Adidas Adizero EVO SL vs Adidas Adizero SL2 | We compare two of the best value versatile daily shoes

[@zaqmailify]

It's simple. SL2 is a sneaker for everyday slow running with the ability to speed up. EvoSL is a fast sneaker for training at a tempo with the ability to do slow jogs. Just choose what you need more.

[@benbauer7866]

Really, the SL2 and Evo SL would be a very nice 1-2 punch

[@nizam_mr]

SL2 is actually a good all rounder shoe, even can handle light trail running due to decent toe bumper overlays

[@caseous69]

Maybe this is more a comment on my own limitations than the shoe’s, but I went from my Novablast 5 to straight into the Evo SL at the local adidas store yesterday, and the NB5 just felt more comfortable for me. Just puts a smile on my face every time I lace them. 😅

[@Majesty_S_Snowbird]

It's not you at all. The EVO SL is just a narrower, faster shoe but the NB5s are wider and a lot more cushioned and stable. Better for your daily runs.

[@CMDV8N3]

@@caseous69 That’s good info. How do they compare?

[@mrne1433]

The Novablast is all about delivering cushioning, comfort and bounce in a daily trainer. I'm pretty sure you'll get similar feelings with any comfort oriented shoes like the Supernova Prima, Nimbus, NB 1080s, or even any Hokas or Skechers. But what you won't get with the Novablast 5 is the world class energy return and resilience from the Lightstrike Pro that is in the Evo SL. Both of these shoes work together quite well.

[@caseous69]

@ I’ve run in lightstrike pro shoes and have a pair of vaporflys. Also own 2 pairs of nimbuses. Novablast is different. It’s not the energy return of a plated super shoe - but it’s also not pillowy comfort like the nimbus. It’s a great balance of fun and comfort, and just makes you happy when you’re running in them… or at least it makes me smile when I run in them. Again, could just be my taste and my ergonomics.

[@caseous69]

@@CMDV8N3 bounces a little more firmly, slightly less comfortable and stable than the nb5 (though not uncomfortable nor unstable), and rocker encourages you to go. And admittedly I prefer the aesthetic of the Evo SL - it looks aggressive in just the right way on foot. It’ll probably run a little faster than the nb5, but the feeling of nb5 makes me happy when I’m running, so I guess the preference is more subjective than objective.

[@paulstarr6001]

I just love my SL2s just a great all-rounder. But im going to buy the Evos and give them a try. Thank you for the video, alway class.

[@Garymanders]

Havent tried the Evo Sl..but i love the SL2 So comfortable totally comfortable on any run great all rounder apart from race day when i step up to a shoe with rods

[@jasonsrunning]

Great video, was hoping for this one - had all but ruled out the Evo SL after finding the SL2 far too narrow for my feet, but it sounds like it might be alright !👍

[@mylesgalos6465]

Getting the sl2

[@scottrobinson4611]

I’ve got average-width feet, but in the SL2 I can’t help but get blisters. I love how the shoe feels underfoot, but it’s quite narrow and rubs the inside of my feet at the ball/knuckle, and leaves nasty blisters. I’ve tried changing lacing, I’ve tried very different socks. Short of wrapping my feet in tape, nothing alleviates this issue. It’s frustrating because otherwise this is a great shoe.

[@jamieoliverjones3775]

I have the exact same problem!

[@rebaxt]

Same here 😢. Did get some improvement by changing the insoles with some old SL20 OG ones... But I did get blisters eventually as well. So I gave up and and I recently got a pair of supernova Rise. Not quite as versatile but my feet are happy again 😊

[@Feanaro5503]

Ouch. No daily trainer is worth that much pain & effort

[@ThomasHubik]

Evo SL or Mizuno Neo Vista for ~4:30 pace? Preferencees are soft bouncy and rockered, doesnt matter if its faster or slower a bit.

[@Angelikagt]

Great review. I just bought the Sl2 and so far love them. But I find the rubber of the outsole to be quiet noisy (I have a hollow foot). How is the outsole of the Evo Sl?

[@AuDHDRunner]

sl has no tongue padding and is a zone 3 shoe. Sl2 has a padded tongue and zone 2 shoe. sl is fun lace bite and sl2 is chill comfort.

[@mohammadshukree572]

perfectly said. watched countless of reviews about the difference, I think people got confused about the label: Daily Trainer :’) what you describe is perfect!

[@charliejareblad]

Just ordered a pair of Superblast 2. Do I need both the EVO SL and the Superblast 2? My purpose with the Superblast is to use it on long runs (20-30km). Can Evo SL handle that as good as the Superblasts?

[@chrixmll]

I did some medium long runs (at least for me) around 24-26km, perfectly fine and fun with the EVO SL, I also have Superblast 2 for 30km+, but I feel EVO SL easily could do this too

[@charliejareblad]

@@chrixmll Thanks man!

[@Kaisersozze]

I got the EVO SL in my TTS and they fit slightly too short for my taste as well compared to my Boston 12s which are TTS. I like a small amount of space in the front and not a 'race fit'. I'll be returning them and waiting again for a release somewhere to pickup half a size bigger. For reference my Asics Superblast 1 are also TTS.

[@vincewarne228]

I’m a big fan of the new Adidas Evo SL, Adios 9 etc.

[@CMDV8N3]

@@vincewarne228 So many great Adidas shoes right now, but in theory, Evo SL maybe cancels out at least three of them (SL2, Adios 9, Boston 12).

[@vincewarne228]

@ - I got the Adios 9, I fancied something lower and lighter for track sessions - I’m in the draw again for the Evo SL which I’m expecting to use in place of Speed 4s when they’ve gone (and wanting less shoe than getting another pair of Superblasts)

[@nicklas6973]

Got the takumi sen 10 on 35% off( cheaper than the adios 9 and evo sl). My first takumi. Compared with my adios 8, ts10 is much better overall. Originally planning on getting either the evo sl or adios 9 for interval/fartlek runs. But since the takumi is cheaper and been wanting to try them since V8, it was an easy decision for me. Upper is spot on for me. It’s like a better vaporfly 2 upper. Midsole stack and geometry works well for me.

[@CMDV8N3]

I found SL2 has absolutely zero arch support and makes my feet roll inward, even with orthotics (which I’ve never had to use before). I’m hoping this isn’t the case with other Adidas shoes I’m interested in line Adios 9, Evo SL and Boston… Anyone have a pov?

[@jeffbarnard348]

Boston is more stable for sure, I had both, it doesn't roll in. I know what you're talking about, although it doesn't bother me as much as I thought it would while running in the SL2. The Evo SL is said to be better in this regard with more foam on the medial side and no aggressive cutouts

[@CMDV8N3]

@ Good info ty. It’s a shame really, love the cushion, love the look, quality is great, but even with arch insoles, I’m still rolling inward. Bummer.

[@jeffbarnard348]

​@@CMDV8N3In fhe SL2? Yeah. Dont try the Takumi then, it's insane and even worse

[@CMDV8N3]

@ Good info, thx.

[@ScrappyCoCo0]

Just ordered the Boston 12 on sale :P

[@user-vi9wl4fh6l]

Which of these 2 shoes is more durable? Is the combination of the foams in the SL2 more durable than the complete light strike Pro mid some in the EVO SL?

[@Kayy_SS]

Am I the only one that like running shoes and wear them daily for everything?? I still have 1080v11, no real complaints about it except I now want more stack height from the shoes so I got myself a pair of 1080v13. But then with the v13, I find it kinda too squishy and somewhat get tired easily from walking on it all day (like it takes more effort to walk if that makes sense). For those who like somewhat max stack/max cushion shoes for all day wearing, which pair are you rocking?

[@JDeezle21]

SL2 rubber sucks in the wet on track and on road besides that the traction in ok but the shoe is good besides that. Likes a higher running pace. Good high school track practice shoe.

[@Jon-hb6gx]

Agree. For recovery days on the wet, I leave it at home and take the Velocity Nitro 2, even though I'd prefer the cushion of the SL2.

[@Garymanders]

Never had a problem in the wet with SL2 have found them grippy in all road conditions..i predominantly a forefoot striker..personally think how our foot hits the ground has a bearing on grip..great we have such a wide range of shoes these days to suit all

[@Jon-hb6gx]

@@Garymanders Hopefully you don't find them slippy at the wrong moment - dodgy turn or dodgy surface or oily section. They are average in terms of outsole grip but average isn't good enough in countries like the UK, I find.

[@i.p2088]

SL 2 had to go up half a size.. Should have gone up a full size..

[@Jon-hb6gx]

Half a size up was enough for me personally.

[@tristanhawkins8699]

I went up a whole size. I had Brooks in a 9 and a 10 in the SL2

[@ntnnot]

Half a size up (8 US) for me was perfect. I fitted in my normal size (7.5 US) but just about; practically no space left. I've read the shoe will give in a little over time, so probably would've been fine for walking, but for running I think a little more space is preferable.

[@AuDHDRunner]

yead sl2 is short and sl it normal/long like the b12. i have 12.5 in both and wish i got a 12 in the evo sl like my b12

[@04mattob]

6:03

[@row33]

SL2 is a good walking shoe that's about it.

[@stefstar.]

Hi Tom, what do you guys consider a heavier runner? Love my B12 and try to get the Evo. Ch.eers