Flew on a C919 in China on a domestic flight and it was great, can't wait to fly on the C939.
@dehua-2730Ай бұрын
Just flew on the C919 from Taiyuan to Shanghai, just a tad smaller for the tray and baggage compartments, other than that the landing was pretty smooth. At the beginning they made fun of Chinese EV like 10 years ago, now VW along with the other legacy automakers are on the verge to bankrupt. For the aviation industry it may take a bit longer. Maybe in 10 years the Chinese airplane will have a fair market share but for EVs China is already 10 years ahead of western automakers.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
Awesome. Jealous of you! I haven't had a chance to fly it yet. Any tips?
@dehua-2730Ай бұрын
@@FLIGAVIA haha tips? buy a ticket and fly. it's no different than any other flights. It's special because it's Chinese made.
@EssenerPastaАй бұрын
hi Taiyuaner, i really love there
@freeworld88888Ай бұрын
I flied many times. It is specious than 737. Great experience. Similar to Airbus
@JenHope118Ай бұрын
Saudi Arabia just offered the C919 to open factories in Saudi. China Eastern Airline just order 100 C919.
@Mr-hn2bpАй бұрын
With millions of engineers graduating every year,China won't have problems stepping up production.
@Mr-hn2bpАй бұрын
When one considers the space technology, communication achievements and military hardwares, one shouldn't have a doubt of Chinese aviation capabilities. ARJ and C919 safty records should booster one's confidence whereas those of Boeing are confidence shattering.
@ntxoovyiasyaj-jerry9937Ай бұрын
Copying each other is the most human essential trait that sustain our survival, on this earth, until today.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
yep, true
@JenHope118Ай бұрын
Yes, innovate from existing technologies.
@darbas57Ай бұрын
Comac is following the footsteps of Airbus. But it is starting with fresher technologies. Good luck.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
do you think they can do as well as Airbus did in the past?
@darbas57Ай бұрын
@FLIGAVIA They have done so with cars. Although cars are simpler.
@Mr-hn2bpАй бұрын
@@FLIGAVIAOnly better
@7subbaАй бұрын
Well done Chinese scientists and engineers make longer range and larger than Boeing and Airbus keep it up. Best of luck.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
do you wanna fly with COMAC?
@devontucker157221 күн бұрын
Already have, there were no worries
@cleopatra3206Ай бұрын
Do not underestimate China in making airplanes, like they did for EV cars. Better to be ready to compete.
@fabio8726Ай бұрын
I fly in china with c919, as passenger i dont feel difference vs airbus a320 take me from point A to point B.. i need just this
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
very nice, thanks for your sharing
@afzaalkhan.mАй бұрын
Striving for bigger aircraft.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
yep they will develop much better in the future ✈
@TheTeaParty320Ай бұрын
I can’t wait to fly the C919. Just waiting for an opportunity to come.
@noboliNoАй бұрын
Winnie banned in China dude
@TheTeaParty320Ай бұрын
@ I know. Might have to change my avatar before going. But then again, I look like the Chindian version of Winnie, complete with big belly and all.
@RTang001Ай бұрын
China is a country that does what it preaches.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
That's right!
@deltavee2Ай бұрын
@@FLIGAVIA The Hell it does, both of you.
@Mr-hn2bpАй бұрын
Go fly Boeing to heaven @@deltavee2
@nancytai155027 күн бұрын
Good analysis!
@FLIGAVIA27 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@Mr-hn2bpАй бұрын
Aviation ABC: Airbus, Boeing and Comac.
@didier7868Ай бұрын
Airbus + Boeing is a "duopoly" not a monopoly. The economic theory (strategic interactions!!) is very different from a monopoly.
@ddream777Ай бұрын
Boeing's gone, dude. Au revoir.
@didier7868Ай бұрын
@ddream777 how do you know I speak French ?
@fabio8726Ай бұрын
@@didier7868 your name is didier......
@didier7868Ай бұрын
@@fabio8726 grazzie
@ddream777Ай бұрын
@@didier7868 Neineinnein, I was just trying to convey you the good news. Thought you'd root for Airbus.
@raymondtay353214 күн бұрын
Well done China Superpower COMAC have developed a new C939 aircraft much better than others vendor 💪💪👏👏👍👍💯💯♥️♥️
@fafileblond9202Ай бұрын
The new rival of Airbus is born. Bye bye Boeing !❤
@ratnabahadurgurung9850Ай бұрын
A amazing news congratulations China.
@PhilipTan-i1uАй бұрын
Wow, China is releasing more and more news on its development of the wide body long range C939 as a modern and fuel efficient competitor of Boeing's 777X. Comac is seriously becoming a great civil aviation competitor that will take away large slices of the global market share of the western aircraft manufacturers.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
That's right!
@jettim91217 күн бұрын
Even if no country is willing to buy passenger aircraft produced in China, China itself is a huge market for passenger aircraft. For Boeing and Airbus, they will lose a large piece of the cake. Objectively speaking, it is a good thing to see competition.
@manoruasoi6357Ай бұрын
Great work China! 🎊 👏 💐
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
Cheer!
@ericyang4310Ай бұрын
This is a huge dream for China people that China can produce all goods that benefit human beings. C939 is the next one after successfully launching C919 and then 929 aircrafts.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
yep if there are many aircraft manufacturers in the market, the customers will benefit in the end.
@MartinChadwick-xe7gh6 күн бұрын
Wiki lists C919 deliveries as 2022: 1, 2023: 2, 2024: 13. So perhaps finally C919 deliveries may be taking off.
@FLIGAVIA6 күн бұрын
It started flying kkk
@achekholbeckal8895 күн бұрын
Order books 500+
@TheGrateful10816 күн бұрын
China can scale up any production within months. The real challenge is designing a better engine of their own (they are working on that)
@brian-gj4cl14 күн бұрын
and many sub-systems to be developed. Engine is the biggest problem of course.
@ongyewleng4718Ай бұрын
COMAC must be aware that travellers are very concerned with aviation safety. Boeing's downfall is caused by its recent safety lapses.
@sajeewakalamba1796Ай бұрын
Airline passengers are not concerned about safety. They still fly in Boeing planes after all these drama
@feihuo7874Ай бұрын
@@sajeewakalamba1796 before they have better choice. The dead of Boeing will be crash.
@theinfralink6598Ай бұрын
That’s why they need a third option.
@ktan673818 күн бұрын
I prefer 919 over Boeing planes. 919 passed all modern aviation tests which 737 didn't. However usa n eu refused to accept 919 because of politics. Anyway I expect more 919 flying from china to other countries direct soon. 919 already flying from hk to china.
@FLIGAVIA17 күн бұрын
Yes. Will you fly on it if having chance? 😊
@TánNguyēnANHtán-f2d12 күн бұрын
❤
@TánNguyēnANHtán-f2d12 күн бұрын
Olay total effects and the city
@LetsGoUSA26 күн бұрын
African nations will buy these planes.😊
@ЕвлампийИванов-э2рАй бұрын
В условиях усиливания западных санкций Китаю лучше сосредоточить усилия на создание своих двигателей и авионики для уже созданных авиалайнеров.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
It's just a matter of time. They will definitely do it.
@Ben-qe8cxАй бұрын
@@FLIGAVIAChina has manufactured advanced passenger aircraft engines CJ1000a and CJ2000 for C919 and C929.
@achekholbeckal8895 күн бұрын
Curious will there be C949 ?
@TánNguyēnANHtán-f2d12 күн бұрын
Lay
@kwwong2893Ай бұрын
C939 will probably available 20 years later
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
I think not that far 😂
@waltbroedner4754Ай бұрын
You are wrong, Wong, China has done the incredible, amazing things it has achieved in only 50 years, it can build a whole hospital in 3 days, it will have the 939 before you can say "I'm right Walt".
@kwwong2893Ай бұрын
@@waltbroedner4754 only time will tell who is right, who is wrong. Don't be overconfident
@Hendramail200021 күн бұрын
Good post
@marciamenage931Ай бұрын
The antigravitic craft will replace all current aircraft. Please report on these, start with the TR3B.
@JO5-y1kАй бұрын
Most African nations will be switching over to the C Series aircraft. Competition is always good.
@JoseAlgoso-f9s13 күн бұрын
He I will fly the c919
@FLIGAVIA13 күн бұрын
Amazing!
@benedictchin5261Ай бұрын
Hydrogen engines please
@wkpeterf29 күн бұрын
C939 Made in China🎉🎉🎉
@FLIGAVIA29 күн бұрын
Amazing!
@HereNowOOOАй бұрын
LOL so many secretly worried commenters sipping on copium and spewing clueless claims...
@paulheydarian128126 күн бұрын
Lots of keyboard warriors on all sides...😁
@InewCenter-t6t17 күн бұрын
Like everything else chyna will have take away this aviation too
Разница между Аирбасом , Боингом и Китайским самолетом лишь в сборке остальное все взято с одних и тех же компаний.
@bogawaАй бұрын
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
@HuwadwinkАй бұрын
Boeing is not doing good.
@nabilisur9566Ай бұрын
Oh boy ! I love this video about the new C939 will shock the entire aviation industry like this. I wish Indonesia can build commercial plane, freighter plane, fighter plane, tanker plane helicopter etc by own country in the future of developed country ever for Indonesia on 2045 years later.
@VankyOfLagosАй бұрын
Every year talks upon talks, no American support, no engine, no American avionics no flight. Things have not been Rossy for China 🇨🇳 as it was before Trump 2016
@alexskatit418829 күн бұрын
yeah, keep dreaming. China is now the largest car exporter. They are smart, not like your people.
@AuralioCabal-nl8giАй бұрын
Where or who will provide Avionics and Engines? Simple answers will suffice.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
With the current C919, it is still supplied by the West. Hopefully, by the time the C939 is produced, they will be able to do everything themselves.
@Mr-hn2bpАй бұрын
The spare tires are in the trunk. Just look at the Harmony system of Huawei which is build for IOT. J20 and J35 are better than F-22 and F-35, respectively. Rolls Royce is moving research and production to China to survive.
@ernabong4883Ай бұрын
looks exactly like airbus A321
@AbrahamFarrellАй бұрын
Your comment looks like prejudice and racism.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
Is it good or bad? Idk
@georgewilder7423Ай бұрын
So what...who cares what it looks like?? It's performance that counts!!
@JenHope118Ай бұрын
Yes , an innovation from the Airbus...just like how people innovate the French elevator, the Germans' trains, the Americans' internet, the Chinese porcelain, crossbow, tea culture , sil making technologies etc etc. The huge Manhattan project was a participation of various nationalities from German , French, Chinese, Arabs, etc.
@daoistwanderer2671Ай бұрын
Aha, how different can planes look from one to another if they have to comply with aerodynamic principles? Just as Boeing and Airbus look so much alike, a plane being a plane.
@yiaplengwee590912 күн бұрын
Obviously can..................
@FLIGAVIA11 күн бұрын
☺️
@hughdoyle7059Ай бұрын
Try and use more temperature headlines/language unless you want your blog to be treated as a comic.
If CFM stops supplying jet engines, what are they going do?
@slashsaussier13 күн бұрын
They will create their own engine. CFM aren’t stupid and they know that
@davisho363812 күн бұрын
Just try it.....China will SURVIVE
@12nad229 күн бұрын
现在已经在测试CJ1000了,可以去看看
@2LT-c8q9 күн бұрын
@ 必須的,遲早又被老美耍了。
@UlyaGaniya13 күн бұрын
If it ain't Boeing I ain't going
@FLIGAVIA13 күн бұрын
So will you try Comac?
@Rogermoore-r5p7 күн бұрын
Good luck!
@wongpohchan94854 күн бұрын
Going down, you mean. After the wheels and doors have dropped off first.
@jaromasar840429 күн бұрын
No it wont ,thaåt plane is build 80% by western tech. Prehabs you should go as Russia, completely independent.
@brentpinkney739429 күн бұрын
Oh dear. Supplemental Type Certification allows COMAC to incrementally swap out Western components as their own supply chain matures.
@kentriat242622 күн бұрын
From what I read it was to be 80% imported parts but in 2021 the western components suppliers pulled out in most cases under government direction. Since then through reverse engineering China is now producing a 63% internal supply of components which will rise to 84% in 2026 which will include new aircraft engines that are now in final certification. Italy will be the key supplier of remaining external parts supplier as they did not stop supply in 2021.
@tonydecastro634017 күн бұрын
all hype at this point. China does NOT produce the engines for the aircraft that it manufactures. the C919 does not use Chinese produced engines. the C929 does NOT EXIST YET. to talk about a C939 is therefore all blah blah blah at this point.
@@ajjiang-xm2sz that's all you can say, a moronic statement by an ignoramus???
@JMLE194921 күн бұрын
you are kidding!
@FLIGAVIA20 күн бұрын
Why
@davisho363822 күн бұрын
AMAZING CHINA.....THE WORLD SUPER POWER COUNTRY
@jacintochua688516 күн бұрын
Why can't others build their own planets ? Disrupt the monopolies? Did you hear yourself.?
@leoyoung893616 күн бұрын
China will soon disrupt this order! Trust me!
@sunset3052Ай бұрын
clickbait! i wanna see 919 first and then 929.
@FLIGAVIAАй бұрын
Not clickbait, they are planning kkk
@幽谷客-g3m17 күн бұрын
比要命的印度波音飞机好
@FLIGAVIA17 күн бұрын
Haha.
@yocto338917 күн бұрын
This is word salad, saying the same again and again, wasting your time. this is AI video
@EasySocialMediaNZАй бұрын
Lol - without local engines, landing gear or avionics, it’s not really the game changer you suggest it is
@UCantSeeemeeeАй бұрын
Without Chinese magnetic alloy airplane would not be possible . About 90% China rare earth magnet production is in China , even USA f35 depend on China
@Mr-hn2bpАй бұрын
China is the only country possessing all industrial categories enlisted by UN. China is the largest ship builder building full spectrum of commercial and military ships. One country builds a space station, the best global positioning system and lands the Mars in one try. A population of 1.45 billion with a literacy rate of 97% and annual STEM graduants exceeding 10 million, the potential is immense!
@raychamberland4381Ай бұрын
BRAVO CHINA
@michaelloong964Ай бұрын
This is a fake news. C929 is still on the drawing board, COMAC is a brand new civil plane manufacturer and hence is not stupid to design two brand new models of large airplane simultaneously. To design a brand new model airplane needs about 6000-7000experienced engineers. Where does COMAC get 12000-14000 experienced civil airplane design engineers??? IF COMAC can find so many experienced designed engineers at the same time, how does COMAC keep these designed engineers on the pay roll if COMAC does not have another two brand new civil to design?? Even Boeing or Airbus cannot afford to employ so many engineers to design two brand new models at the same time.BTW, COMAC is a brand new civil plane design company compared with Boeing and Airbus.
@sthradhervernon7654Ай бұрын
You are full of it.
@fabio8726Ай бұрын
@@michaelloong964 you know how many graduate engineering in china every year? About 5 million... italy about 10.000...if only 0.5% of 5 million is a genius engineering... end of the story for western
@AbrahamFarrellАй бұрын
Typical prejudice racist false exceptionalism sour grapes mind set. Ten years ago, was China a leader in EV technology? Ten years from now they'll own the Automobile Industry. kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZ3bdKWar7t4fs0
@georgewilder7423Ай бұрын
C929 still on the drawing board?? Then what was that on show and flying at the recent Zhuhai air show?? Was that the latest DJI drone??😂😂
@fabio8726Ай бұрын
@@michaelloong964 china: 5 million engineering graduate any year... if only 0.5% is a geniale engineer we are fu.ck.ed
@davidlo16888814 күн бұрын
Definitely, China is so foolish to do so.
@FLIGAVIA13 күн бұрын
Can I know the reason?
@davidlo16888812 күн бұрын
@@FLIGAVIA To milk from the bull. Generator, electronics system, etc. should be sourced outside. Without American President's mercy, China won't obtain a.m. supplies for C939.
@winterYTB6 күн бұрын
哈哈哈哈,井蛙😂
@yorksof22Ай бұрын
Nah, they won't make any impact as long as FAA and EASA don't issue any type certification for them, and they should do that not just for the sake of prevent accidents happened, but to ensure they never stand any chances of threatening us.
@alexskatit418829 күн бұрын
The world is not just USA and Europe.
@devontucker157221 күн бұрын
A little competition will help with safety, Airbus has had a factory in China for over a decade now
@alfredkcwong500821 күн бұрын
Enjoy yr flight in Boeing plane.😂😂😂
@COX2NSAID11 күн бұрын
That probably does not matter. Their market in mainland China is large enough for C919 to survive. Provided that there is enough safety flying records and operation time, the C919 has a very high chance to win over the Asian market, southern american market, and african market.
@alcmmk50405 күн бұрын
Chinese have not fixed the C919 problems but they want to build C939. The planes are not ETOP. It means they can't fly over water,ie Ocean, lakes. Only Chinese airlines purchased these aircrafts. Flying Comac planes don't forget to increase life insurance..🎉🎉🎉🎉
@vucaja16 күн бұрын
Thank you, I have no time to waste on chinese plane , car and anything other from China. In mi life, Im not seat in this !!!!
@FLIGAVIA15 күн бұрын
Can I know the reason?🥲
@jeanhuynh854813 күн бұрын
Honestly no one care what you like or don’t like! Furthermore WTH are you doing here in the first place?
@davehorton7712Ай бұрын
who paid you to spout this rubbish???
@mele5007Ай бұрын
your mom
@AuralioCabal-nl8giАй бұрын
CCP!😂
@kennedy6618Ай бұрын
@dave, you clicked 3 times...that means you paid 3 times! Keep clicking pal!😂
@davehorton7712Ай бұрын
@@kennedy6618 I did not pay anything Ad blocker works perfectly
@chrisw.5138Ай бұрын
Is this is a CCP propaganda channel?
@liongjiahwong5478Ай бұрын
There are democracy propaganda channels too.
@gelinrefiraАй бұрын
Are you a CIA bot earning from that 1.6B pot?
@Geoff020650Ай бұрын
@chrisw.5138. Kind of, it also propagandize the Rolls Royce engines as well, as these are the current engines designed for the series.
@davidlamb8229Ай бұрын
the c939 is dependant upon western technology. China does noy have the facilities nor the infastructure to be a world dominating aircraft
@UCantSeeemeeeАй бұрын
Just like Boeing , Airbus depend on Chinese part. Without Chinese magnet alloy, how could your airplane fly? You think every part in Western countries are made by themselves?
@betojyeАй бұрын
...if they don't have infrastructure, how do they manufacture their Y-20 heavy freighter...!?...of course, some technologies still depend on the West...the question is:...until when...!?...they are investing heavily in the area...and besides, the Russians can replace the West...and the objective is not to dominate anyone...their market will need more than 1000 planes..!!!..
@AbrahamFarrellАй бұрын
No, it's not. The United States has taken the position to prevent China from Advance western technology. China will go it alone develop their airliner and surpass Boeing and Airbus, all with home grown technology.
@georgewilder7423Ай бұрын
@@AbrahamFarrell Yep... absolutely!!
@syedkhalid452Ай бұрын
If you have technical competence and come to conclusion that it is dependent on western technology (off course for some components) then it’s a challenge for Comac if those parts are sanctioned, but if you just wrote this comments without any basis then I think you can be classified as arrogant and hypocrite about west supremacy
@merrillkingston8807Ай бұрын
I would stay home before I would fly on any aircraft built by the CCP.
@cleopatra3206Ай бұрын
You mean like Chinese EV cars as well? BTW you’ve forgotten those 737 max crashes?
@cedric3379Ай бұрын
Lemme guess the phone/desktop/whatever you are using to type this comment relies heavily on CCP-made-component especially the battery that might explode better keep an eye on that before worrying about airplanes lmao
@HereNowOOOАй бұрын
Sure. Stick to the 737 Max. It is "safer"...
@paulheydarian128126 күн бұрын
They claim this CCP plane magically transforms its passengers into committed hardcore communists.👀🇨🇳
@alfredkcwong500821 күн бұрын
Fly Boeing will be the best choice.🤣🤣🤣🤪🤪🤪
@changboni24 күн бұрын
Brueni-based Gallop Air is owned by the Chinese!
@ziauddin794815 күн бұрын
China will achive technology to develop its own aircraft turbofan engines # 👍👍👍❤️🇵🇰
@FLIGAVIA15 күн бұрын
Sure! Probably not long now.
@_Wai_Wai_15 күн бұрын
China already produces the WS series of jet engines for fighters.
@Jeff-sm8ofАй бұрын
The Yanks think they have an ace up their sleeve. Deny certification. It's boring and airbutt that must get CAAC certification if want to fly to all brics countries.
@georgeszurbach444Ай бұрын
A lot of rubbish !
@derekee197311 күн бұрын
We Singaporeans fly Safely with the B777-300ER, B787, B737, A330, A380. A320. Well Proven over the Years on Short and Long Haul Flights. No Thank You on Anything China Chinese.
@Ja1369L811 күн бұрын
yes, you will always live like rats in the tiny island.
@independentvoice668610 күн бұрын
Wish you luck on Boeing
@albert-kl8bm9 күн бұрын
Our Taiwan governor said singapore is a nose shxxt tiny country, all you need is bicycle and live in the underground.
@Rogermoore-r5p7 күн бұрын
Monkeys!
@choonfonglee53255 күн бұрын
Fly SIA for turbulence injury claims. Even MRT is performing like Indian Railways/Mumbai Metro