A reply against Yasser AlQadi claim that invoking the dead is not shirk P1

A reply to Yasser Al-Qadi’s allegaion that invoking the dead is not shirk unless it is accompanied by a belief that the one invoked is God
Wait soon for the release of the second part
Support me on patreon : / dimashqiah
www.sheikhdimashqiah.com

[@zakaria87100]

coming fro ma sufi backround (hamdullilah no anymore), the number 1 thing muslims should teach is shahada, the first pilar, it isnt something to say and not care about anymore, what does it mean there is no God but Allah, what is tawheed, claiming it, but at the same time asking blessings from the dead, from "saints" is okay? its madness, its arab pagans did, they believed in Allah, but wouldnt stop worshiping idols of their "saints", it leads to countless fitnahs, and i hope this ummah wakes up, and unite upon true tawheed.

[@inongbalee3092]

Not every sufi did that

[@zccau2316]

@@inongbalee3092 It was actually early hanbalis who were the worst

[@inongbalee3092]

@@zccau2316 I'm syafii not hambali ,but yes sufism exist in syafii school..and yes I'm not gonna lie some did that but not all of them ...and in whole sufism also not all of them doing gravewhorshiper

[@solsak836]

Noone worships saints. Worship is a big word, reserved for God.

[@zakaria87100]

@@solsak836 dua is worship

[@mohammadamanghauri]

May Allah grant you all the success and increase you in rank

[@busufyan]

جزاك اللّه خيرا يا استاذ I've listened to your lectures for years. It was very helpful when my family was leaving Shiaism. And, still is today with modern fitan. بارك اللّه فيكم

[@has0ais]

بارك الله فيكم شيخنا..... إخوانكم من إثيوبية

[@AB-xx7hy]

‎جزاك الله خيرا I was waiting for a refutation on this, sheikh. May Allah reward you and preserve you.

[@zccau2316]

Why are you waiting for refutations? No doubt YQ is on some messed up thing but Is that what gets you excited? Seeing another scholar make mistakes. What have we come to in this world? You should make dua for him to be guided back to the straight path rather then wait for refutations

[@AB-xx7hy]

@@zccau2316 i think you’ve misunderstood. I’ve put a comma in now so it’s better. I wanted a refutation on invoking other than allah not because it’s YQ. I would be very happy if YQ left his deviancy and returned to manhaj of salaf. May Allah guide him and us.

[@zccau2316]

@@AB-xx7hy In sha Allah and thank you for clarifying. The problem is I see too many brothers latching on and getting excited and waiting to pounce for each mistake of his rather than making sincere dua for him. It is like they get happy for every stupidy he does, as it adds to the ego of them being right and him being wrong, rather than doing what we supposed to in Islam, make dua for Allah to guide him back and act in dignity.

[@abdulgafoora6073]

@@zccau2316 May Allah keep us all on the Straight Path and Increase us in guidance.. Ameen..

[@AB-xx7hy]

@@zccau2316 no problem. I’ve noticed this problem as well. Too many people get happy over people’s mistakes and misguidance online. We should always ask Allah for guidance for ourselves and others.

[@iimiboy]

Jazakallah khair sheikh, miss your videos, been watching you for many years

[@AshrafAli-is4wv]

Why people ask the dead anyway? Quran mentioned many times you can not make the dead hear unless if Allah wills

[@shadowwhowalk]

There is a difference of opinion amongst scholars on how often the dead can hear the living, which created Shubha.

[@solsak836]

The souls of the dead are more free, especially the pious souls. They may be able to assist in their own way from the barzakh

[@AshrafAli-is4wv]

@@solsak836 their soul is free, but where did u find they can interact with us? And how do u know about souls when Allah said only little knowledge was given and its affairs with Allah only

[@solsak836]

@@AshrafAli-is4wv there are ahadith that indicate that sahaba have come in dreams after death to other sahaba to give them certain information about their belongings that they should give to such and such a person. Yes, we don't know about the reality of souls but we can know what they can do.

[@jagenaught]

@@solsak836 You're upon shirk. Where is the hadith? The dead can't help you. Sufis and Shia claim this false principles.

[@ebrahimadan3630]

MashaAllah Jazaakallahu khayr

[@nawazishkhan5831]

Assalamualaikum, thank you for this clarification and rebuttal

[@HussainFahmy]

*_Sadly resulting from a PHD (Permanent Head Damage) from Yale._*

[@shafiullahnoory6761]

:D

[@Kakeshii]

Western academia is dangerous and should be separated.

[@munaali2129]

You jump to criticize him, have some knowledge first!!!

[@Alwadie07]

بارك الله فيكم

[@azomasarani7670]

جزاك الله خيراً

[@elhadjiwathie7962]

It's crucial ! May Allah safeguard you, yaa Sheikh.

[@maryamyasin1616]

Best reply I’ve seen so far Allahuma Baarik. Jazakumullah Khair Sheikh; I can tell it took a lot of patience to watch YQ's long and boring answers. May Allah reward you with the best in this dunya and the next life. BarakAllah Feekum!

[@shafiullahnoory6761]

if you dont want to get misguided, dont listen to him and his likes doesnt matter what. their words are sugarcoated poison.

[@abdulmunim318]

I agree. Especially the example he used at the end of the video. Just because you don't believe the person your invoking is Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ doesn't give anyone the right to associate ibadah and give it to someone other than Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ. This is just basic Aqeedah.

[@user-je8nh3js6x]

فتح الله لك ابواب الخير الوفير

[@omartechnique6090]

Jazak Allah khair ustadh. We miss you in Ashton

[@atravellerindunya4433]

May Allah bless you with good health and long life shaykh.

[@stepstojannah8173]

Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal Rahimahullāh said: “People need politeness and kindness, and enjoining what is good without harshness, except a man who does evil openly, who must be told and stopped "harshly” [Al-Adaab al-Shar’iyyah (1/191) by Ibn Muflih] جزاك الله خيرا

[@amabdullah9678]

Slandering is Haram in Islam. If we follow your argument then the Wahabis also make Bidda and Shirk, does that mean the Ullama of Ahl Sunnah can demonize and spread hatred against the Wahabis? You get what you give!

[@stepstojannah8173]

@@amabdullah9678 Oh so you know better than imam Ahmed the great scholar May Allah guide you

[@spawnnpwn4166]

@@amabdullah9678 Emotional argumentation is your basis of aqeedah. Alhamdulillah the people of Hadith are free from the misguidance of Ahlul Bid'ah.

[@juliankelley6253]

Assolamolaykum, I personally don’t believe brother Yasir is an Islamic Scholar. He is more of a secular scholar who has studied Islam and then uses western academics as his yard stick when answering questions. Allah the Majestic has made very clear what shirk is in the Quran. May Allah guide us and save us from being misguided, ameen.

[@a.a7258]

And you believe in this guy who admitted he did homosexaul acts?

[@shadowwhowalk]

Yasir cited western academics, and not Islamic scholars, during the lecture? Where? Calling others than Allah is Shirk [if...] The 'if' part actually doesn't have clear or explicit statements.

[@AbdulLatif-ob5ju]

@@a.a7258 He was a teenager at the time right? And it was some 50 years ago. You never heard of Tawbah? Is Islam all about reminding someone of a sin they committed half a century ago?

[@user-dl5ln3wd6f]

@@a.a7258 That never happened, it was just an accusation by some liars.

[@abdul-hadidadkhah1459]

Yasir Qadhi comes from a society where saying "I don't know" or not praising oneself is seen as weakness. I'm talking about America. I feel he has adopted a little too much of that culture and forgotten how the early scholars used to be. May Allah guide him.

[@professorshrimp5187]

I know, which is ironic. Since "I don't know" is an atheist's favourite phrase.

[@abdul-hadidadkhah1459]

@@professorshrimp5187 atheists say they don't know yet say we come from space dust and believe in aliens with zero proof. They're walking contradictions.

[@professorshrimp5187]

@@abdul-hadidadkhah1459 exactly lol.

[@user-rp4gi6wi3r]

He didn’t forget how the earlier scholars were, he completely discredits them and says that their stuff is medieval. May Allah guide him and us, ameen

[@abdul-hadidadkhah1459]

@@user-rp4gi6wi3r yeah as far as I know he never said that regarding their rulings on usool ud deen/figh/agheeda, that was him commenting on things like their observations on mermaids etc. Allahualim.

[@abdihaji8984]

Christians actually pray directly mariama, mother of prophet isa peace be upon him, when they are in trouble, especially orthodox christians like russians.

[@amabdullah9678]

The Wahabis also worship idols like the Arabs of Jahilia time, they think God has leg, face, hands and so forth.

[@temasek65]

Beautiful snow ❄️!!

[@timash5968]

Beautiful background MashAllah 😊

[@JesusIstMuslim]

jzkAllah khair

[@ibnamanot]

Aameen. Needs more research among his deep research. On point.

[@user-tg5wf7pp7p]

can you give me that source please my brother

[@ishrakalvi4446]

Sheikh yasir didnt allow someone to go and invoke saints..... What he said was if someone invoke saints believing that the saint himself is deity, then it is absolute shirk and haram....but if someone doesn’t consider the saint any creator but believes that the creator has given the saint some power,so calling upon him According to sheikh yasir is haram and evil but not necessarily shirk.......Don't judge someone by watching some 2 or 3 minute clip...... I suggest everyone to yq's entire lecture..... May Allah guide us all

[@rayhan382]

the latter is also shirk

[@yaseen99]

What YQ holds has been refuted along time ago by Shaykh Sultan Al'Umayri in his book تحقيق مفهوم العبادة where we brings all the opinions of both sides and discusses it.

[@Adrian-yf1zg]

Mohamed abdulnwahab slaughtered muslims based on this ideology

[@xenomorphisisdilage472]

@@Adrian-yf1zg Proof that it was actually him, else it’s slander.

[@Adrian-yf1zg]

@Bzy go read history books, it's even documented in the books by his own followers

[@Adrian-yf1zg]

@@xenomorphisisdilage472 read the books from his own followers. He was basically same ideaology as ISIS. They copied his way and use his works to justify blowing up tombs and taking slaves

[@solsak836]

@Bzy pay him to spend time to bring the evidence

[@mysticminority9060]

Can someone link me the video where yasir qahdi said this?

[@mysticminority9060]

Here you go guys, found it.

[@zccau2316]

@@mysticminority9060 where is it

[@selima1057]

Check on KZbin yasir qadir invoking the dead shirk

[@bigk140bigk4]

I wouldn’t be surprised if yasar qadhi becomes a ashari In the next few years. The guy has lost the plot

[@ConsiderThis12]

@@jorgegif2570 Hahaha so true

[@mohamedmo8128]

@Abdul Haqq Personally my main problem with Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab is how close he got to the House of Saud, when he knew that the early scholars like Imam Ahmed Ibn Hanbal cursed the scholars who get too close to the Kings. Imam Ahmed literally called them dirty.

[@mohamedmo8128]

@Abdul Haqq Well I'm not a scholar, I'm just narrating what Imam Ahmed says. Imam Ahmed actually forbade his students from even writing to the Abbasid Caliphs. He felt so strongly about this. Shaykh Ibn Abdel Wahab however went further than writing he clearly allied himself to the ruling family and even married one of his daughters to Muhammad Ibn Saud.

[@user-yq2if6ld9h]

@@mohamedmo8128 show me where the imam forbade such a thing.

[@mohamedomar5642]

You would be surprised a lot of scholars such as imam Nawawi, ibd Hajar Alasaqalani, many of the shafi scholars were Ashari and not to forget salah udeen alyuubi were Ashari

[@adnaanali1889]

Is there a bit missing at 9:40 when Ibrahim said...

[@aali6216]

Sufi vs selfi both 👍welcome to intolerance

[@abidjalil4241]

Haqq Always Prevailing... "Al-Anbiya 21:18 Rather, We dash the TRUTH upon falsehood, and it destroys it, and thereupon it departs. And for you is destruction from that which you describe."

[@QnA513]

Huq and baatil is Hadith ALTHAQALAYN You know this hadith?

[@aboodia4315]

AsalamuAlikum, Jazzaka-Allahu Khirran!

[@Stephanieevison8739]

He blocked me after I debunked him in his page on Facebook ..he is translating the Holy Qur'an by his own.

[@yigittutenkuken1210]

Assalamu aleykum verahmetullahi wabarakatu!!

[@Muhiz23]

Subhanallah, yesterday I was just watching old videos of you in speaker’s corner with Sh. Abdurrahman green. I’m happy to see you doing well!

[@iimiboy]

I used to watch them years ago, the sheikh had bodyguards 😁

[@Muhiz23]

@@iimiboy bro, I just discovered him yesterday. I guess he’s a Dawah veteran. There’s a video on digital minbar that shows all of them doing Dawah with a young mansuur and even bilal philips

[@iimiboy]

@@Muhiz23 yea I've watched them all, this sheikh is legit, I asked my sheikh about him and he has a lot of respect for him and knows him well, all the people on haqq know sheikh dimashqiah

[@iimiboy]

@@Muhiz23 watch mansoor and hashim at 8pm on their channel dawawise

[@Muhiz23]

@@iimiboy yeah, Im interested to know who the special guest is. Imagine if they pull of a bilal philips or dr zakir naik!

[@mopoweruponlyup5032]

احسنت يا تاج راسي...متابعكم من المكسيك

[@nawazishkhan5831]

Mashallah jazakallah khair

[@nawazishkhan2080]

Assalamu alaikum, MASHAALLAH JAZAKALLAH KHAIR,I'm REALLY very thankful to you sheikh for taking this fitna of Yasir qadhi head on

[@myasesaleh4631]

Where’s your other channel

[@AshfakRazak]

من شر الوسواس الخناس الذي يوسوس في صدور الناس He's being tested with the religion. May Allah protect all Muslims from misguidance and show us the straight path. Salaam

[@islamforall437]

We all make mistakes. And I believe that Muslims should correct one another without calling each other names. Remind Dr Yasir Qadhi that ALLAH forgives All sin and HE loves to forgive Even shirk. So let us be gentle and kind to each other. We are all Muslim and we worship ALLAH alone. And this should be enough for us to forgive each other and move on from our mistakes of the tongue

[@aminuaidara8601]

Understanding u I also benefited a lot from Yasir qadhi lectures but I believe most of if not all this Muslim Scholars after the mistake he is making they have tried their best to advise him private but is not working and it is their responsibility by Allah to let the Muslim's world especially in the West to know what is going on with Yasir qadhi and some Muslims Scholars who believe there is a room for change in the book of Allah the Holy Quran

[@abdallahduker9184]

Yaahaafaazaak'Allah ya scheikh. Your loyal subscriber.

[@mohamedkhan7096]

I dont know why the merciful servant and other channel have him(YQ) lecturing on it.

[@abukhaledbarahma7949]

جزاك الله خيرا

[@farison2941]

yesterday he had live lecture specifically about why he left that salaf movement and belittling and criticizing the Najdi movement. as mentioned here he should have just believed whatever moment he wants but is he talking about it on his channel and warn people of those movements and its danger and prais - himself over and over. strangely he compared A Hadiths of prophet pbuh which he was a living prophet and asked for the charity in the cause of Allah Swt a well known Hadith to his claim that invoking the dead is not shirk. the hadith im giving the summary. that when prophet pbuh asked for charity in the cause of Allah then Abu bakar and Umar pbu them try to compete to give more charity in cause of Allah swt at the same time to please prophet pbuh. so he said that abu bakar and Umar knew that the charity is for the sake of Allah swt but also wanted to please the prophet pbuh at the same time knowing that the charity is not for the prophet pbuh its for Allah only so that can't be called shirk if it was to please prophet pbuh not for Allah just showing of to the prophet pbuh then it was shirk. so he said that exactly mushrikeen were worshiping the dead/idols in that way. it was so bizarre lecture a lot of people will see and there will be a lot of refutation. Y Q is Jahil scholar may allah guide him back to the true way of salaf saliheen inshallah.

[@HealMyTajweed]

Salaam. Its Asheeq from HealMyTajweed, I will also send you a more formal request through email Insha Allah. I would like to request permission under fair use and use part of this video in an upcoming compilation to be posted back onto KZbin, with all credits given to your video and/or channel in the description and cards wherever applicable. This doesn’t mean I will personally endorse every opinion that you post either by yourself or others through your platform. If you need more information, please get in touch Insha Allah. If I have already requested your permission and it has been granted, please ignore this message as I am sending a bulk message to all concerned. However I would prefer a written confirmation Insha Allah. Wasalaam

[@alalnajjar2187]

َQ: Who is Yassir compared to true scholars like M.Bin Abdulwahab (R Allah)? A: Nothing فَلا تَدْعُوا مَعَ اللَّهِ أَحَدًا How can someone invoke the dead and ignore the creator of the dead who never dies? SubhanAllah!

[@Dani-lk3ed]

It's okk to use prophet Muhammad name as intercession but I don't know if we can do intercession with awliya , bcoz there are narrations where sahabas were go to prophet grave and ask prophet to make dua to help in famine .

[@anthophilax]

@@Dani-lk3ed And do not pursue that of which you have no knowledge. Indeed, the hearing, the sight and the heart - about all those [one] will be questioned. (Quran, 17:36)

[@Dani-lk3ed]

@@anthophilax bro, I don't agree that we can ask the dead directly , but there are narrations where sahabas used to go to prophets grave to ask prophet to make dua to Allah to help them, this concept may be exclusive to prophets only bcoz they are alive in their graves ,but yes I don't support intercession with awliyas. I personally don't do any bcoz it's risky but still we need debate on this topic between prominent scholars of both side face to face and not refution

[@anthophilax]

@@Dani-lk3ed Brother, there is no debate in this topic. Scholars have agreed on this.

[@abdul-hadidadkhah1459]

Abdul Wahab was a khawarij, neither are on siratul mustaqeem.

[@drgalibhussain]

The problem with the people of this ilk is that they don't understand the nuances of death, Alame duniya, Alame barzakh, and Alame akhirath. No Muslim worth his/ her salt and having true belief in Tawhid will ask anything from Abdul Khader Jeelani,Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti, or other saints. They give wasila of their sainthood to Allah for making dua to Allah to Allah.Wali Allah is a concept authenticated by the Holy Quran and the Sunnah.We ask a living person to pray for us to Allah- any need, for instance good health. The people in Alame Barzakh are not dead please. They are very much alive as pointed out by the Holy Quran . Requesting these Muslims to pray to Allah for our worldly or Akhirath needs is neither shirk nor haram ,nor does it lead to shirk. The problem with Salafi scholarship is that they don't experience Alame Barzakh. Islamic faith is the faith of democracy: every Muslim according to his/ her capacity and potential ask saints to pray to Allah for need satisfaction and gratification. Salafi Ulemas contention that it's my way is the only high way smacks of authoritarianism of the highest order. May I request them to change their attitude and appreciate different view points of sincere intellectually honest scholars. Let's us unite and not divide the Muslim Ummah.

[@MinMin-ng7rr]

Sheikh Nurjan Mirahmadi can answer to the above Sheikh so that he become aware of the World of Light, of, NurMohammed.

[@muhammadabdulmateen8473]

Imaam Ahmad allowed tawassul by means of the Messenger ( ) alone, and others such as Imaam ash-Shawkaanee allowed tawassul by means of him and other Prophets and the Pious. However we, as is the case in all matters where there is disagreement, follow whatever is supported by the proof whatever that is, without blindly sticking to the opinions of men. We do not align ourselves except with the truth. So with regard to the question of tawassul, which we are presently discussing, then we see that the truth is with those who warn against tawassul by means of any created being, and we warn against tawassul by means of any created being. Indeed they cannot find anything to support what they hold except doubts which they raise and possibilities Sheikh albani book tawassul pg38

[@ibnmasood]

Audio is very low on volume shaykh

[@abujessica]

No its fine

[@daisypashe8296]

@@abujessica nope !! De volume is really low....

[@muslim8878]

سبحان اللہ

[@farison2941]

jazakallah sheikh beautiful answer and advice to that ignorant /arrogant scholar

[@hassan333wa]

* تفسير Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn ‘Abbâs { وَمَا يُؤْمِنُ أَكْثَرُهُمْ بِٱللَّهِ إِلاَّ وَهُمْ مُّشْرِكُونَ } (And most of them) the people of Mecca (believe not in Allah) deep in their hearts; it is also said that this means: they do not believe in the worship of Allah (except that they attribute partners (unto Him)) openly.

[@wolfdark4138]

The audio is very low.

[@muhammadabdulmateen8473]

Imaam Ahmad allowed tawassul by means of the Messenger ( ) alone, and others such as Imaam ash-Shawkaanee allowed tawassul by means of him and other Prophets and the Pious. However we, as is the case in all matters where there is disagreement, follow whatever is supported by the proof whatever that is, without blindly sticking to the opinions of men. We do not align ourselves except with the truth. So with regard to the question of tawassul, which we are presently discussing, then we see that the truth is with those who warn against tawassul by means of any created being, and we warn against tawassul by means of any created being. Indeed they cannot find anything to support what they hold except doubts which they raise and possibilities Sheikh albani book tawassul pg38

[@muslim0704]

Correction* Chapter 7 Surah 5

[@muslim0704]

3:25 min of the video

[@indianrational6887]

What's the difference between a salafi and kulfi. Just curious to know is it a different school of thought. Or is it a theological difference

[@solsak836]

Isn't a kulfi a dessert?

[@indianrational6887]

@@solsak836 Not sure if it is a new age sect or desert.

[@amjadazad9465]

I know we cannot ask a dead person for help but is it allowed to ask the living to make dua for us?

[@ahmedibrahim4997]

yes

[@user-cp4by2rt4i]

اللهم صل وسلم وبارك على نبينا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه والتابعين أجمعين بإحسان إلى يوم الدين

[@muslim8878]

الحمداللہ

[@leemajor5003]

Is it a coincidence that you have such a beautiful snow backdrop or is it some genius video editing....

[@daisypashe8296]

Wanted2 ask de something!!

[@user-fs5jd5de5w]

اللهم صلي على محمد واله وسلم تسليما كثيرا الى يوم الدين والحمد لله

[@EnnisSallihovich]

صل و ليس صلي

[@jwarior]

since when this man ( al qadi) became a Islamic scholar?

[@BlurredFiction]

Yasir is Qadhi and Jahil Abu Layth is Mufti. Many deviant so called scholars deceiving the Ummah

[@holdshiftt2run308]

Bro, don't you know. He is a "The0Loogian".

[@kimballchoo7657]

@@holdshiftt2run308 the hole

[@marinaisananrada3236]

Bismillah I love you and sh. Jasir. He may have said something but he means no bad. I personally would never ask dead it’s very simple. Thank you! Amin! May Allah guide us all!

[@fifafreebies8941]

Correct understanding of "Dua is Worship". The issue here is what does he mean by du`a? If he means prayer, then no Muslim will disagree that it is kufr to make du`a to the dead. If, however, the meaning of du`a here is simply calling, without any sense of worship to the person called, then this is another matter. Should someone claim that every du’a is worship then how would they understand the following verse in the Holy Qur’an: لاَّ تَجْعَلُواْ دُعَآءَ الرَّسُولِ بَيْنَكُمْ كَدُعَآءِ بَعْضِكُمْ بَعْضاً “Make not the addressing (du’a’) of the Prophet among you like your addressing one another…” So basically we cannot interpret du`a to mean worship in every context. A call without worshiping the called upon is just a call, and it is not shirk. Moreover, calling a person who has left this world is done every day in every single one of the 5 daily prayers, where a Muslim says, “Ya Ayyuhan-Nabi,” i.e. “O Prophet!”

[@cure4islamophobia649]

Why Islam? In response to the question why we as Muslims think that God has chosen only Islam as religion, we Muslims do not think that Prophet Muhammad appeared with some new religion that is different from that of Adam, Noah, Moses, Abraham Joseph, Jacob, or Jesus. We believe in all of these prophets, and that they were all saying the same thing: “Believe in One God and worship only Him.” That’s it - nothing more, nothing less. In the Quran it is mentioned that Prophet Muhammad is only the final prophet in a long line of prophets. In his sayings, Prophet Muhammad calls all the other prophets “my brothers”, because he is very aware of the heritage and long tradition of prophethood that he belonged to. Islam: From God, Not Muhammad In addition, in the Quran, God tells us: Say: We believe in Allah and that which is revealed unto us and that which was revealed unto Abraham, and Ishmael, and Isaac, and Jacob, and the tribes, and that which Moses and Jesus received, and that which the prophets received from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and unto Him we have surrendered. (Quran 2:136) That means we believe in the message that Jesus (peace be upon him) received just as we believe in the message that Muhammad (peace be upon him) received. We do not see Islam as the religion of Muhammad, but rather, it is the religion of God, and it is the same message that all the prophets of God received throughout history. Islam means submitting to the Creator and believing in all His prophets and messengers, and not picking or choosing some of them alone. In other words, it is the duty of every follower of Muhammad to believe in all the prophets who came before him (peace be upon them all). Only Muslims Will Enter Paradise? Moving to the question why Muslims only will enter paradise, we believe that the judgment lies in the hands of God, as He is the Most Just and even more important, He is the Most Loving and Most Merciful and Compassionate. It is never for us to judge in His place. In fact, it is prohibited in Islam to specify Hell for any human being, no matter what his or her beliefs appear to be. Muslim scholars have also taught that one shouldn’t hold any human being in contempt because he or she might be closer to God than oneself. Being our Creator, only God knows what is in our hearts, our intentions, our actions, and our speech. He knows whether we have harmed people or whether we have sought for peace and understanding among His creation. In Islam, even Muslims can never be sure whether they will be going to heaven or hell. Allah says in the Quran: Those who believe (in the Quran), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabians,- any who believe in God and the Last Day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve. (Quran 2:62). Here we find that Islam teaches that all people whether technically Jews or Christians or even Sabians (an ancient religious group) are entitled to be rewarded from God. That is on the condition that they believe in God and the Day of Judgment and lead a good life. The Difference Between a “Good Person” and a “Believer” A non-Muslim, by definition, is a person who does not recognize God as a Sovereign Law giver Who rewards the good and punishes the bad. For this reason, he has no claim to any reward from God. He may be doing apparently good deeds; but his good deeds are not based on seeking to do God’s will. So they can only get the instrumentally good results that they can naturally have in this world, and not the reward of the other world which can only come from morally good acts. As for Muslims, who apparently hold the right beliefs - they will get the Divine reward only if they lead good lives derived from the right beliefs. This is quite different than the Jewish and Christian beliefs. Jews believe that the Children of Israel are the ones specially chosen by God for all His blessings. Similarly Christians maintain that those who believe in Christ’s atonement are guaranteed of heaven, irrespective of their actions. Unlike both these groups, Islam holds that anyone who leads a good correct life, here on earth, on the basis that there is a God Who is the Supreme Ruler and Judge of all His creatures, will be rewarded in the hereafter.

[@barotumsaillu6614]

Common Sense is challenged ? what do we need help from a dade people? when Allah claims he is closer than our jugular vein "And indeed We have created man, and We know whatever thoughts his inner self develops, and We are closer to him than (his) jugular vein." (Quran 50:16). "

[@Hornscope]

You'll rarely see someone worshipping or invoking prophet Mohamed pbuh, but surprisingly some ignorant Muslims worship and ask something to benifit them for dead folks they consider Awliya or superior Muslim

[@iimiboy]

Sheikh is funny without trying 😂

[@sisterfleur7523]

Exactly

[@sb_1389]

"we are stupid...but not that much." 😂

[@iimiboy]

@@sb_1389 😁 🤣🤣

[@mdrasid007]

It's a Yasir Qadhi's blunder

[@Abdullah-mt9ns]

الحمدلله

[@mano5830]

Its all misunderstanding .. he means if you go to a grave ang think that the grave it self help you with your needs and have control over things then its shirk. But if you go and know that they dont have any power and they hear you from the grave and Ask them to Ask Allah for forgivness then thats big bidah.

[@aneesudheenka6064]

Correction i have watched the whole lecture He gave 3 scholorly positions and he said he is more inclined to the second one and he gave his reasons He didnt say its the only position that is true

[@frankestein1001]

It doesn’t a matter how many opinions are there, what is his position that is important. It is such a basic thing that nobody needs to be scholar to understand this. He is trying to accomodate untruth with truth for becoming tolerant.

[@aneesudheenka6064]

@@frankestein1001 am more inclined to the opinion that its a shirk to call other than allah but i respect his opinion and his reasons to beleave in the second opinion makes sense to me If someone is studying theology he should be more open minded not compartmentalised to one purticular path

[@spartan187]

Bro very sad to see your video ur mature man . If you don’t agree with your brother have a direct debate and not back bitting . Who said Christian don’t consider mother Mary as GOD ? . Pls bro don’t create division in ummah talk about knowledge without targeting individuals may be he is wrong and so many scholars and mufti make mistakes and correct them later if Allah swt wills so pray for your brother and share your opinion

[@matmat276]

That's a good advice brother this is proper back bitting he should have have contacted him and they talk about it instead of back bitting on social media this sheik is older than yasir Qadhi should know better.

[@gabrielabdul8372]

You are right. Remember we live in a century when character assassinating of scholars became normal issue. False accusations in this Ummah has started in the time of Caliph Uthman bin Afan. People take words out of context.

[@Hassan-ed1mr]

Tatal madness the way this sheikhs behave this day. may Allah protect us. Shaykh Yasir may Allah protect him all what he is trying to say is we have come to gather for the coman cause of muslims and not regarding ane groep to be sure the rightly guided and the rest misguided. Allah know the best.

[@amabdullah9678]

Agree with you 100%, but this is a deeper issue, its Wahabis doctrine to slander, blackmail and ostracize even there own Salafi Ullamas for having a different views other than there own. They have made slandering Halal.

[@hassan333wa]

Kashani Tafsir { وَمَا يُؤْمِنُ أَكْثَرُهُمْ بِٱللَّهِ إِلاَّ وَهُمْ مُّشْرِكُونَ } And most of them when they believe in God, with cognitive faith, only do so by ascribing partners [to Him], by affirming [the existence of] an existent other than Him; or [when they believe] with entific faith, then only by committing idolatry by being veiled in their I-nesses;

[@victoriastefan66]

إِن تَدْعُوهُمْ لا يَسْمَعُوا دُعَاءَكُمْ وَلَوْ سَمِعُوا مَا اسْتَجَابُوا لَكُمْ وَيَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ يَكْفُرُونَ بِشِرْكِكُمْ وَلا يُنَبِّئُكَ مِثْلُ خَبِيرٍ . If you invoke (or call upon) them, they hear not your call, and if (in case) they were to hear, they could not grant it (your request) to you. And on the Day of Resurrection, they will disown your worshipping them.(iakfuruuna bi SHIRKIKUM -i.e.your SHIRK) And none can inform you (O Muhammad ) like Him Who is the All-Knower (of each and everything). Surah Al Fatir with translation of meanings

[@user-wv4qh9me6y]

حول أي موضوع يتكلم الشيخ في هذا المقطع ؟

[@user-vs2ln6vg1r]

رد على شخص أسمه ياسر القاضي وهو شخص له إنحرافات عقائدية شديدة بسبب وقوعه تحت سلطة الثقافة الغالبة، وهو كان محترما وقريبا من الحق إلا أنه أصبح بعيدا عن طريق الحق بشدة و الشيخ هنا يرد على كلامه عن في محاضرة إدعى فيها ياسر القاضي أن الإستغاثة بالأموات تجوز وأنها ليست كفر أو وثنية

[@shadowwhowalk]

@@user-vs2ln6vg1r بل قال أنه حرام ومن ذرائع الشرك. لكن إن كانت النية من الإستغاثة من الأموات هي طلب الشفاعة عند الله، فهي ضلالة ولا تصل درجة الشرك.

[@princemangara7911]

As Allah mentioned in the Qur'an that he knows what is in every heart, and he is the best of Judges...

[@limitedquantitysufiyyahexp4905]

Using his logic, nobody in history had committed shirk

[@shadowwhowalk]

How so?

[@limitedquantitysufiyyahexp4905]

@@shadowwhowalk he says that no one thinks when calling upon the dead that they are Allah, So using his logic even the quraish never committed shirk because they didn't consider the people they were calling on to to be Allah.

[@shadowwhowalk]

@@limitedquantitysufiyyahexp4905 What he said: "The second school says that: No, calling out in by itself is not neccessarily Shirk. Rather, the Shirk elements will come if you believe that the one you are calling is a god, is an Ilah, and you are wanting to worship that Ilah; there must be the intention of worship, why? Because actions are judged by intentions, and if you did not intend to worship other than Allah, then you cannot be held liable for worshipping other than Allah. [...] So if you were to bow your head to a person out of respect, you would not be considered a Mushrik. If you go to the far east and everyone is bowing, and you are like: 'Ok I'll also bow', you are not considering the president to be a god, that is what they are all doing, it is Haram and you shouldn't do that, but it is not Shirk. Now, if you bow down to the statue of a god, and you prostrate thinking that the god is worthy of respect, then this is Shirk, what is the difference? Your Niya. In the first case you didn't intend to worship, in the second case you did intend worship of a diety. Likewise this group will argue that to call out to an entity is not in of itself Shirk. Rather, only if you believe that this entity has powers and is worthy of worship and is a god it would be shirk, otherwise it would be Haram." ???

[@solsak836]

@@limitedquantitysufiyyahexp4905 idols are different to souls

[@limitedquantitysufiyyahexp4905]

@@solsak836 Both take the same ruling

[@iharar]

yassir Qadi expose wahabis we love you keep exposing.

[@newbosniaks3929]

Why would anyone invoking dead people beside Allah swt, Al Hayyul-Qayyum?

[@solsak836]

Don't speak without knowledge

[@hassan333wa]

* تفسير Tafsir al-Tustari { وَمَا يُؤْمِنُ أَكْثَرُهُمْ بِٱللَّهِ إِلاَّ وَهُمْ مُّشْرِكُونَ } And most of them do not believe in God without ascribing partners [to Him].He [Sahl] said:This is referring to the association [of others with God] (shirk) by the self which incites to evil (nafs ammāra), as was [indicated] when the Prophet said, ‘Association [of others with God] (shirk) in my nation is more hidden than the creeping of an ant over a stone.’ This is the inner meaning of the verse. However, the outer meaning of the verse refers to the fact that the polytheists among the Arabs believe in God, just as He has said, If you ask them, who created them, they will certainly say ‘God’…[43:87] Even so they are polytheists who believe in some of the messengers but do not believe in others.His words, Exalted is He:

[@sssaaa3796]

يعطيك العافيه

[@user-wg4zh3kv6n]

Jazakallah khair. I am so pleased that Yasir Qadhi is finally called out for some rather nonsensical answers and some things that he say. May Allah keep us all on the right path. Amen suma amen.

[@myfoodmyeating722]

Assalamualikum all. With due respect to every scholars, please try to understand the actual meaning of some one's speech. Do not refute just for the sake of refuting by taking something out of context. if you listen full lecture of Shaikh Yasir qadhi, you will understand: He mentioned, ' is it shirk if you ask your friend to help you with something knowing that all power is with Allah and no one else can help? ' The answer will be 'NO it's not shirk'. Same way if some one asks something from a dead man thinking he can help with someway is itself isn't shirk but it's Haram. Being a simple layman if I can understand clearly what shaikh Yasir qadhi meant, then why some of these scholars are refuting him without taking consideration the main essence? Fear Allah and do not refute/slander other scholars just to prove; you are more knowledgeable than the refuted one. Allahu Alem.

[@jackryder6732]

No he is wrong. Calling anyone in the grave is shirk simple, doesn't matter about your intention. The actions and when you dua, its a form of worship. Allah clearly says in Quran. Please read

[@myfoodmyeating722]

@@jackryder6732 So if you ask ( dua) to your friend to help you with something is shirk? If this is not shirk then why if you ask same thing to your dead friend will be shirk? Is it because when he was alive he had power and when he is dead he doesn't have power? Doesn't matter a person is alive or dead, power is always with Allah. If Allah doesn't want then the live person can't help either. Yasir Qadhi didn't say that it is allowed to ask dead person. He clearly said it is HARAM, but not shirk. Think logically with an open mind and you will find the answer. Allahu Alem.

[@jackryder6732]

@@myfoodmyeating722lets break it down. dua is a worship, so you ask a living person to pray for you for once good help, as he is alive it is permissible, but you cannot ask him to be a mediator or make recommendations to Allah. Rather just pray for his good health or what ever. There are rulings even when you pray, so right knowledge is the key here. Now the same person is dead, he is cut off from this world. So, now you cannot ask him to pray as his deeds book is closed. Islam is a very simple religion. Dont complicate nor innovate. Do some more study on this. You will get it in sha Allah. I had to do..

[@jackryder6732]

@@myfoodmyeating722 Also watch this please. Lets help each other to gain knowledge. Same topic few spears have spoken. Please watch

[@myfoodmyeating722]

@@jackryder6732 Assalamualikum. I think I or Yasir qadhi could not make things clear. No one said that asking dead person is allowed. Far from it, Yasir qadhi clearly said asking dead person is HARAM. The discussion is an academic about if asking something to a dead person on it itself is 'SHIRK' or not. Allahu Alem.

[@sh-fx6mr]

Shaikh you didnt anser the main question that this thoudht was first time introduced by Muhammad ibn wahab. There was ijma for 1000 years even he qouted sh Ibn taimiya abt his view. Kawarji they brings the ayah and then they says this is the meaning of this so this is the ruling.

[@zinetabdella5561]

Assalamu Alaykum brother, i am just a Muslims, i not a Scholar. we are Muslims, we believe only one Allah. Please don't open the door for the people Agaynst Muslim. If he mistake tell him privately what is wrong, let teach each other that let stop hit each other. Don't forget what Mohammed Rasulullah teaches the umaa. For give me if I heart your feelings . JazakaAllah

[@I_am_the_jamil]

Yale university change our sheikh to bad. We pray guide for him and us.

[@bassamlux]

You almost didn't leave out any scholar without criticism and calling them disbelievers or Mushrik. Fear Allah and take care of your own self.

[@hassan333wa]

أن حذيفة يعني ابن اليمان رضي الله عنه حدثه قال: قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلّم «إن مما أتخوف عليكم رجل قرأ القرآن حتى إذا رؤيت بهجته عليه وكان رداؤه الإسلام اعتراه إلى ما شاء الله انسلخ منه ونبذه وراء ظهره وسعى على جاره بالسيف ورماه بالشرك» قال قلت يانبي الله أيهما أولى بالشرك المرمي أو الرامي ؟ قال «بل الرامي» Hudhaifa i.e. Ibn al Yaman (ra) said that the Prophet (saw) said: Verily, I fear about a man from you who will read the Qur’an so much that his face will become enlightened and he will come to personify Islam. This will continue until Allah desires. Then these things will be taken away from him when he will disregard them by putting them all behind his back and will attack his neighbor with the sword accusing him of Shirk. The Prophet was asked - which of the two will be deserving of such an accusation? - The attacker or the attacked? The Prophet replied - the attacker (the one accusing the other of Shirk) [Narrated by Ibn Hibban in his Sahih, Volume No. 1, Page No. 282,

[@ebutariq99]

Can anyone tell me is Qadir Yasir Muslim or mushrik??Why everyone refute him and they are calling him "akhi" ???Why the matter is still confusing??Please shaikh EXPLAIN and don't fear people but fear Allah and tell us the HAQQ!!

[@ismailjama178]

You guys talk about the issue in hand,not the person.Bring your prove and deliil and keep the person out of the issue.

[@Abdullah-mt9ns]

He spoke about the issue very well.

[@kimballchoo7657]

Yasser AlQadi career is destroyed by his fellow muslim... well thanks to Momet Hijab’s interview with him...

[@mohebarghandiwal6434]

I never heard brother Yasir saying it is allowed to ask a dead instead of Allah. I don’t know why you guys make such an accusations. He is a great scholar. Please don’t be jealous of him. The only negatives he has is that he has goes on for a long speech to answer questions. He can shorten it to not more than 5 minutes because especially youngsters don’t have the patience to listen long speech and they want to get an answer. He should be able to mention a few point of views of scholars and say his point of view. Please don’t discourage him. We don’t have that many talented scholars.

[@SanaullahGh]

I don't know how they listened to his lectures. The hatred is so much that they can't comprehend him. He clearly said its haraam. And that's enough. And gave his reasons why he supported that opinion.

[@manarballal4187]

Thanks Allah than thanks to you. One more thing let me tell our muslims brothers..if samoans reading something or he just make a Fitna between us than we should going to the reference Quran and Hadith. After that we will no who is the wrong person between us( Dajal)

[@knowledgeseeker1548]

Link pls of Yasir Qadhi saying this. Investigate before believe

[@iimiboy]

Since last year I've heard yasir qadhi is going to come out with this, nasseha sessions mentioned this

[@CEO786]

Really looking forward to Shaykh Yasir Qadhi joining Zaytuna Institute with Shaykh Hamza Yusuf

[@holdshiftt2run308]

Yasir Qadhi's tactic is to ramble until you forget the question and the words no longer make sense.

[@b.i.n.a2959]

It would have been better if you had privately talked to brother Yasir Qadhi instead of trying to put him down in front of the world..this is not our prophets teaching Sir, whoever you are 🤲😪

[@MinMin-ng7rr]

Public Lecture required public action, as it is expected for public correction.

[@dr.mobarakali255]

Jazakum Allahu Khairan Shaikh. Allahumma Salli Ala Muhammad Wa Ale Muhammad. Did Fatima AS not go to her father's SAS grave and complained painfully to him SAS about the affliction that befell her after his SAS'S death? What do we call that?