Clickbait! There is no A390 in the works. Airbus already have a rival to 777x - it's called the A350.
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment ❤
@Airstrike_dababy6 ай бұрын
Bruh bruh he's literally write and ur like thx for the comment. What a npc. Well Airbus could just make a bigger a350 and maybe call it the a390 but the a350 is the perfect size yeah I don't think 2e need a bigger varient
@Recoverlerbotines6 ай бұрын
Brow hating and he’s like thx for hating💀💀💀💀💀💀
@TrainDdorf4 ай бұрын
But the A350 is worse
@Airstrike_dababy4 ай бұрын
@@TrainDdorf you get ur a** outta here
@petervautmans1996 ай бұрын
Source? for me this is BS and it is the last time i will click on anything FLIG AVIA
@mudassarnasir3 ай бұрын
Bro I love LOVE Airbus a380 so much because it’s so huge big
@FLIGAVIA3 ай бұрын
Yes, I love it too.
@nabilisur95663 ай бұрын
I never see AIRBUS A390 before and what it's gonna look like about A390 for the future ?
@FLIGAVIA3 ай бұрын
Because it's just a plan on the paper :) We will wait for its launch.
@nabilisur95663 ай бұрын
What, really @@FLIGAVIA ! If it is Garuda Indonesia will ordering AIRBUS A390 for the future, what is gonna look like for Garuda Indonesia that will have AIRBUS A390 for the future ?
@MasunPretious6 ай бұрын
The A350's advanced technology is what makes it stand out.
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
✈️✈️✈️✈️
@BrienEssa6 ай бұрын
Airbus’s use of composite materials was a smart move.
@Recoverlerbotines6 ай бұрын
Boeing is also using them on 787 and 777X wings
@CamillaAbdul6 ай бұрын
The A350’s efficiency is a big win for airlines looking to cut costs.
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
Yeah 🛫🛫🛫
@SergeiJag6 ай бұрын
It’s impressive how Airbus has already delivered over 600 A350s.
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
Yeah thanks for your feedback
@BotrosMillom6 ай бұрын
The A350’s cargo capability is a significant plus for airlines.
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
That’s right
@skirolf6 ай бұрын
Who is shocked? The videomaker?
@LennardA3208 күн бұрын
The A380 is again winning more popularity and more are flying again but it uses too much fuel. Can this kind of monster engines help to get the A380 back in service as the A380NEO with re-engining it putting 1 RR Ultra Fan or GE-9X on each side and the other two much smaller engines like the CFM-LEAP. So you have for the biggest part the power of the the 2 enormous engines and don't know if just that is enough. SO they can add 2 lighter engines for additional thrust. And if they can make the A380-800 lighter because the 800 was made more robust and heavier to accommodate a stretched version of the A380 like the 900 that never came. So it is too heavy They also can make more efficient wings because they had to make compromises to fit it on airports. So maybe foldable wings.
@AlfCalson6 ай бұрын
. 0:20 . A390 Three stories?
@RaquelHBurbidge6 ай бұрын
Boeing has a lot of catching up to do if they want to compete with the A350.
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@alexanderbelov68926 ай бұрын
6:33 It is named MS-21. МС-21 is written in Cyrillic alphabet. Acronym means 'Магистральные Самолёты 21 века' or 'Long-haul aircrafts of 21 century'.
@IssaKalirs6 ай бұрын
Boeing’s delay with the 777X has given Airbus a huge advantage.
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
Thanks for feedback
@elbuggo6 ай бұрын
When the plane is using less fuel, there will be more planes, and the total consumption of fuel will increase.
@CrownRider6 ай бұрын
The amount of fuel, per mile or kilometer, per passenger is much more interesting.
@elbuggo6 ай бұрын
@@CrownRider When the fuel consumption per seat is decreased, you will increase used seats and will need more planes. And those planes will use more fuel than was used before the fuel improvement. Is it that hard to grasp this?
@CrownRider6 ай бұрын
@@elbuggo No, it's not hard to grasp. Just a different way of looking at it. Don't you see that?
@johnchristmas75226 ай бұрын
Incorrect, more planes come about with more passengers, hence the original A380 (one aircraft instead of two) plus customers drive the aircraft demand on how they fly and where to. Airlines buy as less Aircraft as possible. They are hugely expensive. They only make a profit while in the air-not on the ground. Fuel is changing too, many new aircraft will be flying with fuel made from plants instead of oil. Its easy to be critical, without an answer or solution. Airlines and Engine manufacturers are spending billions on trying to go greener and still keep air fares within reach. All these advancements takes years or even decades, not weeks. Think of the emerging markets where there are no green requirements (China) Worry about their non green signature, its the largest!!!
@elbuggo6 ай бұрын
@@johnchristmas7522 RE: many new aircraft will be flying with fuel made from plants That is a delusional pipe dream, and totally pointless. Without cheap fuel, there will be no mass flying. Again, if a new plane use less fuel, there will be more tickets sold due to lower costs, and they will need more planes. Total consumption will then increase, and more polar bears on the North Pole will drown. Isn't that so?.
@ZacPlowman6 ай бұрын
I wonder if the 777X will eventually surpass the A350 in any area.
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment ✈️✈️✈️
@rogerredding52692 ай бұрын
I wonder how much longer when aircraft can take off and land like the Harrier jump jets? airliners or otherwise? It's a coming we hope.? Just dreaming. ?.
@LeondeLure6 ай бұрын
Conneries!
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
✈️
@Plane-Ship-Lover6 ай бұрын
Absolutely stupid, A360 will come first not A390. Just because Airbus went straight to A380 and skipped out 3 aircraft doesn't mean they may as well go to A390
@FeRnAnDo15386 ай бұрын
I don’t know. It is too soon since the A350 started their service. I will go with the A350Neo name and reserve the A360 for a groundbreaking technology BUT that is not totally convincing people. So, when people have totally confident in this new technology, you can use the A370, A390, and (prepare yourself) the A395.
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
thanks for your feedback
@Airstrike_dababy6 ай бұрын
Pretty sure this is bullshi but not completely cuz this is kind off what Airbus is going to do in the future like environmentally friendly engines
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
✈️✈️✈️ thanks for your feedback
@LiLo-ci3sl6 ай бұрын
Stupid clickbait... Really man?
@SnurX6 ай бұрын
Followed your channel but I can’t stand the clickbait anymore.
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
✈️
@pablorobertodurso88922 ай бұрын
A 390
@AlfCalson6 ай бұрын
✈️
@chrisweavers9036 ай бұрын
More nonsense from this channel 30 seconds was enough
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
✈️✈️✈️
@earlradius95116 ай бұрын
bogus news.. MAKES ME SICK.....
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
✈️✈️✈️
@roseroy1834 ай бұрын
The A3100 has 6 uppercut deck
@herceg67726 ай бұрын
A381 like A321 maybe
@NgeNgoc6 ай бұрын
Why don't they just skip A390 and go straight to A400. It sounds better.
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
yeah thanks for your comment
@sorgfaeltig5 ай бұрын
The Airbus A400 is already out. It's a four engine turboprop military transport plane.
@Recoverlerbotines6 ай бұрын
Bro just ran out of video ideas😂
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
Not really, do you have any recommendations? 🤣🤣🤣
@Recoverlerbotines6 ай бұрын
@@FLIGAVIA can u make a video about the rise and fall of Douglas airplanes
@The_Naviator13 күн бұрын
Not true.
@ronbrown3281Ай бұрын
This is all Wishful speculation - dangling on utter imagination !!!!!!!!!!!
@markpstapley6 ай бұрын
Bullshit click bait
@FLIGAVIA6 ай бұрын
✈️✈️✈️
@fortniteog964323 күн бұрын
FAAAAAKKKE
@TwistedAviationАй бұрын
Nothing in this video is true, airbus isnt developing a new plane.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
They will
@TwistedAviationАй бұрын
@@FLIGAVIA keyword, "will", not now, there is a big difference between will and now.
@LennardA3208 күн бұрын
It is just an AI Clickbate video. You can see this wirh videos showing about every 2 seconds a small piece of a video that corresponds with what is said in the video. A lot of the time showing not the true video from what Is said. AI Narration is sometimes hard to k ow if it is a real person. Ans is it a script written by the video maker or also just with ChatGPD
@TheChiefEng6 ай бұрын
While ultra long flights may be a goal in itself, these ultra long haul flights are rarely economical unless the airplane is configured with premium cabins only. Flying an airplane on an ultra long flight lasting 19-20 hours cannot be made economical, at least not today, if the airplane cabin layout is standard with 40-60 premium seats and the rest normal economy seats. The reason the ultra long haul flights can only be made economical with a fully premium seat cabin is fuel. For an ultra long haul flight, the airplane must be able to load much more fuel for the flight and that means a heavier airplane which again means a poor overall economy unless you can get the money in and earn a profit and that is only possible at the moment if the entire airplane cabin is configured with premium seats only.