Should collaborate but won't happen. We r yet to decide on SSN, IAC 2. Our decision making is at snails pace.
@piyushtiwari10326 ай бұрын
We need 4 Aircraft Carriers 2 Helicopter carriers 30 Destroyers
@samarthpat6 ай бұрын
50 submarines
@pulisrilaxmi66806 ай бұрын
We need 3 aircraft carrier's 4 helicopter carrier 16 destroyers 35 submarine 22 frigate 30 asw corvette
@coolestdude3216 ай бұрын
Yeah carrying 4 "aircraft" is good but having 50+ submarines are "very important"
@nitiishpandey6 ай бұрын
Aur paise?
@pratiknath17126 ай бұрын
We need more MONEY
@roshanchachane1426 ай бұрын
Nuclear propulsion has huge advantages over conventional propulsion. The EMALS, radars, and other electronics need a lot of power. Also, it would take much less time to take fuel for jets than the entire carrier. It saves a lot of valuable time during the war. So, to think that we don't require a nuclear aircraft career just because we have to return to shore for supplies and fuel for fighter jets is naive. The question is, do we want to move in future or just be stuck in the past?
@starizard426 ай бұрын
EMALS is from stored energy in flywheels, which can be powered by nuclear or conventional
@kennethm18325 ай бұрын
The only problem is your future is others' history. You should focus on how to protect your women's basic rights and safety. Stop sexual violence against women and children.
@roshanchachane1425 ай бұрын
@@kennethm1832 So, where are you from?
@venkateshwaranps76886 ай бұрын
Yes very good news about India 🇮🇳 😊
@madhusudanjeurkar31786 ай бұрын
Your postings are really informative. Thanks!
@akaj1886 ай бұрын
Thanks for the analysis on India's nuclear air craft carriers future plans..
@amarjeetbadhani36166 ай бұрын
JAI HIND 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@BPSingh-kn8gr6 ай бұрын
अगर IAC-2 को vikrant-class ही बनाना है तो सिर्फ table पर फाइलों को घुमाकर 2 साल से ज्यादा का समय बर्बाद करने और developing cost बढ़ाने का logic...? और अगर अभी भी IN 45,000 ton displacement category वाला carrier ही चाहती है तो मेरी राय तो होगी इसको flat-top ही रखा जाए जैसा फ्रांस का Charles de Gaulle class है
@deniedchirst6 ай бұрын
I believe money is the only issue.. 50 percent of defense budget is gone in Veteran care and pension.. whatever left is peanuts
@BPSingh-kn8gr6 ай бұрын
@@deniedchirst that's the problem of GOI. Each year, our defence budget to percentage of our GDP is going down and there is no any increase in defence budget. Atleast CAPEX budget should be doubled
@Mr.Evil-0016 ай бұрын
MRFA flashback💀
@Rishabh-ty3gr6 ай бұрын
Not really mrfa has a ton of competing lobbies french, American Russian. This one not much only 2 feasible countries France and maybe sk or Japan. Us is out of question because cost and "human rights abuse by India" Russia is busy in a war with the west in Ukraine, Britain might sell but not sure.
@RaviMishra-bhartiye6 ай бұрын
Jai hind Jai siya Ram
@emotionalIntelligence20785 ай бұрын
Easy to say..ship can be refueled. The amount of time taken and decision affected to steer the ship as per fuel requirements will compromise our ability a lot in the future.
@ranadas33715 ай бұрын
India Navy needs 5 (75 ton) aircraft carrier 3 Helicopter Carrier 50 submarine &100+ antisubmarine AH-60 Helicopter
@HelpingPeolple015 ай бұрын
Just prepare a blue print of a aircraft carrier & give it to L&T 5 saal ke andar aircraft ready ho jayega
@DestinyRulz6 ай бұрын
Apart from existing 2 India needs 2 more Aircraft carriers. 2 in East Coast, 1 in West Coast, 1 kept as backup.
@JayDantara5 ай бұрын
The main attraction of nuclear propulsion is to use it for powering the EMALS launch system for rapid redeployment.
@himanshusingh-bh5kh6 ай бұрын
Great Video & Thanks For Clearing My Doubt 👍👍👍👍
@abhirammani34176 ай бұрын
India also should go for 75ton carrier
@mbv14626 ай бұрын
Yes
@kashyap_0-0_6 ай бұрын
I bet even some trucks loaded for extreme construction would be heavier than that
@deltaandD75166 ай бұрын
@@kashyap_0-0_ bruhh,. 🤣
@Kiviyt3126 ай бұрын
Yep i can provide my backyard for the production free of charge. How long do you think will it take? 3weeks at max?!
@kashyap_0-0_6 ай бұрын
@@Kiviyt312 i think "75 tonne" aircraft carrier can be easily produced in a decent backyard, your free service for Indian Navy is really appreciated 👍
@surendrabarsode89596 ай бұрын
1. Instead of a bigger size and nuclear propulsion, India should go for Vikrant type carrier and scout for a couple of naval bases in Indian Ocean, say with Indonesia on the East and Male or Djibouti or like that on the west side. This will work out as a more cost effective solution. 2. As regards collaboration with France for joint development and advanced technology, that option must be explored and taken forward. We need support of Israel and France ( possibly Japan as well ) as defense technology partners who attach almost no obligations on us unlike USA or to some lesser extent, Russia, And we should surely shun Germany or such other countries.
@WhatThisVideo-WTv6 ай бұрын
Nuclear propulsion ka sabse bada fayeda hota h electricity generation jo ki EMALS system me use hoti h jise conventional engines ko bnane me bohat problems aati hai.
@ZARDSOMSHARMA6 ай бұрын
Well described video. ❤
@HimanshuSingh-og3zn6 ай бұрын
Jai Shree Radhe Krishna 🙏🙏🧡 Jai Bharat Rashtra 🙏🙏🧡
@ManishSingh-xo1fb5 ай бұрын
Since all super security experts are giving their opinion in comments. Here is my opinion. WE NEED ATLEAST 69 Aircraft Carriers 690 Submarines. 34.5 Helicopter carriers And 1 pistol.
@Weddingvishal01316 ай бұрын
Congratulations - good news bromas submarine test 😊❤❤❤
@lachmandass77246 ай бұрын
Four Aircraft carriers are immediately required upto 2035,but actual need is 6 aircraft carriers upto 2050
@souradeepdas71116 ай бұрын
This shows the important of having deep pockets to fuel our R and D. The French consistently tries to improve their efficiency, we instead of building a 65,000 tonnes settled with 40,000 tonnes, conventional powered ACC. Haven't pused for the procurement of Rafale M from France.
@kunalsinha23556 ай бұрын
Jai hind🇮🇳
@hsjawanda5 ай бұрын
In the future, no country other than USA or China will be able to afford to develop truly modern technology completely on their own. If India wants to stay competitive, we have to look at collaborating on future defence R&D with other countries. This reduces the financial & technical risk, while ensuring a bigger market size. When it comes time to sell to other countries (i.e., those not involved in the original R&D), the buyer will be persuaded by the geopolitical weight not just of India, but also of our partners.
@_pankaj_patel_6 ай бұрын
*Good Morning Sir 🌅*
@narujohn69846 ай бұрын
It's not as easy as putting a SSBN reactor in carrier. France has long history operating SSBN, but they faced lot of issues with Charles de Gaulle's reactor. There is a big learning curve for which the first step is to put money on the table. Is the Indian govt. willing to open it's purse strings?
@priyeshrajguru39465 ай бұрын
Vikrant type ka ek or aircraft carrier with electromagnetic launch system ke sath banaya ja skta he i hope navy iske bare me bhi soch rhi hogi.
@nirajdhital49766 ай бұрын
Indian navy should acquire 4 aircraft carrier and 10 helicopter carriers or ambhibious assault ships that should be made in India
@sanjaysarkar61876 ай бұрын
Mai to 2020 se logo k video pe comments karta raha hu ki india ko pang programme join kar lena chahiye with modified s5 class reactor 2030 se construction start karke 2040 me commission karke har decade 1 banake 2070 tak 4 carrier ho jayega fir 2080 se new class ka carrier banalo aur agar har decade 1 banayenge to ek regular ecosystem stable rahega
@CarnageXAddy388z6 ай бұрын
FS PANG,best ACV in modern warships 🔥
@hiteshrohra29916 ай бұрын
Haha true but its expensive
@AnirbanSarkar2036 ай бұрын
For current scenario, we need another AC, more naval fighters & Hawkeye AWACS type naval aircrafts
@ravisunder22046 ай бұрын
We must start building 2 IACs now itself ad it would take a long time to build.
@OMKARKULKARNIorkul19916 ай бұрын
If you really want to disrupt naval warfare of modern era. Work on low cost effective unmanned system both above and below sea.
@vishalchaudhary27106 ай бұрын
If nuclear reactor for SSBN project is in progress then why foreign collaboration is being discussed for SSN project
@knc21116 ай бұрын
India is investing in big ticket naval items whereas threat perception demands we invest in robust anti submarine capabilities. Just one submarine can paralyse the movement of an entire fleet as we saw in 1965 war when INS Vikrant was restricted to Mumbai port due to presence of Pakistani submarine. Indian military planners seem to be going for show and pomp instead of strategic planning based on threat perception.
@sardarhumanist5 ай бұрын
Our immediate requirements 300 more 4.5 gen fighter jets 2 more Aircraft carriers 30 more nuclear Ballistic & Attack Submarines
@RahulYadav-nk6wp5 ай бұрын
Replace migs with naval Rafaels with full ToT
@Ankitcse9136 ай бұрын
India need an nuclear powered also Nuclear strike capable AIRCRAFT CARIER to retaliate far from the bouneries
@freddiealmeida6 ай бұрын
Red tapism Is the greatest foe for our ambition. Following due processes is good but it shouldn't hinder our progress.
@KumarAmarKant-b3r6 ай бұрын
We should collaborate with foreign partners only to get technology and under made in India clause.
@ramnarayanramnarayan2176 ай бұрын
Sabse pehle sarkar ko army ko achchi rifles upalabdh karana chahiye
@sourav95436 ай бұрын
No need to invest in nuclear carrier....3 aircraft carriers of similar Same 64-65000 tonne 3.....Then invest those money to make 4-6 smaller 20-25000 tonne LHD/drone carrier
@ashishr13386 ай бұрын
Jai Hind...Bharat Mata ki Jai...Sir...if we want to be the defacto or atleast the major power in IOR, we will need atleast 4-5 aircraft carriers by 2040-45...after refits Vikramaditya can serve till 2040...collaboration or Joint research agreements will take time, thereafter the actual production will also take time...therefore for IAC-2 we must proceed with enhanced Vikrant-class carrier immediately...for IAC-3 we must continue to work with a newer 65000-75000 tons catobar carrier with inputs from France or UK...IAC-4 can be similar to french PA-NG with nuclear propulsion...the best course of action will be that continue with Vikrant design for IAC-2...some critical technologies for IAC-3, conventionally powered bigger STOBAR/CATOBAR, can be borrowed from French & British designs... finally in IAC-4 we can have a nuclear powered CATOBAR carrier...we must not waste time or wait for technologies to mature or TOT to happen, go for what WE can do while incorporating newer tech on next aircraft carrier
@ericgariba34206 ай бұрын
*India needs atleast 6 to 8 Nuclear Power Aircraft Carriers of 65000 to 100000 Tons with Catobar Configuration, 12 Amphibious Assault Ships, 12 SSBN 12 SSN, Advance Destroyers and Frigates*
@freeclass28596 ай бұрын
Pagal he kya
@AshutoshPuntambekar5 ай бұрын
Bhai ye sab hone mai aaram se 40-50 saal lag jayenge
@prashhdost6 ай бұрын
But can France share nuclear technology with India as it is not a member of NSG
@JAYSONLAWRENCEVAZ6 ай бұрын
BHARAT NEEDS NEEDS NIMITS CLASS ADVANCED NUCLEAR AIR CRAFT CARRIERS, FUTURE. (100000 TONS)
@Abhay-bz5qp6 ай бұрын
We should go for a nuclear Aircraft.
@abhijitgupta90316 ай бұрын
Get the UK one.. it will come at a nice price
@manjulachintu32506 ай бұрын
What if we collaborate and simultaneously work both on collab carrier and follow on carrier of vikrant...by the time both are inducted ins Vikramaditya will be decommissioned and we would still have 3 active carriers meeting our base requirement of 3 carriers❤
@Sudhirkhalkar-f8j6 ай бұрын
Jai hind
@harshith7896 ай бұрын
SSNs are whats needed
@ajeetpatel94176 ай бұрын
Does india have any attack helicopter carrier
@abhishekmaghade69456 ай бұрын
Drdo working on indigenous emals
@saras1026 ай бұрын
Going for stobar again is a bad idea . Atleast they could modify the present design to catobar which will be a stepping stone for future. But here the decision makers put their pocket before such interest.
@MonodeepChakraborty5 ай бұрын
Sir what happened to LCH Prachand is it in production or it just went
@souravdutta67396 ай бұрын
Only aircraft carriers will not make sense. Need 3 CBG to dominate.
@theintrovert8946 ай бұрын
Make video on Underwater Kamikazi drone which is future technology..and capable enough to destroy whole battlegroup and we can easily defend ourselves from china navy..we have seen ukrain claim to strike down russia warship
@james4807M6 ай бұрын
They use boats under water kamikaze were not used. We are testing such kind of autonomous boats. Autonomous boats can be modified for kamikaze role.
@dasbidrohi6 ай бұрын
We are not attacking force .. we are defence force .. we are not going to attack countries far away .. we don't need nuclear powered aircraft carrier .. we should go for helicopter carrier like japan .. also go for submarines.. try new techs
@mnsh12536 ай бұрын
It's not just about deploying an aircraft carrier for offensive purposes; it's about maintaining sea dominance and protecting strategic locations. For instance, the USA sends its aircraft carriers to the Middle East to prevent further escalation of conflicts.
@Mikey147426 ай бұрын
right now India does not intend to move to other seas for attacking purposes but in future Indian navy might have to enter South China Sea so we should have all options available to us on table.
@smokey-ji6 ай бұрын
Sir 🤔 vikramaditya ? Decommissition hoga ! (Make A aircraft carrier need time ) So 🤦 3
@gsmishra34096 ай бұрын
रक्षा,विशेषकर नेवी, के प्रोजेक्ट्स बहुत विलम्बग्रस्त है।निर्णय लेने मे वर्षो लह जाते है।iac, ssn ,subs with api,बहुत पूछड़े है।कही अता पता नही।
@damayantideka54726 ай бұрын
Jaihind.
@rathoreaakash53696 ай бұрын
India should not focus on aircraft carriers, it costly, instead we should focus making more frigates, destroyers and submarines.
@firstcopy84496 ай бұрын
We need at least 1000 Ambani, Adani and more then 1 million Startup
@surinderkumarverma38306 ай бұрын
French nuclear Aircraft carrier is a good aircraft carrier we in India need like this aircraft carrier
@ajitkumar23505 ай бұрын
siraf paisa bachane ko jab modi ne apne third aircraft carrier INS Vishal ka project hi cancel kar diya fir modi france se third aircraft carrier keyon lega bhala ?..actually india ke pas siraf ek hi aircraft carrier INS Vikramaditya hai, jabki INS Vikrant ke pas na fighter jets hi hain na defence ko submarines hain aur na frigates hain..so practically dekha jaye tou indian navy ke paas siraf ek hi INS Vikramaditya aircraft carrier hai.😐😐😐😐😐
@SpontaneousENT126 ай бұрын
But baat to ye hainki France karna chahta hai?? Usse bhi to koi pooch lo
@hirentrivedi86075 ай бұрын
Debate shuru hua he😂
@anshude52936 ай бұрын
When Modi govt sees a big budget proposal, fat jati hai 😂 I dont think this proposal will ever get approved even in the third term. This govt makes a big show but does little. Only consolation is the earlier upa govt did nothing except corruption. So this little something by bjp govt looks better in comparison.
@Pratyush_jena6 ай бұрын
What about welfare schemes? If govt stops them we'll see mass protest by opposition and andolan jivis
@akshay9786 ай бұрын
Yeah bro Congress ke time toh Rafale kharidna ka paisa bhi nah tha 😂 situation usse toh bohot better hai abhi .
@soumyajitsingha96146 ай бұрын
@@akshay978Remember 270 Sukhoi Su 30 MKI
@anamikasingh82326 ай бұрын
@@soumyajitsingha9614 Don't just spill half truth man. Su 30 Mki were assembled in India not manufactured plus don't forget about the royalty taxes paid to Russia. Atlest they are developing their own aircraft now. And pushing for TOT so that they can be 100% made in India.
@anamikasingh82326 ай бұрын
@@soumyajitsingha9614I am an Indian American and its so ridiculous to think that people are adment to remove a government which for once is doing good for the country. If you ever used UPI don't forget to thank which govt. commercialized it and now India does 40% of the Global online transaction. If you are seeing freight corridor built or if you travel to tourist spots and go through newly developed tunnels or if you are refueling the vehicle and the price is under 100rs here in US or Europe or even your neighbor bangladesh or Pakistan have expensive gas that you all have. Or if you see india's stature being increased in international economic groups or if it's new infrastructure or airports or you travel in metros in their 2 cities or when you use apple or samsung products or if you drive a tata or mahindra or if you are traveling through vande bharat express. Or if it's UCC for all or CAA for the minority population of the adject countries or if you see oil and lithium which us produced in india or if you travel to other countries the respect you get when they greet you with Nameste and not Salam Walakum. When an average Indian starts a conversation with pride for it's nation or culture and being patriot or if you travel to planned cities like Dholara or if you take a water metro. Or you see your house helpers using upi and have a permanent home and toilet and etc etc. Remember how much is done by the present government.
@nimaicharan71076 ай бұрын
Ek aircraft battle group cost more than 26 billion.... We should work on alternative chip solution.
@Justshortvids_146 ай бұрын
2nd IAC ke liye fighter jets order ho nhi paa rahe 3rd IAC bhul jao abhi
@MonodeepChakraborty5 ай бұрын
Sir we should now focus more on defence rather than infrastructure. Our defence is getting weaker and weaker day by day
@Naynansh175 ай бұрын
Sabse phle to 100 billion ka defence budget hona chahiye tab kuch hoga nhi to bhool jao
@Kbs_fan6 ай бұрын
Why
@OMKARKULKARNIorkul19916 ай бұрын
Only Make in India.
@ManishPatil-j8m6 ай бұрын
Our system is slow 😔
@vickyjain826 ай бұрын
Not possible next 20nyears, tejas it.self.strugfling, no ssn coming - very weak slowndecision making, solid.r&d apart missiles.missing
@prashantmishra99856 ай бұрын
What the hell is this English?
@GenghisKhan-on2fk6 ай бұрын
na india aur france min aircraft carrier pe koi deal huyi hai aur na hi modi se indian navy ko koi 3rd aircraft carrier milne hi wala hai beshak indian navy ko iski zaroorat hi keyon na ho.🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨
@lonersparadise49476 ай бұрын
Kuch jyada jaldi agaye kya😂
@TheVanquisherGaming6 ай бұрын
🚢⚓
@saiprateek57796 ай бұрын
Aircraft Carrier or Landing Helicopter Docks have their own Battle Groups.. includes destroyers, Fleet support vessels, frigates, Anti submarine warfare vessels, corvettes,submarines,etc., Are we sure that Indian Navy can maintain 3 carrier battle groups with limitted capability as of now? Considering the fact that most of foreign collaborative projects like P75i is still hanging like a towed vehicle with one chain..
@EXPLORADVEN6 ай бұрын
👌👌👌
@abjt_s6 ай бұрын
Whenever this project will see any progress, you will come again and cry about sabse pahle humne video banaya , which will be a LIE as usual 😂😂.
@pv.unmesh32036 ай бұрын
👍🙏🏻❤️🇮🇳
@viewoflife3776 ай бұрын
Bhaiya Akash NG ka kya status hai. Na hi koi trials ho rhe hai na hi koi order aa raha hai
@SenatorRazaRabani6 ай бұрын
You guys every day do lot of talking but at end nothing comes
@kishanrajput71596 ай бұрын
Kuchh log bolte hai ki IAF jets pe foreign weapon kyo integrat kiye Jaa rahe hai jabki Indian option hai .tumhe lagta hai war time sirf Indian weapon production enough hoga Mujhe lagta hai foreign integration achhi baat hai
@tayyabhussain15925 ай бұрын
spend billions of dollars just to meet stop gap.what a joke 😁
@AlphaDefenseHindi5 ай бұрын
Countries that can afford billions dosent find it joke
@Think.twi.e6 ай бұрын
ভারত এই সিদ্ধান্ত নিতে নিতে চায়না অন্তত ২ টা সুপার ক্যারিয়ার ফ্লিট অপারেট করবে আরো দুইটা সুপার ক্যারিয়ার ট্রায়ালে থাকবে।😂😂
@nimaicharan71076 ай бұрын
Waste of money.... Old thinking
@anirban25806 ай бұрын
Sala har jagha kanjusi chal raha hai😢
@mnd73816 ай бұрын
But 2038 is too late! Minimum 2030-32 it should be....
@arnavandromeda40336 ай бұрын
Thanks to Congress govt build vikrant aircraft carrier, modi ji se kuch na ho pyega...all words but no action
@amitat86705 ай бұрын
Gata mera France khud k leye nhi bana Raha India k liye kya khaak banayega😢😂😂😂