Faces of Earth - Shaping the Planet

[@brucefreedman3655]

This is one of the best and informative videos on tectonic plate movement on earth. I’m especially keen on the current activity in Africa’s Rift Valley.

[@MaximRedin]

I was searching such a video. Thank you for filming this. I like geology though . Btw I am watching you from Russia.

[@Ellsing123]

For thos who apasionantes for science; this very qualitatives video; call contributes. Apraciate this.

[@barbg]

From my very lifelong and so-active coastal Californian perspective: Wow! Thank you for your perspective!

[@PlayNowWorkLater]

Love this modelling! This should be used as an educational tool in schools!

[@intanbaharuddin2703]

❤very educational of our moving Earth😊 thank you.

[@mindymoto1]

We need more documentaries like this.

[@Margaretm-g3l]

I also woke up to this was thrilled to find it thank you for making this film

[@md.shahadathossain5456]

Wonderful documentary to visualize the moving plates and their collision with each other as well as rifting apart from one another. Beautifully scripted, narrated and organized. Thumbs up for all the effort behind this masterpiece.

[@cheerybellerellegue8309]

Hello and good day. . can we use contents of your videos for educational purposes? thank u and more power.

[@MoneyBagAluza]

Pretty sure you can

[@cheerybellerellegue8309]

@@MoneyBagAluza thank you so much!

[@MoneyBagAluza]

@@cheerybellerellegue8309 no problem

[@Ushamba]

Watched without ads!!! 👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👏👏👏👏 Thanks American Geosciences for this magnificent video. Loved it!!!

[@vladislavholmes4852]

I badly wish to do MSc once or if it is called again .

[@cptcosmo]

During the silicone subduction experiment computer vector analysis video at 22:09 did any of you notice that the subducting plate creates a rotor vortex? That motion of circularly moving through a hot cold loop is essentially the process that is used to refine hydrocarbons out of crude oil in "crackers" That could the the very process that drives the natural production of abiotic crude oil. Carbon and water are drawn in with the subducting plate, heated to the cracking point, rising, cooling, and condensing into longer chain molecules...

[@ReallyReall]

Wait what? Ha just joking great commemt

[@kimberlyperrotis8962]

I did notice, the rotational movement at that point is new to me, but it explains a lot of what we see in outcrops where I live, a former subduction zone.

[@mikesahle1193]

Thank you great video I see it left with wonder! Fascinating too keep smiling with lol politely & safely

[@شذىهشام-ن6ط]

Thank you for this!

[@jonathankerr4859]

Isn’t the San Andreas fault not the same? When that spilts off will it not be a separate plate?

[@onecomms4737]

Finally, a show that states much of what I have been saying since I was in grade school. Thank you!

[@deathmerchant8662]

Idiot this is common knowledge you did not say a dam thing that wasn't said millions of times before you. Dont even try to act like you knew anything first. You are a piece of garbage for even trying.

[@gayeinggs5179]

Well if this happened in a few days. How do we know that it won’t carry on quickly ?

[@JonathanCulpepper]

A great introduction to geology and it's processes. However, it's light on the more complex issues. Would love to see an episode dedicated to magmatic fractionation!

[@michaelkaiser4674]

could you guys do a doc on the USA and the Great Reo Grande Rift

[@JulieReizner]

Used in my geology courses at Northern Kentucky University. Thank you!! 2 min: East African Rift Valley 11 min: Pangea, formation of Mediterranean 18 min: really neato convergent plate boundaries models 23 min: tectonic hazards in Greece 30 min: volcano prediction 34 min: Himalayan tomography 39 min: San Andreas Fault, California, earthquake mitigation

[@gtbkts]

Julie Reizner ty for the comment. I thought it was done when the screen went black

[@ronusa1976]

quakewatch.net/

[@gtbkts]

Ronald Hayek ty, I will definitely check this out.

[@StarNumbers]

Did you tell your class the moving stuff is all CGI? If not, you are not a scientist and cannot continue with this stuff at the University.

[@seedplanter7173]

Have you figured out why planes flight patterns don't match a globe Earth ? But match a flat Earth?

[@edwinariviere7309]

Do one about the Caribbean...Possible volcanic eruptions and tectonic movement. I live on an island with 9 active volcanoes...I think

[@rockyofusa1]

The more advances made in sensing equipment the more they can detect - it doesn't mean more quakes...FYI Every earthquake starts with P waves, the S waves is the settling to the new pressure caused by p waves

[@ronusa1976]

quakewatch.net/

[@memethingz6004]

“In ur life time North America and Africa will be about 6 feet further apart than they were when you were born” woah

[@TheStonedBearGaming]

I fell asleep and woke up with this on my screen I don't know how I got here

[@DjWoke]

Me 2

[@Ahavameanslove24]

Fondling KZbin lol it be like that sometimes.

[@deanwa8581]

OMG the same thing just happened to me!! I am serious!

[@allendetshuma8108]

Me too damn

[@KennyMcCormick99]

Lmao me also!

[@deanfirnatine7814]

At about 11:00 it shows the horn breaking off Africa but the East African rift continues South through the chain of Africa's "great lakes" all the way to Lake Malawi so theoretically the split should continue South and be a much bigger land mass than the illustration shows that splits off than just the horn

[@kruelunusual6242]

the mountain building model was very interesting but the subduction model not so much. It looks good but is that what's really going on??? I don't know!

[@gagarinone]

Please check out the others great educational and inspiring videos here at KZbin regarding that. We don't have answers yet for many of the questions.

[@1OldWriter]

@@gagarinone And that wasn't one of the better educational videos.

[@bma1955alimarber]

Wonderful and inspiring

[@TheClearwall]

I keep waiting for this narrator to tell us that we are "approaching the scary door"

[@rendorwilliams9116]

Outstanding computer graphics !!

[@Redlioness-gp9ci]

How old is Earth again? All I know is that Earth is alive and continually evolving. Earth is cracking up under pressure because it keeps giving birth, creating more prominent features and many new lands. They call Earth's model role, mother nature, she continues to be proactive, changing lands as men forge strongholds out of her.

[@jcarlsonfin8103]

The Earth will repair itself and survive, long after humans destroy each other.

[@kristinehayes4885]

It's 4.5 billion years old.

[@sivil_shanessmooth_tooth2977]

Could have sworn they were looking at the moon at one point...lol

[@lisadiantonio7312]

If Mars and Earth collided, would it be called Marth?

[@bobkilmer697]

Mirth

[@dixiem5062]

Ears. Lol

[@Ezrabastian]

it wouldn't be called anything because nobody will be alive to name it.

[@dylanbain4485]

I think Plate Techtonics is older than 40 years, even accounting for initial viewing of this show in "2005".

[@dylanbain4485]

So call me crazy but the main point of this documentary is that climate changes over time. The "climate change crisis" seems insignificant compared to the past history of the earth.

[@firatsanliturk]

I will witness that event from Afar... :))

[@kennethhoopaugh8375]

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

[@Tundra.v]

Me to I came from Addis Ababa

[@ijustpostedth1s724]

Ohhh. I see what you did there.

[@waynegabler6570]

The error in the model at the 22:00 mark is the subduction zone for the Pacific Rift is 3500km to the east rather than as soon as it is under the continental crust. The 'oceanic crust' is dragged along the bottom of the existing crust that far before what is left is meets the westward outflow from the Atlantic Rift some 3500km further east. The line from Hudson Bay to the GOM is above a subduction zone so the crust dips due to the suction the descending magma has on the land above. The only mystery is how long this will be ignored as the factor that drives climate change just by the speed slowing down or speeding up. The Pacific Blob is a sign that the movement is faster to some degree. Neal Adam's expanding earth vid is the basic model for how the earth works these days, as well as the last 200M years.

[@alexburke1899]

There’s an issue with your theory in that a flat slab subduction falls off after a while and detaches, and there’s previous slabs that subducted prior. So where do those plates go in your theory? I’d stick with real scientific evidence and avoid the expanding earth garbage:)

[@woolyhighlander7280]

Why do we NOT hear anything more about Yellowstone activity ?

[@ronusa1976]

quakewatch.net/ volcanoes.usgs.gov/volcanoes/yellowstone/monitoring_map.html

[@robertwagner7439]

I'm out near here it's ok. Some people got in trouble for going off the Boardwalk to stand by a thermal feature. They got a fine.

[@kimberlyperrotis8962]

Great series, but the periods of black screen are too long, thanks.

[@Olistream]

La verdad es que la tierra es preciosa , no tiene parangon !

[@ToniHunterOne]

If our seismologists her in The States, are participating with the data collections at Cern?

[@computeu]

Great job. Visuals make an impression on my memory as well. Thank you. 😎👍🏻

[@tmeservey2723]

I see the flat earth religious lemmings have shown up. Don’t click on his link unless you want to hear a sad, ignorant man talk about how he doesn’t understand anything so he’s going to rely on a book that justifies rape, slavery, and murder. #ChristianityIsADeathCult

[@systemsrenegade9888]

I don't know if this belongs here but a question has always plagued me if Australia is supposed to be on the bottom of the world then why are all the continents moving north towards the top of the world wouldn't they be moving to the bottom of the world. Maybe someone can explain if it's gravity that's doing it and how due to that fact that the continents would have to have negative attraction to be pulled north.I know it may Be a dumb question but it has plagued me for a long time.

[@mybackhurts7020]

7:30 😆I remember holding a boom box like that back in the 80s!

[@bircruz555]

Visit the desert. Take a lot of batteries.

[@Fossilsunleashed]

did they or did they not only drill down 7 miles before the drills melted is that a fact then 7 miles down would be lava or close to it

[@shockwave5544]

9:21 thats new level of hands shaking

[@okboomer6201]

Good video, but the music is kind of gay and annoying.

[@MauriatOttolink]

I don't know how accessible these subduction zones are but do they offer an opportunity to dispose of atomic waste, after use in nuclear generators?

[@rosewhite---]

put it all inside your head to spark some sense?

[@MauriatOttolink]

@@rosewhite--- Ah.. I see they've already made a successful start on you!

[@tupahutuokoneiswife3972]

33:00 brilliant

[@tupahutuokoneiswife3972]

45:00 hmm

[@kennethhoopaugh8375]

Sounds like some Super Mario shit 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@Jemar_Deshun_Blount-Golden]

Wow! 😮

[@dusty2774]

SO...if the weight of all Pangaea was on one side of the Earth, what kept the planet from flopping around simular to an unevenly loaded washing machine does????

[@tripleblackbeltninja]

the absence of gravity and atmosphere

[@silversilk8438]

@@tripleblackbeltninja What do you mean "the absence of gravity and atmosphere"? How could there be no "gravity" (aka pulling force) at any point in history?

[@whuzzzup]

What makes you think it did not? Yes how plates are distributed affects the rotation of earth. For example earthquakes regularly affect the length of a day.

[@johnratcliffe6438]

That was a good watch, thanks :)

[@mariamendoncs6788]

Explain clouds behind the sun?

[@mariamendoncs6788]

Simply shows getting struck down

[@michaelkaiser4674]

cool vids and vibs,nice

[@marklim1390]

Nice.. Very educational, especially to young geology majors.. Thanks..

[@Noises]

This is high school level at best.

[@johnhandy9256]

Yeah if you're into science fiction fool the is earth flat douchebag!! Nobody with your feet above thier heads you dummy. Water always lays level fact. It's called sea level stupid Nobody spinning a thousand miles an hour on a ball with water clinging to it like Klingons and no space cuz it's fake!!!

[@federberer3681]

So what about freaken inner earth???

[@federberer3681]

@Flat Earth Socialist then this video sucks

[@xochitlhernandez4439]

Are the Afaris wearing crock? 9:14

[@xochitlhernandez4439]

crocks?

[@hrthrhs]

@@xochitlhernandez4439 did you just ask yourself a question?

[@awatchmanonawall6188]

yes sure looks like it

[@bobbystanley8580]

Said they got paid to guard the equipment

[@bircruz555]

They are plastic shoes produced locally, and they have been produced for decades. Crocks appeared only a decade or two ago.

[@janicedodson1018]

Don't miss Dr Egon Spengler at 31:50.

[@TheCoolestGamer20]

“Who’s the singing at your wedding? It’s Calculon, Calculooon, Calculoooooooooon”

[@highwaltage]

so how much c02 does plate tectonics release?

[@PAULLONDEN]

Such fascinating science......wish I had taken geography as a study.... what can be more interesting and valid than this evolving planet...

[@Baner496]

Geography was boring at school. But after finishing school. Geography, history, astronomy... Im obsessed with it. Xd

[@dewiz9596]

“Physical Geology” is what you would want to study. This stuff was still not part of the curriculum when I studied Geology in the early 1960s.

[@Sciguy95]

@Martin G answers in genesis is one biggest bullshit organizations on the planet they literally post a statement of faith saying that they refuse to accept anything that doesnt match what they already believe, that is the exact opposite of the way science and progress works. If everybody thought like that we still believe things like lightning being caused by angry gods and that solar eclipses are a dragon trying to eat the sun.

[@punker4Real]

20:14 i can see that anytime I want its only a few miles away from me

[@s1mp1nqqk3nn9]

punker4Real same

[@NephilimFree]

A mountain is a mass of materials which has been uplifted from the lithosphere of the Earth. All mountains possess deformed strata. The Earth's mountains were produced by the process of Orogeny [1] which caused uplift. The horizontal movement of continental plates produced tremendous internal pressure and resistance against adjacent continental plates. This pressure has caused mountains to uplift at the Orogeny belt (edge of the plate) and also farther inland. A common feature of mountains is that they posses many deformed sedimentary strata which have concreted into solid rock. The existence of folded and bent (deformed) strata, particularly those of mountains, discredits the uniformitatian explanation of mountain building because rock will not bend unless subjected to extreme confining (overburden) pressure and/or at high temperature. [2] Cold rock is brittle and will not bent, but will instead break. [2] Because mountains possess deformed strata, mountain building by uniformitarian process would require the materials to have been deep inside the Earth where the confining pressure (overburden pressure) in all directions could be great enough to prevent the material from fracturing and becoming pulverized. If the material were not deep in the Earth, there would be a lack of confining pressure above it, and it would move in the direction of the least confining pressure, which would be upwards towards the Earth's surface. Increasing temperature will increase ductility of rock, but temperatures great enough to significantly improve ductility (300-600C) are at depths of kilometers below the Earth's surface. [2] In actuality, mountain building by uniformitarian process would require that the materials of which the mountain is comprised, including it's sedimentary strata, to have been pushed deep into the earth and subsequently covered with deep overburden which would be great enough to temporarily prevent uplift under great pressure. It's strata could then become deformed by heat and confining pressure. Once the strata had become deformed, the overburden would then have to be removed to allow uplift unless we are to expect the Earth's mountains to be as high above the Earth's surface as the depth of overburden necessary for deformation. At that time, the mountain could then become a feature of the Earth's surface by uplift. This scenario is so implausible as to be considered utterly absurd for a number of reasons, most obviously because the uplift necessary to position them at the surface of the Earth and above it would reduce the mountain to a pile of crushed rock. Also, there would be no continuity of strata between the mountain and the land which surrounds it unless vast areas of the surface of the Earth were also subjected to the same process which created the mountain. Stated simply, mountains built by uniformitarian process do not exist. The obvious explanation for mountain formation with deformed strata is that pressure was applied to recently deposited, sedimentary strata mixed with solid rock which were still moist, soft, and plastic. This pressure forced the materials upward while horizontal movement caused their folding. After their formation, gravity drew the water downward and out of the materials to pool below the newly formed mountain. The removal of water allowed the materials to concrete into solid rock. The existence of folded strata, particularly those of mountains, provides astonishing evidence that the mountains of the earth and their folded strata were created by rapid continental movement during the Noaich Flood. This evidence discredits the uniformitarian idea that mountains are millions of years old and formed over a period of millions of years. 1. Orogeny "[4]."Teaching Structural Geology in the 21st Century, SERC, Carelton College. 2. Deformation of Rock "[5]."Stephen A. Nelson, Tulane University, 29 September 2015.

[@rosewhite---]

Hi Nephilimfree. You are almost right but not quite. Russian and German deep drilling found superheated water just 5 miles down in fractured granite. Every mining video of any mineral clearly shows the mines run through rock that is totally fractured rock in all directions. Miners of all minerals except coal and iron have to search for and then dig down veins of quartz. This applies in gold, silver, platinum, tin, copper, diamonds etc. Coal and iron are found in great layers because they were formed by The Flood. On my local beach I can find granite rocks shot through with veins of quartz with mended cracks that are offset - showing the rock healed itelf over time. I have seen rock folded into a loop in a road cutting in Scotalnd and one day I'll go again and take a pix of it. Uniformitarians always claim a mysterious sources deposited the great layers of sediments on their beloved tectonics. They have the idea continents are not anchored but can somehow float about and climb on each other despite Newtonian Fizziks 3rd Law saying that a plate #1 like Africa weighing trillions of trillions of tons would need a push of trillions of trillions from another plate #2 just to move up to another plate #3 and of course plate #3 would need to have a further plate #4 behind it to resist the push of plates #1 and #2. The silly idea that this climbing about is what is causing the Ring of Fire is nonsense as those fires are burning in the supercritical water - not needing oxygen as the water disassociates into hydrogen for fuel, and oxygen that sustains the fires as they burn the dinosaurs, humans, fish and vegetation sucked into the emptied voids under the crust where the flood waters erupted from. The fire's heat raises steam pressure just like a singing kettle until eventually the pressure is sufficient to blow off the previous cone or plug when there is an eruption until pressure has dropped and the fires die down. This is why volcanoes give off masses of steam and methane. Methane can only come from organic matter? The idea that volcaanoes are vents for magma to rise is nonsense as magma must by definition be free of methane and be unable to rise against the overburden but of course it is claimed to rise up cracks in the crust. Simple calculations of volume wil show that any such source of magma would lose pressure as it rises and expands. Calculate how much a one square yard area of an inner sphere - core, mantel or whatever - would have to expand to at the surface. The Condit Dam removal video shows exactly how deep soft sediments wlil flow away en masse as a stream washes away the sediment mass downstream. Al round the world the landscape has great level plateaus or mesas with deeply rilled and gullied sides leading down to wide flat valleys filled with barren sand. The plateaus were flood sediments levelled during the 221 days of falling and standing water on Earth. Then during the draining days the soft sediments mostly washed away with isolated plateaus of various sizes remaining to be gullied as their water dried out. Darwin's research actually proved Earth is young and The Flood was real but he was blocked from realising it due to his having become atheist aka Satanist and concocting his fairy tale.

[@NephilimFree]

@@rosewhite--- You didn't say anything that discredited anything I said in my post. What I posted is scientifically correct. From my files, a little info to help you see: A mountain is a mass of materials which has been uplifted from the lithosphere of the Earth. All mountains possess deformed strata. The Earth's mountains were produced by the process of Orogeny which caused uplift. The horizontal movement of continental plates produced tremendous internal pressure and resistance against adjacent continental plates. This pressure has caused mountains to uplift at the Orogeny belt (edge of the plate) and also farther inland. A common feature of mountains is that they posses many deformed sedimentary strata which have concreted into solid rock. The existence of folded and bent (deformed) strata, particularly those of mountains, discredits the uniformitatian explanation of mountain building because rock will not bend unless subjected to extreme confining (overburden) pressure and/or at high temperature. Cold rock is brittle and will not bent, but will instead break. Because mountains possess deformed strata, mountain building by uniformitarian process would require the materials to have been deep inside the Earth where the confining pressure (overburden pressure) in all directions could be great enough to prevent the material from fracturing and becoming pulverized. If the material were not deep in the Earth, there would be a lack of confining pressure above it, and it would move in the direction of the least confining pressure, which would be upwards towards the Earth's surface. Increasing temperature will increase ductility of rock, but temperatures great enough to significantly improve ductility (300-600C) are at depths of kilometers below the Earth's surface.[9] In actuality, mountain building by uniformitarian process would require that the materials of which the mountain is comprised, including it's sedimentary strata, to have been pushed deep into the earth and subsequently covered with deep overburden which would be great enough to temporarily prevent uplift under great pressure. It's strata could then become deformed by heat and confining pressure. Once the strata had become deformed, the overburden would then have to be removed to allow uplift unless we are to expect the Earth's mountains to be as high above the Earth's surface as the depth of overburden necessary for deformation. At that time, the mountain could then become a feature of the Earth's surface by uplift. This scenario is so implausible as to be considered utterly absurd for a number of reasons, most obviously because the uplift necessary to position them at the surface of the Earth and above it would reduce the mountain to a pile of crushed rock. Also, there would be no continuity of strata between the mountain and the land which surrounds it unless vast areas of the surface of the Earth were also subjected to the same process which created the mountain. Stated simply, mountains built by uniformitarian process do not exist. The obvious explanation for mountain formation with deformed strata is that pressure was applied to recently deposited, sedimentary strata mixed with solid rock which were still moist, soft, and plastic. This pressure forced the materials upward while horizontal movement caused their folding. After their formation, gravity drew the water downward and out of the materials to pool below the newly formed mountain. The removal of water allowed the materials to concrete into solid rock. The existence of folded strata, particularly those of mountains, provides astonishing evidence that the mountains of the earth and their folded strata were created by rapid continental movement during the Noaich Flood. This evidence discredits the uniformitarian idea that mountains are millions of years old and formed over a period of millions of years. Evolutionists often appeal to the Theory of Isostasy applied to crust of the continents to explain the geomorphology of the earth being formed over millions of years and production of new land mass - that pushing down on one area of the continent causes another to rise by equal force. large.stanford.edu/courses/2007/ph210/pan2/ CHAPTER 10: Folds, Faults and Rock Deformation, What Determines Whether a Rock Bends or Breaks? "When an external force is applied to buried rocks under low confining pressure, such as near the surface of the earth, the rock typically deform by simple fracturing. This is known as brittle deformation. At higher confining pressures, a similarly directed external force will cause the deeply buried rock to actually flow and deform without fracturing. This is known as ductile deformation and the rock is said to behave plastically. Rocks under low confining pressures near the earth’s surface therefore generally deform through fracturing and faulting. Rocks deep within the crust under high confining pressures deform by folding." - University of Houston www.uh.edu/~geos6g/1330/struct.html "ductile deformation: Deeper than 10-20 km the enormous lithostatic stress makes it nearly impossible to produce a fracture (crack - with space between masses of rock) but the high temperature makes rock softer, less brittle, more malleable. Rock undergoes plastic deformation when a differential stress is applied that is stronger than its yield strength. It flows. This occurs in the lower continental crust and in the mantle" - Stress and Strain - Rock Deformation www.columbia.edu/~vjd1/stress-strain_basic.htm

[@101mossie]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 idiots. The bible is fiction fucktards, time to grow up.

[@Teddy_Graham]

Can you imagine how many continents that are lost to time over trillions of years of shifting? Can we begin to talk about when these modern day land masses reached above sea level? Can you imagine how many species are lost to time in the shift?

[@MosinShooter109]

I didn't know this channel existed. I'm pretty stoked.

[@gabiponte7594]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/gIvJdpyfgLmHmNk

[@BlackRose-tc9ig]

33:20 No one: Jazz Musicians: Fuck yeah thats some funky shit

[@lisadiantonio7312]

7:20 Me at 2:00am after eating Taco Bell with the boys

[@Chinggis42]

looool

[@geegnosis8888]

My GCE Advanced Level Geography teacher introduced me to the 'new' theory of Plate Tectonics in 1972. It fascinated me as much then as now. Miss Taylor was ahead of her time and a brilliant teacher.

[@maumbu]

We love you Miss. Taylor!

[@mariamendoncs6788]

Explain clouds behind the sun..

[@g_rammstein]

explain your stupidity

[@darkojovanovic6643]

@@g_rammstein 😂

[@overseastravel6654]

@Giorgos Gkanidis @Dark Jovanovic I don't think that name-calling is the right reply to Maria. It seems that you're assuming something about Maria's question and mocking her for it. There actually *is* a *photographic* phenomenon in which the characteristics of sensors and films *can* make it appear as if things are behind the sun or moon. I refer you to this explanation: www.metabunk.org/threads/explained-why-clouds-appear-behind-the-sun-and-moon.7084/ I realize there are plenty of snarky people out there who throw out questions like challenges, but it doesn't seem to me that we have to assume that Maria is one of them. How about just answering her question? I'm not even up for mocking people who clearly ARE throwing out question to challenge things like the reality of the Apollo program. ("Explain how we got through the Van Allen Belt" ... the answer, of course, being ... "at high speed and wearing dosimeters to make sure astronauts didn't receive dangerous doses of radiation; and they didn't.") We're not going to win anyone over to rationality by being nasty. But again: I'm not saying that Maria needs to be won over to rationality. She may genuinely have been asking about an effect that can appear in photos.

[@darkojovanovic6643]

@@overseastravel6654 its just funny in a way I got it, in a way that maria thinks that all video is real and not animated, and that she is thinking of conspiracy behing it. is it realy not obvious that this is just animation, not real capture. and than mr giorgos with such a comment...bahahahajahaha. anyhow thanks for the briefing and deeper view. such a humor is apriciated in my town. sorry for miss understanding. god bless you and maria and brother giorgios.

[@duanewillis7058]

Shitty eyesight on your part?

[@ken440]

(35 minute area). "Normal tectonic movement 1ft per decade", OK. But "India fast tracked that and sped up the indian ocean at 29ft per century." Sounds really fast.. but wait a minute, thats almost 30 ft a century right? divided by 10 to get the decade, thats 3 ft per decade. So at 29ft per century its not quite three times faster. so much for that incredible speed. Verbal sleight of hand. Why didnt they say 3 ft per decade? because it doesn't sound so fast . The 29 bit made it sound real good.

[@gabiponte7594]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/gIvJdpyfgLmHmNk

[@ken440]

@@gabiponte7594 interesting eh? suggested reading "Tragedy and Hope" by Prof Carrol Quigley. you wont find the book but it is findable as a pdf online.

[@nelsonvisconti222]

They never went more then 8 miles in the esrth

[@scobra6652]

You got some clumsy fingers there, Skippy.

[@zGJungle]

I wonder how much this rift will lower ocean levels around the world when it gets to it's lowest point ?

[@ajhproductions2347]

Why does this video constantly appear in my recommended. I had to see what the fuss is about.

[@tornadomash00]

did you fissure it out yet

[@dawnsites4232]

It is all about frequencies.

[@TWOCOWS1]

Francesca's model (at the end of the film) is totally wrong. Oceanic crust is LIGHTER not heavier than the viscous mantle below, simply because it is basalt and basalt contains water. it would NEVER sink into the mantle just on its own. it is PUSHED under from behind by the new crust being built and pushed up by the heat of the earth in the mid ocean ridges..... Good God, just because she is a woman and a foreigner, then she must be given the podium and declared to be right, although the idea is manifestly ludicrous?

[@whuzzzup]

Well you have to keep in mind that during the subduction process the density of oceanic crust increases by various processes (water getting removed, metamorphic processes, ...). The model gives a nice representation of backarcs I think.

[@TWOCOWS1]

@@whuzzzup Still, that does not make the oceanic crust heavier than the mantel below it.

[@robertferreiro3466]

Thank you....

[@rorychristyhazelraimy6552]

Its kinda great to see but i think its not boring for me ^-^

[@andreweueugene1640]

hey said jerry was somewhere else, thx

[@andreweueugene1640]

hey said jerry was somewhere else, thx

[@unnikrishnannairkrishnannair.]

Gases released at site and temperature change show it

[@e.sanchez9908]

For those who says is bored why did you watch it in the first place. AND THE SAY IS BORED BECAUSE THEY DON'T LIKE NATURE

[@kgavyn]

Yeah, fuck this Sanchez guy.

[@cameronriley2068]

Gavyn Krupinski lol school work hard haha

[@thomask940]

This is YOUR world....learn how to take care of it people. These videos show us what Mother Earth is made of. What if one day we could harness her seismic energy released? How many kilowatts of energy is produced in a single 2.0 tremor? Answer: a lot.

[@franbenson5805]

So what... you sap

[@kathyhuestis7878]

No , they don't like hearing the truth and about how things have been hidden from us for a lot of years. Heads in the sand. Unfortunately, I would rather know so we can be prepared. I have lived in the Pacific northwest my hole life around three Mt,s.

[@tarynmichelleart]

what is the place besides Iceland?

[@jolujo5842]

Taryn Michelle Ummm...that'd be the Atlantic Ocean. LOL

[@markblix6880]

Ethiopia

[@fukcoffdood2515]

The remains of these buildings can still be found in Greece today. Funny thing they can be found in every Big City on every continent and even some small cities

[@paulfrewzy7374]

Aye the world's Round...

[@kathyhuestis7878]

Even in the ocean, Mt Rainer, Mt Adams and Mt St Helen's, are all around me. You never know what or where you are going to find things.

[@alienal8278]

I'm thinking there is a subduction zone under the southwest point of Puerto Rico 🇵🇷

[@Blessings.429]

I love the fact you show all the movement, but nobody ever shows what has happened over the millennia. What’s up with that 😭😩

[@gabiponte7594]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/qKG3hpuKeauGapI

[@fieldadmiralspartanryseb-8293]

Why so many people thumbs down a nature documentary? Strange

[@ROBMCKISSOCK]

Great video, imagine the day when geologist finally include an understanding of planetary electrical discharge and electromagnetism & plasma into their profession. That will be a great day for humanity because then all the holes in the current theory will be filled.

[@michaelpatrickswope2617]

Good Luck With That

[@freemind..]

Robert Yeahright - Any model without water at its center is doomed to fail.

[@willieevans6586]

Very nice video I love it I just have one question why every time do you show water on video is level and every time you show it in a simulation it's curved I'm able to get my head around it no matter what because it's actually what happens but it seems like you guys are building the globe when all the videos you show is level water in the background

[@sherimatukonis6016]

Video and photographs aren't far enough away to capture the curvature of the earth. You can see it (barely) from an airplane though.

[@joyleenpoortier7496]

That was amazing thank you

[@kuyajer_]

5:23 was that a camel????

[@floydy8359]

Poseidon District Gaming yes

[@guntherultraboltnovacrunch5248]

You have to have balls to get into an old soviet era helicpter... In Africa. 2:19

[@willconnor5858]

You're right, there. I took a ride in an Mi-24 once. Thing shook like a leaf the whole journey from Point A to Point B.

[@richardpotter6313]

Yeah, choppers and Somalians don't mix. 🤣

[@bircruz555]

@@richardpotter6313 Did you watch the video?

[@colleenann772]

I was worried they wouldn’t return and leave em in the dessert. Scary job

[@SensationAwesome]

Math is not my specialty so can someone help me out with what they mean at 4:15 where he says "the amount of magma that oozed in and formed this new crust in the middle of these two tectonic plates was over 88,000 cubic feet; enough to fill a football stadium 2,000 times over"?? I mean I'm getting a football stadium 44 cubic ft large or, "about one-and-three-fourths times as big as a hot tub." so I don't know what, but I guess I'm doing something wrong! haha

[@marclinquist5558]

Part 1 I found it far too important to not stop and comment on this subject. And more specifically, an opportunity to express an opinion as to the true and accurate description of the mechanism involved. It’s interesting when you consider how much the standard model is dependent on the mantle having a convection regime. The great Arthur Holmes is credited to its acceptance in geology and the suggestion it could be the missing energy source to drive the tectonic plates. But, he also readily admitted it could be wrong. To date there is no direct observable evidence of the mantle having an up welling of lower density material resembling a convective cell or even a conveyor belt type of mantle movement beneath the tectonic plates. The standard model is only speculative in these regards. But even more importantly, the surface observations over the years have continually presented evidence of a mechanism of plate movement far different than what convection could provide. The mantle appears instead to be a solid state material that is 2,900 km thick, with pressures so great that at only 100 to 250 kilometers carbon can be squeezed into a diamond matrix. There are now a growing number of researchers who are skeptical of the standard model’s over-dependence on such an overly simplistic idea. Prof. Don L. Anderson of the Caltech seismological lab., had with many other geologists made critical assessment of the standard model. authors.library.caltech.edu/25038/122/Chapter%201.%20Origin%20and%20early%20history.pdf New Theory of the Earth Anderson, Don L. (2007) New Theory of the Earth. Cambridge University Press , New York. ISBN 9780521849593. @t "Because of the combined effects of temperature and pressure on physical properties, shallow stratification may be reversible - leading to plate tectonics - while deep dense layers may be trapped at depth." "Conventional (Rayleigh- Benard) convection theory may have little to do with plate tectonics." Convection is so poorly defined that it is difficult to consider it even a viable working hypothesis unless there is some direct observable evidence that it can make anything resembling a prediction of observation. Carlo Doglioni, the geophysicist and former president of the Italian Geological Society, and since April 2016, the president of the National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology has published some very remarkable papers in regard to mantle dynamics and plate tectonics. www.dst.uniro...antle_Dynamics_ MANTLE DYNAMICS AND PLATE KINEMATICS Carlo Doglioni, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy Roberto Sabadini, University of Milan, Italy ". . . . . none of the proposed models of mantle convection can account for the simpler pattern in plate motion we observe at the surface, nor has a unique solution been proposed for how material in the mantle convects. At the moment there is no way to link mantle dynamics and plate kinematics at the surface, considering that the mantle and lithosphere are detached. The Atlantic and Indian ridges are in fact moving apart with respect to Africa, proving not to be fixed both relative to each other and relative to any fixed point in the mantle. This evidence confirms that ocean ridges are decoupled from the underlying mantle." This remarkable observation above expresses the reality of the situation. Geologists need convection to be a viable solution to plate movement, but after 90 years, its existence, let alone its functionality, remains unanswered in the standard model. www.electroplatetectonics.com/

[@freemind..]

Marc Lindquist - Mantle convection does seem to be just a way to plug one of many holes in an unproven, though almost universally accepted, theory. Something else that doesn't seem to match observed reality is the idea that the interior temperature of the Earth is unbelievably hot. The evidence they use seems circumstantial at best. Please let me know what I'm missing here... One supposed proof of the Earth's inner heat is the fact that mines get hotter with depth because of increased proximity to a presumably magmatic heat source. By that logic, we should also see oceans and deep cave systems getting hotter with depth.. but they actually get colder. Lava from volcanoes is used as supporting evidence, with the assumption being that it originates in the mantle.. therefore the mantle must be full of such material. But studies appear to show that lava is more likely generated locally deep in the crust beneath the point of expulsion due to frictional heat from ground movement caused by earthquakes. There are several more, but you get the idea. The heat is a NEED for the geophysicists because without it there is nothing to power the convection, uplift, subduction, earthquakes, volcanoes, etc... But what if it's NOT HOT inside? What if the fluid in the interior isn't magma? I realize that the entirety of the natural sciences is built around the idea of a magmaplanet Earth.. but there just doesn't seem to be irrefutable evidence for it. I'm bothered by this idea but I can't shake it. I find a great many things to be questionable as one idea is cobbled together with others to form the greater narrative.

[@davidwaynechoate8059]

You were prepared for the Trolls when they reply "where's your sources?". They do that to Me often. Like I'm going to write a fuckin' peer review article in someone's comment box.

[@drakedorosh9332]

When I was a kid the text book said the mantle was made of "plasma". The gist of it was that something very energetic and exotic must be countering the pressure of the material above. I think it confused people so they made up something that dulled people's curiosity. Iron Nickel core fixed magnet? Convection? You can't teach kids anything that resembles "perpetual motion" but if the mantle is plasma then wouldn't at least the electrons trace a path? What about motion like a Faraday motor? Plasma was too much. They just dumbed it down to the three states of matter for which they could find teachers to teach. It stuck.

[@davidwaynechoate8059]

At least there is one safe assumption ; the continents fit together just like a jigsaw puzzle , and must have been one piece in the past. That's a good bit of Luck . Most every other Theory must begin with an almost complete subjective opinion. I think a lot of the Scientist that get their name pinned to a Theory are worried posterity will not quote them correctly in the context that it is a Theory.They were smart.

[@davidwaynechoate8059]

@@drakedorosh9332 That is most of the problem. No one understands the most important thing They must to make sense of all sciences. Electricity. Plasma is misused as a term for anything electro - magnetic. They must start to Require a thorough education in Electrical Engineering to Freshman of all sciences.

[@mikekretmar]

And core systems in the atmosphere which are different and density and different in the electrical charge once they make a connection and a transfer energy they begin to sink they sink to Earth and you can see land mass that are not indigenous to Earth if you know what you're looking at

[@g_rammstein]

ok

[@mikekretmar]

@@g_rammstein just saying,Kings queens and the elite you think they'd believe in tectonic plates, hell no we were colored in education they were learned

[@danylbarbour7030]

It's interesting to note That 1000 years ago Greek mythology Talked about Falling off the face of the earth And Moving rocks My point being Perhaps there's some truth to the mythology Were buying their actually testifying about The giant falls that occurred by the refilling of this ocean

[@sternamc919sterna3]

The fall of civilizations happened probably in consequence of increased seismic and vulcanic activity and consequent periods of climatic instability. They cause disruption of life cycles. There is a proposal for all this being caused by changes in solar activity. We will be the witnesses of 0.0000000000000...00001 seconds of Terra's history 😉

[@williamhoskins7818]

What is the problem with the, dead air ,

[@MediaHubPTA]

How often do you have to repeat subliminal messages? Apparently every 5 minutes. Few million here, few billion there, these people are so full of it

[@markwalker3499]

There is a third rift zone that is studied on land, the Rio Grande Rift in the USA.

[@bazingaburg8264]

That narrator was amazing in Futurama

[@beybslifeintheus494]

Great vedio earth my friend

[@qmydee1481]

Great job! Thank you

[@EnyListiyarni]

Faces of eart wonderful dokumentery lands scape 🎉

[@gregoryphillips2939]

Love this.

[@michaelalleyn6261]

I think science is missing the obvious conection of techtonic shift and global warming...... Think of the globe as a water ballon. With hundreds of millions of tons of ice on the caps the planet has a given shape. Remove that ice and internal pressures constantly push outward on the lightening polar caps reshaping our planet. For the poles to move out the plates must shift as the center inevitably narrows. These shifts cause earthquakes amd volcanos. We must remember the planet is not a rigid sphere. There is always a reaction when something changes.

[@noneofyourbusines9976]

Only two places where a spreading ridge can be studied on land? Really? The Northern Most spreading centers of the East Pacific Rise appear on land in North West Mexico (Cerro Prieto Volcanoes) and in the Imperial Valley California (Salton Butte Volcanoes).

[@isaacfrias8761]

how would you no millions years ago you weren't there

[@JB-1138]

Jesus was there. He said so in the old testament.

[@leahford8582]

Apparently this is your very first documentary google it before you make a comment you have no understanding of do your homework before you ask questions that show your ignorance

[@Noises]

Ask your mom/homeschool teacher the difference between know and no.

[@a-square4085]

It's called science. And it's great that you are watching & hopefully learning. But arguing based on a false assumption doesn't do any good. What you should ask is "How can you know these things without actually being there when they happened?" That is a question, not an argument. And it can be answered.

[@mitchelputman538]

No means Know . Lol

[@JESSICA26ize]

Wow music to an earthquake I would never have thought but it's crazy seemingly ingrained n us like the music gives u the same anxious feeling with a rise n fall of the music n the same calming feeling from the low slower music would us that can't b a coincidence am I RITE. Grate stuff guys I ALWAYS love to lurn a lil more everyday excpesialy bout our beautiful planet❗❗❗👍🤠👍