Artemis Project 1, The New Mission to Return To The Moon

[@InsaneCuriosity]

Hey guys! If you like the video, we would love for you to share it on social networks like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter. You will greatly help the Insane Curiosity community to grow and improve more and more our upcoming content. A big thank you from all of us

[@beadyeyez]

This is really a great time to be alive..especially regarding space exploration. The technology that's available now.. even over 10 years ago.. is remarkable. There will be a number of new revelations and discoveries coming in the near future.

[@DVAFP]

There will be massive floods and migrations all over the world within 10 years

[@70snostalgia]

Wished they'd hurry up. I was born in '65.

[@acwolf65]

If you think about it, there was approximately 10 years between Apollo and the shuttle program.. I’d say they are on track for the next phase of space exploration.

[@mwtrolle]

Cool video as always. Hope we will see a permanent human settlement on the moon soon.

[@CaskillsElliptic]

I enjoyed the video, but caught a few factual errors: The first crewed mission to the surface will be Artemis-3, not Artemis-4. ICPS stands for Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage. The Orion spacecraft had to descope (remove) the land-based landing capability, and reverted to maritime-only. Crew recovery will be as in the Apollo days, conducted with rescue ships.

[@jimshannononsounds]

The earliest launch date I have is February 12th, 2022. That didn't happen. Then it got bumped up to March 12th, now it's April 8th -23rd. I think Covid pressures and geopolitics have side-lined this project for good. Does anyone want to lay odds that after April 23rd, another launch date will be set? The plot thickens.

[@CountArtha]

@@jimshannononsounds It's only a test mission. I wish they'd stop pussyfooting and get on with the rest of the program, because the hype is wasted on a mission that's not much more remarkable than Apollo 4.

[@Emdee5632]

Scheduled launch of Artemis I is at the moment no sooner than June 2022. Probably ''summer of 2022''.' Artemis II (crewed but no landing attempt) is scheduled for 2024, and Artemis III (crewed an they are going for a lunar landing) for 2025.

[@Cre80s]

3:41 I came in to learn about the Artemis mission and wasn't prepared to hear the best, clearest summary of the very nature of the cold war, but there it is.

[@robertduke5458]

Love the video. We need to stop with all the little ships. We need a large spinning space station in space once elon gets the starship going. One in which a full starship can dock inside. A real large massive structure.

[@charlesleonard7734]

It will take time to figure out how to build something so massive but I hope it becomes a reality and we can use it a place to jump into the unknown of space.

[@mm-dw4rr]

I just love everthing "Curious"! Of how there's so much yet untold. ❤

[@davidmacphee8348]

I have doubts about all this Artemis Project All things considered. I hope Starship will be a complete success.

[@mm-dw4rr]

@@davidmacphee8348 Hi brother. I trust you had a good Christmas with family and friends. Are you getting excited about all things space!? 🎁

[@InsaneCuriosity]

Hey M & M , are you Kimberley?

[@InsaneCuriosity]

Merry Christmas David And Kimberley :-)

[@mm-dw4rr]

@@InsaneCuriosity Kim's my baby girl. She's the apple of my eye! How was your Christmas? I imagine you're always busy.

[@justcruisin81]

Can't wait!

[@JynxedKoma]

Too bad it keeps getting delayed because it's "good for business" not to be completed as quickly as possible.

[@amangogna68]

Great video !

[@tokencon]

Great video with current plans for the Artemis mission. What was unclear was the role of Space X and its Lunar Lander?

[@craigmcdonald9206]

Moon buggy gotta have one...

[@lonewolf31337]

Great video.

[@marcozolo3536]

If Artemis is the NASA name of the program for returning to the moon, what's the Martian one called? Or the one for Venus in future.

[@makeitcold6649]

While I'm stoked were going back to the moon permanently, my guess is that the SLS/Orion will fall short of expectations, essentially being an updated Apollo, and the programs success will fall onto SpaceX's plate

[@WorldwideWyatt]

SLS is gonna be a huge success.

[@NavidIsANoob]

SLS will be way more successful than Starship. It's kind of silly that you assume SLS will fail when it's already in the last stages of development while Starship is nowhere near ready to go into orbit even.

[@makeitcold6649]

Keep holding your breath, why are you SLS fanboys? I'm not a Tesla stock owner but Musk gets done in 5-years, where everyone else would be looking at 20+

[@NavidIsANoob]

@@makeitcold6649 Not a fanboy, just a realist. But it is funny to see Musk fanboys claiming that Starship will get to the moon before SLS, while SLS has a launch planned somewhere in the next months while Starship is struggling to keep all its tiles attached on the launchpad.

[@myemail5457]

Just thinking about how much further along they could be without all the stupid wars.

[@herdsire90210]

Rockets were invented in WW2. NASA landed on the moon because of the cold war. Those man that actually landed on the moon probably had a background in the Navy.

[@regolith1350]

This video gets just about everything wrong. Factual errors, wrong names, wrong terminology, bizarre descriptions, and bad math. It’s like a Wikipedia article written by a drunk alien. 1) they didn’t “finally” set a launch date. It had been set a long time ago but pushed back repeatedly. 2) the ICPS is the INTERIM Cryogenic Propulsion Stage, not “PROVISIONAL” as the video repeatedly says. 3) this video attributes all kinds of things to the ICPS that should be attributed to the Orion SERVICE MODULE, not the ICPS, which is the SLS rocket’s upper stage. 4) Artemis 3 will land astronauts on the surface of the moon, not merely go around it 5) the Orion capsule will not launch cubesats or anything at all. The cubesats will be launched from the SLS interstage. Who launches cubesats from a CREW VEHICLE?? 6) it’s Kennedy Space Center, not Kennedy spaceport. And what does “the modernized Kennedy spaceport” even mean?? The video goes on and on like this. It’s endless.

[@ルカ写真撮影]

Let me add some 7) Orion crew capsule wont land on land, it splashes down in the ocean just like Apollo did. 8) The crew capsule doesn’t have air bags or retro rockets, i think he’s confusing Orion with star liner which does land on land with air bags and with the soyuz decent module which uses retro rockets.

[@zebunker]

This whole channel is a content farm. Should be avoided.

[@glitch1182]

The video said, “…will be launched from the modernized spaceport at Kennedy Space Center.” It didn’t refer to any Kennedy spaceport, but I will agree with you that using the adjective “modernized” is strange.

[@UtraVioletDreams]

Yup, this is cool right! There launch date is somewhere in 2022 as mentioned in 01:08. There goal is to achieve this in 2025!

[@RoninX33]

Don't get excited about this until it happens

[@zebunker]

No girls on the moon. Don't ruin the moon too.

[@BigPolskiMan]

Nice

[@jasonpaquette2301]

So mining the Moon's natural resources won't have an effect on the Earth's cycle? Or is it just the Technology? And You know what I mean.

[@mwtrolle]

Didn't know they had revived it, though NASA had decided to go all-in on the lunar starship.

[@ianmathwiz7]

The Lunar Starship is part of the Artemis Program. Its job is to get astronauts from lunar orbit to the lunar surface. The SLS and Orion are still being used to launch from Earth to lunar orbit.

[@NavidIsANoob]

So much misinformation... Starship, so far, is a conceptual part of the Artemis program. SpaceX isn't capable yet to bring anything to the moon. The Artemis project has been in development for years by NASA to bring astronauts and science to the moon again.

[@CountArtha]

The Lunar Starship's job is to transport them from lunar orbit to the surface, and back to lunar orbit. SLS does the rest. This was the plan all along, because the Orion CSM is a lot heavier than the Apollo CSM and can't be launched on the same rocket as the lander.

[@birdwild6661]

can someone tell me if artemis project 1 is succeeded? when artemis project 2 start?

[@dougabrahamsen2952]

How is this a return to the moon without a lander? SLS. Failed before takeoff since it requires boosters for a basic mission profile!

[@darmy9548]

February 2022 that's only like two months away :)

[@Mailman25]

And when will they show us the clear images of the structures on the dark side?

[@philipmcdonagh1094]

We need a star gate not a gate way.

[@olivergrumitt2601]

I should have said “The Americans are much less likely to regard the Artemis programme as worthwhile. Apologies for the error.

[@gonzogeier]

Why I hear always Astronots?

[@dusk-i3m]

9:02 "provide emergency abortion capabilities" Dang, astronauts sure are having it hard up there.

[@Souljourney22]

Lets be real they are really after and investigating the structures on the surface. The natual resources are a second priority in this return to the moon.

[@fightingforthefuture2941]

I thought Artemis 3 is supposed to land people back on the moon

[@Emdee5632]

Artemis III yes. Not Artemis I (uncrewed, just a test flight) or Artemis II ((crewed but no landing attempt).

[@lfroncek]

Elon Musk is going to be sh&t posting from his 4th Mars colony before NASA lands another human being on the Moon.

[@astitva5002]

and then they still use the imperial system to advertise

[@gordonwiessner6327]

No weaponry, please.

[@terryburge6763]

Is the reason the government has not given SpaceX the go ahead to launch the Starship into orbit because NASA will look pretty bad spending so much for the SLS missions when the Starship is costing so much less? Seems to me a starship is cost about 1 million dollars but the SLS is at least 4 or 5 times that amount. And it is going to be reuseable. Terry

[@PatrickOCnMD]

I really don't see the point of going back. Not enough there to make it worth while. And to risk human lives. Best to just concentrate getting to Mars.

[@GreenPartyHat]

Imagine looking up at the Moon every night and knowing there are people there. That would inspire many people.

[@PatrickOCnMD]

@@GreenPartyHat Naaa....there is nothing there.

[@GreenPartyHat]

@@PatrickOCnMD Northing there yet. We need to built it.

[@louismiller7]

Why the heel can't you just stay on one thing ????

[@skipperofschool8325]

It's more dangerous in the long term

[@enigmaticloremaster1700]

first woman on the moon, I hope the man in the moon is ok with that.

[@peterlyall2848]

I live in Australia and the moon looks the other way round to us and for that it does not look like a man in moon....instead it looks like a Rabbit in the moon....Pete from Tasmania Australia 👍🇭🇲🌌😀

[@MrNote-lz7lh]

Why wouldn't they be? As long as she actually is capable and not someone just pushed through due to some wokester agenda it should be fine.

[@Mooseracks]

I will bet that this lunar orbiter spacecraft will not take any photos of the ALEDGED APOLLO landing sites...WHY? BECAUSE THEY NEVVVVVVVVEEEEERRR EVER WENT THERE....THERE ARE NO APOLLO LANDING SITES

[@GreenPartyHat]

I wonder what you will say when there is 4K footage of Astronauts walking around on the Moon in a few years.

[@Mooseracks]

@@GreenPartyHat it's a first

[@Mooseracks]

@@GreenPartyHat good luck finding the ALEDGED APOLLO LANDING SITES

[@stantheman9072]

Just go ahead and name the thing Babylon 6 and be done with it.

[@reyhanyilmaz1777]

this is just project..

[@InsaneCuriosity]

It will happen soon!

[@olivergrumitt2601]

Sorry, I should have said in my comment “the Americans are much LESS likely to regard the Artemis programme as worthwhile.

[@jvw82]

There going to fly around the moon not land on the moon suprise suprise….,

[@GreenPartyHat]

2022 Orbit moon - No crew 2024 Orbit moon - 4 Crew 2025 Moon landing - 2 Crew stay in orbit, 2 crew land on the Moon.

[@joshnorriss1969]

How can you make a video about this and not mention space x or starship? Also touting the SLS as the next step in interplanetary travel is staight up ignorance. Starship is going to be reusable & have the same capacity. Also it's not wildly over budget and years behind schedule. You my sir, are not impartial.

[@NavidIsANoob]

Well, for one, SLS exists.

[@joshnorriss1969]

Navid, you are not very smart are you.. starship does exist & is probably more going to launch long before sls considering the amount of delays they sls have faced.

[@NavidIsANoob]

@@joshnorriss1969 You do realise SLS has a launch to the moon coming up this year, right? 😂

[@joshnorriss1969]

Yes but will it be delayed again? Also it uses solid rocket boosters, wasteful and literally ancient technology.

[@NavidIsANoob]

@@joshnorriss1969 You just exposed yourself as a Musk fanboy. SRBs are used by literally every space agency and almost all launch systems on the planet. Ariane 5, one of the most successful launch systems right now uses SRBs. Stop embarrassing yourself and start informing yourself.

[@mayajaya2247]

ATEN ROCKETS SCIENCES SAR

[@Novak2611]

9:55 its shape is not aerodynamic, huge waste of energy..... just kidding :)

[@nicholashenning9034]

Not to beat the Soviet Union… now it’s called Russia 😂

[@Polyanna-ti2dz]

Really we're going to send dummies instead of real men makes me kind of Wonder because don't we have enough data from all them supposed missions we sent there before if you people want to keep believing this you go you go girls

[@qronicaltimes1888]

[@philipmcdonagh1094]

Can we not sort out Earth before we start fucking round with the Moon and Mars. To many problem on Earth without wasting trillions. We aren't intellectually or technically capable of doing these things in a meaningful way at this time

[@GreenPartyHat]

How is not exploring space going to solve problems on Earth? NASA gets less than 1% of America’s budget.

[@anthonyhitchings1051]

Artemis is disgraceful - its 55 year old technology. We need a smarter approach to moon development. OR simply acept that we live in a gravity prison, for all practical purposes.

[@adamjbond]

Baby Boomers may have tried to crush our dreams of interplanetary travel but they underestimated Millennials use of a globalized economy and workforce.

[@CountArtha]

Most of the SLS engineers are Boomers who worked on the STS

[@MrNote-lz7lh]

@@CountArtha Most of SLS engineers are 60+? Shouldn't they be retired?

[@brandenwalker5154]

Woman and man