp drives the Oberon 7 speakers with only 40W RMS but with more than 200 of Damping Factor !!! , I prefer the punch of the NAD class AB with the beautiful Toroidal Transformer inside, (I have sold my new NAD C 368 80 W class D Amp with the inside Bluesound 2i card previously purchased ) ,The NAD C 316 BEE has a different mood of sound, is hard to explain, and I think sounds much more harmonic, robust in the pounch to my ears and also much warmer with the Oberon 7 over the Class D Hipex Hibrid AMP like the NAD C 368 that I have solded, I always watch your interesting videos and I learn a lot with your logic, I am a subscriber, Thank you very Much !!!! Greetings from Argentina !!!

[@mrpink3630]

older Nads are the most organic sounding amps you can buy. period. the 7125 is one of the best amps ive ever heard to this day. vocals and instruments are felt.

[@pnoykenshin]

I started with a NAD D3020. Lovely amp, very accessible to beginning audiophiles and it had a sub preout! Plus their power ratings are actually legit.

[@gelderlandproduction]

Love the conversations at the end of your reviews. A great added value. Thank you.

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

Thank you for sticking around until the end. We appreciate it!

[@KristiWright]

Thank you so much for watching!

[@michaelmadore4855]

It was very much the same conversation I have with my wife... Great review!

[@ThePipeFox]

I have the C328 and absolutely love it. Currently it's bi-wired to a pair PSB Image T5s and I definitely get that 'just one more song' vibe every single time I sit down to listen to the system.

[@RAINBOWbelongsTOtheKIDS]

I used to enjoy NAD C320 paired with Dali AXS 5000 for 20+ years. Never thought about any upgrade. I could afford times more expensive system but… there was no need, as I was completely satisfied with my system sound. Recently C 320 passed away. It looks like 338 is my next NAD.

[@benjamingrow8904]

I love when you show off your nads 👍🏼 thanks 😂

[@cameronkrause4712]

I wish that I had never sold my nad bee c320. It sounded better than a lot of amps that came after it.

[@jeffw.1854]

The NAD 3140 integrated amp was the amp the put NAD on the audio map. The 3140 was a 40 watt amp that sounded like 100 watts and performed like one also . It' had loads of headroom with a feature called 'soft clipping' which had a tube sound. NAD was an unknown brand when it was released, it no longer is!

[@MichaelMoese]

I just bought a C368 after Testing it for a few days. I absolutely love it

[@jasonme3557]

I was looking at this for the HDMI out. I think that might be a good combo. What speakers if I may ask?

[@MichaelMoese]

@@jasonme3557 I have a pair of Dali Opticon 6, it's a nice combination

[@jasonme3557]

@@MichaelMoese nice. I will try them soon. Just ordered a set of BRO3's price was real good

[@audioaficionado9494]

I'm moving to separate components. DACs in particular are continuing to improve. However I can appreciate the simplicity of a good integrated amplifier.

[@cheapaudioman]

Solid review. Wanting to grab something from NAD and this might be the one

[@RasheedKhan-he6xx]

Cool! Looking forward to your take on it.

[@alexandrebelanger1046]

Bought this amp 6 month ago replacing NAD C316. Really a different sound.. but so good ! Sound really clean and yes there is little less dynamic compare to the classe AB C316 but the sound is so smooth, there is just something about it that is nice and warm.. and it really is good to listen for hours it's never getting annoying to listen to. I was worried about the classe D amp but they seriously make something good out of it. I was tired for looking for ''THE AMP'' under 1000$ . This amp is good for all kind of music and plug the TV in the interne DAC for movie and was really suprised, big sound coming out of it. !! Anyway really good amp overall.

[@adamtaylor9617]

I started with NAD as well and still have a 3020 in my office system. They are just so musical

[@Richard1977]

It's a little know fact that most high end Class D amplifiers have their origin in the Netherlands and Belgium with those companies all originating to the same company. As a Dutch guy, I am a bit proud of that fact! I switched to d&b Audio D12 Class D amplifiers back in 2003 for my pro audio needs and could definitely hear and feel a difference with P1200s that I had been using up until then. Like a blanket had been lifted from my speakers. Nicer and tighter bass, more detailed and refined mids and highs and more control over the speakers. Plus a huge weight saving which helps with setting up your system 2 times a night. For home use in my living room I recently switched from a Denon AVR-1706 to a Marantz M-CR412, mostly because I only have and had a 2.0 stereo system and wanted to have a compacter and weight-friendlier system. All of the benefits I experienced before when switching to the D12s applied. In fact, I liked it so much that my old DENON PMA-525R in my study/home office (which I had for over 25 years) got the boot and was replaced with another Marantz M-CR412. I was planning on buying Denon RCD-M41DAB or Onkyo but decided to spend the extra cash as I knew what I was getting and I already was more than happy with that. So happy days!

[@Richard1977]

I do however have a very old (45 years and counting) and reliable National Panasonic SU-2300 (based on a STK043) amplifier that gets a regular spin. It's really has that old mellow sound which is quite enjoyable.

[@grayfool]

Loved NAD since the original 3020 back in the early eighties. That was a true game changer at the time. This looks like a great bit of kit. Nice one.

[@calsol22]

This is my first amp. I have it paired with klipsch RP 600m bookshelves. I do enjoy it. I have had it in three different areas in my home. It has decent power. After about 3 months of listening, I knew I wanted a little more in detail. At low everyday listening volumes.. it’s lacking something. Honestly don’t know if it’s the speakers or amp. The remote leaves a lot to be desired. I don’t have anything really to negative to say about it, just the feeling of wanting a little more.

[@garykarlin1777]

First of all, I'm also an NAD fan. My second amp was an NAD, and I used it happily for 20+ years. Having said that, yes, someone who uses a phono front end with something like an Ortofon 2M Black (your choice) would likely want a better phono stage. But the cost of that cartridge alone is close to the price of the NAD! IOW, not a likely match.

[@dnburgess]

Great review. Like others here, I appreciated the conversation segment. My first amp was the original NAD 3020 which I bought new in the late 70s. It served me reliably for forty years and I only sold it when I moved from Oz to the US. During that time I also owned a much more expensive audiophile amp which, although intellectually "better", I never found as emotionally satisfying as the little NAD. The $500 to $1000 integrated space is pretty hotly contested. By my reckoning, there are 42 amps from 28 manufacturers available from US-based retailers in this range. (That is integrateds only and doesn't include receivers.) Manufacturers include many-storied firms such as Arcam, Audiolab, Cambridge, Creek, Denon, ELAC, Leak (without the case), Marantz, Musical Fidelity, Pro-Ject, Rega, Rotel, TEAC, and Yamaha. A real embarrassment of riches. I contend we are living in a golden age of hi-fi. Limiting the selection to integrateds with DACs still yields 30 amps from 20 manufacturers. If the field is further restricted to those with phono preamps, and WIFI - the pickings are pretty slim. Just the NAD, Marantz PM7000N and Peachtree decco25 SKY. The latter two are c. $300 more expensive than the NAD. So the NAD looks like a rare bargain.

[@roberterickson4736]

I have a NAD 3045 from around 1978. It's a fantastic piece and sounds great.

[@jamesmackinlay4477]

The NAD C399 is out now more power and is class c if you get a chance have a look at that one.

[@rolandlickert2904]

I have the NAD C-388 that fits my needs flexibly to upgrade with various Modules and drive my Dynaudio speaker very well and to shine they do need power! I had the NAD S-300 for 20 years a nice warm-sounding amp. But innovation moves on and the 388 has it all in what I like and need.

[@grimreaper-qh2zn]

My first "real" Amp was the memorable NAD 3020. That was 40 years ago. My goodness there wasn't even CD's in those days. Moving up speakers and getting my Linn LP12 meant the 3020 was at the limit and needed replacing. By the way my 3020 cost £80......

[@philipthrockmorton6039]

The conversation segment was really helpful for me, as someone who has only heard a couple amplifiers, to get a better idea of what the practical differences are between this and a lot of the other products out there. Im in the market for something in this price range to move up from an entry level yamaha receiver and i felt you described the sound and features about as well as is possible through a youtube video.

[@ruvamsi]

Great review as always thx! If I was starting over, this amp would be on my shortlist. The lack of USB is my only gripe on paper. Suggestion: Mrs. Robinson should state her opinion first in the conversation and prompt you to react. I think it would feel a bit more natural with her being off camera. Especially since you guys agree on most points, it feels a bit off when she reiterates some of your points off camera. I look forward to the next one!

[@metaljoe9088]

Nad is a great brand. I still use a nad 326. Awesome amp

[@jeffhunter4395]

Yep,I'm using the 326bee also.

[@JackTheladd]

I have this amp powering my Triangle BRO 3's. Sounds great through Tidal. I don't need a sub. Got a great deal, just under $500.00 CAD.

[@KobusvanAswegen]

Really enjoy your channel. My first "real amp" was a NAD C325BEE with Kef iQ3s. Still regret selling that combo. Enjoy the conversation at the end, with your wife. It is not all that common that one's wife shares one's passion for audio / hi-fi etc. Keep up this excellent channel. Thanks!

[@Celestialrob]

Love NAD, my first was a Rotel. Now it’s Naim active 😆

[@jb-zr7nw]

These are the best audio reviews I have seen. I own an older, NAD T761, which sadly, has had issues with one channel and I'm done fixing it. I would buy another one and based on this, I would go up one model for more power.

[@rosemeyer1939]

For the final discussion, get you both in front of the camera... Good back and forth, and interesting! Still got my NAD 3020 running in the kitchen every day.

[@mbcastle1]

I just bought the C328, as I decided I could live without the wifi/Google Assistant connectivity (and a little less power) for $100 less. Absolutely love the sound, the small size, and the lack of heat. I do wish they had included tone controls, but I'm actually ok without them, as I try to run flat anyway. What I really wish it had, though, is a switch to disable the sub for late-night listening.

[@quicktoevil]

...would you purchase the C328 again? Any shortcomings other than sub out?

[@mbcastle1]

@@quicktoevil I think so. Still loving the sound, simplicity, and small footprint.

[@yannik2675]

I got myself a used NAD for 360€ a few weeks ago and I'm really happy with it. More than enough power and small enough for a desk Setup.

[@ChoySekMunSimon]

Good insight into this NAD integrated. One of my early amplifiers during my college period was the NAD 302 base amplifier which I cut my teeth on my music listening journey. I still keep the 302 and it now makes music for my kids in their bedroom but with a Bluetooth audio receiver. The recent improvements in AptX and better Bluetooth audio receivers also had me adding in a BT box for the boys to stream and listen to content from their tablets and cellphones.

[@carlchristensen584]

My first receiver was a Sony 25watt receiver. Not enough power, but a very sweet sound. I replaced it with an NAD 7130. Same amps section (I am told) as the 2030 integrated amp. I liked the 7130 a lot, but it's tuner section wasn't as clean sounding as the Sony. A number of years later, I still had it around the house. It's speaker selector switch was causing issues and could not easily be replaced. A friend gave me a pair of Infinity RS2.5s. I ran those with a larger amp for a while (those infinity speakers are very power hungry). But I soon switched the big main amps back to my regular speakers. Not wanting to totally abandon the Infinities, I connected them to the NAD 7130. While extremely loud volumes of sound were not possible, it was this combination that sliced the most sweet sounds.

[@charlespurviskellyjr.7210]

The NAD C-338 is really nice, and it is on my shortlist now. And as likable as I find the NAD C-338 to be, for just a few hundred dollars more, I am also liking the Marantz PM7000N. Has the around the same amount of amplifier power as the NAD C-338, but in addition, has a toroidal transformer and dual separate power supplies, has fully discrete current feedback, and has a 24-bit/192kHz high resolution streamer built-in with HDAM-SA3 circuitry and an AK4090EQ DAC (all built into one package). Also has a built-in M/M Phono Stage. AND ALL FOR… $1,200.00 All I got to is add speakers, turntable/phono cartridge and a small subwoofer or two to round out the whole system (I got a Turntable and a TV already), and for a little over $3,500.00, I’ll have a complete system then. What do you think about this piece Andrew & Kristi? -Charles-

[@davidangel-blair9358]

Thank you Andrew & Kristi. Great video!

[@TomArys]

The C338 is awesome value, I have it connected to my Dali Opticon 6 and it sounds great! Class D is my preference too. The only thing I'm missing is hdmi input.

[@shanecabbage2187]

With regard to the last question: I am definitely looking for a great sounding class D integrated. Living in FL, I absolutely do not need any extra "space heaters" in my home using electricity continually, and forcing my AC to work harder to keep the house cool.

[@Nick-gm3ui]

I purchased a NAD C338 just before last Christmas. Its running through a pair of Q Acoustics 3030's. I've previously had much more expensive Arcam and Denon amps running through B&W speakers. In all honesty it sounds great. Its musical, rythmic and fast. I've been so pleased with is. Even streaming Spotify its still sounds CD quality. The remote was a little disappointing but I haven't really needed to use it because the app doea everything you need. I have a very eclectic music taste where everying thing from Fleetwood Macs Rumours to Cardi B's Up goes and it has yet to disappoint. I've seen a few reviews suggesting it doesn't deliver on musicality but I simply disagree. After barging for a discount, all in i paid 730 GBP and for this money i think its as good as systems I've spent 1500 on. If you are thinking of an all in one solution this is a real good option. Also have tv playing through it via optic and again, its great.

[@thestr8jacket1]

I have exactly the same set up with 3030i and a Project Debut Audiophile turntable, really pleased with it and running my tv sound through it for Sky and PlayStation also using the Optical connection. Really impressed with the auto switch on when sound detected and shut down after 20mins with no signal. And I control it all using my Sky remote 👍

[@otiv3554]

Can you change bass/treble settings on your Nad C338 with Nad remote app? Thanks

[@Nick-gm3ui]

@@otiv3554 This amp only has a bass boost (Bass EQ) facility. There are no incremental bass or treble settings. You can turn the Bass EQ on or off using the app in "Settings". Hope this is helpful!

[@otiv3554]

@@Nick-gm3ui Hmm I saw some screenshots online of Nad remote app and there is bass treble and mid eq settings, I guess they are there but not availble for Nad C338 amp? Maybe on some more expensive models its available? Thanks

[@dropthehammer1360]

I still have my 24 year old 314 integrated. I’m not using it at the moment but I have no plans of parting ways with it.

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

I see no reason to get rid of it. I almost bought a 320BEE off ebay for this review.

[@dropthehammer1360]

@@andrewrobinsonreviews what made you decide against it?

[@ross5518]

i dont know much about NAD integrated amplifiers but i just wanted to say that you make the best reviews ever.

[@Grampa-el3kz]

About 30 years ago I heard my first NAD integrated amp. I thought it was very nice and a bit dark (naturally the speakers may have had a similar effect), which I liked. I think it is nice they have kept their sound the same as in the past. Excellent review, thank you.

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

Thanks for watching!

[@mcsnoopster]

The discussion had become my favorite part by far.

[@83Goldy]

I’m agree.

[@Turbomike]

I like the remote because it fits the minimalistic, digital approach. One thing you should consider when you buy one of these is that the „Bass EQ“ function is useless. I tested the frequency response with LS 50 Metas. Without Bass EQ on, the bass starts audible at 20hz, even though not very loud. With Bass EQ turned on the bass is cut and starts to be audible from 39hz! And a lot more silent even after 39hz. Upper bass is boosted but you completely loose the range that makes you not need a subwoofer with speakers that have the potential to do that. If you dont use a subwoofer never turn Bass EQ on. Also there is no bluetooth security so your neighbour could connect to your NAD and destroy your speakers while you are not at home. Just take the left antenna off (Bluetooth). That will reduce the range to your room. Thanks for the great review. What microphone and post processing are you using? Sennheiser MKH 416? It is the best sounding KZbin channel I ever heard!

[@GINTER_K]

Protection is available. Hold down the play button for three seconds.

[@GarrettWilliams-RoadHustler]

I have a ancient NAD 3045 with beautiful VU meters and a 3225 PE love both of them.

[@joepop8122]

Almost bought an NAD integrated in 1987 when I bought my Yamaha receiver. I don’t remember the model number, but I remember it only spec’d at 20 watts per channel, and I didn’t buy the salesman’s assertion that it was NAD watts. I’ve learned some since.

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

Yeah, NAD hits a little different in the Watts department. Thanks for tuning in!

[@timothy9596]

I'm on the hunt for a new integrated amp and Andrew had me convinced this was the one. That was until he said there were no tone controls. That's a deal-breaker for me. Seriously, how freaking hard could it have been to add that simple feature?

[@rickbelknap]

Do you think that with the DAC that is included that there is no need for a external DAC such as a Schiit Modi 3?

[@TheTuckmon]

Great review. I love the out takes it adds humor at a time when people need to laugh.

[@yuckysamson]

First time we ever saw scanlines on the screen behind. Odd. Great review, btw.

[@emokidsparade8126]

i don’t have any experience with a class D amp, but i really like that this nad sounds good, runs cool, and is power efficient. i use an old receiver that gets hot after awhile of listening and i’m sure that doesn’t help with the energy bill. if the nad can help with that, i’m open to it as another option to consider over other AB integrated amps.

[@Adam-bv5kt]

I personally had issues with the NAD338. The Chromecast on occasion was very buggy. I wouldn't be able to pause or change songs (using spotify) and would have to reboot the amp. Sometimes twice. It didn't happen often but often enough for the price. I also found the sound to be a bit flat. Listening to music and lower volumes wasn't enjoyable. Had to really crank it up. Ended up exchanging for the Marantz NR1200.

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

Bass boost helps dynamics at lower volumes I found. But the 1200 is a great piece too.

[@lucapappalardo6956]

Still owning a NAD 3120, incredibly musical.

[@stephenjames3098]

I bought a 3120 new in the early 80's. I've had several "upgrade" replacement amps since, but none were actually better in the long run. The 3120 just sounds right. I recently had some switch and capacitor repairs done and am hopeful it will last another several decades. Phenomenal audio bargain. Running it with a Rega Planet 2000 CD player and KEF Coda 3 speakers with Cardas Cross cables. Magical.

[@davidwho7847]

Thank you for this review. I'm seriously considering the C368 as I love that design, power output range and user interface.

[@fstrati]

I have bought it for a great price. I can strongly recommend it

[@jkh4q]

Another good one, Andrew and Kristi. I didn't even know I wanted a NAD integrated until just a few moments ago. I might need to start reviewing audio equipment too just to help pay for all the stuff you make me want to buy.

[@joshuawarren9891]

For me, it was the NAD 3240PE. Now that had a fun volume control! One thing I have noticed, vs Cambridge Audio products, and indeed older NAD products as standard, is there is only one set of speaker posts. A slight turn off for me when I was mulling over a choice recently.

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

Not familiar with that model, but I'll google it.

[@joshuawarren9891]

@@andrewrobinsonreviews it had this thick ridge edged and then a balance switch inside the dial. Utterly pointless but a lovely design. I'm pretty sure it was a class H and said something like 40w into 8ohms, but this was also quoted as a 'minimum'! I think this might still be at my parents house... maybe time to dig it out and get a refurb...

[@mohamedahmed1023]

I like that you clarified that rolled off highs do NOT mean a lack of detail or transient response in the highs. Lots of viewers conflate the two so kudos on helping us with that.

[@BrianBrecker]

>great starter >$700 One of these things is not like the other

[@MichaelLivingston-me]

You do a great job, and I agree with others, your wife's input is valuable. Keep her in the mix up to her comfort level. If she doesn't mind being on camera, the two of you together would be good, IMHO.

[@markceci9896]

Like the NAD sound, but I have had terrible luck with reliability. 1 high power 7ch receiver and one 1980s stereo integrated. Both need repair. I will probably sell for parts.

[@randomtube8226]

I have the NAD C 268 2ch power amplifier. Adding a tube preamp with xlr interconnects helps quite a bit.

[@jlmain5777]

It’s interesting that NAD still has a foot in the class A/B world, but for the most part is producing class D with every new product. I’m not sure if a good comparison is a gasoline engine versus an electric car, but it certainly seems manufacturing is moving towards class D. Nice review. You were easily able to to describe the differences between the 328, 338, and 368.

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

I think as time moves on all amplifiers in the non ultra high-end space are going to be Class D or some variation thereof. Class D isn't the sonic kiss of death it once was, and the C338 is a great example of how far it has come. Thanks for watching!

[@winstonbroadway3763]

I owned several 2 speaker systems as well as a separate home theatre.. All entry level mostly but reasonably OK.. Better than these colossal muktispeaker setups and I'm purely audio anyway. ... I was given-yes.. Given!!.. A great condition nad C320BE in great condition... Damn!! Sounds amazing!! Truly great sound for a low power amp. I still have it 15 years later.. Many mates have made offers on it haha

[@nickeriksson]

My first amplifier (which I continue to use and haven't yet replaced/upgraded) is the NADC326BEE. It's an excellent integrated amp, and very affordable second-hand (cost me about £150 here in Devon, UK). Paired with Q Acoustics 2050i and a 3070S subwoofer, it has an excellent dynamic sound with an emphasis on the lower-end. I listen to it for hours everyday, and listen to vinyl, stream digital music and play games / watch films, and never find it tiring or fatiguing. I am sure I will upgrade one day, but I have a feeling that is still quite some time away!!

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

The 326 replaced the 320 if I'm not mistaken. Great amp!

[@nickeriksson]

@@andrewrobinsonreviews Thank you! Keep up the great work 👍

[@tess6499]

And is the C356bee worth the upgrade? I have also the c326bee. Thanks!

[@tess6499]

@@andrewrobinsonreviews and is it worth the upgrade to a C356bee? I have the c326bee. Thanks

[@Powerpickle68]

With each video, the more I like the discussions that you and Kristy have about the review product.

[@russfelger]

Great review, Andrew. To answer your question about newer or older, I have to go with the older class A/B, for a few reason. First- it's class D. 'nuff said. Second- The 338 is an integrated amp? NAD dropped the ball on that spec. No tone controls at all, so it appears it's an amp. Coming from the old(er) gen of class A/B, the 314, 317, and 319, have the same design principals, yet, have tone controls, and using Cerwin Vega VE-12's connected to any of the 3 mentioned, you don't need to turn the volume much at all to let the neighbors (across the street) know you're home. NAD had a unique approach to using tone control, in that, the bass and treble controls were not to affect the midrange at all. Leaving that section out of the 338, would seem to prove they still follow that standard. Having that section added to the 338, would solve that treble roll off and the shyness of the bass. I've been a fan of NAD for years, the bass is always detailed and full the highs clear but not shrill. If you get the chance to test drive the older class A/B series, give it a shot. They definitely leave an impression on you. Thanks.

[@aussierob7177]

Hi Andrew. Before i upgraded i was using the NAD C165BEE stereo preamplifier which sounded very nice. Then i changed to an Audiolab 8200Q. The sound difference was amazing.

[@christopherbrown8205]

Different how?

[@Johnny-lt5ib]

Hanging for the M33 review. I love your reviews and content!

[@MeminBIG]

Hello, I am Memo from Mexico, i always enjoy your reviews, but I enjoyed the conversation with I supposed is your wife the MOST! I'ts like a casual conversation with somebody who is not trying to be impresive. It feels honest and more familiar than almost all reviews you find on the web. I'm just starting my own system, and the first purchase I made is the NAD 368, I hope I can buy a good pair of speakers soon. I'm tryng to buy the KEF R3, do you think is a good pairing? should i better get de LS50 meta? Greetings

[@josexavierjr.5633]

Great review, Andrew. I really enjoyed the discussion section between you and Kristi. Came close to buying NAD a few months ago, but went with Parasound stuff instead, for the extra power. Nice to see NAD including the DAC and phono preamp, but no tone controls is a let down. Still, good value for the price.

[@mgrmln]

I also began my hifi journey with a NAD 320BEE!

[@seangray3730]

Have a C 368 BluOS-2i in my living room with Yamaha NS1000’s and it’s a great Roon endpoint and sonically a nice match.

[@georgecustanzza56]

I heard a McIntosh audio player/amplifier combo mated to Vandersteen towers like 8 years ago and right then and there I realized how crappy the gear I had was. lol

[@SeanVedell]

One of my first integrated amps just came back into my life today! Yamaha R-30 that got me through a few decades and then sat idle for a few more. Also retrieved my first good speakers, Paradigm 5se. A dusty pair but otherwise they look good. Time to hook it all up and see if my sonic memory stretches over 30 odd years.

[@bickert19]

I watched until the end but did not hear your thoughts on the NAD and the Wharfedale 12.4 you featured. I’m currently using a 316BEE V1 and am interested in the new Diamond 12 lineup! Thanks for a great video!

[@mbp2059]

Can you bring your accomplice into the frame when you do discussion? Always enjoy the conversation, but it's odd to only see one of you.

[@mbp2059]

It might help bring attention to the fact that ladies also enjoy this hobby!

[@stephenbrockway5899]

She doesn't feel comfortable in front of the camera. She does a lot of stuff behind the scenes. I respect that she does not want to be seen. I appreciate that she is comfortable voicing her opinion. Thank you Kristi.

[@mbp2059]

That's cool, just an idea. Love the videos. I've learned a lot about how to understand what makes audio sound good, and match my tastes. Very impressive channel!

[@speedwolf5212]

I’m surprised you guys haven’t reviewed the well loved NAD 316bee v2 yet.

[@danielbarrera6880]

Totally Underrated !!!!!!!!

[@thethirdman225]

@@danielbarrera6880 Not at all. I’d say it’s highly respected, certainly by anyone familiar with NAD. It tends to sneak in under the radar because it’s a pretty old model now and NAD have focused their attention more on amps like the C338.

[@enrage6073]

The best hifi I listened for the price is yet a pair of Sonos One connected in stereo. You need to have an iPhone to complete the configuration with their intuitive TruePlay equalizer but then you get the most incredibly well balanced sound possible and this deep tight bass sounds incredible. Limits are your only source will be your iPhone but for 400 $ you probably don’t get anything sounding better

[@zardoz2627]

Always liked NAD. Wish I never sold the 2 NAD PE2200's that I had. With the built in streaming this is definitely something I'd consider

[@ArunPaul-Malaysia]

NAD C338 would go well with Mordaunt Shorts M10i, POLK S20 or Klipsch RP-600M. You will get the scintillating highs.

[@davidgarza6339]

Its upsetting I haven't seen you do a review of Wharfedale Linton Heritage speakers, cause I want to buy them, and you is the guy who can convince me to get them lol. Love seeing your reviews, there's wholesomeness and so much detail in explaining. Thanks for your work! And thanks for saying it the proper way. The best sound system is the one you like. Or something like that. Thanks!

[@MWilson225]

Great review as always Andrew. I’m a huge fan of NAD products. I’m currently running a 316BEE 40W per channel on a set of 607 Bookshelf Speakers and the bass is phenomenal. I have version 1 of the 316 which includes bass and treble controls and has much better volume knob in my opinion. I also have the T758 V1 as my surround receiver which is also an amazing piece of equipment. Would to see more NAD on the channel! Perhaps an M10 Review. Keep up the great content my dude!

[@mikevalentinas6766]

I like that they included a throw-away remote because honestly I've never used a remote for any of my integrated amplifiers (unless it has a function you can't control on the unit itself. Peachtree has a bad habit of doing that with its tube, HT bypass and eq loop functions). It is of no value to me to have a fancy remote.

[@ElementEWFW]

Thanks for the review Side question what is the wallpaper app ur using on the tv behind?

[@laquintana8290]

Thanks! I looked at a number of integrated amps with my main criteria being streaming. I'd been familiar with the NAD name but never had any of their products. I decided to try the C368 BluOS. At first I was very disappointed in the bass response, but it took nearly a month for the amp to really open up. I am, however, driving a pair of power hungry Amphion Helium 2's with it, and the 80 watts still needs to be cranked to pick out details. The sound has become excellent and I agree that the soundstage is a bit compressed, especially compared to my Parasound/Paradigm combo in the loft. That soundstage envelopes the entire room :-)

[@martinwyatt3939]

I started my audio journey with a 3020 and have a soft spot for the brand. I’ve been revisiting the line up and the C338 has catch my attention. I was interested in it’s streaming and Bluetooth features and was excited when I saw that you had a review. Unfortunately I was disappointed that you had nothing about its streaming and Bluetooth features. 🙁

[@timo5601]

Same here! 3020 the first year it came out and a pair of B&W 110's, B&O Turntable

[@martinwyatt3939]

ADS L620 speaker and Philips 312 turntable

[@sunnybeachweddings7037]

I guess I am at the start of my audio journey. I had my NAD 3020 Series 20 for about a moth. Still looking for the perfect speaker match. Tried 4 different but open to try some more...

[@andrewrobinsonreviews]

@Martin Wyatt - The sound quality I describe in the video was arrived at by using Bluetooth, streaming music, as well as connecting analogue devices. The sonic character of this integrated is pretty constant across the board. You'll really notice differences in terms of soundstage and detail / focus based on your source but the tonality doesn't really change.

[@andrewm8831]

Integrateds at this price point would probably be better if they omitted the headphones section and maybe even the phone stage if customers really want those facilities they aren't that expensive to add at a later date

[@vivianokeswa488]

How is this one compared to Denon 600 NE in terms of sound? I’m trying to make a choice to buy

[@jmccullough975]

I’m not him but from the videos I’ve seen of him he doesn’t seem to like the Denon 600

[@vivianokeswa488]

@@jmccullough975 ooh I see. When I was listening to the 600 NE, it seem to have power but wasn’t smooth on the notes 🎶 . Seemed raw

[@jmccullough975]

@@vivianokeswa488 yeah I was thinking about buying it as well but I’m glad I shelved the money and found the Rotel a12