Are the Georgia Bulldogs a College Football BLUE BLOOD? | Kirby Smart Hunting Another National Title

Subscribe to On3! ⬇️
kzbin.info?sub_confirmati...
Welcome to On3 | The best of college football and recruiting
www.on3.com/
Follow J.D. PicKell on Twitter: / jdpickell
Follow J.D. PicKell on Instagram: / jdpickell
Listen to The Hard Count on podcast!
Spotify 🎧 : open.spotify.com/show/5Muz6cW...
Apple🍎: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Follow us on Twitter
/ on3sports
Follow us on Instagram
on3?hl=en
Like/Follow us on Facebook
/ on3sports

[@truedawg1339]

Among FBS teams, Georgia ranks 9th in all time wins. However, they rank 4th in total wins over the last 50 years. Georgia also ranks second in all time bowl game wins, 11th in total weeks ranked by the AP and have the 10th most NFL draft picks produced. They also have 2 Heisman trophy winners, including, arguably the greatest College Football player in history in Herschel Walker. Finally, they have 4 National Championships and could rightfully claim a fifth (1946) but refuse to. Three of those National Championships have come over the last 50 years. That puts them ahead Blue Blood programs like Ohio State, Texas, Michigan and Notre Dame during this period. The story of College Football could not be fully written without the University of Georgia. They are, without a doubt, a true Blue Blood of College Football. Go Dawgs!!!

[@wireroom7939]

Aye trudawg... dont b so truthful 😂😂💯 We r dawgnation😎🍺

[@southeastdaygo6193]

OSU has won 3 in the last 50 years with 4 more unclaimed titles. OSU has played in 5 Natty's since 2002. 41 conference championships to UGA 17 conference championships how does that put UGA ahead of OSU? 8 Natty's to 4🤔🤷🏾‍♂️. UGA is a great program but knock it off.

[@truedawg1339]

@@southeastdaygo6193 OSU has won 2 in the past 50 years, period. I'd love to hear about these unclaimed titles. OSU fans and their delusion. Your last three titles have been in 1970, 2002 and 2014. As far as conference titles, that is simply because you play in the weak Big Ten. It is a conference that historically, has been a two pony show. Add to that the fact that Michigan took about 15 years off this century made it very easy for OSU to win 11 big Ten titles in that span. In the past 50 years, Georgia has more total wins and more National titles than OSU, period. We have also beaten your ass twice in bowl games. Never lost to you as a matter of fact. Nearly every time you play for a championship against the SEC, you lose. The lone outlier occurred in 2014. Every other time, whether it's Florida, LSU, Alabama or the Dawgs, you lose. One thing I can say about OSU and their fanbase: If I could buy them for what they are worth and sell them for what they think they are worth, I'd be a rich man.

[@southeastdaygo6193]

@@truedawg1339 Wow cool bs narrative. It doesn't change the fact that OSU has tripled UGA in Natty appearances alone. Never met such an arrogant fan base that until 2018 hasn't really done anything worth talking about. I lived in ATL on and off since 2004 and I saw them lose to Boise St. OSU would never!

[@truedawg1339]

@@southeastdaygo6193 I wouldn't agree with that. In 2012 we played Alabama in the SEC championship game. Whoever won played Notre Dame for the natty. Everyone knew whoever won would beat Notre Dame. I would say that counted, at least indirectly, as playing for the NC. It wasn't as easy to get to the game in the SEC as it was in the weak Big Ten. Besides, playing for ain't the same as winning.

[@ryancasper2506]

Georgia has played the most games against LEGACY top 25 teams all time. Has the 3rd most wins against those teams all time and the 7th highest win percentage against. The reason this matters is to show that some teams(OSU,USC) actually drop win percentage substantially against those teams, verifying that they have inflated stats against lesser than competition.

[@brandonlollis1506]

Y’all better get on the wagon Kirby ain’t going nowhere!! Go dawgs!!!!!

[@reddpatriot2887]

They’ve got 4 National Championships, 2 Heisman trophy winners and have been relevant for the last 50 years, so yeah they are definitely a blue blood

[@WORLDWIDESOCAL9]

no they arent

[@imadominate]

@@WORLDWIDESOCAL9 great argument.

[@WORLDWIDESOCAL9]

@@imadominate everybody knows UGA isn't on the level of USC, ND, OU, BAMA, OHIO STATE

[@truedawg1339]

@@WORLDWIDESOCAL9 No, they really don't.

[@dairyair5371]

@@WORLDWIDESOCAL9They would have to get a lot worse to be on par with those teams. The Dawgs beat every one of those teams.

[@tompiper1480]

Georgia is a definite Blue Blood in College Football

[@southeastdaygo6193]

They are now with those 2 natty wins.

[@truedawg1339]

@@southeastdaygo6193 We were before. Nattys aren't everything.

[@southeastdaygo6193]

@@truedawg1339 I know they're not but to act as if UGA is somehow a better program than OSU man knock it off. Yes they had recent success but they're not OSU.

[@TheMCJ2011]

@@southeastdaygo6193 Find where anyone said anything about OSU in this thread? You seem insecure bringing them up out of nowhere lol

[@akjdhajkdjhaghjkadh9804]

theyre actually not even close. but will they be by the time kirby is gone? definitely

[@johnfridayxiii8455]

They brand new winners in 2021. They have had a dominant 2- 3 year run in CFB. It's more of the Kirby Smart era than blue blood.

[@truedawg1339]

Georgia has the fourth most wins in the last 50 years. 9th most all time. Not sure how you get to the conclusion this is a Kirby Smart thing.

[@jagan17a]

​@truedawg1339 Don't mind him. He's one of those casuals who only knows the team that won the national championship, and that's it. UGA has been relevant since 2000. They were down in the 90s. They were relevant prior to that since the 40s.

[@user-lu1dm5sf6o]

​@@jagan17aIts true tho bruh 😂 bama and OSU ar e blue bloods they been good for more than a decade plus in the 2000's Georgia era started in 2021

[@robd1811]

we need to come up with a definition of what a blue blood is as college football fans

[@krowking123]

If the story of college football can’t be written without including your program’s name in the discussion you’re a Blueblood program in my eyes

[@robd1811]

@@krowking123 i agree with the sentiment 100% the only problem is it is subjective as all hell you could have a legit argument on who to include in the story etc based on biases .

[@SurferRC]

@@robd1811so true, hard to mention college football and never mention Bobby Bowden and 40 straight bowl invites in the AP era, multiple heismans multiple nattys, being DBU…. But im not sure FSU is a blue blood since they are relatively new compared to Michigan or others with decades more of existence.

[@robd1811]

@@SurferRC exactly like take florida for example all of their accomplishments come from the time period of 1990 to 2008 all of their conference titles and national championships and 2 of their 3 heismans..... a lot of people who were apart of the 90s and 00s would consider them blue bloods but how can you consider a program a blue blood where if you take away an 18-19 season stretch out of the 130+ seasons of CFB they have no accomplishments... of course though hard to not include florida in the "story of college football" so a lot of people include them as a blue blood. I like a much more exclusionary historical view of what a blue blood is. I think you need to be in the top 10 list for multiple catagories to be considered a blue blood. Those catagories are as follows...... all time wins, all time winning percentage, all time national championship list, how many bowl games have you been too, bowl game record, how many heisman winners have you had, how many weeks you have been in the AP poll, and how many weeks have you been number 1 in the AP poll............. that is 8 catagories you need to be top 10 in atleast three of those catagories to be considered a blue blood in my opinion. that is my opinion i know people will disagree but if you disagree i challenge you to come up with an OBJECTIVE way to MEASURE what a blue blood is not just "are they in the story of college football?" that is super subjective and while i agree with the sentiment it isn't an accurate way to say who is a blue blood or not.

[@ralphsims6997]

The answer is YES…..that is not an opinion

[@akjdhajkdjhaghjkadh9804]

theyre actually not even close. but will they be by the time kirby is gone? definitely

[@ralphsims6997]

@@akjdhajkdjhaghjkadh9804 how do you figure they “aren’t even close”????

[@marcelstewart9156]

@@akjdhajkdjhaghjkadh9804your chatting their a blue blood ydk what “Blue Blood” means

[@SurferRC]

@@marcelstewart9156blue blood is subjective. Like when a new named generation begins or ends

[@ammoniawilder4451]

I could care less to be honest with you. And this is why. Take Alabama and set them aside. If your blue bloods are Ohio st Texas usc etc… if that means being a blue blood is winning 2 natties in 55 years, or your last being from ‘05 or ‘03 and y’all haven’t done shit since? You can have that title. We’ll just take THE title. Go dawgs

[@trevadon7033]

Excellent video

[@kevinchavis2755]

Georgia isn’t a true top tier blue blood all time but the repeat of national titles, constant contention, and potential since Kirby has been there puts Georgia at a modern blue blood status and has a chance to elevate to a true tier 1 blue blood all time

[@marcelstewart9156]

They a blue blood my guy

[@TheMCJ2011]

No Georgia is not a traditional blue blood. And they don’t have to be. There are only 8 traditional blue bloods in cfb. As long as UGA keeps winning titles I can promise you nobody in Dawg Nation is losing any sleep over whether or not other fanbases consider us one either 😂

[@truedawg1339]

There are only six? Says who? I firmly disagree and listed my reasons above. I suppose you could make an argument that only the six teams that were the most dominate before 1940 could be counted as Blue Bloods but that view, is certainly not mine.

[@TheMCJ2011]

@@truedawg1339 Not sure how you could see the number 8 and your brain compute ‘six’, but ok I guess… lol

[@truedawg1339]

@@TheMCJ2011 Yeah, I don't know either. Just made a mistake I guess, but my points still remain valid.

[@deloachapproach4273]

@@TheMCJ2011 Says the only one who has never made a mistake? It must be tough living with such a lofty individual.

[@TheMCJ2011]

@@deloachapproach4273 If that’s what you got from my comment then ok 😂

[@ericdraven9103]

For All of you "new" Georgia Fans. Georgia is with out a doubt a Blueblood. Georgia had a team go fight and win a war in 1944 and came back and won a national title. They don't claim make believe titles like others. We don't need to be "validation" from casual fans. Georgia earned it. Go Dawgs!!!

[@truedawg1339]

Georgia should claim the 1946 National Championship. They were the only unbeaten team that won their bowl game that year.

[@salbrunetti5020]

If that we're the case you would have to put Minnesota in there and we all know there not, but let's have this conversation again after this decade Go Dawgs! Thanks for keeping it real

[@cKINGovAFRIKA]

How many top 15 finishes does minnesota have in the last 40 yrs

[@porterosbournejr.5083]

Yes they are. Only Bama has more SEC championships and Georgia has just as many national championships as Texas. LSU is a blue blood too.

[@austinloughran3277]

LSU is not a blue blood…come on. Let’s just have everyone at the table. Throw FSU and Miami in there while you’re at it. Stop the madness

[@akjdhajkdjhaghjkadh9804]

cause texas aint a blue blood either

[@stacymoreland5541]

Georgia is definitely a blue blood.

[@truedawg1339]

Without a doubt. Anyone, who actually knows CFB history, would have to agree. Go Dawgs!!!

[@austinloughran3277]

@@truedawg1339 wrong

[@truedawg1339]

@@austinloughran3277I've already laid out my reasons in a factual manner. Saying "wrong" doesn't just make the facts go away.

[@austinloughran3277]

@@truedawg1339 the fact that you guys only have 4 Nattys doesn’t go way either

[@truedawg1339]

@@austinloughran3277 Well you better tell Texas they are no longer a Blue Blood.

[@foxbodyblues6709]

Georgia has always been good. But it took circumstances not to be repeated to get them a Natty: UGA and Michigan clearly benefitted the most from the CVD extra eligibility. They were uniquely positioned with many many OL and DL upperclassmen. In UGAs case they needed a 25 y/o QB (with a successful pro OC there only the years the QB was there) and 24 year old D linemen (plural) that were key contributors to add on top of their usual stockpile of them.

[@jamescarter2059]

As a Georgia fan I see a uga helmet but as a none I see texas bama and michigan and osu then uga as of late

[@mikehancho2082]

For decades Georgia has been a relatively consistent winning program. I think Blue Bloods are defined by eras. It’s true Yale and Harvard aren’t going to be competing for Nattys, neither is Nebraska. For the modern era; Yes, Georgia is a blue blood.

[@classiccitydawg90]

Josh, they gone drag you

[@nmomars3689]

Yes UGA needs 5stars but they will and can develop a 3star into a 5star also

[@WTLowery82]

Josh? LOL!

[@TheMCJ2011]

Pate State strikes again 😂

[@truedawg1339]

@@TheMCJ2011 The Dawgs would stomp the Freights!!!

[@ChickenBoneNews]

Go Georgia Bulldogs from Augusta Georgia 🏈🏈🏈

[@deloachapproach4273]

Are you sure you are from Augusta, CBN? Hello from Graniteville! GO DAWGS, a TrueBlueBlood!

[@justinschram]

Regardless of what people's opinions are now, I will be very shocked if Georgia isn't considered a blue blood by the time the Kirby era ends. Kirby will probably win 2-3 more national championships and maybe more if he doesn't go to the NFL or retires early.

[@Isaiah88p]

UGA is amazing right now. Top dowgz right now and probably for awhile. BUT BlueBlood is about through out history. If your not in the top 10 winning programs of all time then your not in the conversation, point blank. Certified Blue Bloods are the top five. 6-10 belong at the table.

[@greggalton3331]

Harvard and Yale are in the top 10 for all time wins lol and Georgia is 11th so that’s a god awful criteria unless you are going to argue yale and Harvard being blue bloods in college football.

[@Isaiah88p]

@@greggalton3331 clearly it’s D1 power 5. UGA can have a seat at the table.

[@truedawg1339]

Among FBS teams, Georgia ranks 9th in all time wins with 881.

[@Digitalsapien]

Spewing ignorant nonsense is unbecoming. By your own definition UGA is a blue blood genius.

[@jamescarter2059]

I expect georgia and krby to win at least 4 more titles before he retires

[@austinloughran3277]

No not yet

[@truedawg1339]

Wrong. Have always been.

[@austinloughran3277]

@@truedawg1339 how? Do your homework and look at the history

[@deloachapproach4273]

@@austinloughran3277 truedawg used something you seem to lack - the ability to reason. This he did by looking at history.

[@austinloughran3277]

@@deloachapproach4273 4 Nattys doesn’t make you a Blue blood…why do you think they came out with this video? Bc it’s in question. How is that reasoning

[@truedawg1339]

@@austinloughran3277 Well how many Nattys do you need for Blue Blood status? Texas "only" has 4 yet they are considered a Blue Blood by most. What about 5 like Nebraska. Is that your magic number? Please tell me. Lastly, Georgia's status as a Blue Blood is only questioned by people who don't know CFB history.

[@marlon8429]

I’m just here for the comments

[@akjdhajkdjhaghjkadh9804]

historically, no. eventually probably

[@jtwithit5710]

Who cares.....blue blood or not they are about to dominate college football for a while.

[@jmjones7897]

Josh is high.

[@kenlemmond673]

Blue Blood status is completely irrelevant. At least when you count teams of past decades. What IS relevant then? Who is THE powerhouse team of the current college football landscape? It has pretty much been the consensus opinion that Alabama has been the #1 team in college football for the last decade plus going back to say 2000! The Decades of the Dawgs began Against Clemson in the opening game of the 2021 season. Since then Georgia has lost 2 games to the same team, the most recent by 3 points. They have back-to-back National Championships as well as back-to-back scoring records for bowl games established against TCU and Florida State! Two out of three in hand. Will they go three out of four? DOD, year 4! It's on!!!

[@brenthenry4211]

Kirby ain't going anywhere and he's the best active coach hands down! Go Dawgs

[@RobertThames-zone6]

#GODAWGS #KINGKIRBY

[@dave4708]

Does it matter. I'm a Dawg fan, but if you compare to Bama then no.

[@dvelilla]

Bro! Seriously?

[@SovereignInvestments]

How many Heisman's does Georgia have? How many natty's do they have? How long has Georgia been winning at an elite level? And you better not say Mark Richt. How many great players does Georgia pump out every year and we're not talking recently. Is Georgia an NFL factory longstanding not recently I mean in the 80's 90's and 2000's? How many bowls championships does Georgia have in their case? Bluebloods mean long, long, long history not just some recent dominant performances. SMH

[@truedawg1339]

Georgia is 9th all time in wins(881). They have the second most Bowl wins all time(38) trailing only Alabama's 45 bowl wins.

[@SovereignInvestments]

@truedawg1339 OK, how many heismans? Have they been pumping NFL talent since the 80's at least. Elite dominant winning not just a long stretch of just winning. Yall Mark richt days was brutal. Bruh. Georgia has just recently been elite with coach smart. Georgia is not known for their elite offenses. For a long time yall was just running pro style offenses.

[@truedawg1339]

@@SovereignInvestments Georgia ranks 10th in all time NFL draft picks produced with 371, trailing number 9 Florida by 2 (373). It is pretty tightly bunched till you get to number three. The number five team, Alabama has 401 NFL draft picks produced. Nobody is near the top two. 1) Notre Dame 525 and 2) USC with 524.

[@truedawg1339]

@@SovereignInvestments Georgia has two Heisman winners, Frank Sinkwich and Herschel Walker. That ranks them 13th all time. The Fact that Herschel, is widely regarded as the best player in CFB history means extra points. Or at least it should.

[@SovereignInvestments]

@truedawg1339 Who? Frank sandwich? 😂 I've never heard of him. This is the first I've heard of him. I'm hungry now. A sandwich sounds good right now.

[@Osei_Bean_8ryant]

Before Kirby UGA had everything you need to be a blue blood except championships. Now after back to back championships & 3 straight undefeated regular seasons. Clearly a blue blood

[@user-eg3ck8jm8g]

They’re not a blue blood. might be in the future they will be, but not right now.

[@mikeestes1076]

what? they are the only team to win a back to back national Titles in the 4 team playoff era .. yes they are blue bloods.

[@Digitalsapien]

If UGA is not a blue blood right now, no team will ever reach blue blood status again, which renders the entire point of calling any team a blue blood obsolete. UGA is a blue blood. They are going to win more Natties in the next decade than the rest of CFB combined.

[@dylandean5043]

Hell no.

[@SurferRC]

Blue blood does not have an agreed upon definition, so its all opinion who is and who isnt.

[@angelocerrato8425]

I don't give a s*** about my team being a blue blood all I enjoy is a championships while they're coming in

[@dondondawg1]

UGA...always on ya'lls mind..lol...don't you just hate it

[@SovereignInvestments]

Georgia ain't no blueblood, just because you win a couple of natty's don't make you a blueblood.

[@truedawg1339]

We are a blue blood. We have a rich history since 1892.

[@SovereignInvestments]

@truedawg1339 Sorry, no, yall not homie. Not near it.

[@SovereignInvestments]

@truedawg1339 Stop riding Kirby smart elite success. It goes beyond just him. No other coach beyond Kirby smart ran an elite program.

[@truedawg1339]

@@SovereignInvestments That's just ridiculous and show a lack of knowledge about football history.

[@truedawg1339]

@@SovereignInvestments You obviously know little about which you speak.

[@Osei_Bean_8ryant]

Josh needs to give me his plugs number

[@lysoloperator]

UGA will take Nebraska’s place if they are able to keep Kirby for another 8 years.

[@truedawg1339]

UGA already has it's place as a Blue Blood. So does Nebraska.

[@lysoloperator]

@@truedawg1339 agree to disagree. UGA is very close and on the fringe of being one. UGA wins another title and gets to 910+ wins in two or so seasons they’ll have a legit case to be.

[@truedawg1339]

@@lysoloperator That's fine. You are certainly entitled to your opinion. I will just leave it at this: Georgia has more wins than USC and just as many National Championships (4) as Texas. Both of those teams are unquestioned Blue Bloods.

[@Digitalsapien]

UGA has already far surpassed Nebraska. They're not even in the same conversation.

[@lysoloperator]

@@Digitalsapien historically Nebraska had one more title and more wins. Again, UGA is on the fringe of beating those teams out, and if Kirby stays they will easily

[@consciousm1nd]

Huge dawg fans. Love them to death. UGA isn’t a blue blood 🤷🏽‍♂️ We’re dominating RIGHT NOW. But we don’t have a bunch of championships throughout time. That’s gotta be part of the criteria. Let’s be honest here… Nebraska is a blue blood and they’re in the TOILET. Who tf cares if you’re a blue blood…. It really doesn’t mean anything 😂

[@truedawg1339]

UGA is a Blue Blood. I listed my reasons above. I'm not sure what you're criteria is. Listening to your logic I would have to assume you include Michigan as a Blue Blood. Michigan claims, without much proof, 12 National Championships. Yet 8 of those championships claimed, were before 1935. Before the AP poll even existed. Some of those championships are dubious at best. You also claim Nebraska as a Blue Blood, which they are, but they only have 5 National Championships and three of those were won in the 90s. So I don't believe Nebraska meets your "bunch of championships throughout time" criteria. It sounds like you believe that only the five or six teams that were the most dominate before 1940 and Nebraska, count as Blue Bloods to you. That certainly isn't my view. My view is simply this: are they one of the handful of greatest teams over the history of College Football. Georgia is, and they are a Blue Blood.

[@consciousm1nd]

@@truedawg1339 that's your opinion... youre more than welcome to have that... I also have mine. I think UGA is a GREAT team right now. I'm a HUGE UGA fan... the facts still remain... we aren't a blue blood. It also doesn't matter if you are a blue blood or not today. Very competitive teams today aren't blue bloods. You're making a ton of speculations based on a few sentences buddy... You seem very passionate about this so good on you... but don't create an argument based on things that weren't said at all... Lets see how UGA stacks up to teams that most consider blue bloods.... Nebraska does only 5 titles... They also have 46 conference championships, 3 heismans, and is 9th all time in total wins which is all more than UGA claims. Michigan is 1st in all time wins, has 45 conference championships, 12 titles, and 3 heismans... ALL MORE THAN UGA OSU 3rd all time in wins, 41 conference championships, 8 titles, and 7 heismans... ALL MORE THAN UGA Bama 2nd all time in wins, 18 titles, 34 conference championships, and 4 titles... ALL MORE THAN UGA ND T-4th in all time wins, 11 titles and 7 heismans... ALL MORE THAN UGA Texas T-4th in all time wins, 4 titles, 33 conference championships, and 2 heismans are pretty close to UGA... But 33 conference championships and all time wins record would give them that classification as a blue blood to me. Oklahoma 6th in all time wins, 7 titles, 50 conference championships, 7 heismans.... ALL MORE THAN UGA Like I said I love UGA! But I also can look at where it stacks up to other programs throughout time and see that we just don't have the same domination as other programs. UGA's 11th all time in wins, 4 titles, 16 conference championships, and 2 heismans are great, but our dominance is pretty new with Kirby coming to town... Even with unclaimed natties we would fall short to other blue bloods. I'd say UGA is comfortably on top as a "New Blood." UGA has been one of the most consistent programs in history... No doubt or argument there... but if we're comparing ourselves to true bonafide blue bloods... we just aren't that.

[@truedawg1339]

@@consciousm1nd Okay, don't say you have your opinion and then say it's a fact. Further, what facts you do present are flawed. Georgia is 9th in all time wins and Nebraska is 8th.among FBS schools. Conference Championships mean nothing unless you consider the conference. Of Oklahomas 50 conference titles 5 were won in the Big Six, 12 in the Big Seven and 16 in the Big Eight. Same with Nebraska and their 12 Missouri Valley Conference titles. That is not the SEC, where the only program that has more titles than Georgia is Alabama. Michigan claims, without much proof, 12 National Championships. Yet 8 of those championships claimed, were before 1935. Before the AP poll even existed. Some of those championships are dubious at best. The next two were won before 1950. Even more to the point is the fact that over the last 75 years, Michigan has won 1 National title(2023) and split one in 1998. When it comes to both Ohio state and Michigan conference titles, the Big Ten has historically been a two team race. Not so in the SEC. Our National Championships are equal to Texas and one below Nebraska. Over the past 50 years we have the 4th best record in CFB and more National Championships than Ohio State, Michigan,, and Notre Dame. Lastly, I never claimed those teams weren't Blue Bloods. I just claimed we are as well. This is my opinion. My one step further opinion states your opinion is uneducated, lacks context and is probably that of a Florida fan. Not a fact, just an opinion. See the difference?

[@TheMCJ2011]

Facts bro so many casuals are obsessed with this ‘blue blood’ title as if it prevents you from winning titles. It’s just an attempt at elitism from people who like to use cfb as a weird form of escapism.

[@truedawg1339]

@@TheMCJ2011I would say it is more of a matter of respect and fake narratives. Let's say Georgia won the titles in 2012 and 2017. Are we even having this discussion? Two win wouldn't have changed the long history of the program very much but it would change perception immensely. Being in the top ten in all time wins and bowl game wins should mean something. Our history is rich. Nothing wrong with telling people about it.

[@TY-fm8lj]

Someone should tell Josh to stop watching football

[@dylandean5043]

Usc, Ou, texas, bama, notredame, nebraska, ohiost. Thats it.

[@SurferRC]

No michigan?

[@SovereignInvestments]

J.D. your just a homer. Thats why you're saying this.

[@TheMCJ2011]

He’s not even from Georgia so try again. You’re just a hater lol

[@SovereignInvestments]

@@TheMCJ2011 Am I? 😂

[@TheMCJ2011]

@@SovereignInvestments yep 😂

[@truedawg1339]

@@SovereignInvestments You're something. I have laid out the historical reasons Georgia is a Blue Blood numerous times on this board. Are they the top program? No. But we do belong at that table.

[@SovereignInvestments]

@truedawg1339 Bruh, yall still have years and years to go, You all only have 3 natty's under your belts. That's it. Real elite bluebloods have 5-6 or more.

[@JMoneyMan86]

UGA is not a blue blood. You have to have been dominating for a century to claim thst tittle Buddy. The UGA Koolaid is making it's rounds. So what's make UGA a blueblood if you believe thst then Clemson is too😂

[@truedawg1339]

Is Michigan a Blue Blood?

[@JMoneyMan86]

@@truedawg1339 According to the standards yes do I agree with it no. A lot of those tittles came against plumbers

[@truedawg1339]

@@JMoneyMan86 I mentioned Michigan for a reason. Michigan claims, without much proof, 12 National Championships. Yet 8 of those championships claimed, were before 1935. Before the AP poll even existed. Some of those championships are dubious at best. The next two were won before 1950. Even more to the point is the fact that over the last 75 years, Michigan has won 1 National title(2023) and split one in 1998. That is not "dominating for a century" yet you gave them Blue Blood status. I listed my reason for saying Georgia is a Blue Blood above and I stand by them.

[@JMoneyMan86]

@@truedawg1339 Let me ask you this. Is Alabama a blueblood ‼️🤣🤔

[@truedawg1339]

@@JMoneyMan86 Of course. They are also directly the reason Georgia is stuck at 4 National Championships and not 7.

[@SovereignInvestments]

Bluebloods consist of Heisman's, natty's, a long resume of great players, a long history and years and years of winning not just a couple of years. Georgia wasn't doing it in the 80's 90's nor 2000's. Teams that are true to it not new to it.

[@truedawg1339]

"Georgia wasn't doing it in the 80's 90's nor 2000's". You are aware that Georgia won the Natty in 1980 right? Are you aware that we played for one in 1982? We also played for one in 2012 and 2017. We have 2 Heisman winners, one of which is, arguably, the greatest CFB player of all time. Are you aware that we have the 9th best record of all time and the 4th best record of the last 50 years? Asking for a friend.

[@SovereignInvestments]

@truedawg1339 You funny 😂 but a lot of people don't crown georgia a blueblood, yet a matter of fact, they laugh when this topic comes up. Now the run they on is impressive, but don't thump your chest yet and say blueblood, stop it.

[@truedawg1339]

@@SovereignInvestments You, who applies no logic when discussing these topics, of which you know little, should stop it. I obviously know more about CFB history than you so why do you even try to argue? You simply don't have a clue what you're talking about.

[@calvinpham3857]

If they keep doing what they’re doing they will be blue bloods. U still have to give it a few more years. Alabama was blue blood before saban came in… but if they weren’t saban definitely make them a blue blood for the last 17 years

[@SurferRC]

So fsu is a blue blood then? They meet that criteria

[@rocker555555]

Josh isn't that bright. Ask any NFL scout where they head first to scout players they know will produce for them- It's in Athens Ga.