Most Christians Don’t Know THIS About the Fossil Record

Most Christians don’t know THIS about the fossil record. In this presentation, Kevin Hadsall discusses how the fossil record and rock layers confirm the biblical account of Noah’s ark and flood.
Check out The Genesis Flood Revisited here: AnswersInGenes...
========
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics (Christianity-defending) ministry dedicated to enabling Christians to defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ effectively.
On our KZbin channel, you’ll find answers to your most pressing questions about key issues like creation, evolution, science, the age of the earth, and social issues. We desire to train believers to develop a worldview based on the Bible and expose the bankruptcy of evolutionary ideas and their implications.
You’ll hear from top teachers such as Ken Ham, Martyn Iles, Bryan Osborne, Dr. Georgia Purdom, Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, Dr. Tim Chaffey, Bodie Hodge, Dr. Gabriela Haynes, Dr. Terry Mortenson, and more.
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenes...

[@johns_myth]

At a quick glance, old earth theory made sense to me because of the insinuation that God made Adam as an adult, so perhaps He made an adult Earth. However, the beautiful conclusion to the presentation shows the implications of the theory's logic in undermining the consequences of sin and Christ's death. I have now changed my mind, and with good reason, and with plenty of evidence. "Why does it matter?" is always the question I get when I ask other believers, and I couldn't explain why, but I knew it did. Now I know. Thank you for the presentation.

[@IAMhassentyou]

In Christianity, the Bible is considered the "Word of God," and there is much to find about this topic in scripture. The Bible is called the Word of God, meaning it can be considered a direct line of communication from the Lord, divinely inspired by the authors of the respective books. If the Bible is truly God’s Word, then we should cherish it, study it, obey it, and fully trust it. If the Bible is truly the Word of God, then it is the final authority for all matters of faith, practice, and morality. If the Bible is the Word of God, then to dismiss it is to dismiss God Himself.

[@wingednut2283]

"Is considered" but is it actually?

[@IAMhassentyou]

@@wingednut2283 yes, it is.

[@aalphaandomega3746]

Hi Amen and God bless

[@aalphaandomega3746]

I Love God and his word I Love with all my heart and soul . I Love you too . God is our father , creator , savior , brother and I am his vessel whom knows and feels his Love for me and us all .

[@IAMhassentyou]

@@aalphaandomega3746 hello! God bless you too

[@achildofGod36]

Praise the LORD! God's word is truth! Hallelujah! Proverbs 23:15-16 My son, if your heart is wise, then my heart will be glad indeed;16my inmost being will rejoice when your lips speak what is right. Jesus is coming soon.

[@HisWordisLife4U]

Yay! I am excited for that to happen.

[@marcgottlieb9579]

@@HisWordisLife4U Number one, there are two Elohim gods in Genesis.. They have names..Its good to know who is speaking..Two, he hasn't a clue the time period of the Great Flood that covered the Earth..Three, since Danial was told to close the book until the end of days when knowledge has increased, what have most Christians learned in 2500 years.? Not much due to the facts they don't seek the truth..The entities we call GOD that created the universe isn't in the Bible..The Elohim in Hebrew doesn't mean GOD, it means the powerful ones, the shining ones..Let's go to the Book of Revelation..What is the Dragon? I dare anyone that reads this to tell me the correct answer..What is the Heavenly Beast ? Same offer..The Bible is about ALIENS..

[@HisWordisLife4U]

@@marcgottlieb9579 No one cares who is talking. Evil is evil. Fallen angels are evil. There are no such thing as aliens they are fallen angels and demons. No one cares about your other theories. Buss off.

[@GrugGaming]

@@marcgottlieb9579 There's only 1 God for starters. Whatever else you based that idea off of is just plain garbage bro

[@SteevyJay247]

00:48 there is unknown amount of water on earth, there are under ground river basins that have never been explored. The Bible even mentions water springing up.

[@graciegj63]

That deep hole that was dug in Russia found water in there too.

[@sliglusamelius8578]

There is water under the mantle of the earth that is three times the size of our surface oceans. Northwestern University reported that just a month ago.

[@Gek1177]

@@SteevyJay247 that isn't actually water, is hydroxide ions bonded in mineral compounds, basically rocks.

[@zerosteel0123]

Heard the same! Interesting

[@sliglusamelius8578]

@@Gek1177 I read that Northwestern university just reported on a huge water deposit under the mantle that communicates with the surface oceans.

[@marilynpowell6881]

Amen, thank you for such an interesting and informative video. Its answered a lot of my questions. God bless xxx

[@vicleaken]

That's sad.😢

[@coreybarnwell2621]

Speaking on rapid fossilization, I don't remember all the details, but I'm sure it can be found on Google. There was a deep underground mine that had gotten flooded, I believe, a few decades ago. It was a pretty major tragedy, because quite a few miners had lost their laves in the sudden floods. After just a couple of weeks, when the waters had finally either receded or had gotten pumped out, the mines were being searched to recover the bodies of those lost in the mines. It was discovered that all of the wooden supports beams in the lower parts of the mines were completely fossilized. It absolutely baffled those who had discovered it. It only took roughly two weeks to turn the wooden beams into solid petrified, or permineralized beams

[@stevepierce6467]

Probably not true. We actually know how long it takes for organic material to fossilize, and it is not a few decades.

[@spamm0145]

@@stevepierce6467 As if the presupposed loving evolutionists would accept evidence refuting their much needed deep time paradigm, even soft tissue found in dinosaur fossils did not dent their faith in the greatest genetic engineer in the universe - TIME!

[@coreybarnwell2621]

@@stevepierce6467 there has been evidence to the contrary on multiple occasions, yet those examples are just considered a mysterious anomaly and disregarded, as opposed to factoring that data into their theories, because that would force them to change the narrative. Science is constantly changing, proving previous science to be flawed. Yet, somehow, every new discovery that doesn't completely align with mainstream science receives so much push back and categorically separated from the mainstream theories and just called a, "mystery," instead of being thoroughly investigated and factored into the current date to consider the possibility of new theories

[@davelawson8494]

@@stevepierce6467 Indeed, rapid fossilization is absolute hokum at least in the context represented in this presentation.

[@stevepierce6467]

@@spamm0145 Presupposition is the last thing scientists carry with them into a research project. It is only because many presuppositions (many religious) have finally been cast aside that science can start to formulate an accurate picture of how things really work. Many organic substances can be preserved and even hardened by different physical and chemical forces, but true fossilization takes a long TIME! Sorry, the world really is much older than 6000 years.

[@Kinglaugh451]

My wife would likely love a fossilized flower, since her ADHD keeps many of our plants from being alive.

[@graciegj63]

Lol 😅

[@graciegj63]

Have you tried a cactus?

[@MacehuaAtStonehaven]

😂

[@zerosteel0123]

😂

[@Kinglaugh451]

@@graciegj63 we have not yet.

[@fibbonocchi]

Where are the fossil records of the millions of people who died during the flood?

[@terrymeadows1827]

God bless all of you at Answers in Genesis, I'll be sharing this presentation to my catechumen when we begin our Christian Apologetics unit which verifies the truth of God's Word delivered to us through His appointed prophets, disciples, and apostles.

[@TickedOffPriest]

Unless you understand the fall, you cannot understand Redemption.

[@alantasman8273]

Unless you understand man's sin nature and its result ...you cannot understand the need for a redeemer...that being Jesus the Christ.

[@TickedOffPriest]

@@alantasman8273 AMEN

[@HellNoKamala]

​@@alantasman8273what I like to eat won't begin as a sacrifice.

[@MariaWalker-qo3vi]

@@alantasman8273halleluYAH 🙌. Surprising, coming from a priest. So you’re aware of the genesis 6 debacle? Or is that a bridge too far…?

[@victorvolobuev507]

@@HellNoKamalayour statement only supports the comment you’re responding to.

[@JFootin]

There is no evidence of plant life and erosion within the layers, proving that it was all deposited in a very short period of time.

[@wingednut2283]

What does plant life turn into overtime do you know? Erosion is most definitely in rock layers pressure can make it look less so

[@apoliticalobserver2741]

Your are seriously misinformed. There is ample evidence of erosion between layers of sediment. For example the Temple Butte formation of the Grand Canyon lies between the Redwall and Muav limestones. The Temple Butte has numerous eroded out and infilled paleovalleys and paleochannels. The fossil record of land plants also goes back 425 MY, well before the dinosaurs evolved.

[@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440]

Wow, you are so unbashedly confident about your claims that you didn't even bother fact-checking them. Look up "unconformities in geology". Erosional changes between strata absolutely exist. Fossilised plants also exist. Honestly, creationists are perhaps the most clueless yet conceited Science deniers.

[@vikingskuld]

​@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440why don't you look up fossilized soft tissue protiens and explain how they can last into deep time. People like you are so arrogant it amazes me. You don't know as much as you think.

[@spamm0145]

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 HAHA, yeah, you stick with your matter without minds created all the fine tuning from the micro to the macro, the never observed matter moves toward life, the never observed information pops into existence without the source being a mind. Keep pretending that proteins fold themselves by chance despite odds greater than all the estimated molecules in the entire cosmos. Keep fooling yourself that matter without the ability to 'think' designed your brain that can comprehend abstract concepts despite the fact the molecules building your brain cannot understand them. Science concerning life is funded by people who have already decided evolution and the big bang are true, it is propped up by assumption, presupposition, data biased interpretation, and often fraudulent lies, you think this is science?

[@dennishagans6339]

Atheists have become much more vocal and militant in the last 20 years or so, I think it has to do with pride, they went to college, paid their dues got their degrees and in these last days their pride in these things has really increased. We are promoting the Biblical record and this record comes into direct conflict with their authority as educated degreed scientists, how dare we question them as they are authorities in these fields, this is really what this boils down to, their authority and education is being brough into question. Before we can even get to molecules to man evolution, we need to start with cosmic evolution, the big bang and then the solar nebula theory, in a big bang cosmology, the big bang is said to have only made three elements, Hydrogen, Helium, and a little bit of Lithium, for everything else you need stars to make the rest of the elements. Stars fuse Hydrogen producing Helium, and Helium into Carbon, an so on until Iron, once a star begins to make iron it is that stars death nell, all the rest of the elements after iron are said to be made in super nova explosions. In a big bang paradigm, stars are fundamental for life, as they created the elements needed for life, thus in a big bang paradigm explaining star formation is very important as we need stars to make the elements of life, even the noted scientist Dr. Carl Sagan said "we are star stuff" Fair Use Star Formation Neil DeGrasse Tyson said, "We Know the cloud wants to Collapse under its own weight to make one or more stars. but rotation as well as turbulent motion within the cloud work against that fate, so too does the ordinary gas pressure you learned about in High-school chemistry class, Galactic magnetic fields also fight collapse they penetrate the cloud and latch onto any free-roaming charged particles contained therein restricting the ways in which the cloud will respond to its self-gravity The scary part is that if none of us knew in advance that stars exist, front line research would offer plenty of convincing reasons for why stars could never form." [Neil DeGrasse Tyson, 2007, pg 107] Death by black hole and other cosmic quandaries. New York: w.w. Norton and co. Eva Novotny said, “The process by which an interstellar cloud is concentrated until it is held together gravitationally to become a protostar is not known.” [Eva Novotny. Introduction to Stellar Atmospheres and Interiors, p. 279.] Martin Harwit said, “Literally hundreds of ideas on how stars are formed have been advanced in past decades. However, we are still far from any real solution.” [Martin Harwit, Astronomical Concepts, Second Edition. p.405.] Martin Harwit said, “The universe we see when we look out to its furthest horizons contains a hundred billion galaxies. Each of these galaxies contains another hundred billion stars. That’s 1022 stars all told. The silent embarrassment of modern astrophysics is that we do not know how even a single one of these stars managed to form. There’s no lack of ideas, of course. We just can’t substantiate them.” [Martin Harwit, Book Review in Science, 7 Match 1996, p. 1201-2] Charles J. Lada and Frank H. Shu said, “The origin of stars represents one of the most fundamental unsolved problems of contemporary astrophysics.” [Charles J. Lada and Frank H. Shu. The Formation of Sunllke Stars. Science, 4 May 1990, p. 564.] Ward D Thompson said, “The formation of stars is one of the most fundamental problems in astrophysics... No current model can reproduce all of the observations.” [Ward D Thompson, Isolated Star Formation: From Cloud Formation to Core Collapse, Science 4 January 2002: " Vol. 295. no. 5552, pp. 76 - 81.] V. Trimble and M. Aschwanden, “The formation of galaxies and large-scale structure remains TMIUPIMA. . . "the most important unsolved problem in modern astrophysics.” [V. Trimble and M. Aschwanden, Astrophysics in 2000, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 113:1025-1114, 2001 September] Roger A. Windhotst, as quoted by Corey S. Powell said, “Nobody really understands how star formation proceeds. It’s really remarkable.” [Roger A. Windhotst, as quoted by Corey S. Powell, "A Matter of Timing" Scientif‌ic American, Vol. 267, October 1992, p.30] Having planets for life to form on is also paramount, so explaining their formation is also up there in importance. Fair Use Formation of Planets Martin Harwit said, “Once these planetesimals have been formed, further growth of planets "may" occur through their gravitational accretion into large bodies. Just how that takes place is not understood.” [Martin Harwit. Astrophysical Concepts. p. 553] J. Blum and G. Wurm said, “The formation of planetesimals, the kilometer-sized planetary precursors, is still a puzzling process.” [J. Blum and G. Wurm, The Growth Mechanisms of Macroscopic Bodies in Protoplanetary Disks, Annu. Rev. Astro. Astrophys. 2008. 46:21-56] Jeff Cuzzi said, “How the first stage of this process, primary accretion, works is a fundamental unsolved problem of planetary science.” [Jeff Cuzzi, “Planets: the first movement," Nature 448, 1003 30 August 2007] John Chambers said, "Objects must have grown very rapidly from sub-metre-sized pebbles into 100-km-sized bodies, possibly in a single leap.” [John Chambers, “Planetary science: Archaeology of the asteroid belt," Nature 460. 963-964 20 August 2009] Anders Johansen said, “How this process continues from metre-sized boulders to kilometre-scale planetesimals is a major unsolved problem: boulders are expected to stick together poorly, and to spiral into the protostar in a few hundred orbits owing to a 'headwind' from the slower rotating gas.” [Anders Johansen et at, "Rapid planetesimal formation in turbulent circumstellar disks," Nature Volume 448 1022-1025 30 August 2007] We cannot even get to molecules to man evolution because we have no stars nor planets for evolution to start, no stars no elements for life, no planets no place for life to start. However, the creation model works just fine.

[@richardgregory3684]

_However, the creation model works just fine_ "A magic wizard did it" always works fine if you are willing to belliever in magic wizards.

[@dennishagans6339]

@@richardgregory3684 so we are supposed to believe that evolution did it, when they can't even tell us how stars or planets can form? by the way, they do speculate on some civilizations out there as being 1 million years beyond us, at that level their tech would seem like magic to us and we would have about as much of a clue of their tech as a cave man would be of a modern cell phone. They have speculated about aliens in other universes that have the tech to create universes and maybe even created our universe, Did you ever watch Star Trek? What do you make of the Q continuum? or what about the episode of the one who identified himself as a "dowd" and some of the others they ran into like in TOS episode Arena where a very advance race the Matrons are able to do as they will and there is nothing the Enterprise nor the Gorn ship can do. in our science fiction we have godlike beings able to do things like the Q without the aid of any seeable technology, if you can enjoy it and even muse about it in science fiction then why such an aversion to any reality in this life? The Kardashev scale the original sale went as far as type 3 civilizations, others have expanded it last I saw to level 12.9 In some Kardashev Scale variants, a Type V is merely called "godlike" and is not defined at all, because it would be impossible for humans to imagine what one would actually be like. It could take 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 years to reach this rating!

[@wingednut2283]

Also we can just start with molecules to man. It is all peices to a larger puzzle and to say we do not know yet is okay.

[@stevenwhite8937]

Gas in space does not want to gravitationally collapse. Instead it wants to expand outwards…..

[@dennishagans6339]

@@richardgregory3684 Fair use Neil deGrasse Tyson explains how aliens could be so much smarter than us Neil Degrasse Tyson said, in this hypothesis: "Human is about 97% identical to chimpanzee. Our 3 years old is about as smart as adult chimpanzee. Imagine an alien species that is 3% on the other direction. Their 3 years old children would be smarter than Albert Einstein. “Oh look honey, these human discovered the theory of relativity. How cute, our little Timmy discovered that when he was three.” Why would such species bother contacting us? To them, we are nothing more than chimps on a zoo called Earth. 100,000 years ago, we are still living in savannah of africa. 10000 years ago, most human does not know how to write. 1000 years ago, most human does not know proper scientific methods. 100 years ago, human has just discovered cars, airplane, electricity Imagine what a species that has achieved all the above 4,000,000,000 years ago can do today? (age of Universe is 13,000,000,000)" oooo oooo super intelligent aliens ooo must be wizards

[@profoundgreetingsfromneptune]

Excellent, thorough, faith-supporting presentation delivered with strength and grace.

[@jonathanrussell1140]

And totally vacuous...

[@paparedpill1036]

One question I have and have never gotten a good answer for, is with all the dinosaur fossils where are the fossils of all the humans that died ? Its strange to me that we have so many dinosaur mass graves, but no evidence of all the humans that were killed from the flood.

[@genome616]

There is one answer and one answer that explains it perfectly, the bible is wrong and this so called global flood was probably tales from a local tsunami as we have so much evidence of civilisations that existed before, through and carried on after the flood, yet they did not document any flood, even the fact it is physically impossible to build a ark that size from wood as it goes way beyond the structural integrity that any wood could stand.# The question you also should be asking is why modern mammals and humans are never found in the same layers of rock that dinosaurs were, if they existed together then if begs the question why is there no evidence backing religious claims they did, and while you're at it, ask where all the fresh water animals, fish etc come from if they were wiped out by the salt water, did we have fresh water fish tanks on the ark too with suitable oxygenation pumps and filters? Seems when you dig a little big you just need miracle after miracle for the bible to be true.

[@TonyTERRIBLE-k5w]

as far as i can gather humans back then lived a long time so there would not be many humans we find some that have been found but obvious there were more animals compared to humans

[@genome616]

@@TonyTERRIBLE-k5w maybe the actual answer is the one backed by scientific data and evidence that shows dinosaurs lived millions of yrs before humans ever evolved from our ancestral ape cousins. Yes evolution that has claimed the title of the strongest accepted theory that has the largest pool of evidence from several unrelated fields of science and is both demonstrable in real time and can be proven by the fact we can decode any intact piece of DNA and identify its relation to any other life on this planet and place it on the evolutionary tree.

[@earthisasphere]

@@TonyTERRIBLE-k5w So, they would not have died in the flood? That is your answer? That was the whole point of the flood!

[@tamischroeder6549]

Could it be that these fossils seem to be all from the area of the United States but the human population lived in a different region of the earth? Just a thought. I know I would not have chosen to live in an area populated with giant animals. Same exact reason I will not travel to Australia for example. I am terrified of giant spiders, snakes, and animals that would gladly eat and or just kill me. I prefer living surround by lush green vegetation, where fresh water and rich soil are plentiful and apex predators do not live.

[@patriciaboggs8882]

Awesome Kevin! Your church family is excited to see how God is using you for His kingdom.

[@BornAgain87]

Life cant come from none life

[@JB-yb4wn]

Yes it can, if you can read, try looking up abiogenesis.

[@luish1498]

the abiogenesis view proposes that the first life forms did indeed arise from non-living chemical precursors through natural processes, gradually increasing in complexity over time. This is the predominant scientific perspective, supported by evidence from fields like chemistry, biology, and evolutionary theory. Researchers have proposed various models for how this transition from non-life to life could have occurred, such as the RNA world hypothesis, the iron-sulfur world hypothesis, and others. These explore the potential chemical and environmental conditions that could have enabled the emergence of self-replicating, metabolizing entities.

[@jonathanrussell1140]

And yet here we are 😂😂😂

[@ChristisLord2023]

But none of them work. ​@@luish1498

[@HS-zk5nn]

@@JB-yb4wn yeah I did. scientists still cant do it.

[@IamMarcRash]

This helps strengthen my faith. Thank You brother.

[@stopthethreat]

Look up Walt Browns hydroplate theory. Catastrophic plate techtonics is equivalent to creationists believing in evolution as the mechanism for the formation of life as it is today.

[@Pay-It_Forward]

Praise be to the Greys who created humans from apes by fussing Chromosome (2 & 3). Long live Ambassador "J-Rod'. may Area 51 be his palace forevermore.

[@daftwulli6145]

@@stopthethreat lol the theory of evolution has nothing rtoi do wqith the forming of life, only lying creationists claim it does. Also we can directly observe plate tectonics, they are a fact

[@holidayrap]

, THEY WILL CRUCIFY HIM; and after he is laid in a sepulchre for the space of three days HE SHALL RISE from the dead, WITH HEALING IN HIS WINGS; and ALL those WHO shall BELIEVE on his name SHALL BE SAVED in the kingdom of God. Wherefore, my soul delighteth to prophesy concerning him, for I have seen his day, and my heart doth MAGNIFY HIS HOLY NAME. #BelieveinChrist #Jesuslives! #Jesusloves!

[@TJforChrist]

God bless you AIG !!! Stick with the authority of the word of God

[@markduell2468]

What if the Bible is wrong?

[@TJforChrist]

@@markduell2468 what if you're wrong? If I'm wrong I wasted my life. If you're wrong you wasted eternity and your life.

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

@@TJforChrist What if Hindus are right? You would have wasted your life, eternity *AND* misinformed people while alive literally slowing down humanity's advancement.

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

@@TJforChrist What if Hindus are right? You will have wasted eternity, your life as well as slowing down humanity's advancement.

[@jonathanrussell1140]

When god said the rainbow is his promise that he will never flood the earth again, he lied.

[@paultharp4626]

Thankful for the work this ministry is doing

[@avafury4584]

Amen ✝️

[@jonathanrussell1140]

Spreading lies

[@SkepticalGodlessAussieGlober]

If "ministry" means breeding science denial, spreading lies and misinformation, making the gullible more ignorant then sure, they're doing a bang up job.

[@johnglad5]

​@@jonathanrussell1140You are in my prayers. You are an eternal being made in God's image.

[@jonathanrussell1140]

​​@@johnglad5there is no evidence to support your statement. But we're doing this elsewhere, I've just realised, so no need to reply here. I'll think for you.

[@alecj3454]

Great lecture Mr Hadsall. Thank you.

[@jonathanrussell1140]

The Aeronautical Engineer demonstrates his expert ignorance of Evolution. Marvellous work.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

God bless you AIG 😊🙏✝️🕊️ thank you for all you do. You are a blessing to us

[@georgewade9748]

to connect more with July 4 ...just watched a movie about GW ...attaching the Hessian ...crossing the Delaware with his rag tag army...half of which had enlistments ending in a couple of weeks

[@mgadams4850]

Please AIG or ICR, make these pop-up ads not erase the comments or reply buffer. I was in an explanation that was rather detailed, as a reply. A pop-up, I skipped popped up and cleared all my work. Please send this back to youtube to stop this censorship.

[@jaymiller9254]

No. Reality is the flood.

[@wingednut2283]

Said no educated person ever

[@zerosteel0123]

​@@wingednut2283 there are plenty of educated Christians. Including Christians who are YEC.

[@Gek1177]

​@@zerosteel0123plenty, maybe, but statistically speaking creationists are the least educated religious demographic in the West. And the "experts" either never publish any work in their field or they publish work that has nothing to do with YEC.

[@CENTURION737]

Just like the religion of evolution is nothing more than SpongeBob imagination

[@Gek1177]

@@zerosteel0123 statistically not that many though.

[@lazerathhome]

In the Rocky Mountains of Alberta/British Columbia we have rock boundary layers that make S Curves and Switch Back Zig-Zags! Which back up what he claims around the 28:00 Minute mark of the Video Until the 30:36 minute of the Video. So Far this video does an excellent Job of Explaining exactly what I've seen in the Rock Layers I've seen with my own Eyes, Videos and Pictures. The ONLY thing so far that I am still on the fence about is the Age of the Earth. My understanding of the Scriptures is that each of the Days of creation may not be a 24 hour day and could be much longer or certain days of creation may be 24 hours OR a Mix of the two. There were scriptural reasons why I came to that conclusion but I no longer remember why (Old age and my memory isn't quite as sharp). I think part of it has to do with the scripture where it says something about a thousand days being like or the same as a Day for God. Darn it I wish I could remember. I am NOT claiming I am right or wrong either, its just a Conclusion I had come too when I had done a deep dive into this subject. I do know it has to with the Very Beginning of Creations and some part of the 7 days of Creation. I will research it again after I finish this fantastic video! So I do believe its possible the actual Age of the earth could be roughly 6 or 7 thousand years old. BUT I also believe its possible the Earth is Older then 6 or 7 Thousand years. I wasn't there and while scripture does allow us to track back in time through genealogy back to Adam and Eve there was something before Adams Creation that led me to this conclusion. I distinctly remember coming across something that led me to believe there is a possible passage of time greater then a single 24 hour day. I will try to remember and post it in a reply or simply edit this comment if/when I do remember. I truly enjoy learning and have no problem changing my opinions if I am shown verifiable evidence that I can fact check and verify myself (to the best of my abilities anyhow). I'm Halfway through the Video so far and I am thoroughly enjoying it! Thank you so much for the Video. I look forward to debating this with my non-believing friends. Godbless your Work!

[@kurt120032002]

For me things are much, much easier. I was in a bad place, I had 2 important events in my life and I asked for help. Not only everything worked out just fine, but the strange way that everything went convinced me it was not just fate or luck. It was not the only example in my life but was the undeniable one. I don't care about official religion, bible and so on. I got my personal understanding of God, based on my own experience and if I am to say one thing I learned about God, is that everything needs to be with love.

[@knarftrakiul3881]

Jesus told His deciples " For you have seen and believe, but blessed are those who have not seen yet still believe. " Bible makes it very clear that it's all about faith. "We walk by faith and not by sight" We are not supposed to want to see vision or proof.

[@Herrlorddonkoenigczar]

Exactly! Amen

[@stevepierce6467]

But now we live in a world where evidence is available. You reject evidence only and exclusively in your religious life. In all other aspects, you require, even demand, evidence, like when being tried for a crime you are accused of, or buying a house or a microwave.

[@sherijobe9754]

You can also mention the little grand canyon here in Ga. and how quickly it formed.

[@mrscience1409]

Not really a canyon. It is a gully, only 150 ft deep and we know the source of its formation. Look up the Fish River Canyon in Africa. You guys are always arguing about the Grand Canyon like its the only canyon in the world. The Fish River Canyon's formation began 650 million year ago.

[@gtdetan]

@@mrscience1409 Wow! 6 whole million years! And you know this how?

[@globalcoupledances]

@oluwadetanidowu533 - isotopes

[@gtdetan]

@@globalcoupledances Terribly unreliable. Can also be contaminated by older or new substances. We can run everywhere deny or dismiss the possible existence of God, but at the end of the day, we have to admit that there is INTELLIGENT design in the universe. None of this could possibly have come into being because of some big "boom".

[@jamesnewman8011]

​@@gtdetan It is called evidence. It is called actually studying something to figure out how it came to be instead of taking someone's word for it. It is called honest investigation instead of dishonestly cherry picking data to fit a preconceived narrative. See... Science actually cares about finding the truth about things. When a scientist gets an answer that doesn't fit, other scientists will come along and call it out as fallacious, and a new answer will be sought through thorough experimentation. It isn't even one area of science that determines the age of canyons. It is multiple fields of study completely independently verifying the ages. Noah's flood is a myth. It is actually a retelling of other flood myths that came before the Noah story. Not only is there scientific evidence that shows the world didn't flood 4k year ago, but there are records from civilizations that exist through that time frame that were not wiped out by a flood. There is a lot more evidence against the creation story than there is against the Noah story so AIG is just dishonestly cherry picking data to force fit it into the Bible, but it falls apart under any honest degree of investigation.

[@SomeGuyNamedRoy]

I was also told "there's no such thing as dinosaurs because they aren't mentioned in the Bible." That was church for me 25 years ago.

[@somethingtojenga]

Isn't it incredible how stupid people are?

[@sspicer549]

Love this. Thanks for your work! From Virginia.

[@davidboyer2290]

I came to the idea of a rapid disruption of Pangea when looking at underwater contours. Atlantic looks ripped apart quickly then slowed down for the mid-Atlantic Ridge to form. Pacific looks like a crumple zone on a car after impact. So maybe Pangea (one super continent, low hills at most)... The Ark (animals able to walk to Noah)... Earth ripped apart (tsunami flood) Tectonic mountain creation and mid Atlantic Ridge formation... Tectonic motion is rapid then slowed over time(migration of animals to "origin continents")... Look to the underwater contours and see if things don't match.

[@jonathanrussell1140]

You've heard of the Heat Problem, right?

[@davidboyer2290]

@@jonathanrussell1140 The faster than normal radioactive decay heat problem or another one?

[@fergusonhr]

Be careful what you say or you will get BURNED...​@@jonathanrussell1140

[@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440]

Ah, that's such a wonderful idea! I wonder why you haven't published it in an actual scientific paper...

[@solipsist3949]

Ask a geologist. They're the authorities and are happy to explain. If you want to know stuff, just take the right classes. It's not brain surgery, but it takes a bit more than wild guesswork on Google Earth.

[@bethvonbuchwald1023]

Thank you for clear explanation of scientific issues. My one question - would there also be human fossils?

[@globalcoupledances]

Wikipedia "List of human evolution fossils"

[@creationmission7907]

Search "Where are all the human fossils" on the Answers in Genesis website and you will find several articles on that topic

[@alphabeta1337]

Creation is fact, Evolution is myth

[@ThomasClementsRVA]

Agreed 💯💯💯

[@all_bets_on_Ganesh]

A say it in capitals. It will be even more true.

[@DixieDee]

Amen. Sadly, many of these "fools" (as the bible even calls them) won't know this until Judgment Day, when ALL Truth is revealed. Oh well. It's THEIR soul. If they want to play "russian roulette" with it, that's on them!

[@billcook4768]

Do you realize the world can be created and that evolution is true?

[@rebekahorst]

@@billcook4768as in since the creation have living things evolved? Absolutely. Where creationists and evolutionists differ is about the very beginning and where we came from. We know that since God created everything, over time many plants and animals and even people have evolved. We just didn’t come from another species or anything and we never had tails, lol.

[@nickwilkin9845]

This is fantastic. Nice work, easy to understand and well put together presentation. Thank you and God bless you, as this does fill some gaps for me. Awesome.

[@samburns3329]

Nice work, easy to understand and well put together, and *completely wrong.*

[@splinewalker214]

When the water bursted forth from the ground it’s talking about the springs all around the worlds started shooting water up out of them over flowing.

[@tone9358]

I find it interesting when a YEC takes a verse as allegorical instead of literal. Why are you so firm on other parts of the Bible are literal when you’re willing understand that other verses aren’t being literal? Especially when a literal interpretation clashes with what we understand about reality?

[@eriolduterion8855]

I grew up on a farm that had an artesian well. We understood that the water pressure of the ground water and elevation slope was the cause. This lasted until in its infinite wisdom, the city allowed two farms to be sold for housing developments, removing a good bit of the top soil, adding 50 or so additional wells and septic tanks; and suddenly, there was no more artesian water. Ten years later, City decided to annex the area, and add another development - resulting in NO well water and forcing the city to install water and sewage piping as well as storm drains, as paving prevented the former water absorbing surfaces from doing so, and thus replenishing the ground water, resulting in periodic flooding.

[@holidayrap]

Angels speak by the power of the Holy Ghost; wherefore, they speak the words of Christ. Wherefore, I said unto you, FEAST UPON THE WORDS OF CHRIST; for behold, the words of Christ will tell you all things what ye should do.

[@bigpounder311]

Brilliant! Awesome can’t wait to hear you in person!

[@thevulture5750]

Romans 1:20

[@farcovidiu3110]

@@thevulture5750 Yes, brother, people have no excuse, even if they were told evolution at all levels, even If they are bombarded with arguments from other evolutionists. We may try to tell them the thruth, through such videos and other means, and I am amazed by so much opposition ( maybe I shouldn' t), but at the end, they will not have any excuse because they saw clearly what is around them. God have mercy on them!

[@thevulture5750]

@@farcovidiu3110 have you seen how the KJV Bible has a mathematical structure?

[@farcovidiu3110]

@@thevulture5750 I did not think about that until now

[@shellygee137]

​@@thevulture5750 Please explain how the Buble has a mathematical structure and your source. I'm very interested!

[@mathete9968]

​@@thevulture5750What are you talking about ? It was the product of 47 scholars in 6 committees. Not a bad result but by no means a perfect translation.

[@TearDownThisWall]

The Fossil Record - powerful evidence of a world wide flood.

[@itsamystery5279]

We have geologic evidence of thousands of local flood and thousands of sediment depositions by oceans and seas over the last 500 million years. We have zero evidence all the sediments found on the Earth were all deposited at the same time by the same event only 4400 years ago.

[@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440]

The fossil record: a misrepresented and deceptively portrayed record that actually articulates how millions of years shaped the Earth and its organisms.

[@epicofgilgamesh9964]

😂 No, no it's not.

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

The Fossil Record - powerful evidence of evolution. Not ever did it support a hilarious worldwide flood of fairy tales. Stop trying to shove your religious beliefs into science.

[@TearDownThisWall]

@@Creationism-is-pseudoscience Please point out where I mentioned religion. I'll wait.... And while you're at it, point out your evidence that a world wide flood is a fairy tale, made up for children's imaginations and entertainment. I'll wait for that too.....

[@jackwatts8089]

I stumbled into this video. Praise God. I can understand this.❤

[@globalcoupledances]

Then there is no hope for you

[@wanttopreach]

We have info from cultures that show that Mars was located between earth and where Venus now exixsts. Venus, being a rogue planet came into the solar ststem and hit Mars. This colision knocked Venus into a orbit with retrograde spinning. It placed Venus just inside the goldilocks zone but created such friction that the borught about the known green house run away we see today. It knocked a large chunk off Mars and knocked it to its current position. On the way it passed by earth dumping most of the Mars water on earth. From here on your presentation is correct and happened as you are presenting it in this series. check the r4est i=of the posts!

[@michelfraenkel4920]

Sheep

[@renejacques8288]

As a Christian, I have a hard time listening to anyone who thinks the Earth is only 6,000 years old when the bible tells us the Earth was already here before the 6-day creation started but was covered with water; isn't it what the bible says clearly?

[@Jade-3000]

Do you mean - when it says the earth was without form, void, and darkness was on the face of the deep? I guess you could interpret that as meaning there was an earth that was formless, I always thought it meant that the matter to form an earth like planet was there but lacked form and an atmosphere 🤷🏽‍♀️

[@renejacques8288]

@@Jade-3000 I was referring to verses 6-9 where on day 2 God made a separation between the waters. Well, where did the water come from? God didn't create water on day one. The waters were there already. God had created the waters in the beginning when He Created Heaven and Earth. At this point Earth is still under water according to verse 9 where God said "Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear". Again where did the dry land come from. It was there already before the 6-day creation obviously God just commanded it to appear during the 6-day creation. Does that make sense?

[@thehtehteotheithe]

@@renejacques8288 "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth" there you go, that's where the land and the water came from. God created the physical universe, time, space, matter and all that fun stuff, THEN the spirit of God was hovering over the surface of the waters, THEN He spruced the universe up over the following six days.

[@renejacques8288]

@@thehtehteotheithe So you're telling me God created the universe in the beginning, THEN He spruced up the universe over the following 6 days? Do you realize that you're saying God did not create the Earth in the 6-day creation, that Earth was already here. All God did was spruced it up as you said?

[@thehtehteotheithe]

@@renejacques8288 look Genesis 1. What does it say, and in what order? IN THE BEGINNING(at the start of the creating) God created the heavens and the earth. He proceeded to add and seperate light and dark, day and night, land and sea, so on and so forth('sprucing up') This in no way invalidates a six-day creation. God makes the barebones of the physical universe, Moses has something he can comprehend and thus makes a note of it(genesis was written by Moses, presumably after a vision or series of visions), and God proceeds to make light and dark, and that was the first day. Fits quite well, wouldn't you admit? are you saying The Bible contradicts itself, that God contradicted Himself?

[@passionfly1]

Mr. Hadsall asking the question "where is the erosion?" is so key to understanding this. This is an extremely important question. Geologists are always talking about the deposition while dismissing the natural processes of erosion on this vast swaths of layering. This is so important!

[@jonathanrussell1140]

As all of this is bs, who cares? The actual answer is "the erosion is at the very top of the previous layer". How are you supposed to be able to detect what has been eroded away anyway?

[@jonathanrussell1140]

The erosion is the bit that is no longer there.... You're welcome

[@jamescohn4268]

Beautiful how GOD closed the door of the Ark, and JESUS says HE stands at the door knocking and whoever lets HIM in…..

[@somethingtojenga]

......so couldn't he just let himself in?

[@surrenderdaily333]

The recent (in the last couple of years) findings of more water below the earth's crust than what we even have in our oceans today is a testament to the fact that there was and is plenty of water to cover even the tallest mountain today.

[@garyseven2308]

I love how scientists state the temperature of the Earth 120,000 years ago, when there were no temperature measuring devices 120,000 years ago. ;)

[@luish1498]

How do we know the temperature 120000 years ago? For the pre historical record measurements of natural thermometer records are used. These natural thermometers include ice cores, tree rings, speleothems, lake sediments, ocean sediments and so on.

[@mixmaster00myke]

​@luish1498 what are your thoughts on the accuracy of carbon dating

[@TJforChrist]

​@@luish1498 in other words, you guess

[@markduell2468]

@@mixmaster00myke Carbon dating isn't used when dating the age of the earth.

[@lawrencegreen8952]

Yes, there were ways to measure the temperature. Do the work and find out how, lazy brain.

[@VincentConard]

I get so weary of Christian apologists who do NOT hold to young earth creationism. There are too many otherwise well-educated Christian scholars who feel they MUST adhere to the “science” that the creation is millions/billions of years old. Thank you for THIS clear presentation. My prayer is that Christians who mock YEC will reconsider and repent. Continued blessings to you and your ministry.

[@Th69571]

The Earth is billions of years old.

[@richardgregory3684]

Yeah no doubt you'd have been one of the Inquisition who voted to convict Galileo for the heretical idea that the earth goes around the sun, not the other way around.

[@globalcoupledances]

Galileo has shown that the Bible is not accurate

[@Gek1177]

@@VincentConard the problem with AiG apologists is they'd rather lje about science than just admit they believe in a miracle.

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

You are weary of intellectually honest christians who are capable of accepting facts and fitting them around their religious beliefs?

[@joaniemcguire1856]

Praise God from whom all blessings flow. Praise Him all creatures here below. Praise Him above ye heavenly hosts. Praise Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. In Jesus' Name Amen. Thanks for this amazing video. God bless you and your sweet family and all who helped you.

[@avafury4584]

Amen 🙏🏿💗✝️

[@zerosteel0123]

The flood is the best explanation by far. That's when God ripped apart the continents.

[@Th69571]

The flood as described by the bible didn't happen. There was a flood but not as grand as the one in the book.

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

It's not. It's the fantasy you really want to be true, despite any logical thinking tearing it apart in seconds.

[@jonathanrussell1140]

8 different scientific disciplines say you're wrong. Check out Aron Ra's series of 8 videos on this. Yes, that's right, Aron Ra

[@zerosteel0123]

@@Th69571 not according to God's word and it is HIS word that we will trust in.

[@zerosteel0123]

@@Creationism-is-pseudoscience the only fantasy here is the idea that there is no God and He cannot do what is deemed to be possible by mere men.

[@GeraldAlpinePerry]

Another consideration is if millions of years was spent making fossils all over the earth, there should be millions of years of humanity within the same remains. We have found a few, but some of the people didn't survive the flood and human population only expanded in the last century. The Earth is most likely younger than most people think.

[@richardgregory3684]

_Another consideration is if millions of years was spent making fossils all over the earth, there should be millions of years of humanity within the same remains_ No, because humans - homo sapiens - is not millions of years old. Moreover, for most our our known evolutionary history, our numbers were very small, and geographically limitted. Which is why human fosisls are very rare. And made even rarer by humans engaging in burial rituals. Even the earliest humans did not tend to leave dead peopel wherever they died.

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

What are you even talking about? Lol please elaborate on this millions of years of humans if millions of years of animals.....b does not equal a. So I'm genuinely curious.

[@burnttoast2790]

The problem with that line of thought is thinking that our species has actually been around for that long. We haven't. Anatomically-modern _Homo sapiens_ have only existed for 300,000 years, and _H. sapiens_ in general not much longer. Humans as a specific evolutionary lineage, ie. genus _Homo,_ have been around for a little under 3 million years. Everything beyond that has been human ancestors that don't actually qualify as humans (whether that be other hominids, primates, mammals, synapsids, tetrapods, vertebrates, animals, eukaryotes, or cellular life).

[@globalcoupledances]

For me the first human was the brother/sister of the first chimp 7 million years ago. So that includes Sahelanthropus, Orrorin, Ardipithecus, Australopithecus. Confirmed by YEC Robert Carter and Don Batten with their claim of 60-100 mutations per generation

[@jamesnewman8011]

It is best to not try to use science to explain the flood... Science wins with evidence and honesty.

[@lindah.4743]

Love this! God is amazing.

[@edwardcook5282]

There is more water IN the earth than ON it .

[@mrscience1409]

Nope, 95% of all water is the oceans. All the fresh water including ground water, lakes, rivers, ice, water vapor and clouds make up less than 5% of the water on earth.

[@alantasman8273]

@@mrscience1409 Nope...look up vast water reservoirs under the continents...there are two to three times as much water as in the world surface oceans.

[@mrscience1409]

@@alantasman8273 you misunderstood the findings. It’s not liquid water. It’s hydroxide radicals trapped in crystals.

[@alantasman8273]

@@mrscience1409 Tell that to those who published the result ...Water whether it is liquid, and ice or a gas is still water. Water Dampness is evidence of water.

[@mrscience1409]

@@alantasman8273 Except it is not damp. Water is HOH, a hydrogen molecule H+ attached to a hydroxide radical OH-. Water subducted into the earths mantle is torn apart by the extreme heat and pressure into its constituent parts. The OH radicals are trap in a crystal called ringwoodite. There is no dampness, because there is no water. Simply rock with the remains of water. It is not gas, liquid or even plasma. This is very easy to verify. Just research it. Don't listen to apologist who have an agenda and use a selective interpretation of science.

[@LadyLiberty4U]

Wow! Praise God! Amazing and fascinating presentation. I've struggled with reconciling my faith in the Word of God and the teachings of the World regarding the age of fossils and the "geologic record". My brain went towards thinking that the genealogies in the Old Testament, don't always say how old someone was when they had children or when they died (except Methuselah), so if people lived A thousand or even thousandS of years, until after a certain point, when our years began to be shortened... But this lecture helped me a tremendously towards seeing how "Biblical Time" CAN refute the atheistic "science" cult of "evolution"! Now, can you help me out with explaining Megalithic building techniques and technologies that seem to far exceed our current level of ability or knowledge? It smacks of civilizations that existed before our own and were much more advanced than we are right now? I really do have a gut feeling that the PTB (the satanic cabal that's attempting to destroy God's greatest creation: Namely us!) have wiped out advanced civilizations and our own history of them. Just as they're trying to "memory hole" our own recent history. I'd be very interested in your take on that idea. Thank you and may God Bless you! 👏👏🙌✝👣✝💪✝🛡✝💝✝🙌✝ PS: Can you tell me why the button to allow me to Save this lecture to one of my myriad of playlists is completely missing?? I've rarely seen that, except when YT is playing silly boogers against channels *they* don't like. TY!

[@Scorpion40-m6d]

Psalm 100 Worship the LORD with gladness; come before him with joyful songs. Know that the LORD is God. It is he who made us, and we are his ; we are his people, the sheep of his pasture. Enter his gates with thanksgiving and his courts with praise; give thanks to him and praise his name.

[@vernoncleveland6806]

Amen

[@Scorpion40-m6d]

@@vernoncleveland6806 amen!

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

I know.....thanks to AIG!

[@Yamyatos]

You think you know, and are wrong, thanks to channels like AIG!

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

@@Yamyatos anything that comes against God will be proven to be a lie. Just like evolution.

[@jamesnewman8011]

AIG is demonstrably wrong on almost everything it claims. All you "know" from this is cherry picked data that has been twisted to fit a already drawn conclusion. AIG is intellectually dishonest and people should seek actual truth rather than taking someone else's word for it

[@holidayrap]

Now, as my mind caught hold upon this thought, I cried within my heart: O Jesus, thou Son of God, have mercy on me, who am in the gall of bitterness, and am encircled about by the everlasting chains of death. 19 And now, behold, when I thought this, I could remember my pains no more; yea, I was harrowed up by the memory of my sins no more.

[@IAMhassentyou]

Amen AIG 🙏

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

''Amen'' is right. These are religious rants that creationists pretend is science or ''debunking centuries of science'' without doing any science at all.

[@vernoncleveland6806]

@@Creationism-is-pseudoscience Troll, you argue with every creationists you can find just to argue but never wanna find the Truth. The Truth is in the LORD God Almighty aka Jesus Christ. I hope and pray your hardened heart becomes soft and you turn away from the wickedness and get right with Lord Jesus.

[@vernoncleveland6806]

@@Creationism-is-pseudoscience Also, God bless you sir/ma’am.

[@daviddroescher]

Back in the 90's milford lake in Kansas had to do an emergency water release to prevent a catastrophic dam over toping . A few days later 168' of hard bedrock was eroded exposing several dinosaur skeletons. Now conciter the Grand Canyon. Soft sandy fresh sediments getting hit with much more water

[@captivedesk3168]

The earth hasnt been underwater since land first appeared over 3 billion years ago, says every credible geologist in the world.

[@neilwinslow8374]

Those timeliness geologists are taught were whisked out of the imagination of Charles Lyell, who was NOT a geologist. Thus the cycle started, and was repeated, and if you think "peer reviewed" means truly objective, you need to learn more about mankind, and research the issues with "peer review."

[@sciencerules2825]

@@neilwinslow8374 You really think geologists have learned nothing about the Earth's physical history in the last 200 years? 🙄

[@captivedesk3168]

@@neilwinslow8374 When you think all of the scientists are lying to you but one turnip named Ken Ham has it all figured out, you may be in a cult

[@alantasman8273]

Wow...now to explain the marine fossils at the peak of Mt Everest. LOL

[@captivedesk3168]

@@alantasman8273 plate tectonics. Take a remedial science class

[@uconnstudentninja]

Citation needed for 44:46 - 45:01

[@globalcoupledances]

I doubt there are citations of his claims

[@samburns3329]

The guy is not telling the truth. We don't find any extant species buried with dinosaurs. We find the *distant ancestors* of some mammals, some birds, some insects fossilized along with dinosaurs.

[@globalcoupledances]

@@samburns3329 unclear why your comment is hidden. Hope my thumbs up reverts it

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

​@samburns3329 there's a guy named Carl Werner that states this nonsense too in his presentation on the STANDING FOR TRUTH channel....sheer rediculous

[@jonathanrussell1140]

Citations needed for everything that comes out of a YEC mouth

[@jessicathompson1456]

I so appreciate the depth of this and the information that’s explained so well. I am only half through the video but want to mention that I wish y’all wouldn’t use the led lights, especially for the screen on the podium. It’s absolutely so irritating and distracting and I believe harmful. I’ll let you figure it all out but it would be so much nicer if it was just a plain old sign. I would have lasted about three minutes in the audience and I’m having to put the screen away from me and just listen, which takes away the images and photos and graphs and such. Thanks for hearing me on this. It’s not necessary and doesn’t improve anything. The LED actually detracts from the message, to be honest and is found to be harmful.

[@thesword-sapdog322]

You realise 😈, this is going to affect the B🤑ttom line?

[@Woopor]

You mean the mega churches who profit off of manipulating people’s emotions, right?

[@MarkJones-j5k]

So not everyone perished apparently aborigines say they have been on earth for 65000 years so how does that work

[@itsamystery5279]

Creationists will just ignore the scientific evidence like they always do.

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

Nor the nations of China, Egypt, India, Peru, other Middle Eastern people (zoroastrians) and so on....

[@dknockaert]

""" magic """

[@absolutelyfookinnobody2843]

Oh yea, let's just believe them out right without evidence. You are oozing desperation and you're a hypocrite

[@thehtehteotheithe]

clearly, they're wrong

[@kingofthejungle3833]

the major thing that has debunked the evolution theory is that these days we have technology that look at the bones of the dinosaurs, the brontesaurus vertibrae was looked at through MRI and discovered to be honeycomb in structure, now two things can be taken from this,1. these dinosaur bones are said to be fossils, not the original bones, if they were fossils they would be solid, as we are told that fossils are the rock that is formed where the bones use to be. 2. If the bones were millions of years old, they would have desintigrated to powder by now, because organic material just can't last that long.. Therefore, the dinosaur 'fossils' are actually bones and could only be a few thousand years old.

[@torikazuki8701]

Well, there's also the tiny, tiny issue of each of the trillions of cells that make up our bodies are each a mico-miniaturzied Chemical Factory more advanced than our best automated factories. While in Darwin's day they knew about 'cells' they thought they were just blobs of goo. They had no understanding of how stupendously complicated they were. Also, the more we understand about Computers, the more scientists are forced to admit that DNA IS a computing language, more complex and intricate than any human program by orders of magnitutde. DNA is also the most dense storage medium known. 1 Gram (about the weight of a normal paperclip) can store 700,000GB of Data.

[@sctsou]

Thank you for your contribution in God's kingdom.

[@captivedesk3168]

The engineers told Ham his boat would never float so rather than floating it on the ohio river giving rides, its a building mock up. If ham really thought it would float, float it somewhere, a sinking ark though doesn't make Ham money

[@jonathanrussell1140]

😂😂 just like the schooner Wyoming...

[@yorotirb3941]

There is a part in the bible that says the earth was covered with like a mist or humid layer in Noahs days and this is what God rained down on earth. When God made the rainbow as his covenant that is what made it so special because mankind had never seen this before the flood. Just my op.

[@tone9358]

verse?

[@jonathanrussell1140]

God lied about the rainbow. It happens every single time sunlight refracts through raindrops since the dawn of time.

[@alantasman8273]

Genesis 2:6 But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground. This was probably from vast underground reservoirs that broke up at the time of the flood. These waters had already been peculating through under tremendous pressures from below causing the mist or water vapor upon the land.

[@marynavanvuuren7679]

Very interessting! Thank you!

[@samburns3329]

Sorry but a literal Noah's Flood / Ark was scientifically disproven over two centuries ago. For example: 1. The world is full of geologic features (angular unconformities, the vertically incised meanders in Goosenecks State Park, the Columbia Basalt Group) impossible to form in a one year one time Flood. 2. We have lots of archaeological evidence of cities and cultures (Jericho is 11,000 years old, The Jiahu culture in China is 9500 years old) which lived right through the Flood without noticing. 3. Modern genetics shows no extant species underwent a severe genetic bottleneck only 4400 years ago. If the Ark story were true ALL extant species would show such a bottleneck. 4. Besides well established radiometric dating we also have lots of non-radiometric proxies (tree rings, lake varves, ice cores) showing the Earth is way older than 6000 years. Arguing about Noah's Ark is like arguing if the Starship Enterprise could beat the Death Star in a 1-on-1 battle. It may be intellectually amusing but has no connection to anything in reality. 🙂

[@robczarski8537]

You think you sound intelligent but in spelling your beliefs out you are only showing your foolishness. You have such faith to believe in your predecessors. Humans. Weak and foolish and ignorant. You have Faith no Bible thumper ever could. Science is only ever been proved wrong yet you adhere to it's accuracy with a zeal and passion we can only call insane. Scientists used to admit science was a work in progress. But you science sycophants have lost sight of that. Every real scientist knows nothing is ever proven impossible. So your disproofs are simply examples that you have abandoned reason.

[@samburns3329]

@@robczarski8537 Feel free to post your scientific rebuttals to the scientific facts I listed. 🙂 You won't of course. No YECs even try.

[@avafury4584]

Not at all. God's word is true.

[@Adventist1997]

1. Did you actually watch the video? 2. Do you know how archeologists date things? Because there isn't a date that just comes with pottery and stuff. Like finding a broken hour glass that's still going. You'd have to make a bunch of assumptions to figure out when it broke. You don't even know if it was upright the entire time it was broken, so you have to assume the present state of it was the same consistently in the past. 3. Ice rings are based on hot and cold which they presume was based on winter to summer. That's not true for every layer because a hot morning sun would melt the ice a bit then it freezes again at night. Meaning you could get several lays withing days or hours depending on the weather. Tree rings are based on wheather as well. If they're healthy enough they grow, if not they don't. Aka, good climate to grow vs not a good climate. Since when is the climate 100% consistent throughout the year? Its still summer but it was 60 degrees today while every other day has been 90 degrees. Did that temperature change make a year pass? 4. People have tried at failed at making a giant boat with a sale. The current ships for shipping crates and such are the same kind of design as Noah's. Only he didn't have a Rutter or engine because there was nowhere to go. But cargo ships are PERFECT for massive waves and such. That design is meant to withstand a lot of force from water. They haven't made one of those out of wood in recent times. 😂

[@clarkridlen1966]

When was the first heart beat? Why do humans wear clothes even in tropical climates? "They ate from the tree of knowledge and their eyes were opened. They became like gods and they knew they were naked."

[@johnlord8337]

The biblical Old Testament, using the Hebrew lunar calendar of 28 day months (13 months/year + 4-5 days tossed away), the biblical Flood happened (with restored timeline, Abraham's life, and Moses and the true date of the Exodus 1207/1206 BCE), in ~1987 BCE.

[@KenJackson_US]

So is there a separate timeline for the Bible and for the secular history of Sumer, Akkad, Assyria, Babylon and Egypt? Hardly. All those secular empires descended from Noah. God preserved the original timeline in Genesis 11 of the Greek Septuagint. The flood happened at least 5000 years ago, maybe 3298 BC.

[@johnlord8337]

​@@KenJackson_US You are not listening. There is absolute correlated history (and biblical) timelines from ~1187 BCE downwards from Egypt times. Backwards, it is proven that the Exodus happened 207/1206 BCE. Horemheb "A" the (said) pharoah of the Exodus, with sibling brother Merneptah, were the grandsons of Ramses II the Great. There are granite pillars on both sides of the Red Sea, where it is (said) the Exodus took place. Also the black obelisk of Merneptah (actually Horemheb "A") states that they were glad to get rid of the Israelites. It is Horemheb "A" father of the only son Horemheb "B" who died in the Exodus. All of this is written up in Ramses II the Greats tomb, with a painted genealogy on the wall. Historians and theologians have schmucked the 18th and 19th dynasties as successive, WHEN THEY WERE COLLATERAL (with the Tuthmose and Amenhoteps of the Nile Delta). The actuala enslavement (minimal wage jobs and construction industry) was onlyi 89-92 years in length. The book of Exodus and Leviticus mentions the parentage AND AGES of Moses' fathers. Moses was born during this time, 1287/1286 BCE. It is known history that the Nile Delta was taken back from the Sea Peoples, Hyksos (Eastern Hebrew) and Habiru (Abraham's Western Hebrew) in 1295, 1292 BCE. There was NO 400 years enslavement !!! Dating all this back, Abraham was given a prophecy at AGE 100 (1587/1586 BCE) about his descendants. Abraham was born in Western Europe 1687/1686 BCE. From there it can be traced that Noah, his 3 sons ages, the Flood happened ~1987 BCE. Stop the stoopid statements, and listen up ... I'm trying to teach you something. Correct history and correct biblical timeline. This also massively rewrites and corrects wrongful Egyptian history, dynasties, and timelines of ancientness. Also the Israelites came from Canaan, down into the Nile Delta, under Joseph, and lived in the eastern Nile Delta of the land of Goshen. It was the Tribe of Judah and Tribe of Levi who intermarried with the nobility and royalty of these 2 Egyptian dynasties. As such, the Tribe of Judah lineage has namesaked proofs. Judah had, by Thamar, sons Zara (Osiris) and Pharez (Horus). Pharez had son Hezron (Osirion). Hezron marries with the Theban Egyptian Ramesside dymasty, and has namesaked son Ram (Ramesses). Ram marries with the Nile Delta Egyptian Amenhotep dynasty, and has namesaked son Amminidab (Amenhotep). Amenhotep marries again into the Nile Delta Amenhotep IV (Anhkenaton) family, having son Exodus Prince "Nashon" of Judah being the Hebrew namesaked after his mother "Asenenaton", the daughter of Tutanhkamon. Grecian-Egyptian historian Manetho (Amenhotep) records that the Zara-ites left the Nile Delta 150 years before the Exodus (1207/1206 BCE) ... 1357/1356 BCE. Some 60-65 years before the Nile Delta enslavement by the Tutmose and Amenhotep dynasty. They scattered and became the new nations of the Mediterranean, Scandinavia, and Europe. Heman (King Minos of Knossos Greece, Linear B Hebrew put onto the ol Minoan Linear A language), Dara (Darius, Thor of Germany), Ethan (Odin of Scandinavia), Gymry (Cymry of Cimmerians, Gomers of Russia and Central Arab Republics region, and the Cymry of Wales, proto-British), ... and Chalchol (Kulkul Khan, Chalchol the Great OF MAYAN AMERICAN fame). Trans-Atlantic sailing between Old and New Worlds 1300s BCE and earlier ! So stop the stoopid talk, with little to talk about, and no research to back up your lip flapping ... whether a human or AI troll.

[@eneeland]

Why are you using BCE? How about BC? You know, Before Christ.

[@johnlord8337]

Because I am of the original and Celtic church, when the first community were called "christians," ... 300 years older than the Pharisee catholic church and its theology and words. It - IS - BCE Before Christian Era, and CE Christian Era. And we look to the original apostles and leadership of the Yehidah community ... with the Gospels and Letters of James, John, and Peter (Simeon Acyph, Cephas), and less-so to the Gentile (and Zara-ite expats and Gentiles of Europe and the Mideast) Pauline letters.

[@rustysm8080]

​@@johnlord8337 That isn't a common acronym of BCE. Almost always, it means Before the Common Era... A secular deliberate removal of Christ.

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

The flood was a natural and supernatural event. Humanity would not have been able to survive if God had not intervened. The Flood of Noah’s day (2348 BC) was a year-long global catastrophe that destroyed the pre-Flood world, reshaped the continents, buried billions of creatures, and laid down the rock layers. It was God’s judgment on man’s wickedness and only eight righteous people, and representatives of every kind of land animal, were spared aboard the Ark.

[@mrdoginabog5499]

What about bristlecone pines?

[@luish1498]

apperently egiptians were building pyramids under water!! LOL

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

@@mrdoginabog5499 read: Biblical Chronology and the 8,000-Year-Long Bristlecone Pine Tree-Ring Chronology (AIG)

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

read: Biblical Chronology and the 8,000-Year-Long Bristlecone Pine Tree-Ring Chronology Answers in Genesis

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

Biblical Chronology and the 8,000-Year-Long Bristlecone Pine Tree-Ring Chronology

[@julesverne2509]

dont worry, I'm still giving the transcript to my chatbot. This is good stuff

[@Thomas-bq4ed]

These videos make me a little sad. People would rather be ignorant then abandon their archaic beliefs. Peddling lies and making a living doing it. Using no science at all, rejecting all modern scientific research, and dating the food using strictly biblical text is insane.

[@gtdetan]

Why is the idea of an all powerful God that created the universe impossible? What makes you right and creationists wrong? Funny thing is, if creationists are just mere kooks, at the end of the day they will just have a laugh. But if you are wrong and have repeatedly rejected God because your professor told you to, you will be lost eternally. Imagine believing that (or example) we can disassemble a tiny cessna, put the bolts and everything on top of a bomb in a pile, then detonate. And boom, we have a well assembled flyable plane. Not to mention the millions of lines of code in the avionics. Explosions do not create order, they create disorder! And that is a major issue for this Big Bang theory that evolutionists are forcing on everyone as the only fact. In fact, you need about 4 perfect big bangs each accomplishing a different stage in evolution (nothing to something antimatter to matter and then life). How did non living matter become living? Where did that life "energy" come from? My suggestion to you is that you humble yourself, because you do not know everything. Creationism is a THEORY just like Evolution. WE.DO.NOT.KNOW! Allow both both sides to put forward arguments and let people independently decide what makes better sense to them. Don't bully people by calling them archaic just because they do not hold the same beliefs as you.

[@mmaimmortals]

this is misinformation and untrue. there is available scientific evidence and it is not being rejected. evidence doesn’t tell you the age of anything. age cannot be measured. it must be observed. rejecting interpretation of evidence is what is actually happening. deep time is not observable or testable. macro evo is not observable or testable. no technology was ever developed using deep time or random, unguided processes. using science to “prove” naturalism is self defeating.

[@MaynardState]

Where is all of this technical information in the Bible? I assume it's hidden there somewhere since no one was alive to observe the drift.

[@jonschlottig9584]

I'm really glad i gave this an honest listen. Compelling argument. I'm inclined to believe your analysis. God bless ❤

[@miscamisca6775]

Let us consider that for a moment, if it really was this deep time with slow evolutionary development, then would we not expect to find billions of dead things in different layers of different types? And that is exactly what we find in the fossil record.

[@alantasman8273]

Billions of dead things found in strata laid down quickly during a global flood is exactly what we see in nature. The global catastrophe even moved land masses rapidly causing collisions resulting mountain chains around the world being lifted up. Even marine fossils are found at the summit of Mt Everest which was raised up during a land mass collision with what is now the Asian continent. These land mass collisions caused rapid rises mountain elevations ...the Himalayas were not raised up very slowly over millions of years.

[@miscamisca6775]

@@alantasman8273 "The global catastrophe even moved land masses rapidly causing collisions resulting mountain chains around the world being lifted up." It did? That must have created enormous amount of heat, where did all that heat go during that year? " Even marine fossils are found at the summit of Mt Everest" Yes, that is becaosue Everest is made of sedimentary rock. "These land mass collisions caused rapid rises mountain elevations ...the Himalayas were not raised up very slowly over millions of years." Himalayas are still rising, but where did all that heat go ?

[@Rev14v7]

We would see more transitional forms, like a continuum really, instead of distinct types of creatures that are fully formed and generally very much like what we see today. There should be animals with half legs, half eyes, and many other useless parts. They have never been found. And without catastrophes on Noah's Flood scale, no, we wouldn't see the layers we see that span continents.

[@jonathanrussell1140]

​@@alantasman8273 the Himalayas *were* raised up slowly over millions of years. The Chinese have a flood myth in which people were able to escape to higher ground. Please stop this nonsense.

[@jonathanrussell1140]

​@@Rev14v7do you actually know anything about evolution and the fossil record? We have evidence of exactly what you say has never been found.

[@dtarby2095]

Start by PROVING the Bible is the word of God?! Man wrote the Bible , changed the Bible, and interpret the Bible = lies

[@maureengibbons9472]

Have you read the Bible? I pray that when you stand before, Jesus when you depart this earth, and you will answer to him for your sin, I pray you will accept him in your heart and be righteous because of his blood he shed for you

[@alantasman8273]

We don't have to prove anything...We accept the Word of God on faith...that were are made in his image. You accept you the offspring of pond scum that somehow came alive. Enough said.

[@IdahosJeffery]

Your theory about plate tectonics isn't exactly 100% accurate according to Genesis 1. If you can imagine a solid sphere of land under the water and God called forth after the opening of Genesis said that darkness was upon the face of the deep and the spirit of God moved across the waters. When he calls forth the land breaks underneath and rises. This is why it looks like it should have went together like a puzzle. There are a few other items in Genesis 1 that reinforce my faith such as the fact that light exists here on Earth because of our atmosphere. If you had a ship and were to travel between the Earth and sun and viewed with the naked eye in between the two bodies you would see darkness. You would think you'd see light but unless you're looking at that big ball of flaming gases directly you don't see light. The rays travel through space and once they hit our atmosphere or more precisely the water molecules in our atmosphere that refract that light then we have sunlight here on Earth. If you saw Felix Baumgartner's jump from the edge of space here on youtube in that Redbull challenge he did, you'd notice as he's rotating that it's dark then light then dark then light but it's not light when he's facing space unless he looks directly at the sun. Instead all of space is dark and when he's turned back toward the Earth then it's light. Genesis 1:6-8 is the 2nd day of creation and God creates atmosphere. Remember too that it didn't rain then. It wouldn't rain until the flood in 1656 so what was the purpose of dividing the waters? It's talking about atmosphere and the water molecules that were in the air or as Genesis 1 calls it heaven. Also it describes Eve's creation and that God put Adam to sleep and opened him up and took a rib then closed him up. Sounds like surgery to me. Lastly, Genesis 1 gives us DNA record as God uses a rib to make Eve which sounds almost like cloning but God had already done the hard part making Adam with his X and Y chromosome. With Eve He only needed to isolate and duplicate the X Chromosome to make the female counterpart void of a Y Chromosome. Had he made Eve first then believe it or not making Adam would have required new material as she did not have the full DNA to create on her own man genetically speaking. With God all things are possible but from a genetics standpoint it was easier to make Adam first and use his DNA to make a help meat. Lastly, I'll leave you with this: We all have a mother and father. They had a mother and father and so on. If you were to trace it all back there is a common ancestor we now know through DNA mapping that we all share. Every human on the planet is related. Now science thought they'd be cute and call these people Y-Chromosome Adam and Mitochondrial Eve. They believe that the two though didn't exist in the same time period and they're sort of right. You see the Bible says that Noah and his three sons along with Noah's wife and his three son's wives were the only souls who survived the flood. Depending on how closely related the three daughters-in-law were to each other and to Noah himself would depend on how far back toward Eve pre-flood you have to go to find the closest common ancestor while Noah and his three sons sharing the same DNA would have been the male line not Adam. The female side may actually go back closer to Eve. Oh back to everyone has a father and mother. So there was a 1st man and woman then we know this because of DNA. Where'd they come from? No matter if they were homosapien or some other homoerectus and we can have a discussion about the Tower of Babel then as God changed folks and scattered them across all the earth, ever wonder why there are bears on nearly every continent? Why they look different and don't match up with DNA? How about that Ark too that couldn't hold all the species we have today of animals. No unicorn but the Bible mentioned it. So if there were less species did God change them too and scatter everything during the Tower of Babel? Again this is speculative because the Bible doesn't say outright. I caution anyone who recounts my crazy theories to remember their place and Revelation 22:18-19. Don't add to or take away from that book. Tell them some nutjob named James who's son named his youtube account some other name said so. :) There has to be a God because there had to be something that didn't have a beginning that made the first man and woman otherwise you have a paradox. If Adam and Eve weren't the first then there would still have had to be a first and that would have had to have come from somewhere. Science wants you to believe there were as many evolutions that happened to similar subjects dozens or more times for each ethnicity that exists/existed on the earth and that from those "evolutions" came man from the cradle of civilization either North Africa or Mesopotamia which the Bible says as much about the location and that they walked depending on their now ethnicity to different corners of the earth, some crossing an ice bridge they still argue for in some circles. The Bible says God did it and he did it at the same time. Considering that common ancestor seems God's got this one a lot more believable than some magic evolution and trek theory. Also, in some Bibles there's a pilcrow between Genesis 1:2 and Genesis 1:3. For those who don't know a pilcrow is also called a paragraph mark or marker. It shows in this case a text transcribed by King James' scribes in Old English that there is a new paragraph starting at verse 3 but why? The purpose of a paragraph ending and a new one beginning instead of running on is because of a change in the subject, place, idea or time. The subject is still creation. The place of that creation is heaven and earth with special emphasis on the earth itself. So why is there a new paragraph? Well, this one is gonna be a bit hard for some folks to understand and many are going to disagree without fully giving this idea a chance and I want to say before I continue that this is speculative but given the evidence seems to be not only plausible but most likely. You see the Jewish day doesn't begin at midnight or even in the morning like ours does but instead at sundown of the previous evening. Why? Because God said let there be light and there was light and God divided the light from the darkness and the evening and the morning were the first day. The darkness came first so this isn't poetic license when it says the evening and the morning were the first day. So God created that first day "The heavens and the earth"....let me say again the heavens and the earth. We're talking about everything with exception of life on this planet. He created everything in the first ???24hour period? Really? Then it took him as long to create man or animals? You're saying he created in the same amount of time the universe and frogs. It took God as long to make a dog as it did Pluto. Here's an idea, when did time begin? Did it start being counted before or after God made the clockwork that is our solar system with the sun in the center. So when again did he make light? Verse 3 says He said Let There Be Light. He'd already created the heavens and the earth before he created light. So did God create the heavens and the earth on the first day or before? ;) It's a crazy world, I'm just living in it. Thanks for reading and God Bless.

[@asonei3531]

Radiometric dating shows that the earth is a few billion years old. By making the claim that it is a few thousand years old, you already discredit yourself. Why can anyone believe the rest that you're saying?

[@mikevangelderen9402]

Who says it's really that old? How do you know carbon dating is accurate? Because atheist scientists say so?

[@Huckabilly-w7g]

Could be a change in the value of the velocity of light. That would change the rate of radioactive decay. The first light in the universe didn't come from stars. It predates atoms. It appeared at about 300K years after the big bang, and stars didn't form until about 500 million years. The first light appeared at all places in the universe at approximately the same time. This is inferred by the uniformity in the CMB.

[@globalcoupledances]

@mikevangelderen9402 - Not with carbon dating, but with Uranium-Lead dating

[@KenJackson_US]

You discredit yourself by not thinking through those dating techniques. They depend on the *assumption* of starting conditions, that the starting daughter elements didn't exist or were known. No one recorded those conditions. They can only be guessed. But you believe it as gospel truth.

[@globalcoupledances]

@KenJackson_US - Zirconium crystal can not form if there is lead. Lava can not contain Argon

[@avi8r66]

4,400 years ago several societies around the world existed and show absolutely no sign of disruption. That means no global flood happened. You can push that time period back to even 10,000 years and that problem will still haunt your fictional timeline. Fewer societies were running, but it's not zero.

[@joeythebushkangaroo1]

Really, I'd be interested to know the names of these societies & the places...

[@avi8r66]

@@joeythebushkangaroo1 China and Japan were making pottery and establishing themselves 14,000 years ago. Egypt was building pyramids 5,000 years ago (which means they weren't a new culture at that point). Summeria was also building large temples around then, again, speaks to them being well established already. The people who make up those cultures had been around for a long time prior, shifting from hunter gatherers to less migratory cultures as they learned to farm and trade. Those along the coasts and rivers were learning to make boats for fishing and trade as well. And they didn't just disappear 4,400 years ago. They continued building, they continued fighting and reproducing.

[@alantasman8273]

@@avi8r66 The Chinese and Japanese are the decedents of Shem. The Chinese calendar is lunisolar, incorporating elements of a lunar calendar with those of a solar calendar. It has been in continual use in China for almost 4000 years. Let's see...the flood took place some 4350 years ago...that would be about right. Please get up to speed on your history.

[@mmaimmortals]

Your 14k timeline is fictional. It is derived based on a long complex weaving of guesses and preconceived notions. It is not supported by strong physical evidence or by written history.

[@MariaWalker-qo3vi]

I do believe the flood was recent. But my question is this: Why are there so many locations, Grand Canyon being one of them, and other southern states (I have not investigated much beyond that yet), that appear to have been literally scorched by intense heat, even to the point of melting rock and brick. You can search for images of melted brick and rock and see what I’m saying - if you are unfamiliar with this idea. There’s a lot I have questions about.

[@LeonSemiPro]

Stop the misinformation. Darwin did not just think up his theories from finches. He understood the fossil evidence and proposed a theory that gave a good explanation for why fossil sites contain the remains of extinct life forms. Darwin didn't destroy creationism. Dinosaurs did, simply by existing.

[@tomriddle483]

Read the book of Enoch, learn who the Nephilim were, why they were worshiped and what they did. Fossilized remains of giant human skeletons have been found all around the world. Ranging in size, many of them have been recovered with giant weapons, armor, and strange artifacts dubbed OOPARTS (Out of Place Artifacts). The current worldview model for humanity doesn't support the existence of a giant human race (according to evolution). These enormous ancient human beings were worshipped throughout various world religions of which tell of many of them slaying dragons. It is important to note that the term "dragon" was replaced by the word "dinosaur" in 1871 by Sir. Edward Owen. Hence, any reference in ancient literature to dragons, is a reference to dinosaurs

[@LeonSemiPro]

@tomriddle483 No, fossils of giants are a fairy tale. If you're an adult with any experience, you would know who you can pitch lies to. You can't pitch your crazy ideas to atheists.

[@solobusiness4320]

Him trying to explain always billions of years of fossils that we can literally see and date. By saying it all happened in one year is just absurd this guy has no clue what he’s talking about

[@davidgardner863]

He’s just reading out of Ken Ham’s playbook.

[@cameronosborne7405]

How are the fossils dated, what is the instrument?

[@globalcoupledances]

@cameronosborne7405 - fossils dated with index fossils

[@davidgardner863]

@@spamm0145 , Radiometric dating. But you will say it’s not reliable because the samples collected by creationists and not sent to the proper labs give wildly different results.

[@farcovidiu3110]

Seems You did not listen at all. He just brought common sense geologic arguments for what he said. Either You have an equally documented reply, or otherwise please do not make statements without a rational basis and with no basis in reality. God bless you.

[@shellygee137]

@Kevin Hadsall: Would you please share the name of the book mentioned at the end of your message that helped you in having dialogues with humanists? Thank you.

[@creationmission7907]

The Ultimate Proof of Creation by Dr. Jason Lisle

[@Woopor]

0:14 it always cracks me up how Apologists talks about how scientists can’t be correct because they weren’t there to witness the events 66 Million years ago, and they subsequently begin talking about a book whose events ALSO weren’t witnessed by anyone alive today, and who’s authors aren’t even entirely known at that

[@joeythebushkangaroo1]

Some 40 writers of the 66 books in the Holy Scriptures are all known,we know who they are,some small amount of verses are unsure as to which writer wrote which verses. That's all. All were led along by Gods Holy Spirit,his invisible force or power, to write down his words for all mankind to read over 16 centuries. Many were unknown to each other & from different regions & countries. There is only one Author,God Almighty. The writers were used as a secretary dictates for a Boss. When the letter is received,all understand the letter is not from the secretary, but it's from the Boss. It has been preserved even when enemies burnt people at the stake for having or translating a Bible. It has survived no matter what has been thrown at it. Gods word cannot be destroyed, the most popular book on earth & the most copies printed of any book. Praise God you people! 2 Timothy 3:16,17 ALL SCRIPTURE IS INSPIRED OF GOD... Around 732 B.C Isaiah wrote ISAIAH 40:22 that the earth is a CIRCLE. It was not until 200yrs later that a school of Greek philosophers reasoned that the earth was likely spherical. How did Isaiah know this? He wrote what he was directed to, by the Creator.

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

​@@joeythebushkangaroo1you should probably do some reading into new testament authorship. You may learn a great deal...like all 4 gospels were anonymous and written at least 2nd hand decades after the apparent event.... Also a circle is not a sphere....this is a very important detail to differentiate.

[@agemoth]

​@@Johnny_Eh-theistthe word 'Sphere' probably wasn't invented yet?

[@jonathanrussell1140]

​@@joeythebushkangaroo1 you went to a lot of trouble to type all that and then ruined it by suggesting that a circle is the same as a sphere. Nice try.

[@shellygee137]

Both perspectives require faith: a choice to have faith inthe Word of GOD or faith in Darwin's theory and in scientists of the world who choose to not to believe in the Creator.

[@poliincredible770]

It all makes sense when you start with God's word. It all gets ridiculous when you start with darwin's presumptions.

[@Johnny_Eh-theist]

Darwin was one man, that made an incredible observation. From that a hypothesis was formed about natural selection. This was/is observed every day in nature. The most fit for their environment survive to reproduce, those that are less fit die or fail to reproduce. If you think that is where evolution started and stopped I have some bad news for you.....we have learned so much more in the 150 years since Darwins observation. The best part, Darwin was the only one observing this process at the same time. Alfred Russel Wallace was separately observing natural selection at work. 2 completely isolated observers finding the exact same process in nature.....that's a pretty firm foundation to build from.

[@katamas832]

It doesn't make sense to you because you don't understand Evolution, plain and simple.

[@poliincredible770]

@@Johnny_Eh-theist you said 2 people observed natural selection and that is a firm foundation??? 2 observers is far from solid, and no they didn't observe it: Nature doesn't have a mind, a body, or anything required to make selections. The term "natural selection is a metaphorical anthropomorphic term. What we observe is genetic information causing life forms to reproduce offspring of the same taxonomic family as the previous generation, which is what Genesis 1 says God designed to happen.

[@poliincredible770]

@@katamas832 I noticed you didn't give any examples of observed transitions.

[@poliincredible770]

@@Johnny_Eh-theist we've seen trillions of fly births since darwin published his hypothesis and every one of them has resulted in more flies. That's a pretty firm foundation to know his presumptions were ridiculous.

[@paulm7347]

This is really good but has a major flaw. I am speaking as a Geologist Geophysicist, Physicist and a Retired Missionary. Everything you posted is true but there is a flaw in it. Also, the bible deals specifically with this flaw as most over look it or do not even think it applies. I point this out as I became a born again believer after reading this in the bible. You see the earth is like 4.5 billion years old. That is fact and not fiction. If any creationist tries to say the earth is just 10 to 12 thousand years old, you will get busted big time and there is absolute proof that the earth is older than that. Secondly and more importantly, there was more than 1 global flood in earth's past. Yes, there was a flood roughly 6000 years ago. But there was two earlier ones as well. This is truth that can not be denied. Lastly, Fossil record. This is a more subjective area and the weakest of all the arguments for Evolution. However, just like the flood there are multiple periods of different life forms that are separated by each flood event. This is problematic for Creationists who is not knowledgeable to counter it. What is the real timeline of earth needs to be addressed so that creationist can stand solid and not contradict known provable science and adhere to what scripture actually says? In this case, I do not have to get into much of the evolutionary arguments if you understand the true timeline of events given in the bible. Hint, the earth is 4.5 billion years old. Scripture does not contradict this! It is a matter of careful reading of the scriptures and understanding exactly what you are reading and how it applies and falls. The scriptures have places which add information here and there that expand upon the Genesis account. You pointed out one from Psalms. There is another in the Book of Job. However, most creationists are severely and shockingly ignorant of the one in Jeremiah. In Jeremiah 4:23-28, is a visionary verse. It is specifically talking about Genesis 1:2! What is interesting about it is this? Jeremiah sees the earth without form and void. Notes how fruitful places are a wilderness and so forth. Then Jeremiah makes a comment that Man and Birds are not seen alive or dead! Kind of an important factoid. However, Jeremiah sees destroyed cities. What does this mean? So, in Genesis 1:2 the reason why the perfectly created earth in verse 1:1 is suddenly without form and void according to Jeremiah is God destroyed it out of his fierce anger. Modern man and birds are recently noted in the fossil record and not found anywhere else. So, if their was humanoid creatures in the in the past, God destroyed them. This answers the fossil record of these 500k year old bones of humanoids that Creationist really have not been able to address out of ignorance. It also addresses the fossil record specifically that of Ordovician period fossils which is the go to evolutionist fossil record proof against creationist. Jeremiah crushes the evolutionist here. In fact, Jeremiah's vision absolutely destroyed anything the evolutionist bring forward today and anything in the future. The problem this bring to the evolutionist is the bible points out to multiple creation and destruction events of earth! These destruction extinction events are in the fossil record. If the bible accounts for it, then the evolutionist no longer have anything useful to bring to the table. They immediately become a debunked branch of science! If you have more question just ask.

[@sciencerules2825]

Kudos for you for trying to bring some science as well as common sense into this discussion. Sadly I'm afraid it will fall on deaf ears.

[@alantasman8273]

Good thing you are a retired missionary...why be a stumbling block for others. Read Exodus 20:11 God made everything in six literal 24 days and rested on day seven as an example to keep the sabbath holy and for man to rest one day out of seven. God did not rest for millions or billions of years on day seven. The Bible provides a clear genealogy of Adam to Abraham and Jesus the Christ. This is how we can determine that the age of the Earth is a little over six thousand years old. Those believers trying to shoehorn deep time into the scriptures are denying /warping God's word...and there will be an accounting for it.

[@paulm7347]

@@alantasman8273 Seriously, you insult rather than comment. So, sad. Secondly, what I stated does not negate Exodus 20:11. The earth was created from being made Null and Void in 6 days. That is fact not fiction. However, you insult God with your position. It is sad that you are still on baby milk or just another non christian and bringing your insults. You should read VERY CAREFULLY Romans 14: 1-12. Perhaps you can grow more if you are a Christian. If you understand fully what Paul is saying when you read this type of info when someone brings truth to the table, then you may understand what may be ignored or covered up by mainstream scholars who do not want to admit certain truths or simply did not know for whatever reason. Many Seminary Schools are teaching and promoting blasphemy. The sheer number of so called Christian leaders who write lots of books are rejecting Christ at an alarming rate. The newest trend by top Seminary Scholars and teachers is to say that that an All Powerful and Omnipotent God does not exist. Rather, God is a generalized term for Aliens who founded earth like a colony. Seriously, that is now being taught in several Seminaries at the graduate doctoral level.

[@jamesnewman8011]

I am not sure where you are getting there was a global flood 6k years ago. The only way I see you coming up with that is by ignoring evidence that counters the flood claim. Evidence I would think is known to any Geophysicist who isn't a quack. There are formations in Earth that form only over millions of years in dry places and would have been wiped out by a global flood. There isn't enough water to flood the entire world. There is no evidence of water coverage in the ice core layers of Antarctica. The list goes on. The idea of the Ark is also impractical. There are a bunch of physical limitations that go against the idea that a wooded boat held 1.8 billion creatures for a whole year. How did any of the creature unique to Australia get to Australian? Why don't we have any fossils or evidence of Kangaroos in the Northern Hemisphere? To answer these questions, you have to completely abandoned science and just straight into God miracling it all. I, myself, spent some time trying to scientifically justify the Biblical accounts, but it doesn't work. Either the Bible is wrong about it or God manipulated physical reality to make it seem as though the Bible is wrong, which seems rather dishonest for God. I think the better lose to take is that the Old Testament isn't a literal account, otherwise you are left to question the integrity of God.

[@mmaimmortals]

isochron method is more hoax than anything else. it’s quite evident that it doesn’t work. and the earth cannot be 1M years old, let alone 4.5B. erosion, C14, and magnetic field decline all say otherwise. Just to name a few problems with deep time.

[@WilliamBay]

“The tsunamis during the biblical flood were happening every hour” Ok… so, were you there to see it? Looks like you need some of that “Historical Science” to help you out with some evidence, cause I’m pretty sure Genesis doesn’t mention several tsunamis happening every hour. Maybe Moses wrote a ship’s log about it?

[@mikevangelderen9402]

Moses huh 😂

[@WilliamBay]

@@mikevangelderen9402Ooops. Turns out I know as much about the characters in the bible as this guy knows about the age of the Earth. 😂

[@samburns3329]

One of the nicest things about being a YEC is you get to make up stuff as you go and no other YEC will ever call you on it. ☺

[@avafury4584]

You shouldn't mock God

[@WilliamBay]

@@avafury4584 I'm not mocking any god. I'm mocking the people that choose to believe the Earth is 6,000 years old. There are civilizations that are older than 6,000 years, language was invented long before 6,000 years ago. BEER was invented more than 6,000 years ago. Yet these fools trick you into believing the bible is some kind of scientific document.

[@ethannelson8592]

“The pre-flood ocean crust was poised to rupture” Ok so god designed everything around sin before Adam and Eve sinned?😂😂 The mental gymnastics y’all have to go through to explain your myths and straw man science has to be exhausting😂😂

[@jonathanrussell1140]

Should have been an Olympic sport 😂😂

[@tomriddle483]

Quick question, what part of omniscient does your smooth brain not comprehend

[@ethannelson8592]

@@tomriddle483 Instead of asking a rhetorical question based on an ad hominem, why not express your dissent clearly?

[@tomriddle483]

@@ethannelson8592 did you really not understand the question?

[@ethannelson8592]

@@tomriddle483 All that’s there is an insult😂

[@aaronlarsen7447]

When I look at the predeluvian word, I consider that by the third chapter of Genesis, Tubal Cain was making tools of iron. They had math, chemistry, mechanics, 1600 hundred yrs before a 600 yr old Noah, and his sons got off the Ark, with at least a hundred yrs of building experience, each.

[@earthisasphere]

Noahs flood is geologically impossible. 1) The sodium carbonate needed for even a small single layer of limestone requires centuries or more of build up of shelled creatures and coral. When explaining the Grand Canyon, in your model, that isn't possible. In the actual model we know that the southwest U.S. was once a shallow seabed, so the sodium bicarbonate could build up over time. 2) The limestone in the G. C. also requires calm, shallow waters to form, like.... a shallow seabed. Not the most violent storm the earth would have ever seen. The hydraulic sorting claim YEC's like to peddle doesn't work either, because the water is still to deep and to volatile. 3) There are multiple places where layers of salt are separated by layers of rock. Sea's would have to evaporate, have a layer (or layers) of rock form, and then the area would have to become a sea bed again. A flood can't explain this. 4) Unconformities don't have the time needed to happen on a 6,000 year old earth. 5) The following were rulers of their respected kingdoms during the flood timelime Egypt- Pepi, Akkad - Sargon, Elam - Helu, and the Indus Valley Civ had been around for 1,000 years and continued for another 1,000 years 5) fossils and stratification layers of rock match predictions of evolution 6) Sand dunes don't have time to form 7) certain layers of rock would require forest fires to exists underwater 8) the amount of energy released during such an event would destroy the earth, also know as the heat problem 9) the mud problem 10) Ocean basins have less than a km of sedimentary rock on top, while the continental shelves are over 12 km think with sedimentary rock, a flood of that magnitude and length would have eroded away much more of the continental shelves 11) We have studied the growth rate of coral form a very long time now, and it doesn't grow fast enough to match your timeline - forget a flood, 6,000 years isn't even enough time. Look into the Eniwetok atoll if you want more info 12) evaporates and shales take too long to form and on and on and on. Oh, and I forgot an obvious one, the drop in salinity levels in the ocean would kill most, if not all, the sea life. The rise in salinity in freshwater would do the same to those creatures.

[@aaronlarsen7447]

@earthisasphere I respect your right to choose whatever religion you want. The very first statement you made about the formation of limestone is unobserved and untested. You say that my model is flawed based on your unproven theory, that requires faith..

[@thevulture5750]

The KJV Bible is mathematically encoded.

[@St-uv5bc]

No, its not. Pay attention. Hollywood is not the place you should be going to as a resource for understanding the Bible.

[@JesusSavesRepent]

@@St-uv5bcthere are whole videos on KZbin even explaining how the KJV is mathematically encoded. Look up Robert Breaker.

[@mathete9968]

😳What ???? Jesus didn't teach such things .... Do you really think that you should be ???

[@Fire_Eider]

48:17 "95% of the fossil record is of marine creatures, and they are found throughout most of the strata." Except anomalocaris, trilobites, etc., who all lived and died out before the dinosaurs. Those marine creatures aren't mixed with the dinosaurs, nor are they found in layers dated at the same time or after the Mesozoic (the dinosaur era). And where are the human fossils? Those don't show up until long *after* the dinosaurs? You're trying to say every human who lived during the flood somehow managed to avoid getting fossilized until after the last dinosaur got buried? Same situation with whales and dolphins- they don't appear in the fossil record until long after dinosaurs stopped appearing. Edit to add: and that's just marine creatures. Sabertooth cats, mammoths, rhinos, etc. don't appear until after, either.

[@sliglusamelius8578]

Mammals are found with dinosaur fossils, contrary to what you probably learned. Marine fossils are found with dinosaur fossils.

[@Fire_Eider]

@@sliglusamelius8578 Mammalians first appeared in the Triassic, yes. Cats? Capybara? Elephants? Mammals that we know today? Nope, nope, nope, and more nope. And what about BEFORE the dinosaurs? In the Permian and Carboniferous there were neither mammals nor dinos. Why are they all missing, despite their being anomalocaris, dimetrodon, gorgonopsids, and arthropleura? And those don't show up with the dinos Marine fossils being found with dino fossils isn't the issue- it's that they're ONLY FOUND within a short period, then you find other species. THAT is the ordering problem. Where are the humans that died early in the flood? Why aren't their fossils alongside the trilobites and dimetrodons?

[@cooperc4060]

​@@Fire_EiderWhy even waste your energy. These people have no clue.

[@Fire_Eider]

@@cooperc4060 for the miniscule chance of *giving someone a clue*. Foolish hope? Most likely. But maybe, just maybe, it can put a question in someone's mind, and then another helpful person can help that person learn more.

[@cooperc4060]

@@Fire_Eider Ya I think foolish hope. The things this speaker was saying is insane. I just go to these videos for the comical value now. I have friend who made lots of money age dating rocks simply by using index fossils for Shell oil company. If he ever came back and said the strata was less than 6000 years old he would lose his job. All the technology surrounding these peoples lives, from simply driving a car to medicine and DNA goes against pretty much everything this guy said.

[@williamdupree8078]

I'm a believer, I believe in the flood of Noah, I enjoy your presentation. Just one question, how did any sea animals survive such a flood?

[@creationmission7907]

While some ocean water mixed with sediments and deposited onto land, this wouldn't be the case for the *entire* global ocean. Therefore, while many sea creatures got buried, many other sea creatures also survived in those portions of the global ocean that were not thoroughly mixed with sediment. Search "How Could Fish Survive the Genesis Flood?" on the Answers in Genesis website to learn more, including an answer to the question on how some freshwater fish would have survived as well.

[@randykuhns4515]

Also,.. that the ark was sealed inside and out with pitch made it unaffected by whatever did take place during the flood,.. it is logical to think that great rafts of flotsam were floating during the flood, thus some life may have potentially been able to ride out the flood ,thus not die, except that I think that when the flooding was taking place it so completely destroyed the old earth that even the atmosphere for a time was void of oxygen which might be why the bible explicitly pointed out all air breathing animals, and never spoke of fish,.. thus why the ark was sealed with pitch inside and out,.... and to seal the door,... God shut it,...

[@davidgardner863]

That pitch wouldn’t help much against super heated water and anything in or on the water would be instantly steam cooked.

[@randykuhns4515]

@@davidgardner863 That's presuming that it even got hot as part of the destruction, but what if God literally used all the oxygen turning it into to water,... and not so much for water, but so no air breathers COULD survive? just speculation for sure, but the Bible did explicitly point out al air breathing animals, and it also pointed out about the pitch inside and out, which could have only been to waterproof it, but also possible to seal off the life inside the ark from what was going to take place outside other than the flood,..

[@davidgardner863]

@@randykuhns4515 , Do you know that water is composed of oxygen and hydrogen? Do you know that all animal life in the oceans extract oxygen from the water through gills or other means? Where do think Moses got tens of thousands of gallons of pitch? At the local Home Depot? Even the guy in this video admitted the ocean got hot but that would kill the krill, plankton, and much of sea life starting at the bottom of the food chain, only he grossly underestimated the amount of heat produced. His whole scenario is utter nonsense.

[@captivedesk3168]

You tossed logic in the trash when you embrace a flood that never happened and a magic zoo boat

[@randykuhns4515]

@@captivedesk3168 And you lost what little bit of being taking serious by your clownish reply, Clown,... now go outside and play, while grown ups talk,..

[@paulmarcil6221]

Creation scientist is an oxymoron. The last thing a 'creation scientist' is a scientist. Irrational belief cannot be swayed by science.

[@eneeland]

Almost none of evolution is science as we understand the scientific method. It is just another faith based religion. With precious little evidence. And before you go caterwauling...I am a PhD organic chemistry who is a professor of chemistry at a major university.

[@burnttoast2790]

@@eneeland Ah yes, a chemist. So uh, what exactly does that have to do with evolutionary biology? Because it sounds to me that you're just pulling a James Tour: touting respectable credentials while trying to discuss an area outside of that expertise, yet demanding to be treated as an expert in it.

[@itsamystery5279]

@@eneeland _I am a PhD organic chemistry who is a professor of chemistry at a major university._ There's today's creationist steaming pile of bullsh!t.

[@VisshanVis]

@@eneeland The top 100 universities across the world all teach evolutionary biology it is a science, not a faith-based religion do you know how many of those same universities teach creationism 0, none, not 1 single university.

[@alantasman8273]

The very founders of most of today's modern fields of scientific inquiry were men and women of faith who sought to understand the creator better. They literally wrote the books still used today to teach the various fields of study. Get up to speed on your knowledge of history.

[@TheresaWenzel-re7ed]

Dear , Answers in Genesis here is your next step there are to many people who have been gone astray . 😢 They do not know who Jesus is and what he looks like. And do not know what the angels and the animals in the Bible look like .

[@throckmortensnivel2850]

About the genealogy of the bible. Is that observational science, or historical science? Are the six days of creation observational science, or historical science? When evidence of a homicide is gathered, and someone is sent to prison for life, or sentenced to death for the crime, is that observational science, or historical science? You make a grand distinction between the two, but you don't follow it yourself. You are willing to accept the historical science of the bible, but not the historical science of radiometric dating, for instance. Sorry, but you can't have it both ways. If historical science is unreliable, then the bible is unreliable.

[@richardgregory3684]

Espescially as there's no actual evidence for most f the bible.

[@AI2789crg]

They are not saying historical science is not logical, they are saying the old earth, billions of years conclusion by evolutionists is an incorrect interpretation of the historical evidence.

[@AI2789crg]

@@richardgregory3684 no geological discovery has ever disproved anything in the Old Testament, but plenty of geological discoveries have confirmed things written in the Old Testament.

[@throckmortensnivel2850]

@@AI2789crg I don't think so. All of the videos I've seen say that radiometric dating is just wrong. So they're just ignoring evidence. By the way, the age of the earth is not a conclusion of evolutionists. It is a conclusion of geologists and physicists. Biology doesn't deal with the age of the earth except tangentially. Another question is why they make that distinction between observational evidence and "historical" evidence?

[@richardgregory3684]

@@AI2789crg Such as? Do give examples of how geological discoveries cinfirm earth (and of course, the whol euniverse too) was conjured into existance a few thousand years ago by an invisible magic wizard. Or hw about some examples of geological evidence that four thousand years ago the entire earth was covered in water more than five miles deep.

[@ThomasClementsRVA]

Amen 🙏🙏🙏 Primordial Soup 🍲 - What a joke 💯💯💯

[@katamas832]

You haven't even the slightest clue about Abiogenesis.

[@HS-zk5nn]

exactly

[@Gek1177]

Do you not believe that the Ancient Earth had oceans?

[@crusader333ad]

@@katamas832-abiogenesis is easily disproven. I’ll change my mind if you can tell me just how one tiny strand of a glucose polymer SPONTANEOUSLY formed in a prebiotic earth. Can you do it??

[@katamas832]

@@crusader333ad Why glucose? There are several types of sugars already explained by Abiogenesis. It's funny how ya'll always do this "do this ONE SPECIFIC THING and then I'll believe!" like this one experiment proves anything beyond glucose being able to form naturally. I am certain, that you would not change your mind.