Intellectual Property and 'Made In China 2025'

[@benwong4648]

Excellent. Faur discussion based on data not subjective BS. Keep going Asian Soceity.

[@wanalan9958]

China did not force them to pass on the IP. It is a fair exchange of mkt access and IP rights.

[@Dovid2000]

On 29 January 2019, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman, Mr. Geng Shuang, said: "China is strongly dissatisfied and firmly opposed to the US for insisting on submitting the official extradition request to Canada despite China's solemn complaints. We again urge the US to immediately withdraw the arrest warrant on Ms Meng Wanzhou and the official extradition request." This announcement from the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs should be taken as a good sign unto American onlookers. China seems to be wanting to conclude a trade deal with the USA, but on the one condition that its over-all relations with Washington are improved. So long as Ms. Meng's detention hovers over that relationship, China will be reluctant to conclude any significant trade deal with the USA. That is why China is now asking the US government to intervene and to halt her extradition - just before an expected trade deal, even though the legal proceedings in this case are currently in the hands of the Canadian justice department. The handwriting is on the wall: China will conclude a good trade with the USA only on the condition that Ms. Meng is released and bilateral relations between Washington and Beijing are improved.

[@wangyingsen458]

the principle of patent law is by opening the tech to public in exchanging of protection for a certain time. If a company decide to keep their tech as a business secret, they can not blame others to sell the similar product after they figure out how to produce the same thing.

[@Jsttobe]

26:30 Why the IT IP market size in China seems to the same as that in Taiwan? 1. Many IT hardware manufacturers in mainland China are invested by Taiwanese companies (Japanese/US/Other companies as well). That could explain way Taiwanese companies buys more. 2. The US government banned high-tech transfer from US companies to China.

[@thesheepthemightythecrazy]

Mark Cohen was the smartest guy in the room and 100% backs up his arguments and points with data.

[@veronicaolivares9150]

Thank you for the Data, I think it is fine for people to work hard but we definetely need to have a balance between family and work.

[@proudtobewhiteprivileged9530]

ip THEFT IS NOT r AND d

[@ungrateful-66]

TWO CENTS ARMY It was quite amazing listening to him drone on about R&D and completely ignore the subject of the debate but, the CCP likely has a knife to his family’s throats as is their style.

[@Finance-analyze]

The professor do not familiars to the patents in the telecommunication field. Basically, the patents belong to several big manufactures. each one has only 10%- 20% of the total patents. So, they make a deal called "Patent cross-licensing "

[@johannesbekker1970]

Well as long as you allow competition to rule in the economy instead of cooperation, then you'll need to put patent laws in practice.... But when one day ppl come to their senses/grow a heart and realize that competition in the economy is unfair for babies, old folks, the disabled etc. they'll look back and wonder how they could've been so stupid for so long. Inhuman and primitive......

[@lendaryreviews]

California...... lol .... sure ....... China understands California ^_^

[@natnat7660]

That is because HuaWei’s boss impose their employees to work as workaholics at the risk of sacrificing their human rights.

[@undefinedwewew9434]

force? ? Don't be funny, how many people do you want to enter Huawei? ? Do you know how much Huawei's overtime pay is high? ? Don't make excuses for your laziness.

[@edwinchoo7831]

Dumbass.... Huawei employees own shares of the company and are direct stakeholders..... That's why they are so hard working.... No one has Put a gun to their heads.....

[@ungrateful-66]

LoL amazed that he trusts Chinese Data for anything...