American 17-Inch Super Missile Turns Pacific Into No-Go Zone

[@ristube3319]

The new “quicksink” missiles are insane! 1 sinks massive ships in seconds. Wish this channel would cover them.

[@drfranks1158]

there should be rules or common decency to not reuse the same video clip over and over and over and over and over.... jfc.

[@RATTL3R186]

Jfc find something to bitch about. You had to didnt you. Ya just couldn't fucking not watch the video. Nope you are special and had to voice your opinion even though no one cares. 😁

[@Zontics]

Why don't you go start your own KZbin channel and make videos? Then you can use whatever clips you want 👍 stop crying on the internet and go do something useful.....jfc

[@kylethenile]

To be fair, a lot of time with specific military tech, there's really only a few clips of it in the public domain. Don't get me wrong, they could get more creative and use similar (but not the same) clips, but sometimes there are reasons it's the way it is.

[@Jules_73]

At least it’s not ai garbage. The ai voiceover stuff full of misleading info is annoying

[@zromo8994]

Gotta get to 10 mins somwhow

[@bobclavile5653]

As a retired LPD crew member. YOU did NOT show the LPD being struck. That was an old FRIGATE at (7:29) You can fool some of the people MOST OF THE TIME. But not all of us.

[@rhoelg]

you dont need to be a retired crew of or what not to see that was OH Perry class frigate lol

[@LackofFaithify]

the giant line off the stern also hints at the whole moving target thing not applying to the clip they show.

[@originalg335]

@@LackofFaithify that clip is of a previous sinkX. ex-USS Rodney M . Davis

[@nonespecified1398]

The thumbnail of all the added nozzles and combusting fuel was so clickbait-y.

[@darrenblaszka4438]

My understanding is if they show actual wartime footage content creator runs the risk of demonetizing his channel .

[@ekulda]

I DIDN'Tsee the 17 inch 'dis-information' tech for 1 second.

[@phyrhfbr1819]

it's the diameter of the weapon... like battleships used 14" - 18" guns... people misunderstood the title thinking it was a tiny missle... but it's diameter... now you know 🙏🏻🌹

[@ekulda]

@@phyrhfbr1819 all war propaganda is just... Propaganda , until a tag tag army sends the Empire's men in body bags. And then some.

[@V3racious3]

Good to see Dark Tech is still fluffing and dragging out their content for the sake of YT algos 10m requirement.

[@MattttG3]

*dont uou love it!?*

[@Letsberealish]

It's exactly why I'm subscribing

[@Sir_Scrumpalicious]

Don't hate the player, hate the game.

[@V3racious3]

@@Sir_Scrumpalicious Do you tell your wife that each time she sighs at your micro peen?

[@PerLindsten]

Maybe you could provide the correct videos... OR listen to the narration wich explains and delivers whats interesting information...

[@scotty68anderson]

Love the Channels, Dark series. But I have been noticing of the repeating file footage, over and over and over........... Making it a boring video to watch. no thumbs down but not up. just want to be honest. Cheers

[@CockMcBallsddd]

This isn't one of his channels, this is some asshole ripping off and reposting his video. But - I do know what you mean. When the Ukraine war kicked off, I noticed all of his channels putting out a new vid almost every day. And it wasn't necessary. But you could tell he was trying to capitalize on the war fervor. So now he's just making lazy shitty vid after vid. Its really lame, it used to be a really interesting channel.

[@dave-in-nj9393]

rocking back and forth in the waves while at anchor. yeah, guess that is 'moving'

[@richarddeveas4537]

The Marianas is in U.S. Territory! Look it up!

[@grandfrosty]

NOT outside U.S. territory...the missiles are considered U.S. property, and the "territory/jurisdiction" of the U.S. extends to encompass any "properties", wherever they are located in the world. That goes for material assets as well as personnel. That's just how the law is written...

[@bubbafrump74]

I definitely got to see that same clip of that ship enough times to be awfully damn sure that it wasn't moving... well, unless you mean bobbing up and down on the waves!

[@gilsegura8587]

The ship was NOT MOVING! The ship was STATIONARY!

[@jameslanning8405]

It looks like a long artillery shell, with flight fins on the backend! It had to be fairly heavy, to hit and penetrate the ship. It was moving slower than an artillery shell would, because you could see it with the eye, hitting the target. 17 inch diameter, doesn't put it far off in size to the Sparrow missile. But the distance it had to travel may have been different, and its mission was to hit the ship, not a radar site.

[@nativespiritindian8278]

We are Native American and We are ARMY and will ALWAYS DEFEND MOTHER AMERICA

[@captainf1027]

AGAIN, FAKE PICTURE FOR CLICKBATE SHAME ON YOU

[@PlanetTwilow]

1980's Pershing II had a 1500+ mile range, accurate to +/-50ft, packing a nuke.

[@Kr0N05]

This is why I read the comments first before watching a suspect video - thanks! I will not bother to watch it.

[@situational.analysis]

"The successful sinking exercise known as, Sink-x..." Just pour a spoonful of Sink-x down your drain and add cold water. Within minutes, hair, french fries, and old cheese begin to melt away.

[@189Bearshed]

Talks about the Army while using clips of Marines

[@bhdw13]

Yeah, I was going to comment that myself.

[@PerLindsten]

To you to.... Maybe you could provide the correct videos... OR listen to the narration wich explains and delivers whats interesting information...

[@jackwebb5917]

The target ship during the live fire exercise in the Marianas did not appear to be moving, even though it was claimed to be a “moving target”

[@MrGunderfly]

the videos do not appear to show the ship target "moving". the footage shows the ship target bobbing unstabilized with the ambient sea waves. it would be misleading if this footage, shown while talking about this test, (officially portrayed); "this new land launched missle hit a moving target at sea", were footage of the actual(?) test. this footage does not appear show the ship moving except for normal, subtle wave actions.

[@jeffwiggins8923]

The Army did not release the footage, that is old stock video from long ago.

[@thomashenshallhydraxis]

This isn’t even new missile, it’s something he’s used before. But all missiles look the same unless someone really studies missiles; right? 😂 I’ve been studying for a very long time; take the information in this channel like a grain of salt.

[@ChrundleTGreat]

You’re talking about the Army but showing LOTS of Marines.

[@youdodat2]

Who decides what’s in America’s Interest? I’m never asked.

[@frios011]

Made in America baby!

[@GeorgeWashingtonLaserMusket]

17 INCH!?!?! Are we talking Radius?

[@Meower68]

Diameter, according to the wikipedia article on same. Yeah, the stock film clips they're including show something which is NOT one of these.

[@Greg29]

If you actually watched the video you'd have your answer.

[@kathrynck]

Thiccc

[@sidneytrepagnier1038]

Yep, he got us with that false/true advertising...

[@Chainsaw-ASMR]

Did y’all’s think he meant 17 inches LONG?!? 17 inches is closer to an arrow in length than a missile 🤦‍♂️ Don’t fault the title for your own misunderstanding.

[@vernearase3044]

Supplying these to Taiwan will certainly give the PRC pause.

[@kellerweskier7214]

i thought this was going to be on the army's new Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon system (LRHW)

[@rtqii]

The difference between Russia and the U.S. is that Russia brags to the entire world when they figure something out with information supplied by spy networks. The U.S. has had hypersonic technology since the 1960's, the R&D was done by Northrup under Kelly Johnson.

[@ryanlewis8465]

Napoleon Dynamite? If you know, you know.

[@ashleyobrien4937]

621 miles....that's from over the horizon on the sea. I hear they test fired one of these at a Chinese warship, the crew was: Sum Ting Wong, Wi Tu Lo, Ho Lee Fuk, Bang Ding Ow.....

[@mochabear88]

ty

[@pharaohcaesar]

America still has the best military industrial complex. Could you imagine what they could do with 10X funding!😀

[@stillerseas5985]

It’s nomenclature for people who know their ordinance. It’s not civilian language.

[@KupiProdaj-b9b]

dat must be dat super-duper-uber-missile, that you fly when u're high 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@vugu]

Bruh that's as big as me. Yah sure everyone going to stay away from that missile?

[@nmarks]

The beach shown at 0:10 is Kelingking Beach, Bali.

[@adheeshb8874]

Not sure if your pushing propaganda or just poor research, but your information on the inf treaty is incorrect.

[@BaBaYaga1999-p7u]

Source??

[@phyrhfbr1819]

I'm pretty sure this is an a i channel 🤔

[@phyrhfbr1819]

wow many people didnt realize the size of the weapon by title... its 17" like the main gun on the Yamato was 18" its the diameter of the weapon not the length... imagine a battle ship having a tiny 17" gun 😏 now you know 🙏🏻🌹

[@davidjagan2794]

Absolutely

[@rilmehakonen9688]

I swam in the Pacific in July. It's not a no-go zone.

[@georgezofchak6684]

Is this the same guy that narrates dark do ?? Cause they both sound like their on speed when narrating!!

[@NathanDean79]

Much harder to shoot one of these down than a cruise missile. Although we have some cruise missiles that are extremely hard to shoot down because they are stealth or low observable cruise missiles. Like The JAASM-ER. 500+ mile Range its shape and the radar absorbent material The skin is made of make it very dofficult to see until it is too late. The LRASM anti ship missile with a 350 mile range is also low observable.

[@mm650]

Is there a naval-deployment variant of the PSRM?

[@uberlupe1]

Lot's of repetition in this video.

[@MattttG3]

Unfortunately this channel has just turned into clickbait and repeating itself over and over again. This is feeling like a grift.

[@analytics805]

What makes us think these missile batteries will be allowed to set up and launch.

[@ernestvielakokoih8891]

Is the reporter fighting with someone or is he being forced to report? Poor reporting

[@svOcelot]

Y'know, I'd respect this much more if it was true. But the ship, shown several times, is obviously NOT moving (as claimed).

[@hiddentruth1982]

i don't think it would be hard to figure out where it came from with all that smoke and dust.

[@wileycsg]

i was on that ship in 1976

[@Paul-vj8gr]

We do have Healthcare!!!!!!!!

[@kcdiazWTV]

That's what she said.

[@randomthoughts9463]

PLEASE stop using "game changer" - it is an overused term

[@tomwolfe6063]

Cool but could they perhaps make a bit more pointy? You know? Weapons should be pointy.

[@coloradomountainman8659]

0:34. "and with pinpoint accuracy, strikes the moving vessel." Only, there is no wake behind the boat. Hence, it was stationary. So this video, barely half a minute in, has a narrator that is telling us lies. I'm outta here, but will leave a thumbs down and will be sure to never subscribe.

[@Mark4Jesus]

I imagine these require satellites for targeting. I hope nothing happens to them.

[@Thepirireis]

"Cruising" ship with no wake😂

[@kurtamesbury6679]

Moving naval target?

[@tazanteflight8670]

fake thumbnail is scummy

[@cthulholmhastur5317]

Yabba Dabba!

[@airgunbubba2505]

in the first 15 seconds..."Manning the Army's autonomous..." If you have served in the US Military you are accustomed to this level of irony.

[@1956tojo]

In this vid, they only show ships in the water sitting still being hit with munitions... Tou can see the slack in the towing lines on the ship and there's no wake on any of the footage...

[@animejanai4657]

CLICK BAIT once again on this channel.

[@blakemcleroy4812]

Love your channel sir

[@MarkFarrington-hb2ne]

That "moving" vessel didn't have any wake at the bow or at the stern

[@SimonBrisbane]

The target vessel had no wake i.e. it was NOT moving. Either you’re wrong or your video footage is. QA doesn’t exist here.

[@ChrisFord-wh1gl]

I was looking to see who else noticed. The ship is anchored not drifting with the water. They could have just aimed at a coordinate and can’t follow a ship at all. Lies lies lies.

[@butchcassidy9625]

Where are all the negative comments coming from? We all make mistakes, what's going on? I leave for a while come back and all hell broke loose on this channel? Click bait? I've never seen click bait on this channel? I've never seen this channel intentionally try and decieve the viewers. Really?

[@chrishooge3442]

How about the TLAM platform the Marines are deploying in the Pacific. Maybe we should let Ukraine test those for us. It has a 2400km range. A bit of overkill but it would threaten deeper strikes into Russia. Especially against strategic bombers and their airfields.

[@makeupyourmindinator]

Is he saying attackums?

[@UncleKrusty68]

"moving target"

[@Chainsaw-ASMR]

I dunno what they’re talking about , that ship in the intro was stationary.

[@Hi_buddy_waz_sup_]

it's bobbing in the ocean😂

[@apolloaero]

​@@Chainsaw-ASMRthat's just stock footage of other Sinkex. You won't find any video of SM-6 tests in Sinkex or PrSM anytime soon, at least that's what I believe. For SM-6, they haven't released footage of its test against the USS Reuben James years ago, so PrSM being newer will be less likely to release any footage.

[@MrCoors68]

The SM6 does not look like any kind of atacms fuselage. it is totally different design. and that boat wat not moving, i agree.

[@apolloaero]

@@MrCoors68 I never claimed that was an SM-6. My point is that just as we've had live fire tests with other missiles and had no footage reveal, the same is true for this missile. And now for the conjecture, since it has been years since the tests with SM-6 striking naval and land targets with no footage released, the same scenario is most likely with PrSM. It might be years before we see actual test footage of PrSM attacking moving ships.

[@Manny7RM]

17in?

[@SgtScratchnSniff147]

You keep talking about the Army but only show the Marines…not the same branch

[@zx10rabs]

17 inch. Doesn't anyone check your content?

[@gungasc]

I get it he's blind, but that was a lot of marines to show in an "army" video.

[@joshtokelarson8059]

Except the ship they tested on for ship ex wasn't moving on both videos lol

[@emmanuelgenio6583]

17 inch only??? that is just 5 inches longer than a ruler...

[@Apophis1010]

Rulers come in different lengths

[@VIPERNAGZbernardo]

Correction, West Philippine Sea.

[@wojciech3762]

Extra ultra American accent. What region does it derived from

[@mikusoxlongius]

...and everyone wonders where all Our money goes...

[@redavni1]

Lets not forget that HIMARS should be Crusader, but Crusader was cancelled by the poor leadership of Rumsfeld.

[@dawnfreedom2024]

I see....interesting...

[@matthewwagner47]

This looks like something you would see in 1990. These weapons are antiquated. Nothing in this video is shocking the world. All western "Gamechanger" weapons are futile against a peer enemys.

[@dr3wschmurda]

Murica!!!

[@AKSHRASUR]

जय श्री राम हर हर महादेव 🎉

[@brandonboyd5348]

Why does this narrator sound like a nervous serial killer?

[@dcspangler8025]

The other island is called Taiwan.

[@DetroitMicroSound]

Do yourself a favor, don't watch these "Dark" channels. So many issues with accuracy, and often full of propaganda. Especially egregious are many of the videos about Russian hardware, and its capabilities, successes. And there sure doesn't seem enough time in each day for this narrator to read all the Dark channels' various scripts. Pretty sure the narration is AI, but the voice, based on a real person's voice.

[@scottgalbraith7461]

My favorite youtube presenter has a speech impediment. As long as I understand the info, I don't care.

[@jamesdillion8765]

BOOM SHOCKA LOCKA

[@dannypope1860]

Please speak a little more clearly. It’s just a bit hard, sometimes, to understand what you’re saying, and I’m an American… lol.

[@jamesschenk]

Will you people stop using the words game changer its driving me crazy every time i see these its always a game changer its time to quite saying it

[@dalehill6127]

I'd say your comment is game changing and I'm sure every single KZbin channel will agree with me, lol. 😄 Seriously though, hear hear, me too, and yes it's a really annoying cliche.😊

[@mingfanzhang8927]

😊❤😊❤

[@mingfanzhang4600]

😊

[@rjust2297]

The Marianas wow that's a show of force. That boat is obviously not for sail 🤔⛵

[@edbern7387]

The boat was static and not moving another BS video.

[@tommytstang]

Imagine US deploying PrSM at Taiwan, Japan, S Korea, Philippines. The Chinese Navy will never get to leave port. Anyway, I don't watch the videos, just listen to the audio which allows me to continue my work while listening to the info

[@chuckwin5885]

Also don't bullshit about a moving target that's only rolling side to side in the water🤭🤭moving my arse🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@WWG1WGA136]

🙄 when do they ever use actual footage? You have to pay closer attention to understand actual footage is probably classified and will not be released for some time. What's more amazing is that they are still using statistics on the range that was never accurate 🙄 the military does not release the true numbers.

[@MattttG3]

7:10-7:20 *we call them the East Asian Sea and the South Asian Sea* None of them are China's so we don't call them the China sea anymore

[@ThisGuy-79]

Yeah, I'm not going to watch the same clips repeatedly......

[@PeterSWiley]

This is bs

[@christopherbenfield7848]

sorry buddddd, but thats the Marine Corps, NOT the Army

[@Leon1Aust]

What a great capability PRSM cap 2 could do to to become a very long range fast anti ship missile launched from a ship's Mk41 Strike length VLS that would take just 15 minutes to reach a 1000km ranged ship or land target. The Tomahawk cruise missile would take say 1 hour and 40 minutes to reach this similar range. The PRSM cap 2 missile at 17 inches diameter could easily fit into a ships Mk 41 VLS Strike length cell of which is 21 inch diameter and could easily fit length as well.

[@andrewpienaar4522]

This video would have been much more convincing before the NATO equipment failures in Ukraine. Even the ATACMS in this video has had minimal success compared to the Russian grinding war of attraction against Ukraine. It's clear that Russia has the advantage in just about all types of munitions from a 5 to 1 advantage in some munitions up to 10 to 1 in others. With some types of munitions, such as the FAB glide bombs (FAB250, FAB500, FAB1000, FAB 1500 and FAB3000) the Ukrainian have no equal. And before the back an forth of messages, yes Ukraine have JDAM's hidden somewhere but they have no way of launching them, as the few planes they have left can't get close enough to the Frontline to launch the JDAM'S.

[@stephenresler]

I served on the USS Juneau (LPD-10). This is not an LPD. Good informative vid, but the visual is false. Do better next time and don't ruin your credibility. (I use you as a source).