I'm Saying Nothing

For years I've been analysing videos sent to me by my viewers. This time it's your turn, please let me know when the comments what you think of the events that led up to the smashed window.
Join this channel to get access to ADI Training Content
/ @ashley_neal
Dash Camera Affiliate Links. NOW USE CODE 'ASHLEY'
Car - Viofo - viofouk.co.uk/...
Motorcycle - Innov - innovv.co.uk/a...
Motorcycle, Bicycle and Equestrian - Techalogic - techalogic.co....
XNITO Cycle Helmets - xnito.com/ASHLEY137 Use code 'ASHLEY137' to recieve 10% off your order
Social Media
www.ashleyneal...
/ ashleynealdrivinginstr...
[e-mail]
Amazon Links
Sony a6400 Camera - amzn.to/2xVCrn0
Sony A7C Camera - amzn.to/3JUvUIa
Tascam DR-10L Microphone - amzn.to/3M8P0fd
Sony FDR X3000 Action Camera - amzn.to/2YVoPDh

[@JohnR31415]

Ridiculously aggressive driving from the cammer - as normal didn’t get him anywhere other than stopped at lights, and of course a quicker trip to the petrol station. No excuse for the smashed window though.

[@PJWey]

State of the world in one 2 min video

[@Speeder84XL]

The idiot in the first red car should be in the left lane if not going faster than the other cars there anyway. Then he speed up slightly when beeing tailgated, but then slow down again and refuses to change to the slow lane once past the other car. But with that said, the cam car was still too aggressive - it didn't look like there was much space to get in front of it at 1:10 (so he most likely forced the slow idiot to slam on the brakes and slow down even more, to not get hit - which was most likely what triggered that level of aggession). For the second red car, he also goes straight to undertake - despite it indicating it's about to change lane (which was a quite impatient move).

[@chunkyfecalbreakfast]

If the cam car hadn’t been held up by the window smasher, he would have been through a green light instead of stopped with the idiot at the red light

[@TheCatBilbo]

​@@Speeder84XLThe Citroen does signal left but cancels. I think that might be because they see the cammer approaching quickly in lane 1. Then the cammer sits close to their nearside; Citroen has to move left because of red Ford behind. But, they're probably hesitant because the cammer is so close.

[@staffordian]

Dangerous & careless driving by cammer. No excuse though for the illegal attack by the 'victim' I'd give them both an Ashley Neal score of an E. Could be argued that the glass smasher lane hogged, but to me it looked like he was at or just over the speed limit given the braking for the speed camera so cammer shouldn't have been wanting to overtake anyway.

[@DSAVAGE92]

Cammer fucked around and found out. Absolutely pointless tailgating, undertaking, cutting people up, and speeding and what do you know he comes across another lunatic who’s willing to escalate it further than him. The fact he stopped so far from the red light makes me think he knew he’d fucked with the wrong person.

[@harrybosch5720]

Point well made. You never know who you're messing with.

[@greatleapforwards]

exactly this. I don't condone the actions of the red car guy one bit, but the cammer cut him up twice! the irony is that his reckless overtaking was for naught because he was caught at the light anyway

[@AzguardMike]

so what your saying is, if a car drives that way, we should smash the windows? Yeah, no thanks. Better to just leave them be. Idiots like this cammer will end up wrapped around a tree. Not worth smashing their window up and being a vile thug. But from the sounds of it, the OP is one.

[@marklittler784]

If they'd been tailgating the Focus driver might have realised someone didn't feel they were making enough progress.

[@DemiGod..]

Reminds me of another video wherby the cammer trys to force 2 men to have an accident comming off the roundabout. They then cut him off and go crazy. He is terrified and has no idea why they doing this. Most viewers were on the side of the stupid cammer.

[@johnrussell5245]

Appalling and selfish driving by the dash cam car. But I'm not condoning the smashing of his window.

[@JohnR31415]

Pretty sure the vehicle wasn’t doing the driving. The nut behind the wheel is, as ever, the most dangerous thing in the road.

[@TonyGoff-Yu]

Fixated on what's in front as opposed to what's in front and behind.

[@strut06]

Driving like absolute tools didn't get either driver anywhere any faster. The red c1 and the white van both pulled up to the same red light as both the camera car and the focus. I get it's frustrating being stuck behind a vehicle that appears to be 'going too slow'. But they still wouldn't have gotten any further down the road had they both being driving a bit more sensibly.

[@leexgx]

Lane hogging is what it led upto it (dashcam driver went fast technically cut the other car didn't like it)

[@tarnmonath]

@@JohnR31415 Mr Russell was making use of a figure of speech called 'metonymy', which can take several forms. In this case, something is referred to by the name of something closely associated with it. 😎

[@Manu-Official]

Cammer was aggressive. This does not justify the damage, but a clear case of play stupid games win stupid prizes. There's always someone more stupid out there.

[@marklittler784]

Find it very very hard to believe that Focus driver travelled that distance without using their mirrors but because the cammer wasn't tailgating they probably didn't see any problem.

[@Manu-Official]

@@marklittler784 Focus driver went nuts when he got cut off at 1:09 and then again at 1:25 - the rear camera being wide does not quite show how close that cut was, but owning 2 dashcams, I can tell. Another something to notice, is the complete lack of indicators doing a clicking noise, because he didn't use them.

[@CristiNeagu]

He may have been aggressive, but not overly so to begin with. He was telling the red car he's hogging the road. The red car was the first one to start the aggression, by refusing to move over at 0:50 and choosing to instead block the cam car behind him.

[@Thunder-54321]

When egos collide

[@wagglycloth4547]

@@CristiNeaguyou have a funny definition of aggression.

[@Slaeowulf]

I think we all know what the issue was here, but bravo to the Citroën for noticing the road rage, noticing the undertake and abandoning the move, and then getting out of the way when it was able to. Top marks.

[@dobiqwolf]

exactly, innocent driver getting caught in stupid events caused by an idiot.

[@Kieran.Rob53]

Did the Citroën not cut up the cam car at 1:25 or am I blind?

[@lovelybitofsquirrel]

@@Kieran.Rob53 Yes but they were just trying to get out of the way of both cars I think. They tried to move over to the left earlier but the cammer was coming up fast on the left. Then when they didn't undertake and the other red car was coming up, the Citreon didn't have much choice but to move over to the left. Tbf though the Citreon should have been in the left lane in the first place.

[@Kieran.Rob53]

@@lovelybitofsquirrel So because a car is coming up behind you in the overtaking lane it’s then okay to cut someone up in the left lane???

[@Slaeowulf]

​​@@Kieran.Rob53 They could tell the cam car was driving aggressively and trying to get past. They CORRECTLY moved out of the way to let the idiot by.

[@andyfarms9653]

The cammer was driving like a knob. Unfortunately he encountered an even bigger knob.I don’t think it’s worth analysing beyond saying that he was trying to drive fast in an urban environment that would achieve precisely nothing in reducing his journey time. Interesting to learn if there was a sequel?

[@signant]

@@andyfarms9653 I once heard a guy say. "You can act a co*k if you want but I am a co*k, a much bigger co*k than you'll ever be or you have ever seen". It was about 10 seconds later the other guys is picking himself up off the floor he said. "Now I suggest you stay down like the floppy little co*k you are"... And I leaned two things. 1. Don't be a co*k unless your certain you're the biggest one about. 2. You don't know who's the biggest (I assume it's often the nicest guys) but often the rewards of the measuring contest aren't worth the price of losing.

[@christophergallagher3845]

Nah he went straight to police and played victim 😂

[@funkyuk1]

definitely something to do with the morbidly depressing music playing in your viewers car. They should get a Girls Aloud CD on the stereo 👍🏼

[@thealbagalavanter9986]

If someone did that in my car j would hit the off button

[@RiverMersey]

NO! - Ash would get demonetised!🤷‍♂

[@Rapscallion2009]

​@@thealbagalavanter9986I'd hit the "ejector seat" button.😊

[@aspuzling]

Ashley has to adjust the music so he doesn't get demonetised. The song is called All For You by Cian Ducrot and the real version sounds much less demonic.

[@thealbagalavanter9986]

@@aspuzling heard it on the radio the other day

[@fitmydashcam]

Distinct lack of proper observation - cam driver didn't see, or didn't care about red car at all, and was driving dangerously, undertaking (legal, but unsafe here, so illegal), likely speeding and just generally driving in a manner that renders him/her/them a complete bellend. The fact they stopped very much behind the red ford at the lights means they probably didn't want to make eye contact and knew they'd messed up, more than once. No excuse for smashing a window or causing damage, but you can see why the driver of the red ford was annoyed at least.

[@larssonk22]

I can see why both were annoyed, keep left unless overtaking. That is a minor infraction compared to what the van driver was doing, what an absolute tool.

[@aspuzling]

I don't think it's lack of observation. He probably saw the red ford approach quickly in his mirrors but there was no way he was going to let him pass again after deliberately undertaking him.

[@David-um8tb]

Could you explain under what circumstances undertaking is legal in the UK? Sorry I'm not from there and assumed undertaking was illegal everywhere in Europe.

[@insightphoto]

how can undertaking be "legal, but....illegal" I suspect you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about!

[@fitmydashcam]

@@insightphoto it is legal in the sense that there is no specific offence. It would come under dangerous driving, or driving without due care etc. So if done in a way that is safe, IE - loads of space, just passing someone in the middle lane etc, no issue. The ultimate point about undertaking though, is that is should NEVER be possible, if everyone else is driving correctly.

[@Delaterius]

Looks like the cam driver was mad at the red car for not going as fast as he wanted in the right lane, so he passed aggressively, probably making gestures, and then intentionally cut him off when the Citroen changed lanes. He was risking worse than a broken window with his hostile driving, so I can't say I feel bad for him

[@marklittler784]

Cam car wasn't tailgating giving the car in front the impression they felt they weren't making sufficient progress so the red car probably assumed everyone behind was contented

[@CristiNeagu]

The red car should have been in the left hand lane.

[@demil3618]

Why was that car sitting in the outside lane in the first place? He should have been inside or pass someone. Just the same behaviour than middle lane drivers in the motorway. Terrible people!

[@chrisl1797]

​@@demil3618there is a 6 second gap between them clearing the white van and the under take starting. Hardly outside lane hogging.

[@chrisl1797]

​@@marklittler784he was about 1 second behind in several places, which seems the norm for many these days. 2 seconds is much safer.

[@MAJ0RMEL0DY]

Can we take a moment to salute the Red Citroen driver. Absolutely read what was going on and stayed clear and proceeded with their own manoeuvre whilst avoiding this nightmare and having full awareness! 1:15 drops indicator seeing approaching undertaking car, then holds on waiting to see how it develops and indicates again to proceed… Fair play

[@Kieran.Rob53]

Did the red Citroën not cut up the cammer at 1:25 or am I blind?

[@MAJ0RMEL0DY]

@@Kieran.Rob53 the cammer looked like they held off undertaking (to block the road the road maybe) the Citroen re indicates In this moment presumably having read the approaching vehicle drop speed allowing them to indicate. Presumed and assumed in all fairness I have no real evidence just trying to analyse what I see.

[@andyh4191]

Was just thinking the same thing. At first the Citroen drive must have wondered what the heck was the cammer playing at, trying to undertake whilst they had their indicator on. Then did the sensible thing and got their car out of harms way.

[@MAJ0RMEL0DY]

@@andyh4191 one of those car body language things… we could be wrong but it looks like the Citroen driver is switched on. Or blissfully unaware lol

[@wasspj]

@@Kieran.Rob53 The cammer nearly collided with the citreon attempting to return to lane 1 because they were driving like a maniac in direct contravention of the highway code. You don't get to claim that you were "cut up" when the situation is entirely a product of your own poor driving.

[@jafboxed]

Weaving in and out of traffic. Then telling a driver who you offended to F off, and then being surprised by the outcome 😂

[@stevenbryant2993]

Every time I encounter an idiot like the camera car on the road, I always think "Wait until you do that to the wrong person". This video is a perfect example of what happens when they do. I doubt this video went to the police...

[@user-mv5zt8qd9l]

Given that it's been sent out to KZbin channels, I imagine the police have received a (assumedly heavily cut-down version) so the cammer can play the victim over his smashed window.

[@LIKWID]

​@@user-mv5zt8qd9l regardless of the shocking driving standards of the cammer, they are still the victim of road rage. There's no excuse for a window being smashed regardless of how shockingly bad their driving is.

[@MrHennoGarvie]

@@user-mv5zt8qd9l He is a victim. Much like hes commited a crime driving the way he did. They dont cancel each other out. Are you happy his window got smashed? Pretty weird if thats the case.

[@illegalopinions4082]

​@LIKWID Idk about that. People act the fool because they never receive consequences for being foolish. He f'd around and found out why he shouldn't. Some people learn by listening, others refuse to listen until they learn by experience.

[@demil3618]

The video is a perfect example of people blocking a lane and not even realising it. This is what happens daily on motorways, in the middle lane. Buses/coaches/lorries etc can only undertake there as they aren’t allowed in the outside lane. Here were only two lanes, yet especially the 1st driver didn’t cardio pull back in or pass. This is what created the issue in the 1st place!

[@Reece_Hodges]

I would be far too embarrassed to send this video in! It didn't look like the red car was driving particularly slowly either to warrant some kind of reaction to try and undertake, not that this would excuse it. Bizarre.

[@Tailspin80]

If he had a brain it wouldn’t have happened in the first place.

[@01Kershawsp]

Cammer needs to retake his driving test Other car needs lessons in anger management

[@davidvanderklauw]

Your confidence in the driving test is misplaced.

[@IndigoJo]

Other driver needs to be taken to court for carrying an offensive weapon and criminal damage.

[@Pugna-cz6gs]

@@IndigoJo🤡

[@Sarah-mg3gg]

Other driver needs to pay for a new window.

[@adamholmes91]

@@IndigoJo Where was the weapon? It could have been their fist, elbow, foot... head

[@user-mv5zt8qd9l]

It's amazing that someone can set up a camera to film their driving and then act in ways that are so brazenly contrary to the standards and laws governing road use. I'm sure the driver in the red C1 was having a laugh watching the other driver who got victimised by the cammer's horrible behaviour retaliating at the lights.

[@Ep1cure]

I like driving like it's a video game too. And smashing car windows. But only in video games.

[@arkadye]

I think it would be a fun April Fool's Day collaboration for Ashley to get some footage (with permission, obviously) from a GTA5 speedrun where a crash ruined the run, and do an earnest voiceover analysing the causes of the crash as though it's IRL driving.

[@PercivalBlakeney]

Hence the expressions … "A courteous driver is a safe driver." "A good attitude compensates for poor skills far better than good skills compensate for a poor attitude." This is why I drive slowly and give way. 🌹

[@BobMc87]

Thats a good saying!

[@Rroff2]

Driving slowly isn't necessarily any better if it is significantly less than the speed limit and conditions allow for. It just unnecessarily frustrates a lot of people and leads to avoidable dangerous situations.

[@PercivalBlakeney]

@@Rroff2 Sorry you feel that way. Personally, I just drive slowly and when opportunities present themselves to let people overtake… I just let them. Too many Kenneth Noyes on the road… in the World in general. 😶

[@Rroff2]

@@PercivalBlakeney It isn't about how I feel, it is what makes the roads work best for everybody.

[@PercivalBlakeney]

@@Rroff2 The only driving you can control is your own. Ultimately, in my experience, it's not about who's right or wrong; it's about simply what keeps me out of trouble. 🌹

[@Gelgisith]

In a nutshell: Impatient cammer tailgates, undertakes, and cuts off car; the short-fused driver of which then smashes cammer's window. Both idiots, imo.

[@christophergallagher3845]

At least the idiot in red car still has all his windows 😂

[@PedroConejo1939]

I cannot commend the cammer for anything there, quite the opposite. They seem like someone who habitually puts others under unnecessary pressure for the weakest of reasons, and occasionally turns that into aggressive and risky behaviour (we've all met them hundreds of times). This is what happens when you drive like this. Every now and then, you're going to meet someone who's already having a bad day and then you arrive a few feet behind them and gurney at them through the mirror. I thought the Ford driver was doing well not to spend time alongside the delivery van, and the C1 initially saw the risk, but inevitably found themselves getting caught up in someone else's episode. They probably won't be a friendly witness for the cammer. The reaction of smashing the window was obviously unacceptable, but to be honest, someone was going to do something like that sooner or later if that's the cammer's normal way of driving.

[@smilerbob]

We often see comments elsewhere on clips where the cammer is being aggressive saying that they will do it to the wrong person, and this is the result Agree the window snashing was not warranted. Any form of aggression is never warranted but I wonder if this has changed the cammers behaviour? I know one person who drives similar to this and they say they want a good smack on the road to calm them down. I used to ask why not just calm down but now save my breath as the excuses are worse than the driving

[@PedroConejo1939]

@@smilerbob That's pretty weird reasoning. I suppose the trick is to be one step removed when the inevitable happens.

[@smilerbob]

@@PedroConejo1939 I am two steps removed being in a different location in the country and only really have contact a couple of times through the year One less worry of guilty by association 😉

[@PedroConejo1939]

@@smilerbob 😆

[@dannydee2668]

I think the cammer learned something from this event.

[@tonyrodd6348]

Clearly the driver of the red car couldn’t stand that horrible music😂

[@BanjoPixelSnack]

IKR what was that?? Possibly it drove cammer over the edge and that’s why he was driving like he had nothing to lose lol.

[@abethegamerful]

The guy that smashed the window got instant karma after smashing the window made him hear it

[@eddycurrant1380]

the cammer is an accident waiting to happen, why the video was shared is testament to a total lack of awareness. generally

[@Khaisz.]

What started all that was probably the cammers stuid lane change at 1:11 and what made the other driver tip over the edge was the 2nd lane change at 1:24, if the cammer wasn't weaving through the street like a F1 driver, non of this would have happened.

[@CristiNeagu]

Indeed. The cammer was telling the red car to get out of the way and the red car told the cammer he's too close. If both of them had listened to eachother and the red car moved into the left lane where he was supposed to be instead of escalating things, nothing would have happened.

[@Jonc25]

For anyone interested, the cammers' speed over 1096 metres was 43mph. average.

[@SyneticsHD]

It’s on a road that’s covered in average speed cameras too

[@dazayit]

Cameras don't work.

[@KindredBrujah]

Assuming that's correct, that's likely to be a trip straight to the dock, even if you ignored all of the dangerous and reckless driving. Edit: Apparently it was a 40 limit. That's less of an issue. Everyone was travelling awfully slowly in a 40 though, besides the cammer.

[@DWestheim]

Two people that haven't been told NO their entire lives?

[@JasonCliftJones]

Fairly normal in the first minute. Red Focus in front of us not really overtaking (other than briefly speeding up past the van), should prob drop to lane 1 but could be turning right ahead somewhere so not an issue. Maybe in cruise control or something. About 1:01, cammer decides to undertake. This feels a bit of impatient "must get in front", as seems to totally fail to spot the left turning car ahead until quite late. Instead of backing off, speeds into the gap back into lane 2 (into increasing risk), probably making the Focus brake a little. Focus driver now antagonised. 1:16 - Red 107, having moved out to go around the darker blue car going left, looks to drop back into lane 1 after passing the turning car and quickly aborts seeing cammer going for an undertake. For some reason, cammer holds back, Focus sees this and speeds up. 107 getting out of the way of them chops cammer but has little choice; cammer could have made more space to drop into, can't tell if they were flashed in. If the Cammer stays behind the 107, situation poss defuses anyway but nope, Cammer then must stay in front of Focus so chops them to overtake the 107. Both then promptly get stuck at the red. So yeah, started by the cammers impatience, cammer gets an F. Focus gets an F for the retaliation. 107 gets an A for situational awareness, possibly dropped to a B for how close that chop seemed.

[@kumquatmagoo]

1:16 cammer shouldn't be undertaking, 107 gets an A+ for getting out of the way of both knobheads. The 107 only moves back in to the left lane after our cammer slams his breaks on to not activate the cameras.

[@SnickersTS]

The cammer almost caused a crash with the Ford by changing lanes as the Ford was overtaking, which would have caused a lot more damage than his smashed window. If you go about annoying people all day, guess what happens.

[@ricequackers]

Standard Birmingham experience, scummy people and crap driving all around.

[@smilerbob]

No matter how big you let your ego get on the roads, you will find someone with a bigger one Once the ego gets too large it restricts oxygen to the sensible side of the brain and idiocy prevails Cam car triggered by someone not moving left and shows the frustration by passing on zig zags before cutting in front to avoid a rear end collision…assuming they saw the vehicle and wasn’t target fixated on the “lane hogger” This triggered the other driver and then to do the same again sent them over the edge Not saying the reaction was correct but the cammer really needs to look inwards at themself before trying to appoint responsibility elsewhere

[@scottytremaineplays9461]

Interesting that you read it as triggered by lack of moving over. I read it as general road ownership complex. For me, not moving over is annoying and poor driving whereas undertaking and moving out without sufficient space is dangerous. Red car then purposefully escalated the situation to the point of actually committing a crime.

[@goodyeoman4534]

He won't. He will stay exactly the same and forever see himself as the victim.

[@MRAMAZRBALLZZ]

One idiot was an idiot to another idiot so the other idiot had to out idiot the original idiot. People need to seriously calm down, it's crazy. Even with the reckless driving and undertaking they all ended stopped at the same light in the end...

[@FlyingPhysicist]

No sympathy for the cammer.

[@demil3618]

Why? He had to undertake the 1st car that was blocking the outside lane for no reason (who is probably also a middle lane driver on the motorway). He had to undertake, no choice there.

[@arcan762]

@@demil3618 Speed limit

[@wwe904]

@@demil3618 If you think this is acceptable driving, that's terrifying.

[@rabidlemming3680]

@@demil3618 No, the cammer didn't have to undertake. He did have to avoid the car turning due to his aggressive driving, causing him to cut in front of the car he undertook, but if he hadn't of undertook, or was paying attention, avoiding action would not be needed.

[@musicalaviator]

@@demil3618 There is a device installed on cars which some idiots don't seem to know about. It's called a Brake. It is able to give you a choice to avoid crashing into someone who slowed down in front of you without bouncing into an already occupied lane.

[@zensibleone2295]

The one takeaway, is that at least when this occurs between two nutters, it's a nutter that is on the receiving end. Two wrongs dont make a right, but you can't act like that and expect to go through life without winding up the wrong person at some point.

[@trueriver1950]

This just shows that there's different kinds of stupid. The cam car was driving inconsiderately and it got them nowhere. That was one kind of stupid. Damaging the cammer's car, when they had plenty of chance to clock your number plate is a request to go to jail, do not pass Go, do not collect £200. That's another kind of stupid.

[@ChrisBrown-px1oy]

"Ain't going in no inner lane, fool", is another. I'm not one of those commenters who prowl the dashcam channels looking to rejoice in punishment of lane-hoggers everywhere. But if you're not overtaking or turning right and someone's catching you behind, even at the speed limit, best move left.

[@seanmccormack3735]

I feel bad for the Citroën driver, they were put into a very uncomfortable situation by both drivers. They handled it very well though, props to them

[@Kieran.Rob53]

Didn’t they cut the cammer up at 1:25 ?

[@fetchstixRHD]

​@@Kieran.Rob53: A bit, but then they had very few real options, and the cammer seemed to be using them to block the other car (along with the fact that they were in the process of moving in, but cammer made them change plan). It was signed as average speed, which removes the option of accelarating hard/breaking the speed limit (not that you should, of course) then moving in (and comes with the assumption that the cammer wouldn't have also sped up too), and staying in their position probably would've left them boxed in...

[@seanmccormack3735]

@@Kieran.Rob53I think they were frightened by the Focus coming up behind them, and quickly decided they wanted no part in whatever was about to go down, so they got out of the way as soon as possible. Cam car also seemed to be holding back behind it, so while the move was kind of close, I would allow it as it was quick and smart decision making for their own safety

[@Kieran.Rob53]

@@fetchstixRHD They had a perfect flawless option they could’ve taken. I don’t expect them to make the best decision however I absolutely don’t expect people in these comments justifying them making a wrong and dangerous decision. The correct decision for the Citroen in this situation would’ve been to REMAIN in lane 2 with a LEFT SIGNAL to show they wish to move to lane 1. They MUST NOT move into lane 1 until it is safe to do so. They simply moved over far too early.

[@Kieran.Rob53]

@@seanmccormack3735 The people in these comments are acting as if I don’t understand why the Citroen did what it did. I completely understand and I even agree that it makes sense, however it’s still illegal and dangerous when there was a better alternative decision.

[@smilerbob]

_Written in the style of the usual bots_ Your videos are shattering the divide between people with pure driving aggression to smash through others opinions ❤️❤️

[@ChrisBrown-px1oy]

I'll just have to imagine that ribbon as a tassel hanging down over a surgically inflated cheek from a thong strap.

[@zoeywyllie1411]

Only thing I want to add is great driving from the red Citroen who wound up behind the cam car at the lights. Saw the cam car was going to be trouble in their mirrors and decided to cancel their move back to the left to get the cam car in front and out of the way then moved back over once safe to do so. Great observations, great job at preventing escalation to yourself!

[@trueriver1950]

I wonder if the half brick or whatever had an elastic band advertising a windscreen repair outfit?

[@st200ol]

40mph road and the driver of the other car was going around that speed I’d estimate so why the impatience? Obviously the other car does this frequently to try and get a reaction as they carry something to smash windscreens, well done for taking the bait.

[@46rrodriguez]

Taking the bait? The cammer is driving like idiot and then instead an apology said f..of. Play stupid games win stupid prizes and both should be charged for the foul behaviour

[@adinigel]

Why did the cammer send in the video? Was he hoping for sympathy or was he offering it as education of how not to wind other drivers up?

[@laceandwhisky]

Just been saying to my daughter let it go, is it worth it, she is an hgv class one driver biker car driver gets fed up with other road users i see her point i do but let it go is it worth it

[@paulsengupta971]

Part of the medical examination for a Class 1 HGV driver should be psychological, in that the person doesn't get wound up on the roads, and maintains a calm relaxed manner. That would makes the roads safer.

[@colinbestford5062]

Play silly games, win silly prizes.

[@chrispayne523]

Not only does camer overtakes on the nearside it also on the zig-zag lines

[@robg521]

There are some very nasty and violent people out there, if you drive calmly and defensively then the chances of drawing attention from these people is greatly reduced. Martial arts… Someone one asked me what’s the best fighting style to deal with getting into a fight in a pub. My answer was … don’t get drawn into fights in pubs, people who start fights in pubs are idiots and sooner or later they will meet someone who is not an idiot and they will come unstuck. [most martial arts training will serve you well if you have no choice but to fight against an idiot]. But then added … if you are the one who is starting the trouble then that makes you the idiot.

[@lolitapitpong3826]

Driving a German car the amount of aggression from other road users is insane, it doesn’t really matter how calmly you drive

[@Batters56]

One wonders how many other windows the other driver has put in?

[@DjDolHaus86]

I'm genuinely curious about how he broke the window because the guy on the right didn't appear to get out of his car?

[@markj66]

This is in the UK. Cars are right hand drive so you couldn't see the drivers door.

[@NoNeed2No]

​@@DjDolHaus86🤦🏼Ok American

[@Dante_Williams]

Silly question but did the cammer hand in this footage thinking they did no wrong?

[@dobiqwolf]

I hope not, they were a danger on the road.

[@nicholascampbell3259]

I seriously wonder if the person who submitted this footage is trolling Ashley, expecting to get a suitably horrified reaction about their appalling standard of driving. However, I don't know if the footage has been shown on any other dashcam channels (I've stopped watching most of them).

[@metromadness2016]

To me the guy in the Red Car should have been the bigger man and let it go

[@THEANPHROPY]

Zero justification for smashing his window! I might report this to the DVLA & Police!!! Peace & Love!!!

[@DjDolHaus86]

I'd call it comeuppance. He made stupid bets and he won a stupid prize

[@d.i.l.l.i.g.a.f]

Seems to have forgot they were in a hurry after their window got smashed. Ford had to brake for the speed camera lines, suggesting they were going the speed limit or very close. Amazed how this clip made it into the public domain, Had I been the Cam Car Driver, I would have been far to embarrassed to post such a thing for others to see. No way that they thought others would take their side, and agree they were the victim here surely. Two people who need to go on specialist courses, Cam Driver a retest, and Ford Driver Anger Management perhaps.

[@wirdy1]

The criminal damage was not justified, however the cammer was driving like a tool with very little SA & zero consideration for others. Maybe under 25 with limited experience & big male ego?

[@davem9204]

Ego doesn't decrease with age or gender. Just look at some of the world's politicians.

[@markwalton8644]

The Smashing of the Window was completely over the Top Reaction but cutting someone up Twice played a Massive Part of the other drivers annoyance, which Cam driver knew by the fact he didn't go alongside at the junction!!

[@iMrPlenty]

What could someone be carrying in their car thats disposable and hard enough to smash a window?

[@dazednconfused31337]

I've heard thieves will throw a broken piece of ceramic from a spark plug. As the passenger window is only open a small amount it could be an air pistol or catapult. Though the glass went quite far. But the awkward angle, movement in the mirror and delay driving off I think he got out and threw a rock etc. My dad had his jacket stolen at night college and the brick? even smashed through the cabin plastic on the opposite side.

[@_Steven_S]

Tempered side windows are not that difficult to smash, especially if they are open... a decent kick/shoulder/elbow would do it. If it's closed a well placed hammer fist with a set of keys would probably do it.

[@craftsmanwoodturner]

I once saw a man-child with a similarly fragile ego punch in the side window of the car he thought had wronged him. Anger and idiocy are dangerous bed-fellows!

[@ninetieschild9114]

He drove like moron. Almost caused multiple Collisions, he should lose his license along with his whole car, never mind just a single side window.

[@jasonk7072]

Both parties behaved badly, though the cammer didn't cause any permanent damage on this occasion so will probably be the one that feels most aggrieved. Add two measures of poor driving to two measures of entitlement and this is what happens. No-one comes out of this with any credit. .

[@kyedavis1899]

Best part is he can't really send this footage to the police without risking some bonus points for his licence or possibly a ban. Or even worse imagine sending this to your insurance company.

[@clivewilliams3661]

Allowing for the distortion that the dash cam creates, the cammer is clearly tailgating the red car and weaving as well as cutting up the red car to make an overtake. I am not surprised that the red car occupants got angry but that does not excuse criminal damage.

[@jamesr4899]

Did the psycho car dirty twice.. Terrible driving. But smashing a window over it nuts!

[@nickramsden5366]

Back in our day Ashley they'd both be graded a U 😮

[@allen_key]

This clip was sent in voluntarily? Citroen did well.

[@Kieran.Rob53]

Did the Citroen not cut the cammer up at 1:25 or?

[@allen_key]

They had established visual contact and were anticipating issues with the focus bearing down at high speed. A bit of a rock and a hard place situation and not just for the poor window.

[@allen_key]

They had identified the camera car was not going to pass as they would have already done so given they gave them the space to do so by not completing the lane change initially. The camera car was happy to break the rules but not consistently.

[@ChrisCoxCycling]

F*cked around. Found out.

[@ibs5080]

Oh that great Ashley-ism of "If the other car was a police car". You've reminded me of a fairly recent tv ad for a certain well known Uk opticians chain. Where John Cleese's white car doesn't start, so he goes and gets a tree branch to give it a "damn good thrashing" just like he did years earlier in that famous Fawlty Towers sketch. Well in the tv ad, he mistook a parked and occupied police car for his own white car, thus illustrating the need to visit that well known opticians chain. As in "Should have gone to..." etc.

[@tin2001]

Fairly recent? That ad is like a decade old now - maybe more. I mean, it's fairly recent in comparison to Fawlty Towers, but....

[@ibs5080]

@@tin2001 You're right. I think the fact that I saw it "recently" on KZbin made me lose track of time. Does that make me one of Ashley's "Deluded Viewers"?

[@davem9204]

@@tin2001 Anything since about 1995 is considered fairly recent for us old gits!

[@fakecrusader]

@@davem9204 Yep, things you swear only happened one or two years ago turn out to be 10-12 years when you look them up. It's not a greeat feeling :(

[@Nysvarth]

The most bizarre thing is that the cam driver submitted this thinking they were in the right! Should forward it with their details to the police.

[@peterdcary]

Kenith Noye springs to my mind..

[@paulmarsy1041]

Lets get this straight, cam car was slightly tailgating the red Ford, not much but did so. Cam car undertook Red Ford, almost caused a collision with a blue Hyundi, and the red car whilst swerving into the path of the red Ford, then later forced a red Citroen to alter their plans as cam car undertook them. Red ford fell back but then sped up to confront the cam car when the cam car overtook blue Citroen into path of red Ford. Okay Cam car wasn't driving safely enough, but not sure it warranted the confrontation and breaking the window. Cam car to blame for creating the issue, equally the red Ford should have let it go, and let the cam car get sorted out by either TOR or runs out of luck, red Ford has fragile ego.

[@JSmith19858]

The cam driver ran out of luck here. They crossed paths with an idiot equal to themselves. I hope they learnt from it

[@demil3618]

Cam car was using the outside landete pass, other cars were sitting there for no reason, so had to be undertaken. The first outside driver (likely also a middle lane driver) never realised it, the 2nd did wake up and did not get undertaken. So no blame on the cam driver as he had to put up with stupid people who shouldn’t have been where they were.

[@wasspj]

@@demil3618 All this tells us is that you are as stupid and entitled as the cam driver.

[@RVNmax]

​@demil3618 Stupid drivers do not warrant stupid manoeuvres. They were going at speed limit. So cam driver was wrong for speeding, undertaking and dangerous manoeuvres and not being patient. There are stationary vehicles waiting to pull out and occupying the left lane makes that harder for them. All in all, cam driver created a lot of hassle for no benefit.

[@demil3618]

@@RVNmax How do you know the others were at the limit? Quite often drivers miss signs and stay at a lower one (just like they miss the time when bus lanes are open).

[@nigeltaylor72]

That "music" is surely capable of shattering glass! Is it playing at the wrong speed?

[@tehb0ll0x]

It's been distorted in editing to avoid a DMCA claim, which would generally result in the video being demonetised and/or a strike against the channel.

[@cactusbase3088]

@@tehb0ll0x It actually improved the sound 🤣

[@bramelsheretan]

the tailgating and then the undertake at 1.08 triggers everything. Your cammer gets a Z for being an idiot and the guy who reacted gets a G as he'll end up in trouble

[@chunkyfecalbreakfast]

No, he won’t. There’s no requirement to identity the driver UNLESS it’s a traffic offence

[@hausmaster9801]

As bad as the window smash is I’d like to hope the cammer will always remember it and not continue to drive like a knob

[@douglasreid699]

Pain is a good teacher (well, something costing you money also works plus the inconvenience of it), i bet this cak driver will not be slicing through traffic again anytime soon. Hopefully they learn from it and thats why they sent Ashley the video and not because they thought they were right and how dare they smash the window.

[@Zulisian]

Familiar with this road, it's the Wolverhampton road, heading towards Birmingham / Quinton via the Hagley Road West. It's a busy road, with people often needing to cut across it, or turn right off it and there are even school crossing points along this 40mph dual carriageway with active "lollypop" crossing points. Cam car is clearly not interested in the "flow" of traffic, his undertake was just unnecessary and you can see the ford took offense to it, as when he goes to undertake the Peugeot the ford has dropped a gear and is effectively "chasing him". When the Peugeot decides to stop lane hogging the outside lane for no obvious reason at all, he cuts up the ford again, with clearly no right of way to do so, making this even more personal for the ford driver, they were inches away from colliding. You can see now, Mr Cam car doesn't have the balls to explain himself at the lights, so holds back instead of talking with the driver he's just mugged off twice, and at 1:43 you can see in the side mirror of the ford, that the driver has got out of the vehicle. At 1:54 you can see the suspension move, as the driver gets back in. I don't condone what the Ford driver did, because no one owns the roads, but if this person is a viewer of yours, and thinks that their driving is okay, they need a long hard look at themselves, because they invited this trouble. (I'm assuming genders obviously, it doesn't matter if it was a woman or a man, the driving was stupid, equally so, the reaction was while understandable in their anger, completely disproportionate)

[@jvoric]

Speeding and weaving on n out of traffic .. and looks to be doing more than 30pmh!

[@aspuzling]

Looks like a 40 mph limit. There are reminder signs.

[@jvoric]

@@aspuzlingoh, I’ll go watch it on a bigger screen than my phone 😝

[@jeremypnet]

@@jvoric At 1:11 there is a repeater sign (also a speed camera warning sign) which says 40 on it.

[@jvoric]

@@jeremypnetyeah, I’ve seen it now.. I went landscape on my phone ..😂

[@wasspj]

That whole road is a 40. It runs from (just next to) junction 2 of the M5 to the Hagley Rd. They were both doing comfortably over 40 though.

[@WestNottsRunner]

Obviously there is no excuse for smashing a window. The red car (plus other cars) didn't have the greatest of lane discipline but it definitely wasn't the worst I've seen. An impatient and aggressive cammer just made the whole situation worse.

[@WooRSte]

Just because someone is driving shit doesn’t give you the right to smash their window.

[@Thecommentator-hc1fz]

Thank you captain obvious. No one said it was ok.

[@leexgx]

Both was driving badly (red car was Lane hogging)

[@metromadness2016]

What the Cammer did is something you see everyday.

[@WooRSte]

@@Thecommentator-hc1fz videos like this are proof it’s not ‘obvious’, people are clearly dumb enough to do it.

[@WooRSte]

@@metromadness2016 and we just have to put up with it I guess 🤷‍♂️

[@gordy4459]

A perfect example of how to let your frustration get the better of you...this would make a very good driver training clip of not what to do!...

[@wba1014a]

context for the road is-- its the Wolverhampton new road (A4123) towards Harborne/ B'ham. And its an AVERAGE speed camera zone set to 50MPH. so no way this cammer and red are weren't speeding and gonna get a ticket for that too

[@esraeloh8681]

Why in the hell did they just start driving like that... And then the other muppet just starts chasing like they aren't both in charge of multi ton vehicles around families & whomever else just happens to be on that road with them...

[@velogoo]

Ashley, I’d be interested to know if the cammer made any judgement on their own driving when they submitted the clip, and whether anything was reported to the police? Obviously the other parties actions were completely unacceptable and they should be charged with criminal damage or whatever, but the manner of driving of the cammer was atrocious - selfish is the best word I can think of to describe it.

[@iKaGe01]

No forward planning cut the red car up twice. Though the second time was caused by a car not looking prior to entering the left lane but that said, I'd never undertake a car in that situation

[@TimedOnOff]

The second time was a deliberate provocation. The Citroen had indicated to pull into the left lane but saw the cammer coming up fast(er) and cancelled the manouevre but then the cammer held back so the Citroen indicated again and pulled in. The cammer did this deliberately to give the Focus driver the impression they could then pass both of them but, as soon as the Citroen was in, the cammer swung straight out in front of them.

[@hermand]

Frankly, asked for it. Okay, we can bleat about how "there's no excuse for violence", but the cam driving was a disgrace and there was zero need for it. He cut up that car not once, but twice, and deliberately each time. He started that fight, entirely of his own accord, and the problem with starting fights is you have to take what comes next.

[@ondrejkratochvil4589]

Just another clash between two adolescents - mental adolescents...

[@dlevi67]

Just mental.

[@andybloomer]

what I saw was the cam car driving too close (much less than 2 seconds based on using land marks and road markings to time the gap since the camera distorted the distance). Cammer became inpatient and conducted dangerous undertaking moves. Pulled out inappropriately when red Aygo pulled in prior to what would have been another dangerous undertake and then stopped short at the lights as he knew he'd done wrong and didn't want to make eye contact with the driver to the right. Suffered broken windscreen (Criminal damage etc.). However, probably wouldn't have escalated had the driver of the red car pulled in Do i win a prize?

[@harrybosch5720]

I work on the fact - that we all have to play together.. On the roads or anywhere.

[@cuprashoe]

The cam guys level of driving is appalling BUT doesn't warrant that

[@dobiqwolf]

I thought it was appalling as well but when rewatching it I changed my mind and realised it was dangerous driving, not just appalling.

[@cuprashoe]

@dobiqwolf 100% agree, I watched it again and the cam driver was an absolute tool, obviously didn't look in his mirrors once

[@WayneTulip-zm9gw]

1:08 he shouldn’t be passing the red car on the left hand side, he then does several quick lane changes, terrible driving.

[@danwyatt6703]

Thats the Wolverhampton Road to the west of Birmingham. Its a 40 limit with speed cameras. There's lots of left and right turns and cross roads so having to slow for other road users is a given. And its full of drivers like the cammer and the person breaking the window.

[@BETFRED1981]

Correct! I often avoid the Wolverhampton road because of bad drivers, so less stressful driving on the back roads.

[@Robbo511]

Even before the road rage incident actually began, I noticed the cam car getting closer and closer to the red car. The cam vehicle was impatient and twice moved out and blocked the red car. Nothing justifies the smashed window but this simply wouldnt have occured had the cam vehicle been more aware of their surroundings and checked their mirrors even when performing an undertake.

[@lr5777]

My own personal view of the situation: Initially, upon passing the white van in lane one, the driver of the red Focus probably should have moved left and let the camera car past. The red Focus driver's lane-hogging wound up the driver of the camera car who decided to undertake. Upon realising what was going on, the driver of the Focus accelerated in a clear attempt to prevent the camera car from passing on the left. A daft move, although the camera car driver was just as daft for continuing with the manoeuvre, eventually cutting sharply in front of the red Focus. What would have happened had the blue Hyundai in lane one at 1:09 performed an emergency stop? The aggressive manner in which the camera car approached the red Citroen wasn't good either. The driver of the red Citroen's initial lane discipline was poor, but they indicated left when the camera car approached from behind, and yet the camera car cut across to the inside lane anyway with a significant speed differential, clearly unsettling the driver of the red Citroen. The way the camera car suddenly slowed to match the speed of the red Citroen whilst sitting about a car length behind it invited them to move back into lane one, which they did. By this point, the red Focus was already approaching quickly in lane two, clearly about to overtake the camera car. This is where the driver of the camera car really disgraces themselves in my opinion. I'd like to give them the benefit of the doubt by saying that they failed to check their mirrors, but from how aggressively they swerved into lane two, I'm fairly confident the cut-up of the red Focus was deliberate. As they pulled up at the red light, the passenger window was partially open on the red Focus. At this point, the driver of the camera car actually did something sensible for the first and only time in this video by hanging back, presumably in an attempt to avoid verbal confrontation. Unfortunately for the camera driver, it was too late. The driver that they'd provoked turned out to be a psycho. Absolutely no excuse for getting out and smashing the window, but very little sympathy for the camera driver from me in this instance. Simply a case of when two idiots meet. It's just that one of the idiots hadn't anticipated how crazy the other one was! I wonder what the drivers behind made of it all. They all arrived at the traffic lights at the same time, presumably with a much lower heart rate and all their windows still intact. Hopefully this experience changes the camera car driver's attitude behind the wheel.

[@chrishart8548]

I don't think the cam car was even thinking about the red focus at all when he went around the Citroën. Looked to me like the Citroën caused the final meltdown. Looked like it held them both up and blocked the cam car from passing him.

[@allen_key]

The Citroen was using the lanes correctly. Moved out into lane 2 to pass a slowing car that was turning off to the left. They were in the process of returning to lane 1 but were hung out in lane 2 by the camera car sniffing and ultimately failing to undertake. They even held back to allow it. The camera was very much thinking about the Focus when rounding the Citroen, they just had to be in front of it regardless of anything, hence completing the dangerous move which meant the Focus had to slam on. Had the camera car just completed the undertake of the Citroen they may have avoided the window break as the previous move was far enough away from the Focus to be totally provoking.

[@dbracer]

It never ceases to amaze me that people send you videos like this one. What exactly are they expecting? Justification for their criminal behaviour? I knew where this was going based on the poor gap maintenance right from the start - it doesn't matter if the car in front can't maintain a constant speed, you shouldn't be allowing the gap to halve in size simply because you're either not paying attention or are "in a hurry". Still, turning a bit of anger at someone's inconsiderate driving into a criminal damage incident is dumb as rocks.

[@dobiqwolf]

what started as inconsiderate driving escalated to dangerous driving quickly, while the window smashing was deserved it was not justified.

[@Leo99929]

Unclear if the red estate was being intentionally obstructive at the beginning, but the cammer was impatient. Dangerous undertake. Dangerous changing of lanes on the attempted undertake of the little Citroen. But that's in part due to the Red estate who suddenly decided that they wanted to go MUCH faster than they were choosing to go before they got undertaken (making me question if it was intentional obstruction). The cammer should have waited until it was clear for the original red estate to pull over and let them past, then pass. The red estate could have pulled in if they weren't currently overtaking and there was space to pull in. Not clear why the red Citroen pulled into lane 2? Because the blue car slowed down to leave the carriageway? Might not have happened if they'd have pulled into the slip road/lane before slowing down, causing a speed differential resulting in the red Citroen pulling into lane 2, effectively locking an almost empty road to what every speed it was doing. Seems like the cammer and the red estate were both speeding at at least one point? Dangerous attempted undertake of the red Citroen by the cammer. Dangerous lane change by the cammer to cut up the red estate. That easily could have been a collision. At least the cammer did pull back in when clear to do so. Hot heads cause fires. Some courtesy from the red estate to pull over if not overtaking rather than "must be in front" mentality might have reduced the likely hood of this happening. Some patience from the cammer could have stopped thing escalating. Some courtesy from the car leaving the carriageway to use the slip lane to slow down might have reduced the tensions. Also maybe the red Citroen hadn't left a big enough gap in front of them? Some more pro-active lane changing back into lane one by the red Citroen might have helped reduce tensions/pressure for this type of behaviour. Some cool headedness from the red estate would have eliminated the almost crash as the cammer cut them up after they seem to have speeded up out of spite? Some patience and courtesy from the cammer to just wait for the red estate to pull in or pass, same for the red Citroen, would have prevented this whole exchange. When two selfish aggressive and inconsiderate people meet.

[@garethtaylor7437]

He stopped short of the white line. Clearly a sign that he had driven stupidly. And didnt want a sidewards glare.

[@liamrusselldrums]

'Make it a non-event' comes to mind ... both drivers clearly could have done a lot better. Second undertake by the cammer looked very close, but the red focus was triggered from the first undertake it seems. Expensive undertake to arrive at a red light first!

[@robertoulton7357]

Obviously, the other guy could hear his music

[@ibs5080]

At first I thought the reflection of the air vents in the windscreen was the actual break in the windscreen!

[@rufusgreenleaf2466]

Like a baseball sized hole

[@THEANPHROPY]

I have only watched to 01:20 thus bar but felt driven :::)) to communicate how shocking this drivers behaviour is: undertaking several times; often less than 2s behind a vehicle in front, all factors indicative of being impatient!!! Peace & Love!!!

[@matthewseymour8972]

That was really weird... Perfectly normal, reasonable driving and then suddenly mad dangerous passing for no adequately explained reason.

[@Nigelfarij]

He tailgates the guy in front right from the start. What's reasonable about that.

[@unsafevelocities5687]

That's what I thought initially, with the exception of the cammer's tailgating. However, I think we're both looking at traffic with calm minds. The cammer was like a pot slowly boiling over with frustration.

[@ParanoimiaUK]

That's what I thought. It was as if there was a change of driver halfway through.

[@matthewseymour8972]

@@Nigelfarij Huh.. maybe he does, I don't always see that with the camera angle. I still didn't see anything to trigger the mad behaviour

[@aspuzling]

I was so surprised when he just undertook the car. I thought he was following closely but not necessarily being aggressive.

[@Asto508]

1:10 was the first offense that may have been ignored by the window smasher, but the second offense at 1:24 tipped him over. As a side note, the music in the background gives me an accurate impression of the cammer, so consider me not surprised at all.

[@maxbacon4828]

Cam car was an Audi?.

[@rogerking7258]

A lane hogger and an undertaker who chops right back in front of the lane hogger. No prizes to anyone here.

[@allen_key]

Were they lane hogging? All staggered and spaced it seemed reasonable given they knew they were going ahead and cars may slow and peel off to the left. The focus checked their speed for the speed camera the red mist descended and the weaving commenced.

[@mrclaka6218]

Birmingham New Road between Oldbury and the Hagley Road, it's been a 40 limit there for decades. hardly lane hogging

[@JFHCudicini]

Earlier in the clip the red car is slower than left lane traffic only speeds up when being tailgated goes past the van and then slows down as you can see blue car is getting further ahead in left lane. Red car caused the road rage of cammer, who rather than wait patiently for a chance to overtake became equally as bad. Lane hoggers need points deducting from their license/have their license revoked for dangerous driving, guaranteed if you attempt to overtake a lane hogger they will speed up to prevent the overtake which leads to so many accidents. The red car is the type of driver that does 60-65mph in middle lane of a motorway when left lane is clear who will then proceed to accelerate upwards of 80mph if being overtaken by right lane traffic and if you then decide to pull in behind them because they are now moving they will just slow back down to 60mph again until you reattempt to overtake. It's highly dangerous driving and your left with 3 options either do 60mph and hold behind them in left lane as you can't legally undertake, infuriate the traffic behind by following them in the middle lane below the speed limit or continue to speed sometimes up to 90mph till you get past them in the right lane before then moving right over to the completely empty left lane.

[@allen_key]

What should the punishment be for tailgating? Arguably a more serious offence.

[@RiverMersey]

Cam car pulling up short at the lights - so that car windows weren't parallel - would suggest cam car had a good idea there was about to be some form of argument about to happen None of this was in anyway necessary - while not condoning any violence, arguably thankfully the only damage was the deliberately broken window Driving so close and at speeds like that could easily have turned over any of the road user's vehicles While these drivers were concentrating on this positional driving, they are distracting themselves from other dangers and hazards such as residential area vulnerable pedestrians

[@tin2001]

I feel like words were already being yelled as he passed... The stopping short seems sudden when the lead up braking was smooth. Also, it's possible whatever broke the window was being waved already as he approached, and he saw it. I'd brake hard if I saw someone lining up to throw a hammer out the window at my car too.

[@arga1966]

Dash cam driver got annoyed at the red car and acted very aggressively and cut in front the red car twice. Trying to teach him a leason but ended up with a broken window😂. Completely unnecessary from both parties. 😢😢

[@em0_tion]

"You reap what you sow." 🤷‍♂

[@johnobiro5202]

This is the way driving’s going today. People have no regard or respect for the law. We need more Police on the roads. Driving standards no longer exist. I’m a HGV Driver and I used to love driving but, todays Car drivers haven’t got a clue. They just go from A to B with Blinkers on in their own bubble. Make the Driving Tests include HGV Awareness. Make the Test harder and give the Police more Powers to catch the Idiots.

[@donaldasayers]

The cammer was driving rather aggressively and the red ford was being obstructive, I wonder if there had been previous interaction between them which led the ford driver not wanting to let the cam car past? The one I feel for was the driver of the little red Citroen who got harassed and undertaken when he was signalling left. Perhaps he was the culprit?

[@ConnorJMCD]

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

[@NoNeed2No]

Low IQ Reddit take