What ashoka did in Kalinga was a battle, on a battlefield where soldiers pledge to fight till last breath. On the contrary, Aurangzeb did mass killings, not on the battlefield but to the innocent people. Ashoka always obeyed the *kshatriya laws of war* , whereas any islamic invader didn't follow any of the *war rules* and mostly cheated and killed people outside the battlefield.
@aproudjagannathbhaktkaling60542 жыл бұрын
Lol kisne bola ki sirf battle tha itne soldiers to Kaling ke paas the hi nehi even pehle bhi jab Chandragupt Maurya ne attempt kiya tha Kaling ko capture karne ki to tab bhi sirf Khandayat(The Only Martial Caste in Kalinga) ladhte the na ki civilians aur Ashok ne lakhs of civilians maar diye ye massacre tha na ki battle . Tab ki Puri 3 Lakh ki population mai se kaha se more than Lakhs of Soldiers nikalega Kaling usme half to ladies pakad lo bache air budhe bhi honge kya baat kar rahe ho ki jo mare sab soldiers the 😁😁
@siberxcreative20672 жыл бұрын
💜🌟KALINGA WAR IS A FALSE STORY NOT HISTORY⭐ 👉ASHOK 13th PILAR INSCRIPTION(Regarding Kalinga War) Was FOUND Near AFGHANISTAN Nothing To Do With KALINGA UTKAL ODISHA. Again THERE is No Literature/NOTHING Found in ODISHA Regarding ASHOK. IT is a False Propaganda STORY Of Colonised Frozen Head RASCAL Historians To Minimize THE GREAT Chakrabarty SAMRAT MahaMeghabahan KHARAVEL The GREAT. WHEN Will Proud ODIYA Fight Against THIS False PROPAGANDA ???.......VANDE UTKAL JANANI/VHAARAT Mata Ki JAY.
@dhavaldesai6202 Жыл бұрын
You need to read about Jain massacre by Ashoka it's right there in his inscription also in one of his inscription he has said after the kalinga war that he has changed but he would do it again if it's necessary to crush rebaliions
@dhavaldesai6202 Жыл бұрын
Also I agree that aurangzeb did far worst things on basis of religion aurangzeb has class of his own in terms of dictator
@adithiarjun6764 Жыл бұрын
@@dhavaldesai6202 they will not hate ashoka But will hate aurangzeb People think ashoka was peaceful and spread Buddhism through peace But he massacred jains and hindus
@khalilgibran44842 жыл бұрын
These days sir's humour became too good 😂😂😂😂😂
@bakanani80402 жыл бұрын
1- Bindusara had 16 legal wives. 2- Sushima was crown prince. 3- Ashoka was helped by Radhagupta. 4- Sushima was burned alive in a pit of hot coal. 5- In his inscription he talks about his siblings and officers appointed for their service. 🙄 6- Ashoka in his old age was given half amla for his survival by Samprati. 😒 He was forced to starve to death. 7-Ashoka converted nations into Buddhism without using a single sword is definitely an achievement.
@charvaka57052 жыл бұрын
*Radhagupta was the disciple of Acharya Chanakya
@shirokun47422 жыл бұрын
Ashoka na jain or ajivika ka saath kya kiya jo buddhisam ka bare main bolte the tabh pata chalega
@bakanani80402 жыл бұрын
@@charvaka5705 it is said he maybe have been his son or grandson but no proof regarding that 🙄
@charvaka57052 жыл бұрын
@@bakanani8040 Acharya Chanakya despised women....he himself writes in the Neetishastra that "women is the most destructive and most unloyal thing a man could have", plus it is also known that he was a Brahmachari..this view of his is only on political matters, and him being politician it is very understanding of why he doesn't truest anyone other than his disciple.
@bakanani80402 жыл бұрын
@@charvaka5705 🙄😒 Uhm woah 😒I don't know what to say.
@myourdad22712 жыл бұрын
The main thing is Ashoka is not praised for his cruelty, the way he turned his life and actually followed dharma and stopped his cruelty, is what makes him great. Aurangzeb was clearly a criminal minded guy, and there is no way one can admire him, even the Mughal rule was handed to him already set up across North India. Ashoka ended his life having learnt that killings of thousands does not make an emperor great, but taking care of people does. So he stopped his blind inclination towards extending boundaries and this was something that actually made him a great person and a great ruler
@Hi5Ripon2 жыл бұрын
At least Ashoka should be credited for building a large empire that put Indian Subcontinent on the world stage despite his imperfections. Just as Chinggiz Khan is praised despite him and his people killing nearly 50 million people during their conquest
@umbrellacorporation57232 жыл бұрын
Samrat ChandraGupta Maurya , Samrat Ashoka, samrat Samudra Gupta fought to reunite Bharat under one single Empire to make Bharat a Great , A superpower. So that no other foreign power can do invasion into india. Just look at our history whenever india was fragmented under many small kingdoms india got invade. But when Bharat was unite under one single Empire like " The Great Mauryan Empire ", under "Gupta Empire " under the rein of Emperor Ashoka, Emperor ChandraGupta, Emperor Samudra Gupta no foreign invaders ever dared to attack india. We made Alexander to lose the war against india , because we had United Bharat under one single Empire ( The Mauryan Empire) , if India would have remained fragmented with different kingdoms Alexander would have invade india. We stopped the scythians , huns , Sakas , Greeks and many other invaders just because we united Bharat under one single Empire. Samrat Vikramaditya single handedly destroyed sakas because our Bharat was not Fragmented under many kingdoms. Thats why he's known as the samrat of Universe Vikramaditya become a brand, A title which every kings and Emperor wanted to achieve, but only certain kings and Emperor got the Title of Vikramaditya like Samrat Samudra Gupta.
@sampatkalyan31032 жыл бұрын
I guess Samarat Asoka were cruel to those people who were not law abiding or dharmic, people who did a ahdarhama.
@shantisadan8888 Жыл бұрын
@@umbrellacorporation5723 yes and this thing many peoples don't even today understand and they fight with each other and you forgot to mention that even british conquered india the same fragmented way
@bakanani80402 жыл бұрын
When sir spoke in Spanish accent , it was just amazing 😂
@ayushtiwari29592 жыл бұрын
Spanish? I thought that was Italian
@nizk02 жыл бұрын
I thought French
@NOBODY-j7z2 жыл бұрын
It sounds like Italian.
@suryaprabhapillalamarri54612 жыл бұрын
@@nizk0 he is from France
@suryaprabhapillalamarri54612 жыл бұрын
@@ayushtiwari2959 he is from france
@ReligioCritic2 жыл бұрын
Though Ashoka was nothing in front of Aurangzeb(in terms of persecuting other religions), still Ashoka wasn't a saint either. Ashoka was very cruel and wiped out the entire sect called Ajivikas. Ashoka is often called the greatest of all Mauryan Kings, which i do not agree with, the greatest Mauryan King was Chandragupt Maurya and Bindusara(he is the most under rated king).
@BHARATHA-SAMPRAJYA2 жыл бұрын
When someone says Ashoka the great is nothing in front of aurangzeb, understand that he is an anti Modi element also , who got burnt in the butt , Aurangzeb couldn't even destroy Marathas
@ghs892 жыл бұрын
I hate both Ashoka and auranzeb
@BHARATHA-SAMPRAJYA2 жыл бұрын
@@ghs89 Abe tu fake hindu hai na , mene dekha hai tujhe hindu virodhi comments likhthe hue , tu kya hate karega
@ReligioCritic2 жыл бұрын
@@BHARATHA-SAMPRAJYA Hey Dumbo, i was saying Ashoka the not so great was nothing in front of Aurangzeb in terms of the persecution of other religions and not in terms of greatness.....Now, i have edited the original comment so that Dumbos like you could understand.
@umbrellacorporation57232 жыл бұрын
Samrat ChandraGupta Maurya , Samrat Ashoka, samrat Samudra Gupta fought to reunite Bharat under one single Empire to make Bharat a Great , A superpower. So that no other foreign power can do invasion into india. Just look at our history whenever india was fragmented under many small kingdoms india got invade. But when Bharat was unite under one single Empire like " The Great Mauryan Empire ", under "Gupta Empire " under the rein of Emperor Ashoka, Emperor ChandraGupta, Emperor Samudra Gupta no foreign invaders ever dared to attack india. We made Alexander to lose the war against india , because we had United Bharat under one single Empire ( The Mauryan Empire) , if India would have remained fragmented with different kingdoms Alexander would have invade india. We stopped the scythians , huns , Sakas , Greeks and many other invaders just because we united Bharat under one single Empire. Samrat Vikramaditya single handedly destroyed sakas because our Bharat was not Fragmented under many kingdoms. Thats why he's known as the samrat of Universe Vikramaditya become a brand, A title which every kings and Emperor wanted to achieve, but only certain kings and Emperor got the Title of Vikramaditya like Samrat Samudra Gupta.
@RoneetDhiman2 жыл бұрын
"Your Masters in US".......😂😂😂
@_Mohit_Joshi2 жыл бұрын
Aurangzeb had taken an oath, that he would not wear his crown back until he ends the Maratha kingdom. The Marathas then never let him wear his crown back, they didn't even allowed him to return to Delhi. He died in Maharashtra's soil itself. Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj's death revenge was taken. And later people like Peshwa Bajirao ended the Mughal Empire, and the Maratha kingdom was now the MARATHA EMPIRE we all respect today.
@virajkhairnar3692 жыл бұрын
Maratha Empire was the greatest mediaeval age empire of India.
@aryanpandey82622 жыл бұрын
What about third battle of Panipat
@cringelord15402 жыл бұрын
@@science4940 uhh okay...nice joke I guess?
@samthegamer49102 жыл бұрын
@@science4940 🤮 this is what your comment deserves!
@jaymeensinhparmar27852 жыл бұрын
@@virajkhairnar369 only chatrpati rule was great…once peshwa came to power just read about atrocities they have done in bengal odisha Gujarat
@defendersofindia54862 жыл бұрын
Ashoka= Indian Aurangzeb = Descendent of foreigner (Babur) You decide who we Indians should honour.
@umbrellacorporation57232 жыл бұрын
Remember one thing Bloodlines and hereditary doesn't matter , what matters is culture and civilization. Aurangazeb was neither of Indian Ancestry, neither was of indian culture and civilization. Aurangazeb went on to wipe out indian culture and civilization. And imposed a foreign, barbaric religion upon Indians. Emperor Ashoka promoted Indian culture and civilization, Buddhism is an indian culture and civilization. Buddhism is our culture not a foreign culture. Emperor Kaniskha The Great was not of Indian Origin, but he embraced Indian culture and civilization and worked for India's interest and promoted indian culture and civilization, because of him today, China, Korea, Mongolia, Japan has Buddhism as their Official culture. So culture and civilization matters. Aurangazeb was neither following indian culture or civilization
@defendersofindia54862 жыл бұрын
@@rehankhan1778 only a little bit 😂
@gigachad24192 жыл бұрын
King Ashoka>>>>>Thief Aurangzeb
@GianHainAap.2 жыл бұрын
Even though I'm a Muslim, but i also hate Aurangzeb and Mughals I'm from Maharashtra my idol is Chatrapati Shri Shivaji Maharaj 🚩👑
@dracckun2 жыл бұрын
🔥
@sanki84462 жыл бұрын
🔥🚩🔱
@Jay-sq3ge2 жыл бұрын
I think only Shivaji was chatrapati later his descendants were not good. And you all should know that Akbar was worse than aurangazeb
@txse7en7722 жыл бұрын
@@Jay-sq3ge Later descendants were not good🤡Absolute clown moment….have you ever in your life read about Marathas after demise of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj ? Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj literally saved Maratha empire from tyrant Aurangzeb. Aurangzeb’s army was 5 lakh+ and Maratha total army was like 60-70 thousand. Still Aurangzeb failed. After unfortunate tortures death(He accepted death instead of Islam). Marathas had no King for 27 years. There was only one queen Ie Tara Rani. Still Aurangzeb failed to conquer Maratha land and lost war of 27 years and died in Marathas land without his crown. From now on just think before saying anything about Shree Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj descendants.
@sayanbaidya31612 жыл бұрын
@@Jay-sq3ge bro have u read about Sambhaji maharaj
@rajatchopra14112 жыл бұрын
0:24 replay button Watched it a Hundred time 😂
@dwij19242 жыл бұрын
Spanish xd 😂
@aniket16382 жыл бұрын
Yes😅
@darkknight68412 жыл бұрын
Thanks @RAJAT CHOPRA I was looking for this👌😁😂
@aadarsh_1303x2 жыл бұрын
@@dwij1924 Italian expression
@desiDJ9092 жыл бұрын
Can be my next meme template 😁
@SKSingh-pd4pk2 жыл бұрын
Ashoka was surely great!! but I think he overrated! (all thanks to nehru) Chandragupta Maurya & chanakya deserve more appreciation than him, they started from 0 & made a mighty empire whereas ashoka got everything directly in hand & also: Ashoka very well followed chanakya neeti during his reign but like 2 years before the kalinga war he became influenced by buddhism or some sources say it was for minority appeasement like what congress does now & after the war, he left doing invasions.... now this is where the problem arise he started making his new laws to give buddhists privilege & ignored chankya neetis + arthashastra which was for goodness of empire, this is where everything goes wrong.... his successors were even more dumb they were brutally brainwashed by buddhist monks all thanks to Pushyamitra Shunga who killed weak king brihadrath + revived sanatan dharma again (real one) & all also saved india from greek invasions
@aproudjagannathbhaktkaling60542 жыл бұрын
My name suits for your worthy comment 👍👍👍
@anuragtungsten54242 жыл бұрын
@@aproudjagannathbhaktkaling6054 Mauryan Empire still remains India's biggest empire lol
@aproudjagannathbhaktkaling60542 жыл бұрын
@@anuragtungsten5424 Lmao not even 100 years in the history of multi-thousands of years & we all know within 500 years after Gupta dynasty what was the condition of Magadh or modern day Bihar 🤣🤣. I can easily troll with logics but for your kind information at that time when I commented it my ID name was "TheUnderrated1" which I wrote to patch for Chandragupt Maurya the real Underrated1& worthy versatile ruler of Bharatvarsh
@_Mohit_Joshi2 жыл бұрын
Samrat Ashok was good, but not his descendants. They were brainwashed by Buddhist monks, and started neglecting their warrior duties. (Similar to what Gandhi "Ji" did to our grandfather's generation). Thankful to Samrat Pushyamitra Shunga for being the civilization's savior.
@simple22242 жыл бұрын
Bas kar haando
@sanjeevdas83692 жыл бұрын
Pushyamitra is Actually good But Buddhist shows Him a Tyrant also indo Greek Kingdoms only promote Greeks Language and Hellenic culture but still Buddhist Support them Because the Followed Buddhism
@AnuragKumar-mh7ov2 жыл бұрын
*I feel very sad when some indian people do not believe in Indians but they do believe in american organizations like new york times & others.*
@manikkaul20282 жыл бұрын
#AskAbhijit I am a Kashmiri Pandit, and I want you to explain the detailed history of Kashmir and Kashmiri pandits from ancient history.
@dmnxexotic0p552 жыл бұрын
@@science4940 Chudhals 😆😆 lol
@manikkaul20282 жыл бұрын
@@science4940 Hlo madarsachap baat sunn, history of Kashmir is older than Islam itself. Islam tab paida bhi nhi hova tha Jab Kashmir tha
@cringelord15402 жыл бұрын
That'd be great actually, hope he notices this
@franky73882 жыл бұрын
@@science4940 where the hell are you reading such bullshit stuff
@chandraguptamaurya51522 жыл бұрын
Ashoka is a morally grey character like most Emperors He was an effecient leader but controversial
@WarWarWar40492 жыл бұрын
He wasnt efficient either. You should read more about him.
@nitishnayak10052 жыл бұрын
the story of Ashoka's Shivism and budhisam stories are fabricated...... Ashoka was a budhist before Kalinga war.
@rehanphalswal2 жыл бұрын
Any source?
@theblackone_2 жыл бұрын
@@rehanphalswal Ashokan edicts itself
@nitishnayak10052 жыл бұрын
@@rehanphalswal his own inscriptions....He sent his Son and daughter to spread budhisam before Kalinga war.
@technoyamraj2 жыл бұрын
And also see the previous videos of Abhijit sir .... He also had proved that Ashoka was a Buddhist before Kalinga war .... And he even killed the ajivikas after he adopted Buddhism ...
@nitishnayak10052 жыл бұрын
@@technoyamraj yes
@Bond-Tanzy2 жыл бұрын
Your critical and comparative analysis of these two historical kings is rightfully accurate 👍
@hshzhhshshshshs80922 жыл бұрын
I am just soooooo thankful to God that at last I found my true teacher(मार्ग दर्शक). Thankyou from the realty of my heart.🙏💙🙇
@coolbro42302 жыл бұрын
Just love guruji rebuttal 😂
@aditibhardwaj8790 Жыл бұрын
One correction - ashoka was son of the king from last wife, ashok and his mother was mocked by his step-siblings all lifelong. Ashok used to win in all archery competitions, thats made his siblings more furious. At a time when ashoka's siblings United to kill ashoka and his mother. Its then ashoka killed them all. Anybody would do so to protect his old aged mother
@ravishankarsingh65662 жыл бұрын
Sir I am requesting you to make a video on history of Latin America Please sir
@ansumaanpatnaik742 жыл бұрын
One was an internal tyrant, one was an external tyrant One was Buddhist, one was Muslim One wiped out Ajivika, one wiped out Brahmins One fought with Kalinga, one fought with Maratha He won the bloody war, he lost the bloody war He is called the great by Indians, he is called the great by Pakistanis ...𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗸𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗛𝗶𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘀...
@ramanshujha29452 жыл бұрын
@I love Xinjiang ajivika were a sramanic hindu sect
@franky73882 жыл бұрын
One worked for India other destroyed India
@simple22242 жыл бұрын
@I love Xinjiang kyu
@ghs892 жыл бұрын
@@ramanshujha2945 hinduism is Vedic not sramanic
@sanjeevdas83692 жыл бұрын
Ansumaan You're 100% true Ashoka is Overrated He didn't even expand his Empire So Much Because During Chandragupta Time Mauryans Ruled Whole Indian Sub Continent except Kaling and Southern part of Tamil And Kerala,Kalinga... We can see How after Ashoka maurya Empire died Because Ashoka Spended whole Royal Treasure to Promote Buddhism which Lead to the collapse of The Whole Civilization and allowed Greeks to Take Advantage
@pratikchakraborty63542 жыл бұрын
Abhijit sir has such a way with words ❤️
@alonewalker26262 жыл бұрын
Sir,it is still said in odisha that there is not even a single family from which atleast one of its member didn't die in the great Kalinga war.
@kallurianagha37048 ай бұрын
Chandragupta maurya is actually the greatest emperor and Acharya Chanakya is the greatest personality they are very underrated Ashoka is overrrated af
@69GrimReaper2 жыл бұрын
#AskAbhijit Sir do you think Bollywood is spoiling the youth ? It is glorifying smoking , drinking and all sort of immoral behaviours rather than depicting the true culture of India.
@SP-wg9bb2 жыл бұрын
True would love if sir talks about the SOFT POWER of india and what can or should be done to improve it
@ayushtiwari29592 жыл бұрын
He wasn't lying when he said he has a short temper. Lol that first sequence was...idk, unusual.
@MukeshVarma91982 жыл бұрын
Ashok ne apne 100 brothers ki hatya ki ye baat sirf ek Sri Lanka book Aarya Manju moolkalpa me likhi gyi hai jo ki 12th century me likhi gyi. Esliye ye baat historical fact nahi hai
@slomojohnjoshi59902 жыл бұрын
In my opinion, Ashoka the Great is not only the greatest emperor of India but also one of the greatest emperors in the world. No lesser than Cyrus the Great of Persia and Augustus Ceaser of Roma.
@mohammedamaan53972 жыл бұрын
None of them successfully sieged Constantinople in their lives Not talking about Ashoka he's too far from that place But Cyrus was not so far from the city It should be considered the biggest milestone in the history to successful seige of Constantinople
@sakshamsingh99432 жыл бұрын
That no no no no no was very very funny 😭😂😂😂
@hindurashtra632 жыл бұрын
In Rajatarangini (Encyclopedia of Kings of Kashmir), The Court Historian - Kalhana tells us that Ashoka had built 4 Great Shiva Temples (After he accepted Buddhism) in 4 Corners of India. One of those was in Kashmir. We hear about Kalhana's complains about how the Mahadeva Temple in Kashmir is in ruins in his Era (1200s) and that the Lauhitya Kings were not managing it properly.
@ksstubhsonawane2 жыл бұрын
Namaskar. What happened to the Spanish Empire. How did they fall from being the strongest power in Central America to being irrelevant in the 19th century? How did Spain manage to avoid playing a major role in the 2 World Wars. Why did they not jump on the opportunity?
@sadgamya2 жыл бұрын
No no no... What do say Miguel Diaz 🤣🤣🤣
@rahultawar85322 жыл бұрын
#askabhijit In one video sir you said that it would be better having civil war than a partition But the results of that can also be devastated of having more fragmented India when there is strong leadership
@bhavyadevsinghcharan58492 жыл бұрын
SIR.. Would Like to Ask You The History Of The Charans/ चारण (the Historian and poets Who are known to have Mythological / Shiva Origin ) .. Pls Give some Explanation #Askabhijit Pls Sir ...
@amitkumararya22612 жыл бұрын
Good morning
@deepak-dhankhar2 жыл бұрын
Hahaha the accent 😂😂 PS - Yes Sir, by the time Ashok was born, Bindusara had thrown out Chanakya as he blamed him(chanakya) for his wife's demise.
@lakshamb2 жыл бұрын
Mother's demise... wife of chandragupta maurya
@tivky2 жыл бұрын
Aurangzeb also established Sharia Law in India. Just look around the world today where Sharia Law is active and then imagine the horrific situation our Bharat was in his time. He was hell bent to convert every Indian.
@yashverma52932 жыл бұрын
@@fardinahmed3389 well dude...the ratio of native arabs is itself very low.. Compared to that of western population who migrated there 😂 alll those technology is given by american and european to your arab... Comeon untill 60s they didnt even knew that the black liquid was actually oil it were the brits who told the... And well now kweping aside the middle east.... Lets talk about those other islamic nations where sharia is active.... Yes we can see that how much developed they are lol 😂😂😂 they just crossed us in terms of economy right!.... Madarsa graduated person like you love to live in his own delusions even after knowing they contributed nothing towards humanity 😂😂😂😂😂😂...
@sameersinha13302 жыл бұрын
Chavda sir op After jaishankar we need him as our external affairs minister
@taraprasadswain7332 жыл бұрын
Sir what do you think about Alha Udal the commanders of Raja parimal
@subhashsahay52182 жыл бұрын
Ashoka is respected for his legacy. His legacy was Buddhism's rise and overall beginning of Classical Indian Civilization. He was very brutal but why do you expect Rāma like king? All great emperors of past who united and laid foundations of Civilizations were brutal. Genghis Khan, Alexander, Ashoka, Qin shi Huangdi, Julius Caesar. Don't look at them from moral perspective. Moreover, please understand Emperors like Chhatrapati Shivājī are rare happenings. So are Maharana Pratap and Sultan Ayyubi and First Caliphs in particular the Rashiduns. If you look towards kings of past with this much idealism, you will not read even a per cent of history. Even Rajendra Chola was a brutal king then and you should not respect them. Cholas should not be respected at all if you look at history morally. They destroyed Anuradhapura, almost decimated Buddhism in Sri Lanka, invaded Southeast Asia, had brutal taxation methods. Remember them via legacies and not actions. And in that case, Ashoka is, along with previous two rulers, greatest Emperors of India. Being a Bihari, they are our pride and proof of our civilisational heritage and importance.
@mohammedamaan53972 жыл бұрын
Brother I think u r right bout Shivaji and maharana pratap But I disagree with u on First Caliphs they participated in wars but they weren't brutal I think u should read bout them before making claims
@subhashsahay52182 жыл бұрын
Yes they were not to that level, I withdraw my statement.
@suvrajitsaha16472 жыл бұрын
#AskAbhijit. Sir, please talk about the nine books of Ashoka
@aadarsh_1303x2 жыл бұрын
0:24 that's why we love you
@sudhamishra65962 жыл бұрын
ashoka accepted buddhism 2 years before the Kalinga war
@বঙ্গাধিপতি2 жыл бұрын
The greatest Mauryan was Chandragupta Maurya and the greatest misconception regarding him is that he adopted Jaina way of life abandoning vaidic dharma. But that's not true. Acharya Bhadrabahu,a jaina sanyasi 2300 years ago led the jaina way of life adoption ritual to King Chandragupt"i" (the king of Ujjain) which is mentioned in "Bhadrabahu Charitra" by Acharya Ratnanandi. It was not Chandragupt"a" who was the ruler from Magadh (capital Pataliputra).
@devshah4192 жыл бұрын
@abhijit chavda sir can u shed some light on the great king Samprati (Ashoka's grandson) who had vast kingdom across india and was a spreader of Jainism in India.
@aakashuikey7782 жыл бұрын
The Great Ashoka 🚩💪 aurangzeb to coward tha sambhaji maharaj ko dhoke se marvaya tha usne.
@mylord81052 жыл бұрын
So Ashoka was a Buddhist even before the Kalinga war and not otherwise as portrayed by our History textbooks
@mylord81052 жыл бұрын
@@someonejustsomeone1469 Actually our textbooks say that Ashoka converted to Buddhism after the Kalinga war.
@AryanMahipal2 жыл бұрын
Fact -( someone might think its funfact ) Bharat was the biggest in the reign of Ashoka compared to any other ruler ever ruled the subcontinent .
@_Mohit_Joshi2 жыл бұрын
Samrat Ashok was a great emperor. The only fault I see in him, is the spread of Buddhism. Although Ashoka diligently followed Kshatriyatva even after converting to Buddhism, but the monks and his descendants took undue advantage of the Buddhist ahimsa principles, and dropped their warriorhood. Samrat Brihadratha is the example. Had Samrat Pushyamitra Shunga not taken over, Greek invasion was inevitable. I don't hate Samrat Ashok, and we can't blame him for the fault of his descendants, but, he deserves blame for spreading Buddhism.
@shirokun47422 жыл бұрын
Jain ajivika ka saath jo kiya ashoka na or hinduo priests 3rd class log bangaye the.......... pehla wo padh
@utkarsh1442 жыл бұрын
@@shirokun4742 Aurangzeb ne jo massacre kiye vo galat h par Ashoka ne jo kiya vo sab jayaz h in logo k liye
@utkarsh1442 жыл бұрын
@@thotslayer4949 Um no, all kinds of things were normal in the past, but if you want to praise a sadistic mass murderer then go on
@virajkhairnar3692 жыл бұрын
@@utkarsh144You have Colonial mindset
@umbrellacorporation57232 жыл бұрын
Samrat ChandraGupta Maurya , Samrat Ashoka, samrat Samudra Gupta fought to reunite Bharat under one single Empire to make Bharat a Great , A superpower. So that no other foreign power can do invasion into india. Just look at our history whenever india was fragmented under many small kingdoms india got invade. But when Bharat was unite under one single Empire like " The Great Mauryan Empire ", under "Gupta Empire " under the rein of Emperor Ashoka, Emperor ChandraGupta, Emperor Samudra Gupta no foreign invaders ever dared to attack india. We made Alexander to lose the war against india , because we had United Bharat under one single Empire ( The Mauryan Empire) , if India would have remained fragmented with different kingdoms Alexander would have invade india. We stopped the scythians , huns , Sakas , Greeks and many other invaders just because we united Bharat under one single Empire. Samrat Vikramaditya single handedly destroyed sakas because our Bharat was not Fragmented under many kingdoms. Thats why he's known as the samrat of Universe Vikramaditya become a brand, A title which every kings and Emperor wanted to achieve, but only certain kings and Emperor got the Title of Vikramaditya like Samrat Samudra Gupta.
@Satyam1010-N2 жыл бұрын
People only link mauryan with bhuddist but they forget the linage of many rajputs like sisodiya and chitorghad , i am Hindu we have no connections with bhuddist now confusion comes one same sect of people following different path so this might have happened in royal family too , Ashoka might have bhuddhism but many people in family must be hardcore Vedic .
@tushark9182 жыл бұрын
Abhijit sir please explain about Kamrupa Kingdom #AskAbhijit
@poojamanchanda70602 жыл бұрын
The thumbnail says it all !!
@silentthinker93862 жыл бұрын
Sigma Ashoka>>>>>>>beta Aurangzeb
@user-rb1ek7gx9r2 жыл бұрын
well said sir🔥
@SanjuSanju-me2tn2 жыл бұрын
Excellent sir thank you 🤗
@aryanpandey82622 жыл бұрын
#AskAbhijit was sambhaji a womanizer as discussed by savarkar in his book?
@satodalkarmakar6802 жыл бұрын
that "No, no, no, no..." got me XD
@rajatsingh50812 жыл бұрын
#AskAbhijit sir in beer biceps show you told about various leaders of america how were they what they were doing when in power could you plzz make such video on our leaders since indepedence
@ositoramen49962 жыл бұрын
0:25 evil spirit of being wise
@madhusinghdw2 жыл бұрын
Nicely explained
@Aeyo2 жыл бұрын
The fundamental difference between Ashoka and Aurangzeb is, Ashoka admitted his flaws but latter was blinded by faith syndrome. #TellAbhijit
@vishnupillai13362 жыл бұрын
Well said
@ShivagamiDevi2 жыл бұрын
Sir can you please make a video about the truth of indo aryans and dravidians theory including the people and languages as well as north indian languages belong to the indo aryan language family and south Indian to the dravidian so people think north indians are aryans and south indians are dravidians. Can you please explain when n what people came to India first and why is this aryan dravidian divide
@irondisulfide74802 жыл бұрын
Sir has already written an article on falsity of AIT, you can check it on internet.
@chinmayamohapatra63092 жыл бұрын
Ashoka was by no means a saint . Please look in to the battle of Kalinga that had happened hundreds of years ago but people still fear to talk about it.. As i belong from Odisha and I learn history I also know a very little, like there was a war between Ashoka and Odia Paika warriors , and it happened at the bank of river Daya and the river was colored red with blood.
@hariharbramha2 жыл бұрын
Mauryan umpire had started decline in askokas time , he destroy mauryan tressury he acted opposite direction of chankyas economic policy
@swamichaudhari69322 жыл бұрын
#AskAbhijit Sir proxima centauri coming towards earth 🌍?
@hindupati_1082 жыл бұрын
There is no comparison between Ashoka The Great and aunrangBAD 😌
@abhinavsharma21392 жыл бұрын
0:26 🤣🤣
@jsoth26752 жыл бұрын
Is it certain that he unified the entire subcontinent? That seems like a bit of a stretch.
@mohit51652 жыл бұрын
That spanish accent got me dying😭
@thehiddenmartin2 жыл бұрын
Because of Ashoka , India almost became a budhist country as rulers after him practiced budhism but then one of their senapati killed the king and welcomed hinduism back , did ashwamegh yagh and reunified hindu rulers back . i forgot his name
@winself2 жыл бұрын
But in a previous video you had called Ashok a " viscous mass murderer "
@jeanniemaycrawford44662 жыл бұрын
He is but compartivly, he's a saint
@greatsir432 жыл бұрын
He is the best king this Universe has ever produced.
@grahamsmith53962 жыл бұрын
Correct me if I'm wrong! Ashoka was willing and able to admit when he was wrong and then tried to correct his behavior and actions, for tge betterment of his society. Thats a great leader. If I'm wrong on this, show me .
@SKSingh-pd4pk2 жыл бұрын
#AskAbhijit what was the role of Pushyamitra shunga in Indian history, please mention his war against greek also was he a patriot who protected his motherland or a betrayer who killed his own king brihadratha?
@RehanShaikh-tu8qk2 жыл бұрын
But technically aurangzeb also did everything for his culture to prospere if you are telling ashoka that he did everything to prospere Indian culture then so did aurangzeb for his culture. From a indian patriotic perspective aurangzeb was wrong but if you think about it rationally he should also be admired. Because he did same as ahoka if not more
@itachigara45392 жыл бұрын
@@shivmalik9405 what do you think people at that time used to do...travelling and conquering lands was their main thing...they were not going to schools and studying moral science...either criticize boths killings or no ones
@RehanShaikh-tu8qk2 жыл бұрын
@@itachigara4539 Right. On the contrary ashoka was capable of only conquering and defending the land he belonged to but aurangzeb and other Muslims conquerer or people like Alexander not only defended their land but also went out to explore and conquere other lands. They where more capable than Indian rulers. Not that I hate Indian rulers I am from India only, but I am just speaking from a rational point of view.
@संजयपालडींया2 жыл бұрын
Ashok didn't lead genocide in Greece and Sri Lanka to spread his culture. And what culture did Aurangzeb spread. He only spread Hatered for Hindus. Note- I have no hate for Muslims.
@RehanShaikh-tu8qk2 жыл бұрын
@@संजयपालडींया Bro his persian culture he spread in Indian subcontinent. Aurangzeb is not the best guy I know but taking him and blaming to mughal rulers like akbar is wrong. He was an excellent statesmen and ruler
@itachigara45392 жыл бұрын
@@RehanShaikh-tu8qk rather Ashoka massacred lakhs of people of his own country for attaining largest pieces of lands...had the religion of people he conquered be different than his own it's common sense he would have also enforced his religion on them...also in the end he himself followed Buddhism so clearly he was not satisfied with his religion of birth..and again i will say you should either criticize both of their killings or noones
@vickydonor59222 жыл бұрын
Sorry to watch u taking defensive approach since beginning. That crypto guy spoons propaganda from the very 2nd line of his question i.e Ashoka never war after becoming Baudh...lol Debunk: 270 BCE: Ashoka's anointing 265 BCE: Ashoka 'CONVERTS' to become a 'BUDDHIST' 261 BCE: Ashoka conquers 'KALINGA'😂😂😂😂 233 BCE: Ashoka dies Rice bag's propaganda that Ashoka not raged a war after conversion is just a leftist propaganda which is as always koti koti yojanas away from the facts. Chavda ji you must counter these propagandist with fact otherwise they are experts in playing victim card.😂
@loneshvann69842 жыл бұрын
Now a days islaam has become joke. 🤣
@keshava470 Жыл бұрын
This video in a nutshell “as long as the barbarian is dharmic he is Chavda approved “
@biswajit1407 Жыл бұрын
ofourse any barbaric who regrets his crime and follows dharma is always greater than a barbaric who always remained barbaric.
@Devildk12 жыл бұрын
Once, a great man said oh no no no no no no no no no🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@aryansharma249 Жыл бұрын
#askabhijit if you think that Ashoka was overall a great emperor then you should reconsider the fact that he killed his own brothers , jains , avika sect , made above 1 lakh + prisoners of war in the battle of Kalinga , he wasn't personally influenced by any form of dharm , and even for his political domination in history he propagated a diluted product of sanatan dharm that is Buddhism which is still creating havoc in our country and among sanatanis . In the end his whole empire was narrowed down. "And to correct you chanakya would have died again after seeing the acts of your so called #greatashoka ". We should even redesign our national flag and national emblem to remove ashoka as great ruler from our mindset . Jai shree ram 🙏🏻🙏🏻🚩🚩
@KaalRig2 ай бұрын
Jai ho
@vladimir_biden2 жыл бұрын
Guruji , Start making shorts for more reach 🙏🙏🙏
@the_skilled_scalpel2 ай бұрын
Nice sir ❤
@Facist_Sanghi_BHWS.member2 жыл бұрын
Don't compare Ashoka The Great with bullshit Aurangzeb
@TONYSTARK-uy9nv2 жыл бұрын
Buslim be like:- 🥺
@abhisheksumanAS2 жыл бұрын
Bindusara had further expanded and Kalinga was already a vassal state which had claimed freedom during the interregnum war of Ashoka and his brothers. Sir, kindly check the Mahamaatra system he had imposed. It was like a micro-management system of bureaucracy like India became after freedom in 1947. A huge portion of revenue was spent just maintaining the bureaucracy, and it was not meritocracy. His ventures caused the Mauryan Empire to collapse very soon after his death, just like Aurangzeb's emptying of coffers and killing of soldiers in Deccan did for Mughals. Also, he did wage war after becoming Buddhist and Kalinga was fought after he had become Buddhist. He had done a lot of things considered barbaric from the standards of that time. Nonetheless, overall he still wanted to serve people despite the mismanagement and violence. And he did more good than bad. So yeah, I agree with you on that.
@juss2fr3sh2 жыл бұрын
Would love to see a friendly debate with you and Adnan Rashid. Make it happen
@ChandranPrema1232 жыл бұрын
#AskAbhijit there is Caste system among Muslim and Christian people in Kerala from My experience. I'm a Malayalee person and pls give more evidences on that
@nyomansudarma17315 ай бұрын
Do you know ..one princes from kalingga .,develove her kingdom in java ..,her is prince Shimha.. ,,and seven rishi came to bali island .
@mrsamratbanerjee2 жыл бұрын
Well I often wonder how it became possible that people like Aurangzeb succeeded in making such a massacre and were left alive! I mean how he didn't face resistance!
@kumaraadityanath74912 жыл бұрын
He faced resistance by Shivaji , Sambhaji and Guru Govind Singh.
@charvaka57052 жыл бұрын
Half of india was revolting against him.
@_Mohit_Joshi2 жыл бұрын
Ofcourse he faced resistance. Guerrilla warfare was always resisting the invader Mughals. Mughals NEVER ruled entirety of Bharat. Even in the areas shown as Mughal territories, there were warriors like Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, the Ahoms, Raja Chhatrasal, etc using guerilla warfare to end the Mughal invasion.
@_Mohit_Joshi2 жыл бұрын
Aurangzeb had taken an oath, that he would not wear his crown back until he ends the Maratha kingdom. The Marathas then never let him wear his crown back, they didn't even allowed him to return to Delhi. He died in Maharashtra's soil itself. Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj's death revenge was taken. And later people like Peshwa Bajirao ended the Mughal Empire, and the Maratha kingdom was now the MARATHA EMPIRE we all respect today.
@technoyamraj2 жыл бұрын
He faced harsh resistant and also escaped from death many times .... But the LEFTIST HISTORIANS concealed all the history and facts related to RESISTANCE against aurangzeb ....
@basedtsar94402 жыл бұрын
Well both pictures are same
@durgaprasadpandey96072 жыл бұрын
Sar aap bahut hi logically video banate hain ek video Sar aap Misra Mein islamikaran ke upar aur pyramids ke upar bhi banaen Hindi mein thank u
@jeneralbrigader84782 жыл бұрын
#ask mao Zedong did not have good views towards India but what do you think about him in comparison to many Indian leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru as he was more moral to his own country's benefit
@Drunkush2 жыл бұрын
#AskAbhijit Is Russia far behind Turkey (and even Iran) in drone technology? The US recently accused Iran of supplying hundreds of drones to Russia. There were also reports that Russians have been using DJI consumer drones for military purposes in the ongoing conflict.
@Chandan-uz6yj2 жыл бұрын
Ooo sir you are like the Baluu from Jungle Book
@adityarai48662 жыл бұрын
#askabhijit #answer According to you sir If getting the throne from the cruel half brother is cruel .( His half brother sushim was a cruel king to everyone, he even prisoned bindusar ). then what you would say about THE MAHABHARAT , were the 5 Pandavas cruel who took the throne from his half brothers for DHARMA and about the torture of Ashoka on some sect , we don't have any actual proof for that , SAMRAT ASHOK was the greatest King bharat could ever had .