How the RS-28 Sarmat 'Satan II' Works: The World's Most Powerful ICBM Explained

[@mpekawoods]

That's why the US can't find OIL in Russia

[@osondufuture101]

No! That's why they can't bring democracy to Russia! There's already oil😂😂

[@paperdreams355]

​@@osondufuture101 have usa demokracy ? 🤔

[@d-fens7173]

@@osondufuture101 i was just thinking to write that and i saw ur msg hahaha

[@ronaldmcdonald5299]

Lol rusian empire is old europian conqueror. But alway lose there war and run. 😂😂 lose to japan

[@Angelofel]

😂😂

[@ReynoldsJer]

One of the reasons America has not found oil and human rights violations in Russia

[@amateuramateur250]

It's funny, in the US itself citizens have not had any rights or freedoms for a long time, maybe Americans should discover this fact before worrying about Russia?

[@buzzafrique3700]

😂😂

[@jozefhorvat3625]

​@@amateuramateur250 Absolutely true 👌👌👌👍👍💯

[@jonesmorales-tu6kq]

They didn't take a drop in Iraq

[@dz7786]

@@amateuramateur250 🤣 tell me what's not free🤡? How come Russia arrest people for even filming video of destruction in Russia? Don't you dare mention the word war in Russia 🤣 the Russian people live in one big prison under their coward dictator 🤡

[@rigilkent8681]

goosebumps. Scary to know those weapons really exist and the destructive power it brings

[@erdnaxeL]

They don't exist. 🤣

[@ExtraExExemplar2025]

​@@erdnaxeL It's called Propaganda of Terror (in countries at war with each other) or Overton Window.

[@ExtraExExemplar2025]

If there were really weapons of such destructive magnitude (Since 1945) none of us would have been born. Military propaganda claims that since 1945 they have conducted thousands of nuclear tests, so the Earth's atmosphere would be saturated with radiation and carcinogens due to the decay of radioactive material exploded by nuclear warheads. Also, one must keep in mind that the Presidents of each country in the world are not sufficiently aware of their actions, so one must ask how long would it have taken them to wipe out all life on Earth since the discovery of thermonuclear/hydrogen weapons? It's all a show that has lasted over 70 years. People are gullible!

[@MrJetMango]

its not a weapon. its a tool for human species suicide. weapons are used to win in a battle or war. this makes everyone lose everything.

[@lNamelessl]

Оно не только существует, но и запустится по целям без участия человека, если управляющие центры будут уничтожены... Принцип "мёртвой руки", если я правильно его называю.

[@resulovayolu640]

So that means everyone has to think not twice maybe ten times before taken slightest action against Russia Well that’s what I think

[@claus86]

No my friend is not about think 2 or 10 times is just to think that if that thing is armed and in the air millions of people will die in the next 30 minutes and nobody can do nothing to stop it That is to think about

[@kdennis9115]

​@@claus86 Mr. Scott Ritter has always mentioned this that NO ONE wins in a nuclear war.

[@SoulRocketMan]

If the US used atomic bomb to end a war, Russia can also use its nuclear weapon to end a war even if no sides will win, does it even matter for Russia? I don't think so.

[@timonsolus]

@@kdennis9115: Maybe Planet Earth wins. Planet Earth would be much better off without the billions of humans infesting it like a plague and making hundreds of other species extinct. Look at how the wildlife in Chernobyl thrived after all the humans left!

[@dz7786]

@@resulovayolu640 🤣 the amount the US spends a year solely maintaining its nuclear program Russia spends on its entire military budget 🤣 hate to break the news to you but Russia doesn't have half the operational nukes they claim to 🤣

[@batman_2004]

Tells you how dangerous are ICBMs. Just pray these weapons are never used.

[@ashishIMpro]

The reckless geopolitical games world leaders plays ensures that it will inevitably be used if not immediately.

[@canadiantrucker9574]

Israel and Iran keep playing around, I bet we will find out

[@Иван_Иванович]

Просто молитесь, чтобы политики Запада закончили вооружать неонацистов на Украине.

[@SoulRocketMan]

What about praying for NATO to stop provoking Russia? Isn't it more sensible?

[@shidohihiho]

Already been used against Ukraine... if you didn't noticed.

[@Иван_Иванович]

Ох, мы столько всего можем сделать из стиральных машин)

[@PanKopecky]

А если ещё посудомоечные машины распотрошим и микроволновки? 😂

[@Иван_Иванович]

@@PanKopecky Тогда, наверное, получится титан класса "Император")

[@PanKopecky]

@@Иван_Иванович, ну пошёл же тренд по сети, что Россия - это Империум человечества ;)

[@erdnaxeL]

а из унитазов?

[@Иван_Иванович]

@@erdnaxeL Так это ВЫ нам расскажите, носители кастрюль! Поговаривают, что в освобожденной от ВСУчек Ольговке их-то и недосчитались ;-) Кста, а как там "Курск за три дня"? Так же, как и "Крым до лета", м?)))

[@alispeed5095]

Yep, thats why no WMDs were found in russia😂

[@imadpack8845]

And oil too

[@aliwalil4160]

Underrated commend :D

[@NimsChannel]

It always weirds me out. The Republicans have basically just been saying keywords for decades. I told a co-worker this, he said what do you mean? I said Nancy Pelosi, and he said beep that beep. lol. Then I said see? But he did not understand. It makes no sense because they've been doing it since forever. I remember being a kid and hearing Bush repeat weapons of mass destruction every couple sentences. I realized it was a bunch of bull back then.

[@mrthunderhawk]

@@BinarySoundsthis comment section is so laughably stupid it hurts

[@alispeed5095]

@@BinarySounds Yeah, and thats why russia simply has better engineers. With just a fraction of the US budget, they are able to create technological marvels like Sarmat. That deserves respect. And best of all, such weaponry protect there sovereignty.

[@muhammedrahman7013]

"Say Hello to My Little Friend" And Goodbye! ❤️🇷🇺❤️"From Russia with Love"

[@madstanwan]

I'm not sure "with love" is the right choice of word when you consider the nuclear response Russia would face if this were ever used. It's scary, but so is MAD.

[@ЖюльВерн-ц1и]

​@@madstanwanВсем хорошо достанется.

[@johnniblueeyes2786]

To be clear:- Satan-2 is one of several new nuclear delivery systems Russia has developed with the aim of overcoming evolving U.S. missile defense capabilities. The silo-based weapon measures 3 meters in diameter, 35.5 meters long, and weighs 229 tons-making it the heaviest ICBM on the planet once it enters service. The liquid-fueled missile boosts in three stages, allowing it to accelerate to a peak velocity exceeding 20 times the speed of sound as it arcs towards targets up to 6,800 to 11,000 miles away depending on payload. A successful test in April 2022 saw an RS-28 traverse roughly 3700 miles in 20 minutes-equating to an average speed of Mach 14.5, or over three miles per second. The Satan-2’s “bus” can accommodate up to 10 tons of weapons including 10 to 16 separate nuclear warheads (known as Multiple Independent Reentry Vehicles or MIRVs), which can spray out to accurately attack separate targets, multiplying the number threats a defense system has to overcome. A typical Russian heavy MIRV might have a yield equivalent to 750 kilotons, or 50 times more powerful than the Little Boy bomb dropped by the U.S. on Hiroshima, Japan in 1945.

[@jozefhorvat3625]

Absolutely true 👌👌👌👍👍👍💯💯💯

[@texavery711]

What are you a nuclear engineer?

[@scatmanz2496]

Thanks... what a specific education to learn in one minute..

[@bikechainmic]

Blah Blah, yawn...really , liquid fuel? No wonder they blow up in their launchers! Couldnt be arsed to read all your "sales pitch" guff mate

[@karamba69]

@@bikechainmic хрюкни, приятель

[@SamoSloga]

This rocket never failed at launch. 4/4 from the testing trials. If this one gets launched, we are doomed.

[@gintasvilkelis2544]

What are you talking about? This missile had 3 complete failures and 1 partial success. Not a single full success.

[@bikechainmic]

While theyre messing around with old liquid fuels I am not bothered by their "sales pitch"

[@kalin3430]

@@gintasvilkelis2544 it was Bulava that failed not Sarmat.

[@Lipi19821]

​@@gintasvilkelis2544 1 is all it is needed anyway...so maybe people should not take as beeing safe... btw afaik it had 1 failed lounch.... Tridend had 2 or 3 just in past 6 months

[@galimbertino4939]

@@kalin3430 yes,but you know, it does not matter on internet if it is true or if it is false, they just need enough people to repeat it so it become the truth...on internet.

[@deanmoxom1330]

Pride of a nation

[@МаксБакланов]

Русские вовсе не гордятся этим. Мы просто хотим чтобы с нами считались. И ещё мы увидели что равноправие с западными "партнёрами" - это не то что хотят наши "партнëры".

[@abirmahmud3809]

Pentagon Must be Watch this😮

[@nikitap.2140]

Пентагону известна информация о каждой такой ракете, я уверен, все шахты, места базирования мобильных комплексов ракетоносителей, всё отслеживается со спутников, стоит только вылететь такой ракете уже через несколько секунд о ней будут здать в пентагоне, другой вопрос как эту ракету сбить с курса, на сколько я знаю спутников с РЭБ для таких ракет не существует, полетит просто в ответку такая же.Поэтому эта штука маловероятно куда-либо полетит, чисто как сдерживание.

[@gintasvilkelis2544]

Yes, and Pentagon has seen that this missile so far has not had even a single 100% successful test. The Soviet ICBM expertise was located entirely within Ukraine, so it's been inaccessible to Russia since 2014.

[@TerryButterfield]

@@gintasvilkelis2544 25% successful test rate (1 in 4).

[@erdnaxeL]

Она сама себя сбивает.

[@АлексейЧернов-б8в]

@@gintasvilkelis2544 😁😁😁🤣🤣🤣 украины 🤣🤣🤣 .. тогда тебе не о чем беспокоится.. спи спокойно, дорогой товарищ 😂😂😂😉

[@mymy4110]

every country should have this - end to Americas endless wars and global chaos

[@KSmithwick1989]

Why, so they can have them explode on the ground during testing.

[@PanKopecky]

Oh, we have more than enough, instead all other countries. Don't worry. 😂

[@KarelChytilArt]

😂😂

[@muhammedrahman7013]

The Evil Satan Destroyer! ❤️🇷🇺❤️"From Russia with Love"

[@scatmanz2496]

Woooooow... It is a very well-educated and professional video in a few minutes .... Learn something here... thanks.

[@KSmithwick1989]

Did you learn about the RS-28 that blew up its lauch site last month, in September?

[@duboshlt8646]

This is special for America !!! From Russia with love😂

[@Anusree14324]

Russia❤️‍🔥

[@MAESTROLIDER]

Спасибо большое за интересное видео 😊

[@imbangperdana838]

Good news Russia have this

[@RandomosityRendezvous-qi2ve]

Exactly when US makes these it's pride of engineering in "safe hands", when other countries makes these then it's a threat to the world

[@coolcat6303]

Nope

[@RandomosityRendezvous-qi2ve]

@coolcat6303 why when us have these womd no one cares they are in "safe hands" but when us opposing countries have these they are a threat to world peace on what basis they can say this other than just because they can bark

[@magellanmax]

This is the reason why NATO troops and tanks are not driving on Moscow & St. Petersburg streets.

[@icecold9511]

Dude, MAD has been around since the 60s.

[@stargate2002]

MAD only works if both sides are sane. The US regimes and its Deep State are insane. God help us.

[@lrgege5854]

Why would they need to? Russia would fold in 3 days in war Vs NATO

[@charlespryor7275]

NATO will retreat from Ukraine and i bet they wish they never entered into the conflict that NATO made into a WAR, Now North Korea is aiding its friend and others will come to aid Russia just as NATO countries came to Ukraine’s aid not to help or aid Ukraine but out of greed and their long wish of taking control of Russian assets. American and UK planeed after WW2 to drop 20 atomic bombs on 20 Russian cities. Greedy deluded, ignorant evil leaders. They attacked Japan with 2 bombs they had no need to drop. There is a five Sletter word for them begins with C++TS

[@rodg011]

@@lrgege5854 wow ;you really live in a fantasy world,nato is getting an ass whoopin in Ukraine right now

[@jacksonlucas8566]

you are the best! make more videos of the Russian arsenal like S-500 and kinzhal

[@MrGhost92-m5z]

No one country missile can intercept this sarmat icbm russian had one new Icbm Avangard mach 27 that more is dangerous

[@shamanbhattacharyya9285]

Avangard is not standalone ICBM... It's a hypersonic glide vehicle mounted on an ICBM, like the RS-28. I am not sure if the RS-24 Yars can also be used to deliver the Avangard. Oh and don't forget the 2 Megaton nuclear payload the Avangard can carry (directly to Zelensky's front doorstep 😂😂)

[@GlobalWave1]

I don’t think anyone can really intercept any ICBM that I know of. Russia keeps building these things because that’s all they got.

[@глебновиков-ъ5ъ]

@@GlobalWave1 скорее потому что это самое эффективное оружие для остужения головы

[@icecold9511]

​@GlobalWave1 As a practical matter, no. The US, ladt i heard, has the ability to intercept 20 or so. Maybe a few more now. The missile defense was never exoected to stand up to a general nuclear war. It was intended to use against rogue nations like nk or iran.

[@rajaydon1893]

​@@GlobalWave1its what they do best so why wouldn't they

[@wolfdima]

Давайте молиться, чтобы такое оружие никогда не пришлось применять.

[@АлександраК-т5л]

Пусть амеры молятся)

[@МаксимС-ф2с]

Пусть натовцы молятся, испепелим их в ядерном апокалипсисе

[@rufufo]

Конечно не придется применять, так как она взрывается еще до старта 😂😂😂

[@AngryHamster-x8l]

​@@АлександраК-т5лОближи лучше🍌

[@онлимьюзик]

​@@AngryHamster-x8lНа жёлудь🐽🐖

[@suzibillball]

Oh, I enjoyed this video for sure . . .

[@alimohamd3051]

روسيا 🇷🇺 قوى عظمة لاتستهان بها

[@Alfa-FSB-Agent]

Cool vid, but you miss something, that the missile will release decoys during it mid course, lower the chance of being intercepted.

[@gi02115-h]

yep

[@kjererrrt2381]

it can release decoys, it can evade anti-ballistic defenses, it can carry hypersonic gliding reentry vehicles, it cannot be intercepted by the present anti-ballistic defense.

[@GegeDxD]

It's fascinating how the US didn't learn, but still keep provoking Russia. Whenever they has done a move to threaten Russia, Russia has came out of the situation much stronger. The same will happen now with Ukraine. Ukraine project was created to weaken Russia, but they weakened themselves 🤣

[@GarWhittaker]

Lol yeah Russia looks really strong 😂😂😂😂

[@christera1116]

You sr are a moron. Thousands of russians dies every day in Ukraine.

[@ПетрПетрович777]

@@GarWhittaker Более 50 стран прямо или косвенно воюют против России, а Россия даже 20% своих сил не задействовала Тут важно понимать главное - Россия освобождает своих адекватных людей и исконно русские города на Украине. Поэтому бои ведут вдали от крупны городов, и поэтому русский город Киев не испарился в считанные минуты. Города стран НАТО Россия своими не считает.

[@ПетрПетрович777]

@@GarWhittaker Копируем хронологию и вспоминаем почему проект украина прекращает своё существование *Для тех, кто считает что в Украине НЕТ нацистов и фашистов! ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО К ПРОСМОТРУ* *Артём Гришанов - Игрушки / Toys for Poroshenko / War in Ukraine (English subtitles)* Итог: *4 часа украинских кладбищ*

[@макслюлюкин]

Well, it's like with the Vatican. for a long time they believed that the pope was the first and foremost on earth after God, but the problem is that the Orthodox patriarchs never recognized this, however, as did Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus. In China, by the way, it is called by locals Under heavenly, they believe that China is the center of the world, and everything else is its outskirts.So a similar hubris happened to the United States as to the Vatican

[@gabrielsaraiva1020]

30 minutes is great

[@goeish2586]

Wow. The tech is leaked. I'm gonna make one soon. Thank you for the information. ☺️ 👍

[@fredericksetuagbe4843]

Improper opinion 🤫

[@goeish2586]

@@fredericksetuagbe4843 Prop Props Proper Properly Property 😉

[@Sta2200]

Nothing they revealed is even remotely new..EXCEPT for the MARV re-entry vehicles.. And they are not new..another "magic decade" idea...but only just now being put on multiple warhead missiles. The Pershing -2 had a MARV warhead...in the late 80's..but it was a single RV missile.

[@Hilmend]

​@@Sta2200 blah blah blah😂😂😂

[@РомаБамбуков]

You'll need shovels and washing machines.

[@dmitrihofert6763]

SARMAT on Washington 🚀🚀🚀 🚀

[@javasrevenge7121]

I prefer Davos.

[@lrgege5854]

By the time it reaches Washington there would be no more Russia lol

[@Turloghan]

​@@javasrevenge7121Me too, its better option😉

[@valentinasmolenskaya7260]

@@lrgege5854 Not necessary. Russia is very well protected by Air Defense. Few monthes ago there was a military exercise with intercepting of multiple MIRVs entering Russian test ground. S-400 killed them all.

[@jpfourie1]

I'm so glad that Russia shared their top secrets with you. Now we also know

[@larrychallam4283]

Slava Russia From India ❤

[@lisaayers1975]

Man that missile is SPOOKY .

[@cotal240463]

то что взорвалась на испытаниях. это радует. значит придумали, что то новое к ракете и испытывают. можно вспомнить как ракета с пл чуть не угробила министра обороны англии

[@psevdonim1717]

Думается одна уже у Кима

[@SPENKER52]

Он не для того, чтобы убивать, он для душевного спокойствия.

[@PUTINN365]

From my heart I love russia god bless russia we africa love russia

[@RonaldMcdonald-ow3kh]

I love africans and russians.🇷🇺♥️

[@MrTmenzo]

Hey stop killing gorrilas over there!!!

[@PUTINN365]

@@MrTmenzo stupidy man in the world

[@buzzafrique3700]

Gorilla is food😂

[@YunuguPora-ol3vv]

More concerned for Gorillas than Palestinian lives?

[@AnEmperor-TheKingofTheKings]

🎉Awesome!❤

[@RonaldMcdonald-ow3kh]

Very

[@deanmoxom1330]

Work of art

[@kjererrrt2381]

it's very reassuring that it is so reliable.

[@RonaldGreene-w2y]

Great

[@DaysOfFunder]

2:00 Dude just totally gave us the launch codes.

[@AsifBacha-qw3ho]

This beast can carry UpTo 10ton🥶

[@davidmangru3517]

😂😂😂😂 just make sure you build a under ground bunker because how things is shaping up all hell on earth will let loose😂😂😂😂

[@AsifBacha-qw3ho]

@@davidmangru3517 on what you are talking

[@AsifBacha-qw3ho]

@@davidmangru3517 on what you are talking

[@AsifBacha-qw3ho]

@@davidmangru3517 on what you are talking

[@tinotendazvaipa2480]

you explained everything thoroughly

[@richardjones2811]

Let's all hope these aren't ever used.

[@thecapitalofmind]

They won't, because they don't even fly. Out of five test launch attempts, 4 were unsuccessful, during one of them, the rocket exploded in the mine, leaving behind a 62-meter in diameter crater

[@safifulkin8772]

@@thecapitalofmind Source: Just Trust me bro

[@Ильнур-ы1е]

​@@thecapitalofmindоткуда такая информация бро?

[@eddiewalusimbi2423]

It's not my prayer that they be used, but I am sure that one day, based on many factors, they will be used.

[@lquinn500]

​@@thecapitalofmind c ck

[@horseshoemountainprojects8144]

The Poseidon would be far more devastating !

[@Hamza-iq6gw]

Lol

[@timonsolus]

Poseidon can devastate a port - but not a whole country. Poseidon can create a tsunami - but only a very small one compared to the Tohuku tsunami that hit Japan in 2011.

[@pauldean8638]

@@timonsolus? It makes that tsunami look like a ripple in a pond . Poseidons 100ft wall of water at 500mph which wipes out coasts . 350 times more damage than Hiroshima and makes the land radioactive ( uninhabitable)

[@timonsolus]

@@pauldean8638 : Really? What’s the blast yield on Poseidon’s warhead then? 1,000 megatons? 10,000 megatons?

[@AikasayakaSayaka]

​@@timonsoluslol 10k Megatons poseidon can't never defeat russian 50-100 megatons Tsar Bomba

[@cte4dota]

I Heard they want to use it on Ukraine just with regular warhead instead Nuclear, for testing, there is story for kinetic warheads also since it's very fast and falling from space....

[@ФеликсДзержинский-ф2ш]

Why use them when we have hypersonic missiles "Kinzhal" and missiles "Kalibr" with a range of 5,500 kilometers and the air defense of Ukraine is almost completely paralyzed?:) Don't believe the myths.

[@jozefhorvat3625]

​@@ФеликсДзержинский-ф2ш 👌👌👌👍👍👍💯

[@aleksandrpenerov5303]

Дороговата игрушка для демонстрации на украине. Для этого есть и более простые вещи. У каждого оружия своя специфика применения.

[@rudypieplenbosch6752]

Probably not, you don't want the enemy to get this missile incase it fails.

[@Jvideobox]

Nop, this is for uncle Sam

[@roguecapitalist9875]

The live fire demonstration is gon’be lit as fk

[@sciencespectrum3855]

Salute to the Russian engineers

[@luiscigar4683]

RS-28 SARMAT

[@Yes-Yes1]

Nice concept art guys

[@user54690]

Putin should press that button if necessary

[@Иван_Иванович]

Не волнуйтесь, так и будет. Мир без России нам не нужен)

[@nikitap.2140]

И в правду говорят, Иванушка дурачок​@@Иван_Иванович

[@Иван_Иванович]

@@nikitap.2140 И правду говорят: дурачок тот сви до мит, который к 2024 не смог гидну мову выучить)))

[@DirkDiggler-qp3vm]

@@Иван_Иванович lol sarmat it can’t even leave launchpad 4 of 5 of the total launches have exploded

[@Иван_Иванович]

@@DirkDiggler-qp3vm Lol, now give me some proof from independent and neutral experts who would confirm your lies))) Or did very "truthful SNN" tell you this? ;-)

[@saddamfarhad]

Rs-28 an Russian engineering marvel ❤

[@piotrmontgomerytv7786]

Trident II is faster than this one but it carries less payload 3.6 megaton while Sarmat carries 50 megaton so: Trident II for speed and precision Sarmat II for destruction.

[@_Mordor_812]

Вот интересно- почему Россия должна чувствовать ответственность за такую мощью ракету,которая разносит на атомы пол контингента ? А те страны , которые провоцируют Россия на применение этой ракеты, не должна чувствовать ответственность за последствия?

[@konstantinbesfamilnyh]

Я Искренне надеюсь что они Никогда не будут использованы.Люди Опомнитесь.Правительство США не доводите до греха.

[@Drehbuchautor97]

Respect from Germany 🇩🇪❤🇷🇺.

[@jozefhorvat3625]

Bravooo Russia 👍👍👍💯💯💯

[@castlegate2015]

Amazing..mach 10, mach 30 etc. We still can't design a profitable passenger jet to do Mach 2 after all this design experience 😊

[@ApdalaApadal]

most powerful weapon is the russian military power ❤❤❤

[@gintasvilkelis2544]

Except that it doesn't work.

[@uppityl]

Is this the rocket that exploded at launch?

[@vadimuha]

That's the one

[@techscience6700]

😂😂😂😂

[@SarahFarahmand-o5t]

Fake news from those who can not build missile like Sarmat

[@OFFENDYOU365]

Yep that's the missile the West claimed exploded during launch, but I find it hard to trust Western narratives these days. Let's not forget, every country faces military accidents. Remember how the UK's nuke launching failed a few months ago? And the U.S. has had its share of mishaps too, like when their Minuteman III missile test failed

[@Leo-Orbis]

If I remember correctly, it failed 3/4 attempted launches.

[@SafeAndEffectiveTheySaid]

I remember when they promised us peace at the end of the Cold War, and here we are

[@horseshoemountainprojects8144]

Wait, the warheads are impact detonated? Would there not be a larger blast radius if it was detonated at altitude? Also allowing for a larger EMP affected area?

[@alispeed5095]

You get more irradiated ash when you hit the ground from what l heard. In a doomsday scenario, you want to cause as much long term harm as you can

[@aleksandrpenerov5303]

Ты прав , от взрыва в воздухе область поражения значительно выше и это конечно учитывается.

[@tricky778]

​​@@alispeed5095 don't you want to be able to march on the razed land?

[@wkgurr]

I am sure these warheads can be programmed to detonate at any desired altitude. So whatever the target an appropriate detonation altitude can be selected.

[@EpicLib]

Whoa, that's one fine asteroid destructor!!!

[@LaylaftBecheng]

they so a beautyfull

[@tyapet]

I'm a Russian and my wife is born 80 miles away from Texas. Now we are in Russia and she is able to see many armored vehicles crashed. So she doesn't wish to this cruel war exist

[@tyapet]

Let be conscious, nobody wishes the crash. Such nuclear power is made to speak. But not to speak to between any simple people

[@pratiksalvi98]

Reason for ending of world war 3 😂😂

[@vincenttay2812]

Great move Russia

[@DirkDiggler-qp3vm]

Doesn’t it have to leave the launchpad without exploding to be called a threat.

[@erdnaxeL]

"...into how this powerful weapon actually works. It doesn't. The End."

[@hakhakuuba5073]

This rocket changes its trajectory in its flight. Not by ballistic trajectory but unpredicted trajectory.

[@hanonomiri]

Send one to Newyork please

[@akashkumarmahto4921]

💯

[@souleson]

😅😅😅😂😂😂😂because they know 🇷🇺✍🏿💕

[@philipbrooks7640]

Naming a destructive force that falls from the heavens like a star "Satan II". That's pretty wicked.

[@Ultra_Gaming-we1yt]

Bro castle Bravo and tsar Bomba had the same things inside then why was tsar Bomba more powerful than castle Bravo

[@RonaldMcdonald-ow3kh]

Castle bravo was intended to have a yield of 6 megatons, but turned out to be 15 megatons. Tsar bomba was intended to be 100 megatons, was downsized to 50 megatons and turned out to be 55 megatons.

[@ME-im3ui]

"I know what this is...its a snow cone maker, that's what it is" -arnold

[@Sigmali0ns.49]

Love 💕 Russia from Pakistan 🥳🤗💕🥳🎉❤🇵🇰💕🇨🇵

[@basedbarman]

Russia don't give loans to beggars 😂

[@tallahassZ]

Scary scary times we live in.

[@evinduggins2431]

Well, it has to escape the silo first.

[@hodgsonnn]

considering their IBCMs are far superior technologically that anyone elses tells me you frequent western mainstream media

[@Zerpentsa6598]

Austin thinks it's all bluff. Lammy says, "Show us the beef"! 😂😂😂

[@mrtjbiga1784]

Why can't the united state's name there ICBM's a cool evil name

[@RonaldMcdonald-ow3kh]

Suggestions?

[@AlexandreLefaure]

​@@RonaldMcdonald-ow3kh Yes: Google, Macron, Facebook, Israel, etc

[@horseshoemountainprojects8144]

Trident and Minuteman are decent names! But the B-52H Stratofortress is pretty cool!

[@worldwanderer91]

@@horseshoemountainprojects8144 those names not evil, wicked, scary, dreadful, or chilling enough

[@Stojantarapuza.]

Russian name is sarmat nato name is satan

[@YeshuaAgapao]

The warheads need to be retrofitted to hypersonic glide vehicles or they will just get intercepted.

[@tricky778]

I think they just go mostly straight down like rocks. Can you intercept that?

[@RichardBaran]

How many of these statements have hard evidence?

[@aleksandrpenerov5303]

Думаешь есть смысл на себе проверить ???

[@Ivan-wp1ne1]

Putin warned you back in 2007 in Munich. You didn’t hear. For proofs, turn on TV, world news

[@aleksandrpenerov5303]

Proof of the actual actual presence , combat capability and declared parameters of the weapon can be obtained only after its combat use. Do you need real evidence???

[@SevenDeMagnus]

Cool

[@abumarabumar7489]

Would love to see this over penthouse

[@basedbarman]

*pentagon

[@Igor-zy4vu]

@@basedbarman Все правильно, Penthouse :)

[@JamesDhami-c1m]

Why doesnt any video say about speed of those missiles from taking off to hitting the target.

[@richardjones2811]

It did.

[@horseshoemountainprojects8144]

Turn your speakers on Mate!

[@evinduggins2431]

Like Domino’s Pizza in the 80’s. Thirty minutes or less or the next one is free!

[@JamesDhami-c1m]

@evinduggins2431 🤬

[@Leshiy_52]

The speed according to the documentation is 27000km/h, actually achieved during the test of 33000km/h. You can calculate the flight time to any point of the earth.

[@douglassmith3016]

*Fact:* Nobody has successfully launched an armed ICBM at a target, ever.

[@spiderspider143]

Plz help falastheen🇵🇸❤️

[@Ahmedkayser4195]

The special gift from god to the west🙃🙃🙃

[@progamerz5529]

This misile is actually more powerful than Little boy , Humans are developed very much.

[@shamanbhattacharyya9285]

Little boy 15 kiloton yield. Sarmat yield is several megatons, two different levels

[@petrikbulhar1285]

Záruka sv mieru 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺♥️vivat Rusia,plus Čína,India,Irán,

[@hamed3034]

The world needs peace, not war.

[@TushPetros-dw2zi]

Acually they did 4 tests on Sarmat 2 were succesful hitting target 6000km and 2 failed

[@Инквизиторрасплатапридет]

No

[@watDfacts]

A NUKE WITH ISKANDER LIKE ACCURACY... GGWP... ISKANDER THE MVP OF URKAINE WAR.

[@ayannasir6653]

Is this "SATAN-II" ises liquid fuel or solid fuel?

[@AlexanderSchreiber]

Liquid fueled. It's basically a Russian rip-off of the R-36 which was designed by ... an Ukrainian company.

[@ВЛАДИМИР0809]

@@AlexanderSchreiber разрабатывалось всё русскими на Украине и не более.как только вы отвалились все технологии забрали и поэтому вы за 30 лет ничего сами не можете создать своего!

[@ayannasir6653]

@AlexanderSchreiber So which category is better LIQUID FUEL rockets or SOLID FUEL rockets?

[@ВЛАДИМИР0809]

@@ayannasir6653 Жидкостные обеспечивают большую скорость истечения газов и соответственно бОльшие забрасываемый вес или дальность, но гораздо сложнее, дороже и капризнее, ракета больше по длине, большее время подготовки к пуску и трудность его отмены (фактически после отмены начавшейся предпусковой подготовки ракета не боеспособна). .Твердотопливные проще хранить в боеготовом состоянии, они требуют меньше времени на подготовку. Но у них нет возможности управления тягой двигателя - двигатель включается сразу на полную мощность и работает до полной выработки топлива.

[@AlexanderSchreiber]

@@ayannasir6653 Solid fuel is a lot simpler (_but_ you have to be able to correctly cast the large fuel blocks without _any_ bubbles or fissures, which is an art in itself), can be stored for a long time and is almost immediately ready. Once ignited, burns to completion at full power (no throttle control) - which for an ICBM is generally not an issue. Liquid fuel gives you more performance (== heavier throw weight), but is massively more complex, lots of moving parts (e.g. pumps) and plumbing. Cryogenic fuels are a non-starter (imaging expecting your enemy to give you a few hours warning before nuking you so you can fuel your ICBM ... right), so the standard storable liquid propellant is UDMH (Hydrazine) for fuel and N2O4 as oxidizer - fuel your missile and store it ready to launch for _some_ time. That fuel mix is hypergolic (ignites on contact), which is nice for reliability. Both components are very, very nasty to unprotected humans (as in: tries very hard to kill you and gives you cancer if you happen to survive). Also, small mistakes/faults resulting in fuel leaks are very likely to result in the missile exploding ... US tends to go for small, precisely applied munitions, Russia for maximum boom in the general direction of the target, hence different priorities.

[@ΥπερδιαγαλαξιακόςΑστροπολεμιστ]

This size can reduce gasoline and replacing it with more nuke warheads,while degreasing its longevity in terms of distance.It is huge and this is why it lets it travel everywhere in the world.

[@soladsani]

after the military pact between Russia and Iran, .. imagine if Iran 🚀has it❗️❗️❗️

[@CBeard849]

You guys forgot the step where it gets halfway out of it's underground silo and explodes into a million pieces!

[@imdumped]

most dangerous icbm that explode on its launchpad, so scared

[@tomnguyen9931]

How many truck does it take to jump start that missile?

[@oathsvision3227]

Idiot it made a crater wnd and didnt explode, get your facts checked, sucker of US

[@dulanethdilhara9323]

There is no wonder why aliens dont visit us Once , humans managed to destroy entire alien spaceship just by bit accelerated manhole cover & They know they stand no chance with these kind of intergalactic ballistics

[@YlmazDALKIRANscallion]

9th!

[@RonaldMcdonald-ow3kh]

Congratulations, 9 is a very lucky number! 🥳