After 17 years behind bars, could Scott Peterson actually be innocent? | Dan Abrams Live

Remember Scott Peterson?
17 years ago he was convicted and received the death penalty for killing his wife, Laci, and their unborn child, Conner. Well, he was re-sentenced today to life in prison without parole. This after his death sentence was overturned by the California State Supreme Court.
Attorney Terri Austin and Criminal Defense attorney Mark Eiglarsh join Dan to reason why Scott did or didn't do it.
Full Story: www.newsnation...
#scottpeterson #mistrial #murderer
Dan Abrams Live brings a fresh, no-holds-barred approach to covering and analyzing the news.
NewsNation is your source for fact-based, unbiased news for all America.
Find us online: www.newsnation...
Get our app: bit.ly/3AbFrG3
Watch us on TV or via streaming: bit.ly/3oxRmf5

[@Ron4T1]

After watching an interview with the jurors on that case, it became clear that they convicted him because the media said so.

[@sophie8394]

Whatever 🙄

[@andrearosario8512]

They also wanted to impress Strawberry Shortcake. All those white juror dudes were mad simpin'.

[@sarahdemers4929]

100% agree!

[@kaybaron5179]

Your on drugs this.man is as guilty as hell

[@Jbf-76]

No, it's actually because he's a narcissistic, sociopath who murdered his wife, and kid. That's why. Let me guess. You didn't see the actual trial? You what, 21? Get a grip, dudes not getting out. He's a murderer. Get over it. Stoo watching dumb shows.

[@greekgirl9897]

It's SHOCKING to learn how many leads were NOT investigated and witnesses whom were NOT questioned!

[@sophie8394]

People who claim to have seen Laci when they know for a fact that Scott was still at home were not credible and the police were not going to waste precious time on bogus sightings. If you think witnesses and leads were not followed up on, you don't know much about this investigation.

[@laneybobs8157]

What leads? What witnesses?

[@sophie8394]

@@laneybobs8157 they all say it but none of them can answer the question.

[@laneybobs8157]

@@sophie8394 exactly. Bunch of BS artists!

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

Greekgirl, you've had 2mos to answer this question. Why make your comment if you can't even answer the question.

[@rosegarten4389]

There was so much evidence against him the first time, just because he’s been in prison for 17 years doesn’t suddenly make him innocent! Millions wasted on this guy.

[@Neelia35]

My thoughts exactly

[@dawndubsky4641]

There was no "evidence" he killed anyone. It came down to opinion only. And since he was definitely a lying, cheating, jerk, why not execute him. Personally, I THINK he did it, but that's not proof. The system needs to work.

[@sophie8394]

@@dawndubsky4641 if there wasn't any evidence there would never have been a trial. That's what an evidentiary hearing is for .

[@dawndubsky4641]

Just because he's spent 17 years in jail doesn't make him guilty. Our system has proved that over and over. I'm not saying he's not quilty; I just want actual proof. Many people are in jail on circumstantial evidence. There should just be a block on the death penalty for cases without factual evidence. It's been proven time and again that personal witness testimony is biased and not fact. I actually went thru the trial and saw/heard nothing but hearsay. It's the system I'm concerned about...not Scott Peterson. Please don't be naive.

[@sophie8394]

@@dawndubsky4641 what do you mean, you went thru the trial?

[@TruckieLooks4Aliens]

Fact driver?? Unbiased coverage?? What I just watched was not only biased but it scares me that these ppl are experts. As a woman of color who was wrongly arrested and I did settle with the city, a fair trial to every person means a lot to me. I watched the trial. There’s so much evidence that was excluded and little evidence aside from him being a cheater that was presented. There was a home robbery across the street. The mailman was left out. Aside from having an affair, where’s the evidence. The guy on the right is aggressive and I don’t trust people who can’t even look at things down the line. I couldn’t understand why he was convicted. The police should not have released his alibi. How does her body after 4 months remain exactly in the same place? They should’ve kept his alibi a secret. Why don’t they go down each single piece of evidence and tips that was left out?? Bc they just “feel” he’s guilty. That’s the problem with jury’s too… they “feel” vs evidence.

[@sophie8394]

You watched a trial that wasn't televised? How did you manage that? The BURGLARY theory has been deemed by the court to have no merit. The burglary happened on the 26th. Proven. What do you mean the mailman was left out? Bc that's what the documentary told you? That was just one of their many lies. The mailman, Russell Graybill testified. In fact he testified that nothing was out of the ordinary at the Peterson home that morning. Laci's body wasn't in the same place. Not sure where you're getting that. She washed ashore less than 2 miles from where Scott was fake fishing. Loosened from her weights during a storm the night before and carried by the tide.

[@jbizzle4201]

Exactly! They are basically saying I was there and only my opinion counts. There are definitely things that makes him look suspicious. However, he should not have been convicted based off the effidence they presented. The cops were caught in lies on the stand, the D.A was caught lying in court. As soon as they brought Amber Frye in everyone convicted him. ( she was basically an undercover cop)The media coverage was CRAZY! He didn't speak to them so they vilified him. He agreed to both searches, but wanted his lawyer to look at a document before the second one. They said he was no longer cooperating. The jury was highly suspicious , and acted atrociously after the trial, and during deliberation. I do find it very suspicious to drive an hour and a half to go fishing just to get out on the water for an hour, on Christmas with a pregnant wife. He traded her truck 2 weeks after she went missing. Which shows he didn't think she was coming home. So I am not saying he is innocent. However, it is TERRIFYING the way the media acted in this case and the way the jury, and police handled themselves. We have standards for a reason, and they didn't live up to them in my opinion.

[@glynisparry3894]

Agreed

[@raquellambropoulos279]

Well there was the pliers with her hair. The 4 cement blocks . The irony of her remains found where he was fishing and the baby. You need more ??

[@glynisparry3894]

No dna on the hair as It had no root and could have belonged to any female with dark hair at that time - no proof of cement blocks - the whole of America knew where Scott went fishing and therefore could easily have tried to frame Scott - No hard evidence at all

[@Dark_Helmet734]

Several witnesses in the neighborhood saw Laci alive during the time Scott supposedly killed her

[@sophie8394]

None of the witnesses were viable and none could be corroborated.

[@Dark_Helmet734]

@@sophie8394 They corroborate eachother yet the police just put blinders on and ignored them

[@sophie8394]

@@Dark_Helmet734 false. Most of them claim to have seen Laci at a time when Scott was still at home and Laci was supposedly mopping floors. Anyone whose supposed sighting was before Scott left home wasn't necessarily followed up on. Waste of time.

[@Dark_Helmet734]

@@sophie8394 Your wrong but it iss ok

[@sophie8394]

@@Dark_Helmet734 no. *YOU'RE* wrong.

[@merlinshouseoffreereadings4641]

Scott getting a new trial should be scary for those who think he’s guilty. There are a lot of questions. Not a lot of solid evidence - circumstantial.

[@sophie8394]

Who said hes getting a new trial? And there was plenty of solid evidence. That's why he was convicted.

[@averageatbestva]

@@sophie8394 what solid evidence was that again? The cadaver dog that hit the scent failed certification, the cadaver dog that was certified never picked up the scent, there was zero physical evidence in the house, in his truck, in his boat and in his warehouse, there’s multiple people saying they saw Laci walking that same morning, the police couldn’t locate the bodies until AFTER they announced where Scott Peterson was at that morning, coincidentally enough another pregnant woman surfaced in the same condition as Laci did in that same place only difference being they couldn’t locate that poor woman’s baby, you have burglars that were picked up because of a robbery that occurred across the street from the Peterson home and their first reaction is “I had nothing to do with that pregnant lady,” you had a fisherman trying to say it’s possible to throw a 150 pound body with multiple weights attached over the side of a boat without capsizing it or damaging any of the boat yet in the reenactment the judge didn’t allow the boat was capsized every time, there’s evidence Conner was handled outside of the body give the condition he was found in with multiple threads wrapped around his body and electrical tape pinning his ear down, the hydrologist the prosecution called admitted he had no expertise on how water currents would effect a body despite trying to say tidal action could’ve caused Conner to exit Laci’s body, hell Amber couldn’t even get the guy to hint at him having anything to do with the murders in all of her recordings. The only evidence that was given was that Scott had an affair, the entire case was built of femotions, scandal, smearing and the fact that Scott had an affair.

[@sophie8394]

@@averageatbestva holy crap! You are so grossly misinformed it's staggering. Watch the documentary much? 🤣🤣🤣

[@averageatbestva]

@@sophie8394 great argument there Sophie, way to support it with solid evidence that you claim is there. Bravo. 👏🏻

[@sophie8394]

@@averageatbestva I'm not doing your homework for you. I've spent way too much time explaining the evidence in this case to rabid Peterson supporters only to have them completely dismiss it. Start by doing some research on Trimble the dog who you claim wasn't certified. Fully certified in 2002 AND 2003. Just another lie being told by Team Peterson. Sorry to hear you fell for their garbage.

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

Scott tells Amber he lost his wife a couple of weeks before she went missing, and this would be his first Christmas without her. And, by christmas, Laci really was gone! On the day he said that to Amber he bought a secret boat no one knew about. He also made five anchors, four of which were never recovered. The one that they did have, didn't match the cement in the driveway, which is where Scott said he'd used the rest of the missing cement, proven in court. Laci didn't know about, nor had she ever been in the boat, yet, a couple of Lacis hairs were found, wound tightly in some pliers. Agreed to take a lie detector test, but backed out after his father advised him not to. Upon returning home, he immediately washed his clothes, ate, and took shower. After getting out of shower, instead of just calling Lacis cell phone one more time, he calls her mom and tells her Laci is missing. He told, at least, three people he'd been playing golf, before finally sticking to the fishing story. Speaking of fishing, Scott told the detectives that going fishing that morning had been a last minute decision. But, this was an obvious lie because he'd purchased a two-day fishing license dated for the 23rd & 24th, a few days before. Or, maybe he's just psychic, and predicted he'd be making that "last minute" decision! When he took the detectives to his warehouse, he led them to believe the power was out, when the truth was, only his office in the warehouse had lighting, but the warehouse, itself, was only lit by a sky light during the day. When he went to the station to answer questions, he was already refering to Laci in past tense. Saying, "Laci was pregnant." Shouldn't that be IS pregnant? It wasn't past her due date. He did the same thing in his interview with Diane Sawyer. By then, he'd been made aware he shouldn't do that, as he immediately corrects himself saying, "is amazing" after he'd said 'was'. A huge red flag for the detectives on the case. On the night of Dec 24th, the day Laci went missing, Scott was already inquiring about grief counseling for Lacis family. Really??? She's not even yet gone a full 24hrs! I've never heard of anyone doing that over someone being missing for only a few hours! It just seems like Scott knew she wasn't coming home. The next day, Scott called the detectives asking them if they'd be bringing in and using cadaver dogs. She hadn't even been gone a full 24hours, and, he is inquiring about cadaver dogs! Another huge red flag to the detectives working the case! He sold Lacis car while still missing, before her body was found. And, inquired about selling their home before she was ever found too! He even wanted to sell it with all their furniture! Supposedly, he doesn't know if Laci is dead or alive, but has no problem selling her car and their home, with all their stuff in it? He told lie after lie after lie. Of course the big, well known lie was when he called Amber from Lacis vigil. Right before, during, or after just doesn't matter, at all! His mistress should've been the last thing on his mind at any moment during that event. It was well known he didn't want children, and wasn't thrilled about Laci being pregnate. Even telling his sister-in-law he was hoping for infertility. Laci telling her mom Scott wouldn't touch her belly to feel baby kicking. He didn't participate in the searches for Laci, opting instead, to secretly go to the bay, park his car, and just watch the search that was going on in the bay. Instead of showing grief about his wife being missing he, instead chose to flirt with his sisters baby sitter. Offering to make her drinks he called, "flirtinis". The baby sitter was so weirded out by Scott, she left! In one of the recorded calls with Amber, Scott tells her that if the police find any evidence, he'd lose his freedom. Not a confession, but close enough! When the due date, of the birth of his missing baby came around, he didn't have a gathering of friends & family to remember Laci & Conner. No, he didn't do anything at all to remember them. And, that would've been fine, if he chose to do nothing, no problem. But, he DID choose to do something. Since that day was also Ambers Bday, Scott chose to celebrate it, by hiding a bag of jewelry and a CD, etc for Amber to pick up. It seems it was Amber he wanted to remember & honor, not his missing wife & baby. When a body of a baby washed ashore, and then a body of a woman who had been pregnant washed ashore shortly after, within just a couple of miles from where he says he was 'fishing', he never even called anyone about it to see if it was Laci. About a week or so later, he was caught trying to flee with just about everything he owned, BUT his golf clubs and golf shoes. I add that he didn't have his clubs & shoes because Scott tried telling the cops that he was just going to play golf, not flee! However, the list of things he had with him is just as long, if not longer than my list here. What avid golfer goes to play golf with everything he owns BUT his clubs & shoes? I could go on & on! I know there's more, but I'm drawing a blank on the rest. Can anyone else think of anything I've forgotten? Okay so, one or two things on this list would be maybe a coincidence. three or four things --- sketchy, but okay. All these things plus more --- he's guilty, guilty, guilty! And, I don't even have it all listed here.

[@carobutterfli2537]

You definitely know the case. He is guilty. He is right where he belongs.

[@Plumbing.repairs]

I agree. Scott is just a master manipulator and very good at making his lies sound like they could possibly be believable if you don’t think much about it. But when you put all of the evidence in front of you and go through it, it screams guilty

[@LaciPeterson2002]

Excellent breakdown! Yes. There were over 1,000 pieces of evidence total. Not all admitted of course. The circumstantial evidence was off the charts. Who Lies to cops about how he cut his hand and then douses the evidence in gasoline? No innocent person does that.

[@joanmarie7631]

Rennnaay No ones gonna read your comment All I have to say is “Scott Didn’t CAPSIZE”!!!! Dumb as rocks

[@glynisparry3894]

Maybe you could write your own book and make all the above fit so It sounds as If he Is guilty. Most of what you have written Is not actually quite the case. Just one example - there were not two hairs found In the pliers in his boat but one hair - there was no root so DNA could not be extracted - the forensics and I quote said that It could belong to at least 300 women In Modesto. Yes I can think of one thing you have forgotten - all of any evidence was circumstantial and that Is not good enough to take away a man's liberation .He was a fantasist and a prolific liar and having an affair but that was his only guilt and that Is what got him where he Is now. Thank you for taking the time to respond to me.

[@rebeccakeane8833]

This guy could very well be innocent. There is no evidence against him!!

[@sophie8394]

There is a ton of evidence.

[@rebeccakeane8833]

List the evidence for me. No one should be on death row unless they know without a shadow of a doubt that a person is guilty

[@sophie8394]

@@rebeccakeane8833 you want me to list 4 months worth of evidence?? There was no doubt for the jury who spent nearly 6 months of their lives seeing and hearing all of the evidence. Ps...he's not on death row anymore. Try to keep up.

[@rharmony25]

He was originally going to be put to death and that is likely her meaning. Try to keep up.

[@sophie8394]

@@rharmony25 anyone who knows anything about this case knows his death sentenced was overturned almost 2 yrs ago. They should know the evidence. Try to mind your business.

[@davidhutchinson5233]

I don't think there is any question that reasonable doubt exists. No question about it. Between police misconduct, the doctor who incorrectly dated Connor and Laci's remains and the burglars who were never properly investigated...those facts alone should really be enough for a new trial. And this isn't even talking about the biased media frenzy and the juror who lied. I mean, Laci went and confronted those burglars and one witness even said they saw the burglars with Laci in hand.

[@sophie8394]

🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@laneybobs8157]

😆 🤣 😂

[@SundayMourningLove]

At this point, everyone despises Scott Peterson and wants it to be him so badly that they won't even be logical when it comes to the reasonable doubt! I absolutely believed it was Scott in the beginning as well, just like the media wanted everyone to believe! It wasn't until years later that I started looking into other possibilities. There's no doubt Scott was a piece of crap husband and Laci deserved better, but there is plenty of doubt as to whether or not he's the one who killed her. Enough doubt that he shouldn't be in prison.

[@Eadrene]

there is no evidence that she went and confronted them or that someone saw them with her.

[@jwait1496]

@@Eadrene Yes there is. The MPD hid information from the public and the defense. Remember, a treasure trove of incriminating evidence against S Todd and G Pearce existed. information about any investigation of this tip. Lt. Aponte gave a signed statement to defense investigators which said the prisoner had been interviewed by MPD, and that MPD had received a copy of the taped phone conversation. Instead of this information being disclosed during discovery. The only information provided to the defense about his tip was a simple notation on a CD which included 10,000 other tips about the case. -Merlin, the trailing dog owned by Cindee Valentin, trailed Laci's scent to the Gallo Winery in the airport district, on the night of December 26. Not far from the burglars residence. -December 31, a gold Croton watch, identical to Laci’s watch which disappeared the same day she did, was pawned by Deanna Renfro. Highly unlikely this is just a coincidence. It gets better. The families of Deanna Renfro, Steven Todd and the Tenbrinks know one another. -Diane Jackson reported seeing 3 men with a VAN and a SAFE in front of the Medina’s house at 11:40 a.m. on December 24. There is no debating this. The burglary happened the same day Laci disappeared. Both Todd and Pearce pled guilty to burglary charges 12-24-02. They both received reduced sentences. - S Todd would have received 25 years for his third offense. So why did he get 8 years and 8 months, far less than 25 years. Pearce received only 180 days, yet he was another career criminal. -Tom Harshman, who lived in Modesto, was driving with Elizabeth Harshman between 2 and 4 p.m. on the afternoon of December 24. He saw a young pregnant woman being forced into a van. He turned around and went back to the spot hoping to find the van still there and hoping to get more information about the license plate number. But they were gone. 1. He called police (911 MPD) that same day. 2. Tried again December 28. 3. December 28, he also called the Laci tip line twice. His first call on this date was listed incorrectly under the name Harsh and was given Bates Stamp number 14789. The call was given to Detective Holmes. Harsh(man) said that he had called 3 or 4 days earlier on the day that he had seen a pregnant young woman being pushed into a van. There had been a man standing over her as she squatted to urinate with her back up against a chain-link fence. The man was described as 30’s, tall, thin, with ponytail, dirty blonde to gray hair, scrubby looking. When she finished, the woman was shepherded back to the driver’s door of the car, where another man’s arm was seen pulling her into the car. He said the young woman was wearing black pants and a red shirt. He said she had a scared look on her face." 4. Jan 3rd, he went to the Command Post in the park and relayed this to the officer on duty. Over 40,000 pages in the discovery and nothing about this report was in it. 5. February 2003, Harshman’s wife spoke to a relative of hers who lived in New York about the sighting of Laci Peterson near the corner of Scenic and Claus. Mrs. Harshman’s relative shared this story with an NYPD detective. This NYPD detective was so concerned that he contacted the MPD and spoke personally to Detective Grogan on February 14, 2003. What did Grogan do with the information? Nothing at all. 6. pre-trial hearings in May of 2004, DA Investigator Kevin Bertalotto noticed the Harshman tip and insisted that Grogan call Tom Harshman and speak to him personally. Grogan did this on May 18, 2004. An audiotape and a transcription of his conversation with Harshman to the defense on May 20, 11 days before the beginning of the trial.

[@JeffVader39]

People just don’t understand that the prosecution has to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. They clearly didn’t so he can’t be convicted

[@sophie8394]

You just live in your own little world don't you?

[@JeffVader39]

@@sophie8394 can you stop stalking me please 😂

[@sophie8394]

@@JeffVader39 can you stop making stupid comments?

[@SJ-vo1bw]

Beyond a reasonable doubt....not kind of a reasonable doubt. With no crime scene, no witnesses, no cause of death, no murder weapon, no confession....what did they have? A cheater? Amber was a fling and that's it. Married men tell women they're widowers all the time. I don't believe Scott would have left his wife for Amber or any other fling he was having.

[@sophie8394]

@@SJ-vo1bw do all of these men who tell women they are widowers ALL THE TIME, actually end up being widowers?

[@LMB943]

Scot's eyes always have been and still are cold and empty.

[@davidhutchinson5233]

That has nothing to do with anything. Everyone knows, the killers look like the victims and the victims look like the killers. FACTS are what should determine a case...not innuendo or how someone looks for pete's sake. That's crazy

[@LMB943]

@@davidhutchinson5233 That is your opinion and you have every right to it. But so do I to mine. I along with 90% of people around the world believe that he is guilty. He "fished" ontop of his wife and son's bodies. He also told Amber before he lost his wife that he lost her and it's his first christmas without her. He has shark eyes for a reason weather you like it or not.

[@jenniferscott3176]

@@LMB943 no moron he has brown eyes that are human which has nothing to do with crimes at all, there is so much evidence that speaks volumes of his innocence I was there he was tagged by police and media it was insane she didn't die until January 3rd she had a broken femur that had healing she was held 10 days before she died after durning giving birth the amount of evidence proves his innocence beyond 99.99% the only way he could have done anything was to hire someone but he was watched and recorded the entire nightmare he never talked to anyone amber lied from day one of the police meeting her which was long after and she made it her mission to get him because police told her he did it and she was jilted when she realized he had lied to her the entire time she thought she was going to bag herself a buck of a husband and he was fully into his wife had no plans to be with her once baby boy born he acted weird in start because he believed his wife just figure out he cheated and she took off her parents are the one after he called them to ask if she had been there they said no called police so police went after him for not calling them he believed she was punishing him by icing him out with silent treatment because he cheated on her had no idea she was kidnapped because police who had that didn't go after that line of investigation because they believed she was killed by him on Dec 23rd 24th she died Jan 3rd 10 days while he was under police surveillance and media stalking while being recordered the entire time how and when was he supposed to dump her body when they believed he dumped her body the 24th but yet the entire neighborhood saw her walk her dog after he left 13 strangers and 3 neighbors who knew her along with 3 story's thay she was near 2 men and a white van 1 story with a dog 2 story without and the one she was pushed into the van with what she was wearing and what they were wearing and the men later when questioned said it was a accident of her being taken and died but police said they were seeking fame yet they were the ones who broke into the neighborhood houses finger prints and confession recorded and played on news then not allowed in court so many things in court where not allowed and wrong like the time of death time line as well as the body search area was searched and he and the mother of laci was on beach where she was later found on news cameras searching with entire area of volunteers 10 days later a fresh body placed on beach where the police who had alibi information gave to media outlets during a ongoing investigation its injustice at highest crime possible he had no access to a fair trial ever based on what the police did and the lies that were used as facts and later after trial changed but not given a new trial and its been 20 years of known misjustice its insane the lines of what he was found guilty of have been proven changed from what was given at time of trial yet he is still there and media is still out to bash him his only crime being a man who cheated on his wife which isn't against the law he is a victim of misjustice and police insolvency and public scrutiny of being a male whore just because u don't like someone for their brown eyes instead a crime yet he's been in prison for 20 years based solely alone on statements like urs I find u should be tried based on ur bias for 20 years without parole

[@davidtassy9901]

This is why trial by jury scare me. We as humans display a wide range of emotions. Some ppl laugh when they are sad, some ppl come off as cold but feel everything. What we know is that there is too much reasonable doubt in this case.

[@kurtenglund5753]

@@davidhutchinson5233 She can't make a comment on how Scott looks? That's crazy.

[@franciscomontes5153]

You people need to research the people that's were falsely accused and served long prison sentences. They were made to look so guilty and even with false made up evidence. In this case there was NO physical evidence. What convicted him was that he was having an affair. Now IDK if he is guilty or not but that should worry all of us.

[@sophie8394]

There was plenty of physical evidence. Forensic evidence, documentary evidence and a mountain of circumstantial evidence. Maybe you're the one who needs to do some research.

[@jwait1496]

@@sophie8394 There was no physical evidence against him. Also, conjecture and lies doesn't qualify as circumstantial evidence. -Circumstantial evidence If reasonable, innocent explanations and alternate theories that counter guilty inferences are possible, the jury is required to find reasonable doubt.

[@sophie8394]

@@jwait1496 why don't you tell me again about how the 'real killer's kept Laci's body in a giant fish tank 🤣

[@jwait1496]

@@sophie8394 Why don't you tell when and where I ever said that "Laci was kept in a fish tank"? Why would I ever say that. Try harder, loser!

[@sophie8394]

@@jwait1496 I don't. That's your thing Kathryn 👍

[@dennisn1672]

Finding her where he was fishing. She had no enemies. He's got to be the dumbest killer on the planet. The eye's don't lie.

[@jenniferallen4420]

Or ya know since it was publicized so much anyone wanting to frame easily could.. how bout the witnesses seeing laci speak about the robbers across the street?

[@raybass1938]

The media only blasted that the police were searching where he went fishing 24/7. It would be pretty easy for the real killer to frame him and dump the body after the police stopped searching there.

[@kmremseysmith4771]

@@jenniferallen4420 No it was not publicized early on. No one said they saw Laci speaking to anyone on the street. There was no darn robbery across the street. Get with it. You missed the case and liking your own trash with another troll acct won't make it so.

[@kmremseysmith4771]

@@raybass1938 BS. The media did not know where Scott fake fishing trip was until the MPD announced on Jan. 6th while the robbers who were cleared were in prison. You obviously missed this case and the autopsy report trumps your bull shat.

[@jenniferallen4420]

@@kmremseysmith4771 you obviously dont know what youre talking about if you think that there was no robbery across the street. Look up the facts of the case. There certainly was a robbery. And multiple witnesses seen laci walking the dog. Look it up. Dont trust me. Look it up for yourself..

[@rebeccakeane8833]

Just because he cheated doesn’t mean he is a murderer

[@sophie8394]

He wasn't convicted for being a cheater.

[@rebeccakeane8833]

@@sophie8394 yeah but they convicted him because he cheated. Watch the series and I guarantee you will change your mind

[@sophie8394]

@@rebeccakeane8833 🤣🤣🤣 If you're referring to the Peterson family documentary full of lies, I've seen it. Fortunately for me I've spent years researching the case and wasn't as easily fooled as you obviously were.

[@rebeccakeane8833]

@@sophie8394 I’m not fooled but there is no evidence. No one but God and Scott can say for sure

[@sophie8394]

@@rebeccakeane8833 no evidence 🤣🤣🤣 No matter how many times I hear that it still makes me laugh out loud 🤣 Do you know what a preliminary hearing is? If there wasn't any evidence there never would have been a trial. Try reading the decision of the judge who presided over the preliminary hearing. Do you know something they don't?

[@sonnybowen3574]

The state couldn't even tell them when the murder happened,,,,,,,,, FULL REVERSAL,,,,,,,,

[@wildbillslunksauce7621]

Seek help, you’re in a cult. The only reason they couldn’t provide that was because by the time they found her, she was a floating limbless corpse with no head.

[@LaciPeterson2002]

You talking about Chris Watts again? Ted Bundy? Scott? Yeah. They couldn’t tell you where or when either. Doesn’t mean someone gets away with murder. They had a mountain of evidence.

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

When you have a ton of overwhelming circumstantial evidence, like this case, they don't have to say where or even when it happened. They've even gotten convictions without the body.

[@Ron4T1]

@@reneenayfabnaynay5679. The prosecution has the burden to prove every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt and they had the burden to provide a reliable theory and the prosecution did not do that in this case.

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

@@Ron4T1 the higher courts of California have already affirmed the fairness of Scott Petersons trial. He's already been resentenced to life without parole. So, what are you going on about?

[@nysguy07]

No question he was convicted primarily due to his cheating on his wife. He may have committed the crime but for Dan to claim there’s all this evidence of his guilt is simply wrong. There was no forensic evidence pointing to him and the police kept changing their story of when scott allegedly murdered laci. As for the jury, their behavior after the verdict was appalling. They certainly acted like a group of people who were out to get the accused and did not go into deliberations with an assumption of innocence.

[@sophie8394]

There was a mountain of evidence including forensic evidence such as the canine scent detection evidence and the expert testimony of the movement of bodies in the SFB.

[@nysguy07]

@@sophie8394 The canine evidence was laughable. I’m not saying he’s innocent but it was shown that the dog evidence is easily disputable.

[@aok4418]

@sophie8394 What evidence? Canine scent detection is not reliable scientific evidence. It's fallible evidence. Scent dogs are a tool. DOG EVIDENCE First of all. Eloise Anderson and Trimble were not the only team the police called to search at the Berkeley Marina. Ron Seitz, whose dog was also certified by CARDA, was called to search the marina. (9 RT 1774.) X. Seitz used one of Laci’s slippers to scent his dog. (9 RT The CourIn sharp contrast to the sunglasses used by Anderson to scent Trimble, there was no evidence at all suggesting that Scott had handled the slipper. I think cannot allow any of the dog tracking evidence in, period. He didn't want Trimble's because there was never a CARDA certification provided. Anderson admitted that she wanted to make sure that the scent article was uncontaminated by any scent other than Laci’s. (8 RT 1562.) Nevertheless, she did not do the missing member test at the Marina with Scott’s scent. (85 RT 16133.) Defense did indeed ask Anderson about the failed test. GERAGOS: Okay. Well, at the time that Mr. Kopp asked you about this in February, he, you specifically said the trailing exercise you did not include in those reports was the time when your dog was asked to trail a vehicle trail and failed; isn't that right? Do you remember him asking you that? ANDERSON: Yes, and I believe I said I don't believe so. GERAGOS: You said "I don't recall --" ANDERSON: Or I don't think so, or I don't recall. GERAGOS: I'll, you want me to read it? ANDERSON: Please. GERAGOS: "I don't recall an exercise where she was asked to trail, other than the one that's in her records." Is that what you testified to? ANDERSON: If that's what it says, that's what I testified to. GERAGOS: Referring to page 1544. ANDERSON: Okay. GERAGOS: Okay. Now, specifically there was no mention of this videotape in any of your records; is that correct? ANDERSON: That's correct. GERAGOS: Okay. The way that this videotape, and you had this videotape, didn't you? ANDERSON: I found out when I went home, after I testified, that I had it. I didn't think I had it at the time. GERAGOS: Okay. And the reason you had it was that Mr. Rebmann had mailed the videotape to you, correct? ANDERSON: That's correct. And I didn't think that my dog was on it, so I never looked at it. >>>>> GERAGOS: Now, when did you call the district attorney about this? ANDERSON: I don't recall. It was after February. GERAGOS: Okay. It was after February. Wasn't it when I executed a subpoena on Contra Costa on August 3rd? Didn't you call the DA, of this month, on August 4th, and tell them Wait a second, I got a tape? ANDERSON: No. GERAGOS: You didn't call them on August 4th? ANDERSON: No, I didn't. Well, I don't, I don't know who might have called them on August 4th, but I had the tape before this month. GERAGOS: You never before - ANDERSON: In fact, I turned this tape over to the sheriff's department in March or April. I believe it was March. GERAGOS: Okay. Now, did you know that I had executed a subpoena on Contra Costa on August 3rd for all of the records? August 3rd of this month? ANDERSON: That's correct. >>> GERAGOS: Okay. That's where she circled back to you because she lost the scent as soon as the person got in the vehicle, correct? ANDERSON: Incorrect. GERAGOS: Okay. Well, she didn't follow the direction the vehicle went in, did she? ANDERSON: According to what I was told after the fact of where the vehicle went, she did follow the direction of the vehicle. GERAGOS: Oh, and who told you that? Was it Mr. Rebmann? ANDERSON: No. I believe it was the people that drove, the subject and her husband. GERAGOS: Mr. Rebmann told you specifically that the dog had not followed the vehicle trail and the dog had failed, and, as he had expected, that the vehicle, that your dog could not do vehicle trailing; isn't that what he told you? ANDERSON: No, that is not what he told me. ----Opinions of two nationally- recognized experts in dog-scent identification on the validity of Eloise Anderson’s conclusion that Trimble detected Laci’s scent at the Marina. Both experts, Dr. Lawrence Myers and Andrew Rebmann, have concluded that Trimble’s purported detection of Laci’s scent was totally and completely unreliable. First, Rebmann does not believe it has ever been demonstrated that any dog, including Trimble, could follow a non-contact vehicle trail. (Ibid.) Rebmann personally knew Eloise Anderson, as she had attended one of Rebmann’s training seminars with Trimble in 2002. (Ibid.) At that seminar, Anderson claimed that she and Trimble could follow a vehicle trail. Yet, when Rebmann constructed a double-blind, vehicle trail test for Ms. Anderson and Trimble, she and her dog failed the test. (Id. at HCP-000039, HCP-000040.) Furthermore, according to Rebmann, the dog had not demonstrated a sufficient proficiency in this skill in prior trainings. (Id. at HCP-000040.) B. Second, Mr. Rebmann states that Ms. Anderson’s search omitted the “missing-member” procedure, by failing to let Trimble sniff Scott Peterson beforehand. (Exh. 5 at HCP-000039.) Consequently, Ms. Andersoncould not insure that on December 28, 2002 Trimble was not following Mr.Peterson’s scent, rather than Laci’s scent, as he drove the boat out of themarina. (Id. at HCP-000040-41.) C. Third,Mr.Rebmann noted that there was a four-day delay between December 24, when Laci’s body was supposedly at the marina, and the search on December 28, which sharply reduces the reliability of scent detection. (Id. at HCP-000041.)

[@sophie8394]

@@nysguy07 👌🥴

[@aok4418]

@@sophie8394 What expert? Are you referring to Dr Cheng? He wasn't an expert, genius. He also said there was no explanation for Laci's body being found where it was.

[@sumyunguy3876]

They keep saying facts but he wasn’t convicted on facts he was convicted on public opinion and that’s a fact. A&E did an eye opening Doc. Bet most of you didn’t know the timelines didn’t add up so they had to change it. bet you also didn’t know there was a burglary reported across the street from laci’s house on the day she went missing. Plenty more of those kind of shannagins by the detectives. And I’m not even saying dude innocent I’m just saying he was convicted on public opinion not facts.

[@sophie8394]

Bet you don't know that that documentary was created by the Peterson family and produced by one of Janey's best friends who is also a founding member of the Scott Peterson is Innocent fb group. And you think you were being told the truth? It's full of lies, half truths and deliberately omits the evidence against SP. Sorry to hear you fell for it.

[@sumyunguy3876]

@@sophie8394 man if I only read the credits I wouldn’t been fooled thanks your so smart 👍🏾need more ppl like you out there to tell us the real truth cause our eyes and ears are deceitful.

[@sophie8394]

@@sumyunguy3876 anyone who knows the facts of this case knew that mockumentary was a farce from the 1st episode. How gullible are you that you think the Peterson family and a hard core SP fan are going to tell the real story? You obviously don't mind being lied to. And it's *you're

[@sumyunguy3876]

@@sophie8394 funny how you ignored my post and said what you feel sounds just like the case all I said was they didn’t present facts just opinion. But hey we live in a world where ppl feelings out way reality and I don’t like being lied to hence the original post and if the facts you are referring to is that he cheated on his pregnant wife then damn they should put the death penalty back on him cause he really hurt women of America’s feelings when they found he was cheating

[@sophie8394]

@@sumyunguy3876 funny. Your original post talked about the eye opening doc on A&E. He wasn't convicted for being a cheater. If you had read the trial transcripts like I have you'd know that 🧐 Out WAY??? Not surprising that you don't understand this case.

[@serenaleaghgrace5023]

keep him where he is, where he belongs

[@tonyallewellyn7304]

Exactly

[@jenniferscott3176]

so I guess u belong in prison to I mean we are going based on how people feel about us I think u murdered her based on statements u made here have fun sitting jail for 29 years

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

@@jenniferscott3176 yeah, that argument will win any case. (eye roll)

[@stonesthrow420]

He's a sociopath. No remorse, no regret, no pity at all for Laci. Anybody who tells his girlfriend (he is cheating with) that his missing wife is dead, and later on they find her dead body....is GUITY AS HELL!!

[@tonyallewellyn7304]

Yep 👏🏻

[@nigeljones482]

How do you know Scott is a sociopath, do yo have his mental health assessment records? What is your factual baseline for No- Remorse, & Regret, what scientific data do you have that can predict and make a determination on how a person feels or reacts, people can have delayed reactions, a person can be so stunned or traumatized they may show no emotion, that is not grounds of guilt, you are using your own personal feels to judge Scott.

[@jwait1496]

Guess you didn't research much. There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. Even the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explained to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found. -Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. -Conner was found above the high tide line and water break. -The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear. -Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested. -The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years." -Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments. -Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.

[@V5Bs]

And the same age as Scott and Laci Peterson. I watched everything, and I mean everything there was to watch. From the beginning of the trial to the end. I read everything there has been to read from both perspectives. I think he's a complete prick, but I honestly don't believe they had enough evidence to prove he was guilty. And from what I saw I don't believe that he is.

[@sophie8394]

More than enough evidence to convict him. Obviously. He's been in prison for nearly 2 decades. They had waaaay less evidence on Ted Bundy.

[@CocoAvalon]

Yes, a cheating jerk, but not enough evidence to convict him of murder.

[@sophie8394]

@@CocoAvalon there obviously was.

[@CocoAvalon]

@@sophie8394 That's your opinion. This is mine.

[@sophie8394]

@@CocoAvalon it's the opinion of the jurors who spent nearly 6 months of their lives seeing and hearing all of the evidence. Your opinion doesn't count.

[@mikemacdude]

Nope. Guilty as charged

[@momsos9632]

I followed this case at very early stage and I didn’t see any solid evidence from police that points at Mr Peterson been the killer, the fact that he was a cheater, doesn’t mean he killed his wife and child I am very sorry for both families and for Mr. Peterson my prayers have been with all of them since day one, The most sad and disturbing side that I see is that an innocent person might had been sentenced to prison and the actual criminals might be out of the streets committed more crimes to me it points out very clear that the actual killers were the two guys that broke into the house across the street from the Petersons

[@sophie8394]

There's a ton of evidence that SP committed this crime. What evidence is there that points to the burglars? Zero ⭕ Or anyone else for that matter. Not to mention the fact that the burglary happened 2 days after she disappeared.

[@kenannon5604]

@@sophie8394 I've seen testimony from a reporter who said he was there on the morning of the 26th, and that nobody else was around. So I'm not convinced about the burglary being on a later date.

[@sophie8394]

@@kenannon5604 there was no testimony. Ted Rowlands claimed/lied that he was directly in front of the Peterson and Medina homes when in fact he was hundreds of feet down the street at the entrance to the park as proven by his own video. The burglary happened in the early morning hours and when they returned in a borrowed car to retrieve the safe they had left behind they saw the news truck and described it to police and exactly where it was parked. The burglary happened on the 26th.

[@robertwoodworth7819]

It wouldn’t surprise me if did it. That being said proof beyond a reasonable doubt does matter.

[@sophie8394]

@@robertwoodworth7819 it was proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

[@grumpiesngiggles4581]

The juror wasn't assaulted by her bf while pregnant. She was threatened by her bf ex girlfriend. Man you'd think you'd get it right after 17yrs. I want to know about the men that robbed the house across the street. When will that be looked into?

[@sophie8394]

The burglary was looked into 18 yrs ago. Solved.

[@melisentiapheiffer3034]

@@sophie8394 that is what the media told you to believe.

[@sophie8394]

@@melisentiapheiffer3034 😂😂😂😂 No. That is fact. You wouldn't know anything about that.

[@petelikedporn6009]

@@sophie8394 too bad they don't read the testimony and appeals. It's like talking to people with the knowledge of a 1st grader about this case.

[@sophie8394]

@@petelikedporn6009 truth 🙌

[@carried5899]

This was awful what happen to Laci. But remember it was HER step dad that FIRST tried to and did put the doubt toward Scott in everyone's eyes. Oh I know he's gone now but no one actually even looked at him..her stepdad.. There was always something about how he was in love with the cameras at every chance he could get to run his mouth and talk. I think on any other case he would have been looked at.....but Scott had a girlfriend....oh how step dad ran away with that. Remember he was the only one who said Scott claimed to have been golfing to start with...but that's not what Scott told st all. Oh well I know this is not a popular opinion at all but I thought this from the start of the whole thing. Ever wonder why his last words were I'm just tired?? What tired of worrying if it would come to light that something else happen?? Just my opinion again.

[@sophie8394]

What a ridiculous comment. Of course he was looked at. All of Laci's family was. They also all took and passed polygraphs. Scott was the only one who refused. Twice.

[@carried5899]

@@sophie8394 They ALL took polygraph test??? Where is that information??? That's news to me??? Never heard that before. Information location???

[@sophie8394]

@@carried5899 they all took a polygraph. Told to me by the lieutenant from the DA's office who supervised the investigation.

[@carried5899]

@@sophie8394 That is the first time this info ever came to light. I want to hear it on video or camera that this took place. Maybe a news report will do a piece on how everyone took these test. Because you see in all the other cases I've ever known to be in the news I have never heard of multi test being done. I don't believe you. Plain and simple. I'm done talking to you Sophie... You making things up now.

[@sophie8394]

@@carried5899 aw now I'm probably going to lose so much sleep bc a stranger on the internet doesn't believe me 😭😭

[@christiansamaroo]

Even if he is innocent he can never get his conviction overturned because he became a public enemy.

[@jenniferscott3176]

yes flamed by the media they should be held responsible for their actions for so many lives 👏🙌

[@sophie8394]

@@jenniferscott3176 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@petelikedporn6009]

He's guilty

[@christiansamaroo]

@@petelikedporn6009 I know. All signs points to him.

[@jwait1496]

@@christiansamaroo What points to him? The MPD should have done their jobs. They refused follow the actual evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction. The media spun everything and that's the way police wanted it. He was seen at the marina by three people. Does it sound logical that a guy is going to kill his wife and take the chance of dumping her body in broad daylight. He needs to back the boat down the ramp and leave it there for anyone to see in broad daylight including anyone from the hundreds of people that live on their boats all year round. There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. Even the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explained to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found. -Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. -Conner was found above the high tide line and water break. -The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear. -Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested. -The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years." -Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments. -Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.

[@Solitude47152]

As a Criminal Defense attorney Murder convictions are overturned all the time. What’s this guy talking about?

[@sophie8394]

Criminal defense attorney??? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@sophie8394]

You didn't even know why the death sentence was overturned 🤣

[@LastCommodore]

The prosecution never really proved that he committed the murder. But for his conviction to be overturned, there would have to be new evidence or another suspect brought to light.

[@sophie8394]

They obviously did prove it. He's been in prison for nearly 2 decades.

[@aok4418]

@@sophie8394 Innocent people have died in prison or have been put to death. Can you come up with anything better than that, Laney Bobs, Patty Sullivan.

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

@@sophie8394 we always come up with stuff that debunks his BS. Yet, here he still is! Proving it's not the truth he's interested in!

[@aok4418]

@@reneenayfabnaynay5679 Can you name something without lying? I'll listen since you always take the time to chime in.

[@aok4418]

If you were interested in the truth you wouldn't continue spreading lies. Especially after they have been debunked nearly 20 years ago. It has to be difficult when you both are so obsessed about a case, yet your facts are skewed and twisted beyond belief.

[@traceytrotter9934]

We didn't see all the evidence. Laci was seen walking the dog by numerous people when she was supposed to already be dead. Seriously, he looks to be innocent. The way he was portrayed by the media is why we all thought he was guilty. Needs to be retried.

[@diamondgirl6716]

Well, yeah, they were telling us that he was guilty before he even was convicted like they betted the farm on that outcome. How obnoxiously arrogant of them.

[@johnson9195]

They tracked those witnesses down and determined that the person they saw walking the dog wasn't her after all.

[@m.a2905]

They said she was walking her dog that morning, they were trying to show someone else could have kidnapped her. Had nothing to do with the timeline.

[@m.a2905]

@@diamondgirl6716 You are some stupid chicks, the type that a man would get over on you easy. Go and watch the whole documentary.what the hell would he be running back and fourth to the area where he went fishing for, then by coincidence her body surfaces. Her head and limbs were missing. That’s from being weighed down. He coincidentally made weights that week. Why not tell in the beginning you’re having an affair. The mistress said he said she died,she believes he’s guilty. My goodness and there’s much more. Damn he showed no emotion for her nor his child, even actors cry.

[@opog85]

@@m.a2905 there was zero substantial physical evidence...they said she was killed at home but found no evidence of that...they actually don't know where, when or how she was killed...i personally wouldn't have voted for a guilty verdict...

[@nitagirl614]

HE IS GUILTY...and I wish people can see past him and his lawyer's and family's bullshit!

[@tonyallewellyn7304]

Yep, he sure is

[@laneybobs8157]

AbsoFUCKINGlutely!!

[@jwait1496]

Go ahead, prove it. When and where did Scott transfer Laci's body from the truck to the boat in broad daylight? And why didn't a single witness see or hear him killing Laci or transporting her body anywhere? -Why did any and all forensic testing come back negative for biological evidence of a dead body in any alleged crime scene? They even tested the water in the boat, Negative results. -Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. So how is he guilty if Laci was alive after the 24th? -How did Conners body end above the water break and high tide line if he was in the ocean? -How did his left ear get permanently flattened against his head and a rectangular piece of material was over it? -Why was their no animal feeding on Conner whatsoever? - How did plastic wrap get knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested? Dr. Cyril Wecht, who examined Conner's body but who did not testify, told Greta van Susteren that Conner's head measured 28 cm circumference and his neck measured 20 cm (On the Record, October 27, 2004). 28 cm = 11.02360 inches; 20 cm = 7.87400 inches. He confirmed the measurements in another interview with Fox News, and expressed his disbelief that the twine accidentally wrapped around Conner's neck. He also conjectured about the baby being in a bag. -Why was Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been? Certainly explains why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made. -Why did police ignore evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction? Isn't it standard police practice to track down a missing person's last known whereabouts? It's not like they didn't have credible eyewitnesses that seen her walking on the 24th. Some called multiple times. Police ignored them. Sounds like tunnel vision and incompetence led to her death since the science proves she was alive after that day. - Why was there no cadaver scent if Laci had been dead in the boat, warehouse, truck or home?

[@jwait1496]

The only bullshit is the media and police lies you have absorbed for 20 years. AMERICAS MOST WANTED TIP, IGNORED BY THE MPD. Four days after Steven Todd and Glenn Pearce were arrested, America’s Most Wanted ran a story on Laci’s disappearance. An anonymous call came into their hotline. We refer to it as the AMW tip. The caller said he had a conversation with two men who were bragging about Laci’s murder. The second man was unnamed, but the tipster gave a description and knew where the second individual lived. It was reported that the first man said “when they did it they thought it was going to be just another murder case . . . now it’s a big case all over TV and news . . . and they are blaming the husband and they are not getting any attention.” went on to say how stupid everyone was. The caller went on to say that he knew where the first man lived with his mother; his mother has the same last name. The last name is worth mentioning because four days earlier, the Modesto Police had encountered the Mother. She was present at her neighbor’s home when police came looking for the Medina’s stolen property. There was a strong connection between the Doe family and burglar Steven Todd. Certainly, this would merit follow-up, especially since the AMW operator stated this caller was 100% sure. Unfortunately, the extent of their follow up was this: This tip was given to a Modesto police officer, the same officer that encountered the mother four days earlier. This officer drove to the sons house, which was one block away from where he had encountered the mother, four days earlier. The son was standing outside. The officer confirmed his identity and asked where he was on December 24th. He said he was “locked up.” The officer called the jail and a deputy confirmed that John Doe had been in jail on the 24th, so the officer did not ask any other questions. The tip did not say he had murdered Laci, the tip just said “they did it.” It is not clear at all who “they” are. However, the officer asked no more questions. The officer never asked why it would be reported that he was bragging about the murder of Laci Peterson; whether he knew anything about Laci’s whereabouts; or about his mother’s connection to the Medina burglary. It was recently verified the first man WAS NOT IN JAIL during December of 2002. The deputy that had confirmed he was in jail had used an intake document that only estimates an inmate’s jail stay, it was not updated once he was released. The MPD screwed up big time.

[@micjakes1]

The burglars killed them. Scott cheated on Laci but he never hurt them.

[@kmremseysmith4771]

Nope, they did not.

[@glynisparry3894]

Agree - Scott could not harm anyone let alone Laci and baby . Maybe the burglars or men following her In the park for her jewelry - I hope he Is realeased

[@kmremseysmith4771]

@@glynisparry3894 Wrong again as he did this. He admitted it troll.

[@LaciPeterson2002]

Think it’s the burglars? OMG! You’re in Luck! There is a $250,000 REWARD offered by Scott’s family for information leading to ‘The Real Killers’! You know who did it? Did you call the Modesto Police? Did you try and call Scott’s family? Why are you telling everyone the big news on KZbin when you can be $250k richer!? One of the burglars is still alive and well in Modesto. Just living his best life, working and remaining drug-free. Not hard to find. What are you waiting for?

[@kmremseysmith4771]

@@glynisparry3894 Wrong again.

[@futureghost162]

why would you even ask that question ? he killed his pregnant wife and disposed of her body where he went ‘fishing’ at. her body was later found there. he is guilty. case closed. just bc other crimes happened in the area during her murder means nothing.

[@dawndubsky4641]

Her body would not have stayed where he went fishing.

[@futureghost162]

@@dawndubsky4641 found in the same area. not the exact spot. yes im aware of tides and currents. what point are you even making? same body of water. he weighted her down with concrete blocks he made. do you defend all men no matter what. you know what thats called. a pickmesha. i bet you ‘forgive’ ur husband or ex bfs off all kinds of stuff

[@opog85]

They found no evidence in the truck or in the boat so how did he drive all the way to that spot without leaving substantial trace evidence?...was she in the truck or the boat during that drive?...if she was in the truck how come he was not seen putting her body in the boat?..if she was in the boat how could she not be seen by other drivers on the road or the dock attendant who had a up and close visual of the truck and boat?...those questions make me believe that he did not have her...he gave his whereabouts and the kidnappers could have easily dumped her their counting on him being blamed...after all, no evidence that she was killed at home was found...she could have been alive still when he gave his alibi and it was aired on the news a few hours later giving the suspects a golden ticket to a frame up...

[@sophie8394]

She was wrapped in a tarp. He backed his truck into his warehouse which was all but deserted on Christmas Eve. She wasn't seen in the boat bc it had a cover on it and no one was found that said they saw him or saw in his boat at the marina. His location of Brooks Island wasn't released to the public until Jan 4 2003. How do you believe that he couldn't possibly pull this off without being seen, but believe that kidnappers could dispose of her body after the fact when the marina and the bay was crawling with LE searching for Laci? Your theory holds no water.

[@glynisparry3894]

Agree. Innocent. Case Closed.

[@LaciPeterson2002]

They found the boat cover he used that day DOUSED IN GASOLINE. Lol. Come on. Lying to police how he cut his hands? Lying to volunteers he was in grief counseling? Lying about his own name!? His mom telling him to deny, deny, deny? Several trips to the bay to spy on searchers? Selling lacis car. Talking to TWO realtors to dump the house. This was a common sense case. Slam dunk. Like Mark Geragos said, people have been convicted on less.

[@glynisparry3894]

Well put Nation - I agree 100%

[@Tuber828]

There is no way he's innocent

[@tenchitag]

The same day she went missing the neighbors across the street were getting their home broken into. People driving by saw a pregnant woman standing next to the robbers and their van.

[@laneybobs8157]

@@tenchitaglet's pretend the burglary happened on the 24th...What motive did the burglars have to kidnap and then kill a heavily pregnant lady? Do tell.

[@sophie8394]

@@tenchitag no one saw any such thing 🤣🤣🤣

[@jwait1496]

@@laneybobs8157AKA Sophie. We don't need to pretend. There is solid evidence it was on the 24th. S Todd was a three stike offender that carries 25 years in prison under California State Law. Sounds like a pretty good motive to me. And why did police ignore the America's most wanted tip? And ignore the others that were involved. Oh right you were told this numerous times and you're here acting like you don't know.

[@petelikedporn6009]

@@tenchitag it wasn't the same day. The other neighbor came home 5 minutes after the lady saw a white van and there was nothing there. The lady who saw a van was mistaken. She didn't see anything except landscapers.

[@MrMcsia]

"Laci, I lost my wife!" -- Scott 14 days before Laci went missing. End of the case.

[@thecozyconstellation]

right! it couldn't have been a crazy coincidence that 2 weeks later she ends up dead. that was his only true confession!

[@elaineparisi8626]

Well in my opinion Scott is innocent!! That first trial was like a witch hunt trial!!

[@glynisparry3894]

Hello Elaine. Good to hear someone else believes Scott Peterson Is Innocent and has the courage to say so

[@sophie8394]

Saying Scott Peterson is innocent isn't just an opinion. You're implying you know more than the investigators, prosecutors, judge, jury, the Supreme Court Justices who re-examined all of the evidence in this case in the direct appeal and upheld his guilty conviction.

[@chrisharger6]

That's what I think too. There is no direct evidence connecting him to the crime like DNA, surveillance video, confession, etc. It is all circumstantial. Dan is wrong and so are those attorneys. He stands a good chance of having his conviction overturned. The California Supreme Court didn't just order the trial judge to determine if there was prejudicial misconduct for no reason. The defense has proven their case so far to have it overturned, former prosecutors even said so themselves.

[@sophie8394]

@@chrisharger6 are you high? 😂😂😂

[@sophie8394]

@@chrisharger6 who's Dan?

[@jacobhughes9010]

Also he without question did not have 12 impartial jurors

[@sophie8394]

The Supreme Court and Superior Court of California say otherwise. You must know something they don't 😂

[@glynisparry3894]

Message for Sophie. Sophie please let's not fall out over Innocent or guilty .This section Is for men and women to leave their personal comments - If you like It can be somewhat used as a discussion - I have only aired my opinion as to why I don't think him Innocent and I welcome comments but not from people who are obviously cross so no more direct messages to me please. Thank you .

[@sophie8394]

When did I direct msg you? Never. You have replied to me countless times asking questions and I have provided you with the facts. You still don't get it. Not my problem. That's why I haven't paid any attention to any of your replies for weeks. Stop spreading lies with my name on it.

[@vincentpaliobagis5680]

@@sophie8394 you provide zero facts or evidence. but thats what we get from liberal idiot logic like you.

[@aok4418]

@@sophie8394 She's not the one spreading lies, Ang Dee Jones. These are a few of your lies. QUOTE " there's nothing I haven't reviewed. I've been reviewing it for more than 10 years. I'm not impressed by KZbin legal experts. And for the 2nd time. RN did NOT co author a book. The fact you don't even know that tells me everything I need to know about your expertise. " FACT RN did co author a book called 'we, the jury' QUOTE ("Even though Ron already had a boat and a better one at that.... LOL") FACT Ron didn't have a boat. He had a float tube. QUOTE (...you don't have an explanation for why SP refused to even speak to John Walsh...") FACT He did speak to John walsh. Get your facts straight, stalker! John Walsh: "I talked to Scott on the phone for about 45 minutes and his parents for about an hour," Walsh said in the lobby of the DoubleTree Hotel. " -You said Scott did not have an anchor rope, FALSE. I even gave you the exhibit number. QUOTE ("Even though Ron already had a boat and a better one at that.... LOL") FACT Ron didn't have a boat. He had a float tube.

[@histacey]

Where are the facts? only hits the basic talking points and doesn’t mention the ignored timeline evidence , witnesses, and even recorded jail conversion that points to the robbers. The investigators released his alibi to the world which gave the people who actually did it the perfect place to dispose of their crimes.

[@sophie8394]

Watch the Peterson family documentary much? 🙄

[@mmanda515]

Someone may have been in a toxic relationship at some point..... & STILL be able to remain unbiased.

[@brittaolson6550]

Right? Like…who hasn’t?

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

mmanda515, thank you. I totally agree.

[@joan6984]

You hit the nail on the head. NG. has a following. I guess she has credentials some admire I personally always thought she was a troublemaker troublemaker not too bright show person anyhow that’s my opinion worth nothing but a lot of people really admire her I think she’s all that and she is the leader of this trashing Scott it’s amazing to me how people can be so assuming .

[@scourge8097]

She quite literally admitted going in she knew he was guilty. Also...that's not for you to decide. That's the ENTIRE point of questionnaire's during voir dire. To eliminate as much bias as possible. So even if this women WASN'T the women for whom the term "rogue juror" was coined, the defense still had every right to know. She was the loudest and most aggressive during deliberations. She committed perjury...pure and simple. That is a felony. She committed a FELONY to get on the Jury. That should tell you how "unbiased" she was.

[@scourge8097]

@@brittaolson6550 Well...the part where she perjured herself was not when she was asked "have you been in a toxic relationship," it was asking if she'd ever been involved in any court proceedings EXCLUDING DIVORCE. She lied and...as I said, very literally committed a felony.

[@firepixie3820]

Changing his sentence from death penalty to life in prison is fine, it was the headline of this video that seemed to be misleading ... of course he's guilty ... At that really nice vigil he attended for Lacey, he was on the phone with Amber telling her he was in Paris.. 🤦‍♀️

[@sweetzylady25]

100 percent agree! If you are at a vigil for ur wife and unborn son and u are calling ur girlfriend saying u are in Paris. I mean you don't need more proof then that he is a pathological liar. And the fact that he didn't want his face on the news or on pictures 🤔

[@tonyallewellyn7304]

@@sweetzylady25 yep, I completely agree

[@jenniferscott3176]

do u mean the one before they found her body 🤔 because they had multiple ones before they found her body he was under belief he was in the dog house she caught him because he cheated the day she went missing that's where he was after popping the boat in water then taking out again to make evidence he was fishing not being a cheater yet news wants u to think she was dead before then she wasn't dead until Jan 3rd 10 days after her missing they did one the first week she was missing which he was in belief she took off being mad at him and would come back when the baby came or after to hurt him he had no idea she had been kidnapped until her body was found in the location that had been searched multiple times and was on the news with him and her mother durning the beginning he couldn't have dumped her after 24th because he was being followed by both police and media since that date the police blamed him because he didn't tell them about amber til much later on I think just day before the body was found they had recording of her and asked him about her he denied again then she went on news and told her bs of lies didn't tell him what she was doing she ambushed lacys parents and gave them so many lies on news conference she called while he was at a interview with some media outlet he had no idea anything was wrong until her body showed up that's when he went into deep depression lost it meanwhile amber was telling all kind of lies remember he wasn't honest with her ever because she was just a sex thing he was doing while his wife was pregnant and had planed on dumping her once baby born so when she figured that out she went all on attack on him on national TV and to lacy parents but she u have to remember Facebook was just out and popular Scott and lacy had a account so at some point she knew and never told him she knew there is more proof amber killed laci and conner then Scott doing anything there is no motive at all for him to kill his wife he wasn't capable of dumping her body as he was stalked and recorder 24/7 the police believed she died before day one and in trail they gave that date it wasn't til much later after trial the medical examer claimed she died Jan 3rd but wasn't allowed in court how is something as big a date of death to a crime not allowed in trail for someone life please tell me because this scares the hell out of me the power of proof showing no crime being done gets you locked up in prison for 20 years along with investigating never happened along with lawyer not allowed to give evidence to defend him so much injustice its crazy and the public outcry is insane as well this news feed is crazy they had a confession of accident of killing her by robbers and they lost tape police claimed they were lookgin for fame I don't know anyone who would say they killed someone and police didn't go on it even with the evidence given then told not allowed in court and lost tape by prosecution this whole thing is crazy setup and giant miscarriage of justice ever done media have no right to announce every night information on ongoing case which is why body was dumped in previous searched location and the police time line was proved wrong still didn't change it in court

[@jenniferscott3176]

@@sweetzylady25 amber liar she claimed she never saw him he was on every channel all over the world 24 7 since day one but she didn't see him odd right her lies seem to be more guilty then him

[@laneybobs8157]

@@jenniferscott3176 your lack of punctuation marks is killing me! Good imagination. You missed the GUILTY theme. Must try harder Jen!

[@jacobhughes9010]

As someone from Modesto MPD did a absolute awful job and all that was proved was that Scott cheated on his wife which is a awful thing to do but is not a crime

[@sophie8394]

Over 90 LE agencies participated in this investigation including the FBI and the DOJ. Did they all do an awful job?

[@aok4418]

@Sophie None of those agencies were in charge of the investigation.

[@brennanhuff2960]

90 agencies involved, yet not one of them turned up evidence of guilt. A large portion of those resources were dedicated to the Bay search efforts.. and the very best that they came up with was a Snapple bottle, twigs, and random trash.

[@aok4418]

@Brennan Huff Patty is still spreading her lies as usual under the "Dead to me" channel. Then Sophie behind like a sick little puppy.

[@aok4418]

@Sophie Can you post a source proving "Scott gave several stories about how he cut his hand"? It was just yesterday you said that again, knowing full well it's not true. Scott's cut on his hand GROGAN: Okay. What ah-ah I didn’t notice any there that night but-did ah-what was in there that cut ya? PETERSON: I don’t know what it was, it was probably just the ah door or the pocket or somethin’. ___ knuckle. Still my hand I-you know-I keep cuttin’ it handlin’ out flyers so-that’s the reasons I-keep rememberin’ it. ------‐--------------‐----------------------------- Gomez: Doing what? Peterson: Um, reaching in to the toolbox of my truck and then into, uh the pocket of the door. I cut open my knuckle and there's a bloodstain on the door. On the divers side door. -------------------------------------------------- Peterson: These were vehicles that both of us were in on a continuous basis. Uhm.. I know for a fact there'll be plenty blood in there from me. You know I, I work on farms, and you look at my hands now and they have cuts all over them. Sawyer: They do?

[@carolinag2780]

Guilty. Nothing has changed. If anything throughout the years we keep seeing the same crime through different victims just like Chris watts

[@diamondgirl6716]

Then open your mind and start thinking about other possibilities instead of the easiest person to convict. Things are usually a little more complicated than that with these types of not so ordinary crimes. Otherwise, yeah, we'll be seeing a lot more like this if we keep convicting the wrong people. The real dangerous criminals are winning and free to continue to destroy lives while everyone else is distracted and chasing the wrong rabbit.

[@sophie8394]

@@diamondgirl6716 the easiest people to convict would have been the burglars. Done in a week instead of 4 months. There just wasn't any evidence tying them to the crime. There wasn't any evidence tying ANYONE to the crime except for Scott. They couldn't eliminate him.

[@Tboy439]

@@sophie8394 ...The only actual evidence pointed to the burglars who robbed the house across the street. And all that evidence was ignored. The 2 guys who were robbing the house across the street, told the cops that they had done it on the 26th and not the 24th, as they were trying to distance themselves from the crime against Laci. And for the sake of keeping their laser focus on Scott, they believed the robbers. The problem with this is the fact that by the morning of the 26th, as confirmed by neighbors, the street in front of Scott's house was a parking lot with reporters and camera by that time with reporters waiting like sharks to interview anyone they saw in the neighborhood to get an interview. So anyone who believes that they did it on the 26th, I've got some land I want to sell them when the tide goes out, yet the police took their word. Furthermore, One of the robbers had a brother in jail where all phone calls are recorded. in a conversation with his brother he states that a lady had confronted them when they were robbing the house. Once again, this was ignored so they could keep their laser focus on Scott. Also, a women who had ties to one of the robbers pawned Laci's watch on Dec, 29. But again, this somehow was ignored. Furthermore, the states case is totally predicated on the fact that Scott killed Laci on the night of the 23rd, and instead of getting rid of her body in the dark of night, he waited until daylight and went to a place where their were plenty potential witnesses to get rid of her body. I don't know about you, but that just doesn't pass the smell test for me. Also the states case is totally dependent on the fact that Laci was already dead on the 24th before Scott went fishing. The problem with this is they have now found the path that Laci took the dog for a walk and have found 11 people who saw Laci walking her dog that morning. The irony of this is that 4 of them stated they had called the police to report this, and phone records show they did in fact call the police, but yet this was shoved under the rug, as it would have completely destroyed the states case. Also, a neighbor lady reported that she had found the dog running loose with it's leash on and took her to Scott and Laci's house and put him in the fenced in back yard where Scott would later find him. Also, the mailman stated that the dog, if it were home, it would go crazy barking at him, and said there was no barking that morning. All of this backs up Scotts story that Laci's plan for the morning was to take the dog for a walk and then go shopping, which if true, destroys the states case All actual evidence points to the two burglars were the murderers to get rid of a witness. As big as this case was, do you ever wonder why it wasn't televised? The reason is two fold. they did not want America to see what a railroad job they did, and there would a lot more people screaming bloody murder, and they didn't want any of those people who saw Laci alive to see the trial, otherwise they have may approached the defense team and destroy the states case. Scott haters really need to start praying that Scott does not get a new trial, because he will be found not guilty and walk out a very rich man when the truth is exposed of all the cover-ups

[@sophie8394]

@@Tboy439 I'm not even wasting time reading all of this bc what I have read has all been debunked and tossed out by the court for having no merit. Do some research before you comment.

[@diamondgirl6716]

@@Tboy439 You got that right about the dumb luck of the burglars and the even dumber female friend who pawned the watch. Bad timing since before this happened, I haven't ever heard of any robberies like that in that neighborhood in all the years that I lived near there and roamed through it. In broad daylight too? And all the nice homes there, they chose THAT one? Wow, that sucks. Back in the 80's, I remember a cat burglar who was a fugitive from Texas that was creeping around Modesto. MPD actually came in my house and all my neighbors houses by the airport looking for him. They told us who they were looking for, why they were looking for him and they believed he may have been hiding on one of our properties. Sure they were really robbing the place? Is that what they admitted too. I find something off with that too.

[@Carolanne1926]

Why do all these cases never get investigated properly and what about the burgerlars that broken into the house across the street when laci was walking the dog question's remain im not saying hes inoccent at all but this bothers me

[@sophie8394]

Who says it wasn't investigated properly? The burglary happened 2 days after Laci was murdered.

[@aok4418]

@@sophie8394 Lol, you keep repeating that lie. Burglars pled guilty to charges dated 12-24-02. Criminal charges dated 12-26-02 were dismissed. Stanislaus County Portal.

[@aok4418]

True, the MPD were incompetent. They failed to follow up on the sightings of Laci and they failed to properly investigate the burglary in regard to her disappearance. There are over a dozen credible sightings of Laci and McKenzie. The MPD lies until this day, insisting they found the woman that was mistaken for Laci. That never happened. Then there is Russell Graybill who told officers on 12-27-02 that the gate was open and McKenzie was not on the property when he delivered mail to their house between 10:35 and 10:50 that morning. The MPD claimed that Laci had gone missing before Karen Servas put the dog back in the yard and closed the gate. That information alone shows that Laci was walking McKenzie when Graybill devered the mail. Otherwise the gate would have been closed and McKenzie would have been barking at him. Officer Callahan …“[Graybill] said he entered the area around 1030 to 1045 in the morning. He said he couldn’t remember anything unusual from 516 Covena, but remembered the gate was open at 523 Covena. He said usually the dog barks at him from behind the gate. On 12-24-02 the gate was open and he did not see or hear the dog at 523 Covena.” (See Exh. 3 at HCP-00008.) December 27, 2002, Graybill was interviewed Officer M. Callahan and Detective Skultety of the Modesto Police Department. According to Callahan’s handwritten police report, Graybill stated the following in response to the officer’s question “what he remembered from December 24, 2002 when he delivered mail in this area”: ……………“[Graybill] said he entered the area around 1030 to 1045 in the morning. He said he couldn’t remember anything unusual from 516 Covena, but remembered the gate was open at 523 Covena. He said usually the dog barks at him from behind the gate. On 12-24-02 the gate was open and he did not see or hear the dog at 523 Covena.” (See Exh. 3 at HCP-00008.) More text from the habeas document: Graybill was the Petersons’ postman, and he delivered mail to the Peterson home between 10:35 and 10:50 a.m. on December 24, 2002. (Exhibit 2 [Declaration of Russell Graybill] at HCP-000005-06; Exhibit 19 [Russell Graybill’s Delivery Record].) Graybill knew the Petersons’ dog, McKenzi, and explained to police (and has recently declared) that McKenzi would bark at him no matter where on the property the dog happened to be. (Exhibit 3 [Statement of Russell Graybill] at HCP-000008.) Whether the dog was in the front or back yards, or even inside the house, McKenzi would bark at Graybill. (Exh. 2 at HCP-000005.) Graybill There was a schedule that Graybill printed out showing his scan times for December 24. It includes a notation about the time he delivered mail to the Peterson house. This was entered as Exhibit 34. He arrived at his first scan at 10:19 a.m. and at his last scan at 3:41 p.m. for a total of 5 hours and 22 minutes delivery time. This is all documented in trial records. The gate was open and McKenzie was not on the property at the time he delivered mail to the Peterson house between 10:35 and 10:50. This proves Laci was NOT missing since we know Karen Servas put McKenzie back in the yard before Graybill delivered the mail.

[@aok4418]

Brent Rocha testified that by the 26th, the media was "encamped" around the house. The volunteer center was set up at the house and a large number of family, friends, and volunteers were in and out of the home consistently since the evening of December 24th. Are we really supposed to believe that Todd rode his bike through the park and eventually right by the Peterson home on Covena Ave on Christmas Day, and did not happen to notice the police cars, police tape, police on horses, police searching the creek in the park, media vehicles, and family, friends, and volunteers? We're supposed to believe, since the "detectives" did, that this burglar, who already has a criminal history and is observant enough to notice the mail sticking out of the mailbox, missed all the chaos and police activity on the street? And while we're talking about timeline, does it really sound reasonable that an elderly woman is feeding her cats outside at 3:30 in the morning? The Bike: Steve Todd claims he used only his bike and backpack to transport all the items he stole, except the safe. He claims he had his friend use his small white car to transport the safe to his house. The police went to Todd's and Pearce's home and found some of the items that were stolen from the Medinas. Let's take a look at a list of just the items that were never recovered: Fire Fyter Safe 2500 Antique Ivory Hand figure pliers set 4 cycle gas trimmer Rolling tool box 3/5 Drill Small pliers 32 piece airtool Craftsman reciprocating saw Reciprocating blade Craftsman sabre saw sabre blade Polaroid camera Canon camera photo lens portrait lens regular lens power winder finishing sander Black & Decker drill Louis Vuitton bag FF Safe 2500 $189 Linx knife trimmer line drill bit Bypass pruner grip wrench pliers set tool -plier automotive tool 2 poly rope Bostich brad nailer clutch driver mechanic tool set power bit 65 pc. Bit set recon. Edger stud sensor 24 inch tool box tie nipper B&D hedge trimmer ratchet tie down Polaroid 600 camera bag, canvas camera accessory new French door keys Binocular, Bushnell 2 sm. Binocular gun bag for Beretta Trimmer, speed space Jewelry box, walnut Jewelry box, oak Numerous tools in the tool box Not only does this completely discredit Todd's story and reveal that he is being anything but truthful about his story, it brings into question: How did he transport all of these items to his house? And how long would it take to load and transport all these items - plus the items that weren't recovered? Remember, Todd says it wasn't until the morning of the 26th between 4:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. that he even entered the home, and was home by 6:30 a.m. to wake up his friend and get him to load up the safe. We know from trial transcripts that people started arriving at the Peterson's home by 8:00 a.m. on the 26th to begin their search for Laci, and there likely was media still on the street from the night before. How in the world did he transport all of those items without one person seeing him? There is no doubt that a vehicle other than a bike was needed to transport this list of items - something more like a van. The "van" is a whole issue in and of itself and will be another article posted in the near future. For now, remember that a neighbor reported seeing a van at 11:40 a.m. with a dolly and three men in front of the Medina's house on December 24th, the morning Laci disappeared. The Mailbox: Simply from the testimony of the Medina's and the mailman we can actually place Steve Todd in front of Laci's house between 10:35 a.m. and 10:50 a.m. the morning she disappeared. (The "detectives" couldn't figure this out - we had to - after Scott is already sitting on death row.) Susan Medina testified that as she and her husband were pulling out of their driveway at 10:32 a.m., on December 24th to go to Los Angeles, she had her husband put some outgoing mail in their mailbox. She testified that because she works from home, she has a special mailbox to help ensure that none of her mail would be stolen. The outgoing letters would stick out of the mailbox, but once those were taken, the incoming mail would drop deep down into the mailbox. Incoming mail could not be seen. They had this specific mailbox due to the amount of transients walking down their street and she wanted to be sure her mail was safe (they had a problem with homeless people coming out of the park entrance on Covena Avenue and walking down Covena on their way to the Mission). Medina testified that when she returned home on December 26th, she had 2 or 3 small letters in the mailbox which were not sticking out of the mailbox - you had to reach in and pull the mail out. So, for Steven Todd to see mail sticking out of the mailbox would mean he saw their outgoing mail on December 24th. The mailman testified that he picked up and delivered mail to the Medina's house sometime between 10:35 and 10:50 that day. So, from Steven Todd's own statement, we know he absolutely did not see this "full mailbox" on Christmas Day, like he claims, but instead saw it sometime between 10:32 and 10:50 on the morning Laci disappeared, December 24, 2002. An eye-witness to the burglary: Perhaps the most compelling evidence that makes it obvious that the burglary occurred on December 24th is the tip from a neighbor who called to report seeing three men and a van in front of the Medina's house at 11:40 a.m. on Christmas Eve. She reported seeing a safe being removed from the house. Her information was deemed so credible by the police that that a flyer requesting information and offering a reward was made based on her information.

[@ParDiss-e4i]

"Strangers can't be stalkers"= American common law.

[@JM-zk9ou]

No, no he couldn't. He did it. Everything points to him. Eye witnesses who said that they saw Laci walking the dog said that she was in the black pants and white top states on the missing person fliers. Her body was found with tan pants. Also, witness statements conflicted with each other such that none were reliable (even if she had been in black pants.) There is a very long list of issues with the defense and family's assertions.

[@Ciana_Baby]

She could have pissed herself and changed pants

[@elysciasaint-hilaire984]

There’s not any forensic evidence to convict him. That’s why people doubt it. People convicted him based off of him being a terrible husband and a cheater but negate everything that could possibly point to someone else

[@sophie8394]

Please tell me what evidence points to anyone but Scott.

[@sophie8394]

🦗🦗🦗

[@Solitude47152]

@@sophie8394 The Burglary across the street which the prosecution refused to turn over discovery

[@sophie8394]

@@Solitude47152 you really need to stop commenting about things you know nothing about. I'm embarrassed for you. The burglary happened on the 26th. Already proven and deemed by the court to have no merit (that means it's not a thing)

[@Solitude47152]

@@sophie8394 incorrect

[@glynisparry3894]

Sophie unless you knew Sharon Rocha personally and were with her the first week Laci vanished then you cannot say she thought Scott guilty In that first week - I am sorry to say that Is just not true and It Is your own opinion

[@carried5899]

Sophie also says everyone took a polygram test including stepdad and mom..said a officer watching over them told her.... Everyone.... never does such a thing. Or at least I never heard of it. There is a lot of lies in this world. WoW

[@glynisparry3894]

Sophie Is adamant he Is guilty but I believe a new trial would exonerate him am hoping this will happen soon@@carried5899

[@carried5899]

@@glynisparry3894 I hoping too.

[@sophie8394]

Why do you post comments with my name in them? Sharon Rocha has stated in a Dateline interview that by Dec 31st she had made a list of "Did he?" and "Didn't he?" and there was a lot more 'did' than 'didn't' I don't post my opinions. I post facts.

[@laneybobs8157]

Glynis and Carrie - You two can always become Scott's pen pals. Ya know, write him and pour your little black hearts out. Get his hopes up too. So when reality kicks in Scott will be begging for the death penalty to be carried out!

[@elenakonstantinou8566]

I really know what the evidence is and truly I say unto you guys, chill down, the conviction must be overturned, because there was no first degree murder proved in this case.

[@sophie8394]

Uh...there obviously was

[@franciscomontes5153]

I agree! even if he is guilty, it was not proven. That's the point of the judicial system. This should scare every American.

[@sophie8394]

@@franciscomontes5153 it was proven. If you "watched the trial" as you claim, you would know that 🤣🤣

[@kenannon5604]

@@sophie8394 the trial was not televised and there were no cameras in the courtroom so nobody "watched" the trial. Only thing televised was the media circus.

[@sophie8394]

@@kenannon5604 I know that. Some people ^ claim to have watched the whole trial 🙄

[@davidparsons2977]

The police seem to have forgot to apply forensics to the burglars' vehicle and residences. Also, the witnesses in the neighborhood who saw Laci walking her dog were never entered into evidence in the trial. I would say that the investigation may have been flawed.

[@sophie8394]

How do you know what was applied or not in this investigation? The burglars didn't own a vehicle and their places of residence were most certainly investigated. No connection to Laci was found There are witnesses who CLAIM to have seen Laci. Big difference. The fact is no one who knew Laci spoke to her or saw her after the 23rd. None of these witnesses were viable and none could be corroborated. That's why they didn't testify.

[@angelaconner3131]

Exactly.

[@CharismaRipple1977]

mine you someone took that tape of the recored prisoners convo stating lacy got into argument with the two people that broke into the house about the break in across the street and got rid of it it never made it to court documents either @david Parsons

[@sophie8394]

@@CharismaRipple1977 there was no tape 🤣🤣🤣

[@jenniferscott3176]

@@sophie8394 it was played nightly on the news I saw it on news feeds at time alot I even think Nancy grace played it calling the lady a liar because she called 911 but the police didn't come out so Nancy assured the people police wouldn't do that they would investigate if happened but it did 3 people made statements to clothing the men where wearing what she was wearing 1 had the dog with her 2 didn't 1 was she was shoved in van

[@indesdaryl]

100% not guilty

[@sophie8394]

100% guilty

[@glynisparry3894]

Yes more Innocent than guilty. Why would he put his wifes body In the water and then tell the police that was exactly where he went fishing.

[@sophie8394]

@@glynisparry3894 simple. He never thought the bodies would surface.

[@glynisparry3894]

I agree anyone who put concrete anchors around a body would not expect that body to surface but the facts listed by the autopsy don't quite tie up after reading the first book. Maybe you know more sophie.

[@sophie8394]

@@glynisparry3894 what facts are you referring to?

[@davidparsons2977]

​ @Sophie The burglars likely were using a stolen van, and apparently some kind of cellmate pillow talk will be entered in evidence if there is a retrial. The burglars stole a safe across the street, and that cannot be done on foot.

[@sophie8394]

The van belonged to a neighbor. It was her work van and she testified that it was parked on the street all day. The burglary occurred in the early morning hours of the 26th. When Todd and Pearce returned in a borrowed car to retrieve the safe they had left behind they saw Ted Rowlands down the street and described his news truck to police and exactly where it was parked.

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

@@sophie8394 yep! How come people don't know any of this, but, still feel like they can form an opinion? I mean, I don't like to form an opinion til I know all the facts. I guess that's just me. 🙂

[@sophie8394]

@@reneenayfabnaynay5679 so much misinformation out there 🙄 I listened to a podcast the other day where one of the hosts didn't know that Laci was pregnant 😳 People get sucked into podcasts and documentaries instead of doing the research. Or believing those who have. I have personally never seen a group of people so afraid of the truth as the ones who support Scott Peterson.

[@Dark_Helmet734]

@@sophie8394 There is an ew documentry that proves The police falsified the burglary report it happened days earlier and witnesses claim Laci confronted them

[@sophie8394]

@@Dark_Helmet734 a documentary that PROVES something? Please 🙄

[@Clearly69]

How innocent is Scott? About as innocent as OJ.

[@Zahra-lc3mj]

I think both didn’t do it. It’s easy to blame the husband or ex husband but it’s known the cops didn’t explore other leads. Like OJs eldest son for example with bipolar disorder and an obsession with Nicole who was a chef (had access to knives), and threatened to stab an ex girlfriend before, he hated and fantasized about his stepmom Nicole. The glove was small because it belonged to OJs son, and the blood was somewhat a match because it was his son. OJ was known to be so squeamish of blood- movie directors didn’t think he’d play a good villain. He had his son see a shrink and get medication for rage and bipolar disorder. The son Jason stopped taking the meds right before the murder. OJ also hired an attorney for himself and Jason right before the infamous Bronco chase. Why hire one for his son? LAPD didn’t ping this as strange? As for Peterson, there were burglars who robbed the house next door to Laci and Scott’s on Dec 24th and a nurse who recalled seeing two dark skinned men walking to a white van holding Laci by the arms and telling her to shut that dog up while the dog Mackenzie was barking like crazy. Having an affair doesn’t make Scott guilty of murder. There were other lies also put out there as well. For example, the marina was searched right after she went missing multiple times and Lacis body was not found in the water Scott was fishing in at all in December or January 2003 or February 2003. Her body and Connors body suddenly appears there in April. 4 months later.

[@sophie8394]

@@Zahra-lc3mj do you belong to The Flat Earth Society too?

[@Zahra-lc3mj]

@@sophie8394 no, but nice sarcasm. That’s the best you got? Don’t get your trial info from TV

[@sophie8394]

@@Zahra-lc3mj I don't. But you obviously get yours from documentaries and podcasts.

[@aok4418]

@Sophie QUOTE " there's nothing I haven't reviewed. I've been reviewing it for more than 10 years. I'm not impressed by KZbin legal experts. And for the 2nd time. RN did NOT co author a book. The fact you don't even know that tells me everything I need to know about your expertise. " FACT RN did co author a book called 'we, the jury' QUOTE ("Are you aware the boat was never registered") FACT The boat WAS registered. The correct information including his name and address was filed with the DMV on 12-9-02. QUOTE ("Even though Ron already had a boat and a better one at that.... LOL") FACT Ron didn't have a boat. He had a float tube. QUOTE (...you don't have an explanation for why SP refused to even speak to John Walsh...") FACT He did speak to John walsh. Get your facts straight, stalker! John Walsh: "I talked to Scott on the phone for about 45 minutes and his parents for about an hour," Walsh said in the lobby of the DoubleTree Hotel. " -You said Scott did not have an anchor rope, FALSE. I even gave you the exhibit number.

[@Guitarlvr01]

I have always had an unpopular opinion. I’m not convinced at all! A lot of circumstantial evidence but def not enough to convict and it’s shocking to me he was. Being a cheater is awful but it doesn’t make you a murderer. However his behavior after her death screams psychopath. I still think the world is better off with him locked up.

[@twills-lv7cz]

so finding her body, 90 miles away from their home, in the exact spot that SP was 'fishing' that day is not enough? Seriously?? So, if it's not Scott, then we must believe he's the unluckiest man alive -- sure that makes more sense.

[@Guitarlvr01]

@@twills-lv7cz I didn’t know their bodies were found in the same spot he went fishing. I just knew it was the same body of water and a lot of killers hide bodies in water.

[@twills-lv7cz]

@@Guitarlvr01 did you also not know that after Laci went missing, Scott continued to pursue his side piece? In a time when you’d think that could be the most stressful event of your life, your wife and unborn child are MISSING….yah not for Scott, he was still trying to get laid.

[@Guitarlvr01]

@@twills-lv7cz I knew that and that’s why I said, cheater doesn’t = murderer. Lots of cheaters don’t kill their spouses. That’s not evidence of murder. It’s just not.

[@twills-lv7cz]

@@Guitarlvr01 if you can’t see that all those pieces added up paint a picture of guilt, then you just lack common sense…it’s that simple. So Jamie, if Scott didn’t do it, who did?

[@acpren]

Grateful for Mark's reassuring answers!

[@joan6984]

Who’s Mark?

[@acpren]

@@joan6984 Mark Eiglash interviewed on video. Watch the video.

[@jenniferscott3176]

the moron who is bias

[@ar1535]

Scott is so guilty.. please stop with all this bS .. so sad for laci’s family to go through this again

[@JulieR73]

Scott is guilty as hell!

[@zhaneranger]

No. He is guilty.

[@underthestaircase]

I disagree. I watched the trial back then and thought scott was guilty. But hearing the evidence that was with held at trial I'm not so sure. I think he deserves to have all the evidence presented.

[@sophie8394]

How did you watch a trial that wasn't televised?

[@sophie8394]

🦗🦗🦗

[@petelikedporn6009]

@@sophie8394boy there are a lot of people who know this case- NOT. These comments on this video are hilarious. You can't help them, too far gone and not an ounce of information in their brains about what actually happened in this case. Sad

[@sophie8394]

@@petelikedporn6009 the ones who say they watched a trial that wasn't televised are my favorite 🤣🤣

[@yogabee2222]

Scott is horrible. I hope the general population takes care of him.

[@jwait1496]

I hope you educate yourself about the case.

[@sophie8394]

@@jwait1496 are you actually telling someone to educate themselves? 🤣🤣🤣 Practice what you preach Kathryn. Maybe then you wouldn't go around telling people that the real killers kept Laci's body in a giant fish tank 🤣 Or that Scott was out on bail 🤣 Or that a seagull dropped Conner's body on the shore 🤣 Or that Scott passed his polygraph 🤣 I could go on all night...

[@jwait1496]

@@sophie8394 I'm not Kathryn and we both know you're really desperate at this point. I've never said any of those things. Why would Laci being kept in a fish tank coincide with anything I've said. Use your head for something other than smashing rocks for once.

[@amroark]

"Ignorance is what fuels so many people's misguided thoughts these days." I would challenge the "these days" part tbh, but he nailed it.

[@joserojas1532]

Well he's complaining about social media having an impact on young persons about Scott innocence WHAT??? Back in 2003 the news and reporters play the same brainwashing in the public, he was guilty just because the news were saying he was ! Come on what is he talking about?

[@Kimber123]

Clearly he was talking about his own ignorance as well as Abrams'.

[@bryanrackard4063]

This guy is about as innocent as OJ Simpson......

[@wln8888]

💯

[@mikeverderosa3601]

Been saying he was innocent for 17 years

[@sophie8394]

You've been wrong for a long time then.

[@jwait1496]

@@sophie8394 You should work on your research before saying someone is wrong. QUOTE " there's nothing I haven't reviewed. I've been reviewing it for more than 10 years. I'm not impressed by KZbin legal experts. And for the 2nd time. RN did NOT co auther a book. The fact you don't even know that tells me everything I need to know about your expertise. " FACT RN did co auther a book called 'we, the jury' QUOTE ("Are you aware the boat was never registered") FACT The boat WAS registered. The correct information including his name and address was filed with the DMV on 12-9-02. QUOTE ("Scott called Sharon and immediately said Laci is missing without asking if she had heard from her or seen her") FACT -DISTASO: And can you tell the jury, just tell us what happened. ROCHA: When he called he said, "Hi, Mom." He said, "Is Laci there with you or over there?" And I said, "No." And he said that her car is there, was there in the driveway and the dog was in the backward with the leash on and Laci was missing. I remember telling him to call her friends to see if anybody had seen or talked to her that day..... QUOTE ("Even though Ron already had a boat and a better one at that.... LOL") FACT Ron didn't have a boat. He had a float tube. QUOTE ("Laci's hair was was found wound tightly in some pliers on the boat") FACT Hair was not wrapped around the pliers, and it was never proven to be Laci's hair. HENDEE: No, it didn't wrap around the pliers, didn't wrap around the needle nose. It just went through. It looked like at one location it just went through the pliers. QUOTE ("Scott transferred the marina ticket to his clean pants") FACT EVERS: And he said, in fact, I have a parking receipt, would you like to see it? DISTASO: And what did you say? EVERS: I said yes. DISTASO: Okay. And did he go somewhere and get a parking receipt for you? EVERS: Yes, he did. DISTASO: Do you know where he went? EVERS: Yes, I do. DISTASO: Where was that? EVERS: He opened up the, he opened up the door to his truck, and reached in, and pulled a receipt from the ashtray. QUOTE ("Scott told Ron he was golfing") FACT Scott did NOT tell Ron he was golfing. He didn't talk to Ron until later and when he did, he said he was fishing. QUOTE ("Scott called Sharon and immediately said Laci is missing without asking if she had heard from her or seen her") FACT DISTASO: And can you tell the jury, just tell us what happened. ROCHA: When he called he said, "Hi, Mom." He said, "Is Laci there with you or over there?" And I said, "No." And he said that her car is there, was there in the driveway and the dog was in the backward with the leash on and Laci was missing. I remember telling him to call her friends to see if anybody had seen or talked to her that day..... QUOTE ("Robert Chacon was a lead detective who found evidence in the form of clay pots.") FACT Robert Chacon was not a lead detective, nor was there any evidence of clay pots ever entered as evidence. Robert Chacon was an FBI and no was not in charge of any if the bay searches either. QUOTE ("That's a bunch of BS. Full term healthy babies weigh between 6-9 lbs. Conner only weighed about three lbs.") FACT They measure bones to determine gestational age. They don't use weight of a decomposing fetus to determine age. 🤦‍♂️ QUOTE ("Vivian Mitchell couldn't have seen Laci because her husband Bill was home watching Football and ther was no football games that day.") FACT He said he had been searching on Christmas Eve for information or previews of bowl games to be played in the next few days. QUOTE ("Scott was researching paths of currents") FACT He was searching fishing game and boating regulations. Detective Wall clearly agreed on the stand he DID NOT search " currents" The website was "Department of Fish and Game" QUOTE (...you don't have an explanation for why SP refused to even speak to John Walsh...") FACT He did speak to John walsh. Get your facts straight, stalker! John Walsh: "I talked to Scott on the phone for about 45 minutes and his parents for about an hour," Walsh said in the lobby of the DoubleTree Hotel. "

[@sophie8394]

@@jwait1496 copy and paste crap and another Janey Peterson nickel for you 🤑

[@sophie8394]

@@jwait1496 try to get some fresh air today Kathryn.

[@jwait1496]

@@sophie8394 Do you know Stacey B personally? How would she feel if she knew some crazy stranger was putting words in her mouth, making false claims.

[@Naz-M]

NO HE ISNT.

[@El-cj3dd]

Watch th A & E documentary series I think it was done in 2017- I coud not believe all the evidence not submitted in th trial And th leads police disregarded - note the mailman found the gate Open after the dog was put back into yard Wel after scott gone from home plus the mail an did d Not hear th dog bark at him which it always did if at home wen he was delivering mail - so this can concurs with all the witnesses who saw laci walking dog

[@sophie8394]

You were duped by the Peterson family documentary. Sad.

[@kmremseysmith4771]

Dan love ya, but you're wrong on the Nice issues. She was not assaulted by a BF. His ex GF kicked Richelle Nice's car door. Nice filed a restraining order on her.

[@NoQuarterIsHere]

He has the same exact look on his face as Chauven.

[@johnblevins4920]

He is innocent and I’m the next Pope

[@joan6984]

How on earth can Lacis family believe Scotti is guilty? You knew him well. . You have a right you have a right to say to see SCE autopsies the reports especially corners which would prove essence of Scott that laptops he is not discussed much in fact he’s very little discussion of it it must tell the story how about the other women found in Lacey‘s condition in the same area no mention of that whatsoever there’s a lot to be said I don’t I’m not judging you but I don’t understand how you can be totally sure this guy did it did you by any chance read the book approve said he did he’s innocent how about all the witnesses that saw Lacey after Scott left that means nothing to you he’s a human being he’s a smart people isn’t a troublemaker yes he cheated felt terrible really is terrible it’s enough to divorce somebody but I don’t think I don’t know I didn’t know Lacey like you did but she’s probably not the type I heard he has some kind of sex problem I don’t know there is so much with you people are not regarding I kind of understand why she was your wife she would’ve been anyone’s life she’s adorable she was loving it’s Scott was actually a bastard yeah he cheated look at that boat now how could anyone how could something as large as her today if it would be OK to fit in that little dinghy sitting here two people well anyhow there’s a lot to be said in his behalf. I don’t know him but I feel terrible for him and his people saying there’s not a shot for him to get another trial which he he he didn’t do it for chrissake in that goddamn Nancy Grace oh my God she is a troublemaker she really is she has a cult following her whatever she says goes terrible terrible you never liked you to begin with he’s kind of jerky but now she’s terrible she’s a terrible human being she really is she has no class whatsoever none well I do hope that you can reconsider your thoughts and Scott I hope I wish you would read the book I don’t know the nameThe name of the book but you know what I’m talking about in detail it explains everything best of luck to you I hope you I hope you can find it in your heart you at least consider his innocence best you you bye. Actually Thanking it’s a lot easier than thinking I’m not gonna say anymore because it’s too tragic she made me love her actually she was a great woman going after those robbers best year best to you

[@sophie8394]

It actually hurt my brain to read this 😖

[@joan6984]

@@sophie8394 gee , Sophie….. wish I could remember title or authors name of the book I’m referring to. If you have a computer available you may find it. I tell you it’s worth the time and effort. Prior to reading it I believed he was gulty too ….of course…that’s all we heard. Please read it….he needs strong advocates such. as I’m sure you would be, please, And I’m sorry if this overly long statment gave you another headache, BTW yes, he was a lowlife to cheat on her a true scumbag but he didn’t kill her….read the book

[@sophie8394]

@@joan6984 I'm pretty sure I know what book you're referring to. Presumed Guilty by Matt Dalton. Matt Dalton is a lunatic who was fired by Geragos from Scott's defense team. That book is pure fiction. Scott Peterson is a murderer.

[@carried5899]

@@joan6984 I agree with you Joan. I do wish they would really dig deeper into this.

[@elizabethmelnychuk6034]

No

[@rosepetals6563]

👍👍👍Mark Eiglarsh

[@JayDogZA]

I covered the case myself in detail and I'm disturbed how acott was convicted. I'm not saying he didn't do it but doubt and doubt that's totally reasonable remains - the burglars, the 2 witnesses, the lack of any physical evidence, the dog on the leash, the disparity in decomposition decomposition of the two bodies - the baby has already been born. There's a lot. . . Doubt

[@sophie8394]

Covered the case in detail? What does that mean?

[@sophie8394]

👌

[@aok4418]

@sophie8394 It means she most likely read things like trial transcripts, appeals etc...you should try it.

[@sophie8394]

​@@aok4418Hi Kathy 👋 Still stalking me?

[@aok4418]

@@sophie8394 What goes around comes around, VideoFanatic02

[@ssherrierable]

It’s not impossible for all the circumstantial evidence in this case to have happened without Scott being the killer. That’s why they didn’t prove him guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. Someone else could have killed her and dumped her in the bay. Without physical evidence it’s not enough to find him guilty. I 1,000% think he did it myself but I can’t prove it. It’s just my opinion.

[@sophie8394]

Who told you there wasn't any physical evidence?

[@sophie8394]

*NEWSFLASH* He was proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt 🙄

[@NoSpam1891]

I can easily show they didn't prove it and *CAN* prove he's innocent.

[@sophie8394]

​@@NoSpam1891 😂😂😂😂😂

[@michael-m]

Man, Dan is just a really good guy. See how much respect he has for Laci and her parents like apologizing for saying her name wrong. Just great 👍🏼 👌

[@michael-m]

@clairl well said

[@Kimber123]

Dan Abrams is a friggin' douchebag.

[@waynearnold889]

No solid proof , just a lot of thought that he did it but not one ounce of solid proof just a bunch of hearsay.

[@sophie8394]

Riiiiiight 🥴

[@cass.707]

And the reason everyone thought he was guilty is because the media and Nancy Grace and Nancy Grace's horrible human being and she's not fair

[@garymorris1856]

I have watched Nancy Grace many times in regard to this case and many others, and her approach is always the same, guilty until proven innocent.

[@garymorris1856]

I agree, Nancy Grace does not know the meaning of fairness. In her eyes, if a person is charged, he or she is always guitly.

[@harpergrace5846]

Absolutely not he is guilty 🤦🏻‍♀️

[@xraeee]

His sis in law rides so hard for him more then his own blood family it’s weird. Scotts guilty af. There’s no such thing as coincidences & if there is, this case has WAAAAYYYY too many. He’s full of 💩. He’s where he belongs.

[@tonyallewellyn7304]

I completely agree 👌🏻

[@reneenayfabulous]

​@@tonyallewellyn7304 yep!

[@PlayaenDiaSoleado]

Unfortunately, only circumstancial evidence out there. Interesting to watch The Behavior Panel on SP, four of the best behavior analysts world-wide… I believe what Laci’s mom told SP is very likely to be true “Laci is dead because she loved you.” So sad… mother and baby murdered.

[@sophie8394]

There wasn't only circumstantial evidence.

[@jwait1496]

@Sophie. So what was the evidence that wasn't circumstantial? Lol

[@sophie8394]

@@jwait1496 The bodies of his wife and son washing up where he was fake fishing is physical evidence. Laci's hair clamped in a pair of pliers in the bottom of a boat she knew nothing about is physical evidence. The evidence that he made multiple anchors in his warehouse but only one was found in his boat with no rope attached is physical evidence. The gas soaked boat cover found stuffed in his shed with chunks of concrete rolled up in it is physical evidence. The searches done on the home computer for tides and currents in the SFB are physical evidence. The fetal biometry evidence is forensic evidence. The evidence of the movement of bodies in the bay is forensic evidence. The canine scent detection evidence is forensic evidence. Scott's blood on their comforter and in his truck from a cut on his hand that he gave multiple explanations for is forensic evidence. The recorded phone calls with Amber Frey are documentary evidence. A literal mountain of circumstantial evidence which is evidence btw. Just as powerful under the law as direct evidence. *for the "there's no evidence" crowd

[@jwait1496]

@@sophie8394 Petelikedporn Patty Sullivan Anne Sull Kim L Slick Pete -You ran around telling people hundreds of people that Jackie, ( his deceased mother ) was a "liar". You said she needed to fill out CTR form for the $10,000. Truth CTRs are filed when a customer makes a currency transaction EXCEEDING $10,000, or for multiple transactions if the sum exceeds $10,000 in one day. That would make you the liar.

[@sophie8394]

@@jwait1496 we all know who the liar is Kathryn 🤥

[@neilwani1178]

He just doesn't seem to be honest. Could he be a person that kills his wife and unborn baby to be with the cute girl. Absolutely.

[@angelacoffaro9114]

Why was his death sentence overturned? Y? He is not punished, because he is reading, eating, drinking watching tv excersing yard while Laci and conner are in dirt😢😢

[@MLSPlatforms]

I’m thinking it was the guys he was in Paris with on New Year’s Eve 😂

[@Eadrene]

lolol

[@reneenayfabnaynay5679]

You mean, Francios & Pasquale? No, they have declined any comments.

[@criticRN]

Lmao 🤣 the guy lied about everything

[@jwait1496]

@@criticRN About what? Tell me what he lied about that didn't have to do with the affair?

[@criticRN]

@@jwait1496 oh ffs 🤦🏽‍♀️ give it up already. He murdered her - by accident or with full intent.

[@tanyawood7156]

I'm not young I'm 48 years old and I know he didn't do it

[@sophie8394]

How do you know? Let me guess...you watched a documentary.

[@tanyawood7156]

@@sophie8394 he needs a new trial goes 12 juries were messed up they all messed up I studied this case for many years

[@sophie8394]

@@tanyawood7156 studied it? What were your sources?

[@jwait1496]

@@sophie8394 What are your sources, Reneenay FabNayNay? You parrot old media lies without fact checking. QUOTE " there's nothing I haven't reviewed. I've been reviewing it for more than 10 years. I'm not impressed by KZbin legal experts. And for the 2nd time. RN did NOT co auther a book. The fact you don't even know that tells me everything I need to know about your expertise. " FACT RN did co auther a book called 'we, the jury' QUOTE ("Are you aware the boat was never registered") FACT The boat WAS registered. The correct information including his name and address was filed with the DMV on 12-9-02. QUOTE ("Scott called Sharon and immediately said Laci is missing without asking if she had heard from her or seen her") FACT -DISTASO: And can you tell the jury, just tell us what happened. ROCHA: When he called he said, "Hi, Mom." He said, "Is Laci there with you or over there?" And I said, "No." And he said that her car is there, was there in the driveway and the dog was in the backward with the leash on and Laci was missing. I remember telling him to call her friends to see if anybody had seen or talked to her that day..... QUOTE ("Even though Ron already had a boat and a better one at that.... LOL") FACT Ron didn't have a boat. He had a float tube. QUOTE ("Laci's hair was was found wound tightly in some pliers on the boat") FACT Hair was not wrapped around the pliers, and it was never proven to be Laci's hair. HENDEE: No, it didn't wrap around the pliers, didn't wrap around the needle nose. It just went through. It looked like at one location it just went through the pliers. QUOTE ("Scott transferred the marina ticket to his clean pants") FACT EVERS: And he said, in fact, I have a parking receipt, would you like to see it? DISTASO: And what did you say? EVERS: I said yes. DISTASO: Okay. And did he go somewhere and get a parking receipt for you? EVERS: Yes, he did. DISTASO: Do you know where he went? EVERS: Yes, I do. DISTASO: Where was that? EVERS: He opened up the, he opened up the door to his truck, and reached in, and pulled a receipt from the ashtray. QUOTE ("Scott told Ron he was golfing") FACT Scott did NOT tell Ron he was golfing. He didn't talk to Ron until later and when he did, he said he was fishing. QUOTE ("Scott called Sharon and immediately said Laci is missing without asking if she had heard from her or seen her") FACT DISTASO: And can you tell the jury, just tell us what happened. ROCHA: When he called he said, "Hi, Mom." He said, "Is Laci there with you or over there?" And I said, "No." And he said that her car is there, was there in the driveway and the dog was in the backward with the leash on and Laci was missing. I remember telling him to call her friends to see if anybody had seen or talked to her that day..... QUOTE ("Robert Chacon was a lead detective who found evidence in the form of clay pots.") FACT Robert Chacon was not a lead detective, nor was there any evidence of clay pots ever entered as evidence. Robert Chacon was an FBI and no was not in charge of any if the bay searches either. QUOTE ("That's a bunch of BS. Full term healthy babies weigh between 6-9 lbs. Conner only weighed about three lbs.") FACT They measure bones to determine gestational age. They don't use weight of a decomposing fetus to determine age. 🤦‍♂️ QUOTE ("Vivian Mitchell couldn't have seen Laci because her husband Bill was home watching Football and ther was no football games that day.") FACT He said he had been searching on Christmas Eve for information or previews of bowl games to be played in the next few days. QUOTE ("Scott was researching paths of currents") FACT He was searching fishing game and boating regulations. Detective Wall clearly agreed on the stand he DID NOT search " currents" The website was "Department of Fish and Game" QUOTE (...you don't have an explanation for why SP refused to even speak to John Walsh...") FACT He did speak to John walsh. Get your facts straight, stalker! John Walsh: "I talked to Scott on the phone for about 45 minutes and his parents for about an hour," Walsh said in the lobby of the DoubleTree Hotel. "

[@jwait1496]

@@sophie8394 I'm guessing she knows much, much more than you.

[@C19hoax21]

After all I've heard and seen, my gut feeling is that Scott met and got to know one of the "Medina robbers" from along his fertilizer sales route, paid them to make Laci disappear, used the vacant Medina home and robbery, as crazy as this sounds, as a staging ground and alibi for their true intentions and offered an extra incentive for the hired thugs. Scott seemed way too confident to have actually done it but way too unsympathetic and over her before her body was even found to believe she was still alive. I'll bet it wouldn't take long to tie one of the robbers to a regular stop along Scott's sales route; a feed store, a service station, etc.

[@cristinalecompte5415]

yesss finally someone noticed it

[@sophie8394]

Lmfao 🤣🤣🤣

[@laneybobs8157]

...along his fertilzer sales route 😆 🤣 😂

[@criticRN]

Interesting 🤔

[@petelikedporn6009]

@@sophie8394😂😂😂😂😂

[@lutefisklimeade6278]

I think the prosecution failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt but I think he did it.

[@sophie8394]

They obviously did prove their case. He was found guilty.

[@broganlaux135]

@@sophie8394 I think he’s guilty but they didn’t really prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. He was convicted before he stepped in that court house

[@sophie8394]

@@broganlaux135 according to who? Janey Peterson? Scott's attorneys? There was no reasonable doubt for the jury who spent nearly 6 months of their lives seeing and hearing all of the evidence.

[@chubbybutterflies8971]

@@sophie8394 He was found guilty because the jury saw that everyone else already believed he was guilty. I personally don't think he did it, but even if he did, the prosecution left so much doubt. All the evidence was circumstantial, so they should've done a lot more to connect the circumstance to known facts.

[@sophie8394]

@@chubbybutterflies8971 wrong. He was found guilty bc the evidence proved he was guilty. Saying there was only circumstantial evidence proves that you don't know the facts of this case.

[@cass.707]

Plus there was like a bunch of people that said they saw a lacy walking the dog that morning

[@bobshilling8842]

hope you don't vote

[@sophie8394]

But like, they didn’t.

[@aok4418]

@sophie8394 Over a dozen very credible witnesses had seen Lacy and her dog. The MPD ignored them.

[@SUzzer-jy9lj]

Don't fall for this!!!! Sharon, I am truly sorry for this In-Justice

[@dyanshane]

Injustice is one word.

[@KM-ws4kf]

Hahahaha

[@jenbee1781]

He needs to tott in prison with Chris watts. Put them in the same cell.

[@JohnDgr81]

Yep, and they can exchange Theories and “compete” as to who is the bigger idiot!

[@SUzzer-jy9lj]

In the first interview when Scott referred to Laci in "past tense". WATCH IT!!!! He knew she was not coming home

[@williamadams9358]

Yeah, He really showed a consciousness of guilt with the past tense reference to Laci.

[@jenniferscott3176]

when was that years after they found her body amber fry didn't come out til after they found the body u know time line shows proof he was innocent. they can't go through it the evidence is completely different then they had date if death before reported missing she was actually held captive for 10 days before death Cops did there job she could have come home. how was the mother thinking premeditated based off what amber told her amber lied about alot he was using her for sex she got mad when she found out everything he told her was a lie, she had to know he was married because there was pictures of him with his wife online and everywhere she claimed she didn't know his wife was missing until they found the body how is that possible 😳 the entire world knew u don't notice he's on TV looking for his wife

[@jenniferscott3176]

I watched every part of the trail and was completely in disbelief what was happening at time what was thrown out the entire time it was crazy the amount of misjustice Nancy grace was a monster that completely broke the law the entire time a new trial they would lose the date of death in trail was December 24 she died on January 3rd she was held captive for 10 days while they were on him recording him media watching him chasing him 24/7 this is the most bias bullshit I've every seen u should be banned from the internet TV and everywhere u could possibly be which is why u say it because u want the haters to bash u to be relivent as u know it's the only thing u can do for viewership because ur so completely stupid I hope u both go to jail for the damage u have done in this situation alone open investigation and giving out information the entire time that's a crime u know miscarriage of justice if ever there was one like hey killer come here if u dump body where been searched for days we will believe u had nothing to do with it because we want Scott for this for being a cheater even though body dumped from land off bridge let's say it was his underweight raft of a boat that a single man couldn't carry a heavy 150 limp body let alone be able to handle throwing off a boat that would have sunk if u leaned at 5 degrees off balance so date of death differnt from trial premeditated no longer aloud alibi proof he wasnt the one who did that to her the police are his alibi they were recording him 24/7 as well as media hounds stalking him u provided the evidence that he didn't do it alone morons bias u are so bias its redicouls why didn't u mention the 6 dead pregnant women in the area at the time over this cheating guy who thought he was in the dog house by being caught and she took off he didn't know she was missing missing until her body showed up which then u showed him in a downward spiral dyed his hair his dad had to keep him from killing himself he attacked the camera men he was a mess after the news then amber started her whole parade of being mislead and that she was going to take him down saying crazy things on the recordings u all played every night on the news what she got for the day it was a circus not a justice system and the judge who would refuse his defense from having any info the prosecution lost evidence to hide it didn't add up seriously cops changed dates of robbery which wasn't allowed in court no real evidence was allowed like the neighbors who knew her who saw her after he left with supposed dead body dog was inside when he left found in neighborhood later when he was long gone 13 strangers who saw her walking dog that morning in a time pattern that proved he was on boat at time and then at side peice house screwing her when laci went to confront the robbers 2 men in white van and 3 people say they saw her with so men what she was wearing 1 with dog and one that said she was being taken and called 911 to report they saw what looked like a kidnapp but no officer came out to scene or did mote then take the call that was recorded and played on media Nancy grace said it was a lie Scott put out but when played it was a older women that later was on media saying what she saw happen but no one investigated old lady but media guy it's insane the whole thing total insane he's been in prison for 20 years, Micheal Patterson was only 12 years before released he was with wife durning death covered in blood had multiple motives lies hidden weapon but had less coverage then this which has no evidence at all that he did anything but cheat on his wife who was pregnant like 80% of men have done please this is all a plea for government media fed to change laws for what not sure but some real sick bs I'm sure

[@brennanhuff2960]

Oh good Lord, Sharon and Brent Rocha both referred to Laci in the past tense early on in the investigation.

[@arrivagabry]

that is the dumbest thing I ever heard, we all knew she wasn't coming back alive so that makes all of us her killer?

[@everettlafferty5654]

What evidence

[@sophie8394]

🤣🤣🤣

[@laneybobs8157]

😆 🤣 😂

[@steelhurricane4041]

This case is fishy. Scotts innocent.

[@mauiswift6391]

Nope!

[@vernaraney9870]

I watched the whole trial Guilty Guilty Guilty

[@tamaratragedy759]

How did you watch the trial when no cameras were allowed in?

[@vernaraney9870]

It was on court tv

[@tamaratragedy759]

@@vernaraney9870 his original trial??! i would like to see that. ive only ever heard no cameras were allowed in.

[@jwait1496]

Cameras were not allowed in the courtroom. You watched media outside the courthouse.

[@bethanyschofield2613]

"After 17 years behind bars could Scott Peterson actually be innocent?" No. Guilty as hell.

[@NoSpam1891]

Wrong. Here's why Scott Peterson is *NOT GUILTY.* *From the trial evidence:* _Scott purchased a boat launch ticket at 12:54pm when he arrived at the Berkeley Marina. Scott gave this receipt to the police the evening of Dec. 24th when they asked him if he had any proof he'd been at the marina._ _Scott estimated being at the bay for about 90 minutes. From the time Scott bought the ticket to when his cell phone records show him leaving the area is about 78 minutes._ If Laci's body went into the Bay during that 78 minutes, is there any way he could *NOT* be guilty? If Laci's body didn't go into the bay during that 78 minutes, is there any way that he *CAN* be guilty? So what evidence from the trial proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, that her body went into the bay in those 78 minutes? I can't find it. And neither can anyone else. *Scott Peterson is NOT GUILTY.*

[@sophie8394]

​@@NoSpam1891 blah blah blah copy and paste garbage from the appeal page blah blah blah

[@smithswoodrookie]

I actually think in point of fact he’s probably guilty but a better defence lawyer & an unbiased jury would have acquitted him there is reasonable doubt for me.

[@sophie8394]

I literally just laughed out loud 🤣

[@petelikedporn6009]

@@sophie8394😂😂😂. This is a hilarious video for comments. The dumbing down of America is proving strong.

[@FathomlessJoy]

It wasn't a close case in the media. Talking heads like you already convicted him before he was arrested. Remember? But so far as actual evidence, I am not sure if I have heard of a husband convicted of murdering his wife on less evidence.

[@ParDiss-e4i]

So horrible. Sorry to hear that. I understand.

[@lindacurtis3513]

So sad Laci's family can't live in peace with this continuing...Prayers for all of them..🙏🙏🙏

[@tonyallewellyn7304]

Amen 🙏🏻 💜

[@ompaloompa4970]

So sad for Laci peterson, baby, and family 🙏✝️🕊️

[@johndurrer7869]

Are you one of those people that call it a fetus when the mother kills it and a baby when the father does the same? Or are you consistent?

[@chubbybutterflies8971]

@@johndurrer7869 lol right! The baby was not born and they acknowledged its life back then but I really wonder if they would pull some feminist bs if this case happened today!

[@aok4418]

@@chubbybutterflies8971 They couldn't determine that.

[@thegabbiedoll]

@@johndurrer7869 kind of weird that your asking this question when all the commenter did was offer condolences for lacy and her unborn baby’s death… weird. But given that she was 8 months pregnant, I was born at 8 months so safe to say her “fetus” or “baby” whatever you want to call it, was fully developed at that point. But still, weird response to a person offer condolences for a persons death.

[@NoSpam1891]

@@thegabbiedoll All but one expert said this was a full term baby as found.

[@TheSzepu]

He is guilty as fck....who killed her than?

[@Emily_Gray73]

What actual evidence, apart from circumstantial, is there against Scott Peterson? At the very least, there is a lot of reasonable doubt in this case. He should not be in prison.

[@sophie8394]

There was physical, forensic, documentary and circumstantial evidence (which is evidence btw) presented in this case. There is no reasonable doubt.

[@Emily_Gray73]

@@sophie8394 I disagree. If this was re-tried, the conviction would easily be quashed with a strong legal team.

[@sophie8394]

@@Emily_Gray73 there was no reasonable doubt for the jury, the judge or the Supreme Court Justices who, after examining the evidence in this case on direct appeal in 2020, unanimously upheld his guilty conviction. His direct appeal was shot down, 18 of the 19 claims in the habeas petition were deemed moot or to have no merit and most recently his feeble attempt at a new trial claiming juror misconduct was turned down. What does it take before it sinks in? He's done.

[@aok4418]

@Sophie There was NO physical or forensic evidence. Stop making stuff up. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about.

[@aok4418]

@Emily Gray I agree. Even the circumstantial evidence was explained away. Sophie doesn't understand what physical evidence. She actually thinks the bodies turning up where they were found is physical evidence. 🤦‍♂️

[@steelhurricane4041]

He is innocent man. Shame on all of you.

[@amymeanor8879]

To start with period end of story hes is where he is supposed to be