Beta Decay

[@shachiojha9820]

Sir...U understand the basics concepts to set up in students's mind to make them make understand the idea u deliver and a proper way to deal with those topics......I'm thanking u tobring my interest back on physics. Ur really a gud teacher......

[@aaliyahtho9470]

Will forever be thankful for these videos. Absolutely amazing!

[@malz230]

thank you so much for the videos. your style of lecturing is so clear, your words are engraved on my brain.

[@AKLECTURES]

awesome! glad to hear that :-)

[@yashkhurana3546]

AK LECTURES

[@imrankhanimrankahn3220]

Sir u have given full concept....u are wonderful ,best teacher...but why ur videos are too old..b.coz ur videos are very fantastic..so we also need it now....

[@krish2nasa]

In the beta decay, does this emitted electron be recaptured by the new proton from the nucleus?

[@zivhome]

Question? If the decay convert n->p, it means the new daughter atom has extra +1 charge, so the new mass after decay should be less by one electron -1e. just 1.007276u instead of 1.00782458u?

[@animals42life8]

"the sum of the parts is greater than the whole" like in other decay. But in your example its the opposite, can you help me enlighten? Thanks!

[@kiranneog5653]

Thanks s

[@gregmonks9708]

I don't buy it. The bond between quarks is incredibly strong. That they would give up an electron so easily and turn into a proton seems fishy to me. My impression is that the production of particles such as electrons is an attribution rather than actual evidence. Either that or the underlying mechanism isn't properly understood. Electrons are shells that stick to nuclei. Claiming they are part of those nuclei is a contradiction in terms. That is, unless the quark model is incorrect.

[@QuangNguyen-yb8lv]

1.008665 - 1.00782458 = 0.00084042