A220-100 vs Embraer E195-E2: Which is the better SMALL Jet?

[@oneskyflyer]

Hey there! For MORE Great Plane Spotting photos, be sure to HEAD OVER to official IG here -> instagram.com/oneskyflyer/ and FOLLOW ONESkyFlyer there for more great Plane Spotting photos!

[@sebastianfloyd372]

I’ve got a request for you. Can you do a video of Airbus should make A321XERs

[@johndiax7943]

i prefer the E195-E2

[@naubermiranda1025]

Depends on the carrier's strategy. No one is going to pay 27 million dollars more for the A220 if they need a regional jet only. No one is going to buy E195 E2 if they need transatlantic range capability.

[@sergiolaurencio7534]

That true. But If E build a more biger jet, I would buy it

[@sergiolaurencio7534]

Also any of them are immune the the covid impact

[@user-daddyuwu]

You've got a good point there. I wouldn't pay 27 million dollars for an aircraft with less seating but only more range.

[@thomaszachariadis634]

Good regional planes both E2 175 & 195 get my vote

[@interstellaraviator6437]

Why not 190? Are you a racist to 190!?

[@claudiomanoeldasilvatucund6567]

@@interstellaraviator6437 190 Is A Good Choice Too...

[@praneetsharma339]

prefer to E195-E2 .. it's best to buy because low maintenance & service charge and cheapest price for airlines company

[@JohnAnderson-sq8lt]

The maintenance is high, thats why Air Canada sold their aircrft off, they were only 10 years old and also burned too much fuel

[@ph4nt0m22]

@@JohnAnderson-sq8lt dude those were not E2's. WTF are you even on about. This has nothing to do with the video or the planes we are discussing.

[@rdymond04]

The A220 is better

[@carlosaugustoerthal8098]

Longer maintenance intervals, no middle seats, less noise inside and outside, larger pilot pool, lower trip costs. E2 made by proud and independent Embraer.

[@sergiolaurencio7534]

@@JohnAnderson-sq8lt Those have to be 737 or other. Not E

[@lonleysailor]

I believe the E195-E2 has the customer comfort advantage for domestic routes with 2-2 seating, NOBODY wants the center seat of 3-2 seating. The E195-E2 is a nice add for smaller carrier due to 90% commonality between all E series aircraft. My vote is Embraer for smaller carrier, the A220/CS100 fits current fleets of most larger carriers.

[@sergiolaurencio7534]

basically is DC-9 just more modern, but that all. The E95 is better for me.

[@andrewpettola6097]

Both are excellent aircraft. It really comes down to the need of the airline.

[@oneskyflyer]

Andrew Pettola Thanks for your comment. Well yes for short routes only the cheaper E195 is the better option, though the A220-100 is more versatile with its Long range opening up new Long thin routes. Thanks for watching and if you have not done so do consider subscribing and stay tuned for more great videos!

[@olcayozturk1124]

E2 Best jet

[@franciscogomes4416]

For regional flights Embraer been 20 millions cheaper, carring more passengers its a no brainer. E95 is the best

[@ronisaripaulus5112]

the E195 E2

[@betoquelhas]

Embraer E2. Suas asas são uma obra de arte, é silencioso. Belo avião!

[@kamaruddin9172]

Not everybody want to cross the atlantic ocean, the majority just want to visit their love one.

[@lizaelliott6862]

E2 takes my heart! Embraer really gets the windows right. The square shape makes them wider than usual oblong windows and is just perfect for gazing. Even better than 787 windows in my opinion.

[@PAPIREY7]

Both are great but embraer is my favorite ☺️

[@Blackblueassault]

E2 from Brazil baby !!!! The best jet !!! 💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷

[@machzero1457]

É isso aí 🇧🇷

[@amonmorais9517]

Embraer fits into the market...The bestttttttt...

[@katisuhara]

For me the E2 serves one market and the A220 another market and there is not the best one, but the one that will suit each specific route for each airline, to obtain better competitiveness and profit. Passengers may have a preference for one or the other, but in general they will fly both, what will differentiate is the ticket price and the availability of flights.

[@devon896]

A220, the range is too much, but is actually very good so it can fly transatlantic. E195 the range is too short, but its just right for regional flights but it can't do transatlantic. A bit of a mixed message. The A220 is basically a A318 designed by Bombardier with better fuel efficiency. The E2 is designed with regional flying in mind, it's not designed for transatlantic. In my opinion they are two completely different aircraft serving two different markets. The E2 is a upgrade of the original and popular E-jet The A220 is a mix, combining the benefits of regional aircraft with the range and flexibility of the A320/737 family, effectively creating a new market.

[@sergiosouza1425]

What do the airlines preffer? To buy(or to lease) "3" A220 ( 243 mi ) or "4" E195 E2 (240 mi ) ?

[@gabrielrenanamantedeaviao.750]

Que for mais barato e acessível

[@rob_olmstead]

@Honest Person I wonder why some airlines prefer the E2, the a220-300 is better in most (if not all) performance standards.

[@angelotig]

Both the A220 and the E195 are remarkable Jets.

[@sydnick6696]

Angelo t - Air Canada bought EmB 5 and 195 instead of MD-95 because they were cheap. . Big mistake ! First of all; they spent millions trying to get the jungle jets through the Canadian winters. They could not use the 175 over the mountains because of since engine performance, etc. They were terrible airplanes. Currently, they are disposing of the 190s and replacing them with A220. in short; the EmB was NOT a good aircraft. As an aside; it was Air Canada's last minute decision to buy cheap instead of quality that put the final nail in the MD-95 program. and perhaps changed the eventual course of history, as Boeing took over MD, but promoted their own dysfunctional 737 MIN, which was an eventual disaster. The MD-95/717 was a superior aircraft.

[@pw3093]

@@sydnick6696 Dispatch at Air Canada call them the Embraer "180's" because of how often they break down and have to turn around. Don't expect major Airline players to continue to buy Embraer products.

[@naubermiranda1025]

I wonder how is it possible a bad plane that cost 50-100 million dollars sell + 1600 units, leading for 2 decades its category worldwide. Probably voodoo or macumba, haha

[@sergiolaurencio7534]

Both aircraft. Are good. But for me, the 737 was the first to find the lost treasure of the " Small Jets". Don't matter the nightmares is suffering now. It would wake UP!

[@sergiolaurencio7534]

I am so sad about her

[@claudiomanoeldasilvatucund6567]

I love to fly on the Embraer 175, 190, and 195 ... It feels comfortable and safe, now with the arrival of the Embraer 195 E2 my flights will be on airlines equipped with the Embraer195 E2 of course ...

[@yano9669]

Thx for this video. I’ve been searching the internet for a comparison of these 2 aircrafts and I finally got it

[@oneskyflyer]

DaBossestDude Thanks for your comment. Yeah I could not find any such comparisons as the small jets often get overlooked thus I decided to compare the two largest small regional jets! Stay tuned for yet another interesting small jet video coming next week! Thanks for watching and if you have not don so do consider subscribing and stay tuned for next weeks small jet video!

[@ronisaripaulus5112]

I would chose the e195

[@paulhuizenga3220]

Having flown in both in first class, the E2 175 & 195 are far better than the A220. Economy, they are very similar. The key is how each positions it's seats in the FC cabin. The A220 is a 2 and 2 standard configuration with very limited space between the seats. And the tray table is not friendly to any one of size. The E2 is a 1 and 2 and can stagger seats for additional separation of FC passengers.

[@interstellaraviator6437]

A220 is a good modern aircraft which will have modern potential in the future, while E2 is piece of art and good example what can you really do with modern technologies and older aircraft. It is not just about putting new engines and small aerodynamic and software rework (A320neo and B737MAX) but the haul new wing, slightly exchanged stabilizer and addition of composits.

[@isaacweddle1501]

1:00 "it was targeted at bombardier's best selling e195" 🤣

[@williamhuang8309]

I think he/she meant Embraier

[@thecaynuck4694]

It's like saying Boeing A380 lmao

[@robertofernandes4375]

Just a little hiccup there....

[@rotekarte8]

I think the argument of these aircrafts being used in transatlantic operations is too much forcing.

[@effeo9962]

And why would that be? There are destinations in the middle of the Atlantic that make sense for an A220: Iceland or the Azores, for example.

[@rotekarte8]

Effe O I don’t think so. For a regular operation the A320neo family it would be mora appropriate. For an Leisure Airline, maybe it would work.

[@robertofernandes4375]

Both planes are wonderful machines. I think that Bombardier was aiming to hit Boeing, Airbus and Embraer all at the same time with one single shot.... and they actually succeeded, up to a point. They hurt those three companies, but having said that, the market post pandemic, will be highly favourable to both Airbus and especially to Embraer. The 195 E2 is extremely quiet, has a very attractive sales price, lower maintenance cost and technologically speaking, it is as advanced, if not more, than the Airbus counterpart and there is one other very important aspect which is the after sales service provided by Embraer, which is unparalleled in the industry. So, it will be very interesting to see how they are going to deal with the increasing competition from Russia and China. To my mind, the future looks bright for Embraer, especially now that it is free from the disastrous deal with Boeing. Good luck to both aircraft, they are fantastic.

[@marcosdanyamada4680]

E195-E2!!

[@jimmygee3219]

You seem to write all these videos from the view points of defending the Airbus products against their competitors rather than an actually objective comparison

[@amonmorais9517]

He's always defending airbus, hahahaha

[@jojorox7493]

When you order Airbus aircraft in bulk they give the airline a nice discount so don't go by list price. Embraer has already discounted the E-Jet as much as they can.

[@taketheleft5738]

Do u think Airbus is capable to achieve 20,25... millions discount to compete with Embraer 60 millions price list? I don't think so!

[@Kanseal]

@@taketheleft5738 yes they can..... they didn’t pay for the development of the airplain... bombardier did. Think so😌

[@taketheleft5738]

@@Kanseal who knows?

[@Drendle87]

Good comparison. However some Airlines are now looking to smaller Jets with longer range to use on long distance routes that have lower demand. I think the range of the A-220 is a reflection of that. The flexibility to have a narrow body jet that can serve both short and long routes.

[@oneskyflyer]

Major Garlic Williams Thanks for your support! Yep the A220 will open up many new markets for airlines just like the fuel efficient 787 did when it was introduced, only it will allow even more city pairs thanks to its low capacity making it easy to fill. The A220 is the best aircraft in its class. Thanks for watching and do consider subscribing if you have not done so and of course, stay tuned for more great weekly videos!

[@joaquimaragao1324]

For longer routes , there are different narrow bodies. 737 and 320 have been serving these, and smaller routes, also. I think, Airbus aquisition of Bombardier aimed at preempt the market that this manufacturer wanted to explore.

[@marcosmalinvernipagliosa9861]

The E195 definitely has a nicer interior, much more silente. I got impressive, it's 20% more silente and less poluente too. State of the art airplane.

[@sergiolaurencio7534]

also is not 2-3 comfiguration

[@eliosgreek8028]

After grounding by Swiss airline having some trouble in P&W 1500 G series turbofan engines ,i would like to go with Embraer E series Jet( old series , cause E2 has same 1100G series engine). Embraer E 195 is 30 million $ cheaper than A220-100. Huge savings. Future of aviation industry would be of short / medium haul flights,so transatlantic capabilities is not a prime factor.

[@oneskyflyer]

elios greek Thanks for your comment. Yep Swiss has taken extreme action and grounded their fleet of A220s. Other airlines like Air Baltic are also inspecting their A220 engines. The E-jet series has been proven and is one of the most reliable small aircraft out there with similar levels of efficiency and the right capability for short haul flights within the US. Thanks for watching stay tuned for more great videos!

[@mariamartins367]

Official listing prices mean nothing, absolutely nothing.

[@ERAviation-sq7ud]

If only you knew how bad the original 190'/195s CF34-10E engines are. Apparently a 737-8 has the same fuel burn as an original 190 while carrying twice the load!

[@ricardomochikawa62]

Depends on the strategy, but I honestly believe that the business case is favorable to Embraer E2, mainly considering regional routes.

[@htsaul1569]

I disagree that the A220 cabin is better than E2 for one reason. Look at the seats 4:05, the configuration in E2 is 2x2 in the other hand A220 has a 3x2 configuration. The A220 just isn't symmetrical plus seating with another 2 person by your side is much more worse than just one person. What do you think?Do you prefer +0,5 inch on the seat or seating with just 1 person by your side rather than two?

[@ERAviation-sq7ud]

Hey easy solution, select a seat on the "2" side and then you don't have to complain. Sure no one likes a middle seat and if you really cared you'd pay for seat selection to avoid one anyway and choose between your preference of aisle vs window.

[@Iamfreeforever7]

Nice video, A220 all the way. All airlines that placed A220 orders declared and started new routes, flexibility that is offered by A220 is the winning factor. The only thing I like about embraer is 2 by 2 seating configuration.

[@oneskyflyer]

AHMAD HAMADE Thanks for your comment. Yep the A220 is one of the best small aircrafts ever! However, there is a middle seat, even if that seat is wider than E Jet. Thanks for watching and if you have not done so do consider subscribing and stay tuned for more great weekly videos!

[@karlossargeant3872]

@@oneskyflyer #A220TOTHEWORLD

[@carloswasco2340]

Meu voto lógico, EMBRAER 195 E2, bem mais confortável do que o concorrente.

[@jonasfernandes7854]

Bem imparcial.

[@rdymond04]

The A220 has wider seats than the Embraer E2

[@carloswasco2340]

@@rdymond04 sim contudo isso, e uma questão de preferência, EMBRAER e Claro 😀👍

[@rdymond04]

@@carloswasco2340 I only speak english, so I have no idea what you are saying

[@fraserhenderson7839]

The A220 has a Trifecta of glowing approval from pilots, ground crew and passengers, rare in any aircraft.

[@oneskyflyer]

Fraser Henderson Thanks for your comment. Yep passengers, airlines all love the aircraft as it provides high levels of comfort for a small jet with excellent operating economics and great reliability. Thanks for watching and if you like this video and have not done so do consider subscribing and stay tuned for more great videos!

[@sydnick6696]

A220 is probably the most technically advanced aircraft flying today.

[@yegfreethinker]

The A220 fills me with so much pride as a Canadian. I hope despite Bombardier's past troubles Airbus sees what our Aviation Engineers to give the world. Our people here in this country designed this beautiful, elegant, modern plane that can help the reduce our carbon. I think this aircraft has a potential to change point-to-point travel. I think it's a change that is for the better and hopefully Airbus will invest in Canadian Aviation. I promise you Airbus you won't regret it. 😃

[@paulofps10]

E2

[@Kanseal]

Hands down A220. Due to its longer range especially for the transatlantic It’s going to be a good transition plane during this pandemic 🙏🏻

[@JichealMackson1]

There is the e190-e2 with longer range

[@Kanseal]

@@JichealMackson1 logically the A220 is a better plane and it’s now with airbus Embraer is losing a lot without being with boeing😅 i would touch a embraer plane with a 20 feet pole dude Plus what they did to bombardier in 2016, they can go to he**

[@doabarrellroll69]

@@Kanseal the Boeing-Embraer deal fell through last year

[@ph4nt0m22]

@@Kanseal Dream on. Bombardier basically headed to bankruptcy and had to sell the 220 to Airbus, on the other hand, Embraer keeps manufacturing its own planes + the largest military aircraft from Latam. Well, I wouldnt touch the planes from a failed company such as Bombardier with a 2000 feet pole. Have a nice dream.

[@myyoshistory]

@@ph4nt0m22 do a little more research before making false claims

[@fahmialeeisamanodi380]

Both of them are nice 😊

[@22ndCenturyBasterd]

E2 for the win - Much cheaper for airlines - Great track record - Transport more people - The range is enough tbh. You could fly Munich to Dubai on the E2. - 25% more fuel efficient than the E1.

[@onlineo2263]

Have you seen those tiny windows? No thank you. Not for more than 1 hour in the air. Definitely not for 5 hour flights. Both are basically as fuel efficient as each other. Airbus offer the a220 300 if you need more passengers. I expect them to offer much longer versions in the future, including a 500,700, 900 and possibly eventually a 1000 model. Also list price of an airbus is not what you pay. So if you look at actual selling price I imagine they are very similar. In fact the a220 may currently be cheaper... But I expect this to change in the future.

[@22ndCenturyBasterd]

@@onlineo2263 they're standard windows. What's wrong with them? The A220 cannot get bigger because it will clash with the capacity of the A320. Yes I know airlines don't pay the list price for Airbus planes... Same for Embraer. So in the end the Embraer deserves its title of the Profit Hunter.

[@sergiolaurencio7534]

also 2-2 comfiguration

[@andyvu4577]

For 140-150seats segment, e2 195 and A220 family are the best option for regional and short haul. However, airlines still have a319neo to consider.

[@jr.robertoguedes4047]

👏👏👏AIRBUSS é maior que a EMBRAER 🇧🇷🇧🇷 ...but...O E2 é a melhor

[@carloswasco2340]

Maior em comprimento e o E2, o concorrente e mais curto e mais largo, cabendo mais passageiro, mas o EMBRAER 195 E2 e o mais confortável

[@PsychoXXI]

@@kirkykyle2144 Não tem como um avião desses ser ruim, 1mbecil.

[@PsychoXXI]

@@kirkykyle2144 Pesquisar em revistas pagas pelo concorrente?

[@PsychoXXI]

@@kirkykyle2144 O YT diz o contrário, todos que vi falam bem.

[@PsychoXXI]

@@kirkykyle2144 É óbvio que não são todos da mesma forma que não são todos que falam bem do A220.

[@osetra9568]

If Boeing had just updated their 737 like the E2, new landing gear, there wouldnt be a problem anymore

[@effeo9962]

Not everyone trusts Boeing, though.

[@zabaleta66]

Boeing would take shortcuts somewhere.

[@windanthonystream]

Exactly... If they would have put a little more money in development of the 737 then they wouldn’t be in the predicament that they are in now. When Boeing updated the Classic 737 to the Next Generation it got a new wing and lightly taller landing gear. They should have done the same with the Max. They should have updated the wing and taller landing gear. But they was trying to save pennies and now they are paying for it.

[@edmanuelrodriguez8326]

false

[@edmanuelrodriguez8326]

@@effeo9962 false

[@eastmarvista3267]

Which aircraft offers the best customer experience?

[@leonardonascimentomendonca543]

Embraer maginific

[@litosertanejo8556]

Embraer is better and more comfortable

[@thecaynuck4694]

Lol, not at all. Embraer is screwed after their tenure with Boeing and the A220 has been rated as more comfortable. Bombardier and Airbus won over Embraer and Boeing.

[@litosertanejo8556]

@@thecaynuck4694 the Embraer is cheaper than a220 and have a travel in the middle sit is a nightmare due it my opinion is Embraer and the end-user cost per sit is is 10 percent more cheap than a220.

[@thecaynuck4694]

@@litosertanejo8556 Well, the A220 also has a 2-3 abreast seating, so you can choose to sit in the two seat arrangement. The A220 is still more efficient and costs a fair amount for a modern plane. It's also passed some extreme weather tests, which jungle jets don't excel at.

[@raymond3803]

@SUR CENTRO BRASIL EUROPA DE SUDAMERICA 100 VIDEOS Look pal, no offense, but since Senna died, the country hasn't got much pride. What Tony Kanaan? Couldn't drive a sharp stick up a donkey's ass. And that nose belongs on a wreaker. Get the hook. If he won by a nose, that means he lapped the field. That nose lines up off sides. That nose gets indicted for trespassing. Just be honest....Honda jet is taking market share from Phenom 100 & 300. Brazil is a huge land mass that speaks Portuguese. *WTF?* That's like the United States main language being Samoan. Embraer 3rd rate plane, from 3rd world country.

[@fabios.253]

Not mention to noise and CO2 emissions, curious.

[@eduardos1309]

O E2 tem a multa de menor valor para pousos e decolagens em Heatrow, por ser o mais silencioso de todos. Não é atoa que no pátio de Heatrow o que mais se vê são jatos E-2

[@luisdestefano6056]

Sorry, my wrong. I was thinking about something else. I meant to say that E175 was specifically designed to skip Scope Clauses at 85,200 lb MTOW, just barely below 86,000 lb. A220-100 at 139,000 lb is well in excess, E195E2 at 99,000 lb is just a bit over. Airbus falls within the next bracket of clauses which for AA means a number not to exceed 40% of the mainline narrowbody fleet, and no limit for Alaska. Embraer also falls within these provisions

[@oneskyflyer]

Luis de stefano Thanks for your comment. Well stay tuned for another video about scope clauses and two of the largest aircraft in that class coming next week!

[@erictremblay4940]

Neither the E190/195E2 or the A220 were ever intended to be scope compliant. And they'll never be.

[@user-rc3xs8sq6f]

Smalla and middles jets are goods for regional flights. The best for me is E2.

[@chingweixion621]

Although it seems like the E195-E2 is more efficient and purposely built for the regional operations, upon closer inspection the E2's PW1900G engines are generally higher rated than the A220's PW1500G engines. Since both are the PW1000G engines scaled to different sizes, we can be certain that both engines has identical TSFC since they are both developed during similar times. With this in mind, it would seems that the A220-100 is able to offer lower trip cost and greater range than the E195-E2 jet. Perhaps the biggest advantage of the E2 jets are the larger pool of pilots currently exist whereas the A220 has to built its pool of pilots from scratch as the CRJ still needs to undergo the full certification course.

[@oneskyflyer]

Ching Wei Xion Thanks for your comment. Yep the A220 is certainly a great aircraft though it will require more pilot training and transition times. Anyways both are great small jets. Do stay tuned for another small jet video coming next week!

[@louisduong2090]

why don't you compare the E2 with A220-300? They have similar sizes and seat capacity?

[@oneskyflyer]

Long Duong Thanks for your enquiry. Well in terms of size and list prices, the A220-100 is closer to the largest E2, while the -300 is closer or even exceeds the A319neo. Hope this answers your questions and do consider subscribing if you have not done so so you are alerted of more great future uploads!

[@louisduong2090]

@@oneskyflyer any ideas on why is the Airbus so expensive?

[@onlineo2263]

@@louisduong2090 Airbus and Boeing rarely sell at list price. Ofter upto 50% discount can be given. Embraer price seems to include an already given public discount. So in reality the prices are probably very similar.

[@edwardcasper5231]

The video has an obvious bias. Using the word "better" (which is a subjective term) to describe the cabin of the A220 shows the video's bias, to which it's entitled. So, instead of "asking" which aircraft is "better", it could have simply stated that it favors the A220 upfront, which would have been more honest. Some people might feel that the complete absence of middle seats is "better." To me, "better" depends on what a party needs. For example, a U.S. Airline such as American doesn't need 3400 nm of range to easily fly from Chicago or DFW to anywhere in the "lower 48." The 2650 nm range of the E195 is more than adequate for those missions. However, American may want the flexibility to fly from Miami to Seattle using a large regional jet, so the extra capability of the A220 would be good to have for that mission. My take is that both are great aircraft that cater to slightly different needs. That's how aircraft manufacturers usually do things. Very few aircraft compete with each other head to head. They usually have small differences that fill slightly different needs, and there are always trade-offs that have to be weighed. In spite of its obvious bias, the video did a decent job of pointing out the pros and cons of each aircraft.

[@ianendangan7462]

One thing that the video did not mentioned. It's the aircraft maintenance services, Airbus is popular in the Philippines due to the fact that Singapore is nearby with it's services.

[@caribbb]

Both good planes. Porter just ordered the E2. My personal preference is the A220. For the range it’s not all about trans Atlantic flying, sometimes airlines might just want to go further afield inside their own continent or region. Breeze is one of the rare A220 customer that’s mentioned possibly going trans Atlantic so it’s not really a big factor. The E2 certainly is plane that suits it’s market, maybe even better. However I wish both planes long lasting success.

[@jacopo2677]

I love both🤷🏻‍♂️

[@MarceloAlmeida-mo7re]

Embraer is the best airplanes factory of the world.

[@thecaynuck4694]

No, that's not true. Embraer sucks at making turboprop aircraft and military. Regional jets are okay, only the E-jets, not the E140.

[@MarceloAlmeida-mo7re]

@@thecaynuck4694, you wrote few words, but talked sheat. Congratulations!

[@thecaynuck4694]

@@MarceloAlmeida-mo7re What? Just judging off performance, safety and efficiency as well as political climate of Brazil corruption, Embraer isn't the best.

[@MarceloAlmeida-mo7re]

@@thecaynuck4694 what are you talking? What the fuck? There is not relation between the stuped nazi president of Brasil and the factory of Embraer. The airplanes made in Embraer are never involved with plane crashes. If the american president is a stupid man like you, doesn't makes Boeing worst than Airbus.

[@thecaynuck4694]

@@MarceloAlmeida-mo7re I'm not even American and don't particulary like Boeing, but they are a better company all time. Airbus and Bombardier are the best. And yes, Embraer planes crash. Bandeirante, Brasilia, etc. Your airplanes are getting retired after only 10-20 years of service. Talk about longevity.

[@jr.robertoguedes4047]

A avaliação ESTA TENDENDO para o Airbus que é muito mais rica... Pergunte aos PASSAGEIROS qual a melhor aeronave??? EMBRAER of course!!!

[@JohnAnderson-sq8lt]

The A220 is not a regional aircraft, it is medimum to longer range, can fly to Europe from North America non stop, Embraer is strictly regional

[@fahimfahim1680]

Great information.Thank you.

[@oneskyflyer]

Fahim Fahim Thanks for your comment. Thanks for your support, and I will create more great weekly aviation content so if you have not done so do consider subscribing and stay tuned for more great videos!

[@diabeat4248]

I think @Jagfan1 has it right. Although the A220 can serve relatively well in the regional market, the price makes it less feasible. What plane is the best? It all depends on your mission profile. For me, the E195-E2 makes better sense for the regional market.

[@alanfilipe1398]

E195-E2

[@naubermiranda1025]

The best depends on...best for what?

[@matthewmcloone8314]

The 195 E2 makes more financial sense for the majority of regional airlines. No mention was made on projected service costs between the two. Interesting how it is the larger A220 variant that is getting the most sales...and is probably cannibalizing sales of the A319/320.

[@davirossirosa]

As a passenger I prefer A220, but the E2 is more profitable for the regional airliners.

[@sergiolaurencio7534]

so you like the 2-3 comfiguration?

[@ZaShakur]

I prefer the E195-E2. Even though its range is less than A220, its designer is more attractive. And in terms of economy he also does not lose out.

[@gilsonfigueredolopes3026]

EMBRAER is Best. Great HuG of Brazil.

[@thecaynuck4694]

It's great to be supporting a national aircraft manufacturer, but the facts show that the A220 slightly edges out Embraer. Bombardier and Airbus won.

[@peterguo744]

And if you think the cabin ( e195-e2 ) is good it’s all wrong as most people flew on this aircraft felt they are squeezed. But it’s not the Emb’s problem it’s the airlines problem.

[@claudiomanoeldasilvatucund6567]

@@thecaynuck4694 Wait a Minute... Time Goes By, and Things Change... After watching its main competitor Bombardier receive media attention with the successful C Series, commercial jets that ended up being incorporated by Airbus, and seeing its name involved in the negotiation with Boeing, the Brazilian manufacturer has long needed a good order for its planes. And it came in series, with eight customers closing orders for a total of 300 aircraft that, if confirmed, will generate revenue of no less than 15 billion dollars (almost R $ 60 billion). The most eye-catching deal was announced on Tuesday (17) with the American company Republic Airlines. The regional airline operates flights to the country's three major airlines and is Embraer's largest customer in the United States. No less than 100 E175 jets were ordered, plus 100 purchase options. Detail: this order can be converted to the new E175-E2, a smaller version of the new family, which will start operating in 2021. Another good news is the order of 10 E195-E2 with an option for 10 more planes by the airline Wataniya Airways, from Kuwait. She will be the launch customer for Embraer's new jet in the Middle East. In addition to it, Mauritania Airlines, for example, bought two E175s while Swiss Helvetic Airways closed a deal for 12 units of the E190-E2 with an option for 12 more planes that can be converted to the largest E195-E2. The leasing company NAC acquired three E190-E2 and an unidentified Spanish customer, another three E195-E2 with an option for two more aircraft.

[@matthewmcloone8314]

I've always enjoyed flying on Embraer jets vs the cattle cars of the air the 737s. The 2x2 seating configuration is the main reason, but also the are just so smooth in the air for such relatively small jets. The A220 has three across seating on one side...a huge no for me.

[@joaquimaragao1324]

Both have different target markets. For transatlantic flights, A220 is too small; EMBRAER simply does not target this kind of flight. The 2-2 row system may be preferred by passengers who hate middle seats. Toilet size: how important is it for passengers? And the screen? OK, it is up to the companies to make their calculus. But do not forget political pressures on the companies and their choices!

[@nolimarcelo2038]

For non-trans-atlantic flights, the E195 will be more cost effective for airliners.

[@oneskyflyer]

Noli Marcelo Thanks for your comment. Yep the E195 has slightly lower costs per seat due to its lower acquisition costs in most deals. Embraer, or should that be Boeing Brazil, is likely to give huge discounts on the E2 series of jets as they are not selling as well compared to A220. However, one cannot deny the impressive performance of the A220 which will certainly revolutionise small airplane travel and allow even more new routes and markets to be opened. Thanks for watching and if you have not done so do consider subscribing and stay tuned for more great videos!

[@justsamoo3480]

You can than just use a220-300 version.

[@pw3093]

The maintenance costs, and the associated down time with Embraer is horrendous. They are poorly built aircraft.

[@sergiolaurencio7534]

@@pw3093 this is what happens when you don't study

[@lucasgalvao4411]

E195-e2 the best!

[@ftryio2891]

não

[@lucasgalvao4411]

@@ftryio2891 Não é o seu cu!

[@ftryio2891]

@@lucasgalvao4411 não

[@saifanibnetanbir6144]

Embreaer 195 its efficient and boi that plane is cheap in price only 51 million i would probably have it as my private jet

[@filipilera]

Embraer So muth better!!

[@thecaynuck4694]

Not at all.

[@marcelmoura3576]

E2 better for me.

[@REIBODERA]

Embraer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bombardier/A220

[@kirkykyle2144]

No it's not xD

[@welsondacostaguimaraes3085]

Os dois são lindos não sei qual é o melhor

[@toddw6716]

The E195 is better. The A220 is a waste, cost more with unnecessary range likely never used.

[@justsamoo3480]

Todd Warr You know that this price shown isn’t the price at the end. Plus it’s range could be used on transatlantic low interest routes.

[@dragonfiregijs]

I prefer the embraer as well

[@miguelmig7776]

Airbus: fear to Fly. Prefer embraer

[@cristiovanni]

I wonder if what the real prices are. Maybe they are sold at the same price in the end...

[@karlossargeant3872]

I Love this Video!!!!

[@mstrsrvr]

A220-100 seems to be an overall better plane, but E195-E2 is perfectly suited to regional market.

[@sydnick6696]

If the EMB-75 is an example of Brazillian technology, I would say, "no contest !! "

[@thecaynuck4694]

Doesn't matter whether it's Brazilian, has no impact on how good it is. I'm glad you're proud of your country's company, and they're certainly not bad, but Bombardier and Airbus won here.

[@lifter479]

I believe A220 is better option, because it allows to have wide range of routes keeping single type strategies, and that for sure reduce the cost level. I believe AirBaltic is great example of that, because they can fly directly from Riga to Abu Dhabi, or Helsinki with same type.

[@oneskyflyer]

Maris Rodins Thanks for watching. Yep the pilot training costs are lower with one type of aircraft and there is less maintenance costs. However the A220 is actually more efficient on medium to longer flights where as the E195-E2 is really efficient over the very short domestic routes of say less than 2 hours. Thanks for watching and if you have not done so do consider subscribing and stay tuned for more great videos coming in October!

[@lifter479]

@@oneskyflyer now I am subscribed. Content is really cool and professional. I like it.

[@caufabricio]

Transatlantic operation??? Are you crazy??? E2 is better of course

[@michaelpakel8802]

The A220 is not a regional jet despite its lower passenger capacity. This aircraft is rated for transatlantic flights.

[@neilpickup237]

From a passenger perspective I have flown on both the A220 and the original E jet. All I can say is that the improvements to the E jet will have to be incredible to get even close to the A220. I would however add that many of the positives on the A220 are physically impossible for the E jet to match. Not that I have anything against the E jet and am more than happy when flying on it. I don't know if anyone else flying on the A220 has noticed an awful noise/vibration (it goes right through me and I find it really unpleasant) as the engines spool up - fortunately it isn't present in cruise. Or was that a symptom of what was wrong with the engines - I haven't flown on one since Swiss grounded their fleet for checks to see if it is still there (because of scheduling rather than by deliberate choice)

[@petergajda3732]

Agree that A220 is the more flexible and capable plane. However, domestic or infra-European routes E2 is more than enough and 23% lower price. Perfect for low-cost and domestic/regional airlines.

[@benwingreeff2652]

Now this is q fair comparison

[@mobilidade]

E2 Best Jet

[@arielleblond6201]

If you have already Airbus's planes in your fleet A220 is the one you need. If you're a regional company, Embraer is yours.

[@notproplayer3649]

Yes, I do understand the a220 is really liked by people but for me, the flight I had once on the Swiss a220 was the worst, most uncomfortable flight I ever had while on the Embraer (lot polish airlines) it was really really good, and I flew this specific plane quite a few times (maybe 5 times).

[@paulojapao5553]

E 2.

[@edwardcasper5231]

A better comparison would be to contrast the A220-300 with the E-195-E2, in my humble opinion.

[@fwspatafufo]

E195 E2

[@alexmercer7687]

A220 Looks Better Fly

[@oneskyflyer]

Blue Jade Thanks for your comment. Yep the A220 is a great looking aircraft. It looks like a mini A350! It loves to fly with that nice wing though the smaller -100 is not as efficient as the larger -300 which is also more popular. Thanks for watching yet another of my videos and stay tuned for next weeks video!

[@tigerfoxxtigerfoxx280]

biased...more generous with the bombardier .. any Canadians out there?

[@claudiomanoeldasilvatucund6567]

Nice Joking LoL

[@luisdestefano6056]

A couple of quick comments. Both aircraft saw few sales pending takeovers by Airbus and Boeing. The latter is advancing, yet not complete. The E2 faces an additional hurdle: it does not comply with what is known as the Scope labor clauses since it exceeds 85,000 lb in MTOW, thus making it ineligible in practice for the American market. Its predecessor the E1 on the other hand and A220-100 do comply. Current negociations this year are going nowhere, and the next window of opportunity is in 2023-4, and for now even then prospects are not good. Aside from this both aircraft are technically sound and quite comparable as you mention. Airbus has very recently announced an increase in MTOW that will extend range to an outright extraordinary 3,800 NM, thus opening enticing market opportunities over the North Atlantic, even though at a 10-15% higher cost per seat km over the next bracket of bigger planes.

[@oneskyflyer]

Luis de stefano Thanks for tuning in to yet another video! Wow I honestly did not know that the A220-100 variant with its capability is actually scope clause compliant. By the way do stay tuned for another video coming on that. The A220 did what the Dreamliner did, it will open many new markets in the future. Thanks for watching!

[@erictremblay4940]

The E175E2 is indeed not scope compliant... (too heavy). That's why they keep selling the E175E1 But we're talking about the E195E2 here. Which was never intended to be scope compliant...

[@oneskyflyer]

@@erictremblay4940 Thanks for your comment. Yeah certainly and Embraer is now trying to make the E175 E2 scope clause complaint to compete with a new rebranded jet from the West... Stay tuned for an interesting comparison coming next week!