Advanced AI Wavetables, Convolution, and Time-Domain Splicing Wavetables in KRC Mathwaves

[@SouthShoreSonics]

I love what you are doing. Damn the haters!

[@kcrosley]

Thanks! 🎉❤😂

[@AviPFine]

Awesome sounds. Really like the math explanations too.

[@crossan77]

Bitwig user here, its been fun exploring your wavetables. And getting explanations makes it easier to find my way around them. More talking is good.

[@kcrosley]

Thanks for the feedback, @crossan77! Definitely check out the other videos in my KRC Mathwaves playlist, if you haven’t. The first two have a lot more info on how the core wavetable set is constructed. kzbin.info/aero/PLrpwUaHrI9tOHSLCcPc_pDjelYK1fYcoQ&si=BgteLKsOiDY97Go0

[@gen-amb]

I don’t think you should expect anything except disdain from 80% or more of people who self select themselves to leave a comment. Sadly there are people who never say anything constructive no matter what, they want to throw their little brick, and they believe their own missing knowledge (which they aren’t aware of) is only proof of yours. Thanks for all the effort in these, this is a really cool resource!

[@kcrosley]

Well, a hearty "hey there!", @actualkevin! Thanks for your kind words. Agree with what you say... I do think that people (myself included) are a bit quick to "throw the first stone" as it were. But some really misunderstand my project and I do wonder if that's on me (e.g., should I be more explicit about what I'm up to here?). Had a review today from an *actual customer* who spent less than an hour with the product and was baffled by how there were thousands of "sine wave" sounding tones... It's like, c'mon dude, figure it out .🤷‍♂ Of course, they hadn't seen any of the videos and were expecting a bunch of "FM wub" type shit. Sigh. Anyway, thanks for watching and listening, and go make some amazing sounds! (In case anyone's actually reading this, the amount of content in KRC Mathwaves is larger than most orchestral sample libraries and, laid end-to-end, the single-cycle frames that make up these wavetables would take several days to listen to. (And, the listener would have a giant headache after all of that.) It's safe to say that no human being (myself included) has heard the entirety of this library and it's unlikely that anyone ever will. You either get it, or you don't, I suppose. Thanks for "getting it", @actualkevin! (Aside: The KRC Mathwaves waveforms, particularly the VAE [machine-learning waveforms] are actually excellent for making FM wub shit, it's just not baked into the wavetables themselves. One would use various other synthesis features to do that. Again, 🤷‍♂) Cheers, Your old pal Keith from www.wavetables.lol

[@kdsf12]

Can I use some of these wave tables on a Chord V2?

[@kcrosley]

Hey @kdsf12, the QuBit Chord V2 expects wavetables that are 64 total frames with each frame being 256 samples in length (as stated in the manual static1.squarespace.com/static/56feccc7a3360c08ffa34ed4/t/63482c5c5d46cb5b3c5d99eb/1665674335596/QB_Chord.pdf#page16), and likely 16-bit. This is the format of the original version of WaveEdit, BTW. My wavetables are 2048-samples per frame at 32-bit and they might have any number of frames, not exceeding 64… HOWEVER, you’re in luck because I’m converting the entire collection to the “WaveEdit” format right now. There’ll be a WaveEdit version of the free collection as well as WaveEdit versions in the full collection. I might be uploading those tonight, but definitely by the end of day tomorrow they’ll be available. 🎉

[@kdsf12]

Awesome! @@kcrosley

[@kcrosley]

@@kdsf12 in the full commercial collection you'll find a section labeled "👇👀 WaveEdit (256 samples-per-frame, 64 frames) Format Wavetable Collections 👇". That's what you're looking for. Also, in the free version you'll find WaveEdit versions now. This is getting a bit insane now. 🤷‍♂

[@kcrosley]

Thanks for your support! 🎉❤