*update* Massive Thanks to youtube user '@sl1ckk1ll3r' who spotted how I was hitting that odd bottleneck at the 08:05 mark. In my haste, I didn't spot that the adapter is mounted on a M.2 SATA bridge - which is a 6GB/s bottleneck. Still investigating how AJA/ATTO hit 1GB without caching over smb, but massive props to them for @sl1ckk1ll3r for catching on the board.
@mrbiffo67296 ай бұрын
The 6Gb/s limitation would only be an issue if it was an actual SATA connection to the controller. As it is, it's PCIe (x1 or x2) going across the connector from the carrier board. Depending on if the link is training at Gen 3 or Gen 4, there could be a bottleneck since a Gen 3 x1 link maxes out at ~8Gb/s. Everything else should have enough bandwidth to not be a bottleneck, assuming that there's no signal integrity issues causing other problems. That said, thanks for the review! I had no idea that you could get super fast USB Ethernet adapters nowadays.
@Johnwhodunit6 ай бұрын
I'm not sure how that's the case. I have two of these adapters that I use with an Intel Mac Mini and M1 Studio and get full wire speeds with it connecting to a Ugreen 6800 Pro running TrueNAS Scale. The Macs have integrated 10 Gbe ports so I use them with these adapter to do SMB MultiChannel connections to a single drive NVMe pool (tried with both Gen 4x4 and Gen 3x2) to the dual 10 Gbe ports on the 6800. Timed transfers of a large (100GB) file reliably clocked around 2,000 MB/s which would be impossible if it was only capable of 600 MB/s. It's something in the specifics of your setup as the adapter must have at least a Gen 3x2 link
@Yiveytube6 ай бұрын
@@Johnwhodunit+1 on that! I just got mine a few days ago and it has no problem saturating the 10GbE link when I connect my iMac. Perhaps the controller works better when using TB instead of USB?
@gibsonblogger6 ай бұрын
This device has a M.2 key type of "B+M" which has 2 PCIe lanes which is what the AQC113 has. Also, this is a Thunderbolt 3 device, not USB4. The Thunderbolt controller is the IC marked JHL6240 on the back of the M.2 carrier. A host's USB4 ports must support the Thunderbolt 3 compatibility option to use this.
@mrbiffo67296 ай бұрын
@@gibsonblogger thanks for the research! In that case, it's a PCIe 3.0 connection and hopefully the link is training to be x2 wide.
@kevbo27506 ай бұрын
Glad to see 10GbE getting more affordable. Do I need 10GbE? No. Do I want it? YESSSSSS!
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
*hands you a box of Cat6e cables* that does it, now you have to smoke the whole pack!
@Vatharian6 ай бұрын
Why... why do you NOT need 10 Gb/s? How people live with 100 or 200 MB/s of GbE I do not know, when typical project total file size of -whatever- is often several hundred GB or TB? There are mechanical hard drives that are close to filling 10G link. To add insult to injury, 10 Gig Ethernet is almost quarter a century old! The 1.0 spec was approved in 2001! We should all be rocking 10G NICs everywhere since 2010 at least.
@LordApophis1006 ай бұрын
Do you need an SSD or do you want to use an HDD as your main drive? You can get used 25 and 100GbE stuff for quite good prices. Being able to transfer files at 2 GB/s instead of 100 MB/s speeds things really up.
@eat.a.dick.google6 ай бұрын
@@nascompares Cat6a
@night_h4nter6 ай бұрын
@@Vatharian not everyone is a fucking video/raw photo editor. my heaviest project is less than 250 mbs, while my average ones are under .5 mb
@waynetaylor27846 ай бұрын
Note that the AQC113c has a design bug. Marvell issued a May 2022 notice that the 113c may fail to link up with PCIe during power on, reboot, or sleep/wake in many PCs. Marvel has consequently discontinued this part.
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing bud, greatly appreciate the extra input for me and everyone. Have a great weekend
@waynetaylor27846 ай бұрын
@@nascompares Aquantia was acquired by marvel btw
@fwiler6 ай бұрын
Unfortunately there's problems with just about every affordable 10Gb adapter out there, whether it's Mellanox (nvidia) or Intel. It highly depends on the system and the OS. I do not have any issue the a 113c I have or the AQC100. But I have run into issues with 113, x520, x540, x550, x710, cx3, cx4
@waynetaylor27846 ай бұрын
@@fwiler complete rubbish
@marcogenovesi85706 ай бұрын
@@fwiler sounds like the issue is your 10gbit switch, it's not normal to have pretty much all server brands barf out like that
@Yiveytube6 ай бұрын
Yes, just got mine unit of those the other day! Super happy with it! Payed $97 incl shipping. Works great with TB3 on my iMac. I like that it’s really a TB3/USB4 to M.2 inside so I’m going to order a M.2 to PCIe riser to try some other PCIe cards. I was sort of shocked when I found it, because it was so cheap, but found some other written reviews and took the plunge. Very happy!
@miksu1036 ай бұрын
I'm really excited about the new RTL8126 5Gbps adapters you can buy for around 20€. The RTL8157 should also bring 5Gbps with a USB 3.2 connection really soon. For the price difference 5Gbps may make more sense than 10Gbps for a lot of applications.
@levifig6 ай бұрын
Most folks need this type of adapter for their laptops, not their NAS’es!! If you need 10Gbps connectivity on your storage, you should be buying one with 10Gbps or PCIe expansion. But this kind of adapter is a godsend for more affordable 10Gbps connectivity on CLIENT devices with limited or no PCIe expansion, like laptops and miniPCs!
@Trig0r6 ай бұрын
You should try pulling the m.2 card out of the enclosure and sticking it into an m.2 header directly on your board...
@Ultrajamz6 ай бұрын
*turns into skeleton waiting on new synology hardware
@DigitalBenny5 ай бұрын
Same ☠️
@slimstates6 ай бұрын
I actually love the seagulls with the content! :D
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
*reaches behind shoulder* so, do you want the knife back?
@bitcoinsig5 ай бұрын
Just note that these often don't have offloading/rdma support, so your speed gets throttled by the max ghz speed of a single core. If I were to guess, it's very likely if you had opened the task manager and viewed the cpu utilization, your top speed was a result of a pegged single core somewhere on wither the laptop or the nas. It;s just something to note when adding these types of devices to budget devices, like a raspberry pi, over using a pci card which may have rdma.
@tommybronze34516 ай бұрын
I'm using for last 2 years an USB-C, thunderbolt 3 .... which falls under the usb-c speed requirements to 10GBe. It's great for laptop, but NOT for server ... those are not stable enough. And my one is actually the QNAP and works as a standard usb-c without need for thunderbolt protocol (yes tested it under linux on AMD machine and it purrs like a kitten). So that's not that new thing. Yes it was expensive, but it really helped me achieve a very stable 10gig connection for my laptop.
@StenIsaksson6 ай бұрын
I have an internal TP-Link TX401 10Gbit PCIe card. It has a 4x PCIe connector. I noticed when I connected the card to a 1x slot on the motherboard the bandwidth was limited to about 600 MB/s In that USB version, the M.2 slot might just use one lane.
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Already solved this I think (with another YTer in the pinned comment). SATA M.2...ARRRGGHH
@MrMoonsilver6 ай бұрын
Another advantage is that TB doesn't work on all mainboards. Namely the ones that obviously don't have TB
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
I'm looking forward to seeing how USB4 adoption on NAS systems are going to open the door to way, WAY cheaper and accessible 10GbE and 25GbE...now THAT I am looking forward to. At least 5 high enthusiast/Prosumer desktop profile systems coming at the year from the mainstream NAS brands that have USB4...BOOM!
@vladimir.smirnov6 ай бұрын
What worries me, that PCIe cards based on same Marvell AQC113 chipset have a relatively massive heatsink (and kinda needs one for ~5W power consumption), while this one on one hand looks like they planned chassis to be a part of heatsink, but after disassembly it looks like internal tiny radiator just don't come into contact with it at all and I wonder if that small piece of metal is enough to keep it cool under load?
@NickNickE6 ай бұрын
Is this not the lower power ‘commercial’ version that Is used in the Apple studio / Mac mini with 10gbe upgrade? I assumed Apple had bought up the supply of these, that’s why we’ve waited so long for the version that doesn’t run as hot to be more widely available.
@ShawnKoppenhoefer3 ай бұрын
@@NickNickE Inside SystemSettings>About>Thunderbolt on a laptop M2 Pro,.. this is identified as "Thunderbolt3 LP SSD" which I understand the LP is meant to say "Low Power" device.
@momotoneko6 ай бұрын
I find rj45 10gbe stuff runs h-o-t… (I’ve been recently transitioning to fibre) just wondering if you run a test with some better cooling… dry ice or something… 😅… see if it transfers quicker 😊
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
I'll add it to the to-do list, but that's a tough setup on a budget. Maybe standard ice packs
@espressomatic5 ай бұрын
If you come across a device with SFP+ at a similar price point, please make another video. I have this one on order, but the copper connection means another $30 or so to connect it to my SFP+ switch.
@file1manАй бұрын
@ I'm faily certain 10 gbe has severe heat problems, especially where the wire goes into the switch.2.5 should be best for most people. So what about the heat?
@fanshaw6 ай бұрын
We really should be encouraging PCIE, not USB where performance is important. It encourages oversubscription and people end up wondering why their stuff doesn't work well. Demand more PCIE lanes.
@PatrickDKing6 ай бұрын
Everything 10Gbe needs to come down in price.
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
and maybe it's devices like that that'll kick start it
@sysbofh6 ай бұрын
10Gb fiber too. What they are asking for a lousy single SFP+ network card is insulting... These things should be WAY cheaper by now.
@jaylord556 ай бұрын
was wondering if that works out of the enclosure with the nvme to the 10gig directly in the nvme slot on motherboard
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
almost certaoinyl yes, but checking that next week + other tests (with this device - s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_DBaonNv )
@jaylord556 ай бұрын
@@nascompares cool i know my current nas has 0 pcie lanes left over and still has 1 nvme slot left i could throw one into if it worked
@kpetsas6 ай бұрын
I have the Qnap 10gbe adapter and it works great and stable. But it is very noisy. I look forward to using internal pcie cards to replace that.
@mikegrok6 ай бұрын
IOCrest also has a m.2 10gbe. This may be that adapter combin d with a nvme adapter.
@adriftatlas6 ай бұрын
Interesting to see my Reddit post mentioned at 0:33 on a KZbin video I randomly clicked. 🤣 I tried out Sabrent's TB3 10GbE NIC in July of last year and was not impressed with it's performance. It didn't like dealing with tons of small packets, which limits its general purpose use. You mentioned that the one you bought appears to be an AQC113, so it's at least newer than the previous gen AQC107. How are the thermals on it? Any better than the old ones? I'd love to try one but I don't know if I want to buy something that expensive off AE. It's always a gamble with them and returns are a pain.
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Tbh yours was the best comment I found on it to emulate the point, so kudos for being eloquent and concise (unlike me in like 85% of my vids)
@rustyshackleford72006 ай бұрын
Haha I think the seagulls are part of the channel now
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
I mean..they are. Much like the scar on my elbow is a part of my body....but I bloody wish it wasn't! Just a shame I cannot afford a new studio/limb
@TimHunold6 ай бұрын
Aoostar has a 4 bay 2.5gbe N100 powered system at a very decent price.
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Yep, already headed my way at the end of theonth (I hope), so expect the review
@tonicipriani6 ай бұрын
I wonder if that board is the same as those USB4 to NVMe dongles, just now it includes an M.2 to 10GbE adapter. if it's a B+M Key, maybe try plugging an SSD into that board?
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Almost certainly is. I have the m.2 to 10GbE PCB+cable pack on order, so will do a bunch of mini tests when it arrives (this one s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_DBaonNv )
@tonicipriani6 ай бұрын
@@nascompares Well then you can already jerryrig an 10GbE SFP one, those are already available as M.2 (see Ali item 1005007177318125). Albeit that the SFP card is oversized and won't fit inside the heatsink case.
@TimothyLipinski6 күн бұрын
Great Video ! My new Dell laptop only has USB 3.2 Gen 1 and USB 2.0 and HDMI to watch your video on the BIG Screen ! tjl T. Lipinski
@tttomtxhc5 ай бұрын
I wanna swap out the RJ45 adapter board with an SFP+ adapter 👀
@jeffnew12136 ай бұрын
Interesting device! I currently use four OWC Thunderbolt-to-10G adapters on four mini systems which serve as VMware vSAN nodes, and they have been fine, though they run very, very hot. Unfortunately, prices for most variations of those adapters have gone up over the last couple of years. I always wondered by there were no USB 3.1-to-10G adapters. USB 3.1 is much more common than Thunderbolt. I guess we're still not getting those, but as USB 4 gains in popularity -- something that might take a couple of years until it's actually common on devices -- this new adapter might come in handy. Mention of a 25G version piques my interest as well. Unfortunately, a newly acquired RackStation 2418RP+, which needs both a 25G adapter and SSD caching, and has only a single PCIe slot which can accomodate either, but not both of those, is not a candidate for the 25G adapter, as it has no USB 4 or Thunderbolt ports. I am still stuck with a 25G PCIe card and two SATA SSDs occupying two drive bays. Regards to the seagulls.
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Ok, so, 1) DISREGARDS to the seagulls. But also (I should have mentioned this in the vid) the 25G and even 10G qnap ones are/will be using an ASMedia controller that is remarkably new.
@jeffnew12136 ай бұрын
@@nascompares Whoever releases these, or ASMedia itself, needs not only to provide Windows and Linux drivers, but also an ESXi VIB. These aren't typical consumer devices, these are data center class devices, or should be thought of that way.
@MrAntonow2256 ай бұрын
Could I remove the internal m.2 module and plug it straight into a pc motherboard m.2 socket? If it uses pcie internally is it any different?
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
That's already on my 'to do list' for tests next week, along side testing a few NAS that have USB4. Even then, it will just add a 10GbE to the internal of a NAS..which is already a 'thing' (see here s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_DBaonNv ). I ordered one this morning whilst editing this vid (you can see the email order notification in an early screen grab of this video, which I left in). Should arrive in about 7-10 days. That'll be the next fun little modder vid. The big hurdle is that AQtion driver...the QNAP alternative device runs on an ASmedia chip
@neta5406 ай бұрын
@@nascomparesshucking m2 network adapters sound like a nice thing to look at
@marcogenovesi85706 ай бұрын
it should work, the network chip on the card is pcie
@jaapkamstra93436 ай бұрын
Interesting: it being a m.2 have you tried connecting it directly to a m.2 slot? that would be cool :)
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Next test, I promise!
@clusty1Ай бұрын
Any reason you did not test using something like iperf3 ? Doing a file copy includes a lot of issues, that could not be related to the networking perf.
@korayus6 ай бұрын
Great review as always. I just want to ask if I can use 10gbe m.2 card directly on a computer mother board (gen 3 x4). If it works, than I can upgrade to 10Gbe on pc much cheaper and easily.
@SwissPGO6 ай бұрын
I use the sonet since about 3 years on my mac laptop since I have 10 Gb/s fibre to my home (and office). It's bulky and gets quite hot, but has worked flawlessly. If the electronics is the same, i wonder if the smaller package will dissipate enough heat?
@manc014 ай бұрын
I wish that this (I am sure that it can't) could plug into a network port and then connect to a USB drive to provide SMB shares.
@5urg3x3 ай бұрын
You can find the 10Gb pizza box ones used for cheap. I got mine (OWC branded) for $75. It’s the same as the Sonnet, S chip with secure firmware (preferred if using a mac). What USB4 chip is this IOCrest actually using? I’m guessing ASmedia?
@robertlee63386 ай бұрын
What confusion do you have about the two 10gbe TB devices? 2 minute search would have told you that QNAP and Sonnet 10gbe TB adapters use last generation Marvell/Aquantia AQC107 and IOCREST use latest generation Marvell/Aquantia AQC113
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
The confusion is about the presentation of the product. It is being marketed on numerous stores as a USB4 adapter (with TB3/4 support) but lots of the marketing materials online, as well as the packaging of the product just state 'Thunderbolt' or Thunderbolt 3'
@robertlee63386 ай бұрын
@@nascompares The older product came out before USB4 was common or released. Do you expect all the USB3 product makers to redo their websites and printed material to state backward compatible with USB4?
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Yes, I do. If you want to market a product in 2024 and you have stock to shift, it's really easy to add 'USB4' to your website
@robertyboberty6 ай бұрын
Got one of these it's doing an admirable job. Was dirt cheap on Ali Express. It likes ventilation so plan for that
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Nice. Cheers for sharing
@PremiumProductionsUK3 ай бұрын
What's the benefit of this system over a 5Gbps adaptor, given that, 5Gbps is 640MBps and you maxes out under this with the 10Gbps? It would have been good to see you do the same transfers with the 10Gbps Thunderbolt adaptor you have.
@carlgustav71966 ай бұрын
Hi there and thanks for Your video. I was lucky to get a OWV TB3 10G Adapter back in 2022 for „only“ 189 EUR (I think it was an „open box“ device). Fortunately, I could not see a significant bottleneck so far ( File transfers are just a little shy under 1200 MegaByte / s). I understand Your review in this was, that the device tested ist a USB4 to M.2 Adapter wirth an M.2 Network adapter. It would be interesting, if there is still a bottleneck, if You put the 10G network card directly into a regular M.2 slot on a mainboard.
@interfacetc026 ай бұрын
I have bought this one, it is amazing 10GbE Adapter. The price has increased a little bit, but still is reasonable. I think a lot of similar solution is coming, the price will be drop more~
@ne0dam6 ай бұрын
I'm quite curious of the behaviour of the tiny little network card inside the case if it is directly plugged'in a M.2 sata port of a motherboard.
@samgao11 күн бұрын
it's annoying how there are no ITX motherboards with 10Gbe to assist in video production off a NAS.
@TomRobakCom3 ай бұрын
I'm using qnap 10gbe usb card... can you write few words about heat and noise of IOCREST (qnap is hot and loud - very annoying)
@WonderSausage6 ай бұрын
This is not a USB adapter. USB4 requires Thunderbolt 3 as a sub-feature, and this is using TB3. This is Iocrest's long-standing M.2 10GbE adapter on top of a Thunderbolt 3 bridge board in an external enclosure. I imagine they are calling it "USB4" because that sounds trendy, but it's just a Thunderbolt 3 adapter. The only thing notable about it is that it's available a bit cheaper than other TB3 10GbE adapters on the market (e.g. $100 vs. $123). The bridge board literally has an Intel Thunderbolt logo on it, which should have been a clue. Look at your own photo. If you rotate the photo 180 degrees and zoom in on the BGA chip, you can tell it's an Intel JHL6240 Thunderbolt 3 controller from 2019. You could have googled this in seconds. In short, this is just another AQC113 over TB3, nothing to see here, move along. This device is not using a SATA bridge, there is no such thing as a PCIe device behind a SATA bridge. The only thing you can connect to SATA, is a SATA device (obviously). If this adapter performs at less than 10GbE wire speed that's because of the Thunderbolt encapsulation overhead, which shouldn't be high enough to bring it down to 6Gbps. You're probably using a SATA SSD on one end or the other.
@PierreVilleneuve884 ай бұрын
I am still waiting for a m-ITX motherboard with 10Gbe built-in. I don't want 4 slow ports. And unfortunately, CWWK doenst have a board with USB4 even if they are using gen 14th Intel CPU.
@Raintiger885 ай бұрын
I've been looking at M.2 PCIe 10gbe adapters for months. No idea why they are so expensive and while I'd love to buy a few for machines I have where I can't use a card, the pricing is ridiculous.
@johnfritz11646 ай бұрын
Can you try iperf3 between the laptop and the NAS? I would like to see the network numbers that way.
@droneforfun53845 ай бұрын
How can the 10g nics be sovexpensive? Hardware seems like 5usd max
@RRMIAMI3 ай бұрын
Compatible with thunderbolt 4 dock stations?
@TimoGoetz5 ай бұрын
I have a question: I have the new 8 bay Das from Ugreen. I trying since days to connect my MacBook to the Gas via Ethernet wire directly, but it didn't work. I activate already the SMB in the Green Nas. But the Problem is, that via Lan cable I am unable to connect. But with wifi ( when the Nas is connected to the router ) the SMB is working and I can find the gas in the Finder in Macbook and can access the files. Only by Lan it's not working. Do you know why it's like this? Do I need a 10Gbit to usb c / thunderbolt adapter ? Because I am using right now a 1 Gbit adapter to usb c. greetings
@BaronCAD6 ай бұрын
I'm still just waiting for pcie gen4/5 x1 slot 10gbe nics. Smaller form-factor motherboards (ITX or mATX) are increasingly dropping the second x16 slot, and only leaving one or two x1 slots beyond the single x16 slot for the GPU. All the 10gbe cards I've seen for like 4 years now are stuck at gen3, which needs more than 1 pcie lane to handle bi-directional 10gbe.
@hiddenhen5 ай бұрын
so what's the verdict... is there a bottleneck because there's a m.2 adapter in the "flow"? is there a way to test if that m.2 port is NVME or SATA?
@TheFishTankChannel6 ай бұрын
on those external TB to XGB, isn't there an additional CPU overhead hit for using it in TB vs PCIe integrated XGB
@mrronenzaАй бұрын
Is it compatible to new iMac M4 ?
@KaceyGreen6 ай бұрын
that looks like a quarter the size of my TB3 UBS 10GBE adapter... yes the same one you just dangled there
@KaceyGreen6 ай бұрын
Eat a calculator :D
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
It was that, or go F a microwave...and I perhaps felt that I was crossing an line there....
@KaceyGreen6 ай бұрын
@@nascompares LOL, yeah don't need the AI suppressing the video
@MrSunDevil236 ай бұрын
I paused to read the bus test-hahahaha!! We will likely never meet but I am raising a beer to you mate!!
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Cheers mate! (Both definitions)
@Vara91391Ай бұрын
Does this work for PC windows 11, or is this yet another Apple only thing ?
@yesmanhk5 ай бұрын
seems my DS920+ with Intel Celeron J4125 4-core 2.0 GHz not going to support this
@DominikSchmid6 ай бұрын
Could you try this adapter with the Ugreen DXP 480T Plus as Ugreen mentioned that their Thunderbolt 4 connections would only be purposed for additional storage.
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
1000%! The mini flash one will be the first thing I test, also an aoostar with TN, plus the minisforum MS-01 with UnRAID. Unsure if UGOS will allow the AQC driver installation, but never say never
@FinalGrade6 ай бұрын
They said they are planning on getting IP over thunderbolt functionality. I emailed support about it. Also if you use proxmox or truenas on it instead apparently you can just use the thunderbolt over ip with no adapter necessary.
@cassielmeng7805 ай бұрын
love your video!!
@FinalGrade6 ай бұрын
What are your thoughts on IP over thunderbolt? I was thinking of doing this to completely avoid having to buy an adapter all together with the new UGREEN NAS.
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
It's good, but also it has a big overhead and most thunderbolt over IP NAS devices struggle to get above 1200...1500MB on the best day! That said, now SMB Multichannel is entering supported territory with IP over TB, that WILL make this a game changer
@PizzlesTechTime6 ай бұрын
I just bought a PCIe to 10 gig adapter and also a thunderbolt 3 10 gig adapter
@GeekTechTeam6 ай бұрын
Me too. And a Unifi aggregation switch.
@PizzlesTechTime6 ай бұрын
@@GeekTechTeam I logged into my managed switch but now that I rebooted my router it is not allowing me access. Not sure what I have to change on FiOS
@bewa_6 ай бұрын
All those existing 10 GbE Adapters you just showed in the video (sonnet, qnap, sabrent, etc.) are suffering from heat problems, thermal throttling and death from overheating. Even actively cooled devices like the qnap running hot after some hours and is very noisy with the active fan. I really don't see that this smaller device with even less heat sinks or active cooling will do the job without overheating? Did you "stress test" it with a longer session but the short speed tests? Ordering it from aliexpress or other Chinese warehouses is just painful when you need to send it back or have warranty claims. So even when it is much cheaper, when you can't claim your warranty for a product that tends to overheat, I see it as really problematic.
@JonathanSwiftUK6 ай бұрын
What! A USB to 10Gb that isn't using the Realtek chips. Um, interesting. It makes a very big difference since I'd want to use it with Windows server, so getting a working, up-to-date driver is difficult with those Realtek-based adapters, for 2.5Gb to 10Gb.
@_PITBOY6 ай бұрын
If we gave you a red button on your desk there ... and what it did was quietly electrocute and dematerialize any seagull that is in physical contact with the building there ... would you push it?
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
I'd hammer the button till it was dust
@EViL36666 ай бұрын
Is this really USB? Or a re-badged TB3/4?
@mauricechong8096 ай бұрын
What happens if you use this usb4 adapter on a usb 3 (type c) port? I would be interested to see how it go and how fast it can work, if at all?
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Unfortunately, tried it, and nothing. Not even 1/2.5/5G. But testing on more devices next week
@sl1ckk1ll3r6 ай бұрын
Sorry Rob but you missed a big problem here and I’m seeing the biggest bottleneck straight off the bat on the teardown @ 5:54 I can clearly see the M.2 connector is a SATA spec M.2 (See the 2 notches which are M and B keyed) meaning the max speed of the bus is 600MB/s as the max bandwidth is 6GB/s Also before anyone say it - 🤓💀
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Ahhhhhhh! Very well spotted. Will amend the review accordingly and address this in vid two. That's what I get for filming all the tests THEN asking someone else to do the filming of the strip down after-the-fact (to get this published today). Not a good enough excuse though. Nevertheless, I'm still going to investigate the hell of out of how AJA, ATTO (and several other block tests) hit full 1GB saturation during testing. Couldn't have been caching, as it's a clean test externally. Thanks for the comment man, genuinely appreciate it and happy to put my hands up when I F up!
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Update, pinned comment added + card in the vid. Cheers again man
@sl1ckk1ll3r6 ай бұрын
@@nascompares honestly you're a top man and a bloke I've respected for many years (favourite NAS QNAP 1677X) so I wouldn't be living up to my role as a Storage Architect and Infrastructure specialist if I didn't say something, gotta look out for you. Tbh there are a few reasons you might've had 1GB reads but I'm sure you'll come to a consensus, if you need any details lmk
@marcogenovesi85706 ай бұрын
both B+M and M key slots are supposed to support PCIe or Sata connection so calling this a "SATA spec M.2" makes no sense. Sata is a storage device interface and is not used here. The AQC113 network chip in this board is using PCIe lanes like any other network chipset. B+M key connector supports 2 lanes of PCIe, and that gives it at the very least 0.5GB/s of bandwith (with pcie 1.0) up to 4GB/s (with pcie 4.0). GB = GigaByte We don't know what pcie version is used in the M.2 to USB-C adapter but 10 Gbit/s is 1.25GB/s. As long as it's using PCIe 3.0 or higher this device is not bottlenecked by the B+M M.2 interface
@WonderSausage6 ай бұрын
@@marcogenovesi8570 This is correct. There is no such thing as a PCIe device behind a SATA bridge.
@kazumakazuma58146 ай бұрын
This adapter doesn't work with unraid.
@chrispeden9796 ай бұрын
I’m confused, my OWC is bus powered as well. So I don’t understand you said this is uniquely bus powered.
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Mainly because ALOT of users from a few years ago either had to rely on docking stations to convert TB to Ethernet, or because the first wave of these kind of adapters came from the likes of ATTO...and they were MASSIVE, cost about 500-1000, and needed mains power. I just highlighted the bus power here to catch some users up.
@InspectorGadget20146 ай бұрын
I do like the pun's and your humor, and yes, I paused the video, likewise Robert A.! I do not eat calculators but I do eat chips! (joke!) But back to seriousness; If you have a spare, unused USB4 (or TB3/4) port available, it would be a great solution without losing a (more sparse) PCI-slot for a network-adapter. And is way more cost-effective utilising the TB3/4 port(s) beyond 2 meters via e.g. an optical cable (yes, these also exist but are ridiculous expensive). As USB4 is not that common-place on (pre-build) NAS machines as far as I'm aware, but plenty with TB3 and/or TB4 ports. Could be a win-win in such situations.
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
I KNEW you would read it..and you counter-punned. Respect. That aside, USB4 on Prosumer and enthusiast NAS is looking v common in the next generation. Adapters like this one, and the ASmedia based ones with 2x10G and 25GbE, for compact NAS, are going to be a bloody godsend. Especially with everyone and his dad, rolling out NVMe NAS systems, even at X1 speeds
@InspectorGadget20146 ай бұрын
@@nascompares I really appreciate your efforts, your humor is epic, really is! I'm also thinking about SMB multi-channel as USB4 is indeed becoming more common-place as you said, it could be beneficial for those Prosumers possibly in that arena too. Indeed a bloody godsend. Thanks for spotting & elaborating on this!
@christianponopp87566 ай бұрын
Can you put the 10Gbe Card directly in a M.2 on a motherboard and it Runs?
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Testing first thing next week!
@christianponopp87566 ай бұрын
@@nascompares If you let us know that would be great it would be a cheap upgrade for my itx server which already has a 3050 as transcoding card inside.
@SpoonHurler6 ай бұрын
3:54 Dual 10gbe, I'm listening 😅
@junior-OG6 ай бұрын
😍
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Hold fire on that! It's using an ASMedia chip and still a wee way from release
@Nextrix6 ай бұрын
At this point you need to start selling "I hate seagulls" shirts with NASCompares branding on them.
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Seriously though, who the hell would buy that???? Out of context, it would look suuuuuuuper aggressively anti avian. I need to be clear. Pigeon, fine. Crows, kinda cool. Blue tit, solid 10/10 name. But seagulls, horrendous POS
@ParadiseofDarkness23 күн бұрын
Should i be worried that's takes me to a Chinese website that's not safe my computer say. I got the small one you are holding...
@TransformXRED6 ай бұрын
Need DaVinci Resolve Studio.... Voice isolation = no more annoying birds
@TheCynysterMind6 ай бұрын
Trouble for PC users is that USB-C peaks at ~ 330Mbps (Using BlackMagicDesign speed test) My test just moments ago on a NvMe 1TB drive in a USB-c Enclosure give a Max speed 37.0MB/s Read and 41.6MB/s Write My Test on 10GB Network to my Synology (TP-link NIC and Synology 10G addin card) 733.9MB/s write and 1078 MB/s Read For windows users a 10Gig usb adapter would be a waste of money as you would never realize 10G speeds with it.
@tombouie6 ай бұрын
Thks buts where's Eddie; Mr Sea-Gull appears on the show more than Eddie now-a-days.
@christianponopp87566 ай бұрын
A 5Gbit on USB 3.2 would be great.
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
That exists. QNAP have one
@TheFishTankChannel6 ай бұрын
@NASCompares @2:54 thank you for the joke.
@gumshoe-tech6 ай бұрын
Too Much Coffee? or not enough Coffee!
@grisha06 ай бұрын
yes... paused... yes read the description... the picture is of Polish Bus nickname "cucumber" - Ogorek :)
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
I mean, fairplay man...you NAILED IT! Also, as if me being hot about data storage doesn't make me the coolest dude in town, I also love learning about public transport...thanks! Genuinely!
@wooden21875 ай бұрын
If you want me to eat a calculator you’ll have to pay additional fees. 😂
@CptBlackEye6 ай бұрын
I paused the video to read the bus meme and laughed my azz off... LMAO
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
*sarcastic bus judges you*
@PieVsCake6 ай бұрын
So ya... now we just need a synology NAS that has USB4 ports...
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Roll on 2030 baby!
@shanent57936 ай бұрын
A proper breakfast, 6-8 fried eggs, should take care of those shakes
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Yes, but then the rest of the video would be me breathing real heavy and glistening in the studio lights like a big ham!
@SOU69006 ай бұрын
Guess I'm the one person to pause the video😂
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Nooooooo. Don't be that guy.
@SOU69006 ай бұрын
@nascompares 🤣 In all honesty, I didn't really know about the joke to start with. I just paused the video to read what it said, and that's it.
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
That......is the right answer. Thank you
@SOU69006 ай бұрын
@@nascompares 😆
@KaceyGreen6 ай бұрын
@@SOU6900 Same, but I got the joke upon seeing the old Bus though
@keithwolf63626 ай бұрын
lol yes i paused to read your bus text😁
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
I respect that.
@nick93236 ай бұрын
I choose m.2 to pcie and tb to pcie for mini pcs. This way I have old cheap and everwhere supported pcie cards, instead of this
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
What if your system lacks a PCIe slot? Are you saying would prefer a ePCIe case instead?
@nick93236 ай бұрын
NUCs come with tb port for like ~10 years and also have m.2. So I use egpu thunderbolt and K43SG from aliexpress and one PSU with splitter cable for both. This way I can use pcie SAS controller and 10G NIC with common NUC's. For drives I got emc ktn-stl3 for 120 usd.
@JeremyMcMahan6 ай бұрын
Paused, laughed. (heads to eat calculator.)
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
..it's for the best *nibbles abacus starter*
@file1manАй бұрын
I'm not very up to date, knowledge wise, but I suspect this unit has about a .582 gps and you badly are misleading people, didnt look closely at your review unit, and probably should take this well meaning but very weak, misleading video down.
@kwinzman6 ай бұрын
This was soooo frustrating to watch, because in the whole 12 minute video you are never answered the most important question. The main question about this USB4 to 10GBE NIC is if it requires tunneled PCI Express from the host or not. PCIe tunneling support is optional in USB4! If it does require PCIe tunneling, then where is the innovation vs the Thunderbolt 3 NICs that have been on the market for years? Most USB4 hosts with PCIe tunneling are backwards compatible with Thunderbolt 3 peripherals and happily take TB3 NICs. If it does not require PCIe tunneling support from the host, then this device would be something to get excited about. Otherwise I am afraid this is just a TB3 device like the ones that have existed for years that somebody slapped a USB4 sticker on. Secondly, and not quite as grating: I believe you only tested with 9k jumbo frames and never 1.5k frames? That's a bit of an odd choice. Honestly this video left me with more questions than answers. Hope this feedback, despite being harsh, is helpful to you!
@gibsonblogger6 ай бұрын
This is a Thunderbolt 3 device so USB4's Thunderbolt 3 compatibility option is required.
@waynetaylor27846 ай бұрын
10gbe usb NO THANKS, yeah 20 bux for a pci card 10gbe nic card.. way better deal.. x540 t2 with fan
@KaceyGreen6 ай бұрын
Yeah that's what I put in my NASs but I can't put it in my laptop, and my PC is full
@nascompares6 ай бұрын
Where the hell is this $20 10G nic...and if it ain't 2nd hand, how the hell does it not explode! Cheapest 1G reliable NICs I've found are like £40.
@waynetaylor27846 ай бұрын
@@nascompares just make sure you buy with heatsink and fan installed , Aliexpress
@waynetaylor27846 ай бұрын
Keep deleting my answers@@nascompares
@BoraHorzaGobuchul6 ай бұрын
@@nascompares of course he's speaking of second hand ones