All Physics in Animation vs Physics: The Crowdsourced Version

  Рет қаралды 6,197

Ron与数学

Ron与数学

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 53
@dillpikkle7550
@dillpikkle7550 11 ай бұрын
15:21 wow still can't believe I made a change to a youtube video
@ron与数学
@ron与数学 11 ай бұрын
Hey my friend. Sorry I didn't put your name there because it is not very physics-related but I highly appreciate your input.
@n.v.n.prasad132
@n.v.n.prasad132 11 ай бұрын
must’ve been sad being left out
@dillpikkle7550
@dillpikkle7550 11 ай бұрын
No, it's fine. I've never been a big fan of being put in the spotlight. Never even thought you would respond thrice in a row!
@Maxcraft2013
@Maxcraft2013 8 ай бұрын
It's a pity that they didn't show Maxwell's equations. They would perfectly fit there when he turns on a flashlight
@sunnyd1390
@sunnyd1390 10 ай бұрын
One more slight inaccuracy, at 9:44 when TSC jumps off the (still accelerating) rocket to get the magnet the rocket should just keep accelerating and leave him behind. We know the rocket is still accelerating because bright exhaust is still being produced, very slight error but one which almost nobody caught
@ron与数学
@ron与数学 10 ай бұрын
Good catch!
@anthonyschocke2831
@anthonyschocke2831 3 ай бұрын
Eh, if that was what happened, TSC would just be floating into space forever. Not a good ending for a video, like what they made later.
@dvok7
@dvok7 11 ай бұрын
Damn this must've took a long ass time, I'm still amazed at how accurate everything is even though its just for entertainment.
@Kaelygon
@Kaelygon 11 ай бұрын
So far the best explanation I stumbled upon! Most of the reactions I skimmed through seemed to just name the principles. The spinning rope to linear momentum got me the most confused. I'm guessing how ever you twist the equations, the whole system momentum must be conserved even if TSC is able to generate angular momentum by doing work. I'm unsure if having the platform or the 0.1 friction makes it any more plausible.
@Anpugodofduat
@Anpugodofduat 11 ай бұрын
Oh hello again friend! Sorry I didn't see this before, but I just want to say it looks amazing👊
@AlekzyCrixZBlogout
@AlekzyCrixZBlogout 11 ай бұрын
I couldn't help it, I'm laughing at the nickname "TuMadre8000" as it means "YourMother8000"
@ron与数学
@ron与数学 11 ай бұрын
I want to say sorry to TuMadre8000…
@n.v.n.prasad132
@n.v.n.prasad132 11 ай бұрын
There are two flaws in and around 10:59 : Firstly, you can’t create a magnetic field with solely a solenoid without inducing current through the solenoid. No electricity, no electromagnet. Secondly when TSC’s rocket’s South Pole is attracted to the ring’s North Pole, it creates acceleration and that’s all fine and dandy up until the rocket leaves the ring, where the rocket’s North Pole (rear) gets attracted to the ring’s South Pole (the side just behind the rocket) which decelerates the rocket. You won’t be able to achieve 0.8c this way.
@n.v.n.prasad132
@n.v.n.prasad132 11 ай бұрын
Are you planning on making a second version of this video?
@Maxcraft2013
@Maxcraft2013 8 ай бұрын
Would be more accurate if he removed a battery from the flashlight and power a solenoid with it
@alexanderdavidlocarnogomez3441
@alexanderdavidlocarnogomez3441 4 ай бұрын
​@@Maxcraft2013I would not ask for full accuracy when TSC can survive inside a black hole
@raxusveritas
@raxusveritas 3 ай бұрын
Maybe the rocket's engine has a power alternator that generates electrical current as it burns? Idk man I just played ksp a bunch as a kid
@Real_LeCHL
@Real_LeCHL 11 ай бұрын
11:45 hold on, how are there still stars outside the galaxy? And it even looks like the entire scene is *in* the Milky Way
@ron与数学
@ron与数学 11 ай бұрын
Better to have something in the background :)
@invincirick
@invincirick 11 ай бұрын
I am so so interested in the philosophical angles of this
@ron与数学
@ron与数学 11 ай бұрын
Same
@the2ks382
@the2ks382 10 ай бұрын
for some reason this is terrifying to think about…but its also so fascinating and interesting
@scienceoverload184
@scienceoverload184 11 ай бұрын
At 3:50, while I also considered the conservation of linear momentum as a problem, that would only be an issue if u=0, which it isn't, since then the planet also becomes part of the system.
@ron与数学
@ron与数学 11 ай бұрын
Great catch. The fact that TSC skis smoothly indicate that mu is indeed 0. Anyway, sometimes you have to sacrifice a little bit rigor for the story. It's all good.
@scienceoverload184
@scienceoverload184 11 ай бұрын
​@@ron与数学isn't mu = 0.1 shown at the start ? Anyways, I believe @ghostcat... Whatever that long username was, puts it into words better than I did : )
@scienceoverload184
@scienceoverload184 11 ай бұрын
dreamcastg0hst is the one I meant
@cameroneast8597
@cameroneast8597 11 ай бұрын
@@scienceoverload184 thats one thing about the vid is that friction seems to turn "on" and "off" at will regarding the ice
@wolfyowoz
@wolfyowoz 4 ай бұрын
Like the original didn't gave me existential dread, this video added more to my existential dread I'm impressed with how much details were put into this masterpiece
@akirakilluar
@akirakilluar 4 ай бұрын
Thank you for the all the notes. I’m looking forward to the next video of “Animation vs Geometry”
@indexlibrary2843
@indexlibrary2843 7 ай бұрын
Hella detailed than the first version, though i think the moment TSC enters the quantum world in 18:00, floating particle out of nothing is a reference to virtual particle as he is now small enough to manipulate strings (directly means manipulating particle)
@dreamcastgh0st477
@dreamcastgh0st477 11 ай бұрын
okay, so about the 'problem' at 3:49: it isn't actually a problem that he moves forward when he throws the ball. it's true that it seems like there should be zero net force, but that's only true in the absence of external energy provided to the system. as a hypothetical, imagine he was holding a jet engine, and activated it-- of course he'd move, since there's external energy being provided, in the form of the jet engine's fuel having chemical bonds which are broken down to get the energy. this is the same thing, but it's not a jet engine burning fuel-- the energy comes from TSC, in the form of sugars in his body or whatever breaking down, providing external energy. as for the momentum-- while the friction is low, it's not zero. i imagine that what would happen is, since his velocity is much lower than the ball's, and since he's in contact with the ground, his leftward momentum would be dissipated due to friction much faster, making it so that the rightward momentum of the ball would then transfer back to him, providing an overall rightward motion.
@ron与数学
@ron与数学 11 ай бұрын
Hmm, thanks for your input. 1. Energy conservation is one thing but momentum conservation is another thing. You can have huge burst of energy of the "whole system" without changing momentum at all. 2. Regardless of the friction coefficient, considering the system as a whole, no external force causes momentum change. Think about this way... When the ball flys out to the right, there must be a "force" to "push" it out, why didn't this force push TSC leftwards? However, I do love your idea and I think it practically may work. When it snows in my place, I will do a real experiment on ice.
@invincirick
@invincirick 11 ай бұрын
​@@ron与数学post a video when you do. KZbin physicsq baby
@stevestrom4411
@stevestrom4411 11 ай бұрын
Great video, thanks! Btw, I think it's Nietzsche, not Kant.
@ron与数学
@ron与数学 11 ай бұрын
You are absolutely right. I was confused how can the space fits his name. My mistake. Thank you!
@umcanaldiferenciadoo
@umcanaldiferenciadoo Ай бұрын
I always thought the cowboy hat was a reference to Oppenheimer
@invincirick
@invincirick 11 ай бұрын
Awesome awesome awesome human. If we did make it its because of people like you
@Foreststrike
@Foreststrike Ай бұрын
My personal theorem to life is that everything has been done before, that we can only experience once per parallel universe. Everything we're experiencing now has been experienced before and will be experienced in the future. Surprised you didn't mention the parallel universe and current universe when it came to explanation of the future and past. In fact, I'm surprised the original video didn't go into parallel universes. Steins;Gate would have been a prime example of it.
@thanachart1b10pangpond7
@thanachart1b10pangpond7 29 күн бұрын
9:59 Felming right hand rule comes in play!
@scienceoverload184
@scienceoverload184 11 ай бұрын
At 12:29, what exactly do you mean by pure energy ? Not in the form of heat energy? So all the em spectrum except infrared? That imho doesn't make sense. could you please elaborate?
@ron与数学
@ron与数学 11 ай бұрын
Hey! I was just trying to make a contrast to "matter". The energy can be in any form.
@YRH2
@YRH2 11 ай бұрын
nice more or less understandable, i have no means expert in this field, but the video was amazing. keep it up!
@StopYFGA
@StopYFGA 4 ай бұрын
how about A vs G
@thanachart1b10pangpond7
@thanachart1b10pangpond7 29 күн бұрын
Hyperbolic Space: What. 19:24
@duckie4209
@duckie4209 Ай бұрын
0:30 OH YEAH
@inv_hana
@inv_hana 4 ай бұрын
interstellar is a banger movie
@jjj-ez9js
@jjj-ez9js 11 ай бұрын
🎉cool man ,keep it up .
@elenaszeto9286
@elenaszeto9286 Ай бұрын
2:05 p=1% of the speed of light
@ZacharyBittner-p6o
@ZacharyBittner-p6o Ай бұрын
did anybody else get the space cowboy reference?😅
@stevemendoza3416
@stevemendoza3416 11 ай бұрын
good and AMAZING!
@dibenp
@dibenp 11 ай бұрын
21:41 Don’t know this reference. And don’t wanna give up my Otaku card. 😭
@systembreaker4864
@systembreaker4864 11 ай бұрын
1st😎
Animation vs. Physics
16:08
Alan Becker
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
All Physics in Animation Vs. Physics: The 12 Hr Speedrun Version
22:49
World’s strongest WOMAN vs regular GIRLS
00:56
A4
Рет қаралды 47 МЛН
HELP!!!
00:46
Natan por Aí
Рет қаралды 75 МЛН
Twin Telepathy Challenge!
00:23
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 78 МЛН
Cambridge Mathematician Reacts to 'Animation vs Physics'
30:06
Ellie Sleightholm
Рет қаралды 110 М.
All The Math References Frame by Frame From Animation vs. Math
15:15
Ron与数学
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
Fractals and the Mandelbrot Set
22:20
Graeme Stanley
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Why 4d geometry makes me sad
29:42
3Blue1Brown
Рет қаралды 917 М.
Animation vs Physics - An Over-Analysis
16:15
Gallium-Gonzollium
Рет қаралды 265 М.
What if YOU were made of Light?
9:45
The Science Asylum
Рет қаралды 217 М.
And The Volume of A 0-Dimensional Ball
9:12
Ron与数学
Рет қаралды 5 М.
Full Explanation «Animation vs. Geometry»
10:11
Geometry
Рет қаралды 33 М.
What Animation vs Physics Got Wrong.
4:24
Viz
Рет қаралды 391 М.