2014 / 2015 Subaru Forester XT Detailed Review and Road Test

Is the Subaru Forester the right crossover right for you? Check out the most detailed review on KZbin to find out.
Check out the new Honda HR-V: • 2016 Honda HR-V Crosso...
Be sure to LIKE this video! Liking and subscribing help AOA get access to cars!
More videos: goo.gl/Kj1FlI
Alex's Favorite Cars: goo.gl/uGSNLI
The Best Cars, Trucks & SUVs: • The A List - The Best ...
Want a free AoA sticker? Send a self-addressed stamped envelope (no stamp, no sticker) to:
DykLaine, LLC
Alex On Autos
PO Box 573
Redwood Estates, CA 95044
AOA on Facebook: goo.gl/a47Cu1
Statistics powered by ChannelMeter channelmeter.com

[@308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane]

By far the most comprehensive review of the Forester I've seen. CVT+turbo is awesome, it makes the engine pull like a diesel, but with the rev range of a gasoline engine. Great that you hammer in the point that Full Time AWD is ALWAYS better than slip and grab systems.

[@h1017412]

Agreed - very useful, detailed analysis.

[@chrisrefaei]

I just got my 2013 Forester with 64k miles on the clock. I absolutely love it. I smile from ear to ear driving. It's such a sleeper car that's has so much practicality and when you give it the beans it Goooes!

[@sonsoftheedelweiss72]

Purchased a Forester automatic non turbo month or so ago and I love it. The ride is awesome, feels like a gecko lizard hugging the road, decently comfortable, low noise and good pickup ( contrary to what I have read mostly). And I personally love the way it handles and looks. Only drawback is stereo system, but I can easily live with that. I highly recommend.

[@aquateen77723]

Great job, Alex. I don't know of any other auto journalist that is more thorough and in-depth as you. This is a pretty compelling choice for an AWD crossover with a dash of fun thrown in.

[@ronaldov09]

Bought the XT after test driving most vehicles in this segment. CX5 2.5L and Tuscon 1.6T made up the top 3 choices....all great cars. Only need to spend minimal dollars (front and rear sway bar upgrades) to get it handling a lot better. Also the the engine is de-tuned and it is easy to get much more power out of it. Definitely not as good looking as the Mazda and Hyundai. Great thorough review.

[@1218omaroo]

I own an XT and found this to be the most accurate and by far the most objective review on KZbin. Well done Alex, a worthy watch.

[@dlee9924]

This was a really good review of this car. I have the 2014/ 2.5i base model with some extras, and I love this vehicle. I am a little over 20,000 miles and it has only been a little under 10 months, and this is the best car for all the driving that I do daily, and for traveling. I wish I would have seen this video before I bought my car, it would have made the choice all the more easier. I will also say that the AWD option on this car in snow when it gets to 7 to 10 inches with ice, is EXCELLENT! Kudos to you Alex this is the best review of the Forester that I have found.

[@HankDCFC]

Hi Alex, Thanks for another great video. I've owned a 2014 Forester XT Touring for almost a year now and it's been flawless, by far the best vehicle I've ever owned. The gas mileage is 28mpg over the 13000 miles I've driven it on standard 87 octane gas, which it says it can use and it does so just fine.

[@jakob3993]

Any consideration for updating for a 2017 Forester XT review? It seems you have more up to date reviews of most other vehicles in the Subaru line up, but the Forester has been ignored for 2 years now and could potentially need a more up to date review to remain relevant for today's buyers. So many options in the segment: RAV4, CR-V, Rogue, CX-5, Escape. I test drove the RAV4 hybrid, CR-V and the Forester XT recently and I loved the power of the XT though the interior is definitely spartan. I liked the outward visibility and the low belt line of the windows. With that alone, I feel like alot of the safety features were unnecessary besides rear camera and blind spot monitoring. Something that may be interesting to other viewers. I recently also inquired with my insurance company wether adding Eyesight safety lowers my rates. It lowered my liability rate, but increased my collision rate more, so in total my insurance expense increases with added safety tech. Explained to me by my agent that safety tech is expensive to replace though they decrease your own risk of collision, most collisions occur due to the opposing driver.

[@execlipse7620]

Jakob 3 i own a forester xt 2016 its engine throttle response and shift is good even with a cvt here in the philippines it can defeat all ford chevy toyota suvs like everest trailblazer and fortunercin a freeway its good wen you stepped at the gas immediately accelerates :)

[@execlipse7620]

Meanwhile our forester does not have eyesight and blind spot And parking sensor on front and inline features like the new Everest's and trailblazers

[@arkadianriver]

Yep.. also looking forward to a more up-to-date review if you can get your hands on it :D

[@combcomclrlsr]

Hey, lowering the center of gravity isn't just for off-roading. A lower center of gravity helps reduce the chance of rollover on the road, too.

[@georgek2031]

Excellent review -- thanks! I've viewed just about every Forester review on KZbin, and this one was the most comprehensive.

[@TREPTILE]

Great review Alex. Been waiting for this for a year and glad you finally were able to review it, even though I have already purchased my 2014 Forester XT. I agree with pretty much all you comments on this model, and I've loved my Forester after about a year of ownership. Everyone should definitely test drive one if they are looking for a compact crossover.

[@snow_monkey]

it's a shame that the XT isn't available with a manual gearbox.

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

David, for some reason I wasn't able to reply directly to your comment. Subaru says that there have been changes to address the issue but it is too early to say if the problem has been solved or not. 1 quart of oil consumption per 5,000 miles isn't terribly rare, but owners were reporting more than that. The drive toward efficiency and low friction piston rings and thinner coils could be to blame, but again it is hard to say. I assume we will know more this year about the outcome of the oil consumption law suits and any design tweaks.

[@LoquiYo]

Alex on Autos I have the 2.5 Impreza 2011 with 94k miles as the daily conmuter car, changing oil every 8k (Penzoil syntetic)and no oil added between changes. Due to the good reliability I added a Forester 2013 as a family car and my daughter have a 2013 XV to go college.. Risky to have 3 cars of the same brand but no problems so far. I will need another car for other high school-er going to college too, So I"m in research for another good deal

[@LoquiYo]

Jose F Zayas I live in a tropical weather, 75 to 95 F. I use 10W30 oil without adding oil between service 8k miles. Maybe people that use 0/5w oil for cold weather in the snow belt are having different results. I seen problems like that with vehicles coming from cold weather.

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

Jose F Zayas In general the lighter the oil, the more any car will consume.

[@mountainhobo]

+Alex on Autos "I assume we will know more this year" -- Any news on the subject, Alex?

[@alvilla701]

Alex you said that you prefer the subaru over the Cherokee trailhawk but what about the Cherokee limited V6 with the active drive II

[@andreib7628]

Alex, I really enjoy your reviews. They are very informative, thorough and accurate. However I would like to point out one error in this review: in case of this and most Subaru 5 and 6-speed manual transmissions the AWD system has an actual center differential with a 50/50% torque split and a viscous limited slip device, not just a viscous coupling (except the STI versions that have an electronic limited slip differential with more rear torque bias). The manual transmission option offers a true full-time AWD system that will transmit torque to both axles equally all the time while still being able to differentiate during turns and not overheat during extended hard driving on slippery surfaces. This is key for performance handling and is what truly sets the manual option apart from the run-of-the-mill torque transfer clutch based AWD systems as found in the Subaru CVT option and from most other competitors.

[@rmfrick91]

This review is above the rest. Very good! Very professional. I was more impressed with the reviewers detail than any other reviewer on KZbin!

[@Chillmax]

Just saw the Forester up against the Jeep Cherokee and many other mid SUV's in a 4x4 challenge, hill climb, muddy terrain etc, the Forester walked all over the Jeep and the rest of them!!!

[@25gwolfable]

you're one of the best journalist I've seen so far I too have a Subaru Forester 2014 I love it and thanks to you became the best choice I've made thank you

[@Icriedtoday]

You know guy, you have given the most informative and best auto review I've ever seen--in any format. Thanks.

[@nickhoward316]

Love your reviews. Always very informative. I've been eyeing the forester for sometime but am also considering the rav4. I've noticed that this video is a bit outdated and seems to be using an older ranking system. For instance, the seats were rated a 7/10 in this video and that the felt better than the rav4. But in a newer, 2016 rav4 video, the rav4 received a 9/10 in seats. I didn't see a difference in seat designs though. So i was wondering if the forester would ever be reviewed again in the near future for better cross shoping/comparing? Thanks!

[@pcango8694]

It's one of the best reviews so far!

[@nexlvlcrm]

Best reviewer on yt

[@MrAbhijyot]

Hi i am buying a Forester XT and waswondering if the extended warranty is worth the extra 2k ?

[@marinoint]

Finally Subaru, you handed over the Forester to the best car reviewer in the world! Please let him review your 2015 WRX and Outback too!

[@howardthegasman]

Now that's a proper thorough and informative review. So much better than the rest. Well done.

[@ministerfoust]

By far the best review I've seen so far. I bought the 2015 XT with Eyesight a few months ago and am quite happy with it. I agree with Alex that the seats could be a little more comfortable but I can live with it. A little more bolstering would be nice and the engine noise in the cabin is not that bad, but then I did get the undercoating which tends to muffle the sound a bit. The rear camera display is projected on the small info. screen on the dash but Forester windows are so big that rear and side visibility is excellent.

[@halooche]

One of the best reviews I’ve watched, thank you.

[@vmsenthilkumar]

Hi Alex, Any chances for 2016 Forester review ? BTW I love the detailed reviews on your channel

[@qtvo]

Awesome review! Definitely the most informative one on the net right now IMO!

[@King_Kenny66]

Great video Alex! I can attest to the head and leg room, it's very generous. The driver's seat bottom felt short and I couldn't get comfy. On the highway, the steering felt really touchy and I had a hard time keeping it centered in the lane. And lastly, it was extremely noisy inside the vehicle. Otherwise, I like it, lol!

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

The steering feel is largely down to the tires. If the forester had lower aspect ratio rubber it would feel more connected, but then you'd lose some of the soft-road ability.

[@308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane]

Subaru dealers always keep their tires hugely over inflated for some reason. Check to see if it's at the recommended level and try again.

[@cannonphodder]

Alex on Autos well the 2014/2015 forester just switched to an electronic instead of a mechanical system(no power steering fluid). the common denominator with these electronic systems is less "feel". the XT model runs on 225/55HR18 rubber so that's a pretty nice middle ground for handling and ride quality.

[@mowog1000]

Great video, nice info given, just got a '15 for the wife, she does stupid miles and like the great view from the car, I wanted her to get a cx5 but after driving the forester about 10 minutes later I was really surprised, what a good allround car/truck this thing is. do not need to techno inftainment so it is not a problem, my biggest concern was the cvt..... not bad really for what she is going to use it for, and the awd drive is better than all the rest, great for our Canadian winters

[@revengefullobster4524]

Great review! We just bought an XT so I'm excited to see how it compares to what you have said. You review is definitely one of the best and most informative on this model. Thanks!

[@wesrazz5874]

You do the best reviews. Thanks for what you do.

[@Edmeade1]

I like the Forester and I'm planning on buying one but I have a few gripes with it. The infotainment system is outdated and the seats are not as comfortable as the 2015 Outback. The forester is making tremendous sales, but giving it the outback interior treatment would make it even better!

[@Tc-ev9dd]

I heard these cars are great cars. I'm actually interested in a legacy, Impreza and a forestor. Are they really reliable. I do a great job taking care of my vehicles changing fuel filter oil changes, oil filters and air filters. Also do my radiator flushes after a certain amount of mileage. front and rear differential oil changes, tire rotations and buy extra brand new tires. Is maintenance on par or is it alittle bit more expensive then regular cars?

[@baldheadlogic]

Great Review Alex! Keep them coming. I like the Forester but I agree that the interior is low rent next to some of its competitors.

[@rmcmilla100]

Good job on the review, you create the best positive image for the auto any manufacturer could hope for by clearly stating the facts and making comparisons to the competitors. Thanks for all the extra informational videos explaining different aspects/systems of the car being reviewed. I was pleasantly surprised to see how zippy the XT is. Thanks again.

[@omarkharnivall2439]

nice review, thanks! i love when ppl show all the comfort features like telescopic steering wheel and reclining seats for the back

[@bird271828]

Alex, thank you for this review and all your other reviews.

[@jmw882a5]

Looking to purchase a Volvo XC60 E drive (2016) for my wife, but then I saw the new Kia Sorento, and the Subaru Forester. Family of 4 (wife-5'5", teen-5'6", Cat-20", and me-6'3"), moving to St. Louis area. Which do you recommend of these autos of different classes?

[@gsctht123]

Great review! Love to hear someone mention the Outback compared to any of these vehicles tho and not just wagons.

[@panama-canada]

Good comprehensive review. Keep up the good job.

[@islandgirl103]

Nice review Alex. Do you think the 2.5 non-turbo engine is a better value than the Forester XT? Also, I echo the others who hope you will be reviewing the 2015 Outback.

[@slandshark]

Only 10% of foresters sold in the U.S. are the XT model. I wish you could do a review on the 2.5i instead, which are wildly more popular. You're reviews are awesome, btw.

[@krisnadiimam1509]

+slandshark : if u have the money to spend... the turbo is a much much much better car than the 2.5 its just that good...

[@Lukos0036]

Very comprehensive review. Well done.

[@stephanematis]

Thanks for a good review Alex. I will be test-driving an XT shortly and hoped that cabin noise levels would be a little more subdued.

[@killersushi99]

I love my 2014 XT. Its a great ride!!!

[@Kiss__Kiss]

Do you still have your Forester?

[@sabz4321]

Thanks for the great review. Please comment on comparing Outback vs Forester if possible (better yet do a separate review). 2015 Outback sounds like a great competition for the Forester.

[@edwardlaw797]

Forester is more capable offroad... Outback is quieter, smoother more refined has memory seats. Forecaster is cheaper in all trims except xt trim, it has a tuned down wrx engine & excellent suspension...

[@zaitcev0]

Thanks for getting around to Forester. It intrigues me, together with hachiroku, but that review didn't add any new information to what I knew already, while this one does, in particular about drivetrain and I-sight cameras. My biggest problem with Forester at this point is its lack of low range. Having tasted it, I don't want to go back. In addition, it's getting too big. I suppose there's Jeep Renegade Trailhawk to look forward to, so that's going to be my next anticipated review, some time in 2015.

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

The Renegade Trailhawk does look like a tasty package. The approach angle looks to be a little bit of a problem but it's hard to correct that with a transverse platform. The 9-speed's first gear is much much steeper than the lowest ratio in the Forester and when you add to that the available 2-speed transfer case it makes for quite a novel package. The whole thing reminds me a bit of the Suzuki Jimny (not sold in the USA) which is sort of the final incarnation of the Suzuki Samurai. For some reason I don't anticipate a run-away sales success in the USA, but it should be some good, cheap fun.

[@nawaz836]

Hello Alex. Amazing reviews, as always. Thank you. Is a Subaru Outback 2015 on your list for reviews ? Regards,nj

[@rzozaya1969]

I like your reviews, I like that they're practical....

[@AlphaYTang]

Excellent review Alex. Thanks. If Subaru decides never to bring a 5dr or wagon version of the WRX here in the '16/'17 model years, I'll probably get a ForesterXT.

[@brucetanaka3138]

Once again ,a very great review!

[@noah654]

Your reviews are awesome; this one's no different.

[@andreasm2882]

Great review, I currently drive a Subaru Forester but I keep on thinking when the time comes I will upgrade to a truck. I hope you have the opportunity to test drive the new GMC Canyon or Chevy Colorado soon?

[@loklokoppa9255]

Great video. Any changes compared to the 2014? Planning to buy a Forester soon.

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

There are essentially no changes to 2015 to the substance but Subaru did fiddle with the pricing of option packages and included a little more standard equipment.

[@cheffy329]

Alex on Autos Hey Alex, I'm car shopping and I'm torn between getting a 2015 Subaru Forester and a 2015 Nissan Rogue. In your opinion, which do you think is the best choice? Thanks ! Love your reviews, it's because of you that I've narrowed my decision down to two!

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

Tricky. I prefer the Rogue to be honest. The Forester is excellent value and it is more capable off-road and a little more sure footed in the snow, but the Rogue's interior, better pricing and available 3rd row put it to the top of my list. The front seats are also tops in comfort.

[@308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane]

cheffy329 Forester XT > Rogue > NA Forester

[@Bromnax]

Very well done and informative video. I will subscribe and look forward to watching more of your videos.

[@divisioneight]

Excellent review Alex. Remarkable that the CVT tranny gets far better MPG than the 6-speed. And it's a decent value in the slightly used market to with pricing for the top of the line model in the mid twenties for a 2014 unit.

[@werbrown]

Good review Alex, thanks.

[@BlahBlahManYeah]

Alex, I did not find Mitsubishi Outlander among your reviews. I think, its price range, options, 7 seats, and AWD competes well against Subaru offerings. Thank you, as you do good job in your reviews, especially for family oriented people.

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

Russ M I hate to say it, but I really disliked the Outlander and it was one of the few vehicles I drove but felt that I was unable to be objective with. There was nothing about the Outlander that I thought was not done by other manufacturers better with better value attached. For the 7-seat version, the Dodge Journey is a better vehicle in all honesty.

[@BlahBlahManYeah]

Alex on Autos I agree, Journey is definitely sensible option as a family hauler, with more convenience. Though, its on 30K+ side if you want to get V6 and AWD and 10" longer. I would personally consider it as alternative to MDX (there are some states, where car property taxes paid on annual basis) so getting with expensive vehicles has financial implications. Also, I am looking to see Journer reveiw from you soon :)

[@Maverick5588]

great video. i love how extensive this was

[@nabwong]

Alex, awesome review. Thanks for saying CVT and not CVT transmission.

[@stuckinkuwait28]

Very good review, thanks

[@suprashank]

Awesome review... I hate CVT though...

[@vicwiseman6038]

Can you please do a detailed review of the 2017 Forester XT? Thanks!

[@AndrewLitton]

Believe it's mostly the same car. Version 2 of eyesight (added Blind Spot Detection, Lane Change Assist and Rear Cross Traffic Alert), starlink and also facelift. Unsure if there are any more changes.

[@copytekk]

Excellent review!

[@paulcoleman6016]

Excellent review! Thank you

[@kaiviti2013]

I was almost about to walk in and get a Forrester 2015 Limited. Then i saw in media the lawsuit against Subaru for excessive oil consumption up to 2014 models. I emailed Subaru on it to get clarification if 2015 model was affected. They didn't give me a clear answer instead simply said: "The suit alleges that some owners of 2011-2014 Foresters, 2013 Legacy and 2013 Outback, (with 2.5-liter Boxer engines) and 2012-2013 Impreza and Crosstrek models are experiencing oil consumption levels above the owner’s expectations. Only a very small number of customers have identified a concern on this issue. Customers can have full confidence in their Subaru vehicle and our warranty process if required. All vehicles have manufacturing tolerances and different engines will consume oil at different rates. Driving patterns, vehicle usage and conditions such as climate can also affect oil consumption. Typically for these models, no oil is required between scheduled services (if the oil light is not on). In very rare circumstances, up to one quart could be added depending on severity of driving conditions " I am going to hold out now buying Forrester until i see some data and or hear Subaru explicitly say 2015 not affected

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

I'm honestly not sure how big of a problem this really is. The boxer engine design that Subaru uses can consume more oil than a traditional 4-cylinder engine and the engine holds more oil than a typical inline engine as well. Oil consumption is not a problem per se as long as there isn't a larger problem. Some engine designs, especially turbos, can consume up to 1qt of oil in 5,000 miles and that usage would be considered "normal". That being said, I believe that the engine in question is not the same engine used in the 2015 Forester.

[@benjaminlately]

Some of that has to do with how the car was broken in and bad luck. I do not notice any significant oil loss in my 2014 forester XT. My 2005 WRX was a different story. As long as you check the oil from time to time you probably won't have any trouble.

[@ryancrow2876]

if that fact that a very small number of people have noticed slight oil consumption is keeping you from buying a car then id hate to see you check out some of the other manufacturers with their constant recalls and engine fires and such.

[@BTC909]

The seats are flat, needs the 2015 Outback infotainment system, Sport# should be offered on all models.

[@Banaiduduka1]

Nice job, great review!

[@Honestandtruth007]

I have to disagree with you, Alex. I love the performances and the handlings in the Forester in Comparing to CR-V, Nissan rogue and Toyota RAV4. Also The Forester is Way better than the 4Runner in Handling and performance on Everyday driving....I owned all of these cars.

[@AV-kf9jx]

Alex, Please review 2015 Subaru Outback too. Is it really worth $2500 more when compared to forester ?

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

Ill see what I can do. But I can say that the Outback has a much nicer interior and more powerful engine options, so for that $2,500 isn't bad.

[@Kaneda0015]

Alex on Autos Is the Forester got more room than the Outback?

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

Lucky Luke I would say in real terms it is just shaped differently. The Forester is more upright.

[@ashwinm8849]

Alex on Autos Great channel. Could you do a review of the Outback 2015?

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

Ashwin Mohan I hope so. I will have the Legacy very soon.

[@xihaxihaxihaxiha]

Great review as always! thank you Alex.

[@tommietuka]

Hey Alex, what trail / road did you film? Would love to check that out with my subaru

[@shanedykes1719]

Great reviews

[@skyland3854]

ALL IN ONE REVIEW TOOOOO MUCH INFO THANX EXCELLENT JOB !!

[@wilfredwilliams5016]

Just got one yesterday. In 2022.

[@kentfreeman9159]

Good review again Alex. Interested in more detail on the HTCVT and the driving modes. Does the Sport Sharp mode make the vehicle feel more sporty?

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

Not really. Infact it's actually slower to 60 if the car is in any mode where a stepped transmission is imitated. If you really like feeling shifts, then those modes are for you. If you just want to be fast or efficient, leave it in Drive.

[@kentfreeman9159]

Alex on Autos Thanks Alex. One more question. I rented a Subaru XV Crosstrek while on vacation in Colorado last week. Thought the CVT was awful as off the line the Crosstrek was almost dangerously slow. Since you have driven both is the HTCVT on the Forester much more responsive?

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

Kent Freeman They are about the same. Off the line acceleration is slightly slower than some of the competition with as 0-30 time that is around 2.75 seconds. That's not really *that* much slower than something like a Rogue, Exploere, etc but the way the CVT behaves it may "feel" slower than it really is. Subaru's CVT doesn't have as low of a starting ratio as you will find in the average 6-speed FWD vehicle or Nissan's newer CVTs, that's the reason for the slower 0-30 time.

[@OGIgnito]

Alex, First off, your reviews are by far THE BEST on KZbin!!!! Second, any plans to review the new Subaru Impreza??? Preferably the hatchback, fully loaded :) I'm in the market for a high mpg >$30k wagon/hatch, and Subaru is really selling me on its 4wd and EyeSight systems. I've heard that the Imprezas are a bit under-powered with the CVT, and WRX/ STI models are not available in a hatch at this time. A manual may do the trick, but that will negate some tech options. Any thoughts/ insight?

[@OGIgnito]

Alex on Autos !!

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

I'll see what I can do :-)

[@OGIgnito]

Alex on Autos Thanks for the reply :) I'm on pins and needles!!!

[@cloudjc22]

excellent detailed review.

[@Alisters_Adventures]

So the forester is not very quiet on the highway. What would be a quiet compact SUV? Nissan Rogue?

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

Guest The Rogue, Cherokee or CR-V

[@edc5266]

Alex on Autos What trail did you use to test the Off Road capabilities? I'm local and would like to experience the same trail with my current car before making my choice on the Forester XT :) Great info in the video as always!

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

It is a private off-road trail and unfortunately I'm sworn to secrecy as it is not open to the public.

[@nommo4life]

What are your thoughts compared to Mazada cx5 and the Ford Escape?

[@sudheeraks]

Hi Alex, Thanks for the detailed review on Subaru forester. Compared to the Turbo version, does non-Turbo version has enough power for daily driving? for example joining the highway, passing the vehicles or driving uphill etc? Thanks

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

I think so, but I know others with a heavy right foot that find it too slow. The big thing to know about the Subarus (all CVT models right now) is that the transmission doesn't have a very low starting gear (think of it like first) so initial acceleration in any model, the V6 and turbo included, is a little lacklustre, but after about 30 MPH the benefit of the CVT is apparent and 0-60 times are equal to or ahead of the competition.

[@soloflight1975]

Did they fixed the excessive oil consumption problem?

[@PaulPushkarov]

Am I confused, or you had review of Subaru Outback 2015? I can not find it now...

[@ah8296]

Would you pick the Forester XT over the Ford Escape Titanium?

[@edwardlaw797]

Look up subaru awd videos on KZbin... Take a trip to colorado & at any crossroad look for a subaru, stop & ask them why do they drive subarus

[@mtchen3658]

Hi Alex, I saw your videos a lot and I am interesting about Forester and Outback. I know outback has more extra storage but Forester can choose Turbo engine. Can you give me some advise about those two vehicles, THX

[@AllAndersonsFault]

Great review! Does the 2015 Forester come with blind spot detection?

[@TheMountainGarden]

Ashten Moss Yes, it is optional.

[@wilsonsamsonwilliams]

My favourite car❤❤❤❤

[@ChemAndAdrenaline]

Forester is the Compact SUV, where Crosstrek is the CUV. :)

[@fightingcarrot]

Alex, how does this compare to the new 2016 CX-5 (all wheel drive)?

[@mountainhobo]

Would that mean Outback is coming next? That would be great.

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

I hope so, but I don't know yet.

[@garystar4475]

Can you please review the 2017 with a 2.5 and CVT? Thank-you

[@chrisbrownaz]

Please review the Forester again!

[@allabouthim03]

so what is the quietest most comfortable compact SUV?

[@ankursharma8624]

Number 1 Two-Row Crossover for msrp less than $35K on my list. If money was no object then Jaguar F-Pace.

[@bochokgalante3914]

Hey Alex, I am torn between 2015 subaru forester xt and 2016 mazda cx5 awd. Which one is better? Thanks! Btw your car reviews are the best. Cheers.

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

Bochok Galante That depends on what you're after. The interior, infotainment and handling abilities of the Mazda are superior, but the Fotrester is the more capable vehicle in the snow or in mind off-road situations.

[@bochokgalante3914]

Alex on Autos thanks!

[@HoopsKing25]

+Alex on Autos the forester xt will outperform the Mazda in any condition

[@UzumakiNaruto_]

+HoopsKing25 But why does Subaru make SUVs that look like COMPLETE ASS? All these years and they still can't make a good looking SUV. >_>

[@HoopsKing25]

UzuMaki NaRuto​, good question. Lol, all I know is they are pretty light, great on safety and work awesome compared to other suv's

[@jasonkresock2196]

Living in N.E. PA, paved roads are normally of an "off road" grade. Even our Highways are a real Mess! Lmfao This would be perfect!

[@Noukz37]

No knob to play with but is always ready for my slippery conditions? I'm baffled.