A Theory You've Never Heard Of | Michael Robinson | TEDxUniversityofHartford

[@MrJeffcoley1]

This lecture underscores the importance of understanding the past on its own terms instead of projecting modern ideas and attitudes back into the past.

[@AkakaDomenjer]

This lecture is lies and agenda.

[@alexanderrober9587]

@@AkakaDomenjer you must not understand scientific theory. Imagine actually using your brain.

[@vibratoryuniverse308]

@@alexanderrober9587 do you think that’s an intellectual argument lmao, sad

[@thomaslangkvist5830]

Realyminportant to know what exactly are we fitghtingfor

[@graceclague747]

@@AkakaDomenjer totally agree. Neverending whiteman ego

[@joshbarr6390]

Guys. This man is explaining history and a theory that existed; not his personal views/opinions. He ends the video explaining why it's wrong and the damage it has caused and why it's important to remember. He is trying to understand the point of view of the theory's author. There is no racism in this video. If you see racism, it seems like the mr Magoo effect.

[@rosyenrica]

yes, he is honing in on a lot scientific racism that was prevalent during the 18th and 19th centuries within the social sciences and medicine which suited the colonialist agenda and the dangers thereof, and which are still relevant today (i.e that the observer is separate and therefore objective on what he or she is observing which many within the social sciences in particular have been trying to challenge by highlighting the need for transparency on the lens/perspective, and reasons for the research), but also how those theories from that time, have lingered on in the present and this is exemplary of this, so yes i agree with you.

[@TheCaptnHammer]

If you don’t watch a video in full, to its conclusion then you should not comment. I see a lot of comments that are addressed by the video. Negative commenters seems to watch the first minute of a video before posting nonsense.

[@jcb3393]

It shows the danger of latching on to the "scientific theory du jour" without allowing for peer review, testing, refinement or even dismantling and replacement with better theories.

[@KeithCooper-Albuquerque]

Josh Barr: You are absolutely correct! Well-stated! Thanks for a dose of reality!

[@wildborat88]

No he is saying his personal vews because egyptians built the pyramids and they have more middle eastern dna than african

[@dolmanationable]

It's REALLY obvious that people commenting are not actually watching the video. He very clearly does not support this theory, he's outlining how it shaped European colonization of Africa. Watch the damn video before commenting.

[@kgthebest11]

Thank you

[@CastleDragon78]

Right!

[@matthewguzda4075]

Yeah but that's nothing to get angry about! Gr=rrr=r

[@dudeinoakland]

If it's a 'Theory you've never heard of', as the title states then why does he have to debunk it?

[@danielbaronne753]

@@silentgee9784 well the African continent is at its most peaceful ever and is the fastest growing economic block in the world. You are mistaken to say that the people of Africa are totally in control of their country as multinationals from the western world still have major say there. Remember this is a continent traumatized for hundred of years by slavery and collonization and is slowly recovering from such a trauma. It will take a while for the utopia but we are heading there.

[@alelgnmass9712]

I'm Ethiopian. In Ethiopian you can find from the blackest to nearly white person. I think Ethiopians are the most diverse people in the world. And those people on the illusion are actually my ancestors. They live on the northern part of Ethiopia. That is how they use to live and dress back those days.

[@GhostRiley-zs8zb]

I think Indians are the most diverse, I mean you can find really dark skinned people in India in the south or in Islands to a person who is as white as europeans in the far north mountanious regions

[@tv_agenda]

My mind exactly went there as well-- Northern Ethiopians feel superior to other Ethiopians because of this theory.

[@Legendarynorth]

no they are not you think your race is so much then other races in africa you are forgetting about the ancient egyptians yeah

[@maralfniqle5092]

Indeed because of 500 years of Alexander's colonisation. There are tribes in the north that still talk a distinct mix of ancient Greek. So yes

[@tv_agenda]

@@maralfniqle5092 where in Ethiopia?

[@madoxxxx06]

I'm Rwandan and this theory is very right, the Hamatic theory literally caused the genocide, Tutsi and Hutu used to be social classes, but when this theory was weaponized and used as part of the divide and rule policy of the Belgium what was a social class became a different race. That's why so many Tutsi were thrown into rivers, it was to literally send them back to the Mediterranean Sea through the Nile River, where they supposedly came from.

[@ph222000]

The world is crazy .. (Most)Americans don't realize how lucky we are!

[@jamesfranxx6151]

@John Wright links?

[@Lancetronium]

Damn! It's amazing how much power a misunderstanding or assumption can have, when we're looking for an excuse to rid ourselves of negative emotion.

[@trulurecords]

The "Hamatic" curse has been debunked...admitted by the one who added it to the scriptures himself. Now let's look at the history of Yakov,(Yakub,Jacob). Also the encyclopedia hermitica by Walter Scott speaks of the Tamahu.

[@davidhollenshead4892]

Mr. Gilbert Habarugaba, We have had similar Ethnic Cleansing here in the US & Canada. The Métis People were of mixed European & Native Ancestry, mostly from the Great Lakes Region. In the US Métis are very rare, as only those who could almost pass for White remained, with the rest being forced West as White Colonists wanted their land so they became part of Nations like the Lakota, Dakota, etc. But in Canada, Métis still exist but until recently were treated as second class citizens who were pushed into the Frontier by White People, who also wanted their land... So here in the states, we are an almost extinct ethnic group...

[@KiberaKid]

As an African, I can't help but feel bemused by the attitudes of these early European travelers. I refuse to concede that they "discovered" anything really, because all these people and places had their own identity and heritage long before their vessels littered our horizons. Further, I am deeply saddened to learn that early Africans accepted and adopted these ideas regarding themselves. However, I am glad that there are scholars out there seeking the truth, for its own sake. Thank you for your work, Mr. Robinson. Love from Kenya.

[@dcs4219]

and the tribal people of North America feel the same.

[@ashantesanaa4310]

The minute he said discovered he lost me

[@Fartinhalerr]

@@ashantesanaa4310 he did discover it for Europeans. That isn't to say it didn't exist prior to this but that this was when Europeans became aware of it.

[@crqf2010ruler]

What "our horizons"? 15:31 Says "Africa is the most diverse place on Earth". Do you understand what this implies? If not, let me elucidate to you: There is no "our" as there is no such thing as a solid "African" person if not for a continent. Do not bring others to your own personal feud, which is unexistent regardless. Otherwise, this would validate the concept of the existence of races, and therefore of unity, and thus, if you are "African" and you think there is such a thing as "our horizons", then the horizons were littered with "their vessels", and their means another group, a cohesive formation, one that is solid, therefore there is a reason for anyone "European" to protest the refugee crisis that's going on and justify expelling them for the sake of countering colonization, which we have seen to cause slavery and to spread misery, and no one would like that again.

[@Fartinhalerr]

@@crqf2010ruler I'm pretty sure race exists. How else can they test the DNA of a skeleton and determine what racial group it belonged to? In some cases not even needing to go this far, they can tell just by looking at it's proportions, that is how distinct the skeletons are from one race to the next.

[@aluxbalum]

As a Native American (Purepecha, Kickapoo, Comanche) it was always so interesting to me and questionable the history of humanity being so lineal. I always thought there was much more to it, talking solely of the Americas there is evidence and indications of world wide populations being present in the hemisphere. Australian aboriginie DNA is found in some Native American nations, so is African and European vestiges pre dating Columbus are wide spread. The folklore of the world has so much in common

[@user-wy2fu4un8r]

This is false, African and European DNA, artifacts, skeletons, etc are not present in any pre Colombian American societies, as for the Australasians it’s theorized that they could have crossed and populated or mixed with the Indigenous people already there. It sounds like you have a belief that you’re trying to make fit when it just doesn’t

[@Bobscolad369]

I think that Native American and Canadians look like a cross between Mongolian, Philippines, Thai and Chinese!! Nobody else not see this?

[@bindaredundat-uv6wz]

EXACTLY . MOST NATIVE AMERICANS CAME FROM CHINA . MANY DONT KNOW THAT.

[@user-wy2fu4un8r]

@@bindaredundat-uv6wz that’s false too, all it takes is a quick google search and you can see where the DNA splits off

[@Faketaxie]

In Kiowa our language come from the same family as Aztecs yet we have stories talking about the white bear( polar bear) and monkey people ( monkeys) of South America but modern history says we originated in yellow stone

[@yu-haowang6710]

Amazing talk. this talk makes me feel that, anthropology nowadays has been developed by hundreds of years, and near half of them are misrecorded, in African history, especially. I'm a stem student, but this video makes me give more attentions on the history and the development of different races.

[@johnmcnulty4425]

Isn't it possible that some of the Inuit picked up some 'blond genes' from the Vikings that settled briefly in Greenland?

[@balderii7340]

Vikings got kicked out Greenland, don't think the Inuit chicks got that frisky with guys twice the size of their men. (get it?)

[@DieFlabbergast]

Much more likely that it was just a genetic accident that led to a single tribe having numerous (exaggeration?) or some blond/blue-eyed individuals. Such things happen in parts of Asia. By this time, they would all have blended back into the larger genetic background.

[@balderii7340]

@@DieFlabbergast But Asians accidentally born with those characteristics are still Asian, aren't they? During the ice-ages Europe wasn't frozen all the time. There were intervals of a 1000 to 10000 years where the glaciers retreated and grew back again. Where people went (back) into Europe when it was a tundra filled with herds of animals and retreated to different parts of land when the glaciers grew back. During those periods it is of course more than likely they had relations with Asians and Africans, therefor passing on their genetics. Because of these relations Europeans and Asians and also Africans share DNA, but they are all at the base separate races. Ice-age mummies were found in the desert of China that were genetically Caucasian. Not Asians with blue eyes, or a branch. bleached in

[@balderii7340]

@@DieFlabbergast Goddammit, half my text is gone! Wait for it,...

[@willyreeves319]

by that measure America has been briefly settled by white people

[@mullimulli6259]

And there's the Dafaqarwi tribe. They are the ones in the long grass that jump up and down and shout "where Dafaqarwi?"

[@magsmcgarrigle981]

mulli mulli That’s a Dad joke I can’t wait to tell my Dad!! 🤣‼️🇮🇪

[@keirfarnum6811]

mulli mulli 😂😂😂

[@MrDomiko]

Dude!!! LOL.

[@royshippen]

@@MrDomiko It's "We're the dafarqawi"

[@ChrisAguilar504]

This is literally my dad’s favorite joke 😂

[@21stcenturion68]

Those explorers very well may have misinterpreted what they saw, but "blonde" is a very specific descriptor that you can't mistake for anything else.

[@ulalaFrugilega]

21st Centurion yeah! Ge let that drop completely in the latter part of his speech! Why weren't there drawings or some such things?

[@bmanwells4200]

Blonde does not mean white...

[@chipwalter4490]

Many children (and some adults keep) blond/ reddish hair in tribes of New Guinea and even some Australian aborigines. Also the whitish hair color of albino people can be taken for blond, which happens in every ethnicity. I think the Global examples given were too cursory, and were left without an confirmation or refutation for the subsequent jump-off into his Mr. Magoo diagnosis specifically directed at African colonialism. ...very weak TEDtalk here...

[@DfsOutlier]

@@chipwalter4490 - That's what I thought, Feels like he is trying to disprove all white tribes discovered in the world by attacking one instance in one place. Very poor argument.

[@consuelochavez3610]

Children in the Andes grow reddish dark hair a sign of malnutrition

[@superwildside4585]

"History is a set of lies agreed upon." - Napolean Bonaparte

[@Seeker0fTruth]

Yep! History is written by the victors!

[@MatheusSantos-sn1cu]

​@@Seeker0fTruthNo. History is written by those who care about it, Vietnam did not win the war but the narrative did. In my country, Brazil, the left that has governed the nation since the 80s states day after day that “we are losing, but we will recover for the good of the people”. Of course there are documents that attest to the lies, but we no longer live in the Age of History, we are in the Age of Propaganda and absolute slavery (hidden by words like "democracy", "equality" etc. all of them emptied of meaning, used as words -trigger to awaken mass hysterical spirits.

[@arianhrodkeltoi8104]

No. That's Story. History is a science, collects evidences, corrects every time new info is found.

[@Seeker0fTruth]

@@arianhrodkeltoi8104 I mean….its not a science….or it would be called “science”.

[@lucasroche8639]

Which by definition is a lie.

[@elsea8901]

...and in 5 more years it’ll be presented to me for the third time as “a theory youve never heard of”....testing my memory or some algorithmic dingus...

[@Peter_Wang]

Not sure 2021 is going to be kind to this theory.

[@sbritton1313]

10 years...

[@vif3182]

it really is irritating the red bar isn't permanent after you've already seen a thingy

[@jhonny3053]

@@vif3182 As long as you watch a video while you're logged in it does.

[@deniseclark9051]

El Sea - will you be my friend? The above comment is excellent in spite of the current ubiquitous osmoregulatory derping... I now know what hope is- Thank You. Do you wear a faraday hat? I was certain we were the equivalent of paramecium and bam - someone else notices. I am going to go meditate in the Bermuda Triangle for the rest of my existence.

[@byamugishabrian8062]

I am Ugandan. 🇺🇬 The entire story surrounds my place of origin (Western Region of Uganda) so I feel particularly touched by such a discovery. I have for long sought to find the cause of difference in color among the natives, which is usually attributed to intermarriages with foreign nations. This theory opens up a new field of discovery. Fascinating

[@amirhassanel6124]

The differences in skin tone do not mean there was intermarriage with foreigners outside of Africa.

[@Addictedtoyoutube9]

Blacks are blacks with variation is skin tones.

[@VndNvwYvvSvv]

Yes, the old "out of Africa" hypothesis has been thoroughly disproven. It's a narcissistic trap.

[@mikeaskme3530]

@@VndNvwYvvSvv actually it has not and you just saying it has does not make it correct. Ignorance is abundant on this video.

[@sharaudramey9336]

@@VndNvwYvvSvv 🤣🤣🤣

[@dipaolo3955]

It seems to me that people are making negative comments before watching his conclusion where he claims the Hamitic Hypothesis is BS. Either that or his Mr. Magoo hypothesis applies to the comments as well.

[@dieselbourbon3728]

He does this with zero evidence or proof. Speculation is not very scientific.

[@i-evi-l]

The Mr Magoo Hypothesis is very very good!

[@r13hd22]

Racial determination is based on cranial measurements, not skin color. Did Mr Robinson, at ANY point, use SCIENCE to form his hypothesis? No. He SHOULD have found out the cranial measurements of these "white tribes" to determine if they WERE white tribes or not, then make a hypothesis. So, it is actually Mr Robinson that is suffering from his own Mr Magoo hypothesis.

[@theculturewatch2414]

Its sad you actually believe this.. sadder still is you believe makes you smarter than the rest of us.. waiting for your arbitrary and impotent 'stats'

[@Drutzie]

Richard Depaola jr - Where did you read that race is based on cranial measurements, Mien Kamph?

[@jonburton4897]

The Mr Magoo hypothesis is spot on , on how humans filter out what they accept as the truth

[@Hj61S827]

Really? You think after this entire talk, and Stanley’s life work, that he just “made it all up?” Because he was white? That’s a cop out and dna testing should easily be able to confirm or deny his findings.

[@bassplayinggoalie]

It's also widely known as confirmation bias

[@brucekliewer2623]

Yes. This include people who hold evolution to be true. They filter information through that filter. So when soft tissue was found in dinosaur bones, that couldn’t not accept that the age of the dinosaur could be much less than their beliefs would allow so they had to come up with a counter explanation to explain how soft tissue could be there.

[@velikovskysghost]

@Jon Burton This is especially true when one has visited the thunderbolts site!, they have a theory based on the early works of Velikovsky that makes so much sense!

[@sandyclaflin2844]

I just told him to dump the Mr. Mcgough hypothesis. The reason is it's because it's a very prejudicial against the blind. I know I experienced it.

[@seanmcneill8899]

Amazing talk...Never forget history is written by a person, or even worse by governments.

[@loveandlight3486]

"his story"

[@marcorodrigues8303]

de onde já ser viu que há função de um Governante e Escrever Story . agora como e que se explica a situação das Redes sociais e da mídia se uma vez que a Story foi escrita . só um social mídia.e o Governo fez foi sonda e dar GOP e Depois foi compla e estrupar a mídia Adulterar as Redes e clonar Rask isso ele fez com as redes sociais da mídia em Diretamente com Direct Elected.😮#🤡🚬

[@gerryvandepol7630]

History is created by victors…

[@jeanmitton4287]

History is written by side that wins

[@johnadkins5918]

My history teacher taught me a very important lesson that has stayed with me my entire life and that is “There are three sides to all history the victors the losers and those that were caught up in any given event”

[@mariacuevas8778]

What I understood with this talk is the when history was being created there might’ve been more than one theory but the side that prevailed was the strongest theory which suppressed all other theories and thus we might not have the whole story of our history. Being able to go back in history to study all theories of the times and thus maybe understand why according to our knowledge of history sometimes it doesn’t even make sense.

[@alexandriarennie5992]

Person As side of what happened Person Bs side of what happened What really happened all three of these are true unless one person intentionally lied but basically the one who wins the battle is the hero who tells their story

[@satoshinakamoto840]

@@alexandriarennie5992 thus history is his Story, only once story

[@danh7739]

I think someone "Someone doth protest to much" After all, I can logically prove to you Dragon Flies can't fly as we watch we watch them fly about. Best of luck tu you???.

[@jamberry8026]

History is not theory, but rather the recall of facts which have been recorded. If you lie in present tense and record that lie your history will also be a lie.

[@satoshinakamoto840]

@@danh7739 oh u smart

[@kentcoble4578]

"They had European hair, noses, and eyes and regarded themselves as foreign people who came from elsewhere." "So they were European?" "No it's just coincidence"

[@codyplatona6886]

Uhhh have you heard of genetic mutation d umbass

[@glenncater1]

they were the original africans !!

[@mr.z9829]

@@glenncater1 😂

[@glenncater1]

@@mr.z9829 WE KNOW THAT AFRICANS GOT DARKER OVER TIME WHEN THEY LEFT EUROPE AND STARTED LIVING IN AFRICA! NOW LOOK AT THE AFRICANS! THEY ARE ALMOST ALL DARK-SKINNED NOW !!

[@moorishsociety7339]

for exploiters anything needs me some extra explanation.

[@johnsutherland168]

Interesting. As a genealogist I recognize that many times there may be inaccuracies in paper recorded history, some errors made through simple recording mistakes, some through record translation problems, some through background and experience mistakes, and some through malicious intent, but what genetic genealogy is now showing us is that DNA testing and analysis doesn't lie. Perhaps the way to resolve some of these paper historical questions is to focus a bit more on DNA testing and analysis. However, I've tested with five current fairly large DNA testing companies and found that none of them agree with each other 100%, and that is largely because they all test different parts of the DNA string. But, one of the side benefits of most DNA testing lab results are the migration maps that are often provided, and they could perhaps help resolve some of the white tribe questions. But this effort, because of the numbers of potential records involved, might (would) take a lot of human effort and involvement. Perhaps a problem better resolved by computer, eh? But, would the human written computer algorithms be true, open, and honest, or would they be biased? Humans are such complex animals...

[@Mr.Phoreskin]

All that understanding, you are high in empathy. I bet you are your loved one’s therapist aren’t you?

[@johnsutherland168]

@@Mr.Phoreskin -- Some love me, and some want to stay away from me. I suspect we are what we are, and since we are all different, we appeal to some, and not to others, eh?

[@janforney]

But especially it points to how humans WILL interpret any genetic or color differences tribally or at least thru different lenses. This man provides good empathetic framing which is sorely needed

[@johnsutherland168]

@@janforney -- I suspect that part of the human communications problems is that we-all have different backgrounds and goals in life and we-all often use different word and phrase definitions. Of course the communists always want to put humans into the same box, but that never works out very well for anyone but those who support such a bizarre view of life. If we view others as being different and ask more questions, rather than take the 'I know everything' attitude, I suspect there would be less conflict on Earth. But, I could be wrong.

[@7x779]

It seems I recall sing some videos on here that exposed what a hoax and fraud DNA testing is and that it is not able to so accurately find one's ancestry as they claim. That was a few years ago so not sure if it's changed and become more accurate

[@brontologos]

In a remote part of Paraguay there are people who are blue eyed and blonde. This is because, back in the Thirties, a bunch of idealistic Australians decided to go to South America and create a utopian society. They set up a self-governing commune in the jungle, anticipating the hippie communes of the Seventies, which, like the communes of the Seventies, eventually crumbled from in-fighting and power struggles. The utopian dream failed but the descendants of those idealists have passed their genes on to several generations via intermarriage with Paraguayans. The Out of Africa model of racial dispersion is not a one-way street. For thousands of years different peoples have travelled and set up colonies in distant lands which is why I would have no trouble believing that might be light skinned Arctic peoples that were descended, perhaps, from Vikings. The fallacy lies in assuming that certain characteristics such as light skin, blue eyes and blonde hair will eventually be overcome by the "dominant" genes of dark hair and skin and brown eyes. Genetic traits can persist for hundreds of generations particularly if people continue to marry within their own ethnic group.

[@gratiaxantos9309]

Please tell this to that crazy lady on Red Ice TV who seems to think all non-white people are plotting to bully white people from planet earth.

[@MASTERARTGOD]

gratia xantos you mean the people who have said they will hold whites as slaves for 500 years then genocide whites. There are reasons she believes that

[@rosemaryhall7009]

Do you know about the thousands of Scandinavian people who migrated to South America between 1910 and 1945? My family in Sweden moved to Argentina in 1916. Australian people are the descendants of prisoners from the UK and Ireland who were shipped to the penal colonies built by the crowned heads of England.

[@WhiteFyre]

1. - There some natives of New Zealand who are red-headed. They tell of a story where their ancestors come from far away to escape a brutal war and came to New Zealand, and married with the Natives already there. Apparently some of them didn't stay there, but move to PNG. When DNA tests were done on these people, it was found that they are closely related to people from the Middle East! 2. - We are not taking into account that we do *not* know what happened in our *previous civilisations!* There are TONS of evidence saying that the world was previously civilised (and possibly an advanced civiisation). But a great cataclysm/natural disaster/flood occurred that wiped out humans save for a few survivors. And we lost all our technology and scientific knowledge. We reverted back to living as cave dwellers. 2.i. - WHO'S TO SAY that this previous civilisation wasn't international, and that the people travelled all the time? Maybe that is why there are PYRAMIDS around the world, including Japan, China, Indonesia, South America, Egypt and so on. 2.ii. - This might also explain why the DNA of SOUTH Native Americans were found to be genetically connected to Native *Australian* DNA, whereas the DNA of NORTH American Natives are connected to Eastern Europe genetically! 2.iii. We don't remember all our human history!! ✨🐬✨

[@georgedunn320]

Red hair is the result of a mutation in which melanin is imperfectly assembled. It can occur anywhere.

[@pinkdoll3578]

This doesn’t have enough likes for my taste

[@WhiteFyre]

@@pinkdoll3578 oh I get likes and comments disappearing all the time.

[@daaadoooo]

*finally: the based land*

[@SirMonty_]

I dont get it

[@jehriko7525]

@@SirMonty_ consider yourself lucky

[@qwejxkwbdk]

I don’t get it

[@johnymackd7933]

Hyperborea, we must return

[@qwejxkwbdk]

@@johnymackd7933 isn’t Hyperboria a far-right conspiracy theory?

[@ethandoingstuff1433]

While there’s little doubt that explorers were seeing real physiological differences among different groups, they were interpreting them according to categories of race imagined by Blumenbach and filtered through popular ideas of white ancestry. Whiteness, after all, is not a color but an idea. There is no simple way to determine ancestry according to a person’s pigment. So explorers did what we so often do-size people up by their hair, facial features, language, clothing, and comportment. In short, the discovery of “white tribes” was less an anthropological discovery than a psychological one: a Rorschach test in which Europeans-confronted by figures that seemed ambiguous-made sense of them using deeply held beliefs about race and history.

[@Psycandy]

I'm Rhodesian. My tribe is indeed lost. Also, Stanley wasn't the first white person in Africa; it's the supposition that he was which creates this entire diatribe. Human pigmentation is relative to resistance to ultraviolet and resistance to skin cancer; lots of sun - dark skin, no sun - light skin. What you postulate here is a separate species, operating outside of this well-established human condition.

[@userman44]

11:26 Robinson: "Literally all of Africa had been carved up by Europeans." Ethiopia: "Excuse me?!?"

[@ashantesanaa4310]

Complete nonsense

[@modrikisadopted6337]

@@ashantesanaa4310 why?

[@ashantesanaa4310]

Carved up as in butchered in obsessive attempt to alter otherwise, any attempt to redefine my Omo-Kibish I DNA is nonsense.

[@brucetucker4847]

Mussolini: gives Ethiopia the side eye.

[@EastlakeRasta7]

Italy occupied Ethiopia relatively recently and yes they did leave but they did fracture the Ethiopian Empire

[@anupamachannan602]

Excellent command over the topic. Very profound and interesting talk. I wonder why some people have given thumbs down. They must be the ones with no interest in the topic and neither listened nor followed anything. Why did you have to comment if this was too over your head? Go look for something you'd follow.

[@JasenChase00]

I'm baffled as an anthropologist, why he finds it fascinating to find caucasoid DNA in Africa because the Northern African regions have caucasoids called Berbers.. you also have carthaginian DNA, and Greek DNA, Roman etc... I always feel it's better called Southern Mediterranean than North Africa!

[@shawnahall7246]

It’s considered both

[@tvelasquez718]

When De Soto ventured in the Southeastern US, he noticed that the Cherokee people had many members with Red & Blonde streaks of hair. And also lighter skin. Historically approximately 500 years prior to DeSotos campaign there was a Welsh campaign by a man named Maddox at the time of William the Conqueror who debarked Wales with 10 ships and were never heard from again. I’d love to see more extensive DNA testing of known Welsh Ancestry.

[@lr7221]

Yes, indeed. So, Stanley may have encountered Albino people. Some tribes in East Africa, Tanzania, Southern Bantu tribes are known for Albinism. These people were either killed or sent far North Africa. As a matter of fact, the Zunni Tribe in the USA were known for albinism. We are all so connected!

[@YungPrince2k16]

@@lr7221 What he claims about Africa is wrong tho at least by calling them White, we have evidence of this but they were Semetic Middle eastern/Caucasian people, not Europeans which we consider White today. Ham is a Middle eastern Lineage .. not European. East Africans have confirmed Semetic ancient dna.

[@SCHMALLZZZ]

@@YungPrince2k16 Arabs and Jews and all other Semetic Speaking peoples are considered white by the USA census.

[@YungPrince2k16]

@@SCHMALLZZZ Brother even if we go off lightskin genes, lightskin evolved firstly in the Middle East 22-28,000 years ago compared to the genes that evolved in Europe 8,500 years ago which by the way both are two different genes. All the ancient migrations into North/East Africa were from the Middle East, not Europe. They were lightskin yes but not what we in America label "White". Stop trying to steal Middle Eastern history.

[@Musick79]

@@YungPrince2k16 caucasians came from Asia. Ever heard of the Caucasus mountains? I’m sure many escaped and migrated over the years to all 4 directions, but the ones captured by Assyria, were placed north of Assyria to buffer the border. All those areas caucasians were known to come from. They went North, East, and west from there everyone assumes.

[@cynthiajohnson9412]

Doesn't sound very scientific to pass everything off as observational prejudice. The dismissal is about as scientific as observational prejudice itself. It's like saying I'm not capable of any level of objectivity, so you're not capable of any level of objectivity either. Maybe, or maybe not.

[@bindaredundat-uv6wz]

stop with you nonsense !!

[@abutorab2914]

Stan was a lier.. where are these white tribes now!! In those days in was easier to get funding by lieing 👍

[@paulcampbell840]

Quite possible that there would be no trace of ancient white africans. We know what has happened to many albino africans in their recent history.

[@yardfowl3149]

@@abutorab2914 as you say that consider the rest of the lies you have been taught that were spread under the same principal. Offer proof of your claim or remain seated.

[@orlamcmanus9019]

He probably never heard of the thousands of years of back migrations, Stan didn't either but he was slightly more on thr money noting admixture, but wrong to pass it off as "white" should have said Eurasian lol

[@mtlicq]

"Victoria is the ultimate source of de Nile" - Victoria's Secret

[@sippndipp]

Lol

[@kellyhall7373]

Us guys know that secret.

[@pickettywitchoriginal]

Cleopatra‘s favourite store

[@Nino_Row]

3:37

[@Nino_Row]

3:37

[@raimundomuthemba766]

Great talk. Sadly the effects of this are still present in Africa today but we are waking up to that fact and working towards change.

[@BrianStone0]

Close your eyes and imaging Owen Wilson is giving this talk

[@papadopp3870]

That is almost the funniest thing I have experienced. Hard to believe it isn't OW!

[@erins.5420]

Brian Stone I can't stop hearing Owen Wilson now!

[@norml.hugh-mann]

Erin S. hahaha so true!!!

[@noph785]

now im imagining owen giving a speech to ben stiller

[@ebkdeviousd3392]

lol

[@susanaldridge2000]

By undermining Sasquatch searchers, he loses my respect

[@mirba6933]

You are completely right. Never mind what i think about certain topic!

[@bcguitarteacher7328]

Yet we still haven't found it or proven it. Imagine of these people were actually being tricked for decades. Ouch, that's got to hurt.

[@lilas8217]

by underminding the mentally ill?

[@mirba6933]

@@lilas8217 Exactly

[@TGIM]

Wow, I learned something today. Thank you. I am of Rwandan descent and during the genocide, Hutus referred to Tutsis as Ethiopians or Nilotics. Even though genetically it has never been proven, the history that was tought to us and passed from previous generation is the Hemetic theory due to colonialism and people believe it to this day.

[@suppernova1184]

Hametic is a myth but Tutsi are mixed Ethiopian ,nilotic and Bantu (just like many hutus due to intermarriage) ...im Somalian and i believe Tutsi arrived to Rwanda from east Africa (no idea where exactly ) Rwandan people look very similar to Masai tribe in Kenya (they are half Ethiopian) and i notice many of you look like our people i even saw your president family and they look from horn of Africa but they are taller off course

[@r13hd22]

Umm, it has been proven genetically...both via DNA and via cranial measurements, the thing the speaker conveniently left out so his opinion makes sense.

[@かんぐちあき]

Miseducation is so sad...

[@MandeepSingh-bv2zw]

84JLane thats exactly why one must never forget his roots. If d next generation is not taught the history of their forefathers, they will be susceptible to believe anything and everything that is taught to them as history, including propoganda.

[@ghettoyouthkatakyni7843]

84JLane you need to wake up they are just trying to graft albino to them

[@atilathesonofdanubius4277]

Very insightful information. I'd like to add that there are ancient tribes in Africa that were light skin resembling more Asiatic people, and it didn't have anything to do with white people, but perhaps positioning of how far from the equator they were. Also, you have to take into consideration the military movement from the west of Europe into those places. There are deserters or others that for some reason decide to switch or stay with the opposition, it happens more frequently than not. Americans staying in Vietnam after the conflict, buffalo soldiers switching sides in the conflict in the Philippines and on and on.

[@kamion53]

it is remarkeble that the Khoisan of Southern Africa, actually genetic the oldest people in Africa, were never connected to the Hamitics in spite of being lighter skinned than the Bantu people.

[@monnieeeeyt7037]

Those light skinned people are Khoisan people. Asians look like them. The Khoisan was here first and they are genetically linked to the Khoisan

[@Tuppence1966]

Yes . Transkei coast where Mandela came from . Clearly Chinese genetics . Lots of Chinese pottery etc found there

[@Sam-df9rs]

Deserters & those who switch sides do not happen more times than not. It happens more than we would assume, but there is not more soldiers deserting & switching sides during conflict than sticking to their side.

[@shells500tutubo]

@@Tuppence1966 Excpt the people are not even remotely connected to Chinese people through DNA.

[@hazzajonesmusic27]

Was interesting to see that first map with the stars on it, there is a star in New Zealands North Island. There were pale-skinned tribes (as well as very dark-skinned tribes, ie: Mori Ori) in New Zealand Aotearoa before the Melanesian and Polynesian people immigrated here 1200 years ago. Pale with ginger hair, many are still around, and many Maori have surprising red hair. 3 tribes with these features were Ngati Hotu, Ngati Ruakopiri and Ngati Kurapoto, all living near Lake Taupo, the largest lake in the Pacific.

[@theroidragedtrex7908]

Youre kidding? Thank you for the info

[@ottodidakt3069]

3 pre Polynesian tribes ? I thought there where only 1. Thanx for the info !

[@Bliind]

Facts, go back farther tho. That’s still too early in history. Both tribes have sort of voyages in there history

[@yoza359]

New zealander here, im pretty sure we found chinese relics dated back to 457 ad in nz

[@kamion53]

could there be a difference in traditional dieet between the dark and the light skinned Maori? When the dark skinned have a dieet that contains enough vitamine D, becoming light skinned has no benefit. When a dieet creates a vit D deficite, becoming light skinned increased the amount of vitamin D obtained through sunlight.

[@Adam-bq2vw]

Let me save you all some time. He's saying not to be racist. You're welcome.

[@airliadazen9495]

Adam 1,

[@Adam-bq2vw]

Might Is Right Why do you say that?

[@Adam-bq2vw]

Might Is Right Why do we need different colors?

[@Adam-bq2vw]

Might Is Right Did you ever think that if your philosophy was more solid, you wouldn't need to get ugly to defend it? I was more than willing to give you that opportunity, and was hoping we'd have an intelligent conversation. Generally, the only people who respond your way are those who feel threatened.

[@jamesjones4396]

he's a troll account

[@dragmaplays-new9811]

70% of the comments: "Guys, this man is explaining history and a theory that existed, not his personal views or opinions." 20% of the comments: The guys that the above people were talking to. ~10% of the comments: Everything else. ~0.024% of the comments: This comment.

[@jamesblunt006]

@Joe Me Yes they do. ~10% could be 9.976%.

[@jamesblunt006]

@Joe Me Yes they do. ~10% could be 9.976%.

[@jamesblunt006]

@Joe Me Yes they do. ~10% could be 9.976%.

[@SodiumInteresting]

@@jamesblunt006 but why?

[@lathentrigg9066]

Well I simply thought mountainous is in the clouds and cold .No need for melonin.And Glacier on top.And some I won't mantion about Noa.

[@waltdill927]

As a good rule: Explanatory theory does not describe; descriptive theory does not explain. But, really, theories work not because they are irrefutable -- they work because they are a best "fit" for reality confirmation, and what is real here is just about anything that is fairly predictable.

[@Dingbobber]

Every scientific discovery and theorem is refutable. That’s the nature of science as a system of belief. There was a point in time where even scientists believed that the earth was flat and women couldn’t board trains due to how their ovaries were theorized to fly out of their bodies at “great speeds” (over 40 MPH). Those were irrefutable facts, the “best fit” for people who were uncomfortable thinking that what they knew could be wrong.

[@horustrismegistus1017]

You're a brainrot slime using hueristics and pompously trumpeting it, to feel smart.. and it's because you think you're using logic, need validation, and can't tell logic from hueristics. Go save someone's life for cnn and act selfless. Turn it up.

[@waltdill927]

@@horustrismegistus1017 Don't comment if you do not understand the subject, Horus.

[@watcher805]

We need explanatory descriptions of descriptive explanations. Also, don't tell other people what to do unless you're willing to force them. You don't know what he understands

[@waltdill927]

Theory explains the phenomenal. Laws describe the cause (force). Descriptions explain nothing. (related: Cartesian Dualism.) Specifically: Phenomena are "moments", describable, but not "caused" by anything: think of an adequate and complete "description" of why, how gravity "works " the way it does. The Newtonian explanation (a modeling of theory) works; it works so well that it has become a mathematical (deductive) "law". But "laws" on this order have nothing to do with inductive reasoning or predictive value. Such "laws" do not contribute to an explanation of what can be reasonably described. They are laws since, while a matter of "best fit" for reality testing (consensus), they are outside the scope of "refutation" -- for the time being, of course. ----Circular argument adds nothing. ...besides, it's only a generalization. (I should have said "law" and not "theory" respecting description, however. My apologies. Laws are just "massively confirmed" theory, after all.) @@watcher805

[@FunnyShorts-lg6ri]

What he doesn't clarify until the very end of the video is that these supposed 'white tribes' didn't even look remotely 'white', they were just a little different from the locals, the Ainu being a perfect example.

[@PatrickSullivan-6462266133]

Ainu are caucasoid!

[@homebrandrules]

Patrick Sullivan INNAKULU(AINU GREETING) THEMS IS NOT CAUCASOID THEMS IS PARANOID

[@levsagan9902]

they came from Russia but plenty Ainu are clearly Asian.

[@davidmackie8552]

Agreed

[@texasray5237]

I lived in Hokkaido for years and visited Ainu areas and the Ainu are certainly very different physically, culturally, and linguistically from the Japanese. But they are not white, not European, not Caucasian, etc.

[@johnmcnulty4425]

Don't forget how the Vikings travelled very far.

[@jacobhall7718]

Northern Eurasian People’s, who were partial ancestors of the Indo Europeans had the same genes for blonde hair. People always say “Vikings Vikings Vikings”, the Vikings were active 1000 years ago, the Ancestors of those Inuits that gave them blonde hair would’ve happened 10,000-20,000 years ago maybe more.

[@VikingMuayThai]

Yamnyan Chariot Chads

[@nathan-jh2ku]

"Sail our ships to new lands, fight the horde" led Zeppelin

[@salingstuff8085]

Yes but not biblical or ancient it was within the past 6k years of the birth of the white race

[@dustingilger8258]

But Leif Eriksson was the first recorded to discover Canada, and norsemen were known to leave behind small settlements. Wouldn't that also be a viable source of blond hair?

[@trashpanda7859]

Fyi this is a informational video. He's offering context. Not something to take offense over. To which, based on the comments and dislikes... Over half seem to be entirely missing the context and unable to listen outside their own.

[@ingeleonora-denouden6222]

Exactly.... they react like Mr. Magoo !

[@trashpanda7859]

@HEREWARD THE WAKE *context not content.

[@modrikisadopted6337]

@@ingeleonora-denouden6222 Garo learn about Mr magooo

[@MusicSounds4041]

WOW I learned so much in this video. I have heard about this more and more the last 6 months!! I'm so glad that the truth is starting to come out and I'm here for it!!

[@LJSims-ob3dv]

There could’ve been albinos on that mountain 😂 all speculation

[@victorwar5619]

Do your own research. This guy is bending true history to fit today's political correctness. Not all humans originated from Africa. These whites make me sick.

[@angelab4652]

I guess humans have been explorers for far longer than they taught me in school

[@ricardouribe4173]

How long was that?

[@brianbishop9905]

Sweet cross. So right about 6K, I reckon?

[@beckyboop3517]

Indeed they were. There are many videos on here about ancient civilisations and out of place artifacts. all mind blowing stuff. School and the rest of it have got it all wrong, science is proving that. Try looking at Gregg Braden and Graham Hancock.

[@Smason432]

@@beckyboop3517 graham handcock is a little bit too cringe 😬

[@beckyboop3517]

@@Smason432 oh i do like him.

[@indigenousrugbyleaguei.r.l8764]

I think people are confused because this looks like a lecture but it's only an ad for his book.

[@reddwing4368]

That's what half of KZbin vids are someone promoting Themselves and their art

[@thewhopper411]

I'm not white...I study ancient writings and various cultures do indeed talk about these whites tribes. In North and South America, these white tribes have red hair. Elongated skulls are found all around the world near megalithic stone sites, if they still have hair it's usually blond to reddish hair. In very ancient Indian texts they talk about white tribes.

[@mikuspalmis]

A non-biased rarity you are. Thank you.

[@stoppernz229]

We definatrly existed.

[@stoppernz229]

Nice condescending white man comment Mikus , you sure put him in his place didnt ya.

[@spjr99]

@@stoppernz229 LOL. non whites were in the americas 130000 years ago

[@ODaughterofZionMinistries]

They’re nephalim

[@mikemalo6336]

There are totally obvious differences between the peoples of Africa along the eastern coast from yemen to ethiopia, each country has a characteristic look. Also the tribes of central africa around the congo have very different body shapes along with the facial differences of the east coast.

[@oranebrown2169]

Yes this known Kenyan look different from Ethiopian, Ethiopian breed with neanderthals, Kenyan genes is pure it will serve them well.

[@mikemalo6336]

@@oranebrown2169 aren't you cheerful.

[@oranebrown2169]

@@mikemalo6336 I tell no lies, east African and inhabitants of the Swahili, are mix breed

[@skp8748]

@@oranebrown2169 were the original people. The j haplogroup that Niger Congo people have is new. Science doesn't care about your silly theories

[@NoToBigBro]

@@oranebrown2169 "Kenyan genes is pure..." Pure what? Don't you know that a mutt (dog) is much healthier than a purebred, which is plagued with all kinds of defects and disease?

[@Javajoinjun]

"For those of you who aren't old enough to remember Mr. Magoo, here's an even older and less popular example you won't get either."

[@HeavyJEdgar]

true

[@righteousred723]

Kek

[@Tubulous123]

"Who is Don Quixote" lol - nice:)

[@frankm4243]

There is a greater theory which is ALMOST NEVER DISCUSSED, the stupidity of people commenting before watching a TEDTALK video. It's called El Stupido!

[@jamesnelson3491]

Frank M that theory came from the white tribe of Africa that migrated to Spain which brought Spanish to Mexico your name" ""el stupido""" proves the white tribe of Africa seriously.... now go collect your Nobel Prize you brilliant genius LMAO!!!

[@kathleennorton6108]

@@StellaLovesMusic25 He talks smart, but really doesn't seem to say much.

[@followme8238]

Brilliant! Well said!

[@rickh3714]

Why some people 'resent' University and academics. The idea that someone would have the temerity to explore others ideas and theories critically and for the audience to be expected to have the presumed intelligence to understand that an exploration of a proposition is not in itself an endorsement. That even a critique might not necessarily throw a complete idea out. That a summation may be very different to the early stages of a lecture. That you might actually sometimes see two sides to an argument. Or possibly see an argument develop for one side in one situation and the other in another. Don't jump the gun folks. Hear the guy out!

[@ExploreYourWorld-oo3jd]

@@rickh3714 that was pretty deep sir. As such I pose to you this.. The so-called public education recieved by the sheeple, which was actually an indoctrination into a false belief system, has blinded them to our true reality. Nobody questions or objectively investigates Anything anymore! No independent or critical thought. You seem different so, I challenge you sir to objectively investigate the world in which you live. Test your percieved knowledge to find out what's true and what you merely believed was true. Play devils advocate and try to prove the opposite viewpoint on everything you believe. Run experiments and observe. In 2012 I discovered some things so profound that it took me 10 months of research and experimentations to be sure of it. And even after that, it took 10 more months to fully accept what I had discovered. We have been purposely deceived! For example : 'space science' first of all 99% of space science is not measurable testable or repeatable. It's all theories, based on assumptions and a whole lot of conjecture. There's no stellar parallax. But NASA says 'yes there is, but only WE can measure it because of huge distances, yada yada'. Meanwhile the constellations haven't changed in 6 millenia and EVERY experiment performed in the history of mankind designed to prove the Earth was in motion.. FAILED to do so. Yep there's absolutely nothing your told about 'space' that's true. NOTHING. But don't take my word for it. Begin your journey of self challenging everything you think you know and put it all to the test. If your truly objective, you can see where it leads! It's not what I expected for sure. My only warning is, before you begin, be prepared for an enormous paradigm shift. It's becoming clear that there are only two types of people left in the world today.. The Lion's, who investigate fearlessly, regardless of where it may lead. Lions are open to rethinking Major Scientific Claims thought of as 'settled long ago' and open to new discoveries, experimentations, and finally.. explanations. And then theres.. The Sheep, who regurgitate what they were taught or told, without a shread of critical independent thought or investigation of the matter. 98% of what the Sheep think they know, is second or third hand information, at best! That makes little difference to the sheep, they will never question or investigate.. anything. Which are you sir? I challenge you to be the Lion! Get back to me in 12 months!

[@KagisoMutlaneng]

Finally someone has articulated it so well, that maybe those who thought they didn't believe it, will finally click. The Hamitic race theory (and remnants of it), as well as racial clustering have been such an issue, and so normalized, that even a whole South African political opposition leader went public Tweeting these beliefs on Twitter, and reiterated them when reprimanded. When Dr Diop said it, he was a madman and Afrocentrist, decades later we are here :)

[@frankxx2364]

Or maybe he is full of cockamamie BS that you want to hear

[@KagisoMutlaneng]

@@frankxx2364 YT Channel with zero content and joined 2013... Definitely keep your day job, trolling isn't your calling!

[@jeanmorin3247]

We are progressing! We are progressing, my good man! When you suddenly understand that your eyesight is not as good as you believed it to be, you then realize that things are not what you see them to be. This creates a wide opening in the acceptation to be wrong. Accepting to be wrong is the most basic tenet of intellectual honesty, integrity and science. You have to actively seek ways in which you could possibly be wrong in what you see if you want to be honest. Mr Magoo becomes a telling allegory of what people naturally become without the help of a self-testing methods: erratic yet self-assured.

[@atenas80525]

Wouldn't DNA testing show whether or not the Hamitic hypothesis was viable?

[@antwi313]

The hamitic hypothesis is simply another white lie. Why waste time and resources proving what is already known. This book will help you understand. (African Origin of Civilization - The Myth or Reality) By: Cheikh Anta Diop

[@atenas80525]

@@antwi313 You did not answer my question - many folklores and myths have some measure of truth and fact to them - in the interest of knowledge, wouldn't that be worth looking into?

[@rhess10]

@@antwi313 that's a pretty awful suggestion. Science continues to change and the moment we think we know something, a new piece of tech gets invented or a hundred years go by and the theory we thought we knew no longer stands up. There are countless examples of this. Why would we "waste time" on what's already known? Because half of the time, we're wrong.

[@TropicalCrumpet]

What would be the goal or reason of Hamitic DNA testing?

[@080gina080]

The only way to truely map human migration using DNA is by testing archeological remains contemporary to the time your looking at. The challenge with that is reliable DNA which usually is greatly deteriorated or you only have some small parts of the remains that you simply can't get a reliable DNA result from. But there has been development in the area of this type of DNA testing. They are now revisiting archeological remains in storage around the world and using a small bone that exist in the inner ear. They've discovered that this small bone actually preserves very well and therefore the DNA. Their findings are already causing some new information that might alter our preconceived assumptions of Polynesian migrations. Very interesting stuff. And possibly in northern Europe a period of East to West migration instead of the west to east. It's an area to watch.

[@somesweetguy]

"There are no white people on top of that mountain, man." -- absolutely hilarious.

[@DrJones-nh4my]

Sweet How did you get your icon to be white? Or is it empty?

[@GrapheneOxideIsInCVVax]

@@DrJones-nh4my I imagine you can just take a screenshot of your screen and set your picture to a zoomed in section of the empty white space that is available.

[@user-mq6qv6bi2g]

Africa was settled by white people before Bantu/blacks expansion.

[@TheStarGardian]

Actually there are only two kinds of people in this WORLD. *AFRICANS AND DESCENDANTS OF AFRICANS*

[@TheStarGardian]

@greyhaze ind please tell me you don't believe in those little fairies known as LEPRECHAUNS. *SPEAKING OF OUT OF AFRICA* *IN HONOR OF SAINT PATRICK'S DAY WHICH I'M SURE YOU CELEBRATE* PLEASE GOOGLE : *WEE TWA OF IRELAND*

[@nazgulkardar1235]

Michael Robinson explains the mindset of European explorers in the 18th and 19th centuries who saw the world from the perspective of Bible and racism.

[@mellowrage4892]

Does the Bible promote racism?

[@jojo18eighteen69]

@@mellowrage4892 i wondered the same thing

[@atrichardable]

@@mellowrage4892 it does it put Jews over other people , it says that certain people of a certain linage are cursed , the Bible is a book written during different time period with certain views

[@thesetruths1404]

Hollow Earth. The mighty governments prevent the north and south poles from being explored. I find that interesting. Furthermore, many discoveries and accounts of strange experiences around both.

[@sjules6596]

Great talk... But you were wrong when you said the Rwandan batutsis believed they originated outside Africa. It was the government that wanted to back up their genocidal regime against the batutsis by de-nationalizing them and calling them outsiders. The batutsis never claimed to be from elsewhere besides Rwanda. And I think it's a big deal that you got that wrong.

[@lostpony4885]

I think he means the government. A few problems with his white lens here but hes trying.

[@mcgurupro]

He was explaining one of the "why's" the genocide took place. The hematite theory made it easier to assassinate the batutsis by the government. He never said they came from outside Rwanda... he emphasizes the belive in this theory made Africans think that way thus justifying the killing.

[@mcgurupro]

@@lostpony4885 he is explaining a theory that exists and still to this day causes confusion on the understanding of africans civilizations. There is no white lens here.

[@michaelangeloevans2722]

@@mcgurupro s jules never said that Michael Robinson said that the batutsis came from outside Rwanda.

[@delenacarlson3288]

Maybe before getting so upset.. u should listen closely first and not jump to conclusions 🙄

[@danh7739]

No picture can capture how spectacular these monuments are up-close and in person They're stunning relics from a bygone era, but they're also mesmerising works of art. I saw them 40 years ago and I can still remember them as if I saw minutes ago.

[@Snow-bq6ny]

wtf are you referencing human beings as relics you saw 40 years ago?

[@jonathanslayton3112]

I agree in terms of the monuments. I presume you are talking about the pyramids picture he used as a reference point. Totally not what the lecture was about, but way to focus on 1 tiny thing mentioned in the video. But I agree. Much more spectacular in person I would imagine.

[@danh7739]

@@jonathanslayton3112 Happy New Year; I'm glad you presumed and didn't assume. Best of luck to ya'.

[@charlytaylor1748]

Dan, you seem to have broken some unwritten yt comments rule. I'm not entirely sure what you did wrong, but don't do it again or you'll get commented at.!

[@danh7739]

You show signs of being a genus; beware no good can come from it. Good luck and good riddance to all.

[@am6322]

Hyperborea more like Hyperbased and redpilled

[@fkssjs]

Fellow telegram user?

[@balaam_7087]

“Noah parks the ark on top of Mt Ararat” 🤣 “Shem! Japheth! If you two kids don’t knock it off back there I swear to God I’ll turn this ark around!”

[@JR6593]

Please, ladies and gentlemen, watch the video TILL THE END!

[@PatrickSullivan-6462266133]

Leftists don't do that, they just complain!

[@angelbelieves7496]

Can you provide a link? There's many videos with the same title. Thanks!

[@TheDevilbound]

Ha

[@texasray5237]

What fun is that? Much better to respond first to prove how intuitive you are.

[@transporterIII]

but that is defeats the whole reason to comment in the first place, haha!

[@villagenz]

If you are interested there is a documentary called Skeletons in The Closet from Aotearoa, New Zealand which is in a similar discovery shape.

[@munchyghecho1329]

thanks emma!

[@SiliconBong]

It was here on Tubes in the early two thousands, but seems to have been taken down/disappeared.

[@pappagallagher2227]

That was complete fraud

[@pappagallagher2227]

@@SiliconBong yeah because it was completely made up

[@SiliconBong]

@@pappagallagher2227 That's what they want you to believe :o

[@thecentralscrutinizerr]

As a little boy I walked into a shop in Wyoming with my dad. There inside was a wooden Indian holding cigars in one hand and his other placed above his eyebrows acting as a sunshade. I asked my dad about the Indian and he said, "That a Fugawi Indian". I said, "Fugawi"? I've never heard of that tribe. He said, "Well just look at him. He got his hand above stretched out above his eyes like a sun shade and is saying Where the Fugawi"?

[@user-jh8cx4jf7u]

😂

[@JNith]

Haha awesome story!

[@wooddoc5956]

Remember F-Troop?

[@southwestchannel6715]

From what i've seen, just about every great "explorer" had an indigenous guide of some sort that had already been there, took care of the the explorer and his team when they fell ill or got lost.

[@tubester4567]

The speaker ignores the possibility of white people being taken as slaves. The whole world has a history of slavery, we know white people were enslaved in Africa, Europe and Asia. Even if only 2 or 3 white women were taken, they could produce a small tribe of lighter skinned Africans in just a few years. Europeans could have even bartered a few poor white women, in exchange for other goods.

[@Omega0850]

Isn´t it great to be the very first to discover something?

[@devenbrown761]

Would love to hear his explanation for the Moors.

[@brucetucker4847]

Explanation for what about the Moors?

[@tomjeff1743]

Celts were great explorers.

[@brofessormex]

Yes they were and might have been the ancient Phoenician sailors too.

[@ottodidakt3069]

yes but except anything but tall blond. First Celtic peoples where actually fairy short dark skinned, tho some do carry red hair blue/green eyes inherited from neanderthal

[@trent5807]

A Fun Minigame: Find TED videos with a high amount of dislikes, and only using the top 10 comments, try to figure out which group of people is responsible.

[@ottley32]

So true

[@thekingofmoab1181]

Interesting idea

[@rattrap8819]

sMALL hATS?

[@slimtimes.l.l.c4081]

Let that sink in

[@FilliD1]

It really seems as a disease

[@wildmanz8233]

There are African people mentioned all the time in ancient literature: Memnon was an Ethiopian King who fought on the side of the Trojans in the Iliad. Ovid described Perseus winning the heart of Andromeda, who has an Ethiopian princess. People got around, socialized, married...

[@dancegregorydance6933]

Moses marries an Ethiopian woman after fleeing Egypt (the first time not after freeing the Israelites.)

[@simplyirrigation424]

I liked the speech. Just one thing I was wondering about. He spoke about the Hamitic Hypothesis a being a reason for whites to explore and conquer, and I as a white person, can't help but wondering if he was influenced by his modern day morals and social norms. Maybe modern day people would use that reason if they were to explore and conquer, but truthfully I don't see our ancestors needing a excuse to go and explore for more than curiosity, fame, glory and riches. They could, so they did. The nobility had little care for their own lowborn, so why would they have care for people who lived in even worse conditions than their poor.

[@LinuxLuddite]

It just reinforced their ambitions to 'conquer' the world because as they believed their ancestors did the same

[@emZee1994]

Totally agree

[@sbadaro]

On the off chance that the speaker is interested in reading commentary, I note that you cannot approach history and anthropology as "pure sciences" leading to conclusive and clean cut theories about human geneology and evolution. You need to either personally master both the shared "popular" knowledge (folklore) and the language of locale (or community) or to employ the sevice of those of the locale who may voluntarily or inadvertently present that knowledge to you. For example, as a young european-looking but Palestinian / arabic speaking student in Ohio , I recall being teased about being one of the ناس الحلبة "MILK PEOPLE" due to my fair complexion by a Sudanese friend from Madani in central Sudan. Turns out, that is a derogatory term among the tribes of central Sudan (Jaaliyyin الجعليين in this case) used not to describe an individual with fair complexion but to describe a specifically "white" community of circassian (Caucasian) origins settled in the region in Memluk times... You only need to look at current history and the population movements from the Middle East and Central America northwards to figure out that the history of human population is a fluid mass pretty much independent of geography and, over time, race and genetics.

[@claudiafahey1353]

It seems there is alot of judging by skin color and its not limited to "white" people, however you want to define white....the more we concern ourselves with skin color, the less we can relate as HUMAN, kwim?

[@thesonofdormammu5475]

All the dislikes from people who don't realize this is a history lesson and not this guy's personal views.

[@bryanfick6895]

Ok, but if this is a history lesson it is devoid of much of the history. What about the Ainu having european DNA? Why do the oldest mummies in Egypt have european features ie blonde/red hair, green/blue eyes? What about the red haired mummies in South America? Leilong Beauty and the Tarim mummies? I could go on. World history is much more complicated than many want us to think about. Some people are scared of the implications of the truth, so they won't report the full truth. That's unfortunate.

[@thesonofdormammu5475]

@@bryanfick6895 I think maybe you are misunderstanding the purpose of this TedTalk. This guy is presenting an old theory that people used to think was solid that has been disproven. There is obviously something interesting going on as far as global genetic dispersal, but that wasn't the point of this particular TedTalk. The items you bring up could be an entire series of TedTalks, this guy was just presenting one theory that people used to have. I agree that the current mainstream version of human history is not correct, I think we are far from understanding human history and it doesn't help that those who have made a career with the current theory hold the power.

[@bryanfick6895]

@@thesonofdormammu5475 His Mr Magoo hypothesis clearly states that he believes that europeans are seeing caucasian genetic influence where none exists bc they want to see it, out of a sense of racial loneliness or something to that extent, and then he fails to include the genetic evidence that is clearly available for all of the other cases I previously stated. You should rewatch, and if you find a point in the talk where he addresses these points, send me a minute/ second marker.

[@thesonofdormammu5475]

@@bryanfick6895 Bro, a 17 minute TedTalk about an old theory (and his new little theory), why are you even getting this involved in this? You and I both know he does not address the genetics of any of the people in the talk, stop being snarky and sarcastic. No one wants to genetically test all of the different peoples of the world because they want to stick to the mainstream theory of human evolution, regardless of evidence that contradicts it. You and I are on the same page here, stop coming at me. Have a good day.

[@bryanfick6895]

@@thesonofdormammu5475 so you cant find a single portion of his talk that supports your position, so you want me to drop it. Got it, maybe you shouldn't comment on other people if you don't have the evidence to support your position.

[@MrShbbz]

What an archaic late-scholastic lecture, lieber gott. Its incredible how "american" or "english"-centric this is. In 19th century there was no debate about where the people come from, the biblical-scholastic ideas were by far gone, atleast in continental Europe.

[@kayleighllyn8253]

People travelling ever since walking.. nothing weird about that🤷‍♀️ We are simply an inventive and curious species, always looking for greener pastures

[@clownslapper5270]

Name something invented in Afrika.

[@Hirohito_iLoveYou]

@@clownslapper5270 the oldest known artwork in human history was discovered in Blombos Cave in South Africa & stone-age ancestors in sub-saharan Africa were the first human species to develop a language system. A recent scientific study found that every language in the world can be traced to the dialect spoken by our African ancestors over 100,000 years ago...also mining and metallurgy, Africans began smelting iron over 2,500 years ago. Ancient Tanzanians had been producing carbon steel long before Britain industrialized metallurgy....there’s plenty more too if you’re interested 👍

[@hinuhinan2434]

@@Hirohito_iLoveYou haha. Funny thing is that there's even more. People think all that matters is the last 200 years😂.

[@neiltingzon]

It seems, europeans seemed to do all the "walking" as of late. Australia, USA, South Africa, India, Hong Kong, Canada to name a few.

[@Hirohito_iLoveYou]

@@hinuhinan2434 oh yeah there’s a LOT more, just named some pretty basic things.

[@thebrocialist8300]

The truth is much more complex. Africa is indeed the most diverse continent on the plant and part of the reason is because of its long history of discourse with diverse populations. The differences these Europeans were observing were perhaps reflections of a distorted colonial lease. But they were also partially objective interpretations of physical differences that were rooted in that diverse history. In European countries like Spain this becomes apparent - in observing the more Nordic looking peoples (likely reflecting the Iberia’s history with Celtic settlement, Germanic - e.g. Suebic, Vandalic, and Visigothic - migration/conquest) and more Mediterranean looking people (reflecting Iberia’s history with Greek and Phoenician traders, Rome’s imperial annexation, Punic settlement, and period under Umayyad and Islamic control). To a lesser extent, it’s visible amongst Anglo-Brits, Germans and even Slavs and Scandinavians. There is diversity there reflecting other forms of settlement and migration (much taking place as far back as the Neolithic and Bronze Age). For example the earliest inhabitants of Briton - those who built megalithic structures like Stone Henge - were in fact Neolithic Mediterranean agriculturalists (with features like dark hair, eyes, light skin, short stature and genetics that show stronger parity with modern Iberians and French than modern Britons). Subsequent migration from settlers originating in the Eurasian Steppe replaced as much as 90% of the population - resulting in a modest continuity of the former Mediterranean ancestry. It’s nevertheless still a diverse component that is still anatomically present in Britons. (That’s not including subsequent impacts from Saxons, Norse, or Gallo-Celts). We now understand that our very species is the result of admixture between very evolutionarily distinct archaic hominid groups - e.g. Neanderthals, Denisovans, and our Cro-Magnon ancestors). DNA is making this all very clear. I do appalled this man’s work and the value of his sociological theory, however.

[@kleinjahr]

Interesting idea, though probably incorrect. Humans have been migrating, conquering and trading for most of our existence. Consider Heyerdahl's hypothesis about diffusion. He proved it was possible that primitive man crossed oceans,with Kon Tiki and the Ra expeditions, but he did not prove that it happened. Consider Clovis points, which are remarkably similar to Solutrean points. If I remember correctly some years ago a site was found, in northwest China, where the skeletons had red hair and apparently Celtic or proto-Celtic artifacts. These anomalies all point to the fact that primitive man was much more traveled than previously thought.

[@spiritualknight704]

How come there’s no pictures of these so called wyt tribes

[@kleinjahr]

@@spiritualknight704 Because they had no cameras.

[@wolcottwu756]

Would be interesting to understand the extent to which Hamitic attitudes have fostered the legacy of slavery among Africans that continues to be pervasive today. Furthermore, were those that captured individuals and sold them as slaves to Arabs and Europeans of lighter skin than their victims?

[@cosmicHalArizona]

I theorize in my head, frequently, about humanoid racial origins & migration. Really fascinating subject.

[@balderii7340]

What have you come up with so far?

[@ranevc]

Nothing

[@mightymouse1111]

I dont think I really have extraterrestrial origins but the rh-negative theory is a fun rabbit hole

[@dexterabend8945]

@@mightymouse1111 We came from a nordic alien race

[@mightymouse1111]

@@dexterabend8945 aaaaaaah, last I heard it was a basque alien race...

[@davido3028]

I bought a ranch in Northern NM and the village near the ranch was supposedly occupied by 'white haired folks' when the Spanish arrived there in the early days. The locals still talk about them... but supposedly they 'left' shortly after the Spanish arrived. This would all be easy to dismiss except that the village's name means 'white hair'.

[@a.i.gorerithmit456]

Maybe it was a retirement community?

[@bruceh4833]

@@a.i.gorerithmit456 Just like the nursing home folks "left" after getting boosted.

[@melinda6024]

when the English arrived on the Virginian coast in the 1700's, they encountered fair blue-eyed native peoples. so, did you know the Vikings visited these lands of course bringing their DNA with them starting about the year 1000? Also, English slavers raided the east coast and captured native people,took them to Europe and other places as slaves... this is why the pilgrims were met by an english speaking Indian named Squanto who helped them in 1620 in Virginia. Know this, ancient people traveled everywhere and spread the DNA everywhere !!!

[@ILYF22]

I won't comment on the rest of your post but Squanto learned english and 3 other languages when he took a job on a whaler.

[@brucetucker4847]

The English arrived on the Virginia coast in the 1500s, not the 1700s, and when they established the first long-term successful colony at Jamestown in 1607 they encountered fair blue-eyed people who were descended from survivors from a previous unsuccessful colony in what is now North Carolina who were assimilated into Native American society when the colony collapsed.

[@bluerose3385]

The book, the 7 Daughters of Eve, always fascinated me as well. It starts to make sense.

[@gedreillyhomestead6926]

No mention of earlier Viking explorations or settlements?

[@BrightSeaStar]

That definitely seems like a possibility. They DID get around.

[@Flat_Earth_101]

Has this guy done any in depth research on Admiral Byrd and where can I find it?

[@somas09]

When we all have perfect knowledge, then we'll know why people look the way they look and how they got to where they are. Until then, we are all Mr. Magoo, at some level, on just about everything. We all believe that OUR perspective is THE right perspective on "X" topic. (And, yes, I believe MY perspective on perspectives is THE right perspective. Ironic, isn't it?) Still, Michael has put together a working hypothesis - good for him. Now, it's a matter of investigating and gathering data. It's interesting to travel the paths which intellectual curiosity leads us to. As long as the hypothesis continues to develop to account for the data, we'll continue to be interested.

[@waynemyers2469]

Bravo, you are logical AND clever...

[@ernieb820]

The truth is humans are hybrid homosapians and different races and different hybrids. Life is far more complex and our time on this earth isn't linear

[@than217]

I was thinking this video was going to be some weird Biblical migration rant since it seemed like the speaker was agreeing the theories he was describing but he definitely brought it full circle by the end of the video. I'm glad I watched the whole thing before shutting off and assuming his point.

[@nemonemo3898]

@@Rogue.Rider0 🤣😂😂 VANCE ITS CRAZY AIN'T IT🤦🤣😂

[@ulalaFrugilega]

S. Vance so you disagree with Darwin, Sir?

[@nemonemo3898]

@@ulalaFrugilega absolutely unequivocally disagree,,👍.. Darwin is a sham on history

[@stephenjones9746]

@@nemonemo3898 Darwin was a religious man, his theory was based on his observations. You don't support his ideas, but science does.

[@nemonemo3898]

@@stephenjones9746 yes he was a religious man. Darwinism has been disproven many many times over.. you should probably get up-to-date

[@zeshanbasaran5780]

Why was Graham Hancock's talk banned, yet this one isn't?

[@angrytedtalks]

Because Graham Hancock is a journalist, not a scientist.

[@frankleblanc8730]

I find Hancock is very good at raising important questions but is not very good at answering them himself.

[@davidgalloway266]

Why do you want it banned?

[@locknessmedia3585]

@@frankleblanc8730 they are answering themselves with all the recent discoveries

[@brucetucker4847]

@@locknessmedia3585 They are, and the answer in every case is that Hancock is as wrong as it is possible to be.

[@Diniecita]

This is why when I travel I dont have expectations. I find that I enjoy it so much more that way. I do always try to learn some of their language though. I fond it helps people connect with me more. (Although in Iceland they laughed at me. But, they appreciated that I tried.)

[@davidmedley6232]

What do we do as online instructors who have no control over our curriculum? We know that they've constructed to the middle but don't have the time to rewrite an entire set of resources! Shouldn't they be the ones watching this video?

[@saunleecoetzee9170]

Links in to the Prester John myth? Egypt was African, Mediterranean groups mixed in later.

[@Tetzukai]

I wouldn't say that in some cases. North Africans and Southern Europeans could have a more common ancestor thousands of years back before the notion of major racial classes exist or were distinctive, where one group became more European while the other became more African overtime.

[@Greyhawkwar]

Dna says you are wrong.

[@TheRealBaxterslideralus]

beware the mouthpieces of the system, live, love, and take a chance

[@Napthalicious]

@15:45- when he says "the human species', he's nailing it down. I've been thinking about that a bit lately. Concerning skin color there's only one race, the human one; 'race' in this context means a sort of production series, as say a machinist might produce a 'run' or 'lot' of a certain type of part. When we say 'race', what we really mean is 'breed', like dogs. We are all variations of a specific type, mandated by the human genome. Biological organism, I? Aye. The fundamental flaw of humanity is that we fail to recognize ourselves as a species. I've never met anyone in my life who said "Hi, my name is Bob, and I'm a Hominid." We are not descended from apes, we ARE apes. Semi-sapient Simian apes for whom 2020 is but the beginning of nature's reckoning with our monkey-ish antics. You think this year is bad? Wait til' 2050 gets here! Ever seen Road Warrior or Book of Eli? Yeah? It's gonna be far worse than that...

[@truemanrep3267]

hu-man =colored man . isn't it ironic? like the snobbishly rich land owners called their chattel human and called themselves "man" or "woman"

[@arandomoctopus2532]

@@truemanrep3267 Pfft, what is this? This is not etymologically accurate at all. The modern English word human derives from the Latin word "humanus", meaning human, which itself comes from the word "humus", which literally means earth or soil. This has absolutely nothing to do with any similarities to the word "hue."

[@truemanrep3267]

@@arandomoctopus2532 yes very good. but there is a group of assholes that see it the way I said it.

[@honoriswithin]

We, as modern humans, are a hybrid of different ancient humans but today's races are equal in those amounts. Each share Cromagnon and particular asians have more Neanderthal than others. But as far as Sub Saharan African, their DNA harbours another archaic genome no other do and guess what....the out if Africa theory is wrong. DNA is destroying all of the PC narratives, give it time. Every missing link has eventually been exposed as a hoax too even after decades, Lucy is next.

[@NecroLiquor.]

I’ve watched this so many times because I love the Mr Magoo reference!!

[@LivingstonLabs]

This is a wholly unsatisfying theory, this Mr Magoo hypothesis. So we have lots of mysterious recorded instances of white and blonde tribes around the world... and he decides, well all these explorers had perception problems, like some pseudopsych babble to dismiss all these things. Just be comfortable saying that you don't really know.

[@Raydensheraj]

Hypothesis would fit the description better...indeed.

[@302big5]

@@Raydensheraj That whites are more advanced and have been invading countries throughout all of time after the flood ... yeah okay.

[@Raydensheraj]

@@302big5 a hypothesis is a idea without evidence...still in need to be tested. There was no flood.

[@TedRader]

A plausible hypothesis for the blonde Inuit: Viking interbreeding with the native population. Vikings were renowned explorers, landing on North American shores well before Columbus. Russians came to Alaska at least as early as the 1600's, interbreeding with the local Yupik (one of the many ethnicities of what most of you would call "Eskimo") population. The "new race" is called "Aleut" today. Google Image "Aleut" and you will see a mixture of Alaska Native and Eastern European features.

[@ajrwilde14]

sea-faring Vikings came from West-coast of Norway/Denmark, there the people have brown/red hair, blonde hair is found closer inland towards the Baltic region

[@ajrwilde14]

it probably has something to do with snow since Baltic areas have a lot of snow and so does Inuit territory

[@bmanwells4200]

An interesting talk.. I suggest that everyone listen to the entire talk before forming an opinion of it ..

[@rexluminus9867]

That's right. In some county they say he or she is beating his or her saliva.

[@ghostrider369]

Humanity has been here for 450,000+ years.

[@gerardogalvez2371]

He's right about one thing, it is a story

[@jamespilbeam209]

Geeze, who in the world cares about him and his book? His mother?

[@istantinoplebullconsta642]

A sad silly story. And how many have died and still do bc of this sad, silly story.

[@yelyab1]

Several years ago CBC (Canada) did a special on a group of Inuit people who played string and percussion instruments with melodies much like Irish much that has existed foe centuries. They brought the two groups together and each group play a few of their favorite tunes. Then as all good musicians do they were invited to “JAM” together. It took about no time time to play as if they had played together for years and as if they had learned the same type of music from their families. Their music was not was not a borrowed art form like “rock and rock”. Their wasn’t any genetic connection, there wasn’t any ancient trading paths that crossed centuries before. The show ended with a question mark. They didn’t have an answer. It probably shows the deficiencies in our knowledge of how our civilizations evolved. I’m 73. I never learned in public education (K-12,+ BSME) that our current culture is possibly the 6th culture to occupy the earth. Spooky stuff eh? I like it. Blame global warming on the Cro-Magnon, burning all that as of yet to be fossil fuels in inefficient furnaces, or the guys that came from Mars to South Africa, enslaved the human beings to mine minerals, found them to be unmanageable after two or three generations (what took so long) then left . “Well Stanley this is another fine mess you got me into.” Standard line from Oliver Hardy to Stan Laurel of Laurel & Hardy.

[@waynemyers2469]

Mr. Bayley, I love you...

[@blazingstar9638]

Woah

[@PuerRidcully]

Prehistoric peasants didn't cause global warming. Neither are we. Probably. Earth climate shifts in cycles, which tends to erase civilizations.

[@Blalack77]

damn...that was an eloquent breakdown of mr. magoo... this guy has a way with words.

[@bigpanda307]

LOL

[@Barutokun]

The mr. Magoo hypothesis, otherwise known as confirmation bias

[@uppitywhiteman6797]

But Mr. Magoo is a great analogy

[@timouellette4693]

Bottom line the mainstream history most of us have been taught has many voids throughout. Very interesting Ted Talk many thanks. Also,Mt Ararat in Turkey has a wooden boat very high up on it’s flank. There’s even an exit on the HWY mentioning ‘the Ark’. National Geographic went up to explore the remains of the boat in the late 80’s I believe in was 1987. Now Turkey has closed off any further exploration on the mountain.