Akh-Right Bro Mo Hijab BULLIES & TAUNTS Muslim Woman, Implies She's an INFIDEL! : My ANGRY Response

[@SaltLake180]

I am so glad to have found your channel. I am flabbergasted to see how M. Hijab bullied that woman and even called her a kafir. Unbelievable! Thanks for taking him on.

[@TheWiseChronicles]

As someone who was just beginning to learn about Islam.. mo hajib and all dawah were the first people I found on KZbin and it really turned me away from Islam. It’s refreshing to hear other perspectives

[@John-wg9mb]

You should try Muslim Latern. He’s more for people who are new to Islam.

[@Contagious93812]

@@John-wg9mb muslim lantern literally supports the apostasy law in islam.. he agrees they should be killed after the waiting period if they don't revert to islam...

[@theguyver4934]

@@John-wg9mb Muslim lantern feels like a wannabe troll to me and i'm not saying because i hate him or anything it's just personally how i feel about people like him and i'm saying that as a muslim

[@faridaali8758]

Hi Lynd the word ‘mutasyabih’ here means similar not ambiguous.We can find the same word in Al Baqara where God described the situation in paradise where the people there would eat the similar food as in here on Earth

[@dodgysmum8340]

@@John-wg9mbseriously? He’s like a lobotomised (and that’s going some) meaner Ali Dawah.

[@tysonvslewis12]

Really well done!

[@camelkingofthemediteranean949]

I never liked Muhammad Hijab. I think he is very arrogant.

[@LeafSouls]

I think he is humble, just too loud and harsh

[@homer1273]

@@LeafSoulsI don’t think you understand the meaning of the word “humble”

[@homer1273]

@@LeafSouls hijab is an arrogant piece …..!

[@LeafSouls]

@@homer1273 he once admitted he doesn't understand divine simplicity and he was way too im his head Seems humble to me

[@Natalie-fj7fs]

He’s arrogant and proud. Not a single cell of humbleness exists in his being.

[@a.d8022]

I am not a big fan of Hijab. Too agressive. He lacks finesse.

[@mansoor.ashraf]

Its not only Hijab, most clerics are doing this. They are oblivious of the fact that soon they will be irrelevant... it is also due to these tactics that they dont want people particularly women to get an education.

[@زينب44]

They're always yelling too. I can't stand to listen to it.

[@TBertin]

Thug!

[@classicalmuslim]

Muhammad Hijab just accused himself of kufr by his own definition. He interpreted a mutashabih (ambiguous) verse. The word _degree_ in the verse _{Men have a degree}_ over women is ambiguous. But he offered an interpretative translation it: a degree "of authority". The verse doesn't say this. It just says _degree_ and leaves it ambiguous. He's once again displayed nothing but arrogance, ill-manners and lack of patience in communication. His nafs (ego), from what I can detect, is simply too big to be a public spokesperson for the faith. No humility. An embarrassment for Muslims.

[@Muslimah1987]

Ahh....this was very triggering, less because of the topic and more the same blatantly gaslighting tactics ad crookedness that I witnessed within my family of origin...thank GOD for being out of there, such poison literally destroys your soul.

[@daveyd6094]

Akh-Right is a play on Alt-Right?

[@Gabriel-ServantOfGod]

6:40 Every time people quote 3:7 it disturbs me, after i heard the interpretation of it referring to the Qiraat, which then explains the "similar" verses, people translate it as ambiguous, what a great mistake. I believe, God knows best. But this interpretation is the only one which explains it all in a cohesive manner, that's why i take it. The verses who are the mother of the book have no qiraat difference, they are secured, and the ones which have qiraat differences are similar, to each other, Maliki, Maaliki, but are not exactly the same. And people use this to create fitnah, seeking it's interpretation "Is it Malik or Maalik?" But none know its true interpretation, except God. And those firm in knowledge, they say "We believe in it, it's all from our Lord" And it makes sense. I had the tendency to deny the multiplicity of the Qur'an, but then it is true that if you check it, it makes sense. To mean, i haven't found a false Qiraat yet... God is both King and Owner of Judgement Day, both are true. And the same with many other cases. But even then, the mother of the book verses are secured, so even if those failed, the dhikr is preserved. That's the beauty of the Qur'an, it predicted what people would try to debase it... and set systems on place to make it inexpugnable...

[@TheExplorer-e1j]

'And people use this to create fitnah, seeking it's interpretation "Is it Malik or Maalik?"' That's interesting. I came across a video just the other day of Hijab trying to debunk a quran only guy and as a way to 'debunk' him Hijab raised this question. I don't know where he went with it because the arrogance and intimidation he was emitting towards the guy had me furious I had to stop it.

[@Gabriel-ServantOfGod]

@@TheExplorer-e1j Tha's why as Yakub alaihi salam said "Patience is most fitting" (or the likes), patience my brother. Sometimes we are mistaken, or rush to assumption, but it's better to take time until a better answer comes, with knowledge. I'm a bit fed up of the internet not gonna lie. So i might not comment more, glad this helped. Peace

[@economician]

The problem is no the takfiring but Rather it is that they are su bullish, violent and intolerant. We Quranists also do takfir but nobody has ever accused us of being bullies or opressors. The problem With neo-salafis but also with salafized sunnies is that their sources call upon violonce and oppression against those who do not follow the dogma of the sunnah and that is why their takfiring becomes dangerous.

[@thezealouschristian9759]

Hello Dr Hashmi, I am a Christian who has started reading the Quran and is looking into Islam. I really like your interpretation of the Quran. Thank you for your videos. I have subscribed. Please keep making them. We need more kind Muslims like you. Would you consider doing a video on Quran 2:230 and how it leads to Halala marriage. This is a verse I struggle with. Seems a bit family wrecking to me. Thank you.

[@DrJavadTHashmi]

Thanks for the kind comment. As for Q. 2:230, I agree that the juristic tradition created a mess of it by taking an extremely legalistic approach. Instead, I think we should simply look at the contextual meaning and purpose of the verse, which was to curtail the practice that was prevalent at the time: men at that time would continually divorce their wives and then remarry them in order to exert power over them and take away their rights. So, this verse was pronounced to stop this practice. It had nothing to do with the practice of "ḥalālah." For the record, even the vast majority of traditionalist jurists forbid the practice, although one can consider it an unfortunate byproduct of their way of their thinking, especially in the context of their ruling on triple divorce. As for your interest in Islam, might I suggest that you consider that you might already be a "muslim" in the general and original meaning of the term, which included Christians? Please check out the debate I had with Shadee Elmasry on this topic. It is viewable under the Live tab of my KZbin channel. Have a great day, and Merry Christmas!

[@Ibn_Abdulaziz1405]

​@@DrJavadTHashmi You are not a Muslim. The laws of ridda will be used. Enjoy your respite among disbelievers.

[@adamkhan7469]

I can't stand this Mo Hijab guy, man is all talk.

[@Cassim125]

Hijab uses tons of jargon & aggression to act smart and his followers swallow his sophistry thinking big jargon = truth

[@TheExplorer-e1j]

Excellent video! Superb commentary. This guy needs to return to the unknown for the sake of humanity.

[@Renesmee15Jake25]

The best and most far reaching point (that I find) that you make in the video is how 'these people' keep the knowledge of other interpretation to themselves! They just gatekeep it. That is intellectual dishonesty. That is WRONG. A genuine person eould say there are various interpretations however I believe this one. They would not pass judgements like that and downgrade or humiliate. Thank you for the good work you are doing. May God increase for you the goodness❤

[@JamesHolmes-br7pd]

The irony is that the unclear verses hes mentioned, he himself and the mainstream clergy transgress on that verse by trying to understand them literally e.g. calling Muslim believers in evolution kafiroon because his interpretation of ambiguous verses imply some magic creationist event.

[@shaunshaikh8617]

Dr Hashmi, will you be posting the videos from your previous channel. There was some great content in there which I wouldnt want to lose access to.

[@DrJavadTHashmi]

I will have to think about how to put it out. I am trying to make sure every video that comes out meets a minimum level of quality, both content-wise and production quality-wise.

[@shaunshaikh8617]

@@DrJavadTHashmi Thanks for responding. I really miss the great work you did on early Islamic history and the letters of Urwa ibn Zubair. People need to know.

[@souheilfenghour5718]

Great video Mr Hashmi. By the way, the term “akh-right” ingenious.

[@spreaderofalhaqq]

😭😭😭😭 makes me so sad im gonna cry what a crazy man!!!11! heejab da takfeeereee 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

[@Alburr250]

Asalamualikum Dr Hashmi. I studied the works of Dr Khaled Abou El Fadl. He is a lawyer and a trained jurist based in the US. These 4 books I would highly recommend and they will take the reader down the rabbit hole regarding those who are Salafis or Wahhabis and how the puritans are extremely aggressive and zealous. 1. The Great Theft (very educational about the differences between the puritans and moderates) 2. The Search for the Beauty in Islam (a very heartwarming and beautiful book) 3. Speaking in God’s name (this book analyzes some fatwas from Saudia and the misogynistic Hadiths that they use and why they are problematic. 4. And God knows the soldiers (a shorter version of the Book mentioned in no 3. I am currently reading Reasoning with God and it’s a very deep read about the Shariah.

[@roamingtraveller7544]

Javad, you have called Hijab “thug” out of jealousy which is evident. Hijab is trying to manage an irate woman. You have twisted the facts to malign Hijab unsuccessfully. Simply pathetic!

[@vfxcyber425]

I also love Hijab and his work but sometime people make mistakes and Javed was right that he was trying to put the lady at a hard place to defend her for not knowing much about Islam and everyone is there for learning so it is not about jealousy

[@king_hhh]

If a person can't learn adaab from the Qur'an then what's the necessity of deen?

[@Lightbulb909]

For me, I realized Mo Hijab was not a good source for understanding Islaam when made that video about Mufti Abu Layth, that then likely resulted in his family getting assaulted in their home. He didn’t make a response video until a whole week later. This event opened my eyes that this man is a provocateur and entertainer. He said he studied philosophy-what an insult to philosophy.

[@urmani-w3f]

Wah , Ostad❤❤❤

[@cantrikcaraka8259]

No one knows the takwil except Allah. However, Hijab knows the takwil. What does that imply then?

[@Gabriel-ServantOfGod]

Tbh i don't see an issue with patriarchy. I do believe the idea of the head of the family being the man is fine. This never justified abuse, just be normal, a good believer... I don't see the issue... Do what you can... to be good. Your wife isn't your slave, i mean this is common sense. The degree being the financial superiority makes sense yeah. God knows best. Feminism is indeed toxic, just as the redpill. The Qur'an has the perfect balance i believe. Men and women are different. They are equal on some regards, not on others. Sometimes the man has more priviledges, others the woman, and the opposite with responsabilities... Balanced system It's equity, not equality. Equality is in a way Satanic, because God is the supreme authority, he is not equal to us, the hierarchy is inherent to existence, you can't dissolve it all, but Satan wants to dissolve it so we deem ourselves equal to God when we are not... But a bit of it may be justified of course, it depends on the situation. Peace

[@Dead_or_Wild]

It's rational, kind, and authentic scholars such as yourself, that have led me to Islam. It's maniacs like hijab that have besmirched the legacy of the Prophet (Upon him be peace.) Thank you for your work. May Allah SWT bless you.

[@1neminutebonk3rs3]

LOL! YOU call yourself a Muslim!! Okay.. Let me ask you this, which sect do you belong to? OH You will say, I am just muslim... i hate to break it to you that there is Shia Islam, Sunni islam and others. You most likely think of Islam as the one interpretted by SUnni school of thought. But let me tell you a historical fact the word Shia comes from Shian-e-ALi (Friends of Ali) historically. Who is ALi? The family of Muhammad... and about whom in Quran there is command from the AL MIGHTY that "Love Ahl e Bait (family of Prophet)" [Chapter 42: Verse 23] Historically speaking, the one who stood with the family of the Prophet, the ones who abide by Quran were perscuted at the hands of later converts like Umayyad, and Abbasids. And those who suffered for their faith are now called Shia and those who persecuted others in the name of religion for political gains are now called Sunnis. And that is the reaosn why Islam (sunni Islam) is the most wide spread and Non Muslims think of it as mysogynistic and misguided.

[@Farhadmoh]

I agree it’s dangerous which will cause many people to leave Islam

[@Farhadmoh]

What hijab should have Quran meant they have degree above women in responsibility not superiority. Which biologically makes sense

[@clarejones2421]

❤ Thank you for this Hijab needs to closed down he has nothing to give to Islam

[@commandar88]

thats only something someone who is threathened by the Truth of Islam would say

[@clarejones2421]

@@commandar88 Thats what someone who blind follows would say 👍🏽

[@commandar88]

@@clarejones2421 awww now you are projecting 💛

[@ankhmorpok1497]

@@commandar88 stop your blind idol worship of this takfiri mysogenist thug, Hijab.

[@commandar88]

@@ankhmorpok1497 time for you to take your shahada again

[@Story_Fuel]

More videos like this pls

[@JoesefParker]

Muslim women are required to cover themselves in order to protect themselves. Surah Al-Ahzab [33:59] يٰۤـاَيُّهَا النَّبِىُّ قُلْ لِّاَزۡوَاجِكَ وَبَنٰتِكَ وَنِسَآءِ الۡمُؤۡمِنِيۡنَ يُدۡنِيۡنَ عَلَيۡهِنَّ مِنۡ جَلَابِيۡبِهِنَّ ؕ ذٰ لِكَ اَدۡنٰٓى اَنۡ يُّعۡرَفۡنَ فَلَا يُؤۡذَيۡنَ ؕ وَكَانَ اللّٰهُ غَفُوۡرًا رَّحِيۡمًا O Prophet! Ask your wives, daughters, and believing women to draw their cloaks over their bodies. In this way it is more likely that they will be recognized as virtuous and not be harassed. And Allah is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful. [Surah Al-Ahzab 33:59] Surah An-Noor [24:31] وَقُل لِّلْمُؤْمِنَـٰتِ يَغْضُضْنَ مِنْ أَبْصَـٰرِهِنَّ وَيَحْفَظْنَ فُرُوجَهُنَّ وَلَا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلَّا مَا ظَهَرَ مِنْهَا ۖ وَلْيَضْرِبْنَ بِخُمُرِهِنَّ عَلَىٰ جُيُوبِهِنَّ ۖ وَلَا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلَّا لِبُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ ءَابَآئِهِنَّ أَوْ ءَابَآءِ بُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ أَبْنَآئِهِنَّ أَوْ أَبْنَآءِ بُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ إِخْوَٰنِهِنَّ أَوْ بَنِىٓ إِخْوَٰنِهِنَّ أَوْ بَنِىٓ أَخَوَٰتِهِنَّ أَوْ نِسَآئِهِنَّ أَوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَـٰنُهُنَّ أَوِ ٱلتَّـٰبِعِينَ غَيْرِ أُو۟لِى ٱلْإِرْبَةِ مِنَ ٱلرِّجَالِ أَوِ ٱلطِّفْلِ ٱلَّذِينَ لَمْ يَظْهَرُوا۟ عَلَىٰ عَوْرَٰتِ ٱلنِّسَآءِ ۖ وَلَا يَضْرِبْنَ بِأَرْجُلِهِنَّ لِيُعْلَمَ مَا يُخْفِينَ مِن زِينَتِهِنَّ ۚ وَتُوبُوٓا۟ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ جَمِيعًا أَيُّهَ ٱلْمُؤْمِنُونَ لَعَلَّكُمْ تُفْلِحُونَ And tell the believing women to lower their gaze and guard their chastity, and not to reveal their adornments except what normally appears. Let them draw their veils over their chests, and not reveal their hidden adornments except to their husbands, their fathers, their fathers-in-law, their sons, their stepsons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons or sisters’ sons, their fellow women, those bondwomen in their possession, male attendants with no desire, or children who are still unaware of women’s nakedness. Let them not stomp their feet, drawing attention to their hidden adornments. Turn to Allah in repentance all together, O believers, so that you may be successful. [Surah An-Noor 24:31] Surah An-Noor [24:60] The verse below was also revealed that the outer garment (e.g. a cloak) has been made optional for older Muslim women whose menstrual cycle has ended and hence have passed their age for marriage and childbearing. Although the first part of the ayah states that older women are not required to wear the hijab (in this ayah, outer garment implies the hijab), the second part of the ayah further explains that it is better for them to continue wearing the Hijab even at an old age because Allah knows what we do not. When Allah Moved the Earth to Forgive His Servant POPULAR When Allah Moved the Earth to Forgive His Servant وَٱلْقَوَٰعِدُ مِنَ ٱلنِّسَآءِ ٱلَّـٰتِى لَا يَرْجُونَ نِكَاحًۭا فَلَيْسَ عَلَيْهِنَّ جُنَاحٌ أَن يَضَعْنَ ثِيَابَهُنَّ غَيْرَ مُتَبَرِّجَـٰتٍۭ بِزِينَةٍۢ ۖ وَأَن يَسْتَعْفِفْنَ خَيْرٌۭ لَّهُنَّ ۗ وَٱللَّهُ سَمِيعٌ عَلِيمٌۭ As for elderly women past the age of marriage, there is no blame on them if they take off their ˹outer˺ garments, without revealing their adornments. But it is better for them if they avoid this ˹altogether˺. And Allah is All-Hearing, All-Knowing. [An-Noor 24:60] Hadith About Hijab In order to gain a complete understanding of the above Quranic verses, it is important to seek the Prophet’s (PBUH) explanation synonymously, as Allah has revealed in Surah An-Naml [16:44]. A number of narrations are available with regard to the Hijab: Hadith On Hijab Narrated Safiya bint Shaiba: Aisha used to say: “When (the verse): “They should draw their veils over their necks and bosoms…,” was revealed, (the ladies) cut their waist sheets at the edges and covered their heads and faces with those cut pieces of cloth.” [Sahih Al-Bukhari] The Hadith above shows that the believing women of the time understood the verse as stated above (Surah An-Noor 24:31) and were quick to follow. It shows beyond doubt that it was not a cultural practice, otherwise they would not have had to cut pieces of cloth to cover their bodies as prescribed. This Hadith specifically mentions that they veiled their heads as well as their faces - referring to the Hijab. Although women are not required to follow this dress code when they are at home in the absence of adult men who are not related to them (or their husbands), women are also required to follow this dress code when performing their prayers as stated in the following Hadith. Ayesha (RA) narrated that: Allah’s Messenger said: “The Salat of a women who has reached the age of menstruation is not accepted without a Khimar” [Jami’ at-Tirmidhi 377] Hadith On Hijab And Modesty Of Clothing Allah’s Messenger (PBUH) used to offer the Fajr prayer and some believing women, covered with their veiling sheets, used to attend the Fajr prayer with him and then they would return to their homes unrecognized. [Sahih Al-Bukhari] Narrated Aisha: Umar bin Al-Khattab used to say to Allah’s Messenger (PBUH) “Let your wives be veiled” But he did not do so. The wives of the Prophet (PBUH) used to go out to answer the call of nature at night only at Al-Manasi. Once Sauda, the daughter of Zama (a wife of the Messenger of Allah PBUH), went out and she was a tall woman. Umar bin Al-Khattab saw her while he was in a gathering, and said, “I have recognized you, O Sauda!” He (Umar) said so as he was anxious for some Divine orders regarding the veil (the veiling of women.) So Allah revealed the verse of veiling. [Sahih Al-Bukhari] These Sahih AHadeeth point to the practice of the early Muslim women dressing modestly so as to not reveal their figure. They maintained modesty in their clothing to such a degree that those around could not recognize who they were.

[@heg1098]

"My interpretation is totally objective and but yours is subjective, for an agenda" How convenient for Mr hijab

[@moezrr8046]

@TheImpactfulScholar - What was the name you mentioned at 8:35? The captions says "Sake Hussein" but I find no results of that on Google. Neither can I make out what you've said to accurately determine the scholar's name. If anybody knows, it would be appreciated!

[@DrJavadTHashmi]

Professor Saqib Hussain at LMU

[@fatimaabdullahi6604]

This is really refreshing! The more I watch your videos , the more i fall in love with the channel. Such a brilliant mind. Would love to see you debate Mohammed Hijab.

[@SomeofThisSomeofThat]

Hashmi you are being disingenuous. “what’d you think of the ayat” is an important question because the ayat was at issue. If the lady in the crowd knew of an alternative understanding, as you assume Hijab did, she couldve said as much. She knows one understanding of the ayat, believes it is from Alla (swt) and still takes issue with it. What he did was demonstrate that some western women will prioritize feminism over the word of Allah (swt).

[@neveroddnoreven1553]

I haven't seen this side of Hijab. Given he did an ep with Sneako, I'm unsure of the path he's headed on

[@purnp5897]

Facts. I said it years ago hes a thug.

[@michaelmalzahn-tx2zi]

strange hijab would be lecturing in such an environment. i see women sitting next to men.

[@M_A_R_I_A_M399_5]

Agree with you 100%

[@salmaomar8466]

Mohammed Hijab and Ali Dawah are the worst. I can't believe I just came cross your channel. i had given up on watching Islamic lectures. You are a breath of fresh air.

[@GeloThaTopBoy]

Man, I was ready to leave because the when I read the Quran I don’t see the things I’m being taught

[@IMHS21]

The Quran is abandoned by the majority ​@@GeloThaTopBoy

[@GeloThaTopBoy]

It’s daunting tbh because I know how born Muslim can be I don’t believe all Hadith should be just thrown out but be skeptical

[@IMHS21]

@@GeloThaTopBoy 👍 , anything that matches with the Quran you could accept. Any ruling that doesn't cannot be accepted

[@dustonpath]

Thanks for exposing bad apples!

[@dr_logical_b3a5t63]

Hijab is a smart man who can debate and defend islam but unfortunately that red pill behaviour withern himself does more harm to the islamic image than enlighten it

[@Dimas451]

I think you'd be the right guy to debate with David Wood or Ap.

[@1eV]

Doesn't your last sentence imply that women cannot be at the level of men's debating level?

[@M_A_R_I_A_M399_5]

ما شاء الله

[@zeerakkhan1610]

You should have a public or private discussion with Hijab and challenge him directly. I think people would be interested in that

[@SilentEmpires]

He wouldn't dare because Hijab would wipe the floor with this apologist sellout without much effort. And am not a fan of Mohamed Hijab

[@ankhmorpok1497]

@@SilentEmpires Hijab can't defend himself when put on the spot. He attacks the man not the ideas. Hijab is just a cheap rabble rouser.

[@deeznutz1428]

@@SilentEmpires imagine how dumb a person has to be to think hijab can defend anything against javad...akh right bro fanboys are the rotten apple of muslim community and pretty sure thry will support hijab doesnt matter how bad his takes are. same with ali dawah and daniel. these clown completely destroyed islams image on social media.

[@homer1273]

⁠@@SilentEmpires hijab only looks intelligent to his 18 year old incel followers

[@dodgysmum8340]

This guy ❤️ s excommunicating people. He missed his calling as he wld hv been a great counter-reformation Pope. I think he especially enjoys takfiring women he sees as too masculine, although he will of course claim any men picks on are too effeminate… In fact I believe he has done it to you.

[@shahidilhan3139]

For the algo !

[@BeNGALi4LFE]

We need more voices against the Akh Right as well the Islamophobes that credit the Akh Right with being the sole ambassadors of the religion.

[@wanabisufi8843]

I have mixed feelings about Mohammad hijab. For instance the video your commenting on, I think Hijab makes a powerful case about some flaws in feminist conclusions. THe problem is, as you have pointed out Javed, that he is declaring takfir and mocking a woman.

[@bradchilders5546]

the subtitles have me cracking up, @ 4:12 "you will have your chance, nazi era"

[@DrJavadTHashmi]

Yeah we gotta improve those. :(

[@funaholica]

Bro debate him if you can!

[@DrJavadTHashmi]

He is too scared.

[@funaholica]

I’ll arrange it, if you’re ready, I’ll be honest with you he never backed down from any debate!

[@DrJavadTHashmi]

​@@funaholica Sure, I am of course ready. As long as we find a suitable topic, I am ready and willing. After all, I challenged him in this very video. It would look bad on him if he is willing to takfīr me but not debate me.

[@funaholica]

@@DrJavadTHashmi you’re 100% right on this, if he replies he should not kaffir you, and we should know your beliefs to find a good topic, are you an atheist, Christian, Hindu, it depends!

[@funaholica]

Wait I apologize, I just read the description page on your channel!

[@irfansheikh3046]

Did you see his recent antics in Norway? Instead of removing misconceptions those ignorant people have, he is going there reinforcing them.

[@TalkTheology]

Good reaction video! 🤩

[@DrJavadTHashmi]

Thank you!! 😁

[@negeto2460]

Great video brother.

[@CoffeePaladin]

Not that she was laughing at the Qur'an, I'd wager. So if you laugh at the Qur'an, you're a kafir. But it is God who causes us to laugh, he said so in the Qur'an. Was Sarah, the wife of Abraham, a kafir when she laughed at God's divine speech? What a stupid idea. That kind of closed mindedness could only come from someone who has such a narrow, suffocating view of the creator.

[@jgkkvkddjjfgfjgr]

@ 6:48 "They will try and interpret those verses which are ambiguous to suit their own agenda" Doesn't this allegation apply to those who are self proclaimed preservers of faith as well. How do you know who is running an agenda and who isn't, irrespective of the person's background ?

[@mustafanaeem1222]

Can you please do a video refuting the islamoskeptic theory that Mecca was Petra. That would be amazing.

[@DrJavadTHashmi]

OK, thanks -- I'll plan to do that ... eventually!

[@MWFUKING3]

it really isn't skeptical. It is just arabic, really did start in and around petra

[@iiddrrii6051]

@@DrJavadTHashmithat would be interesting

[@Gabriel-ServantOfGod]

That theory makes sense, of course Dav Gibson is not a muslim and he kinda throws at the Qur'an assuming it was changed, i obviously don't believe that, and neither has he any concrete evidence for that claim, the verse about the change in direction can be easily interpreted to mean the change in direction the Prophet had, which any revert also had. The word Qibla just means direction, in some context that implies destination, and in others your goals and focus. It has nothing to do with prayer, necessarily... The Qur'an also mentions many things about the city the Prophet warned, none of which apply to today's "Mecca" but do apply to Petra. Also noteworthy, Petra was "casually" having an earthqacke shortly after the people rejected the messenger, as the Qur'an does mention the original people he preached to were bound to disbelief... only in the later place the people believed in mass... And sunnatallah does not change, if people reject the messenger, they get destroyed, buildings included... And that's what happened, Petra being the mother of cities the Prophet warned is actually a proof of Islam, the Qur'an being revelation... It is a proof, of course, it does kinda debunk the Sectarians claims, and all their stuff they are doing kissing idols or bowing down to a cube, which is nowhere in the Qur'an... And idk, it sounds crazy, but at the same time it is kinda sad. The true Masjid al Haram is meant to show us the stance of Abraham... and when i saw Petra, man that place has something to it... It's a shame people don't go there to see the signs... Altough i do believe 9:28 forbids us, but the reason is that the place was full of associators who were unclean... since they were destroyed, perhaps we can visit it now... God knows best. يَـٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوٓا۟ إِنَّمَا ٱلْمُشْرِكُونَ نَجَسٌ فَلَا يَقْرَبُوا۟ ٱلْمَسْجِدَ ٱلْحَرَامَ بَعْدَ عَامِهِمْ هَـٰذَا وَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ عَيْلَةً فَسَوْفَ يُغْنِيكُمُ ٱللَّـهُ مِن فَضْلِهِۦٓ إِن شَآءَ إِنَّ ٱللَّـهَ عَلِيمٌ حَكِيمٌ O you who heed warning: those who ascribe a partnership are unclean; so approach not the inviolable place of worship after this their year. And if you fear poverty, then will God enrich you out of His bounty, if He wills; God is knowing and wise. (9:28) This is from brother Sam's Gerrans, i know it's controversial. But if be the truth, Alhamdulillah, i'm happy either way as long as i understand the Qur'an.

[@ummerfarooq5383]

Nashuz doesnt just mean infidelity, it means rising in a woman. That same ayah is how I feel the prophet got the idea that males and females children should be seperated from sleeping together after a certain age. Because sexuality arises in the child as it becomes adolescent. Also in societies where a woman rises, above mens height, we have examples such as the pole dancer, the japanese female idol, the animal kingdom where the female is larger and the males smaller, the wodaabe tribe where the males wear makeup and the females choose multiple males. These are not societies for cities.

[@kawsartushar1658]

Another Burger scholar…😅

[@florisnoor2539]

spot on!

[@wahdat-al-wujud]

Neo-Athari would be a more accurate term, Hijab did a whole video on his journey through salafism, which was refreshing actually, but he’s still got Salafi vibes - or right wing fascist about Islam vibes, if that fits. As a perennialist/universalist I would love to debate Hijab, I think I would decimate him tbh; but from the Muslim side, if you were to debate him, it would give a huge breath of fresh air to the conversation. Asalaamu alaykum.

[@DrJavadTHashmi]

You're right. I meant to say "neo-Athari." Also, I am a Muslim religious pluralist myself.

[@wahdat-al-wujud]

I know you are a pluralist! Im grateful for you and others like Dr Khalil Andani, Seyyed Hossein Nasir and even though he’s not a perennialist, Shaykh Hamza Yusuf; so many others even. I know in Pakistan, Javed Ghamidi has made some waves and I’m grateful for Mufti Abu Layth; anyone that thrives on the rational and mystical schools gives hope to the future of Islam.

[@murtazashafiq6807]

@@DrJavadTHashmi What do you intend by pluralist?

[@giannisgeorgiadis1887]

@@DrJavadTHashmi Mohammed hijab has the ideology off muslim brotherhood supports deviant scholars but slanders salafis the ulama off sunnah like Sheikh al albani and praised Sheikh al dedew

[@dom3073]

@@wahdat-al-wujud you decimate Hijab. lol arent you now a hindu? Cmon youd take a huge L.

[@criticalrationalism975]

Thank you for standing up to this bully.

[@IndependentIslamicRepublic]

Yet they interpret it the way they like 😌

[@bigtombowski]

Javid, do something about your freaky eyes thanks

[@noorahamid3376]

Thankyou for all your efforts and courage!

[@DrJavadTHashmi]

Thank you!

[@hazard1219]

❤️❤️❤️

[@imp9142]

They just rebranded after wahabis got a bad rep. Thank you for exposing that

[@KeskinCookin]

It's a pleasure to watch and learn from your videos.

[@DrJavadTHashmi]

Thank you so much!

[@dailydua6168]

This javed reformist

[@eljefe4300]

A lot of todays youth has become like hijab sadly, even the barber i go to who was relatively normal a couple years ago

[@previewbrah]

Hey, do you have discord?

[@emra5678]

I do not see that Hijab said anything wrong

[@ahassan05]

I say this as a sincere advice to you (whose views I respect greatly): In the future…I think you could do without the name calling. I agreed wholeheartedly with your points in this video, but disagree when you referred to him as a “thug”

[@kingvegetakinggoku2008]

You need to make more reaction videos to these UK Dawah group since they have very large audiences and make these large claims

[@LeanOnPlants]

… and don’t we Brits know it 🤦🏻‍♀️ London is rife with these men.

[@زينب44]

They've had carte blanche for long enough. Can't stand them.

[@temurdurrani6926]

@MohammedHijab

[@jakeawad2531]

It's high time you and Hijab have a debate

[@Dawat-E-Ghurba]

Hijab will annihilate this so called scholar

[@taym2720]

@@Dawat-E-Ghurba This guy sounds like a desi dayouth from his voice. A couple of Pathan bros will fix him up LMFAO

[@everyzan-m2q]

@@Dawat-E-Ghurba Hijab is literally a fake scholar

[@jakeawad2531]

@@Dawat-E-Ghurba I doubt it. They're both very smart, I suspect an intelligent conversation

[@ummerfarooq5383]

Laughing at another person is a violation of quran 23:110, it's what differentiates the yokel masses (quran 49:14) and the muminoon (securers). Note the duck/chicken toy test given to police trainees. Al-Mu'minun 23:110 فَٱتَّخَذْتُمُوهُمْ سِخْرِيًّا حَتَّىٰٓ أَنسَوْكُمْ ذِكْرِى وَكُنتُم مِّنْهُمْ تَضْحَكُونَ But you took them in mockery to the point that they made you forget my remembrance, and you used to laugh at them.

[@muhammadishaq7358]

😅😅😅😅

[@mri8517]

Is this not a britich speakers corner type stuff?

[@ahmedmohammad7300]

Need more of your views on different issues muslims are facing.

[@DrJavadTHashmi]

Thank you. I plan on it!

[@DeadstockDownsouth]

Thank you so much sir. When i discovered these religious battles guys like Muhammad Hijab, Sheikh Uthman, David Wood ect.. When I discovered this I thought what is the point of this? Why dont people just have their faith and leave the others alone. Guys like you and Bart Erhman are such a breath of fresh air. We need you guys to expose every single one of these tactics and lies these guys use. I hope one day soon the internet will be educated to identify these guys and their agenda.

[@DeadstockDownsouth]

@@Billy-t3c Yep you couldnt have said it any better.. I like guys like Sam and David, but what they do speaking about Islam in this way is such a dis service to us.

[@DeadstockDownsouth]

@@Billy-t3c Yeah I agree. Look i support Israel and Jews in general but if you ask me to look past the talmud i say no. Doing the right thing requires complete honesty not selective honesty.

[@lmlmd2714]

I just found this, and I like it.

[@usmanuddin1366]

defend ma lady shining knight.

[@Ajstar584]

This was refreshing to hear thank you

[@Hunzilla1098]

Great video Dr. Hashmi! Also, I was wondering if you were familiar with Ghulam Ahmed Perwez, his ideas and books are sadly rather unknown among Muslims and non-Muslims alike. The immense scope of his writings and insights are groundbreaking and created a new field of Muslim thought. Parwez's view of God is seeing Him/It as the Absolute, Absolute in everything from Power to Goodness, that created and uses the universe as Its self-expression, and put life into the universe as part of Its creativity and love. It guides the development of the universe towards complexity, and does the same to mankind's consciousness by guiding it through Revelation. As the Qur'an sees itself as the last revelation, it means Mankind is finally mature enough to stand on their own feet. Parwez views the universe as one giant process of evolution, following the Will of God. And this process is beautiful, and although a powerful process, it's purpose is not to be a show of power but of mercy (which is why God calls Himself ar-Rahman and ar-Raheem, the provider of Rahma, mercy and providence). Thus Parwez views God not as a dictator, unreachable and impersonal. God can be approached, but He works through the laws of the universe, and thus we approach God by following the laws in the evolution of the universe and ourselves. We understand God through the universe which expresses His Will. "If Iqbal has had any successor on the intellectual plane, it is undoubtedly Allama Ghulam Ahmad Parwez. What the great poet-philosopher had to say pithily and almost aphoristically, Parwez has expatiated upon, writing as eloquently as Abu-ul-Kalam Azad and documenting it as authentically as Maulana Suleman Nadvi. That is, however, true only so far as the style goes. Analytically he has no compeer amongst the modern writers on Islam. One is simply staggered with the inexhaustibility of his erudition which spans all the gamut of human knowledge; philosophy, science, anthropology, history, philology, economics and other fields of research. Allama Parwez is surely one of the most learned men of our times. But he is not a mere walking encyclopaedia. All this equipment of his is there in an ordered, systematic form; streamlined, so to say according to a highly sophisticated point of view which is derived from the Holy Quran. Allama Ghulam Ahmad Parwez is the Hazrat Shah Waliullah of our age." - An excerpt of a review for his book Kitab-ul-Taqdeer (or the Book of Destiny).

[@DrJavadTHashmi]

Thank you for this comment. Yes, I have read Pervez before. He is an interesting figure with lots of good insights.

[@Hunzilla1098]

@@DrJavadTHashmi Most definitely, to be honest I think that without him I might be an atheist right now rather than a Muslim who is experiencing an intensification of faith after lapsing/being an ex-Muslim for a long time. Are there any other scholars in the same vein that you would recommend for study and/or general reading? The only ones I'm currently aware of are Iqbal, Dr. Syed Abdul Wadud, Dr. Shabbir Ahmad & brother Arnold Yasin Mol who wrote a fascinating article on Quranic Cosmology; here's the link if you're interested in reading it, personally my eimaan increased after finishing it: ebooks.rahnuma.org/religion/Arnold.Yasin.Mol/Arnold.Yasin.Mol_Quranic-Cosmology-A-modern-introduction.pdf

[@Abumaryam22]

The truth shall manifest insha Allah against the corrupters of interpretation Thank brother for your good job and creating awareness ❤️

[@DrJavadTHashmi]

Thank you.

[@rolandboston48774]

On fire, Doctor !! 🔥🔥

[@thetruth27786]

You explain it same as nouman ali khan...May Allah swt grant you jannah....Allah loves you dont ever stop teaching

[@junayedmustofaghalib4683]

Sister, do you believe in the hadith traditions of our prophet Muhammad (saw) like Sahih Bukhari, Muslim and the likes?

[@TwinofIcarus]

​@Junayed Mustofa Ghalib the hadiths are in agreedment. The rights of husband and wife as explicitly stated. And the right of husband is the woman not allowing anyone to his house, in his bed, etc. According to sahih bukhari.

[@junayedmustofaghalib4683]

@@TwinofIcarus Yes but the man who made this video does not believe in the Hadith collection. He is not academically reliable.

[@junayedmustofaghalib4683]

@@Girlzilla-editsyt If content of the hadith is not credible, why would we extend the same gesture for the Qur'an. Could not the Qur'an be not credible? If not, then what infallible methodology is used to preserve the Qur'an?

[@criticalrationalism975]

He will never debate you. Your eyes will scare him away 😂

[@SilentEmpires]

@farid responds

[@dedoyxp]

While I agree with some of your idea about quran. I don't think you should post a video like this. Just keep focus on quran.

[@ThatRandomGuy-wd7rw]

Even though I personally take the traditionalist patriarchal view when it comes to this verse, I also didn't like the way Hijab mocked her and almost takfired her immediately for not agreeing with his interpretation. Good reaction video.

[@MM2Pearl17]

May Allah subhanawatallah increase you in Quran’s knowledge!

[@ramodemmahom8905]

Is not your own interpretation contingent?

[@DrJavadTHashmi]

I indicated so in the video, no?

[@javiddar6460]

If u have guts then challenge him for debate.....he is a big giant Mohammad hijab

[@DrJavadTHashmi]

Daniel first, then Mo Hijab.

[@SJ-yd6zi]

​@@DrJavadTHashmi Looking at your performance in the debate with Daniel, Hijab would be able to devour you like a bite size candy.

[@phiuzu5487]

​​@@DrJavadTHashmii initially thought you were illogical since i thought i was familiar with daniel and when seeing the title his biased video on his channel i thought he was in the right but after a certain period of time i watched your video with mufti abu layth which opened my interest to watch your debate with daniel. I haven't finished it entirely but i was shocked when seeing it since i saw how disgusting and evil daniel was when you brought up his tweets which i was really shocked by since i didn't entirely know he was that disgusting and that you brilliantly argued for your position and provided great evidence including the way you did it. Thank you immensely for standing up to your faith and defending what is right, good against evil. It also justified the hatred within me towards medieval scholars on sex slavery. mufti abu layth made a video on hypocrisy within such scholars on the awrah of free and slave women which i watched wmd became aware but the evidence you provided deepened the hatred further. Must say truly disgusting. Thank you for destroying the filth that daniel justifies.

[@ace9924]

Javad would crush him in a debate. Hijab will bring some obscure hadith and Javad will counter it with the Quran.

[@rublar75]

That was quick & it's dishonest of you. Not open to anything that opposes you even if I give all the resources. God bless you brother.