AMERICAN MINUTEMAN III IS STILL THE BEST- REENTRY VEHICLE HITS TARGET 4,200 MILES OR 6,760 KM AWAY !

[@Bizzon666]

From technical perspective these weapons are absolutely beautiful.

[@disgustedvet9528]

This is the insurance program you never want to see used .

[@zaldyfernandez2792]

Your stupidity is showing cover it up pls

[@disgustedvet9528]

@@zaldyfernandez2792 Gosh, at least tell me where I was wrong .

[@ade_adeg005]

May this weapon never be used. Let it remain a deterrent all through its life cycle

most of them only fly 3minutes then burn out as being in a rusting state for many years has made them untrust worthy

[@ade_adeg005]

@ I disagree. They are regularly tested

[@adegbiteadesola3077]

@ America is not bluffing... It has weapons to destroy planet earth

[@ade_adeg005]

@ delivery systems are tested without the warheads. MIRVs are tested in simulations

[@hillaryisorena4283]

@ idiotic opinion 😆

[@bobhoe]

I served my time as a Minuteman 2 missile mechanic

[@theodorekell]

do you glow at night?

[@bobhoe]

@@theodorekell lol

[@danyaudet7444]

respect sir 🙏

[@cliffco6763]

@@danyaudet7444 Respect sir for your service on MINUTEMAN ICBMS. Just in case Russia or China become suicidal. 100 MINUTEMAN ICBMS will effectively destroy Russia or China. 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎

[@ericclausen6772]

Thank you for your service I was Infantry but I think you had a much harder job you and the ones who served in their holes in the ground and in Boomers down deep in the sea.

[@johnhuddleston8647]

Nuclear weapons are one of the greatest ironies in history. The sole purpose of having nuclear weapons is to deter a nuclear war!!

[@EstorilEm]

Negative - the (initial) sole purpose of having nuclear weapons was to end a war and save a few hundred thousand American lives. That goal was accomplished - the political “fallout” and ensuing arms race was a secondary concern (and honestly - was inevitable anyways).

[@jasonmaguire7552]

@@EstorilEm wrong. The purpose of the bombing of Japan was to end the war before the soviet union invaded Japan as the US did not want the soviets expanding their control into Asia. And also to make an indirect threat towards the soviets engaging in any other imperialism generally, often called 'nuclear diplomacy. Intercepted communications revealed that the emperor of Japan was willing to surrender provided Japan could maintain the monarchy. The US could have ended things in this way without the bombings, but Stalin said that if Japan had not surrendered by a certain date they would take matters into their own hands, and the US could not afford to wait for a negotiation with the emperor to end things.

[@simonshotter8960]

@@jasonmaguire7552 wrong again. The Manhattan project was started with Germany in mind.

[@worrier1272]

There the most stupidest things to be invented the end of humanity that's what they are

[@MillerVanDotTV]

@@jasonmaguire7552 and look at Japan now…… Instead they could had cooked like North Korea had they entered the sphere of influence of the USSR.

[@semco72057]

The Minuteman III has been the main defense of the nation for many decades and is still the main offensive weapons system for the nation and is still being kept up to date by the Air Force and that is great.

[@dagger6467]

The Minuteman III Launch Control Center Block Upgrade project is part of the Minuteman Ground and Communications Equipment program, which replaces obsolete and unsupportable ground-based weapon system equipment necessary to continue Minuteman III operations through 2030.

[@personzorz]

I would argue the trident is more important

[@GegeDxD]

​@@personzorz Are you talking about the same trident missile that failed three times in a row?

[@dc174]

Glad their ready...let's hope we never have to use them!

[@levylacambra9510]

Keep those weapons always ready and never hesitate to use them just in case. Hit the enemy first if you want to survive.

[@thebichocr7659]

Wtf

[@davideasterwood5844]

Yes, I agree! You have to be ready to use it if needed!

[@davideasterwood5844]

@@thebichocr7659 why WTF?

[@jasonmaguire7552]

Yes we need to hesitate. If we launch them in any circumstance other than absolutely necessity we risk destroying humanity as we know it.

[@Dan.a.k.a.bradpitt]

@@jasonmaguire7552 no ..Strike first

[@thesuperdupercoolsebassapl4426]

I wish that America 🇺🇸 would keep the peacekeepers missiles as well

[@ThatCarGuy]

I'd argue the Trident 2/D5 is better. It's sub launched so you can't know where it is at all times, it's faster(mach 24 vs mach 23), the Minuteman has a 6000+ mile range, while the Trident 2/D5 has a 7500+ mile range. Everything the minuteman does the Trident does better.

[@j1qqlydixkurayami72]

Yea Trident 2 is better

[@robertseiple9340]

Not to mention that the Trident can host multiple warheads (MIRV) which not only allows it to attack more targets, but it can use "Dummy Warheads" that actually provide "Electronic Attack" capability to jam and/or deceive ABM radars, or that the CEP of the Trident is < 1/2 that of the Minuteman III (not that going from 800' accuracy to 300' accuracy is going to mean a whole lot with a high yield nuke)...

[@ThatCarGuy]

@@j1qqlydixkurayami72 Yeah this video surprised me a bit since the Trident isn't some "classified weapon" and can be easily searched for the majority of its specs.

[@ThatCarGuy]

@@robertseiple9340 Yeah like i said to the other poster on my comment, this video really shocked me when most of the info on both these missiles is not classified and can be searched. I understand we all dont know everything, but a simple search would have shown the video poster wonders.

[@robertseiple9340]

@@ThatCarGuy Actually he is doing a great job, by using the the superlative he generates lots more interest and comments like ours, which in turn gets him more ad money... Marketing is more important than facts! LOL

[@CO84trucker]

What's crazy is people traveling down interstate 80 between Cheyenne WY & western Nebraska don't realize that they've passed within a football field's range of a locked and loaded nuke or two! Look it up on Google earth. It ain't censored.

[@templewilliams1982]

The us military needs mobile icbm launchers

[@DEATHADDA]

US has mobile ICBM's. The D5 icbm is submarine launched.

[@eduwino151]

ohio class ballistic missile subs fill that role

[@nikemac84]

@temple williams Agreed.....

[@kevinkarbonik2928]

they do.... submarines...

[@templewilliams1982]

@@kevinkarbonik2928 I mean on land

[@mikep1176]

Minuteman 3 sites are not directly connected to a launch control facility each facility controls 10 missiles the missiles are spread out miles apart none are close to the launch facility

[@paaat001]

Look up HICCS unless you mean the LF is not physically connected to their respective LCF.

[@theodorekell]

you are not going to live to find out which is better.

[@tfp0052]

Minuteman - The greatest weapon never used!

[@trollmasterstayhigh4209]

@ u don’t know shit wym

[@daleeasternbrat816]

Good! These were made so well so, hopefully, they never have to be used. Nuclear weapons have , probably, prevented at leasr one major war since the Second World War. If none of these terrible weapons are ever used they have served their purpose.

[@Like_Ike]

​@@daleeasternbrat816They're the worst weapon ever developed if ever they are used. The world would benefit from these weapons being destroyed and not these weapons destroying the world. No one wins if these are used so what's the point of their existence. Imagine what man could do if they joined together on a global scale for the good as one nation and stop going for the other guys throat all the time.

[@stevendegiorgio3143]

Excellent missile.

[@freestylebagua]

An incredible machine, I want one. I don't think they will be retired even when the GBSD is ready, it is too hard to make things that actually work.

[@dagger6467]

2030 with the BLOCK upgrades.

[@tigerpjm]

Amazing! Thing does the thing it's designed to do!

[@johnv2232]

This makes me feel better knowing our Country has a missile defense/offense and a nuclear deterrent 🇺🇸🇺🇸

[@juanfermin8173]

Reliability is 🔑!.

[@prof2yousmithe444]

Well done as always!

[@cleusiocabinda8613]

There’s no discussion, Russia leads in missiles technology and the US leads in avionics technology.

[@nonovyurbiznis2408]

Which is why we should start trying to work with the Russians and become an ACTUAL ally to them imagine what we could accomplish as far as science and technology AND Travel ( Space and otherwise) if we ACTUALLY WORK with them.

[@B1GK1NG]

@@nonovyurbiznis2408 I can see that happening under trump

[@ThatCarGuy]

Russia does not lead in anything militarily as they can't afford it. The US has the fastest missile in the world, the ground based midcourse defense which can travel mach 33(source below), the US spends so much money on military, no other single nation comes close. Which is good and bad since they money could be used on things like healthcare, homelessness, etc. Do not listen to Russian propaganda who says the US doesn't have hypersonic missiles and im not talking about ballistic missiles or missile defense. Google AIM 54. Mach 5, air to air missile, carried by the F14, developed in the 60s and operational in the 70s. But this goes against what the US generally likes, subsonic(best maneuverability), sea skimming(under the radar horizon aka stealth), missiles, where Russia prefers faster missiles. The issue with hypersonic missiles is something called plasma black out, the Russians said this was a "plasma shield" which can deflect jamming, radar waves. etc, but then how do you send your radar waves to guide the missile? LOL. Thats how bad their propaganda is, they try to turn a negative into a positive that is not scientifically possible.(source below) "The GBI consists of a 3-stage solid rocket boost vehicle which can place it's payload of an Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle outside the earth's atmosphere. In order to do this the missile must reach an escape velocity of more than 6.9 miles per second. This hypersonic speed is several times what a 7.62mm bullet travels leaving the muzzle of a gun. To put it another way, it reaches a speed of approximately Mach 33." "The US Department of Defense is not concerned that its in-development hypersonic missiles could suffer from a communications blackout caused by a cocoon of plasma. Radioing the high-stakes weapons could be critical, for instance, to abort a mission."

[@nonovyurbiznis2408]

@@B1GK1NG 🤞🙏

[@danyaudet7444]

and the u.s in everything else

[@billkrause4585]

Make this missile hypersonic with dual multiple warheads stacked one on top the other.

[@fightingfalcon1986]

I don't think so. A ICBM with a large number of MIRV or MARV has greater payload and could not only carry more MIRV, but also more penaids (passive decoys and active ECM in order to disrupt or degrade enemy ABM systems, thus difficulting interception efforts). So I think it was a grave mistake to decomission the Peacekeepers and Midgetman ICBM systems. Now the LGM-30 are more of 60 years old, while the peer rivals have more highly capable ICBM force (the Topol-M, Yars and R36M-UTTH with the so-called Sarmat new missile). So I think it could make more sense not only improve the ABM defenses, but also to upgrade the current arsenal with heavier, more capable, extremely reliable and deadly accurate new ICBM's system.

[@Иванпонимаете-г4ш]

You have the new sentinel system

[@AldoSchmedack]

You mean liquid fueled, lol not better at all. What we need are Titan sized ones again. With faster initial lift and bigger payloads. 7x MIRVs at 15mt would send a message esp with say 500-1000 missiles. A few single warhead 100mt+ tipped ones could be done with a Titan and modern physics but only one per warhead. US is moatly at sea btw, 80% of them where they can't be tracked. NATO has plans in place to attack their ground launched within 15-20 minutes. And then they would need to refuel be launch on top of that. Russia would be annihilatedff. 80% of theirs are land based, us 80% on subs. They'd loose.

[@ZXLNT]

@@AldoSchmedack MIRV missles with smaller warheads would provide better penetration and higher destruction. Shockwave overpressure decreases with the square of the distance. Peppering an area with numerous small warheads will provide more destruction over a wider area compared to hitting with TSAR Bomba equivalents.

[@gradientascent4218]

Small ICBM are more survivable because enemy simply needs more bombs do destroy your bombs. Turnsout that if you have heavy MIRVed ICBMs like R-36 multiple of your warheads can be destroyed by a single one. Russins build heavy ICBM not because this approach is superior, but because they are relatevly poor.

[@rainbowsadface4100]

I know why because it will be there in just a minute man

[@mikestanley9176]

Trident III ICBM has entered the chat.

[@kenson-real6280]

Which one is more powerful? Minute Man 3 or Trident Missile?

[@mohdnazreen5892]

I don't know, go study

[@hemmingscable]

Trident with a 450 kiloton warhead but does not have the range of minuteman but don't need it because subs are mobile of course

[@woraphot4980]

Both can destroy the world.

[@Evan_Bell]

Trident II in its standard configuration it has a payload capacity of more than double of MM-3, and as it's submarine launched, its far more survivable.

[@endcapitalism5274]

This ICBM is puny. Voevoda has 10 MIRVs with 1 megaton each. Minutemen has 1 warhead, (no MIRVs due to the NP treaty) of around 300 kT.

[@personzorz]

Look up Trident

[@endcapitalism5274]

@@personzorz Puny. 4 warheads, 300 Kt each.

[@fubarmofo6969]

It’s be nice if your videos showed a lot more pictures instead of a handful with slow motion pulling out of frame

[@dannygjk]

...and here I was worrying about asteroids. 😂

[@ericclausen6772]

I don't think test firing a thermonuclear weapon at this point in time I realize that countries should test their systems but right now is probably not such a good thing.

[@KKEM641]

In this case the re-entry vehicle is non-nuclear and all they are testing is the rocket. All nuclear testing is banned.

[@johnnyd2383]

Ballistic.?? Those are obsolete... easy to destroy in an early phase of the flight.

[@rrp54q95]

Oh your so smart, yes they still serve their purpose

[@maninthemiddleground2316]

Wow ... 9950 miles 😱 Put some on west coast and some on east coast you can reach almost any part of the world. Only some part of thw indian ocean are out of reach I would think 😅

[@henrytuttle]

I don't think that's a coincidence.

[@maninthemiddleground2316]

@@henrytuttle true 👍☺️

[@drok836]

Russian sarmat 2 is 18.000mph fast lmao, and it carries 10x more megatons that the minuteman

[@redblinddog]

MM III is restricted to 3 Warheads but can carry at least 3 more or 6 total Warheads. We do have in the works a replacement system but with Biden in the WH who knows if it will be expedited into service by 2030. Note: Not only have the Russian systems demo about a 30% failure rate of the launch vehicle their Warheads also have similar failure to detonate triggering system. One of the issues the POTUS Trump had addressed was the US aged and compromised triggering system to bring them back up to the 95% range. CCP/PLA systems are not well understood, and their reliability is not known or at least not much has ever been published about their Strategic nuclear weapon systems.

[@drok836]

Sarmat-2 enters the chat

[@nesseihtgnay9419]

That's why America is still using there's while Russia has to upgrade to the sarmat

[@fromthe508brocktonma9]

USA has classified nuclear weapons says Trump and US generals

[@cleusiocabinda8613]

You know minutemen has been upgraded multiple times too, right?

i have never seen a minuteman last longer than 3 minutes they fizzal out with corrosion

[@blinkbernardino3135]

Minuteman III would make China a giant parking lot.

[@paulaubuchon2336]

What LF was this launch done from. I worked on them and did final inspection for launch authorization.

[@solidlift]

LF-04

[@jamesbutke1438]

@@solidlift what flight?

[@Tiagomottadmello]

Great video !!! 👍👍 I really do like this channel a lot !!!

[@theodorekell]

oh, gosh... Russians also test their empty missiles and hit targets 7K miles away. I wish they send one packed with caviar, near my home

[@Pw6872]

Narrator is clearly talented at what he does, but for certain topics, this one included, his voice is inappropriately lilting, upbeat, and cheerful, and does not lend any gravity to the topic being discussed.

[@FranktheDachshund]

The air force chief of staff is named Charlie Brown!

[@rinneganitachi4840]

Put that thing in a museum... it never was the best it carries 3-4 warheads with no countermesures it looks pathetic when compared to 200 tons Sarmat icbm

[@rrp54q95]

You mean something that is still under design?

[@rinneganitachi4840]

@@rrp54q95 Nope they alredy tested it its not under design they are replacing the vojevoda or as nato calls it satan 1with the sarmat icbms... even the vojevoda is almost 100 tons and makes the minuteman look pathetic

[@rrp54q95]

lol yes because the size of the explosion is important... sounds like you think its better to kill civilians...

[@virginccyy7645]

The sarmat has only what 5 missiles...the minute has 450 from 1970. It's still more numerous and accurate than sarmat. With being half the size

[@rinneganitachi4840]

@@rrp54q95 lolz why does US and Russia target every major city ?Because yes its a friking nuclear war and everybody dies !

[@Evan_Bell]

By no metric is the LGM-30G the "best" ICBM. It doesn't have the highest payload, highest speed, longest range, highest survivability.. It's old and slated to be replaced this decade.

[@robdixson196]

Being able to hit a target makes it functional, not necessarily the best. My car started this morning, then i drove it somewhere and it didn't break down. Clearly my car is the best the best car EVER!

[@matthewhuszarik4173]

The minutemen missiles are also some of the most accurate ICBMs. They don’t need a huge warhead because they can hit a particular building if desired. Perfect for a first strike to cut off the snakes head.

[@zlatko359]

i think that SARMAT is the best ICBM in the world

[@GegeDxD]

Well, everything American is best as long as it's not used on the real battlefield.

[@jayc2469]

Isn't it Thiocol

[@cascadianrangers728]

Peacekeeper was objectively superior

[@Jason987262]

lets hope they never have to be used

[@AdenStaggers]

You may claim be that Minuteman III is the boss. However I disagree the real true "Boss" was the LGM-118A Peacekeeper( Missile Experimental-MX) "Cold Launched" with CEP (gymbal sphere) capability far exceeding Minuteman lll. Up to 12 MIRV'S with chaff & decoys and other countermeasures. "First Strike Capability" In my opinion and estimation the USAF should of never deactivated the 50 MX's that were on alert! Also what would have been very cost effective for the nation would have been slow replacement of the 400 or so Minuteman III with MX. If this was implemented America would have had a extremely powerfull deterent that would of been younger in age then the current Minuteman III force. Also America might of not had to field Sentinel at the time of this writing Real talk....

[@marcosmarimbondo7581]

Viva a Síria

[@ajokpaniovojoel1049]

If minuteman is the best what will you say of Russian Sarkar which Americans named Satan 2?

[@ajokpaniovojoel1049]

I mean sarmat

[@ade_adeg005]

@@ajokpaniovojoel1049 it was named Sarmat because of the nuclear yield. Its devastating. US nuclear war heads are dialable or dial-a-yield or variable yield. Not sure if Sarmat has such functionality

[@JamesLaserpimpWalsh]

Well......If it did have failures we would not be told would we. Think about it.

[@livefreeordietrying7242]

I'm more then sure we would hear about it since there are so much people who look for any small thing to call out in The MIGHTY AMERICAN ARMED FORCES.🦅🇺🇲🗽

[@livefreeordietrying7242]

@ That's what we AMERICANS want the fools to think and what they will think until they have to be uesd.

[@chrismartin9755]

MIRV not MERV

[@Curvyblackbeauty]

Having the best ICBM would not help much if every countries that has them in operational units is immune to interception, it just means that US, Russia or China would obliterate each of if anyone strikes.

[@throwaway9279]

@The BIZ u mean buttplug?

[@warmachine1770]

US always ten steps ahead of everyone…so don’t count on it.

[@JDDC-tq7qm]

​@@warmachine1770 lol whatever Russian Sarmat is stronger than weapon USA has 😂😂

[@AldoSchmedack]

*_THAAD has entered chat_* Hold my beer...

[@neilruedlinger4851]

@@JDDC-tq7qm Yeah sure, the world has already witnessed how the latest and "stronger" Russian armor was quickly turned into junk piles, by the Ukrainian military, using Western 1980's technology. I doubt the Sarmat will be as reliable in real combat situations as the Minuteman III. I don't think you're aware that when the USAF test launches a Minuteman III, they pick out one Minuteman III at random deployed in one of the Minuteman III bases, say in Montana or Wyoming, transport it to Vanderberg AFB in California and do a test launch. There's never been any major malfunction that has prevented any randomly selected missile from delivering its war heads right on target.

[@johnv2232]

As an American🇺🇸 appalled at what Putin and Russia are doing to Ukraine and making nuclear threats to our Country and NATO I feel better and relieved knowing we have this ICBM defense! Thanks to everyone who has worked on,manned the silos and maintained these missiles to protect our Country! 🇺🇸Very much appreciated💪💪

[@RicKyngs]

glad you're happy bit I'm pretty sure russian sarmat is far far more advanced than minuteman 3

[@marcosmarimbondo7581]

Viva a Corea do norte

[@myhomecountryindia5618]

World : There is no doubt that US has got the best nukes compared to the rest of the world. Meanwhile ( India ) : let's not care about these advancements and let us continue our light saber project 😎

[@abinmohan3675]

What light saber project?

[@stephin1612]

@@abinmohan3675 screat 🤫

[@markbenjamin1703]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/rnSZe2eKlM2Igck Already done in America

[@myhomecountryindia5618]

@@abinmohan3675 I meant directed energy weapons lol😂

[@myhomecountryindia5618]

@@markbenjamin1703 lol✌🏻😎

[@antonkosmas7179]

Russian Sarmat travel faster than US Minuteman3

[@jshepard152]

In theory. The last year has demonstrated the rot at the heart of the Russian military. In a real war, Russian weapons systems are going to fail at high rates.

[@marioshadjikyriacou3381]

Dream on!!

[@johnv2232]

USA missile defense!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💪

[@jamesmerkel9442]

Shutting them all down no test launches allowed my planet my rule. Leading by example no county allowed test launches of long range missiles any more.

[@rickmckee8270]

The US regulary pulls a titan 3 ICBM remove the nuclear payload and launch them then watch the MIRVS hit their targets.

[@eliasmakori4539]

It should be made hypersonic

[@MaxVerslappin48]

It is on renetry

[@auro1986]

or you can fit missile with re-entry vehicle from new missiles made for submarines

[@auro1986]

@@Naveenkaroliya as if france gives a rats ass to india

[@ThatCarGuy]

Look up Trident 2/D5. It's sub launched, it's faster(mach 24 vs mach 23), the Minuteman has a 6000+ mile range, while the Trident 2/D5 has a 7500+ mile range. Everything the minuteman does the Trident does better.

[@auro1986]

@@ThatCarGuy they don't have interchangeable parts?

[@ThatCarGuy]

@@auro1986 What?

[@klardfarkus3891]

Is the military replacing these just to spend money?

[@jamesmerkel9442]

I will not hve any silo fixed missiles 65' is over. Not 1 fixed missile silo.

[@Mungobohne1]

I prefer the bulava

[@nikemac84]

Bruh, the Ruskies say they can intercept this missile with their S-400 and/or S-500. Is that true???

[@larrysmith2485]

Maybe, but in the event we ever launched them over there would be too many coming in to stop them all. These would be launched so would the trident sub launched, then the Bombers would be launching simultaneously. They would be overwhelmed, but we probably would too.

[@woraphot4980]

Impossible. Technology of Russia is still 10 years behind USA.

[@JDDC-tq7qm]

Sarmat is much superior than this thing 😂😂

[@raquelobiado9061]

if im president Donald Trump i will pretty test this weapon to China we will see if it's work properly 😂 😂 😂

[@andrewlambert7246]

What is best? Everything the USA makes is the best? A missile developed in the 1960s cannot be in anyway or form be compared with a missiles built recently i.e. composite rocket motors etc. There are other missiles that are better than minute man other than the Russian missile. Luanchers are not needed today inorder to validate reliablity. This is done with computers i.e. health monitoring of systems etc.

[@kludgedude]

Can they put hypersonic glide vehicle on these things?

[@chriswilton9976]

Yes: that is part of the modernization updating.

[@teddy.d174]

Yezzir

[@ThatCarGuy]

No need, it already goes mach 23, the Trident 2/D5 which is better in every way, goes mach 24(while be sub launced). The US also has the Ground based midcourse defense which is the fastest missile in the world at mach 33. The US has developed a really good propellent that is comparable to ramjet/scramjets. "The GBI consists of a 3-stage solid rocket boost vehicle which can place it's payload of an Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle outside the earth's atmosphere. In order to do this the missile must reach an escape velocity of more than 6.9 miles per second. This hypersonic speed is several times what a 7.62mm bullet travels leaving the muzzle of a gun. To put it another way, it reaches a speed of approximately Mach 33."

no chance as the rusting missiles are outdated and full of corrosion

[@Desta102]

if it's the best try Russia

[@anicetobarragan7267]

Sarmat 2 missile is better.

[@marcosmarimbondo7581]

Satan II

[@deansacca781]

Russia's hypersonic-glide vehicles have something to say about that.

[@willwozniak2826]

If they work then yes....the mighty Russian Sarmat or Satan II fell apart on one of its recent tests....once The Americans get it right, watch out world!...the Americans really dont need them..haha. Russia dont know how to maintain squat....

[@mingkwong9277]

Not according to the Satan

[@jorgesoto4799]

Wait till next year when the Avangard it will be 20 icbms with 15 multiple nuclear missiles each,

[@comatosed911]

an lil minute baby is outdated by decades ...i highly fucking doubt its still the best reentry vehicle with russia having bigger better an faster more updated nukes

[@jacapopol6382]

I just came by to laugh, lmao, k thanks bye

[@andrewlambert7246]

How does he know that the minute man is the best missile in the world? In other words aircraft and airfields can be attacked while they are parked on the ground. India Agni missile according to the Japanese has cep of 40 meters which seems to be better than the minute man 3.

[@tekthappa5497]

But Indian Agni 5 missile is far behind in range just 8000 km so how can that be world's best missile

[@marcosmarimbondo7581]

Viva a Rússia

[@nematjumayev7905]

САРМАТ1💪🕯

[@marcosmarimbondo7581]

Viva a China

[@blessmysoul8930]

Proudly brought to you by cia propaganda program.

[@Ptolemy38]

60 years old it got rusty

most of them dont fly they are full of rust and corrosion sitting in the silos full of water

[@hillaryisorena4283]

@ another expert without knowledge 😆

[@cliffco6763]

@ Your stupid. All MINUTEMAN ICBMS are regular maintain and updated. Its mandatory part of US military budget. 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎

[@Ptolemy38]

@@cliffco6763 mentainance. I can do. To a bike. It doesn’t mean. Can perform. To. Recent. Technological. Defenses. Is outdated. 60 years old.

[@cliffco6763]

@@Ptolemy38 Wrong. The Minuteman ICBMS are regularly updated where necessary. For example, faster computer hardware and software installed in Minuteman ICBMS. Improved updated guided systems installed in Minuteman ICBMS. It simply is good reliable ICBM. Don't need much maintenance. Hope we never have to use it. Too destructive killing machine. 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎

[@cg3.0_slowburning2]

Laughable

[@sunlightspear7000]

How so?

[@cg3.0_slowburning2]

@@sunlightspear7000 it's not the best Russia has the SARMAT everybody knows that's the best nuke in the business.

[@FranktheDachshund]

@@cg3.0_slowburning2 Considering Russia's performance in Ukraine, I question they have the best of anything.

[@araujofi]

Oh Please, Yars and Sarmat are way better

[@marcosmarimbondo7581]

Kkkkkkkkkk

[@japutaruko8052]

This just bullshit. Everyone knows Russia has the BEST ICBMs in the world.

[@rickmckee8270]

It does not matter both systems will do their job and destroy every city they target.

[@roberto2142]

they are not the best by far. Made in 60/65/70. Today you have more modern, faster maneuverable re-entry missiles. They are actually obsolete.😂

[@Tarquin67]

Ohhhhh……so Russias Hypersonic Nuclear Missiles, able to be launched from any platform, and unable to be detected until too late, are not more threatening than 50 year old technology?……And your use of “THE BEST” connotation is repulsive. How can ANY nuclear capable weapon be the “BEST”?……..They should all be banned, and not venerated by the warmongering USA.

[@Basil1982]

Τhe answer is Satan 18