Rethinking Reality: Journey to the Extreme

[@darrylwillard2419]

Really great and interesting talk.

[@rachendrapyakurel9911]

Incredible talk by a smart woman. Loved it!

[@rachendrapyakurel9911]

I only have one query and that's how would blackholes cut from the universe when it also radiates energy? After all, matter and energy are like two sides of the same coin.

[@vjnt1star]

great talk. it is september now did they see the croissant and confirmed the neutron stars with free quarks ?

[@soundwave8781]

You'd probably want to keep those in zip-loc baggies instead of buckets.

[@davidwilkie9551]

Extremes, are not limits? Measuring the extremes of sampling rates of a spectrum for defining probability with available technology is the practice of science, and imagining the limits of the spectrum is the science of mathematics.

[@alexandregm8703]

I'm watching it from Brazil and I'm not a physicist

[@lucasmatteis]

Pome Luthor o mesmo aqui amigo!

[@H3RB42O]

mic is too close

[@gregroppo5500]

Dear Feryal, If by some crazy chance you are not married, please write to me - you are amazing...! If you are married, please discard this message and APOLOGIZE to your husband😎 You are genuinely gifted

[@mycount64]

I don't have the math my thoughts are it would not be quarks as they appear in protons and neutrons as they would not be bound together and require the usual 3 some rules apply so some other rules and form of quark would emerge out of the process... Just my armchair physics thought.

[@namelastname4077]

AW Crowe speak english, fuckface

[@educatedmanholecoverbyrich8890]

Then why are YOU not giving the lecture? By the way, I notice that English is not your first language, I can see that clearly. Kindergarten is in another room, go there, this room is for adults only.

[@user-wo8bg5lt3o]

The Anunnaki created this simulated universe using the ME devices. Link: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fHLUYqCnnpWmmcU

[@s.w.chandler6082]

Yum. Neutron soup.

[@baogiangsongque5507]

""6- .- Einstein has been wrong since he presented his papers."". how can you say??? it should said like this: Einstein has been right since he presented his papers about theories of general relative=general of general scopic =our reality world but Einstein almost (not absolutely) has been wrong since he presented his papers about universe scale=universe scopic dimension or nano scopic dimension=non-atom structure dimension due we not yet systematic, catergorizimatic, levelizamatic formal form in term of textbook. more over, cause limited of instrument and lack of information data that yield "handicap science". then why our civilization got "handicap science"?? simple because it bases on our own wish and want and wonderful... not base on the thing by itself. for example if you ask a question that question relative to someone s' field then you got 99% that someone will give many answer as you want due to "show up and professional=need food to survival=got job" and maybe 1% say "i dont know or i know little bit". from that point knowledge has been bias and turn far away from the true=mystery. No fundamental principle of basic of universe has been reveal or answer yet due our language can not be described. for example: what color of apple?? abc song said "apple is green". or someone said "apple is red". nobody have real answer cause that too simple then after thousand year it become a fact. or you need to as least over 1001 paper to describe "its color". if you indifferent view of different wave of light then what is it color? if no light or only infra light then what is it color? we cannot find the answer because it really a non-sense to make and benefit our interesting but it deeply is a part of fundamental principle of basic of universe. anyone understand this??? we separate dimension of space for easier to understand but space by itself is unique trinity. cosmos scopic and gereral scopic and nano scopic in normal language way or space = atom structure + non atom structure. atom structure=matter= things=visible=detected....... non atom structure=non matter= dark matter= less mometum particle=invisible= undecteted .....

[@educatedmanholecoverbyrich8890]

I notice that English is not your first language.

[@educatedmanholecoverbyrich8890]

Why on the Devil's good earth did this woman not ask the video operator to refocus the lens? It's not hard.

[@JIMJAMSC]

I disagree.

[@sagealito]

Are you single ? Facebook search m

[@mgsridharanmg]

...so boring lecture...!!!...it's like being again' in pre school Physics class...!!!...she is trying her best to explain what's happening in (material thing) space...!!!she couldn't able to visualise how come space itself existing...!!!who created space itself...(we do understand many act taking place in space)...!!!...what is space itself...!!!...as we possess human consciousness we must have or need to have direct understanding of the stage(where the behaviour of matter acting up on)empty space...than what's happening in Space...!!!

[@Chris-bm5qd]

It's funny that you mention "It's like being again' in pre school". It' pretty clear from your inability to express a coherent thought that you never attended any formal education above a 2nd grade level.

[@namelastname4077]

Sridharan Manampathy your English can has really broken!

[@mgsridharanmg]

...my intention is...if any one honestly questioning ...???the existences of Space itself(how it came into being)...!!!(rather than...happenings in space)...!!!...then there is something extraordinary thing taking place within the questioner...!!!which cannot be explained...only to be experienced...!!!and at the same time have no intention to criticize the above lecture...!!!...:-)

[@mgsridharanmg]

...pre school ...what I ment really was " thablarasta"..."clear the screen "...try to look fresh...from innocence...!!!to open fresh new open fact looking...!!!

[@mgsridharanmg]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/jp7LdnWffqyDi8k

[@williamsterben]

You're a lovely girl, but we'll wait for the physicist to arrive.

[@_John_Sean_Walker]

What do you think the word professor means?