2020 Ford Explorer ST Review | The Mustang Of CUVs

Ford has dabbled with performance crossovers before, but the last Explorer Sport wasn't as sporty as most of us had hoped. Thankfully the Explorer ST for 2020 is an entirely different animal. The big change isn't the twin-turbo engine, not is it really the power level which comes in at a healthy 400. It's the transmission that's key to the ST's new found performance. Ford'a 10-speed RWD transmission can handle far more power than the transmission in the Edge ST or last gen Explorer Sport and that's why this Explorer is considerably faster. How fast? Try 5.1 seconds 0-60. While that's not as fast as a Durango SRT, the Explorer is more nimble, more fun to toss around and considerably less expensive. Does that make this the Mustang of crossovers? Perhaps...
Join Today: bit.ly/2WdCEwW
The Best Cars, Trucks & SUVs: • The A List - The Best ...
Follow AoA on Facebook: theautobu...
Follow The Mountain Garden: goo.gl/icFWcd

[@MikeTarlton]

Great review! The ST looks way better than the Platinum.

[@silverbullet6084]

They are identical except for the badging, I have a platinum, don’t know why it would look way better? Because of a ST badge?

[@mattbiereichel357]

@@silverbullet6084 well and all that platinum

[@RandomVideos-re9ux]

@@silverbullet6084 they have some pretty significant differences. there is way much more chrome on the platinum, while the ST is more blacked out. It just looks sportier, but of course its a subjective thing. Also, you can option the smaller screen on the ST which looks significantly better than the larger screens

[@Sir_Meezy]

hmmmm the Ford Explorer ST with a tune sounds like a true sleeper

[@Gltokensp06]

People will generally swap the intercoolers on their EcoBoost engines and tune the turbos for higher PSI for big gains for not a lot of money. Luckily, the aluminum blocks are pretty solid in the Gen3+ EcoBoost engines.

[@Crazynacky]

The 2020 Platinum with a tune would be the real sleeper. Has the same engine with a lower horse power ECU tune, so theoretically has the same overall potential with a tune. Without all the “Ford Performance” tuning and blacked out trim it would be much less conspicuous.

[@brettkeller7555]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/apDHg5V8fJKUf5I

[@ciroc_lobster4052]

Geronimo Jenkins A saftey engineer at my work drives a 2020 Platnium and they are nice

[@bigal6684]

Unless I'm mistaken, This motor beats the power output of the F-150 5 liter. And at lower revs! That is remarkable.

[@2008guelo]

You did it once again thank u Alex for uploading such a detailed review, I love all your videos ...

[@LuisGonzalez-sb9lx]

Meh

[@joellopez8239]

Finally, RWD layout is coming back to the mainstream. Very smart from Ford.

[@matthewwilliams9200]

I live in maine I like the fwd awd setup for stability. I think the only reason they used the rwd is because GM'S incompetence in not delivering with their part fwd 10speed. hopefully ford if they want to team up with anyone they team up with Toyota/aisin. lol but I'll love to get this even with the red. even though I'd love a heavier duty fwd 10speed

[@shb9641]

The st model is awd only

[@hochhaul]

It's a shame it's so damn ugly

[@yassinemugma6983]

هنا ينتهي المطاف

[@normandguenette5211]

matthew williams You should allow yourself a threat, road test an all wheel drive propulsion chassis in the snow and ice and you’ll appreciate the handling advantage of this chassis over any traction set up !,

[@MrSupersaiyangoku]

Not going to lie. I’m digging this SUV hard. I really like it.

[@rkalla]

Agreed... it took me a few weeks but I just like it more and more.

[@harleyjackson5513]

Very nice SUV! Well done FORD!

[@morrisfoley5840]

I'm not lying I'm a four sigmatic I love the Shelby collection of the F-150 Super Snake Saleen F-150 Jack Roush F 150 nitemare you're great with this vehicle here Publix on winter these guys giving us a great summary on this

[@J.Sandhu2]

that blue color?? damn

[@bigal6684]

I'm putting this up against a F-150 because I can substitute a small utility trailer for a bed when needed. I like it better than the Honda Passport, etc. because of the rear drive, added power and weight would seem to make it a more competent tow vehicle. And the blue is quite sweet.

[@duanebrown8110]

ive had my ST for about 5 months now. Definitely my favorite after owning 3 previous explorers. Packed with response and power for sure. Sport mode in conjunction with the manual paddle shifters make this model a speed demon for sure. GREAT JOB FORD !!

[@foadrightnow5725]

Always excellent and informative video, as usual! Just a small suggestion, your vehicle and wheelbase length comparison scale should have numerical inch indicators. That would allow for quick specific info comparisons. Cheers!

[@musicISlyf1]

I actually like the smaller infortainment screen than the bigger one.

[@bradburmeister9652]

Im with you there

[@Jbiglin]

Me too

[@2KCamaroZ28SS]

Yeah it looks out of place.

[@hillre14]

I've had mine for about a week and I wish it came with the smaller one

[@AxcelerateRoblox]

I hate both but i prefer the smaller one but i still got the bigger one

[@chikidd24]

I help make these suv's everyday at ford motor company they are top of the line and even more beautiful in person! 😊

[@PartyUpLive]

Over on Torrence Ave? That's really cool. I worked in that area a lot over the years.

[@chikidd24]

@@PartyUpLive yesss

[@dcarts5616]

With how expensive they are becoming, it makes people not want to have kids. Who does Ford think is going to buy these in 15-20 years?

[@chikidd24]

@@dcarts5616 come on bro u cant compare a luxury suv to having kids plus people having been living beyond there means since the dawn of time and still have kids u only have 1 life enjoy it!😁

[@dcarts5616]

chikidd24 a base model at $36K is not luxury. Debt is dumb, cash is King.

[@DylanGarciaaa]

That portrait style screen looks terrible in my opinion 🥴 Loved the ones already built into the car, or at least one that was horizontal to give it a cleaner look

[@chrischambless]

Dylan Garcia you would dig the Aviator’s screen

[@RangerAmateur]

That's one of the ugliest integration of a screen in modern cars.

[@brianwinkler8183]

If one can afford a ST, it's hard to beat the packaging. 0-60 5.1 sec, seating for 6 or lots of cargo room, great handling, and can tow 5600 lbs. That's hard to beat for between $50-60k. Makes me curious what an Aviator hyrbrid will do with 450 hp and 600 lb-ft.

[@heartcomedy5]

Brian Winkler, it’s a lot larger and heavier. Maybe 0-60 in 5.5seconds but tows 8500lbs

[@mattspeer01]

@@heartcomedy5 Explorer is 198.8 inches long, Aviator is 199.3...so only a half inch difference in length. Explorer AWD weighs 4345 lbs, Aviator GT is 5678 lbs, non-GT AWD is 4897 lbs. So they are basically identical in size, but yeah the Aviator is heavier...especially the hybrid GT.

[@SteelTimeify]

Dodge Durango SRT.

[@TK-xy5zm]

@@SteelTimeifyNah, too many on the road, everyone's got one

[@hellkitty1014]

Well done Ford. Finally, an Explorer that's not a penalty box. It took 9 years just to catch the JGC/Durango. But it may be short-lived, given that the Grand Cherokee will be moving to the highly-flexible Giorgio II platform and will receive the new 3.5L I-6 twin-turbo engine. That said, I do like this Explorer. The ST is so more my speed, and is an excellent family hauler. It is interesting that tow rating is so low at 5600 pounds. And I wish Ford would have stolen a couple of Lincoln interior designers because this looks dated already.

[@MrHav1k]

Ford knocked it out of the park with this one. I want one!!

[@Vladimirkawa]

Excellent job by Ford. Amazing engine under the hood, 400 HP 🤟😋!! and the interiors with very nice gadgets i Thanks Alex for your excellent job. Greetings from Chile 🇨🇱

[@tommutchler2939]

Thanks Alex! Great review!! Finally someone who got it right and compared this to the Durango RT, as well as making those comparisons to the Germans. Sounds like a suitable replacement for my 2011 Durango Hemi Crewlux. Note that by the time you option out a Durango RT (tech package, tow package) to equal the Explorer ST, the prices are very close. The Explorer also brings a surround view camera and pedestrian monitoring that the Durango lacks. I also was happy to learn that you can get 4-way lumbar, although it looks like you need the optional tech package (with the portrait screen) for that. Given that the ST is estimated to be 20% of the mix (according to the order guide), I think that markups will be relatively short-lived. At least I hope so. :)

[@gondorian1006]

You could also just get an Aviator, which has the same power and a lower base price. Starts as RWD instead of AWD so that could be a plus or a minus, depending on your preferences.

[@justabrokeredneck]

check again. these are far cheaper

[@justabrokeredneck]

@@gondorian1006 the platinum makes 35 less horsepower

[@ClaytonYatescarenthusiast]

Gas mileage is at 12.3 and traction control is off. Umm doing doughnuts bro?

[@babaktaherian]

As always, and as expected, an outstanding review by Alex on Autos

[@MarkRVillano]

The BMW might be more luxurious and have better fit and finishes, but it will break down more frequently, parts will be more expensive, service availability will not be as convenient or easy to find, it will cost more to insure, and it will depreciate faster. BMW should put a depreciation gauge on the dashboard right next to the tach. It would have to be something like a calendar / odometer combo gauge, with a dollar figure overlay, so you could see how much value your new BMW is losing with every passing mile, and every passing day. This gauge would run continually in the background, so that when you get into the vehicle after a prolonged absence, it would be able to tell you exactly how much less it is worth since the last time you drove it. I would also suggest that they include a Doomsday / Sunset feature with the depreciation gauge. This feature would activate when the car has achieved maximum worthlessness, which can be described as the point where it would make more sense financially to have it crushed and made into a coffee table, than it would to replace the carbon ceramic brakes.

[@MrHav1k]

lol. True, true, true. That's why you lease those things.

[@heman691]

It’s a Horrible suv and I’ve never had a bmw break down in ten years.

[@stephenhendricks103]

Impressive vehicle. Considerably more impressive than the ST version of the Edge. And given Ford's reliance on fleet sales for the Explorer, I suspect the ST will be the base on which sales to many law enforcement agencies are aimed. I do see one horsefly in the ointment for the entire Explorer line, though. Ford is offering 4 trim levels for the Explorer. The volume trims (XLT and Limited) each come standard with the 2.3L Ecoboost 4 cylinder turbo engine. And those are the only trims with MSRP's under $50K before any options. That 2.3L four banger is an impressive engine in a Mustang but I'm skeptical about its durability and overall performance in a two and half ton vehicle. Further, I doubt that most owners will meet EPA mpg's with that engine, a problem that's endemic to smaller turbos that derive their power primarily when turbo boost is relied upon. Of all the competition in the midsize 3 row SUV segment only the CX-9 and the Ascent don't offer a standard or optional naturally aspirated V6. The Explorer offers such an engine only in the hybrid configuration. And once again, that model has a minimum MSRP of more than $53,000 (in Limited trim). Otherwise, the only V6 option is a twin scroll turbo with an MSRP close to or well above $60,000 in the ST or Platinum trims. Ford deserves kudos for the new generation of the Explorer. Some consumers will be attracted to the RWD (and RWD-biased) platform. The V6/hybrid configuration is appealing for those who want a larger midsize relatively fuel efficient vehicle. The ST is a well priced performance SUV for those who want one. But compared to its rivals the Explorer line-up appears to have a rather large gap near the middle of its trim levels. The KIA Telluride and the Hyundai Palisade with NA V6 engines are much better equipped than a comparable Explorer with MSRP's thousands of dollars less. Much the same is true of the Honda Pilot and the 2020 Highlander. Perhaps Ford can poach some consumers considering luxury brands but a Ford badge lacks that cache. I hope Ford is successful with its sixth generation Explorer. It's a major upgrade compared to the last generation. And Ford's fleet sales probably assures it will outsell every other brand in its category. But the vast majority of Explorers will be equipped with the same base engine as the Mustang. And Ford's alternatives are lacking unless one is willing to pony up a lot more cash.

[@markrozenberg7959]

Stephen Hendricks great analysis. Ford seems to have ceded the mid-level trim market to its rivals.

[@Cityofemeralds]

I LOVE the Edge 😍😍😍

[@DRII-yv1yt]

you're highly under estimating Ford's turbo 2.3L engine! it's a gem and out performs most competitors' NA V6s! thus your overall analysis is off.

[@stephenhendricks103]

@@DRII-yv1yt As I said, I find the 2.3L engine very impressive. I nearly purchased a Mustang with that engine last year. But the Mustang weighs between 1000 and 1300 lbs less than an Explorer! Physics is physics and expecting a small displacement turbocharged engine to be as durable and reliable as a naturally aspirated engine at least a full liter larger in displacement is based based on faith, not logic or evidence. I've been driving 2.0-2.5L turbocharged engines for over 30 years (Saabs) and I currently drive a 2.0L turbo in my GTI. But in a vehicle that weighs 2 and a half tons with fuel and passengers, it's not an optimal choice.

[@stephenhendricks103]

@@Cityofemeralds I like the Edge, too. In fact, I nearly purchased an Edge Sport last year when I replaced the family SUV. But the Edge ST is not nearly as impressive an upgrade over its Sport predecessor as the sixth generation Explorer is compared to the last generation.

[@jasonbrown522]

The interior is ugly, but the exterior is nice. That tablet infotainment is ridiculous and totally silly looking. Not very well thought out. Seems like an afterthought.

[@liberalweirdo7886]

Sounds like ford built one hell of a truck

[@autonewstv86]

Great review! The ST looks way better than the Platinum. 👍

[@silverbullet6084]

I have the platinum and they are identical except for the badging? Interior and exterior

[@JesusisKing70]

I wish you would have covered interior quietness, otherwise great review as always.

[@ginsure]

I have one. Very quiet at high speeds

[@tsimon3235]

I bet no one in any dealer can provide you this much detail information! very professional and knowledgeable.

[@tviperjester3978]

So we just picked up our 2020 explorer ST last week and let me tell you, this car is unbelievable. I was actually going to buy out our lease end 2017 explorer but decided to lease again and wow, really happy we did. The power and drive is almost 10x better, I love the 4 pipe exhaust and just the aggressiveness of the car. The engine, the look, the sound and the performance are all top notch. It’s our family SUV so the increased room for passengers was a big plus. The ST street pack and technology package were a great choice. I really can’t get enough of driving this car, it’s really the mustang of SUVs. Only downsides compared to our 2017 is less trunk as noted in the video and i noticed getting into the driver seat I have less headroom in getting through the door, not a big deal but I have to crouch a little more to get in. If you are on the fence on getting the ST, I highly recommend.

[@jmart-]

How much is the lease of the ST in ur area?

[@normap1229]

Wait 4 years, buys one for 20k less.

[@herbieherb8982]

You right. Even wait for a year and you will get that price.

[@BulletSpoung]

In four years it will be 50% off.

[@lordshin73]

But by then this piece of junk will have fallen apart

[@joebrown9621]

The ST front end looks better but the back looks bland compared to the platinum, could be the colour with the black out bits

[@garrettcolby4239]

To bad they did not make the 5.0 a option, if that were there I would be buying one. Glad to see its back to rear drive again.

[@rustybeatty6567]

GARRETT Colby the engine bay is not quite big enough for the 5.0 coyote v8 and the engine cooling system as well but I still see your point though a v8 would have been nice a 4.0 V8 built just like the 5.0 V8 might fit though and added a supercharger to the 4.0L V8 making 500 Hp and 450 TQ.

[@zap7378]

Yep, agreed w/Rusty, it's about fitment. But if it hp/tq, bring on the tune!

[@final_mile_music9713]

Got mine today in Magnetic grey with tech pack, street pack and dual panel moon roof. It’s absolutely gorgeous in the flesh, it drives fantastic and that tablet? I’m used to it in 10 mins. Looks great in real life. The ride is perfect.

[@botasepha]

Nice job you show this vehicle perfect I'll watch any of your videos. And I'm hard to impress. You sold me I've spent 120k with Ford in the last 3 years looks like it's going to be 180k in the last 5 years. Just ordered my new 2020 st explorer last week... should have it in 6 to 8 weeks I'll post a vid when I get it mama gunna love her new ride when it gets done being built.

[@poker_18rs92]

It's a great looking SUV but also very expensive.

[@zzanatos2001]

All well-equipped, full-sized SUVs are expensive - especially performance models that have 400 horsepower. Things like panoramic sunroofs, adaptive cruise control, parking sensors, rear view cameras, blind spot warning systems, cross traffic alert, digital dashboard displays, dual-zone automatic climate control, touch-screen infotainment systems, Apple Car Play/Android Auto compatibility, 12-way adjustable seats with bolsters and built-in heating/cooling and massage functions, high-quality stitched leather, Bang and Olufsen 14-speaker sound systems, acoustic glass, 21-inch aluminum wheels, performance brakes, and twin turbochargers tend to add a few dollars to the price tag.

[@deu8894]

truly sporty exterior appearance with a matching drive-train.

[@cadsux]

Such praise, especially from a Durango owner! The 760 hp, 5.2L supercharged V8 from the Mustang GT500 would make this even tastier.

[@dragoonTT]

Shelby Explorer Cobra. Let Shelby have fun with the platform. That would be interesting.

[@final_mile_music9713]

I disagree. Firstly because of the extra weight. This is close to 50:50 distribution. Secondly because it spoils the fun to have so much power that you simply cannot exploit. You just can’t rev it out most of the time. I had. 2017 Mustang GT. I was incredible. It was also incredibly frustrating. You just couldn’t wring it out on the road without losing you license. Totally spoiled the fun. A Miata that I could rev to the line would have been much better. And that’s why 400hp in this is perfect. It doesn’t need any more. More is not always better. Just my view....

[@Gltokensp06]

If this is any idication on the CD6 platform that will be used in more Ford products, I'm excited about the increased driving dynamics and more excited about the (out of my price range) Aviator.

[@davidvoorhees438]

Alex does a super job and clearly knows his stuff. Very well done.

[@BeamerTime354]

Looks nice but need to pay down my tuned 17 sport a little more for the upgrade lol. Well not an upgrade for power, my sport tuned is doing about 500hp and 0-60 in 4.7sec.

[@yippie6862]

I love the Explorer, but it's become so fricken expensive!

[@robertB2427]

Why do you keep referring to this vehicle as a rear wheel drive? The ST is AWD.

[@watchreport]

Because it is rear wheel drive based, vs FWD based, or symmetrical AWD. That means power goes to the rear wheels first.

[@bones0184]

So after tax tags and title you’re probably up around 63,000 if I had that kind of money I don’t think I’d buy an explorer

[@bigal6684]

I totally agree about the tow hitch receiver being uncovered....some of the vehicles with cheap plastic covers (Escalade, Tahoe, etc.) look awful. A tow hitch is a beautiful thing! Be proud of it.

[@bobonthis9520]

Anybody what to guess how many recalls it will have ? More tech in any Ford means trouble :) Ford has taken such a nose dive in build quality and reliability. My co-workers 2018 F150 has been in for warranty work every month since new :(

[@cadsux]

Maybe someday Ford/Lincoln will change the MKZ & Continental to RWD, since they're both offered with the 400 hp 3.0L engine. A performance oriented Lincoln?!

[@mosheyehuda]

the MKZ 3.0T AWD is already performance oriented even its fwd biased

[@cadsux]

I guess. The Focus ST/RS is fwd. But my point is that Lincoln sedans use to be RWD, just like the Explorer. In the spirit of Alex's headline.

[@medellon]

Another great review Alex, I'm really not digging that tablet screen. I prefer the screens to be better integrated into the dash.

[@reaality3860]

If it really were the Mustang of CUV's it would have a Coyote 5.0 motor.

[@hpkntnw]

Rea Ality hate to break it to you this thing would eat a coyote 5.0 for lunch. The Ecoboost engines have loads of low end torque, I’ve shocked many people with my F-150 that will absolutely leave any V8 in my dust.

[@reaality3860]

@@hpkntnw, I have walked off and left many, many stock f-150's in my stock 2014 Mustang GT. You f-150 truckers are crazy.

[@thefliplife1]

Can you do an in-depth video on the all digital gauges ? No one has covered it yet , and I would love to see all the options and customizations you could do. For example, I would love a more plain normal mode without the blue everywhere. Unsure what customization is available.

[@66skate]

That looks really good in silver with the black trim. Much more aggressive looking than past Explorers.

[@amininshassi6370]

Awesome SUV! Just one question. Does anyone know why the Ford Explorer still doesn't tow as much as the Dodge Durango? Both SUVs are RWD crossovers, have lots of horsepower and torque (at least in the Explorer ST, and the Durango with the 5.7L HEMI V8), they're similar in terms of the size/wheelbase, and the Explorer likely weighs less than a comparable Durango. I'm guessing maybe Durango has a different tow package, or maybe it has something to do with the axle ratios. But the Explorer has a 10-speed automatic compared to the Durango's 8-speed automatic.

[@Baylorbetterthanbrown]

Nobody cares

[@BC08]

2020 Explorer isn’t a CUV, it’s RWD again. Makes it a real vehicle

[@edb.8388]

Good review as always - unfortunately, just out of my price range.

[@Rhyme905]

new CRV/Rav4 pretty good, or go for a older model

[@RBoas]

Do you wish you would have waited to get the 2020 explorer over your Durango?

[@oldschool1928]

Alex, you sound impressed with the Explorer. Are you going to trade in your Durango for this?

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

I leased teh Durango because I hoped the Explorer would be a replacement... But it's not, the towing ability isn't where I need it to be...

[@hellkitty1014]

@@AAutoBuyersGuide I was personally shocked Ford rated the tow rating at only 5600 pounds. The power/weight ratio seems like it could handle more. Maybe they want those that tow like yourself to look at the next row over at the Expedition?😋

[@midnightspeedpainter3602]

Just tune the ST for 93 octane, upgrade intake and exhaust and you'll get more than the SRT hp for sure, and still loads cheaper.

[@marvi1515]

Though I like the Durango, I have to agree with you on that. I can see this with intake/dp/exhaust and tune pulling in great numbers.

[@jsfbay1]

The ST is almost certainly already tuned for 93, and I'll bet money the HP & torque #'s Ford is quoting were obtained on 93 octane.

[@nateavery2875]

Let me know when you drop that GT500 mustang motor in there. ;-)

[@mountainhobo]

This is the first time I am in love with a crossover. Too bad there is always a more rational way to spend $60K.

[@jiggyg2604]

why do these car manufacturers mix LED and incandescent lights? that shit really irks my soul. dealbreaker.

[@jsfbay1]

I don't see it as a deal-breaker for me, but it irks me too - do they still have several million incandescent bulbs to use up or what???

[@southernman5839]

I bought the 2020 Ford Explorer ST and I love it! One mode practically steers it self.

[@bassandtrebleclef]

I was expecting nothing from this, so maybe that's why I'm surprised. Good to see Ford understanding that their interiors sucked and did something about it, especially with the instrument panel.

[@revistadearmas]

ford good job a suv for a guy that needs a suv with little bit of salsa

[@DAVIDLEEBANKS]

I don’t like the back .. I really don’t understand why car company’s are still using halogen bulbs .. they should start using led break lights reverse lights etc.

[@CleanClaspCollector]

Just test drove one. Extremely impressed. Great ride and steering, nice materials and controls, the large Navi screen looks absolutely fine in real life and is no concern and the power is ridiculous!! Like Alex says, it’s kind of a discount BMW. That’s now nicely it drives. It is now at the top of my list.

[@davidwolf226]

Alex, I have to say that I'm impressed with the overall features and performance you've described with this review. While I really love my current RX350, I do NOT like the front wheel drive. Looking forward to your full review of this model later on.

[@Rhyme905]

why did u buy a FWD RX350?

[@WKaznartist]

I'll wait until Ford figures out the recall issues in 1st to 2nd year for this generation. Also because I want the 2nd row bench seats. Thanks Alex.

[@slowanddeliberate6893]

Sounds like the Explorer ST would definitely beat the Durango SRT on a track. Two tenths of a second difference is hardly noticeable when driving on the street. I would pick the Explorer ST over the SRT Durango for its better driving dynamics.

[@ALMX5DP]

Who cares if a large 3-row SUV is faster than another though? I'd probably have to drive both to see which I prefer for it's given use.

[@hellkitty1014]

The Durango has 295s all the way around with electronic dampers. Highly unlikely.

[@ALMX5DP]

HellKitty 101 lol, again who cares? Is it really a bragging point?

[@justaddwata]

How about a drag race with the durango and explorer pulling a 7500 pound trailer..... Oh wait - the explorer cant pull 5700 pounds!! (even a V6 durango is over 6000#). Explorer looks good. But not sure I have ever understood an SUV with 2WD.

[@slowanddeliberate6893]

@@hellkitty1014 The Explorer is smaller, lighter, and more nimble. That should be enough for it to beat the Durango around a road course.

[@LordWinter]

I HATE that ipad thats just stuck in the middle of the dash

[@velboone6041]

Ford has a winner on their hands with this SUV..

[@vr6gls]

Vel Boone Not at $58k they don’t. This is just a mommy mobile with an ST badge slapped on it. This and the Edge ST are insults to the ST brand.

[@CJGOM]

Has a nice stance. This looks promising and wonder if Ford will eventually offer a more extreme version.

[@justabrokeredneck]

it’ll be electric if they do.

[@ayushmalpeddi2793]

I think you have like 4 inches of headroom in the last row lol

[@885.0ELopez]

Ayush Malpeddi that’s fine there seats for kids

[@ariv4479]

Just received my third recall letter for my 2017 Sport . . Rear link may break without warning.... no thx it going back when lease is done.

[@e4300]

The 2.3 litre engine, is this the same head gasket blowing engine that Ford put in the Focus RS.

[@aaronporter9715]

That's the same 2.3 turbo that Ford has been tooling since the 2005 Mazdaspeed 3. It's not exactly the same, but Ford took that engine that Mazda developed (because of their previous ownership), and has been updating it for the past 14 years, putting it's descendants in Mustangs, sedans, SUVs, and trucks.

[@lolz616]

u think they haven't fixed that issue by now?

[@madanielk6526]

RELIABILITY? why is it that 'reliability' is seldom mentioned when speaking of Ford product. This could be a good lease -- not to own..

[@ALMX5DP]

Mada Nielk seldom mentioned? Have you seen the comments section here?

[@madanielk6526]

no, have you? and if so, what do the comments say?

[@ALMX5DP]

Mada Nielk nearly every third comment talks about reliability.

[@cadsux]

Tbf, the sporty alternatives Alex mentioned, such as the Durango & X5, aren't any better. And Toyota & Honda aren't going to invest in Highlander 'TRDs' and Pilot 'Type Rs'. That would cause their reliability ratings to drop. Heck, Honda's reliability plummeted to mid-pack (like Ford!) due to their turbos, & the Clarity.

[@madanielk6526]

@ Alan Bowers... FYI: among the 380 comments on this video there are a total of FIVE "reliability" (not counting this one) found among the 380. Namely, twice mentioned by Mada Nielk, twice mentioned by cadsux3 and once mentioned by Alan Bowers... All of which can be found within this thread started by Mada Nielk. ... CAPISCI?

[@bohan9957]

Every angle looks spot on except for the ass. Seriously, Ford could have done better.

[@NovieBigSad]

Great looking vehicle but Ford's leather quality is so substandard. It feels grainy and is the opposite of premium feeling

[@2KCamaroZ28SS]

Arslan Khalid not really.

[@williesjohnson2673]

Just a short note of appreciation to you my man, your reviews are definitely worth seeing, you don't treat your viewers like they're dolts or hooligans on the road. You're informative and specific in regards to the vehicles you're reviewing. Mucho appreciated especially are your comparisons with other models in the segment. Glad to be a subscriber.

[@SavagexRaccoon]

All I care is that someone other than dodge is bringing RWD back to the mainstream might trade in my old Mazda Tribute for this explorer Ford really put a lot of effort this generation

[@jsfbay1]

Are those power ratings based on 93 octane? Lincoln did/does that with the MKZ (or whichever one is the sedan) so I’d love for someone to measure power using 87 octane regular fuel.

[@IntotheFurther.]

Excellent, detailed review! Loved the comparisons to similar class vehicles. 👍🏽👍🏽

[@Davido50]

Excellent review. I'm sold. Love it. Test driving it Wed literally! Have a dealer appt. Thanks.

[@GeorgeGeo]

I don't know how this got by me.. I missed this release completely and its totally what I am looking for.

[@vdelrio999]

Thank u for comparing this to comparable models. Provides a more complete review.

[@tri3pleagent]

I'm impressed. Great performance for a vehicle that size. Nice features list. RWD platform. This one's a winner.

[@nathanbelcher7755]

I love this vehicle. If I could only pick a color now

[@ginsure]

I bought it in Atlas Blue. Lots of likes for the color

[@WKaznartist]

I'll definitely be patient and wait for whatever problems it will have to be fixed by the 3rd model year.

[@denismarino1117]

Great review, Sofyan , Alex and Geese are my top 3 car reviewers.

[@Crazynacky]

Has the full review been released? I’d love to see your ratings.

[@indevibe]

I. Warming up to this SUV., I was on the fence when it was at the auto shot, but I think ford has some thing here

[@ginsure]

good review and I bought one. However he did not mention about the storage under the rear floor behind the 3rd row seat which increases cargo room as the cover can opened and lowered to the bottom

[@davidramos8454]

Will definitely get this one once my lease is up on my 2018 Explorer sport.

[@FRENCHDRAINMAN]

Unbelievable review. Well Done! Thank You

[@outquick]

In case you read this Ford I will never buy one of your SUVs, ok the Edge ST is cool AF but my fiesta ST was under $20,000 and your Ford edge ST is $50,000 I'm not gonna spend 30 more thousand dollars than I normally would on a car, because you see I'm going to buy a GSXR1000R every two or three years and that cost $20,000. And Ford by the way you don't make anything that fast no congratulations for getting rid of the only cars I would buy from ford. And I'm not dumb I know you guys gave the Nazis a bunch of engines so I didn't look forward to begin with

[@stevedoyel]

I am so torn on this vehicle. I currently have a 2013 Explorer Sport and have absolutely loved it... I felt this new gen is a bit of a letdown and it has me leaning toward the Kia Telluride SX, which for the money (value) appears to blow this Explorer away. That said, my local dealer has 11 of these on the lot currently with HUGE sales. If the price was right, I might still get one... That Kia though! Ford priced this one too high.

[@NorthernUtahDashcam]

Is the exhaust the same as on the Platinum? I can’t decide if I like the ST or Platinum more. Need more details.

[@BradMichell]

Let me know when you figure it out lmao I'm also in that predicament. I'm from mid to northern Canada. I need all wheel drive, I wonder how the winter mode is in the rear wheel

[@watchmanonthewall14]

Alex, your videos are absolutely the best.

[@jeremylatil6022]

Great.... so Ford, put the ST 3.0 EcoBoost in the Ranger and give us a Ranger Raptor

[@davepaek5014]

As an Atlas owner, I like this SUV a lot. Perhaps when we're ready to replace our Atlas, unless VW comes up with a performance version of the Atlas, I would consider this as a serious option.

[@JeffGalner]

I'm considering getting an Atlas. How has yours treated you?

[@davepaek5014]

@@JeffGalner we have the SEL-Premium model (top of the line) with the optional black 20'' Mejora wheels. It handles better than most 3-row crossovers. Has all the creature comforts and safety features. I personally like the looks but some people think it's boring. I paid $47.5k a year ago. It could use more power but it's not a dealbreaker. It could use more soft-touch plastics throughout, but again, not a dealbreaker. We're averaging about 16-18mpg which isn't great. But overall, we love the vehicle for its massive cargo space, which was critical as we have two babies under two years old. My wife isn't in love with it because the car is so big and it can be floaty at times. She prefers smaller vehicles, so when our kids are older and we don't need as much space, we'll most likely downsize. Overall, I like it for what we needed. A year ago, we didn't have as many options for 3-row crossovers, but now, there's the new Explorer, Telluride, and Palisade so that's exciting.

[@JeffGalner]

@@davepaek5014 Awesome, thank you. Those were my impressions of it, too. I think VW needed to skimp in some areas (power, interior materials) to not cannibalize Q7 sales. For your situation (and mine - a 5 year old and an infant), the Q7 was not very helpful. It drove like a dream, but without even putting my kids in it, I knew it would be a giant headache to live with. I'm looking to minimize headaches in my life! It was designed for driving, not using as a family. The Atlas appears to be just the opposite, to an extent. Even with the apparent lack of power, I was so pleasantly surprised at how enjoyable it was drive (although not as nice/powerful as Q7, but also $25k cheaper), and the interior passenger and cargo space is tough to beat, especially for rear-facing car seats that take up miles of room. The virtual cockpit and sunroof are straight Audi, which is awesome, and build quality appears to be very par-for-the-German-course, which is awesome, too. I think I'm going to look at the new Explorer, the Aviator, and the Palisade, but as of now, they all need to knock the Atlas off its leader's perch. Cheers!

[@davepaek5014]

@@JeffGalner I'm a VW guy, so I'm slightly biased. Our other daily driver is the 2018 Golf AllTrack. But for right now, for our long-distance family trips, we can stuff the Atlas with two high chairs, two pack n plays, a baby walker, baby related bags, all of our bags and more, easily into the cargo area of the Atlas. It swallows so much stuff without much fuss. Sure, Q7 drives better. In fact, my brother-in-law owns one and he's always envious of how much cargo space we have over his. I'm okay with not having the refined and powerful engine in the Atlas. After all, it's a family car and not for my daily commute. If I've learned anything as an adult, is that no one cares how fast you drive when you have passengers, especially the little ones.

[@JeffGalner]

@@davepaek5014 and when parenting, convenience and utility wins every day and twice on Sundays! Bench or captains chairs?

[@ntelly9979]

Possibly the best video I’ve ever watched on KZbin, the details and knowledge of the brand will definitely help me make the most informed decision. Thank you 🎉

[@krflyguy2117]

What a great in depth review. I'm calling my Ford guy this week to order an ST. Thank you for you no-nonsense and honest review. FYI, after July the ST will be coming out with a more aggressive sounding exhaust.

[@charlesjones1828]

I ordered mine (Agate Black) on 4/30/2019. It's been in production for a bout two weeks and will probably be delivered in early August. It has the Track Pack and Moon Roofs. I can't wait.

[@andrewkennedy9704]

The huge hinge for the middle seat make the back look extremely uncomfortable for a long trip.

[@miguelircontar]

Ford is gonna sell a ton

[@harleyjackson5513]

I love mine.

[@outquick]

HOW DOES AMERICA NOT GET ALL THE AMERICAN CARS! Ahhhhhhhh give me my Fiesta ST BACK NOW, and the old one, not that new gen crap. And the RS