This is because most people don't understand C2. The Intent is a fully qualified part of Command and Control. C2 still work better than anything else, if you understand it. It even includes Systems Thinking, LEAN, agile methods and others, while the golden thread remains a hard C2 - Without that you may get what is possible and even may get what you need, but not what you want, while having the benefits of successful other and newer ways of leading. So the big question is, do you actually need what you want or are you happy with something that is successful. Think carefully, if you are ready to give up on the exact imagination of what you want, because if you are not ready to let your team lead as the team, then better stick to a solid C2 core. To give an example in real life: Countries cannot give up on a C2 core if they want to prevail, it would lead to a spectrum that is too wide to remain control, borders and all that defines contries would fall apart little by little - It would lead sooner or later to a one nation world with a huge diversity and an extreme spectrum of offer and demand and the appearance of isles of all kind, even non-related to geographical positions. Now companies have basically the same thing going on, just in another scale and in a complete different environment (still) - I have seen leaders that want to change, those who want to accept or try out new ways, but aren't ready within their mindset or aren't ready to give up on the initial idea. Again, if you cannot give up on your idea, stay with C2.
@achimmeyer9889 Жыл бұрын
I am not sure I can or want to follow. To me your comment reads a lot like you did not really listen to the content of this video: maybe try to prioritize understanding what you hear? "C2 still work better than anything else, if you understand it." sounds a lot like a dogma to me -- obviously methods have advantages and disadvantages. Maybe you want to read up on what was mentioned in the talk: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect