Arma III - Official Community Guide: Jets by Dslyecxi

[@dominikhertle9708]

Funny how a war game for adults actually teaches good information about electromagnetic waves that could be useful to a younger audience. GG

[@furinick]

Arma also teaches about the importance of teamwork and proper planning

[@Dave-us5fq]

Nicolas Sousa prior preparation and planning prevents piss poor performance

[@michaelskinner6212]

it also teaches adults how shit AI can be, just imagine if Bohemia had a few people constantly improving the AI systems since release

[@casparthomas4775]

Arma3 is definitely a great way to get young people into problem solving, team work.

[@TonyEvans96]

had this running in my background. I heard the incoming missile tone and starting spamming my flares

[@Hamadpro12]

lol

[@generalpopcorn6427]

It took me a while to figure out how to find a target, center a camera on that target, engage the laser, lock a bomb on the laser designated target, and then drop the bomb at the right altitude and distance range to hit the target. Now I'm practicing how to do the whole process faster and faster. The first time you drop a laser guided bomb on a target that you are laser designating yourself and watch the bomb make a direct hit is quite satisfying.

[@cobra412uf]

King you have to be joking. Battlefield 4 aircraft game play is just that, gamey. Arma isn't a total flight sim but gives a much better feel without being overly complicated. Some players are not looking for a full flight sim but something fairly close combined with similar ground warfare which is what Arma delivers.

[@sweetballs4742]

+Guybrush Threepwood I was thinking the same thing too :'(

[@jibbymarket]

The only thing different between the a10 in bf4 and the a10 in arma is that the radar lock mechanics

[@daspud]

DCS is a real simulator

[@maxwasacz7875]

That was the best and most descriptive jetsTraining video for the Area 3 franchise game yet. Well done!

[@firerescueowl1536]

10:30 Nice Top Gun reference.

[@Gerwulf97]

That thumbnail is so symbolic. NATO has been turned upside down and CSAT is on the rise but still within NATO's shadow.

[@Vectif]

Never thought of it that way! Interesting perspective

[@chiken6559]

bruh it's just top gun reference

[@Darman0430]

Why the hell does this series switch around to so many channels?

[@ThesynEden]

Honestly flares and chaff are so broken in ArmA, there were so many situations in the video that a heat seeker was following a jet while it was shooting up flares, either the heat seeking tech just jumped up a notch or flares are just there for effects, now im not saying ArmA is a flight sim but coming from DCS to this really makes ArmA feel like its one big Battlefield game, hope they fix it sometime for example look at 7:44

[@KIW3Y]

That is pretty realistic. Modern heat seeking missiles fly as straight as possible to the precalculated flight path of the jet in the moment before the heat signal gets messy. Meaning, that if you don't change your flight path after deploying flares or you activate them too late, the missile will still hit you. The game is set in the year 2030 after all.

[@generalpopcorn6427]

I can consistently shake off missile locks with the countermeasures. There have been a few times when the missile made it right through to my aircraft, but I chalk that up more to my crappy flying into the path of the missile than to a fault of the countermeasures. They do work, despite what the video is showing.

[@LupusAries]

Agreed Kiw3y, that's the first thing you learn in any flight sim is to always combine countermeasures with maneuvres. Chaffs or Flares confuse the missile they don't magically call it onto them, they only buy you time to maneuver to a position where the missile can't intercept you. And there were other tricks, for example if you flew an OCA Strike (Offensive Counter Air Strike=read airfield attack), in Falcon you were always told to come in a slight dive with the engine at idle? Why to cool the engine nozzles making you harder to detect. Add to that copious ammounts of flares to deal with all kinds of Manpads at that low level. Of course try to come in behind a hillside, so they don't know you're there and you get that altitude for a slight dive. At 7:44 he kept flying straight instead of immediately maneuvering, at that short range he should've tried to break into the missile to make the intercept harder. Yes that is just very short time, but you know how fast one starts to react when you're launched upon and have some experience. You hear the warning, and before you even thought about it you have already maneuvered and punched out flares and chaffs. And the DCS Flares were at times said to be a bit broken, aka to strong. The missile flight dynamics in DCS have also been described as lacking by the guy who made the flight dynamics model for the missiles in the F-14 Tomcat addon. Namely the tracking logic and their energy management has come under criticism, namely that they always, even at at long range go maximum turn rate trying to stay on the best intercept course. Which means you can "game" the missiles by doing a continuous barrel roll at 20 nautical miles and the missile will try to keep a lead collision itercept course by maneuvering despite you not generating any real offset. And a real missile would just have a bias (filter) against that where it would compare range to the maneuvres and say, "Hey he's at 20 nautical miles, not generating any offset, I'm just gonna fly straight!" Another problem is that seemingly ED's Rmax definition is one only used by the Russian Air Force, namely that at Rmax the missile stalls when hitting the target, which gives an additional problem in that if another Air Force like the USAF or French Air Force uses a different Rmax definition and you put that Rmax value into your system, you will get invalid results. The Interview: kzbin.info/www/bejne/o5KQdZ6FgKyKpKs As for countermeasures vs Missiles well that has been an tick-tock, some time the missiles are better sometimes the countermeasures are better. In the Falklands war the AIM-9L was very successful and they expected the same in the Gulf War of the improved AIM-9M.....however it was less successful, because flare's had improved.

[@thatfatguyinmcdonaldseatin6389]

Some man pads like the stinger have a gyro thingy so they can see what’s a flare and what’s a plane

[@thatfatguyinmcdonaldseatin6389]

I played dcs and hated it for being too hard as a game but I also played very very unrealistic ones like ace 7 but arma is the best for me it’s in the middle

[@ashcosmo3854]

DCS Flaming cliffs is the arcadey mode if you've checked that out

[@enragedpeanut8203]

whats the key to enter the cam as pilot?

[@Kiyodio]

Control right click, check your field manual for more info

[@marcussardina3889]

Amazing vid but how do you guysget good frames? lol

[@marklavender6380]

Marcus Sardina good pc 😁

[@Schalkdk]

Gr8 Video, Thanks for the time you put into making these!

[@roopesassi4551]

can you make a video how to lock AG missles and AA bc i dont have any clue how to do it

[@KIW3Y]

press t

[@maxvandervoorn1089]

I was disappointed it was not big shaq

[@JeremiahRose]

Is this your video?

[@Kiyo_pz]

No

[@max_scr6530]

How can I activate the cam in the wipeout

[@leadontaste7261]

Ctrl+RMB

[@jointaimbot55]

why did the flares do nothing at kzbin.info/www/bejne/gaGXmGVvgKd9oJI

[@barelmaker]

I know this is old, but if someone wants an answer to this, flares are just to confuse the tracking of an IR missile, you still have to do evasive maneuvers afterwards

[@lukav3509]

all i want is how to make the plane drop the bombs, why is it so difficult my monkey brain cant process it!!

[@is-sam]

I didn't understand a shit from this video, too much theory, not much of actionnable practical info on how to actually fly jets in game. Feels like you're just reading a 100 pages PDF document about arma 3 jets ..

[@aleccross3535]

Its just a simple guide to ArmA III's aerial components. Not necessarily a straight-up virtual flight school

[@clerkmiltom9663]

GRIPEN!!!!

[@DarkSharingan21]

Looks like shit. Battlefield 4 is a better war/jet simulator.

[@DarkSharingan21]

Rip

[@freedomperson1012]

Battlefield 4 isn't even a simulator

[@khornii7513]

Really nigga

[@sweetballs4742]

Errrr.... I think not. First, if you're thinking that you can jump off straight on a T-50, grab your RPG, take out a J-20 in the sky, and go back straight to T-50 like nothing happens and call it a "better jet simulator", then your an absoulte dolt, Clay Jensen. Pretty freaking absolute dolt you are.

[@IlhamDefraN]

troll, dont get his bait guys :)