After QD-OLED is QD-Ultraviolet TV! Better than MicroLED because…

[@stopthefomo]

👍Whokeys Winter SALE 30% code: SF20 Windows11($21) www.whokeys.com/wk/sfw11 Windows10($16) www.whokeys.com/wk/sfwin10 Windows11 home($20) www.whokeys.com/wk/sf11h Windows10 Home ($14) www.whokeys.com/wk/sfwh Office2019 ($50) www.whokeys.com/wk/sfof19

[@verticalfracture5683]

"QD Ultra" or "Ultra QD" will definitely be where the branding people go with this tech

[@chrisbullock6477]

Hope you get around to talking about TCL mentioned using Ink Jet Printed screens for new Mini LED?

[@nestroit5010]

2025 models already look promising "less is more"(no need for MLA), I think I will buy this year to upgrade from a LG B7(2017, massive leap!)

[@GenX_in_the_wild]

One day they will make tvs that give you a tan 😅

[@stopthefomo]

THIS will do it

[@TheDane422]

haha i can see happening that in the near future😂

[@ericswanson9773]

😂

[@humanbass]

And skin cancer

[@marqgb]

Serve you a meal and do the dishes!

[@George_Taylor_]

Thank God I have another new technology that will never reach consumers to get excited about.

[@p3x416]

Reminds me of Canon's SED Surface-conduction Electron-emitter Display

[@SomeUserNameBlahBlah]

Technology still needs to be economically feasible. No one is going to pay $20k for a 65" TV.

[@randomchannel323]

Finally a tv only billionaires could afford

[@dcaseng]

I would brand it "QD-ULTRA" instead, a shorter and more simple name is always the best way to go when it comes to marketing.

[@Xrpxlm7]

Yes because people will question UV. They’ll think they will get cancer

[@scofozo]

QD-UV rolls off the tongue

[@toastyboy]

and making ultra implies it's the highest tier, which IMO is not. I think they should save it for the QD electroluminescent tvs. I know they already have names for it but it deserves to be the final tier of display tech.

[@swifty1969]

how about QD-UV

[@Emptrix]

Isn't UV dangerous and harmful to the eyes? Taken from multiple searches: UV light can damage the lens, cornea, retina, and other parts of the eye. This can lead to cataracts, macular degeneration, and other chronic conditions that can cause decreased vision. UV exposure can increase the risk of developing eyelid cancers, such as basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. The health conscious may be hesitant to grab one of these UV TVs, until some health/eye organization checks it thoroughly and certifies it safe for the eyes.

[@ionlywatch]

Firstly, this is not a TV, this is mainly for small-scale displays, smart watches and smartphones. Secondly, that's not how Quantum Dots work. The UV LED is a light source of the panel, not a UV lamp you can buy somewhere. The health effects you've mentioned doesn't really apply. Simply put, it would be a waste of energy if they just make a TV that lets out UV light that nobody could see.

[@Emptrix]

@@ionlywatch Don't misunderstand, I'm fully aware the demo shown isn't a TV as it was shown in this video itself. What FOMO is saying is that this tech could be used by TVs in a couple of year's time. That's what I'm getting at.

[@kougamecs3876]

I mean plasma tvs used ultraviolet to red green and blue conversation and people were fine

[@GoldenSW]

Yes, afaik all UV is bad one way or another. I suspect they would have to create a system that allows no leakage otherwise I doubt they would be permitted to sell it.

[@joshieecs]

the uv light is only used to energize the quantum dots, none of it would be emitted from the display

[@Soloist1983]

Love the idea, it's basically like what a CRT used to do, using a highly energetic electron beam to energize the phosphors, scintillation basically. Using UV as the source and letting the QD layer handle the color conversion is analogous to a CRT phosphor layer. I think it's a great idea.

[@Kosmophilos]

Plasmas literally used UV light.

[@Gatitasecsii]

Nope it's not a great idea and sounds extremely wasteful. Oled or MicroLED are the future.

[@kougamecs3876]

​@@Gatitasecsiimicroled is expensive.

[@Gatitasecsii]

@@kougamecs3876 For now, hence why I said they're "the future".

[@janedoe4141]

@@Gatitasecsii oleds have no future, they die much like the phosphor coating did on a crt, except faster.

[@BRIANSTECHTHERAPY]

Well done! That nano suite was definitely eye opening!

[@pocangel]

you really think this will be better than qd oled?

[@Jimdish2555]

The Hisense 116 was the most interesting tech advance I've seen from that show.They're literally doing less QD-Oled this year.

[@ericswanson9773]

Tv for the 1%. Micro leds will lead sales of 55 to 65 inches. Getting bigger just is silly in most households.

[@Youbll75]

@@ericswanson9773you most be living in a box I’ve got a 77 inch G4 in my bedroom

[@MW-ii5nb]

The Samsung rgb micro led back light TV has more potential. In essence the same thing but 40k zones or maybe less in the hisense but 300k to something like 2 million zones possibility in the Samsung.

[@robzilla69]

I use standard UV leds for my aquarium. They create more heat and have a shorter lifespan than other leds.

[@wisitech4310]

​@@MW-ii5nbis but I thinks it's still gonna be expensive as F

[@Ascerian]

was not expecting this video to be this informative. Well done 👏

[@robertlawrence9000]

With UV, a scene with the sun you would be able to feel it. All we need next is Smell-O-Vision. 😎🤓

[@ericswanson9773]

Simpsons had that already😂

[@TheGabrielSevero123]

Dolby Smell 😂

[@mnomadvfx]

Doesn't work that way. If you look at the diagram of the panel you will notice that it says "UV filter". It uses the UV light to excite the QD's, and then absorbs any stray UV that passes the QD layer. Thus zero to negligible UV reaches the viewer.

[@444chroma]

FOMO please ask Samsung what kind of sorcery was used for the Q90R antireflection coating. Yeah I know it's old by today's standards, but every time I see it at my parents It looks perfectly glossy but still eats ambient light like a blackhole.

[@ionlywatch]

@@444chroma You mean it looks better than today's coatings?

[@444chroma]

@@ionlywatch it appears that way to me, yes. blacks looks inky and image is still crisp and clear. it seems to scatter a heavy glare but the panel is so bright you really don't notice that. It didn't negatively impact viewing angles either really, pretty much on par with Bravia 9. But the reflection handling is superior.

[@chrisbradley3224]

Yes, the semi-gloss coating on the old KS series was better looking also but that's because it allows sharper reflections and diffuses less.

[@D8099.]

Of all the TV KZbinrs I learn the most from you. That knowledge inspires me to buy. I LOVE all the nerdy details. I just love learning. I’m actually learning physics watching this channel and it’s awesome.

[@Edward135i]

I used to be a TIG welder, i'd put sunscreen on my face and put long sleeves on before going to work even in the middle of summer. The UV light was so strong it would turn a black sweatshirt pink in a few weeks, I'll be very curious as to how they'll block out this light.

[@SomeUserNameBlahBlah]

The amount of UV this TV is producing is small compared to a welder. Most of the UV light will be converted to non-UV before it leaves the TV through the quantum dots. Only a small amount of UV will leak through, which can easily be reduced through a filter on the screen.

[@googIesux]

Plus, for those who are super worried; look up uv + hormones. Sunlight has UV, and all of the hand-wringing aside, we actually need UV from sunlight. Cancers seem to be a nutrition/immune issue. People getting more sun are actually less sick, and they're getting exponentially greater doses than what this TV w/ filter would leak.

[@buschg7106]

I'm using my S95B since launch, and it's amazing. Looking forward to upgrading to the F this year.

[@KingOfNaraka]

UV TV commercial: viewing experience so real and immersive you will need SPF 2000-rated sunscreen to watch our TV. A doctor's visit for skin cancer check-up is recommended after each viewing. 😅

[@aquaneon8012]

QD-Ultraviolet should help with reducing costs, but I would still expect it to be expensive since it is still a microled tv.

[@stopthefomo]

Biggest expense of microLED is the repair/yield/waste from dead pixels not to mention the complication of placement and this method addresses that issue!

[@ericswanson9773]

​​@@stopthefomoif not under warranty most people junk them? On average people keep there tvs for 5 year.

[@Xrpxlm7]

Idk if people will want an UV tv. Can you imagine the people who find out it’s made by UV. Health scare galore

[@haukikannel]

@@ericswanson9773I keep my TV about 20 years! Why would I replace it? Unless itnis oled that gets super did after 5 years?

[@ricarmig]

@@ericswanson9773only if it’s in your country, in mine (south Europe) people expect 10 years minimum, with the exception of tech geeks who every 3 years “need” the latest and greatest

[@shaylennaidoo]

Let’s change the name of your channel to Start the FOMO!!! 😂

[@DHMaudioandvideo]

Can't wait to get our hands on them in a couple months!! To hit it with some content!

[@FrowningTaco]

Sounds to me like, instead of using UV Micro-led, Samsung Display could just upgrade their oled production machinery from vapor deposition to the new photolithographic ones from Applied Materials. This is the same tech Japan Display plan to use with eLEAP. This would increase the pixel aperature ratio of oled from ~30% currently to 60%. This would enable either a 5X longevity increase(eliminate burn in) at current brightness or a 3X brightness increase at current oled lifetime(still has burn in risk). If Samsung Display use these new machines, combined with removing the scattering layer for the blue oled and uses blue Quantum Dots instead, I think it makes Micro-led redundant.

[@Rubed0_o]

QD-EL is the next big step, they just have to address issues with the blue. Using UV is a health hazard.

[@AmigoAmigo-w5p]

So our TVs in the future will literally have the SUN ☀️ as the backlight 😅 shining Ultra Violet light. You will be able to tan in front of your tv haha. 😂

[@Alster763]

Seeing these kind of road maps is so great, I am super excited to see these next generations of Displays and TV's coming out in the next few years I have been holding out on a new display because there frankly isn't one good enough for me, I think a UV Micro Led 6K might be the ticket for me.

[@klaymatic3751]

Do you mean you have a dope TV and new ones are not worth the upgrade or that no current TV is straight up good enough for you?

[@Alster763]

@@klaymatic3751 I think my TV is pretty decent I have a Samsung S95B, it does a pretty good job. I am in the market for a workstation display that is better than what Apple offers for $5000. I want pin sharp text for productivity i.e 6K on a 32" screen, pure blacks like OLED for gaming with a high refresh rate 165hz and up it seems like this new UV Micro Led might be the ticket. I am okay with waiting 3 to 5 years.

[@haukikannel]

So first products out 2030?

[@Alster763]

@@haukikannel That sounds about right.

[@brucethen]

The last time there was a product called Ultra violet, Disney destroyed it.

[@advil000]

As long as the TVs have a proper filter layer there's no real problem. Anyone old enough to have had a CRT TV or monitor may remember that even though the screens were "filtered" it was not recommended to sit extremely close to the screen for long periods of time. I'm not sure how this tech would help alleviate burn in though.

[@alejandroalartiz9451]

QD-UV-TV? Catchy! 🥴

[@uncledd1067]

We’ll call it UVTV. 🙌🏾

[@Kosmophilos]

It was called plasma.

[@bungalowtomcat1]

Will it be the cost of what OLEDs are now , when it does come out eventually 🤔

[@Immudzen]

I just got the S90D and Q990D to go with it. It is going to be a while before I am in the market for a TV again.

[@AP-hn8wd]

It’s nice knowing about the new model TVs and upcoming ones but it’s always best to get the previous year’s model TVs to get the best value. Especially if you’re coming from a TV that’s 5yrs old or more. Any TV you get that’s even 3 years newer is already a huge upgrade. Especially models that came out in the last couple of years. In 2024 some of the best deals were 2023 models. - 65” Samsung S90C for $999 - 65” LG G3 for $999 - 77” LG C3 for $1499 These were close to 50% off their original MSRP (more or less) and the newer models are only better by a small amount.

[@jaefrmbk2k]

awesome sounding breakthrough🎉& of course you are right@the cusp 🏆

[@Scottyman99]

Good stuff. You didn't mention contrast. How does this compare to OLED black levels? I'm still rocking an LG B6 that's at least 10 years old. KZbin symbol is burned in. Do the newer models give you the option of moving or removing certain symbols that will burn in eventually?

[@marksalamon619]

A TV panel incorporating this new display technology with red, green, and blue quantum dots ought to have near-perfect color purity and accuracy in addition to all the other improvements you outline in this video. I'm just hoping I live long enough to see a TV of this type introduced in a 55"-65" size I can actually fit into my room...

[@thetrumanshow4791]

I would call it QD-UV. That said, it's hard to get excited about a new technology when we cant even get existing QD technology at the 83" size. Seems like a "no brainer" to me. Come on Samsung, wake up and smell the coffee!

[@Lunacy_Phoenix]

Does this come with the same or better panel response time as QD/OLED? If not don't care DOA.

[@alexfleener]

Ultraviolet TVs. Can’t wait, now you can get a sun tan while watching TV. Brian will love it.

[@Swecan76]

It seems great. But can imagine it would cost billions to build a factory and really start to mass produce it and go from proof of concept to 'reality'/'practical' application. But if viable from as small as smart watch to phone screens, tablets, monitors and TVs. It could be a giant market to be the number 1 supplier of said tech. It's not just selling TVs. Every year billions of smart phones are made or at least hundreds of millions. Imagine that.

[@RafaelMll]

Will tv's ever fix the motion issue for movie watching? I'm not a fan of sample and hold.

[@Kosmophilos]

This.

[@jasonhurdlow6607]

So how would you "fix" it, assuming it's actually broken?

[@maleckennedy5661]

Higher fps?

[@plasmatvforgaming9648]

Sounds amazing!

[@Saleh_kaz]

New video? QD ULTRA VIOLET🗣️🔥

[@Aquaman-01]

I dont understand why im getting eye strain with the samsung s90d. Its my second oled coming from a oled c8 ive owned for ag least 6 year's. Also i want to love the picture quality of the samsung oled but it is just soo punchy, ive turned off contrast enhancer, lower brightness a bit but when i compare both tvs the subtleness natural look of the c8 oled feels much easier on my eyes. The colors on samsung oled are amazing! but sometimes it seems like the picture is a bit blown out and overemphasized compared to the lg oled , I also use the warmest filter on both for preference to avoid too much blue light. Do u think a proper calibration could fix this, i still do want to keep the s90d as it seems like its the best tv on the market, particularly for games which is very important to me. Is the new s90 have any noticeable improvements? How does the lg c series stack up compared to it. I dont want the g series or top samung oled series because I think there just too bright for my liking.

[@lewisevander]

Turn off color booster if its on and increase the shadow detail black level, that will wash out the colors making it look completely natural. Also change color space to auto and the gamma to 2.2. Reduce the color to 15.

[@Aquaman-01]

@lewisevander ill give it a shot

[@Accuaro]

If you ever get a chance to talk to him again can you ask if we will get a DP 2.1 port on these TVs? With ever increasing refresh rates that consoles can't reach, or LG putting Gsync certification on TVs they're explicitly targeting PC gaming. EDIT: people over samsung ofc XD but also, the tech advancement is awesome to see!

[@vethum]

Sounds great. Hopefully it’s my next TV

[@carlosr.2027]

Blue phosphorous pholed or pho-Oled could be most logical choice may run cooler and more efficient my plasma tv during summer generates heat becomes unwatchable during winter use as a heater while watching TV so I guess what’s old is new again?

[@murraysmith-x9s]

the next one is QD- plutonium TV, 1million nits, its an amazing picture.....im still using a panasonic 60ST60 plasma, 150nits and its still awesomme....

[@BonafideJas]

I'm trying to figure out which high school gym he's been shooting these videos in. Looks like he's under the seats

[@-ak-634]

QD UV TV... Phew that's a mouthful. On other hand, my main concern is the UV aspects. Firstly, can the TV be made safe for everyday uses at its full power / brightness without having harmful effects on our skins? Secondly, how would the filter layer affects image quality, if at all? Everything about QD UV TV sounds very promising, though I'm have to wait and see if it is something worth pursuing and purchasing in the future.

[@Altoid777]

Question: Do the full array leds bulbs last longer and generate less heat than microleds?

[@boomerscs9193]

Any idea if this assures picture uniformity? I'm keeping my S95B until there's a qd with perfect uniformity. I won't go back to LCD.

[@Kevin_OU_007]

Great video FOMO!!

[@JohnMNeil]

7:04 The Nanosys presentation slide at this time code lists the color gamut for the Full Color Conversion option as only “Medium” (compared to “High” for the No Color Conversion option). Isn’t that an issue for decent TVs that want a large color gamut?

[@royceratliff7220]

When will the new technology from Hisense be affordable to the regular folks

[@Outkaz745]

On paper it's huge, we'll wait to see the tests, and wait for models in sizes and prices close to Woled and QD OLED

[@NGBRADLEY1991]

Is this the same tech as QDEL?

[@abg360ss]

No

[@efx245precor3]

I love this interesting channel. I might need my Sun screen for this UV TV

[@WilliamSmith-hf8um]

FOMO this is amazing, why aren't more people talking about this?

[@Mike-jm5wt]

I read through a quantum dot paper in the nature journal today and qd led/lcd still has a lot of potential improvement, there are dozens of ways to make them brighter, more colorful, more efficient, and best of all more native contrast ratio. As for this new technology, I'd call it QD Ultra.

[@BlueDrew10]

The problem is that LCD TVs are becoming increasingly complex trying to keep up with OLEDs (not unlike the ICEV vs EV race in automotives). And even with all that complexity, there's no getting past the inherent response time discrepancy.

[@Miguel-l1f]

How 'bout UVQD...say it fast you-vee-cue-dee

[@Mike-jm5wt]

@@BlueDrew10 from the paper it sounded to me like the QD color conversion layer actually simplified construction and lowered the cost, but the full array local dimming is definitely bumping up the price. However despite all that at large sizes QD LED has the cost advantage unless OLED mother glass becomes much bigger (I think that's how it works)

[@jankilly3516]

Pretty cool. Primer -> Colors can be individually generated (RGB sourceS) or into transformed colors (color filter or QD).from generic source (white/blue/etc.) Former is 100% microLEDs but are semiconductor devices ($$$) while OLED "can be" cheap inkjet printing process (see TCL's new PC monitors). OLEDs' bane is their color efficiency - some color OLEDs are not as bright as other colors, hence adding QD's which are >95% efficient from hi-eff source. And hi-eff blue OLED is fragile. UV OLED would offer much more energy (brighter) and if redundant, reduce burn in (similar to WOLED approach). Theoretically sounds great, but staring at UV source .... serious safety hurdle to surmount. Another upcoming tech is QD-electron where there is no light source, just electron injection into QD with colors coming out ... (almost same tech as microLED) perhaps next 5 yrs?

[@carlosr.2027]

Did they implemented the polarizer layer and the Blue phosphorous pholed and new chip to compete with Sony X1 ?

[@hamedhosseinzade2825]

isn't it the same as Sharp QDEL technology? 🤔

[@LiveeyePhoto]

I am blown away by the AWALL tv that you expand the size of. All the big brands will have to adopt this brand of tech. You start off with a 75 inch and you just add panels to make it an 85 or 105 or 165.

[@ericswanson9773]

Starting off at 75 inch is asking for failure. Most common size in household is 55 to 65 inches.

[@ricarmig]

@@ericswanson9773in Europe maybe, most households are rather small, but not in the USA or China in the next few years 😊 I have an apartment in Europe, a 55” TV and the next one will be either 65” or 75”. But I want panels to get better/brighter and more durable.

[@haukikannel]

@@ericswanson9773same problem as with all led tvs… the smaller TV the worse the halo effect is because it has limited amounth of areas that can be lit and turned of. Bigger TV can have more separate areas that you can control…

[@ilbro7874]

I want a tv that projects the image into my mind. Nearly 0 latency the way i figure.

[@RR-zz2ml]

Hi Stop The FOMO, what do you think about perovskites?

[@emotional-robot-dynamics]

Yeah it will be 🌠'QD - Ultra-V' 🌠 >> as that shortens the moniker / sounds catchy / denotes the technology implemented... as a brand I would prefer LG to take the lead manufacturing this technology ->> the S90D is amazing - however, Samsung have already nerfed it with crappy updates so don't deserve any buyer loyalty... great information perfect 👌💯👀📺🎯😎🌟

[@charliewright1009]

But if they are using full RGB quantum dot colour conversion then how will that work because the blue quantum dot has a very short life so could someone explain?

[@Paul-Fredrick]

Looks like it could be the answer to our prayers 🙏 BUT we may have to wait many more years before it becomes a reality 😢

[@michael-4k4000]

Whats after QD ultra Violet Elte pro? What happened tp PHOLED? Think thats what it was called....

[@kellymoses8566]

rgb micro led back light have huge potential

[@marshalltito]

4:26 The "scatter plate" is both absorbing and reflecting light. The reflections are what cause the raised blacks

[@Xrpxlm7]

Yeah I’m not a fan of QD oled I’d rather get deep blacks with an oled from LG than get a brighter screen with rasied blacks

[@marshalltito]

@Xrpxlm7 I'd rather a qd-oled in a dark room

[@ameserich]

But its magenta... meaning some little red light still passes thru the red color filter and exite the red I dont think this will fix it, it just fixes one problem which is the scatter plate. They might just develop a coating that reflects/reduce the red that goes thru the filter or put a matte coating like samsung did, i think this is the reason samsung goes all in on matte.

[@lewisevander]

​@@marshalltitoblacks also get raised in a dark room by the tvs own light when it's bright. Plasmatvforgaming made a video on it.

[@marshalltito]

@lewisevander I have never noticed that while watching content on an A95L in a dark room with uncovered white walls around 60% of the room. What did bother me was the menu structure and poor upscaling on an S95B

[@MrMackievelli]

How is this, manufacturing wise, any different from using blue microled? It seems to me it would have the same manufacturing limitations of any microled.

[@haukikannel]

It has… but instead of Blues led and two dots… it will have ultaraviolet led and tree quantum dots. So it does fix one problem. Not the size problem of leds. That is why this is good for big 100”+ TVs… and less good in small tvs. And quite bad in monitors… well not worse than any other led monitor though.

[@Xrpxlm7]

I don’t care how nice QD OLED has become, matte finish is a deal breaker. I refuse to believe people like matte finish. It’s horrible

[@Linnjazzy-93]

I love it

[@trewright1482]

I love it as well

[@truthx7]

It's pure garbage

[@Linnjazzy-93]

@@truthx7 love it

[@trewright1482]

@@truthx7 LG cope is real…

[@bloomerb4162]

UV isn't visible to us, so perfect blacks.

[@s9209122222]

Finally! Long lifespan, low latency, low response time, super high refresh rate, easier to produce(cheaper).

[@WhiskeyJames151]

Exciting!

[@we8463]

This is your best video to date! Thank you UV light cool we can all have skin cancer and be tanning in front of our TV!

[@coin777]

10:00 You know what's a good UV filter? Glass. Such a drawback

[@derbybOyzZ]

Unless you want to wait until you're 100 for the ultimate display, we need to have a complete rethink of how we design displays instead of this iterative improvement. bt.2020 is only 75% of the human colour vision, we need to be able to display 100% of the CIE 1931 colour space (so we need better than RBG), have huge brightness and no motion blur.

[@joes3800]

Sooo... what are the safety precautions to make sure no UV radiation can emit from the display and into the room? And how robust is it; does it degrade over time, and/or can it be damaged so that UV radiation leaks out?

[@stopthefomo]

All good questions

[@ShuFromChina-SYE]

So QD-OLED got dethroned even before it can produce a screen larger than 77"?

[@trewright1482]

WOLED was dethroned a feed years back by QD

[@haukikannel]

QD-oled is better is small size TVs and monitors. This is better in really big tvs. Because you still can not put on of individually pizels. This is led TV with led TV problems. Hopefully this is Little bit smaller than current leds, but still there will be halo effect. This is not oled! In both good… and bad.

[@FormzSYSTEM411]

Yes quality definitely matters, but not until quantity at the current quality is available. Just took a huge rollercoaster ride yesterday when finding some CES reviews on MICRO LED. I didn't realize pixel density varied so much. 98" 8K is .01 pixel pitch. I watched a video of .08 pitch Micro LED at 220" looking good. But I just seen a review of Hisense Micro LED saying it's .078 pitch which is 1.2 pitch smaller that AWOL Micro LED .09 that's twice as expensive as their 1.2 pitch option. So, Hisense hasn't released pricing yet, but looking like it's going to be double the price of AWOL's 162in at $50K. I was excited for that price until finding it's a waste of money if it's that much larger pixel pitch. Just waiting for the day to own the transportation device to bring me into the scene with high enough detail for a real feel atmosphere. I thought this was the year, but $100k is double my price range. Unfortunately looks like still be waiting awhile before there's anymore exciting news at all.

[@tails21c]

Its the new plasma tv 😂

[@haukikannel]

So it depends how many UV leds they can put under the quantum dots. Aka how many areas they can put there. Aka how big areas they can put on and of under the quantum dots. 1000 areas? 2000 areas? 4000 areas? So how much, how Little halo there will be…

[@macgyvermac2344]

I'm still here fomo, I like that is it cheap that will be the make or break of it

[@georgeogrady449]

What you think off AI build in to tv

[@JohnWilliams-gy5yc]

Sony is right all along. OLED days are numbered indeed. I wonder whether we will ever see S95i.

[@cemtamada4902]

Böyle giderse televizyonlar gözlerimizin içine kadar girecek. Makrodan mikroya 😅

[@NickMartelli]

Nano led is still better, correct?

[@stopthefomo]

"nanoLED" from QD is harder and farther away due to unstable QD-blue self emissive technology so not necessarily.

[@bardhi09]

My holy grail is Porotech's DynamicPixelTuning MicroLED tech Would eliminate RGB subpixels entirely and emit direct color light

[@webx135]

I think "QDUV" and the logo is a dove with the letter Q on its wing.

[@AndrewJohnWard]

What about organic QLED

[@elysiumcore]

Would LG be able to use this tech ? Since this is not coming from Samsung 👀

[@mr.osadciw-classroomaccoun657]

UVQD or UVTV. Keep it simple. Both have a marketing ring to it. My preference is UVQD over UVTV since we're not actually viewing UV light; UV light has short wavelengths and strong photon energy, under about 380nm. This is outside of our vision, too strong, and will damage our eyes without that filter. So UVQD is the better choice as it factors in the filter and QD layer. Claimed :)

[@Kosmophilos]

Plasmas already had UV light.

[@biketech60]

Panasonic ! Something to replace my beloved Plasma TV , still going strong since 2011 .

[@misterlexx2721]

What the Fomo you're talking about?!😅😅😅 I saw you at CES 2025 hanging out with your colleagues Caleb and Tech Steve.

[@carlcat]

There was a time, not too long ago, when you bought a TV and you were good to go for 5 years or so. Not so much now, present technology is advancing and new technology is coming out all the time. Bought the Sony 77" A95L over a year ago and I'm guessing in a year or two TV's will be much better, brighter and more colorful with more features. TV's are getting like computers in as soon as you buy one it's outdated in no time. I'm not complaining, it's exciting albeit expensive.

[@stopthefomo]

here's the good news: Netflix would literally look the same among all TVs between now and 2030 because they grade it to look good on even cheap TVs (peak brightness less than 400 nits LOL)

[@ztuber7763]

@@stopthefomo Does that apply to disc media too? I don't stream anything; all discs here.

[@444chroma]

Correct, it's so difficult to hold on to bragging rights lately, but at the end of the day when we watch our Columbo episodes they look beautiful.

[@ErnestoAdventista]

Buy the tv for the picture, the features you get from other sources. Picture quality doesn't evolve as fast as the companies want you to think. They are always bringing something to make you think your tv is outdated, when it's not the case (brightness, resolution, new color names, blablabla) in reality most of these are gimmicks and some provide little improvements. I'll take a 111FD from 2008 any day against most of today's televisions.

[@jkairi4]

A year or two, the LG G5 for 2025 will be much brighter than the A95L.

[@GabrielPassarelliG]

I hope LG buys it. LG is a better TV overall, but Samsung have QD-OLED, and is ahead in the Picture Quality department. All ultraviolet backlight can also be used with QD subpixels to lower the cost for entry level TVs. And then mid tier could have MiniLED local dimming capabilities, followed by MicroLED performance in high tier TVs, achieving Perfect Black and Contrast without blooming and with much higher brightness. If those QD subpixels can really convert 100% of the UV wavelength to the visible spectrum, then it wouldn't be harmful to our yes or skin.

[@hyper-potato]

QD-UV

[@DileepaRanawake]

Maybe full QD tv - not great public relationship with UV

[@maninthemiddleground2316]

12:10 My bet is “Ultra OLED” ☺️

[@PlayNeth]

Can we ever go back to a technology that "paints" the screen instead of having a grid of pixels? I hate upscaling and wish we could go back to a display that "syncs" to a desired resolution and let you trade off refresh rate for resolution or the other way around like CRTs.

[@blankman9600]

I think OLED is fine and the burn in I see none on any of my OLED device. My C8 (7 years old) has Zero burn in. I think the panels will outlast the other components of the tv. At that point your most likely going to replace the whole tv. I used to worry about OLED burn in before I bought my TV but they do a good job of controlling it.

[@GenX_in_the_wild]

This is rocket science 😮