A Little Disappointed...But Still Good | Dehancer Film Emulation

Рет қаралды 4,374

Michael Hartman

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 21

@isaacapon 11 күн бұрын

I mean idk why you had to flex and make the intro a movie, but you do you!

@mahartman 11 күн бұрын

Had to do it in order to prove to Netflix that the BMPCC6K Pro deserves to be on the approved camera list!

@collinausbury 11 күн бұрын

My body is ready for your Filmbox review

@mahartman 10 күн бұрын

Thank you dude! I may consider it 🥸

@sanadakhumanthem3557 9 күн бұрын

@@mahartman Waiting for filmbox workflow😊

@northparkfilms3045 3 күн бұрын

great video very informative

@mahartman Күн бұрын

Thank you!

@guidedvisionsmedia 8 күн бұрын

Hey man I don’t feel this was a fair comparison of dehancer at all because it was not used correctly. You kinda pointed out your mistake in the comparison section by having both a print and an emulation on a the same time. I feel you would have got results you enjoyed if you white balanced your footage and didn’t use an “additional look” by having the film emulation on. That’s the whole point of the film head section. It’s a more technical white balance. I keep an empty node or two before my dehancer node so I feed the plugin with what im comfortable with as a base before using dehancer to create my “look”. filmbox is amazing just for not the $1000 price tag. I have used both and I think filmbox does 16mm better than dehancer as well as set up for a Davinci color managed workflow, a great plug-in but not necessarily for those that aren’t getting paid to color projects yet.

@mahartman 8 күн бұрын

@@guidedvisionsmedia appreciate the second comment. White balancing can make or break a look. Though, per Dehancer’s note on their site and many articles, the color head is better used for creative interpretation in developing a look. But you can use it for white balancing. Just way harder in my opinion and theirs. In most film emulation pipelines, a film stock AND print film are used at the same time. Most every commercial or narrative grade has a 2383 look at the end of the pipeline. Filmbox and Dehancer are unique because they give you the option of starting with a negative film stock as if you were shooting on it. It’s not a mistake to have both on at the same time. Very intentional. Dehancer’s negative motion picture stocks just didn’t look great to me. I think filmbox is incredible and I also think Dehancer is pretty neat too. Both are worth what you pay for and give you some sick options!

@guidedvisionsmedia 8 күн бұрын

You missed the linear option on film print bro, it’s great for those that don’t need a curve adjustment applied but still want to keep the film colors applied in the box above

@mahartman 8 күн бұрын

In my testing, it did not seem very clear what the use case of "linear" was. It's the same as leaving the "print film" option turned off. I suppose if you wanted to adjust contrast, exposure, and color density particularly you could do so. Though throughout the plugin there are other ways to do this. I am glad you find it useful and have a workflow. That's what Dehancer is all about. I think 99% of the time, Kodak 2383 is a base at the end of my pipeline, so if "print film" is on, its on 2383.

@mailais3403 12 күн бұрын

Can't you just use filmbox for the emulation and also dehancer for bloom/grain/compression at the same time lol. i feel like that would be the ultimate film look

@mahartman 12 күн бұрын

That’s basically what I did for the talking head portion of this video, except it was filmbox + dehancers compression. It’s one expensive look, but it’s, in my opinion, solid!