I'm not against or pro to this land bridge or canal project...but I've always find it amusing how the developed world's media (such as CNN and CNA), are always so passionate and caring about other's (mostly under developed countries) environmental preservation, while theirs are completely gone as a result of development years ago
@DBLARRY99911 ай бұрын
Of course they want all others countries never developed.
@alainoki580411 ай бұрын
This media is paid highly by west to cast negative values to asean countries...to stir up the region stability by the support of west and in collaboration with the local agent....
@alainoki580411 ай бұрын
This media is paid highly by west to cast negative values to asean countries...to stir up the region stability by the support of west and in collaboration with the local agent....
@thomaskim312811 ай бұрын
It is the Tanya Harding mentality: knee cap the competition.
@tokaitrading833511 ай бұрын
They are hypocrites wanted to dictate others
@lavista4u11 ай бұрын
Bangkok has the highest number of flyovers in the world 700+ and longest road bridge in the world 55+ km BangNa expressway. If any country could pull this off would be Thailand. Thailand is very big on infrastructure
@donkeykong516 Жыл бұрын
Singapore doesn’t want ship traffic to go to Thailand, it’s competition for Singapore who currently charges high port call price.
@gajaholeng440 Жыл бұрын
singapore is just jealous due to krai thailand will be new logistic international way
@sart3735 Жыл бұрын
@@gajaholeng440I heard about this land bridge since primary school and I am 50 this year. 😂. Sg is jealous. No we are laughing. So many neighboring countries hate us. Because Only winners are hated, no one hates losers. 😂
@LonganLee Жыл бұрын
Bo Bian one lah😅 singlish for No Choice, Surrender to reality
@Johnne009 Жыл бұрын
Singapore military is on high alert at the moment
@teytreet735811 ай бұрын
Not going to get any traffic
@KSMrK11 ай бұрын
Im a thai and Im very suspicious that few of these people are being influenced pursuaded or even paid by the NGOs related organisation.Such project is big Im sure Thai government will decide what is best for the country.
@Bententhailand11 ай бұрын
We should dig a canal not buid landbridge, I don't agree that this project will benefit for us.
@KSMrK11 ай бұрын
@@Bententhailand Im no expert Im just saying government should know best how to deal with this project..
@Bententhailand11 ай бұрын
@@KSMrK I'm not an expert either but I have been studied about those projects, that is why. 😄🙏
@tzd224511 ай бұрын
Singapore seems to undeniably too concern on this issue
@rudaldongfeng771810 ай бұрын
Too obvious just like the west, environment will be a good target. If it's not democracy, environment, or human rights abused.
@thingthangthong Жыл бұрын
The Mekong River is not Chinese. South China sea is not Chinese territory.
@kevhall4802 Жыл бұрын
Maybe not but the Mekong does originate in China and its flow is impeded by dams in China
@walkertongdee11 ай бұрын
South China sea...
@mrblurblur200311 ай бұрын
@thingthangthong You may be married but your wife is not really yours. You may eat and swallow rice but the rice is not really digested by you. You may own a car and drive on the highway but the highway is not yours.
The point is they have no idea whats best for them duh...
@cloudzero154710 ай бұрын
@@walkertongdee said the ignorant farang.
@walkertongdee10 ай бұрын
@@cloudzero1547 Foolish idea, what are they thinking? No one will want to unload and reload to a different ship, how does that work the timing logistics are very difficult and expensive. Its too costly, too much work, and it would take more time and bother. Build a CANAL duh.
@kamrulz65910 ай бұрын
This project hs a profound impact on msia economy.msia nor against or support this this project.in both cases msia gain the benefits.northern of msia will bustling with new ports being constructed to support the canal n if the project didnt take off msia hs already hs many new ports being constructed along southern coastline of msia.
Of course CNA would not support this. And it's not difficult to look for negative perception or effects. When the Suez canal was built likewise there were lots of uncertainties. And so is Panama canal. Guess the media can manoeuvre the discourse.
@staticoverplastic745611 ай бұрын
not sure if you've been following the news, panama and to a lesser extent suez are facing very real problems atm. does it mean the projects were not worth doing? no, i think we can agree in those 2 instances it was definitely worth it, but it's still worth weighing the cost/benefits, and the benefits in this case aren't as obvious (less shipping days saved). singapore benefits from the current sea route, but it's just one potential stop along a very long route, nothing is stopping neighbouring countries from building their own competitive ports without the massive cost/footprint of a land bridge (and in fact that's what they're already been doing with success). more than 1 way to skin a cat.
@liarliar341211 ай бұрын
It seems that Thailand wants to compete with Malaysia's ECRL project.
@kamrulz65910 ай бұрын
Ecrl of msia is a fine example of what is landbridge is all about.😊
I'm Thai and we will support this maga project for Thailand future growth and sustainable. CNA should to interview Thailand Government and listen the reason from the both side also Project Investors from Oversea.
@Wenshun-n7e Жыл бұрын
This project will definitely benefit Thailand as a whole..it's a very good positive opportunity.. I support the project even though I am not Thai.
@anuchit95569 ай бұрын
I am a Thai person from the area. I support this project.
@mikerwriter11 ай бұрын
Someone needs to explain how it will ever be quicker or easier to unload boats onto trucks and then reload on different boats after crossing the peninsula. This might work as a canal, but doesn’t seem beneficial to shipping as a land-bridge.
@mikerwriter11 ай бұрын
@@antalai4875There’s no piracy threat in the region. You’re thinking Yemen and Somalia.
@Hashpassion11 ай бұрын
@@mikerwriter no pirate? which caves are you coming from?
@limk899411 ай бұрын
With today's infra technology and China prowess. You will be surprised with the result details and efficiency in the coming. The HSR is one example. Some people needs more learning to do. 😆
@codybank96 Жыл бұрын
This land bridge is not even the most optimal choice for Thailand. The ships need to berth, unload cargo, load on to trucks/into the pipes, travel to the other port in Thailand, load onto the next vessel before moving off. There are so many things to consider and so much cost as well. Just to point out some potential problems, 1)cost of transporting on trucks 2)weather when travelling by truck(bulk cargo may be damaged by rain) 3)transporting of oil through pipes (Oil grade difference) 4)loading vessel late/no berthing spot for loading vessel. These are just some of the problems companies may face if they choose to go through land bridge. But i'd point out that if they had a canal that cut across instead of a land bridge, it would post a problem for Singapore. This land bridge would ultimately be, in my opinion, a waste of money.
@jamesleigh616611 ай бұрын
Its Thailand bro. "Projects" are used to Siphon off money.
@azlirazli750011 ай бұрын
A water canal cutting southern Thailand is not strategically wise in term of military perspective. As majority of thai southerners are Muslim, it will bring difficulties for Bangkok to maintain their iron grip. The Thais know this very well, thus the water canal is not an option.
@codybank9611 ай бұрын
@@azlirazli7500 yes, i understand this and that is why they never could build it. But im saying it would be more optimal for shipping if they could.
@azlirazli750011 ай бұрын
@@codybank96 the key for this land bridge to be success is efficiency. If they are efficient enough, let say they manage to save 'a day of operation' compare to normal route, it still significant enough for business communities especially in rush global trading.
@codybank9611 ай бұрын
@@azlirazli7500 sure, it provides option for the ships and their companies but there are more factors (and probably cost) at play to consider and, assuming if its, one day of operations saved is worth it. i think that's up to the companies.
@lekraththaphon202411 ай бұрын
“I am a Thai native. I just want to say that what you are trying to present doesn’t work and is unlikely to be effective. It’s 2024, a year where most people in the world can independently research information without relying on potentially biased media. Thank you for trying.”
@keffinsg Жыл бұрын
The official reasons for this project is just plain silly. It only takes 2 or 3 days to sail around Singapore. How much time does it take to unload a ship, transport it overland, then reload it again? I would save nothing, and probably cost more. There is another motive for pushing this project.
@talkinghand122 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, I know what this other motive is. And it's going to work either. Not with current modern technology.
@deschan2246 Жыл бұрын
Its not silly at all, it just u failed to see it. Ships on western Thailand off load their goods on Thailand western coast. Ships from receiving countries can pick up the goods in western Thailand. How silly can it be?
@Johnne009 Жыл бұрын
They're making a Suez canal, don't have to unload at all
@user-tl4ly1fk2p Жыл бұрын
@@Johnne009no canal but land route
@paulr.291911 ай бұрын
This is a faster way of crossing from west to east. Moreover the environment would be spared from damage if a canal is built.@@Johnne009
@albertwong191911 ай бұрын
Economies of scale, efficiency and fast turnaround well on paper the concept looks good but the logistics and coordination efforts required to achieve efficiency and fast turn around is needed but it is a start lets see if they can pull this off! Ideally cutting a canal similar to the Suez canal is the ideal solution but the engineering efforts and challenges posed is very high. I saw some trolls mentioned Singapore charges high fees for docking around Singapore, what an idiot lmao, Singapore similar to its airport charges a nominal fee they make it up with the traffic, refueling, logistics and other side charges. Anyways business is all about costs and efficiency lets see how the Thais can up the game here.
@davidonformosa Жыл бұрын
Apart from the environmental impact, I can't see how the land bridge would improve efficiency. Ships might save two days sailing time, but the time taken to unload cargo and move it across the peninsula would not be any faster.
@MrCHAI3311 ай бұрын
Easy to answer if Thailand has more ports better than no ports.
@samuraipainter30811 ай бұрын
They want to create more jobs
@samuraipainter30811 ай бұрын
They want to create more jobs
@samuraipainter30811 ай бұрын
They want to create more jobs
@samuraipainter30811 ай бұрын
They want to create more jobs
@teytreet735811 ай бұрын
Handling nightmare. No shipping company would use this. Dock, offload, train, wait to load, load. Yikes.
@MrCHAI3311 ай бұрын
Documentary is misleading that people are divided. Do you mean 100s of peoples vs the rest of thailand😂😂😂
@paulverdon4362 Жыл бұрын
how many ships can you load or unload at once? where do the others wait? like Singapore, 100 ships anchored off kho chang or Sumui? great idea
@veekwok5611 Жыл бұрын
The Tuas Mega Port is underway. It is not easy to challenge Singapore's resourcefulness. I am sure Singapore had calculated the possibility of Thailand building a land bridge or digging a canal across the Isthmus of Kra.
@keatkhamjornmeekanon761611 ай бұрын
Thai government has to choose between landbridge and eastern ecomonic corridor.
@deanwhitehead11 ай бұрын
KOH CHANG No electricity? Wrong. Fully wired electricity infrastructure. Few tourists? Wrong. Numerous B&Bs, hotels and resorts, including some 4-star resorts. On the Andaman Sea? Wrong. It sits on the Eastern side of the Gulf of Siam (Thailand); the Andaman Sea defines the West coast of the Western side of Thailand and Myanmar. Poor error checking.
@thanpisittadsri202711 ай бұрын
Hahaha as a Thai, I find the unsurpursing Singapore MEDIA's too deeply concerns kinda funny. But don't you worry. we will be able to diversify the supply chain therefore the geopolitical risk of ASEAN with both options as stablizing mechanisms with LB. It will be built this time bc this ain't a Canal and We won't steal the major ULCVs market share anyway. As them still use Sunda mainly to arrive Singapore.
@pijna11 ай бұрын
Singapore sponsored NGO to depict negativity of this project. Singapore has enjoyed its privilege so much until this project pops up.
@reamtevada76858 ай бұрын
The canal is much better than land bridge. People dont like to unload and reload the shipment
@pehclark7256 Жыл бұрын
China to Mediterranean FEU is now USD$5000 plus .... 🤣🤣🤣 cuttting 1.5 day shipping time doesn't cut it. When there is no demand for overproduction you know? For example how is Nepal airport air traffics part of the Belt and Road Ini.I mean Thailand won't mind owing China money to built redundant projects like the Laos Crashy railway or that incomplete highway unless....
@talkinghand122 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, when you look at the map, it's not far from Malacca straits. How many billions of dollars to build this? I just don't see it's going to happen. Just another dream project.
@kng573611 ай бұрын
Why does Singapore have to worry so much about this project? Toxic neighbors😢
@danielc27019 ай бұрын
It's just the news. The rest of Singapore don't really care much. Just because the news says people care does not really mean that people really care lol.
@krollpeter Жыл бұрын
I do not see how a multilane highway with a constant stream of heavy truck traffic would split the land lesser than a shipping channel.
@christopherlaw9184 Жыл бұрын
Well presented documentary. Good visuals and sequences 👍🏻
@Ravindrababu-c8l3 ай бұрын
In the excuse of environmental preservationof the southern province, development plans of Thailand land, canal and bridge constructions, cannot be stoped for they fecilitate smooth international maritime passage and land connectivity accelerate development to southern provice of south Thailand. Ofcourse, the hieght of the bridge can be raised and another canal can be commissioned late for two way maritime transport on the Isthamus of Kra in Thailand. India and Thailand govts can jointly undertake as they are mutually benefit and advantage to both countries.Sir. Thank you.
@cheemengsiew28811 ай бұрын
CNA On threat to Singapore as a port
@kevhall4802 Жыл бұрын
A long held pipe dream that should remain a dream It does not stack up economically from reports Multi handling cargo to truck it across Thailand? Seems very inefficient
@กฤษดาพรกลิ่นจันทร์11 ай бұрын
สิงคโปร์ออกอาการจังเลยครับ ฮา ฮา
@palmwang972511 ай бұрын
I think it's not necessary for SG.
@ksspider487811 ай бұрын
no non no😢😢😢
@amadishah11 ай бұрын
It is too late..shld be done 30 years ago
@HaziqRosli-d6vАй бұрын
No ships will use it even if it's built for one very simple reason - No insurance company would insure the cargo going through a conflict zone. 😂
@SomicGoodgamer11 ай бұрын
Mumble all you can SG la, These projects seem to concern you a lot huh? The projects will generate many benefits for local Thai people there. FYI Those people you interviewed are not registered as Thai Citizens. these people are immigrants from neighboring countries who live and work as cheap labor for the fishery industry. If you are so sure that this project doesn't seem to work, Why do you care about it?
@danielc27019 ай бұрын
We don't. It's just news pushing for views. The numbers just don't work out for any canal, it's a white elephant project.
@lostinmuzak Жыл бұрын
No. The project doesn’t make any sense financially or otherwise. Another Chinese funded mega project heading for mega failure just like so many in China and abroad. If Chinese economy doesn’t recover this project is not going anywhere.
@cosmoray9750 Жыл бұрын
I thought Thailand was going to built a canal similar to the Panama Canal
@arsenal_84 Жыл бұрын
@@cosmoray9750canal is too expensive for both Thailand and china to build. Hence they recommend roads and sea ports on both sides of Thailand.
I am uncertain what types of ship they propose to attract. Take container shipping for example; there is no way , no matter what magic is used; unless the flying carpets still dreamed of by some nations could be realized, there is no way to move thousands of containers across even across any distance could justify the costs incurred as against the cost of 2/3 days of sailing! The only option is a canal subject to the real costs to be involved. Even the century old Panama Canal is now encountering " dry season" impact; giving hope to the possibility of the Guatemala canal realization. Anyway, we can all wait for a decision.
@araara474611 ай бұрын
A land bridge divide: Southern Thailand's mega-project A land bridge ACROSS: Southern Thailand's mega-project
@WowLuvya6 ай бұрын
Bad effing idea for tourism in the Andaman for Thailand. Every mega project affects WATER QUALITY.
@วังน้ําเขียว-ฏ6ป11 ай бұрын
How much you are salary per months? There are very poor not salary ... Are you know about that? Non - education , Non - healthcare , Non-money. Good life! No, 1000 year ago, You are never seen them before.. and will you go back for travel or take anything at that place again?... No way, That's be true.
@ericphua23596 ай бұрын
No, I do not know what you are talking about. Write in your native language. We can use Google translation.
@วังน้ําเขียว-ฏ6ป6 ай бұрын
@@ericphua2359 You're don't understand because of you don't want to Understand.. easy easy..
@walkertongdee11 ай бұрын
Foolish idea, what are they thinking? No one will want to unload and reload to a different ship, how does that work the timing logistics are very difficult and expensive. Its too costly, too much work, and it would take more time and bother. Build a CANAL duh.
@RUHappyATM11 ай бұрын
I don't think a land bridge will work. A canal, maybe.
@scorpio6524811 ай бұрын
If the canal were build this area will improve the livelihood if the people ,, it is better to embrace the positive changes rather than oppose and stay poor.
@kahhowong341711 ай бұрын
The Kra Isthmus canal is a far better and in the long term, "green solution"
@jb5music6 ай бұрын
"Land bridge" concept is a boondoggle. How ridiculous you'd have to still unload the ships and reload different ships on the other side. If you were going to go to all the trouble to do that you would just build a canal. "Land bridge" is just a grossly dysfunctional project floated by special interests. Stop showing us "Land bridge" KZbin videos.
@deanzaZZR11 ай бұрын
Not one mention of China which surprises me. Of course China sees such infrastructure as a strategic asset with a (mostly) friendly Thai government.
@pongkornprasopsukchokmanee921111 ай бұрын
The project will destroy our mother-nature
@sarabeth805011 ай бұрын
Quite frankly, this project is unnecessary. Why? Climate change is now irreversible and the fastest heating region is in the Arctic. Thus, the far shorter/cheaper route through the Arctic will be routine in the coming years. There will be zero reason for shipping to go through South East Asia.
@ksspider487811 ай бұрын
our agricultural land , no project , no no no
@tanchye1720 Жыл бұрын
Destroying their beaches and fishing communities and finally it cannot challenge Singapore fully AI Tuas Port. Frequent flooding here and containers port are multi-facets, not just simply loading &?un-loading.
@Syangdan1366 ай бұрын
I'm not a Thai I'm Nepali i see in this video I'm very surprised Refugee gives advised to Thai Government if they do this activity in Nepal we kick out from our land 😂
@cirihime9479 Жыл бұрын
Seeing dynamic power shift between royalist and Pheu Thai coalition,Thai Pm wont last once senator elections soon.
@numsiskit23 күн бұрын
Don't do it, Shinawatra. Your islands are far more valuable in the long term than a shipping route. And the geopolitical risk is far too great. This wont develop the right kind of tourism, guy. You dont want cruise ships. You want travellers who will disperse across the water and land and explore amd support businesses everywhere, not just near the ports. As a Westerner, I say Thailand would be ruined if cruise ships take over
@promjadsadarthongyuruen146011 ай бұрын
ได้ไม่คุ้มเสีย ถ้าลองศึกษาดีๆ
@FifthGate10 ай бұрын
Singapore is already an IMF Advanced Economy. Let Thailand have the chance to escape the Middle Income Trap and become one, too.
Many projects development and environment possible can stand to the same side depends on management resources
@glumour308111 ай бұрын
😂😂 I really feel sorry for the people around the Suez and Panama Canals.....
@Hashpassion11 ай бұрын
too many misinformation
@liarliar3412 Жыл бұрын
China has plans for so many economic corridors with friendly countries.
@tl1533 Жыл бұрын
Ha ha ha
@angelosupsup3726 Жыл бұрын
If you were good to Philippines before maybe I would change your future, but you bully us too... Thailand economy won't grow that much cos Thai constitution should be replace or else stay at critical conditions even you have this land bridge project. When I was in Thailand I received a lot of god messages before before things change my life.
@talkinghand122 Жыл бұрын
Does it make economic sense to build this mega project, given the current economic environment? Usually mega projects are built to increase more growth when economy is going gang buster. All I see now is locals desperate for jobs. The project makes sense if it just helps local economy. Beyond that it doesn’t make sense.
@s.chaisrisuk495611 ай бұрын
Mediacrop? Bad news.
@Mikomido511 ай бұрын
I just hope Thailand gives priority to its’ environment and protects it from overcommercialism.
@Few_politicians_run_your_life11 ай бұрын
It will bankrup Thailand for sure. I want to see it. Who in the right mind willing to pay to download and upload plus insure cost if moving goods?
@ajaxpp5 Жыл бұрын
It's necessary if a country doesn't have USD. and is an enemy of USA because SG is an employee of USA.
@samuelrizal10008 ай бұрын
Just agree that there must be alternatives to stolen land monopolies for transportation. Too much time has passed for this tiny nation to manage its revenue to itself.
@bigerlike195911 ай бұрын
I’ m Thai yours support to landbirdg it will change Thailand development rich than Singapore now anywhere is shock of consolation 555. It is time change port use Thailand port future now.
@MNAinYYC11 ай бұрын
IF and when this project take off, Singapore will be the biggest loser. So you can imagine their deep and strong concern…
@danielc27019 ай бұрын
It's fake. I'm not sure who is stoking up the Thais, maybe the government trying to promise the people a better future but a canal can't deliver it. You can go look these things up, don't take my word for it. 1- it only takes 14 hours to transit the straits of malacca. At best, a canal can only save 14 hours, maybe 28 if a ship needs to double back to Vietnam or Thai ports. That is very little time saved. 2- traffic through a canal is very low, like 50-60 ships a day. You can check this with the Suez or Panama canal statistics. The straits of singapore has 2,000 ships estimated passing through it daily. 60/2000 = 3%. At best, it can only take away 3% of singapore's business. "Singapore black ops!!" is not something on the singapore side, it's from the Thais trying to find reasons why their government is not rushing into a losing business that they cannot see is a scam.
This mega kra project will backfire to Thailand. At least all the fanatic Muslim in southern Thailand will be very happy to join their brother in arms in southern Thailand. Good luck to Thailand.
@caiby4811 ай бұрын
I think that against the nature is better not to carry out. The big plot of their own land should never be cut into two pieces for possible economic purposes. There are nature purposes for one piece land of any countries to be as such, and should not be divided into an island or two pieces from one plot.
@LonganLee Жыл бұрын
Thailand should learn to say Bo Bian a term commonly used in Singapore🤣🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️ SGrens should also just say , " Bo Bian one mah😅"
@razif9211 ай бұрын
I can sense Singapore Government really nervous about this…😂😂😂
@nazrisaat789 ай бұрын
Malaysia will support this canal project
@jparsit9 ай бұрын
SG makes billions from the seaport. Like the US, afraid of China's progress, SG does not want competitors. Landbidge is a bad idea, the canal is better, but China lost interest in it.
@paulthoded7 ай бұрын
Really not all that informative
@jackielee459911 ай бұрын
I am wondering is there any investors ? He went to China,US and Japan so far only 'hi bye'
@findtheracingline9 ай бұрын
Singapore is naturally nervous about such a project. 😅
@jacqueopaolo570711 ай бұрын
Won't Happen.
@toonarmy985511 ай бұрын
haha, this is threat you sg ?. and it not your business.
@daviddd515 ай бұрын
Biased article
@husinshahid4911 ай бұрын
Thailand if you want to built go ahead ,why would you have to consider about Singapore 's concern,only you fit to think about your problem.NGOs defying work for other nation,just forget them.
@odinfinn577511 ай бұрын
แสดงว่าคนท้องถิ่น มีความรู้น้อยมาก
@angelosupsup3726 Жыл бұрын
I told you Singapore of your future, this project will serve drought for Singapore. I told yah I saw the future ahead.
@EthanTan-ow9tj Жыл бұрын
Lol
@zack.111 Жыл бұрын
It will affect but not drought the country because its maritime sector only contributes 7% of the country's GDP.
@angelosupsup3726 Жыл бұрын
@@zack.111 things change accordingly, even climate has changed. Remember Singapore are capitalism country, these billionaires can run away faster as jets.
@EthanTan-ow9tj Жыл бұрын
@@angelosupsup3726 so naive
@kwpf Жыл бұрын
Ignorance is dangerous.
@jrukawa1111 ай бұрын
Can throw in a Disneyland too?
@vanwangye10 ай бұрын
To be objective..Thailand government also fairly mentioned in Voice of America. They reject the canal idea as they have future plan to built roadways linking Thailand all the way to Malaysia and Singapore. Now the project is in battle on China CCP sponsorship or American private companies like Amazon for sponsorship.
@jeanlucc993 ай бұрын
singapore afraid they're going to be singapoor because of this
@fina811711 ай бұрын
They built tons of projects but still people are poor and live in a bad condition I don’t understand why this politicians always say it will contribute to the people instead of new mega projects they should help their own people. Invest in people
@jimmylam984611 ай бұрын
Eventually Thai would settle for a mega canal and the rest is smoke screens ! China gets the biggest piece of pie.......Singapore becomes Sing-a-poor !
@tonythvch350011 ай бұрын
Thailand’s political instability and corruption will cause this project to go over budget and stall its estimated completion date. They will face more headaches and maybe even financial collapse before they’ll see the results they’re hoping for. Regardless, Singapore will keep its hegemony on the regional logistics after this land bridge is built, they’re not stupid enough to let it slip away.
@alechiodakat90577 ай бұрын
Sure tourists will flock to a huge container port and massive oil terminal. Gee it's in my bucket list. That's why I go to Phuket for holidays instead of Singapore 😅😅😅