American Reacts The Territorial Evolution Of HUNGARY

[@Anduci78]

Croatia was in a personal union with Hungary so technically not conquared. The treaty of Trianon was quite messy. Hungary did not want to attack Serbia which lead to WWI but had no say in it. The Hungarian delegate was not even received when the treaty was decided effectively excluding them from the negotiation. So Hungary got the punishment for something they did not want and did not start. Many territory bigger cities were annexed not because of the nationality of the population but because of their strategic location. Eg. big railway junctions like Arad or Bratislava (then called Pozsony) etc.

[@Optimistic7718]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3qymGinqrBpkNEsi=JR1cRlwQ6O5VZQ2D

[@Nellopton]

No, it was conquered; the personal union was forced by Hungarian kings during the 11th century.

[@DeusVult-q3f]

It was conquered and blackmailed to sign capitulation, 13 croatian nobels were pretty much held at gunpoint (swordpoint).

[@kabirbody]

​@@NelloptonHungary protected Croatia against the Italian conquer.

[@dcsibrak741]

We are in a good relationship with Croatia till today.

[@Budai976]

To be fair, the border was not drawn in the Treaty of Trianon on the basis of population figures. Some areas was deliberately annexed to weaken Hungary economically and to allow the new states to benefit. In many places, the border was drawn so that the railways would not run through Hungarian territory. The best example of this is Sátoraljaújhely, where the north-eastern part of the town was cut off to make the railway and station part of Slovakia. The peace treaty striked Hungary the hardest, even though we did not start the war and could do the least about it.

[@Optimistic7718]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3qymGinqrBpkNEsi=JR1cRlwQ6O5VZQ2D

[@zoltancsilics7810]

Üdv. Az én családom felmenői anyai ágon, Nagymácsédon laktak, az is csak magyarok által lakott település volt. Még ma is élnek ott rokonok, mert a családot erőszakkal szétszakították, a nagyszülőket marha vagonokba rakták és Hartára telepítették őket. A határok meghúzása meg sem közelítette a népesség eloszlását.

[@Budai976]

@@zoltancsilics7810 A partiumban úgy lett meghúzva a határvonal, hogy a Temesvár-Arad-Nagyvárad-Szatmárnémeti vasútvonal a románok kezére kerüljön, pedig végig bőszen magyar többség volt. Csak a románoknak kellett egy észak-dél vasúti vonal a térségben. Szlovákia meg a kelet-nyugat irányú Tiszacsernyő-Kassa-Rozsnyó vonalat, kapta így és hát Sátoraljaújhely is ezen a vonalon van. A legrosszabbul egyébént azok jártak, akiket a 2. VH után még jobban elvágtak. Pl. Nagyszelmenc-Kisszelmenc, egyik Szlovákiához tartozott, másik a Szovjetunióhoz és határ nem volt közte, aki megpróbált átszökve a rokonokkal találkozni azt lelőtték. Vagy mehetett több tíz km-es kerülőúton aztán vagy átjutott, vagy nem.

[@bognarattila5115]

So, if I settle my own nation on the territory of the neighboring countries and give my said neighbors a bad name for a long time in front of the politicians of the great powers, can I take the territory of any neighboring country??? Hmm that's brilliant! Then maybe that's why illegal migrants, who are mostly men, come to Europe???? Wow, what an idea!!! - Remélem sokan látják majd amit írtam neked..

[@bognarattila5115]

@@zoltancsilics7810 Minden tiszteletem azoké az üldözött magyaroké, akik nem adták fel az identitásukat a borzalmas helyzetük ellenére sem! 😐👍

[@monikadrnovscek8282]

About Trianon: cutting off territories with majority of other nations is BULLSHIT. I am from a city which is now part of Serbia (former Yugoslavia) and 100 years ago there was a Hungarian majority of 90%. My grand-grand mother never learned Serbian and my grandmother barely spoke it. Trianon was ment to destroy a great and powerful nation out of fear. Nothing else.

[@maozedong8370]

Well that was part of the reason. The other part is they were on the losers side of the war and when you lose a war, you don't get to make demands, demands are made of you instead. Everyone knows that. Also, throughout all of history usually when a war is lost or territory taken the people living in said areas have usually three options. The first being stay, but you belong to this new nation now so ideally start learning the language and enjoy your stay. Two, take your family and anyone else unhappy with the situation and relocate to the country you consider home (unless it got completely absorbed that is). Or three, if your new rulers decide they don't even want you breathing the air in their new territory, they could ethnically cleanse the area though in the modern age, that may not go down all that well though it is effective, especially for the stubborn ones who may bring social or political instability to your new territorial gains.

[@serafimbarbu7711]

Ok man, I get you. And you’re most definitely right about that part but hear me out. There were lots of communities in regions like Transylvania for example (way over 70%) which weren’t hungarian. Magyars were living in a territory where people from other ethnicities outnumbered them 3 to 1. The changes made at Trianon were certainly justified in those cases.

[@meleardil]

It is a sad joke among hungarians: Hungary is the only country in the world which borders only itself.

[@meleardil]

@@serafimbarbu7711 According to the "redraw borders based on ethnics" logic the most just borders were the ones during WW2. When those territories which were majority hungarians were given back, and the rest remained with other countries. Also, according to that, the russians are absolutely justified taking those parts of Ukraine which are majority russian. Would you agree? Hmmm? Or if some one says "the territorial integrity of Ukraine" than what about the 1000 years territorial integrity of Hungary?

[@Syrenia1552]

@@serafimbarbu7711 The Romanians were in a strong majority only in southern Transylvania. But only because during the War of Independence of 1848/49, the Romanian Free Forces exterminated the Hungarian population. They burnt settlements and destroyed irreplaceable treasures (the library of the Reformed College). The ethnic map of Southern Transylvania was changed forever. Was this genocide to be rewarded?

[@37-esvasutvonal]

Croatia was practically independent. It had its own parliament, administration, laws and budget. The king was common (personalunio), who was the king of Hungary.

[@DeusVult-q3f]

That is semi-false. Those laws and members of parliament and laws and budged was still ruled by Habsburgs.

[@katalinkozak9869]

My hometown in todays Romania, is one of the oldest cities of Hungary established by the Saint King Ladislaus ( sir Lancelots model figure) in XII called Varad ( Oradea today). In 1920 the city had a full majority of Hungarian speaking population over 90% and served as one of the major cultural center in Hungary when it has been attached to Romania. Hungarian was immediately prohibited, schools turned to Romanian, all cultural centers as the theatre closed. Many people , among them my great grandparents who owned shops and houses in the city center had their homes confiscated, pushed to the outskirts of the city that later became the ghetto. In 1945-46 the shops were taken too by the communists, my great uncle was forced with a Kalashnikov on his had to work as butcher 12-14 hours a day, without a slice of meat provided for his family, same applied to my grand ma in her bakery. If caught to take a loaf of bread meant prison, so did my aunt end up in prison, you stole from the Romanian nation. We lost even what we had prior the house in the ghetto to take her out. In the late 60’s, the forced urbanisation began that enabled the max influx of non hungarian population by demolishing whole neighbourhoods predominantly Hungarian to soviet style block of flats districts. Many historic buildings and a cemetery of 300 years have been destroyed completely. This time we were lucky as our family home was saved just by luck in 89, the demolishment was planned to 90. During a timeframe of 20 years, a population of over 100k Of non Transylvanian romanians have been moved systematically to the city. Unwillingly the city that was one of the intellectual hotspot had its culture ruined by people who had nothing to do with our culture or norms we lived in Transylvania for centuries regardless all ethnicities. From the 70% our population shrank to 30% by 1990, and to a bit over 20% today. We do not hold of grudge on the people moving in , they are innocent on the matter, but it is clear our cultural heritage, history and human rights were raped and destroyed systematically! And this happened to all major cities of the Transylvania and Banat. Today, we try to cooperate as much as we can to save what has left from tge built heritage, but our history is cancelled, and our culture and existence is still unwanted. There is an ongoing effort to not even mention our existence in the city and region despite having 100s of influencers paid to visit for advertising and the international media cooperates. This is why Trianon cuts so deep to every Hungarian. The truth needs to be told and accepted, so that we can make a brighter future! Greetings from beautiful Nagyvárad/ Oradea/ Grosswardein!

[@Mazsola-x2f]

Hegyközcsatári-ként pontosan ezt a komentet kerestem. Köszönöm hogy valaki ezt is leírta.

[@62rob53]

Ez szép írás volt! Illetve csúnya.

[@katalinkozak9869]

@nincs mit ;-) Nem reg egy Euronews biharrol szóló sorozat kiverte nálam a biztositekot. Volt szó benne a szlovák faluról ahol mindenki magyar akcentussal beszelt, motokrol, a linasult meg tradicionális erdelyi étel volt. Magyar az nem volt benne, mert az ég megnyílik ha kiderül itt vagyunk ;-) . Udvozlet Pestről kedves Mazsola! Egy örök Varad-Csillagvarosi ;-)!

[@ClifffSVK]

It's interesting to see the effects of the propagandistic Hungarian education system in the comment section under every video about Hungarian history. But what about the other side of the coin? When Magyars came to Pannonia, there were peoples already living there. Have you ever thought about it? Magyars took control of bigger settlements, built the infrastructure and for centuries oppressed local serfs and peasants. Magyars lived in cities, but all the countryside around them was inhabited by descendants of pre-Magyar populations. When the wave of national revival movements came and tried to give these peasants some rights, education and their own official, codified language, the Hungarian rule did everything to supress it. You never talk about these people, you just cry over Magyar landowners losing their influence over the subjugated territories. These other ethnic groups had to live in the Magyar shadow for over 900 years and the nerve of these kids in comment sections to say things like these other peoples don't have a history... I don't know what you were taught, you can think of Trianon what ever you want, but justice has been served.

[@verestamas3920]

@@ClifffSVK So 1000 years of culture and state are nothing in your eyes. Have you ever wondered if that great oppression had been true, then there would be no Slovakia or Romanians? They would have been assimilated or exterminated. Try reading a non-Romanian fantasy book. All historians laugh at Romanian history education.

[@christianlepabic7346]

Long live Hungary, proud and free country !

[@Optimistic7718]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3qymGinqrBpkNEsi=JR1cRlwQ6O5VZQ2D

[@aphextwin5712]

Long live democracy, freedom of speech, the rule of law, protection of minorities.

[@christianlepabic7346]

@@aphextwin5712Good ! You have perfectly listed what Hungary now stands for : resistance against woke totalitarism, because THEY remember what totalitarism is

[@christianlepabic7346]

@@Optimistic7718 Excellent video. Thanks !

[@bubee8123]

14:10 Croatia had much of the Hungarian territory way back in 900s with good chunk of Bosnian land. Ottomans took most of it, we joined Hungary so we can defeat them together. When Ottomans stopped being a threat Croatia wanted it territory back. We could not get Bosnian part but since Hungarian land was up for grabs after ww1 Yugoslavia took it and integrated it into Croatia and Serbia. That is why Croatia has weird shape. Trust me I am Croatian with Hungarian family name that goes way back and my love and pride for those two nations cannot be measured. Google Kingdom of Croatia (925-1102) to see what I am talking about.

[@freebozkurt9277]

It is simple rubbish you wrote. You joined us Hungarians because the VENETIANS were taking your original homeland (eg. Zara /Zadar) and only the Hungarians were strong enough to stop the. Check how many times fought Hungary for the freedom of Zadar against the Venetians. The Ottomans came centuries later. Also Croatia never hold territories in the North. It was Avar Kaganate who brought in the Slavs (your ancestors) then it was servaryl German tribes, like the Ostrogoths, finally Eastern Francia (Frank Empire) before us Hungarians arrived. There was no Croatia whatsoever.

[@CocoSon-we2rg]

@@freebozkurt9277 You have no arguments, however you twist it, that they came about 300 years before you, even if you don't take into account and the Dalmatian root.

[@bubee8123]

@@freebozkurt9277 Google Kingdom of Croatia (925-1102) Venetians were also a threat but we joined Hungary because of Ottomans.

[@andraslaszlo9206]

@@bubee8123 absolutely false! Croatian joined Hungarian Kingdom in XIIth century, Ottomans set their feet on Balkans in the 2nd half of XIVth. Anjou Louis the Great fought first time against the Ottomans in 1366, and that date was 250 years later then Croatia joined Hungarian Kingdom! Telling the truth, Croatia was between the Venezian and Byzantine Empire. Hungary fought many times for the sores... After the personal union, the Croatian bán (well, probably the duke is a similar title in English) was the 3rd highest rank in Hungarian noble society, the Croatians could keep their own justice, nobility, ranks and taxes. It was not an occupation, there was no colonazitions. Nicola Zrinski, the bán of Croatia tried to rebuild the Hungarian Kingdom in the middle of 17th. He started a revolution against Habsburg rules, agreed with Louis the 14th, but he tragically died in a hunting accident in 1664. The accident is questionable until today. The last tries were cut in 1669, when the Habsburgs arrested and executed Peter Zrinski, Ferenc Frangepan with many Hungarian nobles and put an end to the Sub Rosa revolution. After that, the 2 nations started to walk on different passes, cos the Habsburgs tried everything to separate them. Split and rule politics. But until that, the 2 nations were pretty close to each others.

[@bubee8123]

@@andraslaszlo9206 I agree with everything u said. But lets not say our union lasted 816 years and Ottomans didn't play any part in that. To be perfectly clear Croatia had succession crisis 1012 so king Kálmán(Koloman,cro) was crowned as ruler of Croatia and Dalmatia. We had many enemies over the years. Bulgars, Byzantine Empire, Franks, Venetians, Habsburgs, Holy Roman empire and many others. But Ottomans and Mongols were the two biggest threats that our union had to face. It made us what we are to this day, allies and friends. Not some crowning of the king nobody cared about, but blood we spilled together protecting our land and families from invaders. Antemurale Christianitatis (Bastions of Christianity).

[@williambranch4283]

Poland and Hungary gave up the ghost to defeat the Mongol Horde, but lost. Later the Mongols got hungry for more Hungary but were defeated.

[@AdamGeorgeSanders]

Mongols were defeated in 1286. Learn: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Mongol_invasion_of_Hungary

[@Optimistic7718]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3qymGinqrBpkNEsi=JR1cRlwQ6O5VZQ2D

[@dcsibrak741]

Atleast we fought and died together with our brothers.

[@dealundquist4236]

My family is from Transsylvania. All of them are Hungarians. Non of my grandparents vere related to Romanians. My grandparents were born as Hungarian citizens. Than they became Romanian citizens. Than Hungarian citizens. Than Romanian citizens. Hungary was in war with the mongols, waste population was exctint by them. Than 400 years war because of muslim invasion. It was an other extinction of wast population. The Hungarians know ehy they do not accept muslim immigrants. When I was a child we still were playing ”the turks are coming”, as other children played seek and hide.

[@vnevemknevem529]

We, hungarians build this country since its born, and gave our blood in fights and wars for our homeland. Therefore number of hungarian population decreased during the centuries. After the turkish occupation thousands of foreigners arrived and settled into the Carpathian-basin, we accepted them, so the population became mixed among the borders. After the 1st world war, our neighbours attacked us and detached 2/3 of our territory, with help of Antant powers. Hungary became a small and weak country, but we don't forget our greatness and we hope, our country and nation once will be great, strong and united again.

[@Ταργιτάος1]

You are right about everything, the researchers even found out, and today genetic research has also confirmed this, that the real Hungarian-speaking people never wanted to subjugate and conquer others, they only always protected their ancestral lands, and here I am not writing about the desires of some Hungarian kings! That is why the Hungarian people defended Europe the most, but rather Western Christianity, because it was the Hungarians who protected the eastern borders of Western civilization from the Pechenegs, Uzians, Cumans, Mongols, Tatars, Turks, Cossacks and even other invaders! But the Westerners either forgot about this great sacrifice, or they didn't even know much about it by the 19th century, because they let the Hungarians down in 1848, just as they did one hundred and thirty years before during the Rákóczi War of Independence. And mainly because by that time the Hungarians were already so weakened and diminished in the Carpathian basin that they fell under the yoke of the Habsburgs, who had always worked against the Hungarians, until 1867 at the latest. Because there is already a lot of information about how the Habsburgs incited the nationalities against the Hungarians, especially after the Bocskai, Bethlen, Thököly and Rákóczi freedom wars, they helped with all means the settlement of the Vlachs, Serbs and other nationalities in the territory of the Hungarian kingdom, who then they incited against the Hungarians! And that's how we got there, that in Transylvania and the south-eastern parts of the kingdom, Romanians were already in the majority in most counties by 1780, and in Bánság, Serbs were also in the majority, and you have accurate data about them, but these peoples deny them! And then from the 1890s you can read that the Romanians started claim territories in Transylvania, Máramaros and in the Partium. And this is how it became the situation even before Trianon, that the representatives of the nationalities in Hungary and the intellectuals and politicians of the neighboring states lied to Europe by saying that the Hungarians oppress and have always oppressed the nationalities. In doing so, they deceived the West to such an extent that the great figures of international culture, such as the writer of the Norwegian national anthem Bjørnstjerne Bjørnson, or the Scottish journalist Robert Seton-Watson completely fell for them and helped them to tune the entire Western public opinion against the Hungarians. Lev Tolstoy was also wanted to be ensnared by his Slovak doctor, but he resisted. Unfortunately, however, the propaganda was a complete success in the West, and during the peace negotiations in 1919, one of the biggest arguments for the dismemberment of Hungary was this very false accusation made by the Romanians, Czechs, and Slovaks. I'm writing this only because I live here in Transylvania and I've experienced up close for more than fifty years that this mainly anti-Hungarian propaganda history has been taught to the Romanians all along and to this day! The essence of this is that they are the descendants of the ancient Geto-Dacians who were Romanized, they experienced many invasions here, because such barbaric peoples as the Huns, Avars and Magyars came and went, but the problem is that the Magyars or Hungarians stayed and robbed them and they took their ancestral lands! This is why Romanians, even those whose ancestors never lived in Transylvania, are so proud, because they have been taught this for more than a hundred years, that the barbaric Magyars only stole their ancestral lands and kept them in slavery until the end of the First World War, when they deservedly Romanians got their ancient land back! This is how we got to the point where the number of Hungarians in Transylvania and Parthium is barely one million, because some of them emigrated to Hungary, and many of those who stayed at home have already assimilated, because young people often give up their nationality for a better living. But most of all, I think this is because here in Romania, officially, we are still the invading robbers, and the Hungarian politicians and historians are also to blame for this!

[@ClifffSVK]

Average victim of the Hungarian education system

[@delmaticodsh5281]

I like hungary Thanks to reaction

[@Unwoken_European]

I would have prefered not being under them for so long as a slav.

[@delmaticodsh5281]

@Unwoken_European agree

[@Budai976]

@@Unwoken_European I bet you haven't lived even a minute under us. 😄Anyway, in those days it was not nationality that mattered, but who was whose vassal or dominus.

[@Optimistic7718]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3qymGinqrBpkNEsi=JR1cRlwQ6O5VZQ2D

[@Dantepokla]

Justice for Hungary!!!

[@theuralictribes5689]

Realistically when you think about it, neither Trianon nor even WW1 would've ever happened if Hungary won its fight for independence in 1848-1849 without the Russian involvement. Because then Austria would've been defeated by the Hungarians who were at the gates of Vienna who would've not had much influence on the Balkan regions afterwards. The Balkans would've been left to do their own thing in an alternative ending. Plus with Hungary being nationalistic it sure as hell would not have wanted to get involved in the Balkan matters. This is why there is such a great resentment in some people towards outsiders especially when they are trying to get involved in their personal national matters.

[@Ταργιτάος1]

The trouble started already in 1241 - 1242, when almost a third of the Hungarian population perished with the Mongol-Tatar invasion, and this is what Hungarian historians and archaeologists say based on the latest research! Because it has also been revealed in recent decades that before that Hungarian speakers were more than 80% in the entire Kingdom, and this is also clearly visible based on the old place names and geographical names! And this is precisely what the Romanians and our Slavic neighbors are lying about, because if the truth is revealed that they were not here much in the 12th century, then their whole theory of continuity will disappear, and with that an entire people's soul will collapse! It also turned out that since the Hungarians were a true self-sacrificing warrior people, they resisted the Mongols in all the cities and villages, even the women and the old people fought, and it can be seen from the large number of archaeological finds in the Hungarian lowlands that the population there was almost completely wiped out! Since then, it has also been revealed that the Mongols left the country thanks to this great opposition, because they found data in the Mongolian and Chinese archives that the Mongols had such great losses that they had a separate cemetery for their fallen soldiers in Hungary next to their capital, because they they took their heads home with them! That's when the Slavs and Vlachs began to infiltrate the vacated Hungarian-inhabited areas, where most of the Hungarians had died, and since then their three-century war with the Ottomans and the wars with the Habsburgs have always only destroyed the Hungarians and benefited these peoples!

[@woptiomko]

@@Ταργιτάος1 Basically every country in the world (except Hungary) is lying about the history. If you want to be taken seriously, do your research, educate yourself and put your nationalism somewhere for a while.

[@Ταργιτάος1]

@@woptiomkoI have been researching these data for more than thirty years, so I don't expect a brainwashed Slovak to understand the historical truth, when your historians stole most of the history from the Hungarians, even your coat of arms on your flag is a copy of the ancient Hungarian coat of arms, and anyone can see this in the wide world!

[@podlumpy3838]

14:11 the strange shape of croatia is because of the turks, what they conquered then from the kingdom of croatia, is now bosnia. croatia was not really a part of hungary, not conquered, it was an union

[@Optimistic7718]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3qymGinqrBpkNEsi=JR1cRlwQ6O5VZQ2D

[@bubee8123]

He needs to google ''Kingdom of Croatia (925-1102)'' to understand where it all started.

[@sziszi050]

@@Optimistic7718 Beleszerettél a ctr C és Ctr V-be? Arra ki kíváncsi? Tudom, hogy bárki szerkesztheti, de miből indulnak ki a meglevő, megtalálható dokumentumokból. Mely dokumentumokat a győztesek szerkesztik a saját gazdasági politikai érdekükből. Azért kellene meghallgatni azokat is akiket nem engedtek a tárgyalóasztalhoz.

[@furesz89]

Matthias wanted to be the the holy roman emperor, uses its resources to push the ottomans back,

[@alexandrutomescu4146]

Matthias stole the money sent to Stefan of Moldavia for the fight against the Turks(sent by the pope).And you're surprised that he had a rich library and the air of an emperor.

[@forgottenmusic1]

The successor states didn't get just their national borders, but far more, including dominantly Hungarian areas, if it was in their strategic and economic interests. And, back then, Slovaks weren't even thinking about Czechoslovakia, they had roughly equal divide between those who were looking for full independence, and those who looked for autonomy in federal Hungary. Germany and Austria lost far less, in a lot of cases the new borders were determined by referendums, and especially Germany succeeded even to keep several areas with mixed population. An issue what has got relatively little attention - if Hungary (and Slovakia) didn't get Communist governments, perhaps the partition could become less fatal.

[@raistarlingthemage1661]

While the Vienna Awards were not perfect by any means, they did mostly restore ethnic Hungarian land. Only exception is Carpathian Ruthenia, and the corridor between Hungary and Székelyföld. With a population transfer it probably would have balanced out. Too bad it was given by Germany, who as we all know, just wanted as many bodies to throw into the meatgrinder of war, as possible.

[@meleardil]

According to the "redraw borders based on ethnics" logic the most just borders were the ones during WW2. When those territories which were majority hungarians were given back, and the rest remained with other countries. Also, according to that, the russians are absolutely justified taking those parts of Ukraine which are majority russian. Would you agree? Hmmm? Or if some one says "the territorial integrity of Ukraine" than what about the 1000 years territorial integrity of Hungary?

[@CocoSon-we2rg]

@@raistarlingthemage1661 Székelyföld autonomy would be like a plug in the ass for Romania. How is Gagauzia for the Republic of Moldova with all the russians miseries against it.

[@Optimistic7718]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3qymGinqrBpkNEsi=JR1cRlwQ6O5VZQ2D

[@aphextwin5712]

@@meleardilThe point is to break the cycle of war. And to say that from this point onwards, anybody who attempts to change borders by military means will be severely punished. And to avoid rewarding such behaviour by acquiescence to territorial changes.

[@jezus6792]

The problem that caused the Ottoman Empire to destroy Hungary was the fact that we got a Habsburg ruler that no one wanted (he had no legal rule and no proper coronation), so no one accepted him as king because they didn't send soldiers either , or even if they were sent, they often avoided the battles. The Habsburg army, even though it was ridiculous compared to its age, was not compared to the veteran, well-equipped army of the Black Army, and the border defense minority mounted archery troops who paid their taxes in battle.

[@hunguy3280]

The purpose of my note is to inform Messrs. Connor and or McJibbin, both of whom I presume are American Nationals, that Hungary is not a new State when compared to the USA. The Kingdom of Hungary is Historically a 1,000 year old Kingdom. The question here is who is responsible for the Truncation of this Kingdom, which resulted in the loss of 75% of the Kingdom's territory, together with the loss of 65% of its population under the brutally unfair treaty of Trianon, after WW1? My answer to you is that in the main the responsibility lies with the US and UK government representatives. The action by your President Wilson under this treaty, was so severe, after he spent almost 8 months in Paris, that the Senate of the Unites States refused to ratify the said Treaty, however, there were no territorial alteration of the Treaty. This evolution of the Territory of Hungary after WW1, to this day is under question, requiring further re - examination.

[@aphextwin5712]

Do you hear Germans complaining about the “loss” of Alsace to France? Or the “loss” of Eupen-Malmedy to Belgium? Or the “loss” of East Prussia, Pomerania and Silesia to Russia and Poland? No, you don’t.

[@theuralictribes5689]

@@aphextwin5712 I would love to see if that were the case or if you would have the same attitude if today your country or their country lost 70% of their current modern day territory for no reason and were told to get over it on the next day and if you dare to complain about it you would be labelled as one of the worst villains ever. I'm a Hungarian born in Slovakia and I was bullied in school for my ethnicity so much I had to move somewhere else. Try to walk in another persons shoes and THEN lecture others about territory loss which leads to risks of ethnic discrimination.

[@gabortoth3706]

@@aphextwin5712 a united Germany only exists from 1871, so the whole situation is very different and yes, I hear them complain.

[@aphextwin5712]

@ But the Holy Roman Empire goes back 1000+ years. And with it German-speaking populations, of course to varying degrees, depending on which area you look at. And I criticise them for complaining any time they do so as well. I am a descendant of people born in areas that no longer are part of Germany. But I have zero interest in those areas becoming part of Germany again. That kind of thinking is what has lead to many wars and resentments against neighbours that don’t help anybody.

[@gabortoth3706]

@@aphextwin5712 The Holy Empire wasn´t a united state, it´s member states fought wars against each other from time to time and it doesn´t change the fact, that territorial integrity doesn´t play as big as a role in german identity as in hungarian. I´m german from my mother´s side and I live here from 1984 on, I studied history at the university of Essen, so I know the geremans and their thoughts. They were forced not to discuss these matters by the allies after WW2. And where did you see someone saying the hungarian territories should be given back? But we want our minorities in the neighbopring countries to at least get granted the rights that were guaranteed in the Treaty of Trianon. And we demand to stop the history falsification in those countries!

[@meleardil]

According to the "redraw borders based on ethnics" logic the most just borders were the ones during WW2. When those territories which were majority hungarians were given back, and the rest remained with other countries. Also, according to that, the russians are absolutely justified taking those parts of Ukraine which are majority russian. Would you agree? Hmmm? Or if some one says "the territorial integrity of Ukraine" than what about the 1000 years territorial integrity of Hungary?

[@tamaspekker3729]

Egyetértek.Amugy a területek homogenitàsa a törôk hodoltsàg idején kezdödôtt mikor óriàsi terűletek néptelenedtek el az àllandó hàború elfogyasztotta a magyarsàgot amit késöbb a magukat a török k8űzése utän itt " felejtett " Habsburg uralkodók nemzetiségekkel potóltak

[@Optimistic7718]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3qymGinqrBpkNEsi=JR1cRlwQ6O5VZQ2D

[@sziszi050]

@@tamaspekker3729 Na meg szerbekkel, vallonokkal, az itt maradt törökökkel, akik keresztények és magyarul beszélő magyarok lettek. A jövő megmutatja majd, hogy mennyire lesznek németek a behívott és befogadott migránsokból.(?)

[@Syrenia1552]

@@sziszi050 Soha. Az iszlám nem hasonul más kultúrákhoz. Ráadásul nekik nem a beilleszkedés, hanem a hódítás a céljuk.

[@aronlukacs6911]

Very contentful reaction, thanks! Cheers from Hungary :)

[@szalard]

In 1920 in the treaty of Trianon 2/3's of the territories of the Hungarian kingdom were given to Romania, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and even Austria, which was guilty of dragging Hungary to war, because Hungary could not decide to remain outside, do to the fact that it was part of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy, in which the foreign and war affairs were conducted exclussively by Vienna. Although not being a free country, with its own will in the foreign and war affairs, Hungary was treated as one, and punished accordingly. And what is the most astonishing that Austria received Western Hungary. Still in those places remained regions with Hungarian majority populations (Szeklerland, Kalotaszeg, Partium, Southern Slovakia, Western Transkarpathia, Northern Voyvodina). This is a list of cities in the neighboring countries that still have absolute Hungarian majority (more than 50 % of the inhabitants) populations: In Slovakia: Komárom (Komárno), Dunaszerdahely (Dunajská Streda), Fülek (Filekovo), Gúta (Guta), Somorja (Šamorín), Királyhelmec (Kráľovský Chlmec), Párkány (Štúrovo), Nagymegyer (Veľký Meder), Nagykapos (Veľké Kapušany), Tornalja (Tornaľa), Ipolyság (Šahy), Bős (Gabčíkovo), Naszvad (Nesvady), Tiszacsernyő (Čierna nad Tisou). In Romania: Székelyudvarhely (Odorheiu Secuiesc), Kézdivásárhely (Târgu Secuiesc), Sepsiszentgyörgy (Sfântu Gheorghe), Csíkszereda (Miercurea Ciuc), Nagykároly (Carei), Nagyszalonta (Salonta), Kovászna (Covasna), Tusnádfürdő (Băile Tușnad), Szováta (Sovata), Gyergyószentmiklós (Gheorgheni), Székelykeresztúr (Cristuru Secuiesc), Barót (Baraolt), Borszék (Borsec), Szentegyháza (Vlăhița), Érmihályfalva (Valea lui Mihai), Erdőszentgyörgy (Sângeorgiu de Pădure), Sárköz (Șarchiuz), Nyárádszereda (Miercurea Nirajului), Székelyhíd (Săcueni). In Serbia: Zenta (Senta), Topolya (Bačka Topola), Magyarkanizsa (Kanjiža), Ada (Ada). So even after more than 100 years of foreign rule, and their continuous efforts to assimilate the Hungarians, there are many Hungarian towns in the post-Trianonic states. Although, in 1914, the Hungarian prime minister István Tisza tried to prevent the starting of the war (he said: "With this war, we cannot win anything, but we can lose everything"), because of Hungary was not fully independent (it had no control over the war and foreign policy, controlled totally by Vienna), could not do anything, but after the war ended, even Austria took away Hungarian lands... This was the final disgrace of the, already disastrous Versailles "peace" treaty system. So, Hungary, as the only part of the empire that did not want the war, in the end, was punished like the most guilty of all losing countries (which Hungary was not a part of, because it was not an independent country), and lost even territories for its old master who was the starter of the war! Only with a revolt, additional fights, deaths of people, and a referendum, could Hungary take back 10 % of the territory given to Austria, with a dictate, by the victors. The victors claimed that they partage Hungary among its neighbors because Hungary oppressed harshly the Romanians, Serbs, Slovaks, etc, and tried to Magyarize them, forbidding them to learn and speak their languages. But, if we compare the language, cultural, and political rights of the nationalities of Hungary with the policies of France or even England towards their own nationalities (Britons, Welsh, Scots, Irish), we will see, that Hungary gave the greatest rights to its nationalities from all the European countries. This all story of the oppression of the "Asiatic" (a racist stigmata) Hungarians, was spread by the Czech and Romanian propagandists sent to the West to influence public opinion, and also by people like R-W Seton-Watson (a Scotsman who did not speak the language of his Gaelic ancestors, like 90 % of his kinsmen, speaking only English, while, according to the Hungarian census of 1910, 87 % of the Romanians in Transylvania did not spoke any Hungarian - this is how they were “Magyarized”...), who spread in West these things which were mainly the echoes of the anti-Hungarian propaganda made by their Czech, Serbian or Romanian friends. Let me bring some proof of the fact that, compared with the other European states (including France, England, and the USA), in reality, Hungary was a paradise for the national, cultural, and linguistic rights of the nationalities. I have to say from the beginning that I know better the situation of the Romanians from Transylvania, and this is why I speak mainly about their rights, but I know that the others did have the same rights. In Transylvania, more Romanian schools existed than in Romania itself. In these schools, Hungarian wasn’t taught at all. Everything was taught only in Romanian. From 1910 they started to teach Hungarian language in these schools, but only as a foreign language. The other subjects continued to be taught in Romanian. But before that time the Romanian children didn’t learn the language of the state. Romanians had dozens of Romanian newspapers (for example Gazeta de Transilvania, Amicul familiei, Transilvania, Biserica si Scoala, Telegraful Roman, Romanul, Tribuna Poporului, Albina, Libertatea, etc.), magazines, cultural organizations, theater companies, which were exclusive in Romanian. They had even a Romanian national bank called “Albina”. They had also a Romanian national party in the Hungarian parliament. The first Romanology research institute and university branch was founded in Budapest, 20 years before being founded in Romania. I compare the huge rights of the Romanians in Transylvania and the cruel oppression of the Hungarian Csángó’s from Romania, who had no schools, no newspapers, no magazines, no theatres, no banks, no parties in their language, furthermore, even in their churches only masses in Romanian was allowed and they checked the worshipers if they pray in Hungarian, and if they were found to do that, they were punished! And the Romanian state did and does today too, everything to Romanize the Csángó's from Moldavia. Today also the Csángó learn only in Romanian in schools. Or how many of those rights and possibilities to use, learn, develop their language, to be represented in the parliament, to develop their culture, were given to the Welsh, Irish, Scots, Britons, and Basques of those times in the countries where they lived? So this propaganda, attacks on Hungary of oppressing its nationalities, on which they based the cruel decisions of giving even Hungarian inhabited lands to the successor states, made by English, French, and Americans, was FALSE!!! In the matter of facts, they could learn from Hungary how to behave with their nationalities, and not accuse her of oppression. As an example of how anti-Hungarian propaganda infected the heads of European politicians, look at the case of Harold Nicolson, an English politician who played a role in designating the Trianonic borders. Here is what he wrote in 1919: "My feelings toward Hungary were less detached. I confess that I regarded and still regard that Turanian tribe (the Magyars) with acute distaste. Like their cousins, the Turks, they had destroyed much and created nothing. Budapest was a false city devoid of any autochtonuous reality. For centuries the Magyars had oppressed their subject nationalities. The hour of liberation and retribution was at hand." You see here the fascistic naming of Hungarians as "oppressing Asian barbarians" like the other English and French politicians also spoke about us, influenced by the Romanians and Czechs. Then some years afterward Harold Nicolson recognized that he was wrong and that the Entente punished Hungary very harshly, based on the propaganda of the Romanians, Czechs, and Serbians: "The Committee on Romanian Claims, for instance, thought only in terms of Transylvania, the Committee on Czech claims concentrated upon the southern frontier of Slovakia. It was only too late that it was realised that these two entirely separate Committees had between them imposed upon Hungary a loss of territory and population which, when combined, was very serious indeed." Or: “Had it been known from the outset that no negotiations would ever take place with the enemy, it is certain that many of the less reasonable clauses of the Treaty would never have been inserted.”i “

[@Optimistic7718]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3qymGinqrBpkNEsi=JR1cRlwQ6O5VZQ2D

[@aphextwin5712]

Yes, and?

[@szalard]

@@aphextwin5712 And what? I gave here some information about the unfair circumstances and effects of Trianon, because they are unknown to the Western public.

[@aphextwin5712]

@ You seem to be fairly emotionally invested in this. Why? And what do you think should happen? Apologies, reparations?

[@szalard]

@@aphextwin5712 It is enough that the world to know about it, because the Romanians, Slovakians, etc., invest much effort to make their propaganda know about it. And, lets ask you: why is important that the world to know about Holocaust, the genocide of Native Americans, Polish, Armenian, Rohingya, Tutsi targedies, and why is not important to know about the Hungarian tragedies? Lets give you an example. Yesterday I read that Hollywood made a movie about the targedy of a Hungarian-Jewish man during the 1930-40's. I think, this is like the 10th movie about the Holocaust of the Hungarian Jews made by Hollywood. But, interestingly, they made no movie about the Hungarian tragedy of 1918-1920, although the Romanian and Czechoslovakian troops made many massacres against the Hungarian civilians during the occupation. The latest researches show at least 5000 deaths among civilian people of Hungarian origin, not to mention the exodus towards Hungary of many hundreds of thousands. And during the WW2, much more tragedies and massacres happened. But no Hollywood movie was made about them. Why? And it is also important to show to the world that the accusations of oppression of nationalities before Trianon were false. Because they partaged Hungary based on these lies. Is that not important to show that these were not true and that, compared to the situation in the countries that accused Hungary of oppression, Hungary behaved most democratically with its nationalities? For example: if somebody accuses you of a bad thing, which is not true, and many believe that, and some of them even beat you, you will say, OK, that is not important to demonstrate to them that you are innocent?

[@tulkosgyorgy]

Just so you understand in this period 2/3 of the population was killed or inslaved by the otomans and before the mongols killed or inslaved 3/4 of the population just 200 yare before. Lets supose this 2 invasion did not hapen today population would be around 45-70 milion ppl in the kingdom of Hungary.

[@KOVROL]

Shortly: we came here from the Urals around 900, became a kingdom in 1000, mongols killed 50% of the population in 1242 (at that time we were around the 4-5.th largest populated EU country, above UK for example). Because of these manpower losses the king called in people from neighboring countries (czehs poles romanians serbs germans) to settle the lands(it will be important in 1920). Our native king dinasty died out in 1301, then we got foreign rulers like Anjou's, Poles etc, we won our last war in 1456, after that we never won a war. Our noob king died at Mohács in 1526 against Suleiman, then the country was split into 3 parts, western and half uppern was went to the Habsburgs (as they could claim the throne through a marriage 50years ago), the eat-uppern was a turkic wassal state, the souht/middle parts was annexed by the turks (ottomans). For 150years the ottomans devastated the middle parts, the population wasnt growth while other western EU poplation was doubled/tripled at that period. So around 1700 there were a call again for neighborung people to settle as there were lot of free unmanned lands (think to 1920 again). Then we did a freedom war against the Habsubrugs as they were the rulers after the ottomans were driven out, but it failed, then we did an another freedom war i 1848-49 where we beat the habsburgs(they were supported by ALL non hungarian nationalities inside tht Kingom of Hungary such as slovaks, romanians serbs croats), but the the emperor asked for assistance from his cousine, the russian tzar, he sent around 300k troops and were outnumbere by 3:1, so freedom failed again. Then habs. lost to the germans in 1866 so we had a great opportunity again but our leaders were pleased with only a union with Austria so we became the Austro-Hungarian Empire, lasted until 1918, dissolved, then the Antant gave 2/3 of our land to the minorities at the outskirts of the kingdom, where there were been slovakia before, only Upper Hungary, Erdély (tranyslvania) was never part of wallachia or moldova, serbs never ruled the Banat, yes Croats had different status, we had personal union with them for around 7-800 years, they got back their 100% freedom, earned it, but the rest was just theft, assisted by france and brits. Then were WW2, not a big deal, just lost 5-600k people, then we got 40 years of communism, after 1990 we got idiot leaders who sell/sold everything to gain more money on their bank account :) this is why we pure and had no word in the EU. But times chaging, we will see the fall of the brirts and frencies inside their own country (by the africans and muslims), great future for them :D

[@Syrenia1552]

An accurate description, although many details are missing, but it is impossible to cover 1100 years of history in a single entry. One "small" episode: the Mongol Khan wrote a letter (which could be called an ultimatum) to King Bela IV to let them march through his country, then they would not be harmed. The king said no, so Hungary defended the west (not for the last time), but it exposed Hungary to Mongol attack. The Mongol army, at the time, was the strongest, best organised army in the known world. We know the rest. (Now I say it's a pity the king didn't accept the Mongol Khan's offer. It wouldn't have hurt the West to have a little 'taste').

[@petererdos3685]

Így hálálta meg a nyugat hogy megvédtük a tatár,később a török pusztításától.Most itt állna egy erős állam köztük meg az oroszok között de nem áll.Félnek is.Hát csak féljenek.

[@microbus432]

Mind you, the demographic maps created by people who never actually set foot on the territories themselves but a few politicians and self proclaimed experts told them their own version.

[@tulkosgyorgy]

This history is far from acurate The Huns are the same people HUNgarians the Avars same Avars the same so we have the so called Skityans witch are in the same family with Huns or Hungarians.

[@lauterunvollkommenheit4344]

Just two thoughts: 1. How do you beat the Mongols? I don't know why the video doesn't mention the second Mongol invasion of Hungary 40 years after the first one. It answered your question authoritatively. 2. I suggest you learn more about the Paris Peace Conference after WWI. Not just because it created states that have ceased to exist since (Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia) but also because the peace treaties were one of the main reasons for WWII. Lenin wrote something like an "imperialist robbers' peace after an imperialist robbers' war". He predicted another war in 20 years.

[@dcsibrak741]

French always wanted to divide Europe in to smaller controllable nations. Especially the monarchy was their problem.

[@attilakovacs2231]

In fact, it's not that Hungary was huge... The greatness and power of the Hungarian Royal dynasties time to time was something you can't even imagine.

[@Optimistic7718]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3qymGinqrBpkNEsi=JR1cRlwQ6O5VZQ2D

[@Someone-wo7yg]

You have no empire any longer. Get over it.

[@attilakovacs2231]

@@Someone-wo7yg Hungary was never an empire in the first place, for the case, if your ignorance was based on something like that.

[@RaduRadonys]

@@attilakovacs2231 An empire is a state that contains other states. That's exactly what Hungary was.

[@attilakovacs2231]

@ Really? LOL

[@Ταργιτάος1]

The real data say something completely different, and I can give you hundreds of examples of how, even in the medieval data, the Hungarians were considered an ancient European Scythian people! By analyzing the contemporary data and comparing it with the latest archaeological and archaeogenetic data, it is increasingly clear that the Magyars were the military tribes that came with Álmos and Árpád, who, according to the chronicles, returned to their Scythian-Hun heritage in the Carpathian basin, where the "Ungars" and "Szeklers" awaited them! I quote from scientific publications of recent years, from the website of the Hungarian Research Institute: ”The presence of the ancestors of today's Hungarians in the Carpathian Basin has been continuous for thousands of years" "A new database of 16,000 mitogenomes of 172 ancient and living populations has been created and investigated their connection system based on artificial intelligence method. The new algorithm recognizes all haplogroup correlations, regardless of the time of the process behind the correlation. A new methodological article has been published in the journal Molecular Genetics and Genomics by the researchers of the Archaeogenetic Research Center of the Hungarian Research Institute, the Department of Genetics of the University of Szeged, the Institute of Technical Physics and Materials Science." "The Carpathian Basin is an unbreakable unit Applying the method to the investigation of the former and present-day populations of the Carpathian Basin, the authors found that the vast majority of the present-day population is from a Copper Age (4500 BC-2800 BC) - Bronze Age (2800 BC-700 BC) can be traced back to a basic population, while immigration from the eastern steppe region seems to have had a smaller genetic impact on the population in the tenth-eleventh centuries." These data confirmed what the Hungarian chroniclers had already written, and some ancient writers also wrote such as Paulus Orosius, who wrote in the 5th century during the time of the Huns, that "...the Huns invaded Pannonia, but the people there call that country Hungaria." From this and many other data, it turned out that Paulus Orosius, who was a Roman writer, had already learned in 417 AD that the Hungarians were the natives here long before the Huns! And what some Hungarian archaeologists and anthropologists have also realized, especially in the last 120 years, that Árpád's people were very few compared to the population here, who stayed here even after the destruction of the Avars and welcomed Árpád's people as well! Archaeologist and historian László Gyula also came to the conclusion after several decades of research and excavations that Árpád's people found Hungarians in large numbers here in the Carpathian Basin, since in many places where Hungarian place names were already in the first descriptions, the so-called "conquerors" did not settle not even close! Archaeologist, historian and geographer Lajos Kiss Marjalaki, who has been researching geographical names for decades, described in the most understandable way what anti-Hungarian historians are hiding from the world on the basis of these ancient names! In his work entitled "Historical Studies", he writes these lines: „At the time of Árpád's occupation, the vast majority of Hungary, especially the eponymous but peasant population of the regions east of the Danube-Garam line - based on the geographical names of Anonymus - could not have been other than Hungarian, because since slavic nouns denoting Bulgarian-Slavic and Czech rule in the 9th century are dwarfed by the mass of more ancient Ugric-Hungarian names denoting larger geographical objects. None of the river names with Hungarian names mentioned in Anonymus's gesta has yet been proven to have been called something else before! But this is not likely, because the Danube, Tisza, Szamos, Körös, Temes, Olt, Zala, Rába, Balaton, etc. are known from sources before the 10th century. our waters also kept their old names, although their shores were known from history as Dacians, Celts, Illyrians, Romans, Sarmatians, Germans, Huns, Avars, Bulgarians, Slavs and Hungarians. It should be noted that if the Hungarian-speaking common people had only come to our country with Árpád, then there would be no Hungarian vineyard names in our earliest certificates. And there are quite a few of them already. Who were the original inhabitants of Transylvania? The crown witnesses of this case are the river names. And the water names of the landscapes east of the Tisza, both in Anonymus and in Ortvay's two-volume collection of water names from Árpád's time, as well as the water names that have developed in the course of history and are still in use today, and which have been commonplace in the Hungarian, Transylvanian Saxon and Romanian languages, indisputably testify to Hungarian origin and Hungarian aboriginal population. Some examples: Szamos, Almás, Kapus, Sár, Körös, Tekerő, Tur, Maros, Poklos, Hölgyes, Hódos, Gyepes, Medgyes, Barca, Olt, Árpás, Hévíz, Sebes, Nádas, Kékes, Aranyos, Bodza, Homoród, Hideg, Lápos… Not one of the larger river names has an Romanian name, but they also use the same names as the Hungarians and Saxons. Witnesses of the primacy of the population, the river names thus testify to the certainty of Hungarian ancestry."

[@CocoSon-we2rg]

Valach ethnonym equivalent to ro(u)mân has numerous variants: :Vlah/ Vlăhiţa/ Vlaşca/ Vlăsia/ Vlasi/ Vlaşin/ (W)Volos(ch) (Slavic, Greek); Voloseni/ Voloch/ Voloscani/ Vlhost/ Vlachy/ Valaska/ Vlaca/ Vlahovica/ Vlasatice Vlachovo; Woloska(i)/ Woloszyn (Polish); Voloh/ Volosin/ Vlas (Russian); Walache, Bloch (Saxon German), Blach/ Blachowka/ Blahui/ Blasc/ Bolohov; Oláh/ Olászi/Ol(l)áşag/ Olásig/ Oláhok (Magh.); Morlac; Felah (Egypt). The plurality of names given to the same people by its neighbors is noteworthy. Italians are called by Poles - wloch(i), and by Hungarians - olasz(ok). The presence of Romanians in Central and Eastern Europe, the Carpathian Mountains and the Balkan Peninsula . Dr. Aurel V. David (The toponymic battle between Dacia and Romania throughout history. rev. Dacia Magazin, no. 101, 2014, p. 8) shows that "the Wallachians, considered by the ancient Greeks as gods/divine/Pelasgians, created an empire vast with the political-administrative and religious center in the Carpathian area, which stretched across Europe, northern Africa and part of Asia". Romania - Jud. Cluj - Vlaha, village com. Savadisla, Mr. Feleahului, alt. 480 m. Vlaha-Jara, Depr. subunit between Mr. Feleahului and M-ţii Gilău - Mount Mare. Jud. Harghita - Vlăhita, town, M-ţii Harghitei, alt. 840 m. Jud. Constanta - Vlahii/ Vlah Chioi, village com. Aliman, Pod. Oltina, another. 20 m. Jud. Olt - Vlaşca, stream, afl. Dr. r. Tesla, long. 15 m, confl. other. 128 m, NW Bobeanu. Jud. Dolj - disbanded village, included in the village of Golfin, com. Robanesti. Jud. Ialomiţa - Vlaşca, place comp. town Feteşti, C. Mostiştei, other. 50 m. Jud. Bacău - disbanded village, included in the village and com. Casin. Jud. Teleorman - incorporated Jud. Vlasca abolished. Jud. Galati - Vlășcuţa, the lake, Cul. Prut, another. 6 m, 41.8 ha, com. Mastacani. Jud. Argeş - Vlăşcuţa, village com. Stolnici, C. Găvanu-Burdea, other. 200 m; mound, alt. 237 m, C. Găvanu-Burdea, SV Costeşti. Cl. Vlaşcului, cl. main of the Cerna Mountains, Southern Carpathians, Vf. The good ones, another. 1 928 m. Jud. Giurgiu - Vlaşin, C. Burnazului, village, com. Hermitage, other. 80 m. Jud. Giurgiu - County Ilfov - Vlaşinu, forest, other. 85 m. Jud. Sălaj - Dealul Vlaşinului, M-ţii Meseșului, NE Ciucea, other. 840 m. Jud. Dâmboviţa - Vlăsceni, village, com. Potlogs. Jud. Ilfov - Câmpia Vlăsiai, subunit of C. Române, E. Gumăneşti, other. 50-100 m; Vlăsia, mound, other. 89 m, C. Vlăsiei; the forest of Vlăsia, other. 100 m, C. Vlăsiei, NW Săftica; Vlăsia, stream, afl. of Caldăruşani Lake, long. 35 km, water. other. 77 m, SV Fierbinti. Jud. Botoşani - Vlăsineşti, village, commune, C. Jijiei Superiori, alt. 100 m. Jud. Vaslui - Voloseni140 m,Jud. Vrancea - Voloşcani, Vrancei Subcarpathia, village com. Otter, alt. 260 m; tops, other. 260 m. Jud. Suceava - Volovăţ.Blah: Jud. Gorj - Blahniţa, river, afl. Dr. r. Gilort, 53 km long, alt. 194 m, SW Tg. Coal. Jud. Mehedinţi - Blahnita, river, afl. St. fl. Danube, 56 km long, confl. other. 30 m, S. Gogoşu. Gorjului Subcarpathians - Blahniţa de Sus, village, com. Săcelu, another. 480 m and Blahniţa de Jos, a village belonging to the town of Tg. Carbunesti, other. 250 m. Jud. Dolj - Câmpia Blahniţei, subunit in the W. part of C. Oltenia, between fl. Danube and r. Drincea, another. 180 m. Jud. Vrancea - Blahui, cl., other. 140 m, Vrancei Subcarpathians, SE Paunesti. Bolohan, stream, afl. Dr. r. Siret, 10 km long, confl. other. 110 m, N Adjud. Olah: Jud. Giurgiu - Grindul Olahilor, alt. 17 m, Lunca Dunării, NW Gostinu. Jud. Timiş - Ohaba Română/ former village O. Olah, attested 1427. The Balkan Peninsula - in the early Middle Ages there were 15 Vlachs, states occupied by a predominantly Romanian population. Bulgaria - Vlahi village S of Sofia; other localities near the capital are called Vlaşca, Vlaşca Mala, Volosic, Vlasca, Vlasi, Vlascobârdo, Vlahina, Vlaskidel. Vlaskidol, S Tojavevac and Vlahar villages, l. Varna. Balcic - Vlahmalesi slum. In the area of ​​Timoc on the border with Serbia is com. Vlasca and place. Documentary attested Vlasotince (16th century) l. river Vlasina/ Vlasna afl. Morava. A mountain system is called Vlasitsch Planina. Vlahi/ Olahi/ Ilahi reg. Blagoevgrad, SW of the country. Bela Vlaska, S. Serbia - Cazanelor/Gherdap region, predominantly populated by Romanians has the ethnonym Vlasac. Jud. Pomoravlje net Cuprija - place. Vlaska. Bosnia-Herzegovina - called in ancient times by the Serbs Starâi Vlah/ Old Romanians has the land of Romanija l. the town of Pale, where Mount Românilor/ Romanija is located, alt. 1,627 m, Vlašic and Cer Mts.; the towns of Vlaseniča, Vlahović, Stari-Vlah, Donji, Gornji Vakuf, Vesela, Pepelari, Stupari, Potocari. Croatia - ins. Rab, Vlasche Njine (Field of the Vlachs)/ Kampor act.; Vlaka, village l. Senj; Mount Morlacilor/ Act Velebit, NW Dalmatia. Zagreb, the name of the boulevard Vlaska street. Montenegro - Mount Rumia. Greece - the city of Volos, Pagastic Gulf on the Aegean Sea.Kuttemberg (65 km SW Prague), known for the exploitation of silver deposits, there is the Vlasski Palace (15th century) built on the site of an earlier construction (UNESCO World Heritage, Central and Northern Europe, 1997, p.251, Edit. Schei Braşov ). SE of Prague in the upper basin of the Elbe we meet the oiconym Vlašim. In the Krkonosze Transfrontier National Park/ Giant Mountains in the Sudetenland between Poland and the Czech Republic, in addition to other toponyms of Romanian origin (e.g. Peticesti, Javor/ Izvor) there are the ethnotoponyms Vlasške most/ Wallachian Bridge, hamlet; Vlasšky vrch/ Vf. Wallachian, other. 1,035 m; Vlhky dul/ Wallachian Valley, alt. 1 300 m; Vlhost - hill, alt. 613.5 m, and forest (locality Litice); Wlsovy vrch/ Vf. Valahulu). Northern Moravia - place. Sneznic Vlaske u Hanusovic, Valasške Mezirici, Valasška Polanka, Valasške Klobouky, Vlahovice, Valasške Krlovstvy/ Wallachian Cradle (E Czech Republic), Woloszczyna Moravska/ Wallachian Moravia between the Sudeten and Carpathian mountains at Brama Moravska/ Poarta Morava, Vlasatice (Brno), Vlachovo Brezi. Austrian and German atlases mention the land of Wallachia, whose main city was Meziriciuk Valahi/ Walahisch Mezeritsch/ Valaska Mezirici/Valasske Mezirio. Slovakia - place Vlachy, alt. 528 m, l. Liptovski Mikulas, Spisskie Vlachy, Vlachovo, other. 1,000 m, Valaska, V. Bela, V. Dubova, others. 649 m, V. Podbrezova, V. Bystrice, Valasske Klobouky, Vlarsky Prusmyk - Vrsatec (High Tatras), Vlaca l. Giraltovice (Beskizi Mountains), Vlašim, Vlahovo, Blahova, Rumanova. Hungary - place Daka (M. Bocioacă, no. 48, 2008). Poland - Tatra Mountains - Blascacka Dolina, Polanie Wolosienica, Wolosienica,, Woloszyn, alt. 2 036-2 155 m, Skrajny Woloszyn, alt. 2 090 m, Nyz. Woloszynska, alt. 2 036 m, loc. Blachowka; Wolosate (Beskizi mountains), Tirawa Woloska, Krolik Wolowski, Cobalnica Woloska; Lodinia used to be Villa Walachica, Woloski selo, Bolohov woloski, Valaska Dubova. Wlochy place. S M's Lysa Gora. Ukraine - hydronyms Wolosatka, Wolodsatczyk; place. Voloscisna, Kamianka Voloska, Voloca, Volohi, Bolechov; Vila Valahorum - Galicia. Russia - Reg. Kurgan in the Siberian tundra close to the river delta. Iana, which flows into the Laptev Sea (the Arctic Ocean) is a place. Vlasovo, alt. 10 m. Turkey - place Blakia near Mt. Olympus, province historical Bithynia (Cr. Cerchez, p. 63).There was no way you could translate them all into Hungarian.

[@zoltanberenyi5091]

@@CocoSon-we2rg Sadly, there is not a shred of archeological proof behind that. So, it is all pseudo-linguistic bullshit.

[@gergelyoskolas182]

8:40 yes and no. Because the plan was not just to conquer Habsburg and Bohemian territory. The plan was that he becames the Holy Roman Emperor and therefore a soverign over those potential would be enemies. Also Austria (Habsburgs) were very opportunistic they did try to take territories from us (Hungary) when we were campaigning against the ottomans. But he could not conclude his plans because of his early death. He was only 47 years old and in good health.

[@annamariamoldovan4901]

I live in Transilvania, grew up in a town called Marosvásárhely/Targu-Mures. When I was 3 years old we mooved to a brand new neighbourhood and new apartment building. In that building there were 17 apartments. Out of the 17 two were bought by hungarian speaking families, 15 were GIVEN for free to romanian speaking families as a gift, these families were brought in from romanian territories. Same thing happened to all Transilvanian cities, the purpose was to change the hungarian population to romanian population… My father was born in 48, my mom is 55. They can barely remember a few romanian families from their youth… . Just so you know…

[@RaduRadonys]

Don't tell us stories to put children to sleep mate.

[@H0RG0NY0S]

​@@RaduRadonys Traitor pls

[@ihateidiots3880]

​Are dreptate. In Strada noAstra erau 3 familii de Romani. Vecina nu a vorbit limba Romana nici in Ani 2000 cand a murit. Acuma mai sunt 2 familii maghiare din care unul e doar un betiv. ​@@RaduRadonys

[@Syrenia1552]

@@RaduRadonys Romania got more territory from Hungary than it had left, because the French wanted the Transylvanian resources. That is why Romania became a French colony. (Today the French are replaced by the Americans.)

[@0Defensor0]

Trianon is, and always will be an insult to Hungary, not just because of it's severity, but because it's complete unfairness. The Hungarian delegation was arrested when they arrived, and were only released when they had to unconditionally accept the treaty. Romania is an interesting case, they got the biggest portion (bigger than what is left), even though they only had about one battle against Hungary - which they lost, and they only joined the Entente in the last possible moment, when their victory was basically guaranteed. Also, Austria has got some land too, even though they were on the losing side and basically responsible for the whole war. This treaty is impossible to defend, literally everything is wrong with it.

[@RaduRadonys]

Wrong for you maybe, excellent for Romania, Slovakia and your other neighbors.

[@GM-os6fo]

Yes, for you gypsies from Bucurest and craiova ​who got a new country as a gift @RaduRadonys

[@adiszucs7776]

@@RaduRadonys It's bad for the Hungarians, yes, because they have always been an honest and straightforward people who do not tolerate deceitful lies and intrigues, but the truth is on the side of the Hungarians, and as usual, it always rises to the surface and takes revenge for injustice. It's just a matter of time.

[@RaduRadonys]

@@adiszucs7776 What are you saying, that Hungary will become again big like in the 19th century?

[@adiszucs7776]

@@RaduRadonys I'm just saying that lies always come to the surface, sooner or later the truth will come out. I hope that those who were the perpetrators of this act are turning in their graves and cannot find peace, all of them! By the way, I would like to see your reactions if you had to return the stolen ancient Hungarian territories. You would deserve it along with all the liars. Think about it and imagine how the Hungarians must have felt about Trianon and how they still feel today!

[@bbenjoe]

In 1910, Hungary's territory was at 325,411 km2 with a population of 20,886,487. However of that only 48.3% were Hungarians. The other 52% were made up by nationalities like: Croatians, Germans, Romanians, Ruthenians, Serbians and Slovaks. In small numbers ethnicities like Poles, Slovenians and even Italians were also present.

[@korajocka]

Justice for Hungary!

[@danielvereb4579]

Sorry but I love history so I make another comment. To explain why Matthias Corvinus attacked the Holy Roman Empire and risked fighting on two fronts. It had been the plan of many hungarian kings to gain the holy Roman Emperor title. Sigismund did it but he was also blood related. For Matthias, the problem was, he was not of royalty. He was a noble, who was elected as king because there was no royal bloodline anymore. His father had fought the Ottomans for decades and the Western powers did not support Hungary at all. They didn't care. So attacking a weak Austria and HRE was a low risk with high reward. Meanwhile the Border Fortresses along the southern border were able to defend the kingdom. Only later, when weak kings switched out the standing armies there for mercenaries did the southern border fall. Mercenaries simply surrendered and that's how the Ottomans gained ground so fast. Oh and he had the support of the Pope and Italy to some extent.

[@microbus432]

Thevreason I disagree with your hypothesis is the fact that the King of Hungary wore the Holy Crown. The pope needs the approval of the Crown not the other way around.

[@dcsibrak741]

Im kinda surprised that there is no mocking in the comments from Slovaks Romanians and Czech, they usually mock us, I still do respect them as a Hungarian because we can't change history, no point to hurt them in any way. In the other hand, the only era we had great respect was when the Scourge of god Attila was leading our Nomadic tribes. Im not sayn, Attila was very violent, maybe people wasn't even respecting us but fear from us, atleast we had a standing in the world. Respect for everyone.

[@ember8718]

Mathias wanted to be The Holy Roman Emperor. That's why hé was gaining territory. If he'd became a Holy Roman Emperor he would had a easier job pushing back The Ottomans.

[@ilonafarkas4991]

Remellem Magyarorszag visza veszi az oszes teratorit ami hozza tartozik eljen Magyar orszag bekeben es harcoljon azert ami o hozza tartozik

[@freebozkurt9277]

Trick of showing nationalities is as follows: areas, that are Hungary today are flat lands and rather densely populated. Areas that are detached from Hungary are mountainous and sparsely populated. It served the anti-Hungarian propaganda to colour the unpopulated areas with colours representing foreign (Slovak, Romanian etc.) populations. Just imagine how different that map would show if all those unpopulated mountains were coloured showing Hungarian populations. You can find on the net proper maps that show only white colour where no peope lived, correctly. These maps also does not show where Hungarians were just below 50%, all these areas are indicated as they were pure Slovak or Romanian etc.

[@freebozkurt9277]

hu.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%A1jl:Ethnographic_map_of_hungary_1910_by_teleki_carte_rouge.jpg

[@donkotibor]

What they did to Hungary was crime! That crime still exist!

[@danielvereb4579]

It always puzzled me as a Magyar, that the Mongols, who had similar type of warfare as us, could defeat us so easily. Aside from their overwhelming numbers, the Mongols also had great engineers. They had better technology, like better siege equipment. Ruthless tactics, like launching diseased carcasses into cities. Though that was used by other powers of the time. Another interesting fact was that IV. Béla King of Hungary did not take the threat seriously. He did not build a strong army, thinking "We Magyars had left the old nomadic lifestyle behind. We are mor sophisticated, we have knights etc. we are better." And they were ambushed in the night, totally decimated at Muhi. Also no stone castles. Later he learned this lesson and built Stone Castles everywhere. When the Mongols came a second time, they failed because they could not break those castles.

[@Ταργιτάος1]

The big mistake is that, unfortunately, you do not understand the real data about Hungarians, because this is deliberately hidden from the Hungarians and from the world, which is why the directors of the "Magyarságkutató Intézet" - Hungarian research institute were fired, because they started talking to us about the real data! In order for you to understand what I am talking about, I will quote real data from the genetic results of the Hungarian Research Institute: „The presence of the ancestors of today's Hungarians in the Carpathian Basin has been continuous for thousands of years" „A new database of 16,000 mitogenomes of 172 ancient and living populations has been created and investigated their connection system based on artificial intelligence method. The new algorithm recognizes all haplogroup correlations, regardless of the time of the process behind the correlation. A new methodological article has been published in the journal Molecular Genetics and Genomics by the researchers of the Archaeogenetic Research Center of the Hungarian Research Institute, the Department of Genetics of the University of Szeged, the Institute of Technical Physics and Materials Science." „The Carpathian Basin is an unbreakable unit Applying the method to the investigation of the former and present-day populations of the Carpathian Basin, the authors found that the vast majority of the present-day population is from a Copper Age (4500 BC-2800 BC) - Bronze Age (2800 BC-700 BC) can be traced back to a basic population, while immigration from the eastern steppe region seems to have had a smaller genetic impact on the population in the tenth-eleventh centuries." These data confirmed what the Hungarian chroniclers had already written, and some ancient writers also wrote such as Paulus Orosius, who wrote in in 417 AD. during the time of the Huns, that "...the Huns invaded Pannonia, but the people there call that country Hungaria." From this and many other data, it turned out that in 417 AD the Hungarians were the natives here long before the Huns! And what some Hungarian archaeologists and anthropologists have also realized, especially in the last 120 years, that Árpád's people were very few compared to the population here, who stayed here even after the destruction of the Avars and welcomed Árpád's people as well! Archaeologist and historian László Gyula also came to the conclusion after several decades of research and excavations that Árpád's people found Hungarians in large numbers here in the Carpathian Basin, since in many places where Hungarian place names were already in the first descriptions, the so-called "conquerors" did not settle not even close! And archaeologist, historian and geographer Marjalaki Kiss Lajos describes the real origin of the Hungarians in a most understandable based on geographical names in his work entitled "Historical Studies": „At the time of Árpád's occupation, the vast majority of Hungary, especially the eponymous but peasant population of the regions east of the Danube-Garam line - based on the geographical names of Anonymus - could not have been other than Hungarian, because since slavic nouns denoting Bulgarian-Slavic and Czech rule in the 9th century are dwarfed by the mass of more ancient Ugric-Hungarian names denoting larger geographical objects. None of the river names with Hungarian names mentioned in Anonymus's gesta has yet been proven to have been called something else before! But this is not likely, because the Danube, Tisza, Szamos, Körös, Temes, Olt, Zala, Rába, Balaton, etc. are known from sources before the 10th century. our waters also kept their old names, although their shores were known from history as Dacians, Celts, Illyrians, Romans, Sarmatians, Germans, Huns, Avars, Bulgarians, Slavs and Hungarians. It should be noted that if the Hungarian-speaking common people had only come to our country with Árpád, then there would be no Hungarian vineyard names in our earliest certificates. And there are quite a few of them already. Who were the original inhabitants of Transylvania? The crown witnesses of this case are the river names. And the water names of the landscapes east of the Tisza, both in Anonymus and in Ortvay's two-volume collection of water names from Árpád's time, as well as the water names that have developed in the course of history and are still in use today, and which have been commonplace in the Hungarian, Transylvanian Saxon and Vlach languages, indisputably testify to Hungarian origin and Hungarian aboriginal population. Some examples: Szamos, Almás, Kapus, Sár, Körös, Tekerő, Tur, Maros, Poklos, Hölgyes, Hódos, Gyepes, Medgyes, Barca, Olt, Árpás, Hévíz, Sebes, Nádas, Kékes, Aranyos, Bodza, Homoród, Hideg, Lápos… Not one of the larger river names has an Vlach name, but they also use the same names as the Hungarians and Saxons. Witnesses of the primacy of the population, the river names thus testify to the certainty of Hungarian ancestry." With this and a hundred times more data, I can prove that the majority were not the military tribes that came with Árpád, but the Ungars - Hungarians who had settled long ago and were called "székhelyiek" - locals, and I think that is where the name of the "szék" came from! But since we know very well that they changed their name to Székely, because the Hungarians transcribed it over time as the name of Erdély, which was originally Erdőelve, which I think these ancient Székely - Szekler people called it that way. These Ugrian Szeklers were the majority here when the people of Álmos and Árpád Mogyerians arrived here, and they probably invited them here, because they were already oppressed by foreigners in the west and south! Several people have already realized this, such as László Gyula, Vékony Gábor and Bakay Kornél, but only the academic historians hide the data about them. They could also be mistakenly called Onogurs, and even to this day there are theories that the Szeklers are the descendants of the Onogurs, but in fact they were from all the remaining ancient Hungarian-speaking populations here, who became the majority under the Juan-Juan Avars. So in short, we all mostly come from this population, who were not very Slavized and certainly did not mix with the Germanic tribes either, but there were still Scythian and Sarmatian tribes among them! And then the point is that this explains the campaigns of the Mogyerian tribes that lasted more than seventy years, because here they had a strong Hungarian hinterland, who themselves joined the battles many times, but only in the battles for national defense, and that is why the Szeklers had their ancient law, that they always fought only for the defense of the homeland and rarely went further than the Carpathians! That is why the Hungarian base population was never as warlike a people as the Mongols or, before that, the Huns, Avars and Magyars, and that is why they were not able to defend the country with such strength for the first time in 1241, especially because by that time the Mogyerians, had already merged with the "Székhelyi" - Hungarians, and they forgot the swift steppe fighting style!

[@f_8v46dt3..-zja_d]

According to the Trianon logics, the UK should be now Arabia and the US, Spanish. Funny, isn't it?

[@DeusVult-q3f]

Sometimes it's not about strong and advanced technology that does the job. The magic of Asians in general is that they are very calculative and thinking people. You see, we Europeans used metal armor, while they in the other hand used wood as armor, which can trap swords, spears and other blades to stuck inside and enemies would not be able to pull it out. So basically wood armor is a glue for weapons. They had amazing brain for the war.

[@balintkovacs4089]

I will not even get into detail about how much misinformation is in that sentence, but I will say that the Mongols defeating us is mostly embarrassing because they used the same tactics and technologies that we ourselves used on the rest of Europe before 1000 AD. And even so, the Battle of Muhi - a u, not an o - wasn't as one-sided as it's often told. The Mongolian heavy cavalry tried taking the bridge over the river held by our own knights and was unable to do so. Our fatal mistake was digging in into a wagon fort for the night - as was customary at the time - and so when the Mongols forded the river at night, by the next day our army had no room to manouver since we statified ourselves in the first place.

[@DeusVult-q3f]

@@balintkovacs4089 Accusing other people you don't know at all ''misinformation'' in order to feed your ego is very bad start, while you use only 1 detail of few battles which are also not correct. Hungarians did not use same technology as Mongols and neither same tactic. They were simply smarter and more tactical and had better logistics until Gengis Khan died. Plus Hungarians used mostly leather or linen armor. Also they forged wooden armor much more denser than nations before 1000 AD and the wood that is dense can act like a glue which was always their highest advantage, while Europeans switched into metal armor.

[@DeusVult-q3f]

@@balintkovacs4089 Also digging in into wagon fort for the night was not ''fatal mistake'' it was the key option to secure already army that would be destroyed even if we would not have done that, Mongols would eventually succeed regardless.

[@lastsayain]

the ottomans didnt have any borders in central asia or in south asia because of the safavids empire (persia/iran). the safavid persians were one of the ottomans biggest rivals.react to the video called why the ottomans never counquerd persia by knowledgia it gives you more information about them in the middle east.

[@Optimistic7718]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3qymGinqrBpkNEsi=JR1cRlwQ6O5VZQ2D

[@interstellar.overdrive]

@@Optimistic7718 great that you keep spamming this link everywhere, that way I know it's not worth opening

[@hunguy3280]

After reading most of the comments, and Mr Connors input, I get the impression that he did not understand or maybe he does not appreciate the depths of this unfair punishment, and/or the illegal destruction of a 1,000- year- old Kingdom. Maybe, according to him, the Truncation of the Kingdom of Hungary should have been more severe, to the point that the Nation of Hungary should have been deleted from the World Map! The US representatives eventually did agree to this proposal; however, the UK representatives vetoed this decision, saying that "Little Hungary May Remain without a King".

[@ClifffSVK]

If you think it was unfair, then it's you who doesn't understand it. Oh well, the Hungarian education system...

[@ibranyimarcell3686]

Sorry BUT Huns and Avars are also Hungarian

[@DjJoe4682]

Does Trianon hurt for you guys too?

[@DD-ob3zm]

Én magyar vagyok és a trianoni békeszerzödés egy olyan dolog amit nem felejtünk és még mindig salynáljuk ami történt mivel az egész igaságtalan volt mivel ugy büntetek hogy nem tetünk semit😔

[@tamashorvath375]

salynáljuk tetünk semit XD

[@DD-ob3zm]

@tamashorvath375 ezt hogy érted?

[@balintkovacs4089]

@@tamashorvath375 És főleg "igaSágtalan" ;)

[@balintkovacs4089]

@DD-ob3zm Úgy, hogy amíg nem megy az alapvető helyesírás, tanulni kéne kommentelés helyett.

[@DD-ob3zm]

@@balintkovacs4089 amugy tudok irni és szomorú hogy nincs jób dolgod mint ki javitani valakit

[@jjekedjrjkdkdkejdjskdnxidj9344]

Justice to Hungary!! Trianon was a dictatum to my country!! Transcarphatia,Transilvania, Voivodina must give back to Hungary!

[@RaduRadonys]

Let's hold a referendum in those areas and see what they decide, shall we?

[@NapiRockAndRoll]

@@RaduRadonys I know a Romanian guy. Big fan of Elvis, he even was in a Romanian talent show in the TV, I like him. He got Hungarian name, his grandfather was "János bácsi" but can speak Hungarian only a little bit. He lives in Satrun now. Would he vote for Hungary?

[@RaduRadonys]

@@NapiRockAndRoll Not sure, but it's irrelevant. What's relevant is the majority vote.

[@jjekedjrjkdkdkejdjskdnxidj9344]

@RaduRadonys referendum why? was make referendum when those lands was broken from Hungary? NO! so why making now referendum?🤔

[@RaduRadonys]

@@jjekedjrjkdkdkejdjskdnxidj9344 Because now we live in a democracy, we live in a world where the people have the power, unlike what has happening 100 years ago.

[@vercingetorix264]

AD. 896. Justice for Hungary!

[@1Anime4you]

A concave composite bow, Connor! A concave composite bow!

[@Optimistic7718]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3qymGinqrBpkNEsi=JR1cRlwQ6O5VZQ2D

[@bujdososzekely]

Viktor Orban prime minister of Hungary statement about the shameful Trianon Dictate in Jun 4. 1920. kzbin.info/www/bejne/mWLKnotjYtaGqrs

[@vorosmaria2182]

Nagyon aranyos vagy ❤

[@Geri11Official]

He Miss the 1850 Rebellion

[@ki5739]

Try Austria, Bulgaria, Denmark in their haydays and now.

[@tamasdr.keresztesi188]

As a Hungarian I just really want to share the real historically facts: at that time there was no such countries like "Slovakia" or "Romania" or "Bosnai" and so on...but anyway I like your vid thanks for the upload

[@RaduRadonys]

Or Germany, or Italy, or USA, etc, etc, etc. What's your point?

[@adiszucs7776]

@@RaduRadonys Your people, the Vlachs, are first mentioned in historical writings only in the 13th century, when you appeared on the southern slopes of the Carpathians with your grazing flocks. The Hungarian kingdom admitted you into the Hungarian kingdom, and they were even happy for you, because the country was after the devastating Tatar invasion. You expressed your gratitude for this at Trianon.

[@RaduRadonys]

@ Dude, let's not get into the debate "who was the first in Transylvania, Hungarians or Romanians", shall we? We both know that we don't agree on that and there's nothing anyone can do.

[@adiszucs7776]

@@RaduRadonys I have no problem with you or your siblings, I just don't like lies.

[@delmaticodsh5281]

Will you react to szegetwar battle 1566 croatian hungarian army vs turkey kzbin.info/www/bejne/iZrPh4unmcuZrZYsi=yOloW_PBhdJCi7ZX

[@Optimistic7718]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3qymGinqrBpkNEsi=JR1cRlwQ6O5VZQ2D

[@BoshiNagare]

with plenty of native minorities!

[@AncientCore]

Peace & Love from Romania, brothers and sisters! 💙💛❤🤍💚

[@ariszanimaciok]

2 interesting facts: In 1922 there was a vote, if Sopron should go to Austria or Hungary, which gave Hungary the town and some other small regions. After WW2, Hungary lost 2 towns to Czechoslovakia

[@interstellar.overdrive]

Would be interesting to see the results of such a vote held in Sopron today 😂

[@MorfWolf]

Hungary in WW I - bad side and lost Hungary in WW II - bad side and lost Hungary now? - chose Putin Hungary did not disappoint. Always on bad side, always on looser side.

[@darauovidiualexandru1855]

Where it was Hungary before Jesus 100 year a go

[@Pannoncsip]

❤🤍💚

[@alexandrutomescu4146]

The boy has big gaps in his historical education.He is not worth watching.

[@adiszucs7776]

Hasn't he read your Romanian historians?🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@DeDe-dk6po]

Ja ez nagy szopás nekünk.

[@iraf.official]

😎😎

[@gergelyoskolas182]

4:04 "short lived" Well Hungary been there for 300 years there by than. To contrast that, @McJibbin You are from USA. The USA will celebrate it's 250th of existance this year. I know that we could count from the british era but I think it is fair. I do not consider 300 or 250 years short lived.

[@robertkokeny9418]

Tis background music is horror!

[@nanszonanasi4663]

A lot of fake information in this video about Hungarian history.

[@petervagvolgyi9084]

Hun vannak a magyar kommentek?!

[@ares1634]

As a Transylvanian Romanian, majority in Transylvania and Pannonia since Daco - Roman times, I'd tell you to cut the crap with this Hungarian propaganda. Same would tell you the Slovaks, Croatians, Serbs, Czechs or other former Celtic -Germanic people, occupied and enslaved aftr 9 century by a savage Magyar Uralic minority elite. These early guys vanished before 13 century AD.

[@Syrenia1552]

Name one place name, river, valley, mountain whose name is of Vlach origin (The Romanian vernacular name only came into fashion in the 19th century, until then they were called Oláhs, Vlachs.) Name a single archaeological find that is 'Daco-Roman'. You can't, because there isn't one. The Vlachs began to infiltrate Transylvania in the 12th century. Otherwise they migrated from the Balkans and settled in the Wallachian and Moldva. You won't find any medieval map showing present-day Romania.

[@ares1634]

@@Syrenia1552 You must be fallen from the propaganda of hungarian tree and I don't have a week to write dissertations in youtube comments about various stages of attested Romanians, from the Tisa river in the west to the Dnieper river in the east and from north Carpathians to the Mediterranean and the Adriatic sea, from early medieval times to the occupation of Budapest in 1919.

[@ares1634]

@@Syrenia1552 You must be fallen from the propaganda hungarian tree and I don't have a week to write dissertations in the comments sections about various stages of attested Romanians, from the Tisa river in the west to the Dnieper river in the east and from the north Carpathians to the Mediterranean and Adriatic sea. From early medieval times to lets say the occupation of Budapest and Hungary in 1919.

[@ares1634]

@@Syrenia1552 Just a few remarks Vlachs are attested by few Chronicles as being the indigenous people in Pannonia and Transylvania, living along Slavs and were always a majority in the Carpathian region and Romanian was lingua franca in Transylvania since ever and during medieval times. Then you are so simple as to imply that Romanians migrated from the Balkans, in countries attested as being created by themselves. Go take your pills.

[@Petereee712]

@@ares1634 source bro trust me

[@Thomas_the_Noble]

The thing about the Relations of Matthias (Corvinus) Hunyadi (since 1458 chosen king NOT crowned) and Austria was that (Emperor) Frederick III of Austria had the Hungarian Crown for 2 decades. Matthias entered into an alliance with the Emperor's rebellious brother Albert VI, Archduke of Austria, after that the Treaty is signed in 1463. But there were also later conflicts about that. Here you can read more info about it if you want en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthias_Corvinus#War_for_Austria_(1479%E2%80%931487). Also in 1556 the Principality of Upper Hungary did not exist yet, that territory mainly belonged to the Royal Crown (Austrians) only during the 1682-1685 it did exist.

[@leomarin2205]

the map is wrong, ukraina does not exist

[@vorosmaria2182]

❤🥰

[@ibranyimarcell3686]

So many bs

[@kerotomas1]

8:37 As a hungarian this is exactly what i've been saying. I don't regard Matthias Corvinus highly as he basically made the "West" our enemy and had no one to turn to when the Ottomans invaded with full force starting in 1526 with the battle of Mohács. The borders during World War 2 was the best after Trianon as they were mostly Hungarian majority lands restored (except with a strip in the middle of Northern Transylvania kinda like a corridor) but after WW2 most Hungarians were expelled from those territories and so nowadays none of the lands outside of the current borders have majority.

[@copiaka]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/b4rYqmqqqausgZI

[@MrMama-we9wl]

As a former International studies MA student of Ludovika University of Public Service I just want to add some critical information about this map. First the area that is today Slovakia and Croatia were never ever fully integrated into the kingdom, the minorities payed tax but they could use their own language and practice their culture. Moreover the total hungarian population never was over 50% of the total population of the Hungarian Kingdom. More appropriate would be to use the Austro-Hungarian Monarch's map. On that case the hungarian portion would be even smaller. The monarch was a multicultural, multiethnic, multilingual empire. The forced hungarization on the 'Hungarian side' of the monarch from the 1880s alienated almost all minorities. It's not a surprise all minorities wanted to break straight away from Hungarian vassals even before WWI. it was a struggle for them constantly. Today the map 'Greater Hungarian Kingdom' is the byproduct of the Horthy era revisionist propaganda. This so called kingdom with this borders never existed! This 'turanist' movement lead to the alliance with the 3rd Reich 1936 which has ended badly. In short this map is BS and has no relevance. Tatra mountains were always dominated by slovaks, and Zagreb was always the capital of the croats. The debate is much more difficult in case of Transylvania, Northern Serbia and Zakarpattia (South Western Ukraine). On this territories hungarians formed pretty dense communities and they did not mix with the local romanian and slavic population (actually there were rules written by the Habsburgs how minorities can organize themselfs, for the Habsburgs hungarians were also just a minority they ruled over). On the other hand Hungarian were never ever the absolute majority within the Carpathians. Many hungarians disagree with this facts but this is what it is. St Stephen the First 1001 made a genocide on his own people (30% was killed) after the mongolians made a genocide 1241 (60% was killed), after the turks ruled for 150 years 1541-1699. The territory was filled up with immigrants again and again (every time christian white europeans the only exception were the gypsies arriving somewhere before the ottomans) Demographics data never lies. Just like DNA - Hungarians are a mixture of everything you can find in Eastern Europe. History books are written by the winners. Meanwhile Hungarians are very good at loosing. When Trianon was decided the hungarians have sent the same diplomats who tried to break the swiss economy by smuggling fake franks into Zurich during the world war 1914-1918 of course they failed. Rumors say that the map of Hungary today was based on the shape and size of the left palm of Pal Teleki (the lead diplomat of the delegation sent to the peace talks). The swiss-french hosts told him to place his palm on the map, where the most hungarians live. They just cut off the territoris that were not covered by his left palm on the map. That shape has become the map of Hungary as we know it today. (after the Trianon agreement had been signed Pal Teleki ended his life with a gunshot). Timing also did not help. Southern slavic people united under Jugoslavia and the war made them even better united. Bela Kuns communist movement 1920 just scared the shit out of all political alliances in Europe, meanwhile Romanian Kingdom was directly integrated into Great Britan by royalty bloodline. In short all our neighbors outright hated the Hungarians well before Trianon. Hungarians were great fighters the economy was strong and the territory has strategic significance. When they saw that these is a chance of forming a communist Hungary they decided to break it up no matter what but the commie threat must stop. The romanian queen played well, Juguslavia, Czechslovakia was supported by the West. The got a nick name Little Entente (3 weak friends are better than 1 strong enemy) Trianon was a tragedy for the hungarians, true. But it was also a new beginning for many other nations around Hungary. In the end the one who is biased and lacks situational awareness fails. Since King Matthias's death hungarians are struggling with their own identity (its not a wonder we are biased to the bone regarding religion, language and bloodline origines), also the many failed revolutions and lost wars didn't help either. Actually the Hungarian history is a constant repetition of failed rebellions and lost wars since the early 1700s. Today hungarian moral can be described with one single word. 'apathy' We are number one is alcohol consumption, drugs, porn, smoking and also suicide. Our nobel price winner were outright chased away from the country (we have many of them, but they were mostly jews, you know, they had no chance but to flee the holocaust) and it pretty disturbing to say that hungarians even today blame everything on Trianon, meanwhile we are EU members since 2004 and also NATO members since 1999. Just have a look at the current hungarian leadership they fight the EU and veto NATO everywhere they can. Hungarians are a collectively traumatized nation and the very essence of hungarian identity is victimhood. As my great granspa said, if you want to break an alliance or a union the only thing you must do is to let the hungarians join it 😅 We are the Bastards of Europe.

[@herberthasenstab845]

Szóval mint írod a kisebbségek használhatták nyelvüket és élhették a kultúrájukat, ezét meg akartak szabadulni a magyar elnyomás alól. Nem tünik fel az ellentmondás?

[@ClifffSVK]

@@herberthasenstab845 You're trying to cram 900 years into a single argument. Don't you see your own ignorance? 😁

[@balazskiss985]

not hungary, its magyar kingdom not huge, but major kingdom

[@balazskiss985]

about Batu khan in hungarian magyar: bátyókám= my elder brother, uncle

[@cucurucu753]

What are you trying to do here: stir hostility between countries? Hungary was big only because they conquered other territories by force and that horrible thing was undone now. For example the hungarians conquered Transylvania but they never managed to become a majority there!

[@balintkovacs4089]

That's how all the big countries get big, yes. Conquest.

[@CocoSon-we2rg]

@@balintkovacs4089 Then why are you crying for Transylvania? It was recaptured.So do Slovakia and Croatia.

[@dominikvarga9886]

Go back to Albania! Dog romani shepherd! 😂

[@Syrenia1552]

There was no violence of any kind. Archaeogenetic research increasingly suggests Hun-Avar-Hungarian continuity. The Szeklers are the descendants of the Huns. Do you know when the Huns ruled here?

[@romanhvizdak7051]

Hungarians demanding autonomy for hungarians speaking minorities, meanwhile they oppresed minorities in their Kingdom. How ironic

[@user-xz9xi7wo4i]

this is not true, austria-hungary was the most modern liberalist country in europe, we gave many rights to the nationalities, in middle ages there was no nationalism or national idenity in such form like in nowadays, there was empires and kingdoms dont mix this with modern history. The truth is that after trianon the little antane supressed us cus they feared our revenge, fun fact the newly formed Csehslovakia the slovaks was in minority in their own state XDD

[@thombaz]

The first minority rights law ever in the whole world was made by Hungary in 1849. You can look up how "modern" west countries behaved with their minorities and how Hungary did it. How ironic...

[@romanhvizdak7051]

@@user-xz9xi7wo4i 1. We were Czechoslovaks, not czechs and slovaks. 2. Magyiarization, Although the 1868 Hungarian Nationalities Law guaranteed legal equality to all citizens, including in language use, in this period practically only Hungarian was used in administrative, judicial, and higher educational contexts.

[@romanhvizdak7051]

@ Although the 1868 Hungarian Nationalities Law guaranteed legal equality to all citizens, including in language use, in this period practically only Hungarian was used in administrative, judicial, and higher educational contexts.

[@thombaz]

@ And before that only Latin was the official language for 800+ years. We opressed ourselves, lol. What is your point? Playing the victim of evil Hungarians?

[@radu4281]

Long live Trianon !

[@danplesa4151]

Falsoooooo….!!!!

[@Optimistic7718]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3qymGinqrBpkNEsi=JR1cRlwQ6O5VZQ2D

[@Optimistic7718]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i3qymGinqrBpkNEsi=JR1cRlwQ6O5VZQ2D

[@bognarattila5115]

Thank you your video uploading! - Thanks to the Trianon peace decree and the Little Entente, which were supported by France and other Western European countries, Hungarophobia spread throughout the Balkans, and the treatment of Hungarian minorities as second-class citizens and their assimilation into the population of the majority countries created after Trianon is still accepted in many nations. they disregard human rights. - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Hungarian_sentiment

[@RaduRadonys]

Good.

[@katalinkozak9869]

My hometown in todays Romania, is one of the oldest cities of Hungary established by the Saint King Ladislaus ( sir Lancelots model figure) in XII called Varad ( Oradea today). In 1920 the city had a full majority of Hungarian speaking population over 90% and served as one of the major cultural center in Hungary when it has been attached to Romania. Hungarian was immediately prohibited, schools turned to Romanian, all cultural centers as the theatre closed. Many people , among them my great grandparents who owned shops and houses in the city center had their homes confiscated, pushed to the outskirts of the city that later became the ghetto. In 1945-46 the shops were taken too by the communists, my great uncle was forced with a Kalashnikov on his had to work as butcher 12-14 hours a day, without a slice of meat provided for his family, same applied to my grand ma in her bakery. If caught to take a loaf of bread meant prison, so did my aunt end up in prison, you stole from the Romanian nation. We lost even what we had prior the house in the ghetto to take her out. In the late 60’s, the forced urbanisation began that enabled the max influx of non hungarian population by demolishing whole neighbourhoods predominantly Hungarian to soviet style block of flats districts. Many historic buildings and a cemetery of 300 years have been destroyed completely. This time we were lucky as our family home was saved just by luck in 89, the demolishment was planned to 90. During a timeframe of 20 years, a population of over 100k Of non Transylvanian romanians have been moved systematically to the city. Unwillingly the city that was one of the intellectual hotspot had its culture ruined by people who had nothing to do with our culture or norms we lived in Transylvania for centuries regardless all ethnicities. From the 70% our population shrank to 30% by 1990, and to a bit over 20% today. We do not hold of grudge on the people moving in , they are innocent on the matter, but it is clear our cultural heritage, history and human rights were raped and destroyed systematically! And this happened to all major cities of the Transylvania and Banat. Today, we try to cooperate as much as we can to save what has left from tge built heritage, but our history is cancelled, and our culture and existence is still unwanted. There is an ongoing effort to not even mention our existence in the city and region despite having 100s of influencers paid to visit for advertising and the international media cooperates. This is why Trianon cuts so deep to every Hungarian. The truth needs to be told and accepted, so that we can make a brighter future! Greetings from beautiful Nagyvárad/ Oradea/ Grosswardein!

[@CocoSon-we2rg]

It is easiest to look in the neighbor's yard to criticize him. First of all, it was the Soviet policy that imposed these measures, after which the Romanians suffered the most. Don't forget that Bela Khun joined her first. Secondly, I have not seen a Romanian who was indignant that the majority of Swabians became Hungarians thanks to those policies of uniformity in Hungary. Thirdly, Bucharest has the same Hungarian population as a city in Hungary, but the Romanians don't complain that it ruined their demographic composition, people move where they think is best. You were just talking about ghettos indignantly, it brings hypocrisy.