Ahimsa and the Harappans | Eshan Sharma in conversation with Devdutt Pattanaik

[@SerenityAZ]

Very Informative….Jains always believed that initial evidences are obtained during Harappa civilization. We should investigate further…Thanks for putting this thought that people should thibk from all dimensions.

[@anetavaid5485]

Deodat is a intelligent person. Very informative. Thank you.

[@MohdSayeed-hb6lu]

Very knowledgeable session.. It was very informative.. Thanks a lot to speaker n organizer ❤❤❤❤

[@paulomi9351]

Kaalkacharya was jain monk who travelled outside India Charan munis capable of akashgochari vidhya too travelled outside india Not only that, Indian kings like haryanka Dynasty king shreniks son abhay kumar was friend with son of Babylonian king nebuchandezzars son who took Jain diksha. Nebuchandezzar contributed to jinnordhar of girnar teerth Probably devdutt ji does not know ancestry and history of Jainism which is very ancient and widespread

[@ksub5157]

Please enlighten us. Eager to learn more about your scholarship.

[@paulomi9351]

@ksub5157 yeah Jains are Arya of their Arya khund and bharatkshetra karmabhoomi ( 1 Arya khund and 5 malech khund) in vast jambudweep, innermost dweep of madhyalok or middle realm of universe whose centre is mount meru or sumeru

[@paulomi9351]

@@ksub5157 even today jains make swastik gahuli patterns in jinalaya or derasar or chaityalay or devalaya during chaitya vandan Pooja Swastik, aum and crescent 🌙 moon sign with dot or star representing liberated soul or siddha atma or param Atman has deep associated meaning in Jainism Crescent moon sign with dot or star also seen in ancient Sumerian and Mesopotamia civilization and tamgha sign of mongol before their conversion to Islam It's jina tatva or shiv tatva or sohum or tatva massi concept kzbin.info/www/bejne/fZbdYmaKfcaqZ68si=vgx6nbBHHjGMsdjc

[@swadhinsennemo]

He seems to know everything about everything...history, archaeology, philosophy. However, he has very little or no idea about the concepts and methods of archaeology. Someone as popular like him must refrain himself from representing all knowing individual. It's perhaps good for presentist need and his popularity. He also misrepresented Wingrow-Graebers idea as well as Upinder's arguments. He has talked selectively about some artefacts without having any idea about archaeological context and archaeological stratigraphy. I think these populist approaches are very harmful for the complexities of the past. I am not sure if Harrapan cultures, for him, are only confined to some cities or selective cities. Even his presentation on the monsoon is spurious too. I am sorry to say that Mr. Pattanaik must refrain from claiming something which he is not ware of.