Guess we could expect napalm ghosts - I mean, if anyone would ignore the Geneva convention makes sense it would be Nagash.
@alexinfinite71428 ай бұрын
😂
@gnomehunter69698 ай бұрын
good vid getting me hyped for 4th edition
@Averagejoepainting8 ай бұрын
So which procession do you think pyreghiests fit lore wise the most? I’m thinking emerald host.
@2Tough8 ай бұрын
I mean every procession would have them, i cant think of one that embodies fire more than others... Emerald host is a good call out though, I feel like you'd need direct orders from Olynder to corral several packs of these dudes
@ce48798 ай бұрын
Ah, early for both good lore and the bots to flood the comments. Begone automatons, Nagash has no need of the soulless and witless! Burn! 🔥
@ce48798 ай бұрын
Okay listened to it. Great stuff! The ghost Fire beacons are such a cool idea to defend the Underworlds! Bleed an approaching foe dry over the miles and then turn their own dead against them! The Napoleon vs Russia scorched earth comparison is apt, that’s the vibe I get from NightHaunt on the whole is supernatural conscripts pulled up from the afterlife and thrown in mass at the enemy, either for defense of swarming offense where when they overwhelm enemies with numbers & fear they permanently haunt the ruins which gives incorporeal beings all the advantages and invaders trying to reclaim their fortress no protection. And of course the twisted mirror of church deacons is great and deliciously Nagash. Go to Gnarlwoods for trapped magic, artifacts & a crashed spaceship? Nah, just sending fire ghosts of priestly candle lighters & screaming burning grave-robbers to make a fire cyclone and burn it all for maximum death to feed me. 👻 🔥
@jonathanwatson44848 ай бұрын
When i first seen the pyregheist, i always thought they have something to do with the nighthuant soullanterns... guess i was close
@republicrising21288 ай бұрын
Im just getting into age of sigmar after couple years in 40k would love for you to do a video with best books on age of sigmar
@johnevans57068 ай бұрын
I'm not that keen on the models if I'm honest, but the lore, oh, the lore is so good.
@40KWill8 ай бұрын
Good to see they might continue to support Warcry?
@ce48798 ай бұрын
Of course they will.it’s lauded as one of GW’s best modern games and reports say it’s far surpassed their initial expectations for it. That’s why they’re pumping out so many warbands, terrain and white dwarf scenarios & forces for it all the time.
@minacapella83198 ай бұрын
These guys are awesome but I'm afraid to buy them. I had just finished getting all my units for a ravagers list, when they made the announcement that literally all the s2d cultists were going in the trash for 4th. I have multiple copies of some of them for this specific list and I was looking forward to giving it a try, as well as seeing how well it may translate into 4th. But it's not translating almost at all.. hundreds of dollars down the drain when I don't have a lot of spending money. Buying more warcry specific units for the sake of adding them to my existing armies feels like a massive gamble now.
@Jafr08 ай бұрын
I totally get your worry, losing those s2d cultists is such a weird move but I'm hoping that was specific to s2d as they still allow all the other warcry/underworlds in the main game
@d-emprahexpects8 ай бұрын
That sucks, a lot. However, remember this: the game is just an excuse to collect. Play the game you want. Use the minis you _love._ Use those awesome models to represent something else or use them as they are and play 3rd edition with your friends, put them on square bases and use them in Old World. It is *your* collection, *your* armies, and *your* choice of models. Don't get discouraged, ever 😁🙂
@40KWill8 ай бұрын
Only buy if you want them for Warcry.
@minacapella83198 ай бұрын
@@d-emprahexpects can't play the game I want if everyone else is wanting to play something different.
@d-emprahexpects8 ай бұрын
@@minacapella8319 show them how to play your games and why it's the best. Enthusiasm is contagious 💪💪💪💪💪💪