INCREDIBLE Facts About Human DNA

[@rwinestock]

28 min mark. Sadly, about 90% of peer-review writings where economic interests are involved are tainted. This comes from my own personal readings and my very well-trusted cardiac and former neuro research friend working three-plus decades in a highly respected health facility in Texas. Dr. Jeanson, you know your particular field well and so your comments are accurate to that point. I wish it were not true, but we have come to that for some time now. Health delivery is highly compromised due to editor inputs to get drugs passed the review process. All are winners, but the patients.

[@lindsey4178]

I just want to clarify what you are saying. Are you saying that Dr. Jeansons basic information is correct but when it comes to the value of peer review, that part is unreliable? We all know how important peer review is to come to well thought out conclusions, for sure, because one person can't possibly come up with every possible variable. You are saying that the peer reviews available here are mostly from people who have an economic "stake" in the truth of it or not? I'm sorry, I read your comment three or four times and wasn't sure I was understanding correctly. Lol. If that is your point, I absolutely agree that we cannot allow all research to go the way of pharmaceutical research. It's horribly flawed and definitely corrupt. It reminds me of soap companies (for example) who say they have the number one best product but their studies were all payed for. Perhaps Dr. Jeanson should try and remedy this but I can imagine it's difficult to get peers in other places to take it seriously. But what are your thoughts on his conclusions alone?

[@lindsey4178]

I'm sorry, perhaps I should have fast forward to the 28 min mark before asking about your comment. Lol. You were commenting on the actual medical research NOT Dr. Jeansons research. I thought about deleting my question but thought it would be better to just correct it. I was making assumptions. 😊 But I'd still like to hear your thoughts on this from someone who has more medical background than I do. I am no expert by any stretch of the imagination. Just a mom trying to understand the big picture in science. Lol

[@rwinestock]

Lindsay, yes I am saying the peer-reviewed process has become very tainted. The researchers are typically not to blame. The editors hired by drug companies/whomever are highly motivated to produce a "favorable" outcome for their product that is often costing $3-5 billion over the course of 10-12 years to get to market before seeing any return on investment. The revenue generated from an approved drug (although this dan be applied to other industries as well) is hedonistic and all parties involved (from government agencies down to companies that hold intellectual property are highly motivated to see it succeed as well. Profits and taxes lubricate our economy, frequently at consumer expense.

[@rwinestock]

@@lindsey4178 Yes.

[@gtw4546]

Not just health delivery that's compromised now. There is also the rush to get published so some researchers resort to "p-hacking" in order to meet the minimum bar to get their paper reviewed.

[@christophesutter1844]

Quel travail phénoménal pour la vérité et la gloire de Dieu🔥💜🔥alléluia

[@John4.23-24]

I'd love to know the biblical time-frame of my genetics., That would be cool.

[@brandongardner7398]

I know right.

[@willlywillly]

I am wondering if the same genetic processes for humans can be applied to animals and plants? I am certain the same research for animals and plants will produce similar results. Great time to be alive. Love science and God's creation!

[@deovolente6326]

Oooo...I enjoyed this info. Sadly, ThePeopleOfTheLie just never give-up!

[@carolynbillington9018]

good science and history

[@imafeltersnatch7634]

It's neither

[@nn-sq2pg]

So, mainstream dna testing (ftdna, 23andme, ...) don't go in-depth, I get that. But what sort of dna-testing would you recommend instead? Would love to get an answer. Love your research.

[@bradleyfore]

Poor guy was *so* wrong about the ethical and rigorousness of modern science a la Covid...

[@Mike-cj3nw]

Dr. Jeanson I was tested by Ancestry

[@angelalong7806]

How do we look at the Rh factor in DNA I have looked everywhere trying to get more information but no one seems to really know why a small part of humanity is Rh negative and what the difference really is

[@Missy-sx9zv]

I think it's part of the losing process he talks about there would be three breaks per generation. Its like a genetic break

[@KevinB-pd3me]

A hockey stock graph is a sure sign that you should be using a logarithmic scale for the y axis!

[@robertadams5437]

You keep saying we don't have the DNA from pre-flood people, but Noah and his sons and their wives and Noah's wife were ALL pre-flood people.

[@MrAgonizomai]

He did actually address that issue.

[@BegodeEx30]

{2 Esdras 5:51} He answered me, and said, Ask a woman that beareth children, and she shall tell thee. 52) Say unto her, Wherefore are unto they whom thou hast now brought forth like those that were before, but less of stature? 53) And she shall answer thee, They that be born in the the strength of youth are of one fashion, and they that are born in the time of age, when the womb faileth, are otherwise. 54) Consider thou therefore also, how that ye are less of stature than those that were before you. 55) And so are they that come after you less than ye, as the creatures which now begin to be old, and have passed over the strength of youth. ^^^It's not that we don't have the same DNA as those before the flood, after all it is written; Eve is the mother of all living. However it's different in that as each generation pass on that DNA it becomes more & more diluted, weaken, corrupted. This is why in the beginning & even for a period of time after the flood till the Law was given brothers & sisters could marry & reproduce without risk of producing deformed babies; their DNA & genetic makeup was much more stronger, less diluted & not as corrupt. Contrary to what evolutionists teach our 1st & earlier ancestors were way more stronger, bigger & lived much longer thus humans aren't evolving, we have devolved & become weaker, have a shorter life span.

[@leedavis3704]

However they are considered post flood people ! So there is that !

[@robertadams5437]

@@leedavis3704 dude, that was 4 months ago. Why are you worried about that now?

[@MrAgonizomai]

@@robertadams5437 You do understand that KZbin videos are there forever unless they are taken down, so someone may come across a video for the first time months, even years, after it was posted? There is no moratorium on comments unless the poster puts one on. If you post a comment, you may get someone replying a very long time after you posted. Nothing you can do about it. Just live with it. If you don't want to go back to it, just don't respond. You've both put in your two-pennyworth.

[@michaelcschmitt]

What about taking into account that people early may have waited until 75 years old to reproduce? Love this series..

[@aurora571000]

That is discussed in an earlier episode

[@wanttopreach]

My grandmother had 14 children, Multiply this out 9 generations and you get 61 Billion. so to get 8 billion in 20 generations you have to have major black pleagues in multiple generations!

[@SD-hs2pk]

min 26 is great!

[@KevinB-pd3me]

For goodness sake, please change those population growth charts to have a logarithmic y-axis. It makes it vastly easier to visually compare exponential datasets when they approximate a straight line rather than a hockey stick!

[@richardbland9079]

Us to Noah on Y Chomosome, then Noah to Adam would be a simular tree. X chomosome would go to Eve, would constrict at the wives of Noah's son and Noah's wife. Would not the hockey stick diadram be a double hockey stick because of flood?

[@59kuphoff]

The fact that humans were created 6000-ish years ago does not necessarily mean the earth is 6000 years old. Gen 1:2 And [then] the earth was without form and void..... I believe from reading Job chapter 9 that it is probable there was a realm of creation before God started over with the creation that our ancestors were a part of. When did God shake the earth and make the sun not shine? It is not unusual to think that the world revolves around our human race; When perhaps we are part of a second round of creation.

[@surrenderdaily333]

Okay so you said that it's sin that made the mutations happen and started the ticks on the clock, so that's why we all look different? I'm not sure I understood you correctly. But if that's what you said or meant, does that mean that if Adam and Eve hadn't sinned we would all be/look identical? Silly question probably, but I was curious. Then I started wondering about our spirits and if they all look the same, lol.

[@gtw4546]

Mutations are ERRORS, but variety is something separate. So the short answer is that variety would have still existed even with perfect copies.

[@patrickk1417]

I like how there needs to be so many videos to try and prove one point. God man made, God was perfect but had imperfections in DNA, DNA made different man

[@JohnGisMe]

Technically, wouldn't the evolutionists be right that Y-Chromosomal Adam would be part of a large population, as he was not the Biblical Adam, but Noah?

[@1badjane493]

Dad : Scottish , Irish , German Mom : Italian ( southern boot)

[@edwardbrown7571]

We have been taught an upside down family tree. We are wrongly taught that we are the singular working back into ever larger populations. But if Adam and Eve are singular, and first, they were not from two of endless billions of connections as we assume in the back of our minds... But as we trace a family tree backward, we are expected to find ever wider populations and connections... When in reality, it is more like an interconnected ball shaped spider wed working out from the center, or a circular whiffle ball like internal redundancy structure with the basic center being singular spreading outwardly... Not spreading out internally... So... As our search goes back, the population of the family tree, there should be a diminishing overall population that is redundantly interconnected and ever more dense coming forward to modern times... A ball of yarn has a single end thread at the center... The outer building on top of the inner past... A beginning point... Rather than a peeled out orange like structure... Still we are told that we have a never ending number of grandparents, when in reality we have a lot of inner marriages of cousins, often distant cousins, and that is considered sinful by modern twisted moralities of manmade rules of religiosities that now do not fit realities...

[@karenblohm3279]

I called myself a creationist in one of these that I listened to out of order. I guess the correct term is Christian.

[@MichelleYee]

Where is the video about the female chromosome and our history?

[@MrAgonizomai]

That’s the MTDNA. The previous episode. Ladies first!

[@djb1164]

🌺🌺🌺

[@qinoqino7643]

Why why why do you have to start at the start over and over ? Continue to tell people to go back to the videos, instead of going back to the start again and again ! Please !

[@heidikendall5742]

Hi Qino, these were posted over a year ago. I’ve just found them and have been binge watching so the recaps annoyed me too, Ive just started fast forwarding thru them, you might want to think about doing that too. God bless you.

[@malindadenlinger882]

Well, actually, I disagree. It’s useful to summarize

[@christianheichel]

Kudt wondering if Noah kept reproducing after the flood

[@randallhatcher6028]

This is interesting kinda . But not so vital in my opinion.

[@keevancrawford6708]

It’s wild to have Ham not black after watching him talk about AABB aabb letter matching. Black people wouldn’t exist with imagery you put up man. Hidden bias is a thing, for real. Same concern I have with AI in the future. I’m not sure you are even aware.

[@Hoojammyflip]

Your comment on vaccine 'science' reliability has come back to bite us! 😁

[@imafeltersnatch7634]

The Human Genome Project has proven all of this incorrect

[@imafeltersnatch7634]

@JDFogle cite how

[@Bluegrassgirl45]

Trying so hard to learn the truth NOT a recapping nor illustrations of the WRONG evolutionary info. I can't learn the truth as I keep seeing the charts of the evolutionary lies.

[@mikefugate1367]

You should do some reseach on what the sumarians recorded, much of the bible comes from them , their writings are much more detailed,and gives a much better explaination of where we came from and there is much evidence to support that path

[@gtw4546]

That sounds like the writing of an "historical novel" where the Sumerians took the framework of history and made up a whole bunch of "details" to flesh it out. Just because something has more details, doesn't mean it's more accurate or that it is the original source.

[@garyfowler2946]

Jehovah's Witnesses teach Gennisis 2:4. The heavens and the earth were created in one day. Day is used to represent a period of time. As " In grandfather's day." The earth is much older than 6000 years.

[@Sola_Scriptura_1.618]

Not according to the science, it is not! Try again!

[@Sola_Scriptura_1.618]

@JDFogle Agreed! Yom (Hebrew: יום) is a Biblical Hebrew word which occurs in the Hebrew Bible. The word means day in both Modern and Biblical Hebrew.

[@leedavis3704]

Who seriously take jehovah witness as anything but nonsense,its a made up religion in the last 100 yrs how can you take that seriously!

[@kikyamart8749]

JWs rewrite the bible to fit their own narrative. I would know, I was raised in it. No one should be looking to them for truth...

[@leedavis3704]

@@kikyamart8749 I agree how do you believe a religion that was invented by people 150 yrs ago to fit an agenda they decided on, not really a God based religion more a cult of control.

[@theunknownfragment5473]

You are trying to do the same. Forcing data to fit your Biblical theory. We have buildings on this Earth older then Biblical creation...

[@freshbakedclips4659]

the same thing as Atheism, forcing data to fit the evolution narrative.

[@trulyso734]

The bible was written inspired of God to the ancient Prophet Moses etc, so yes there would be primarily archeological findings (most underwater due to that great flood of Noah's generation) and some strange looking structures to our eyes today (mainly from ancient worshippers of fallen angel brought deities etc; keyword "fallen" from heaven's glory wrongly worshipped with demonic sexual activitiws and child sacrifice practices galore). Doesnt take away from the Truth of the Bible of God's narration. The God we were made to worship and return to His side if we follow that Truth alone and not steer to the left and right unto pagan/demonic (fallen angel sighting/instruction inspired stuff). So all of that you rightly point out is just proves the bible true. Do open your heart to it at some point I hope. God bless