After NZYQ - Community Safety Orders

  Рет қаралды 309

UNSW Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law

UNSW Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law

3 ай бұрын

NZYQ v Minister for Immigration (NZYQ) changed the landscape for immigration detainees in Australia. It led to the release of at least 149 people from indefinite immigration detention where there was no real prospect of removing them from Australia in the 'reasonably foreseeable future’. It also led to the rapid passage of new legislative provisions that could be used to restrict the freedom of those released. Under this legislation, the Commonwealth can seek Community Safety Orders if those released are considered to pose an ‘unacceptable risk of seriously harming the community by committing a serious violent or sexual offence’, allowing re-detention or the imposition of other restrictive conditions.
Continuing detention orders have been accepted by the High Court of Australia as valid for people convicted of serious violent, sex or terrorism crimes in Australia. Community Safety Orders, however, differ from continuing detention orders in important ways, and they have not yet been tested in Australian courts.
This fully subscribed event held on 3 April 2024, sought to examine Community Safety Orders in detail, explaining what they are and what you should do if the Commonwealth seeks to issue one to your client. It also sought to examine the broader ramifications of NZYQ, including the conditions that people are being released under.
Speakers included:
Scientia Professor George Williams, UNSW Law, leading Australian constitutional scholar, who can advise on the possible constitutional ramifications of NZYQ and follow up cases.
Paul Coady, NSW Public Defender, who has ample experience responding to continuing detention orders under state and territory legislation and can provide insight into how the existing system operates.
Sanmati Verma, Acting Legal Director at the Human Rights Law Centre, who represents a number of clients in immigration detention and, along with the Kaldor Centre, intervened as amicus curiae in NZYQ v the Minister for Immigration. Sanmati will explain how NZYQ has impacted on immigration detainees since it was determined and what the future might hold for them.
Chair: Anna Talbot, Affiliate and Strategic Litigation Network Coordinator, Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law

Пікірлер
NZYQ, Liberty and the Future of Indefinite Detention
51:36
Melbourne Law School
Рет қаралды 239
Global perspectives on resettlement and complementary pathways
1:23:53
UNSW Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law
Рет қаралды 451
НРАВИТСЯ ЭТОТ ФОРМАТ??
00:37
МЯТНАЯ ФАНТА
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
A teacher captured the cutest moment at the nursery #shorts
00:33
Fabiosa Stories
Рет қаралды 51 МЛН
What Broke The U.S. Immigration System?
12:22
CNBC
Рет қаралды 254 М.
NZYQ - Are the visa restrictions placed on released detainees valid?
17:53
Constitutional Clarion
Рет қаралды 464
More constitutional challenges to migration laws
11:41
Constitutional Clarion
Рет қаралды 508
Australia’s indefinite detention battle explained | ABC News
7:37
ABC News (Australia)
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Britain Detained - Immigration Detention in the UK
16:56
Real Media
Рет қаралды 30 М.
FULL: Kamala Harris speech at Atlanta rally | FOX 5 News
20:31
FOX 5 Atlanta
Рет қаралды 718 М.
The law that broke US immigration
5:40
Vox
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
What is the AI Management System Standard ISO/IEC 42001:2023?
1:00:35
CSIRO's Data61
Рет қаралды 3 М.
НРАВИТСЯ ЭТОТ ФОРМАТ??
00:37
МЯТНАЯ ФАНТА
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН