Admiral Gorshkov Class: Deadliest Frigate Ever Built

[@nostradamus2642]

A very well designed and efficiently packaged frigate packing a huge punch for a ship of such a small displacement. Problem is 🇷🇺 shipbuilding capacity is so weak.

[@remliqa]

@@davidnoelfranks1124 Assuming the Russians win, that is.

[@ulikemyname6744]

@@davidnoelfranks1124 So far the advancing direction of the Russian armed forces is backwards

[@tuomasandersson3889]

@@davidnoelfranks1124 yeah, kinda doubt that.

[@lexburen5932]

ship building capacity isnt as weak as you think

[@generalgabrielsatori]

Kiev-class battle carrier and Kirov-class battlecruiser sitting in the corner: *sip wine “You don’t know what they can really do when they’re serious.”

[@JD-dm1uj]

The AG is definitely the best frigate in the world at the moment, even the FFG(X) will fall short of it, unfortunately. I’m surprised the PRC didn’t do more with the Type 054A/Bs.

[@hughmungus2760]

the type054 series were made to be cheap and mass producable since at the time china's navy lacked any modern warships. It set the baseline for the modern chinese navy.

[@felixhanisch4005]

I would rank FFG(X) higher than AG: Constellation has significantly more advanced sensors (Radar and EW), can carry more missiles (due to quad-packing ESSM, which is equivalent/superior to redut and having 16 NSM) and has a significantly superior ASW capability with an Variable-Depth Sonar which AG lacks completely and a SH-60+ MQ-8 combination (SH-60 being a heavier, more capable helicopter than Ka-27)

[@JD-dm1uj]

@@felixhanisch4005 Definitely agree on these points, though it severely lacks in its SSM capabilities, 16x NSMs are decent, though extremely limited range and very antiquated compared to what Russia and China are fielding.

[@EurasiaNaval]

I'm a little surprised the PLAN acquired so many Type 054A frigates as well. I guess they are still quite good for ASW escorts, and are OK in mid-range air defence. Type 054B definitely needs to come soon though

[@franksantos9937]

ßß

[@multipolarworldorder]

Very good journalism and information report

[@johnbodman4504]

It seems to me that the better the missiles, the more relevant these small surface ships are. If Russian frigates can now carry the missile firepower that previously needed a destroyer, then money can be saved and more frigates can be built. There is a lot to be said, by concentrating on numerous surface missile ships and of course submarines, compared to spending money on the hugely expensive aircraft carriers and their escort fleet. As missile quality improves, the more redundant aircraft carriers become.

[@definitelyfrank9341]

Actually very true.

[@MuffHam]

A USA carrier group at maximum alert level. Couldn't stop Russias newest missile. That one Russia lunched at Ukraine and looked like the fingers of God coming down. Traveling at Mach 11 just the kinetic force is enough to cause massive damage.

[@slkiller07]

A long awaited videoMuch appreciated explanation

[@EurasiaNaval]

Glad you liked it

[@milsimmaniac711]

you should do a video on project 22350m "super gorshkov" a larger version of this that russia wants to build

[@EurasiaNaval]

Thanks for suggestion

[@Lalramkumhlunsitlhou25300]

We would also love videos of Indian frigates....as i know india has operated one of the heaviest frigates in the world

[@garyscotman8560]

Excellent presentation , the 3S14 VLS launchers also supports the use of Otvet anti-submarine missiles with a range of 50km carrying either a warhead containing a 400mm depth charge or UMGT-1 electric torpedo.

[@geopoliticsjunkie4114]

Totally happy to have a new video from you . i needed a distraction form watching DPR LPR voting to join Russia.

[@EurasiaNaval]

Thanks for your support!

[@aryankhandelwal787]

Upgraded talwar class will have 8 VLS for brahmos , and 24 for SAM probably shtil1 with 4k ton displacement , tbf now differentiating b/w a frigate and destroyer is getting difficult , we have 6k ton delhi class destroyer and 6.8k ton niligiri class frigate

[@guarana-suquinho]

The truth is that modern Frigates, Destroyers and Cruisers are all sub classes of a same class.

[@SubBrief]

16 VLS, 130mm Gun and some point defense missiles & guns. Greatest ever.

[@asiftalpur3758]

I haven't seen this video yet, but it would be interesting to see a comparison between this and the upcoming Type-54B.

[@kqckeforyou4433]

It is probaly a win for the Gorshkov because newer build one with 32 cell 3S-14 for Kalibr, Onyx and Zircon + the 32 for Air defense (probaly a mix of 24 9M96 and 32 9M100) it will out match it

[@asiftalpur3758]

@@kqckeforyou4433 I'll wait for him to give his views, thanks.

[@kqckeforyou4433]

@@asiftalpur3758 No problem 😉

[@asiftalpur3758]

@@kqckeforyou4433 😊👌

[@EurasiaNaval]

I think it's a little too early to compare the Gorshkov with the Type 054B, given we only have unofficial info or what I consider fairly credible rumours on the Type 054B so far. My opinion is that the Admiral Gorshkov should still retain much better surface-to-surface firepower with its long-range ASCMs including the Tsirkon that will enter service soon, but the Type 054B should be more suitable for area air defence, particularly if it uses the Chinese UVLS as I believe it will.

[@gimme88]

im really glad i found this channel, it is VERY interesting!!! 8D

[@cam35mm]

This seems like a good platform to build off of. longer and what seems a shorter profile. But then again it seems that all their armament is in the bow, the problem of putting all their eggs in one basket. If the bow takes a hit might take out the whole system.

[@kentony7672]

How many RBS15 can it withstand before going to accompany papa Moskva considering this missile has been widely deployed in Baltic region.. I bet it won't exceed a couple.

[@struvrim7637]

@@kentony7672 The ship that Moscow, back in 1994, should be scraped, because she was already obsolete at that time, for Russia it was basically a loss of reputation As for RBS15, then N missiles * the probability of their interception, everything is exactly the same as in any other ships of any countries, but after the first missile there will be a casus beli and the question immediately arises whether can Stockholm, together with all the inhabitants and infrastructure, can withstand againts 16 thermonuclear charges 2 megatons each, which this ship is designed to carry in zircon format. There is reason to believe that the maximum is zero, taking into account all possible air defense. In terms of strategic destructive power, this is a very powerful frigate (although I think that everything directly and directly goes just to the fact that all parties will use destructive force even before construction is completed, ruining the entire civilization, but this is my opinion) And so, if nevertheless this does not happen by some miracle, then reducing the size of ships and increasing their striking power is a trend that all countries will follow. It's much better to have a bunch of these frigates than a lot fewer capital ships. This strategy works everywhere, as technologies get to stuffing anti-ship missiles into tens of thousands of stealth drone boats made of plastic, warships will simply be floating docks for such boats, most likely also automatic, and all the situation, guidance and control will be transferred to satellites (which in mostly owned by the leader of an alliance). Drones will also conduct anti-submarine warfare, just like the boats themselves will also be drones, and on this the era of warships, even of this size, will go into the background

[@jerromedrakejr9332]

@@kentony7672 If I'm not mistaken, the Russian Ministry of Defense made an official statement that the ship sank due to a fire caused by the crew's error! You have some new information, that that ship was sunk by a missile!?

[@fanaticcoder3320]

@@struvrim7637 Even the overpriced wunderwaffe zummwalt will go down after 1 hit. I don't think even carrier would survive 1 hit from modern AShM. The key is don't get hit, use decoy, EW, interceptor anything but try not to get hit.

[@shmeckle666]

This ain’t no FFG this is a light guided missile destroyer lmao.

[@EurasiaNaval]

Yes, I agree!

[@Deliryczny]

Seriously? A medium-sized frigate with average radar and missile equipment is the "deadliest"? Its only advantage is the Zircon rackets. There is no comparison to the more advenced frigates like Spanisch F100, Australian Hunter, Frech-Italian Horizon et cetera, cetera...

[@definitelyfrank9341]

Horizon class is a destroyer, idiot.

[@zachdebuhr6347]

This whole account seems like it's extremely biased towards Chinese and Russian designs. The kinzhal failure should be proof enough that Russian hypersonic is a joke

[@ActLikeABitch]

​@@zachdebuhr6347Patriot get destroyed must be a joke SAM😂. US and Nato lost in afghan war prove that Western military equipment is a joke and garbage😂. Look at leopard 2a6 also a flying turret😂.

[@ActLikeABitch]

​@@zachdebuhr6347sent a video khinzal got shot down😂. Only claim by ukraine with fake khinzal piece😂

[@soulofnature6537]

🤣😂Where is proof of Kingal got shot down nowhere and before you show any just 1 fake video don't forget to prove that it has Kingal in it or ship Moskva I seen them them fakes anyway Ukraine uses they old almost similar looking ship but not the same size and burn it for a prime video because it was old and it cost to much to renew and 3rd country like Ukraine can have ships not enough money because they beg none stop USA for USD and tech all destroyed in 7+ years lol hahaha Kingal hit all the military UKRnazi buildings as all videos show whole world seen it

[@kamikaze.7607]

Can u plz make a video on South Korean Sejong the great class destroyer.

[@Senbonzakura776]

really like the design of the ship

[@slkiller07]

Can you please do video about future Lider-Class destroyer?

[@EurasiaNaval]

I think a lot is still up in the air around the project 23560... it's not clear whether it will definitely happen given the preferences given to the Super Gorshkov

[@slkiller07]

@@EurasiaNaval thanks for the update👍

[@alexandrejosedacostaneto381]

While this ship is very impressive, will Russia have the industrial capacity to mass produce them? Specially now that Russia's economy and budget will be taking a major hit from sanctions and mobilization, and now that other branches of the military will become a priority? Russia needs Fixed and Rotary wing aircraft, MBTs, IFVs, APCs in massive numbers, not to mention the costs of paying, feeding and housing the millions of reservists. Will they have the budget necessary to keep building them? We are talking about a military budget increase of several times, while overall government revenues are plumeting. Russia will need to cut some of their investiments, and I think the navy might be the choice of budget cuts.

[@jerromedrakejr9332]

They don't plan to mass produce any of their ships... They plan to build 15 of these frigates, they have built 3, they are building 5, and when they finish those 5 they will start the next 5... and that's it. Everything is as they planned, they don't have any problems there.

[@pierceplaysstudios245]

Yes. They plan is to have 15. 2 are in the navy, Another just complete its trials, And another 5 are under construction

[@muhammadhuzaifaazam]

How would this compare to the new 054B and the PNS Tughril type frigates? Make a video please

[@nilanjangupta763]

Are those indigenously manufactured or the Chinese just threw a watered down export version of the Type 54?

[@EurasiaNaval]

It's a little too early to compare the Gorshkov with the Type 054B, given we only have unofficial info or what I consider credible rumours on the Type 054B so far. My opinion is that the Gorshkov should still retain much better surface-to-surface firepower, but the Type 054B should be more suitable for area air defence, particularly if it uses the Chinese UVLS as I believe it will.

[@muhammadhuzaifaazam]

@@EurasiaNaval and how about the Tughril class of frigates?

[@EurasiaNaval]

@@muhammadhuzaifaazam Definitely superior to the Type 054A/P in every single way, in my view

[@robertcameron3455]

Great ship for the mighty Russian navy

[@Bonygasse]

The Russian Navy has always been a stepchild of the armed forces. Today more than ever.

[@SuperpowerBroadcasting]

The Zircon is one of the best arguments for why NATO needs to increase its defence spending big time

[@MuffHam]

It's funny NATO spends 1.2 trillion on defense. Russia as of 2024 spends 165 billion. Why is NATO so scared of a single country. Which has 1/4 the budget of USA. NATO also has almost a billion people. Yet Russia only has 160ish million. So why dose NATO think Russia is such a threat.

[@McRocket]

I think Russia needs to start paying more attention to training their personnel. And overhauling both their military and their government. Rather then building more 'stuff'. Take the sinking of the Moskva? It got hit by 2 missiles without firing a shot. It did not even detect the incoming missiles. Apparently, because the radar detection desk was not even manned. As were many, other posts. Either unmanned or poorly manned. Russia has plenty of military technology. And there is NO POINT in building great, new ships. If they are not going to be manned and operated properly. The problem is their military organization is a mess. And their (and Russia's) leadership is in desperate need of overhauling. Fix the top first. Then worry about building stuff for it. Thank you for this video. ☮

[@locoman888]

Potentially penetrate air defense? Try 100% penetrate its mach 9.

[@scottcornford1644]

and all this can be undone by a man and his cigarette

[@aib0160]

As with most Russian made hardware they look great on paper but found wanting in actual combat.

[@aib0160]

@4den Planes and helicopters shot down, missiles that are woefully inaccurate, air space regularly breached by Ukrainian activity and their navy moved out of harms way following the sinking of the Black Sea flagship. The Russian army has little to do with any of that?

[@aib0160]

@4den Well it was you blaming the army, I was just pointing out that Russia's losses and poor performance isn't just their army. Their equipment has proven to be crap as have their tactics. But you carry on with the insults if that makes you feel better. That is something the Russians are good at, just like fighting unarmed civilians and rag-tag armies of the third world.

[@bobsagget823]

@4den406 cope loser

[@jerromedrakejr9332]

@@aib0160 Five months later... the mighty German Leopards and American Bradleys in Ukraine burn better than fireworks, and just these days a video of a Russian T-90, which ran over several mines and was hit several times by AT missiles but sill continued with its movement and execution of the task became super popular! Or, for example, a video of a Russian Ka-52 repelling the attack of several anti-aircraft missiles, or a video of another Ka-52 whose tail was blown off by a projectile, but which calmly continued its flight and returned to base. Compilations of the destruction of HUGE amount of NATO equipment by Russian drones, helicopters and precision artillery shells are also very popular! So much for poor Russian and superior US weapons!

[@aib0160]

@@jerromedrakejr9332 Tell me what you're on as I want some of that.

[@paulsteaven]

On paper, the Gorshkovs were the best frigate afloat. But sadly, they're in service with the Russian Navy that has a reputation of badly maintaining its ships.

[@jamesmandahl444]

Nah it us pretty impressive. Getting tired of the thick anti ruskie propaganda

[@witika7151]

I would'nt say that. Reality speaks better than words. Look at the Moskva it sunk because it was sent out in poor condition with its defence technologies was not working. Look at the akula months before the US could not locate it in the Atlantic. Now it was spotted off the coast off Norway. Did US technology improve over 4 months or is the akula not being mantained properly hence it's stealth being deterioriated.

[@chance1113]

@@jamesmandahl444 if you look at it from another pov, given the russians relatively small military budget compared to the US and china, it's only logical that they would struggle to maintain a lot of equipment. servicing a military that requires a large yet elite navy, army and air force on such a poultry budget...it's only inevitable that there are going to be major holes when it comes to general upkeep and training. dude mentioning the sinking of the movska and the spotting of the akula is right. heck even vostok 2022 they couldn't even send more than a quarter of the ships they had announced to participate. i think the criticism is fair

[@mrmacias4217]

It’s a brand new ship there’s a different between a ship from the 70s and 2022 😂 you fool

[@paulsteaven]

@@jamesmandahl444 it's not an anti-ruskie propaganda when theres a leaked report on how badly the Russian Navy maintained their former Black Sea flagship.

[@allgood6760]

Sleek and chic 👍

[@Milovan-c9x]

KZbin💩 hypocrites gott all butthurt about my comments on Ryssian technology and blocked my comments.

[@amirhoseynkhanbabaei1367]

Where's 2CIWS kashtan or palma????

[@Yourlocalhuman8]

Instead, replaced with Palash CIWS

[@amirhoseynkhanbabaei1367]

@@Yourlocalhuman8 oooooO yes palash . Tankyou sir🙌

[@FahrurRoziqin]

so it has Very good anti air missile, with Anti submarine detection and torpedo, And equipped with Hypersonic missile too? YEP!

[@filipzietek5146]

0:43 Beutifull ship 😭😭😭

[@johnord684]

Its a wonder is dosn't have oars

[@SuperSanic..]

I don't believe in russian specs anymore.

[@jamesmandahl444]

Nah they are pretty legit. You and I have been thru some of the most intense propaganda campaigns seen in human history. Not all is as it seems. Dont just assume what you hear regarding Russia is always true, whether good or bad.

[@DairyCat]

Specs are fine. But corruption has severely impacted maintenance of their ships and sanctions have probably made it even worse.

[@Jman-uz6gp]

@@jamesmandahl444 No they really are not. Is now known Russia inflates all its military specifications and capabilities.

[@ronniefarnsworth6465]

HHHHhhhaaaa just more Russian "Paper Tiger" JUNK !!!!! Semper Fi

[@lokesh303101]

Yes!

[@debratakahara2494]

Ah yes, was expecting the Russian troll bots to be out in force and they didn’t disappoint. On paper very impressive ship and I’m a fan. Impressive weaponry. However long term maintenance and crew training are probably questionable as is a recurring theme with the Russian military. Also its weaponry may be impressive but it’s electronic systems and radars don’t come close to the latest Aegis systems. This ship would never get close enough to an opposing naval force to launch its missiles to begin with. Carrier launched F35’s would sink her before she knew what hit her.

[@ExAnalogia]

Send it to Ukraine and Admiral Gorshkov will become a permanent underwater memory of failed Russia ships.

[@airlightshockZOV]

They did, and yet here it still fights and yet still it’s bombing ukraine with moskits and zircons

[@clausjensen5658]

As with any russian war-materiel alot can be said. Often not much good. With the pisspoor performance in Ukraine in mind I remain very doubtfull that this Frigate can do all it intends to do. Even so , with all this technology apparantly modern and all. If the training of the crew does´nt match this. Then overall performance might not be as high as expected. Apparantly the Moscow the flagship of the black sea fleet , was so badly maintained only one of the 4 CIWS worked. The radar interfered with communications . And all firefighting gear was locked away due to the crew apparantly stealing it. It was despite all that considered battleready enough to fight. If the conditions are so bad on what should be the pride of the black sea fleet. Then I highly doubt that the effective fighting capabilities of this ship match up with what it should be able to do on paper. All the information about the Moscow was from another youtuber Lazerpig. On another note is´nt it strange that every Russian navy video of exercises never show the crew in battlegear. No flak wests , no helmets. Would´nt it make sense to train as you would actually fight? Also from what I have heard, Russia never put much thinking into the design of operating surfaces of their combat systems. If you expect a soldier to look at a radar screen or weapons-computer 8-10 hours a day atleast make the screen layout , colours and what else you can. As easy and less tireing as possible to avoid fatigue and minimize chances of errors being made. My point really is that the ship might be very good. But if the crew is shit then what´s reality of it´s capabilities.

[@kqckeforyou4433]

Well lets Say the Operator because the crew can be good but the rest can be shit

[@clausjensen5658]

@@kqckeforyou4433 Fair enough.

[@kqckeforyou4433]

@@clausjensen5658 Thanks but with the rest your right and its kinda sad to have one of the Super Powers of this world in a state like this

[@mrmacias4217]

Are all Lazer pig fans this stupid? like I knew y’all were braindead but this is a different level of stupidity 😟

[@320jasont]

Like all Russian military hardware it's a lot of firepower and more then likely a lot of flaws that will cause it to flounder in the real world.

[@taiwanstillisntacountry]

This channel is so much better then that frog-channel with the fake "Russian" accent. That channel is so biased. At least you try not to

[@val91122]

may I ask what channel is that?

[@chance1113]

@@val91122 he's talking about binkov. tankies hate him because he's honest about russian and chinese military equipment (aka mostly trash in russia's case and mostly untested and trash in china's) whereas this channel is basically a hype machine for russian and chinese military hardware lol. not that i have a dog in this fight but the comment sections are always hilarious especially since this channel proclaimed the movska as some unstoppable beast yet it got sunk by the ukrainians embarrassingly

[@taiwanstillisntacountry]

Binkov's battleground

[@EurasiaNaval]

Haha thanks for your support. I actually find Binkov's videos on Chinese naval and air power to be not too bad. He makes an attempt to be impartial, and what he says is defensible, although he does stay on the more conservative side in terms of PLA asset numbers and capabilities. For example, in his recent video on the surge in Chinese combat aircraft production, I think he undercounted the J-15 and H-6K/J/N numbers somewhat, but the estimates he presented for other aircrafts were defensible. He clearly tries to get hold of the correct sources, or have people working for him that scour Chinese language forums. I can't speak for Binkov's videos on Russian equipment or military affairs though, because I haven't watched many of his videos on that topic, and I know far less about Russian capabilities in general.

[@taiwanstillisntacountry]

Very anti-China, i think. His comments are through the roof anti-China. Critic is ok, pure hate is bad. He cant do anything about that but still annoying. But thanks for trying to be un-biased.

[@sergiodesouzajunior3962]

Compro a fragata toda 80 trilhões manda para a base do rio de janeiro Niterói brasil marinha

[@brianfoley4328]

The loss of the Moskva (Slava class Cruiser) changes many of our ideas on the effectiveness of Russian systems. While it is easy to blame the Captain and crew, there are deeper issues that need more discussion. Frigates are by design, smaller warships that are usually tasked with the outer perimeter defense of the fleet, but the Russian Navy has a different take on that idea. The newer Russian Frigates are really scaled down Destroyers, in that their mission is a balance between offense and defense. The Admiral Gorshkov class Frigates are fine ships but suffer from the attempt to be the "Jack-of-all-Trades" and master of none. The threat facing the Russian Navy comes from surface, air and submarine launched missiles and torpedoes. The Admiral Gorshkov is an impressive looking Frigate that is ill equipped to fight in the modern weapons environment, it's small size makes it vulnerable to loss from relatively light damage...it takes highly trained crews and a certain amount of "bulk" and water tight compartmenting to survive missile strikes...the Admiral Gorshkov has too little air defense capability, too little "bulk" and given the experience of the Moskva little chance of survival in modern combat.

[@Khalid_Looby]

thats any ship tbh, todays attack is stronger than defense tech. look at russia can use their hyper sonic missiles and destroy literrary all usa navy lol.

[@bobsagget823]

@@Khalid_Looby cope more loser

[@definitelyfrank9341]

Yeah, they should focus on building single-purpose $4.5 billion dollar ships that can are only armed with artillery guns that fire $800,000 rounds.

[@brianfoley4328]

@@definitelyfrank9341 Yeah...but when your Navy's budget is two and a half times larger than the entire Defense budget of your nearest peer competitor you can afford to "experiment".

[@definitelyfrank9341]

@@brianfoley4328 A retard would know that ship is useless, you can't avoid the truth.

[@sergiodesouzajunior3962]

Compro a fragata toda por 700 trilhões manda para a base do rio de janeiro Niterói brasil marinha

[@Cydonius1]

Must look great on paper, then again the Moskva was awesome too and it's point defence kinda forgot to work and it's damage control was non-existent

[@BoleDaPole]

Moskvas flaw was it's fire fighting capability and overall age No wonder it was due to be scrapped next year.

[@mindaugasstankus5943]

@@BoleDaPole BS, had repair/maintenance/upgrades done (one paper looks like mostly) to server another decade or two.

[@milosmilictrob2046]

@@mindaugasstankus5943 Nope it didnt, it was supposed to have, but lack of funding denied it an modernization in those areas.

[@lexburen5932]

kinda lame comparing an old ship wich the moskva was. against a brand new one

[@bobsagget823]

@@lexburen5932 cope

[@SergioLuizCardosodeSouzaJunior]

Compro 30.000 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil Rio de Janeiro

[@aberry2521]

Maybe their opponents will use drones to good effect like they have in Ukraine.

[@sergiodesouzajunior3962]

Compro 500 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil rio de janeiro

[@nobodyherepal3292]

Well then, come a little closer to the Ukrainian coast then, if you think your frigate would tough…..

[@multipolarworldorder]

The new torpedo is a great asset for attack and defense

[@kqckeforyou4433]

Well it doesn't matter how good it is if the Goverment of this ship doesn't know how to use it. Doesn't matter which goverment

[@dafonsecaaugustojose4423]

It has nothing to do with weapons, I am wondering where you guys leave your brains when listening or your are just all about talk?????

[@kqckeforyou4433]

What's the problem?

[@taiwanstillisntacountry]

The mightiest army of the world of 1950 couldnt defeat a rice peasants army and the poorest of the world. In Vietnam war, the p00r USA army was again the stronghest and mighties army of the world. The rice-peasant army of Vietnam is pissing their pants of laughing. The stronghest NATO army under USA command invaded Afghanistan to bring demon-crazy, human-abuse and free-dumbs and failed. 20 years of occupation and Afghanistan still 1 of the poorest country in the world. Yes, poor USA is a beacon of failure.

[@kqckeforyou4433]

Well in case you wrote Something i can't see it

[@kqckeforyou4433]

@@dafonsecaaugustojose4423 It has. A System has two crucial elements. The System itself and the Operator. As we have no 100% unmanned object ( because at somepoint a human started it or deactivated it) everything falls under this. It doesn't matter how good a weapon is if the Operator can't use it full pontential. Sry for my Bad Englisch xD

[@stuartgooding7295]

they sink .very well tho don't they 🤣🤣

[@InfinityRedXX]

The super gorshkov is essentially a mega cruiser.

[@danielolsson4]

Russias military stuff is always "best" before it's used in combat...

[@leecheong4986]

The PLA should put YJ21 hypersonic missiles in the new 054B frigate and mass produce it.

[@azbgames6827]

Russia would be better off building more of these instead of trying to keep those ancient Soviet Cruisers, Destroyers and the Kuznetsov alive. These are probably more combat effective than the Sovremenny class or Slava class considering what happened to the Moskva.

[@marvinc5961]

Lmao😂is that why they don’t park it next to Ukraine? It’s too deadly? 😂😂

[@definitelyfrank9341]

Because that isn't smart?

[@collinwood6573]

@@definitelyfrank9341 what’s the point of having a navy if you send its best ships on intimidation cruises rather than have them fight in the war you are actively engaged in?

[@definitelyfrank9341]

@@collinwood6573 Because they aren't part of the fleet nearest to the enemy they're fighting, and they really have no need to put such a high value target there. They already have missile boats which are much lower value targets and can get the job done.

[@kentony7672]

How many RBS15 can it withstand before going to accompany daddy Moskva..

[@jerry4251]

why don't Russia get rid of that k827 is nothing but a old piece of garbage

[@Carlos-cy4uc]

Very funny everything

[@beachcomber3036]

REMEMBER MOSKVA? - - POOTIN

[@twiz148]

Its been 8 months since this was posted. Anyone want to bet whether this thing still runs? My money is that its in dry dock indefinitely by now. 😁

[@definitelyfrank9341]

Still runs, give me your money.

[@fgtrhwu2]

This ship has been running for some time

[@pierceplaysstudios245]

It was the flagship of russia's Mediterranean fleet parade on Navy Day

[@garyb5998]

😂 😂 😂 😂 😂.... I hope Cigarettes are banded on board.... Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦 💪

[@alexkor380]

Sebilam slava. Svalka - ukraina.

[@undertaker21-18]

Good Joke 🤣🤣🤣

[@sorinvasile9238]

ha ha ha ha best one year a go befor de war

[@sergiodesouzajunior3962]

Compro 1.000 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil

[@fabiosarti8959]

🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

[@richardmoskalyov8503]

They just copied the chinese

[@Pepe-dq2ib]

Typical Russian bote, its a jack of all trades. It is better to have Frigates specialized for a task.

[@definitelyfrank9341]

How did your multi-billion-dollar, single-purpose Zumwalt go?

[@LuqmanHM]

I want to argue, Iver Huitfeldt and De Zeven Provincian are much better than AG

[@raisef8622]

🍒😊

[@extremumadventura]

Ukrainian drones deadliest weapon in Black Sea