3D Printed Replacement Part for an F-16 Aircraft: The Cool Parts Show #54

[@AdditiveManufacturing]

Find more from The Cool Parts Show as an All Access member. Sign up for extra videos, plus receive a monthly email with early access to new episodes, commentary from Pete and Stephanie, and ways to interact with experts. Subscribe here: www.additivemanufacturing.media/kc/cool-parts/allaccess

[@user-jk9zr3sc5h]

You two are destined to be featured in some college courses with a wheeled-in TV

[@RuslanKagirov]

Plastics are very sensitive to temperature changes, so material parameters are key in such details.

[@TheTTAM31]

I love The Cool Parts Show!

[@BisdremisKostas]

How would feel knowing that this thing cracks if over torqued?

[@jmd1743]

3d printed parts like that opens the door to more legacy replacement parts being manufactured. Maybe equipment will be used longer because the military isn't beholden to the OEM's will. Maybe not a whole engine but how about landing gear parts or a radar bracket or translucent landing light covers? Little things like that add up to the viability of platforms.

[@abcqer555]

Great video. Funny how they tested every detail under simulation but didn't account for an unknown variable as simple as over torquing it. Did they adjust their design to account for that? Fantastic work by the team and love the qualification loop they designed

[@MarkLawry]

The way I heard it, they DID account for over torquing by providing torque specifications. The problem was that the installer did not follow them. Applying proper torque at installation is fundamental for any mechanic. Especially an aircraft mechanic. And even more so, a mechanic for the Air Force.

[@sl_st]

Very interesting stuff. I am concerned about the following question. Why not make clips? In the sense of locks on the ends of the attachment? To prevent this clamp from opening? So you can make the part even lighter and stronger, relative to the load.

[@AdditiveManufacturing]

From Matt Sanders: "Clips were considered during the design iteration process. In the end, that design concept was eliminated because it was found they were not necessary to achieve the needed strength and would increase the weight and installation complexity."

[@sl_st]

@@AdditiveManufacturing Of course, I understood that you were interrupting a lot of options :) I just wanted to know why this one was dropped. Can I try to make my own variations and put them on GrabCAD? I will be glad if you take a look later;)

[@AdditiveManufacturing]

Sure! Come back and share the link(s).

[@sl_st]

@@AdditiveManufacturing GrabCAD SL_ST PIPE LINE CLAMP

[@AdditiveManufacturing]

Nice work! We didn’t discuss it directly in the episode, but this design reminds us a little of the variation of the clamp visible around 5:36.

[@FilmFactry]

Government loves to waste money. What did this cost? I guarantee in the 60s they did none of this and they used that part for 50-60 years.

[@rebornfenix4412]

This sounds like marketing told the engineers “do something cool with the automagical printy thingy” and the engineers went “hey, the Air Force wants something cool so now marketing will pay us to bs and do something cool.”

[@polyfoamcoats1650]

16:10 It ended up cracking? So it wasn't good after all...

[@AdditiveManufacturing]

The part cracked because of over-torquing during installation, rather than any direct result of the design or material. As we understand it, the properly installed clamp would be a perfectly viable replacement.