All Endings Beholder 2

[@kreshravensango8421]

If the father really wanted to give people free will,shouldnt that cost less codes.

[@mrpigfish9007]

ikr that why i came here i was missing like 1 bio safe lmao

[@richardgibson8403]

Keira Rylee Bad dude: hmm, if this costs a lot, it must give me complete power over everyone! (It doesn’t) Bad dude: FUCK

[@BigWarthog]

I think that free will option is the most hard one to code

[@tarinn9598]

probably because the father tried to hide it in the program since if I remember well that choice was done by another administrator before and so it required a lot of codes to get because it was well hidden so the other superiors couldn't remove it

[@kreshravensango8421]

@@tarinn9598 it could have been done another way like code between father and son yet no scattering it to a million pieces where the player could or could not be was apparently smart. Also he wanted the others to not remove it? Yet the key to remove it is where they work

[@lambadajewo.4143]

"You've made the right choice son. I'm proud of you, and I love you very much..."

[@chaosinc.382]

Lowkey teared up at that

[@abdennadheriheb6294]

it made me cry

[@jaredpitts8014]

This game is honestly a masterpiece

[@lambadajewo.4143]

What I love about Beholder is the fact that there's no 100% happy ending. Sure, you can help everyone and overthrow the Wise Leader, but still you won't be totally happy. Hector, Carl and Evan are forever haunted by their memories of people that were hurt one their way to happiness; you cannot simply pass the game without hurting anyone. You have to do at least one unmoral thing to end the game. That's truly magnificient.

[@Auctor42042]

Actually in this game it's possible to not do any imoral actions and beat the game, you will just have to work a lot to gain enough authority, 15k by yourself in the 3 floors. Only thing is that you won't be able to get the last ending the "correct" one either way you can get most of the other ones

[@LegoKick]

@@Auctor42042 and carl chose the worst ending :(

[@morningstar9285]

@@LegoKick actually I had the happiest ending in beholder, Carl and his family survived and fled the country, Patrick became an architect, Martha was cured. And the new tomorrow started a revolution that freed the country. But beholder 2 made the most terrible ending, canon.

[@LegoKick]

@@morningstar9285 exactly :(

[@daryljosephsajulga4912]

At least what they did now is the right thing to do.

[@scootermcpeanuts6699]

I just realized something, when Albert DeSalvo gets arrested, he throws several threats at Evan, one of them being “I’ll cut your eyes out, Redgrave” 8:08 …Jesus Christ.

[@fakesmile3363]

How to find dirt on him? I tried so much

[@scootermcpeanuts6699]

@@fakesmile3363 You have to put a password into his computer to unlock a certain area in his office. I won´t spoil what´s down there in case you haven´t seen it yet.

[@coomfard5771]

It’s always sad when you finish an amazing game. Will remember beholder 1 and 2 for a long time.

[@CheddarPerson_05]

Beholder 3 Coming Soon

[@DV_L_N]

@@CheddarPerson_05 Frank has nothing to do with Evan or Carl, unfortunately. It's like a retread of the first game, an independent story. Only bad thing is, the ministry still stands, which means almost none of the Evan good endings could be cannon.

[@CheddarPerson_05]

@@DV_L_N So, it appears that the canon ending for Beholder 1 is ministry ending with Martha dead. Beholder 2 canon is likely Evan destroying or isolating heimdall.

[@whatadistinguishedgentlecat]

@@CheddarPerson_05 maybe the forced people's own choice ending? Idk, might be wrong.

[@JenniferBlangetti]

0:00 Connect independent circuits 1:59 Isolate Heimdall 3:52 Add administrator (Ferguson) 5:58 Add administrator (DeSalvo) 8:20 Add administrator (Weinberg) 10:34 Add administrator (Hemnitz) 12:26 Happiness for all 15:05 GODMODE 17:35 You've got to jump off cliffs all the time and build your wings on the way down

[@ameliapangan8279]

Connect Independent Circuits: 0:01 Isolate Heimdall: 2:01 Add New Administrator (Ferguson): 3:55 Add New Administrator (DeSalvo): 6:02 Add New Administrator (Weinburg): 8:25 Add New Administrator (Hemnitz): 10:39 Happiness For all! Free of charge!: 12:26 GODMODE: 15:05 You’ve got to jump off cliffs all the time and build your wings on the way down: 17:34

[@vladimirlenin693]

This part was good, but the first Beholder was masterpiece.

[@ireneuszpyc6684]

I gave up on Beholder the first: its user interface was hard to operate

[@vladimirlenin693]

@@ireneuszpyc6684 i gave up on the second part because of that reason.

[@theblackcoat4615]

@@vladimirlenin693 As soon as you know how to do the Documents, it‘s easy. But Floor 25’s documents/money-earning-system is *H E L L*

[@kanabis134]

First beholder was great and sequel is really bad imho

[@freddytvset1055]

​@@kanabis134 Not so.

[@FretZer]

Interesting fact about 1st ending: In russian version there "Яблоко от яблони недалеко падает!" instead of "Like father! Like son!" It literally translates like "Apple doesn't fall far away from it's tree!". And Evan really fell to the same place as his father

[@kairan__1663]

its the same in polish version

[@Christall5]

And it basicly means that kids are often similar to their parents. We have a similar figure of speech in Germany. "Der Apfel fällt nicht weit vom Stamm."

[@theblackcoat4615]

It feels like of all the Bosses, Weinberg is the only one treating Evan good after getting In-Charge.

[@That_Fuse_Goo]

Also Fenguson can be friendly if you befriend him. Not sure about DeSalvo but I dont think so as he is a vengeful sadist.

[@Not_a_Doctor_]

​@@That_Fuse_Goo I didn't befriend with DeSalvo and he threw me to the jail just like Fenguson ending in this video. This applies to all bosses I guess.

[@myaltaccountthatiwillbarel2288]

Ferguson too if you aren't a dick to him. He gives you arguably the second/3rd best ending if you don't jail him or annoy him.

[@Jdhusker]

*A LOW PULSADING HUM*

[@brujojr7988]

Pulsating*

[@davidfryar643]

@@brujojr7988 r/wooosh

[@brujojr7988]

@@davidfryar643 How is that supposed to be a joke?

[@Tumus1107]

Shiit I like this ending music

[@Comintern1919]

Yeah, and I love how for the "good" ending, the song, while still being the same, changes into a hopeful tune.

[@martyna3267]

Shit, me too.

[@nickspencerfishingrodd2383]

@@Comintern1919 ikr

[@ak19910716]

Why didn't his father just initiate the "right" protocol before jumping off the building then? Wasn't the project already finished? Wouldn't it lead to this "good" ending directly without getting his son through all the trouble?

[@tlst9999]

In retrospect, if you hide 250 codes around the building and need all 250 for your chosen outcome, you'll probably forget one code under duress when you're surrounded by three guys aiming their guns at you.

[@theblackcoat4615]

@@tlst9999 I don‘t remember the Ministers having guns. Only Hemnitz had one but Caleb Redgrave made a Forcefield Incase of that. And even If he would‘v e choosen to do the protocol right there, he would‘ve gathered the codes again If he needed to. It‘s not like they could shoot at him for it, since there qould be no Administrators then and Heimdall would be Isolated and so inaccessible. It‘s confusing as hell still why he would put Evan through 3 Floors of pure Horror with absolutely terrible bosses.

[@delayanimation423]

@@theblackcoat4615 Everyone from the Inner Circle had this thing which prevented the effects of Heimdall boring into them. So he couldn't just do it.

[@iamthepersonwhoasked5639]

@@tlst9999 plus one guy could go and hunt the son and blackmail him

[@myaltaccountthatiwillbarel2288]

​@@delayanimation423How come Hemntiz doesn't just shoot you the second the forcefield ends then?

[@pandokathecool]

I love how forcing everybody to be happy, is a terrible idea!

[@TheBlobik]

What I dislike is that it is very easy to lock yourself out of the best ending through little fault of you own, in my case I got Marco arrested without bringing the letter to him, so I didn't get the drug quest, so I didn't get info from Serena about dismantling the vending machine, so I didn't dismantle it and was one safe short. And since this is early in the game, going for a re-do is not really an option.

[@freddytvset1055]

DeSalvo's basement... It closes when he is arrested.

[@RoyIMVU]

Tbh, I liked my playthrough to get all of the Bad Endings, I found them so much more interesting. i think it was so funny when he was so shocked that I let all of the bosses have a pass.

[@terry8794]

The narrator's English may be broken, but I'm not going to lie: those Russian developers still have better English and a wider vocabulary than the majority of my countrymen here in the USA, and are way more philosophical.

[@ireneuszpyc6684]

it's unfair to compare developers to uneducated people data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=RU-XU&start=1988 Russia got caught in the middle-income trap, while North America leads the world

[@terry8794]

@@ireneuszpyc6684 Dude, I'm not comparing them to uneducated people; I'm complementing them, because I understand they're not native English speakers, and I'm complementing the fact that their English is even better than native speakers. Nevertheless, I admire their philosophical profoundness.

[@ireneuszpyc6684]

@@terry8794 I don't think it's a Russian developer's voice: I think they hired a native English speaker, who lives in Russia & teaches English

[@saimys87]

@@ireneuszpyc6684 narrator in English version is also in a russian

[@saimys87]

@@ireneuszpyc6684 His name is Alexandr Notkin

[@YasuroLudenberg]

Say what you want, but i kinda like the one with Issac

[@lenaj-b957]

Oooo Hisoka na prof ❤

[@mayyanna444]

Siema Polacy xD

[@rnukur0]

Me too

[@aminfarshi6208]

Same

[@soliel5680]

Same i think thats the most preferable to the final choice and also the most interesting.

[@ArtemiyAkinfeev]

The fact that this is a game from Russian developers is very ironic

[@pancakes8670]

Many citizens under Authoritarian Regimes are aware of what's happening around them. It's just a shame they're unable to express it.

[@StableSect]

и что же в этом ироничного? Ты очень удивишься, когда узнаешь, какой огромной свободой я обладаю

[@imperialofficer6185]

oink :)

[@Handlelesswithme]

Why we in the US knows the governments corrupt Is it ironic that we are correct?

[@freddytvset1055]

Haha

[@dangerdean9066]

All but the 250 codes ending has Darkness by Allen Grey as it's track

[@axelander9397]

Why wouold the last one end in freedom though? before they were able to think for themselves aswell. Also why didn't Hemnitz kill Evan in that one?

[@BKvartS]

Evan still had the Force Field. And Hemnitz has been executed just like the other Ministers.

[@cthulhluftagn3812]

I think it's due to the program effectively neutralised the generations of propaganda that convinced them the ministry was in total control.

[@pacifistminigun3987]

yea, it doesn't feel like true freedom of thought.

[@iamthepersonwhoasked5639]

@@pacifistminigun3987 nah the thing is the last code eliminated the propaganda of the state which was brainwashed into people's minds and previously they were living in fear and controlled but those (sourced of fear ig: ministry) was eliminated

[@pancakes8670]

They all had the capacity to think for themselves, but were tricked into not doing so by State Propaganda and Upbringing. The Heimdall project forcefully told everyone "You think for yourself now, no more Wise Leader" Like a previous commenter noted, it basically erased the generations of Ministry Propaganda.

[@astheticeyeae5239]

Should I destroy towers above sity ? Of course I am!

[@JS-iu3ce]

Михаил Лоренц city*

[@affinityxs]

*can

[@dimasticshow212]

In russian that voice sound lower and deeper. Not enough drama in english version

[@bluestrategist9aby540]

Agree

[@madhatten00]

the best ending is the first one heimdall is evil and it is on people to become evolved as a society naturally

[@ForcollBr]

I made the best ending at first i couldnt belive i got all codes

[@Pelasmo]

cool vid even though im not sure how i should feel about the constant skipping to the next bit of talking when the one ur on isnt even done yet

[@agedstring]

8:37 I laughed at this

[@craftergamer9058]

I don’t have the god mode option in my game.

[@hansmercredi3636]

15:40 Best ending

[@DV_L_N]

"Evan Redgrave is a god now! And what does it matter that the fate of all gods is loneliness?" Evan isn't truly happy. Plus, what's going to happen when he dies? They'll have no god to worship when Heimdall tells them to worship Evan as a god.

[@eun_eu]

WHERE IS LAST ONE CODE? I'M ONLY 240 CODES

[@Curseius]

magda rakovich's desk, (1st floor) find one of those top secret folders to give to her she will leave her office and you can open her desk/hack her computer.

[@eun_eu]

Curseius omg.. thx :) and 250code get thanks

[@originalname9879]

Curseius how did you know which one he was missing?

[@Curseius]

original name its the most common one to miss who figures that you can check rakovich's desk when she's there all the time.

[@Mr_Lunatic_Mr]

Free will best

[@kingkcheifre]

why the fuck are you gonna post a video of cutscenes, ONLY TO SKIP TEXT?! Disliked.

[@Akakyla]

Не канон!! Beholder русская игра.

[@ricedolphin7348]

И что такого?

[@whitehistoricnail739]

И че? Тут все концовки что в русской версии, что в этой, одинаковы

[@Lertaf]

Ну чё американцы, как вам игра от России

[@lolman007]

Ну, им нравится

[@ari_jean]

Офигеть, я даже не знала, что это русская игра

[@whitehistoricnail739]

Почему, когда мы играем в американскую игру, они не пишут: Ну КаК, нРаВитСя ИгРа? А мы пишем, вот объясните, почему?

[@panzershrek4511]

@@whitehistoricnail739 у них игры по умолчанию считаются, как минимум, годными, а для нас это праздник)

[@whitehistoricnail739]

@@panzershrek4511 ну да, правильно, наверное из за того, что в России мало хороших игр, популярные на западе

[@sulimanthemagnificent4893]

The final ending would make any leftist go up in flames

[@sulimanthemagnificent4893]

@Dragon Dragon how so, My consensus does not remove other consensuses based on the fact we view them as wrong, my consensus allows coexistence of other consensuses, weather or not i agree with these other consensuses does not matter, what matters is that one is allowed to express ones self, regardless of what they do or say, you consensus, does not allow freedom, in so far as it goes out of its way to suppress others for safety and security, mind you i am not saying that either consensus is incoreect i am just saying that both have merits that make them valid and invalid to others, i will explain (maybe not the best example) A person seeking to suppress "dangerous" speech may think 1+1 = 2 A person seeking to allow any and all speech may think that 3 - 2 is 1 Both are correct, in a sense but they view things differently, in the end they want the same goal the advancement of people as a whole, the method of approach carries from consensus to consensus, in saying this however each consensus is also wrong to some extent, in it's methodology, an example The left seeks to censor anything and everything that contradicts them, even if it may be true, The right seeks to allow anything and everything, even if it contradicts them or maybe false and wrong in essance neither is right nor wrong, neither is valid nor invalid, they each have there merits and demerits and that is why we are allowed to freely choose in our society, that is also why most people tend to lean one way or the other, because of societal circumstances, example A hard working man with a bussiness may seek to support a free market so his bussiness my prosper, (and i mean one without influence from bigger competitors) A lazy man with no job nor income (weather through faults of his own or not) will seek a welfare state, both however wish for a stable economy, both philosophies are valid and invalid all the same, what may work for one person may not work for another, what maybe moral for example polygamy may be immoral to another, this is how everything works to say that one view point is the only correct one is not only wrong it is grossly incorrect, Now to quickly adress my point in my "comment" it was a joke one you seem to have taken to heart, and i may seem to have taken your retort to heart but believe me with the amount of things like this i get i could careless, the only thing i seek to accomplish is to make you less ignorant and more open to see how other views function and opperate (also given what i just said how could right wingers be triggered by it they seek freedom maybe not in the right means but for the right reasons)

[@sulimanthemagnificent4893]

@Dragon Dragon you make a fair point at the end as for everything else well yee ask and yee shall receive "-If the "right" wishes to allow every thought, even if it contradicts them, why are they so desperately angry to ban ideologically left wing ideas, even moderate centrist ideas such as liberalism even" they may be "angry" with them but you do not see them doing the stuff some other people, do most of the time of course you have your outliers in any given situations but still, you ever heard the quote, "i dont like what you say but i will defend your right to say it" both sides used it, one abandoned it, one side nuters the other with personal attacks, the other side nuters the other with attacks on their intellect, both are bad and neither are good, they do not help a person in any way shape or form "-If the "Left" wishes to suppress all kinds of speech, why then, historically, the sides of freedom of expression and anti-censorship have been contextually and traditionally left wing positions?" they have been "traditional" left wing positions, tradition implying old, and they already threw the old ideas out, the right and i mean the ideological right not the fiscal right there is a huge difference between the two, often opposed the rights of others or if they did not they believed in the theory that the white man would carry everyone else, (and you know what president believed that theory, Teddy Roosevelt, a "liberal" by todays definitions,) they did so out of either spite anger or a felling of power, the contemporary left do much the same with random attacks on people often most of whom have done nothing, and will do nothing, they insult people who "supposedly" (often with no evidence) do not agree with them, is that not the suppression of speech, by threatening harmful acts if one does somthing that does not agree with, their consensus, if you think i am incorrect, then please look through tim pools channel he reports on current events or things he deems relevant, -if a hard working man gets fucked by the system is it his fault? you are asking me two diffrent things, if he is fucked by the system then that is the systems fault, it is irrelivent that he works hard, or is lazy, if he can overcome the barriers and fails too, then it is his fault, but that is why we have SOME regulation in place to prevent larger entities from taking and exerting too much control -if someone wishes to give this man tools to protect him against getting fucked by big competitors, why is it always that this gets called "dangerous socialism" define what kind of help, if it is just handing out free money, then that is not only a detriment to the person receiving the help but to the government helping him, if however a person with private charity were to help that would be more effective, seeing as the money would not have to go through bureaucracy, and you would not have to pay extra workers for no reason, if however the government(s) were to introduce laws that protect small businesses without punishing the bigger ones "that" much then it is fine and useful, free money never solves anyones issues, to see evidence look at venezuala, there economy tanked and so in order to support the welfare they printed more money, which caused inflation and an even bigger failure of the economy leading to the current situation "-why is it that countries that are impoverished and underproductive have the hardest working people (and they even export hard working people) with also the longest working hour shifts?" the local employment opportunities that pay well are few and far between, thus big corporate entities move in for cheap effective labour, of course if you have a nationalised economy (russia) then you tend to not have issues with low pay "-Why is it that countries that have applied welfare state policies by broad consensus and not through negotiations have some of the most effective economies, quality of life and development" The united states did not ask for welfare, but beyond that, the reason these welfare states thrive is simple, they have forced austerity thanks to EU law, that is why italy is having, complications as it wants to recklessly expand its welfare state, to the point that the nation would be swamped with debt in due time, this is also why EU nations have strong economies, they are not in debt, and thus (unlike Venezuela) do not need to print excessive amounts of money to pay the bills, and therefore have a stronger currency, as for the economies being productive, well that explains it's self, incentives and half decent pay, and tax breaks for employees (the last bit may or may not be true im not too sure) Why do you say you wish "to educate me" (and therefore assuming that you are right) if all i said is that Right wing people also wish to censor shit? as i said you have a point so let me articulate what i wanted to originally, both consensuses are wrong and right, therefore both should be treated the same, even if one does not support the methods by which they achieve there goal(s)

[@sulimanthemagnificent4893]

@Dragon Dragon yeah it is political ideologies, it became an issue when schools involved politics, left OR right, politics has no bussiness in schools, seems that most of us do not realise that fact, but what can one do but wait and see.

[@originalname9879]

You guys type to much...

[@nikitakrim02]

I am leftist, and I am no joke disgusted by the "good" ending.

[@ardasuar]

a great liberal propaganda