Aristotle and Aquinas on Morality

Рет қаралды 4,289

Sanctus

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 35

@SanctusApologetics 6 ай бұрын

God bless, submit to Christ.

@JandroD 6 ай бұрын

I actually learned a lot from this. I thank you, so much.

@micheal9301 6 ай бұрын

Outstanding Video. God bless

@SanctusApologetics 6 ай бұрын

Thank you! God bless as well.

@existential_o 6 ай бұрын

W privation theory

@icekingboy 6 ай бұрын

great video

@sandwicheater3635 3 ай бұрын

Nice Video. Do you write your scripts on your own?

@Thanya569 4 ай бұрын

Good video thank u

@JScholastic 6 ай бұрын

@jungefrau 3 ай бұрын

Schopenhauer has a completely different take on evil & I think a more pragmatic view.

@velkyn1 6 ай бұрын

No objective morality. Christian morality is demonstrably subjective, with each inventing a list of morals they claim their god wants, and yet the poor dears can't show that their god merely exists, much less agrees with them. They also have the problem that they must insist that their god doesn't have to follow these supposedly "objective" morals since they have to invent excuses why it is okay for this god to commit genocide, to kill people for the actions of others, etc. This makes their morality subjective to who someone is. it also shows their morality is little more than might equals right. It's no surprise, that Aristotle and Aquinas are wrong again, and morality is simply a human invention. It is subjective and that means we can toss the hate and ignorance from the bible. There are some common morals, but that is simply because we are humans and we value civilization. Nothing at all shows that morality is objective.

@SanctusApologetics 6 ай бұрын

You refuted nothing in the video, you just asserted that it was wrong without any justification. Also notice how I didn’t even mention the Bible and still demonstrated objective morality, yet you strawmanned the whole video.

@velkyn1 6 ай бұрын

@@SanctusApologetics Quite a lovely lie, SA. Unsuprisingly, i showed how your morality is no more objective than mine, and that not one christian can show that their god exists or that their morality is from it. I know you didn't mention the bible, since it shows how christian morality fails too. You did not show that morality is objective at all. As usual, you can't even show that any "metaphysical principles" merely exist. Your baseless presupposition destroys your argument. Your nonsense about "privation" is entertaining since you christians can't even agree on what "good" is.

@velkyn1 6 ай бұрын

@@SanctusApologetics Unsurprisingly, I have refuted the lies in this video. I have shown how christian morality is no more objective than any other morality and that christians cannot and do not agree on what morals their imagniary friend wants.

@igorlopes7589 5 ай бұрын

Disagreement about what is moral or immoral doesn't mean morality is subjective

@velkyn1 5 ай бұрын

@@igorlopes7589 Actually it does, since not a single one of you cultists can show that any morality is objective. Go ahead, igor, show that morality is objective and show which one is the objective one. Surely you can, right? "Disagreement about what is moral or immoral doesn't mean morality is subjective"